Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FFMI Calculator
FFMI Calculator
FFMI Calculator
The calculator will also tell you the relative development of your body parts for men, but for
women sufficient data are only available for whole-body estimates. You’ll need a
measurement tape to use the calculator. Menu
Male
Female
13
175
SHARE THIS
https://mennohenselmans.com/ffmi-calculator/ 2/9
13/4/24, 16:34 FFMI Calculator: Calculate your genetic muscular potential
63
Menu
Measured just below the hand, above the protruding bone on the outside of
your wrist.
17,4
Measured about an inch above the bony protrusions on the outsides of your
ankle joint, at the smallest point of your lower leg.
21
Measured with the tape just under your armpits with your arms relaxed at your
sides.
98
Measured while flexing your biceps, at the largest point without a pump.
34
Measured at its largest point, with clenched fists, hands out straight ahead.
29
SHARE THIS
https://mennohenselmans.com/ffmi-calculator/ 3/9
13/4/24, 16:34 FFMI Calculator: Calculate your genetic muscular potential
34
Measured while standing in relaxed position with the tape midway on the thigh.
55
34
Results
19.3
0.9
SHARE THIS
https://mennohenselmans.com/ffmi-calculator/ 4/9
13/4/24, 16:34 FFMI Calculator: Calculate your genetic muscular potential
Neck: 3% Menu
underdeveloped
Torso: perfect!
Upper arms: 6%
underdeveloped
Forearm: 1%
overdeveloped
Thigh: 7%
overdeveloped
Calf: perfect!
SHARE THIS
https://mennohenselmans.com/ffmi-calculator/ 5/9
13/4/24, 16:34 FFMI Calculator: Calculate your genetic muscular potential
81.4
Normalized FFMI
18.2
Methodology
The calculation of men’s maximum muscular potential is based on Casey Butt’s extensive
research published in his book Your Muscular
SHAREPotential.
THIS People familiar with this work may
https://mennohenselmans.com/ffmi-calculator/ 6/9
13/4/24, 16:34 FFMI Calculator: Calculate your genetic muscular potential
notice this calculator gives different, generally lower, estimates than the other calculators you
can find online, including on Casey Butt’s own website. That’s because they’re based only on
his first research that’s available online for free. Those older formulas were based on a Menu
smaller sample size of individuals with almost exclusively top tier genetics.
Moreover, the formulas were probably overfitted to the data, as the calculation for maximum
arm size included not just wrist size but also ankle size, for example, which of course doesn’t
make much sense.
The 4th edition of his work published a larger sample size with better-generalized formulas.
These formulas are likely to be more accurate for the average person.
Although the formulas correct for body fat percentage, since fat-free mass scales
considerably with body fat percentage, these estimates are only accurate for men in the body
fat range of 4-12%. Fatter individuals may be able to achieve greater levels of muscularity.
From these data sets, we calculate the weighted average fat-free mass index (FFMI) and its
standard deviation to estimate the population’s normal distribution for maximum
muscularity. The FFMI values were height-adjusted based on Kouri et al. (1995) to account
for the fact human mass scales in 3 dimensions with height. To estimate the true standard
deviation, we corrected for the measurement errors from body composition measurements in
bodybuilders measured by Lichtenbelt et al. (2004) using the bias correction method
of Trafimow (2014).
This allows us to limit the range of what’s naturally achievable to that of genetic variation and
not measurement error.
With the estimates of the population’s mean, normalized, natural, maximum fat-free mass
index and its true standard deviation, we can calculate the percentage of the population that
can achieve a certain level of muscularity naturally.
For the ladies, only Chappell et al. (2018) provided good data to estimate the maximum
muscular potential of women. They estimated that the maximum fat-free mass index of
women was likely 20, 80% of that of men. This estimate is surprisingly plausible. In one of the
most popular articles, I showed that men and women
SHARE can gain muscle at the same relative
THIS
https://mennohenselmans.com/ffmi-calculator/ 7/9
13/4/24, 16:34 FFMI Calculator: Calculate your genetic muscular potential
rate. Based on a large data set by Schutz et al. (2002) in Nature, untrained women have an
average FFMI of 15.4 compared to 18.9 for men, a ratio of 0.81.
Menu
This ratio remains relatively constant in various strength sports (Santos et al. 2014, Healy et
al. 2014). On average in all data sets with the untrained individuals, the physique athletes,
gymnasts, athletics and top tier athletes of all sports combined, the ratio is again 0.81. With
this estimate, I calculated a gender-normalized FFMI, which allows us to estimate the
percentage probability a woman’s physique can be attained naturally based on the same
standards as that of men.
5.6K
SHARES a Share 6 Other
Email Address *
Email Address
Send It!
By filling in your details you consent with our privacy policy and the way we handle your personal data.
Menno Henselmans
SHARE THIS
https://mennohenselmans.com/ffmi-calculator/ 8/9
13/4/24, 16:34 FFMI Calculator: Calculate your genetic muscular potential
SHARE THIS
https://mennohenselmans.com/ffmi-calculator/ 9/9