1

Evolution of an Attorney During a Criminal Trial

Student ID

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Faculty & Course Name

Unit Code and Name

Due Date
 2

Abstract

This article explores the historical development and current importance of the right to legal

counsel in court processes. This analysis draws upon a wide range of scholarly sources to

emphasize the fundamental ideas that have their origins in the ancient legal traditions of both

Roman and English common law. These principles ultimately led to the establishment of

constitutional amendments and international declarations that ensure the protection of this

important right. The literature covers the contemporary implementation of this entitlement within

professional contexts, with a particular emphasis on its crucial function in guaranteeing equitable

and unbiased judicial proceedings. This paper examines the many obstacles faced by public

defenders, explores the ethical implications surrounding their work, and highlights the pressing

demand for increased accessibility to legal services.

The study also examines the prospective consequences of the entitlement to an attorney,

with emphasis on the influence of advancing technology in criminal justice, the ethical

quandaries experienced by defense attorneys, and the harmonization of international legal norms.

The future of this right is to be influenced by advocacy campaigns and criminal justice reform.

The entitlement to legal counsel is entrenched in legal customs, undergoing constant evolution to

accommodate the dynamic nature of the legal landscape. The concept in question continues to

serve as a fundamental principle of fairness, and its forthcoming advancement will be shaped by

a multifaceted interaction of legal, technical, and sociological elements.

 3

Table of Contents
Abstract............................................................................................................................................2

Introduction......................................................................................................................................4

Historical Evolution of the Right to Legal Representation.............................................................4

Discussion of Current Academic Literature on the Topic...............................................................7

Discussion of Current Application of the Topic in the Professional Setting.................................10

Future implications........................................................................................................................12

Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................14

References......................................................................................................................................15
 4

Introduction

At any stage during the prosecution process, a defendant can obtain legal representation of

their choosing to assert or defend their legal entitlements. Without regard to the individual's

ethnic background, race, sex, dialect, faith, political or other perspective, national or cultural

heritage, possessions, birth, financial, or other circumstances, countries guarantee that all

individuals across their borders and dependent on their authority have reliable and equitable

access to attorneys (Klein, 2019). Legislatures have been trying to guarantee that less fortunate

individuals and, if required, other underprivileged people have access to adequate money and

other assets for legal representation. Attorneys' groups work together to plan and execute the

sharing of resources, including meeting spaces and educational opportunities for their members

(Gordon, 2019). The public's rights and responsibilities under the constitution, as well as

attorneys' crucial role in safeguarding those rights, are the focus of many governmental and bar

association-sponsored educational activities (UN, 2023). The impoverished and other

marginalized people need extra support to stand up for their rights and, if necessary, hire legal

representation. In all cases of arrest or detention, the accused is guaranteed access to legal

counsel and the right to confer with them in a setting free from interference, interruption, or

censorship. This paper addresses the state of the art in academic peer-reviewed literature on the

subject, its current application in the career field, and its potential future consequences.

Historical Evolution of the Right to Legal Representation

Even the earliest juridical structures incorporated the right to have an attorney in legal

proceedings. The right to counsel, nonetheless, has progressed considerably in the 21 st century.

Having an attorney appear at court hearings on one's behalf is a right rooted in ancient Rome
 5

(Klein, 2019). This representative was analogous to a modern-day defense attorney but with

different approaches and requirements (McCannon & Porreca, 2022). The privilege of an

attorney owes a great deal to the English common law tradition, which has left a significant

impact on the judicial structures of the United States and other nations (UN, 2023). The term

"assistance of counsel" has its roots in Medieval England. In the beginning stages of English law,

it was not uncommon for defendants to have to represent themselves in court.

The Sixth Amendment to the US Charter was a historic moment in the fight for the

entitlement to an attorney after its approval in 1791 (McCannon & Porreca, 2022). As the

amendment puts it, "the defendant will be granted the opportunity to receive the Assistance of

Counsel for their defense in all judicial cases (Langbein, 1996)." Because of this constitutional

change, the US judiciary has become a model for the rest of the entire globe (Klein, 2019). Legal

systems globally adopted the standard as binding. In 1948, the United Nations enacted the

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which includes a guarantee of access to justice,

including the provision of legal counsel (Gordon, 2019). The proclamation has had an impact on

the policies and laws of several nations.

Common law in England, like civil law elsewhere, flourished alongside other legal

schemes during the Middle Ages (Langbein, 1996). The Chancery and maritime tribunals

utilized Roman law, while religious tribunals followed canonical law, and courts in urban and

country areas followed regional customary legislation. It was not until Parliament set up an

indefinite restraint on the authority of the English king in the 17 th century that common law could

win over other laws and be established as supreme (Gordon, 2019). Similar developments in

national juridical traditions in civil law nations co-occurred with those in early modern Britain

(Langbein, 1996). British attorneys of the time placed immense pride in the distinctiveness of
 6

English legal conventions and entities, in contrast to their continental counterparts who, like

judicial humanists and Enlightenment academics, resorted to common civil law heritage

alongside national laws and precedent (William, 2005). William Blackstone's (1723-1780)

annotations on the Laws of England were the inaugural structured, analytical book on British

common law; they were likely the consequence of a combination of national pride and jealousy

at the time-appropriate European drive regarding codification.

Blackstone's book is currently the go-to reference for pre-U.S.-founding common law

principles in American law (O'Connor, 2012). When it comes to the law, the United States has

steadfastly stuck to the common law heritage that the British colonists brought with them to

North America (Langbein, 1996). Some state juridical systems in the United States might,

nevertheless, show remnants of the civil law legacy and its significance in the Americas (Klein,

2019). Louisiana is a noteworthy case in point because of its past as a French and Spanish colony

before its annexation from France in 1803 (Langbein, 1996). As a consequence, Louisiana's legal

system is founded on civil law. As former colonies of Spain and Mexico, several of the

jurisdictions in the southwestern United States retain vestiges of civil legislation in their charters

and statutes (McCannon & Porreca, 2022). For example, California's statutory civil code has a

structure reminiscent of the Roman public law's classifications of subjects, objects, and acts, but

its legislation is primarily common law.

Even though Blackstone is the go-to for pre-American constitutional precedent, Roman

civil law has a place in American judicial heritage worth noting. The outstanding civil law

attorneys and intellectuals were well known to the early Americans and other literate individuals

of the time, and they were familiar with the contributions of English scholars like Blackstone

(Gordon, 2019). For instance, Thomas Jefferson held many copies of Justinian's Institutions. He
 7

spoke highly of the initial American transcribed copy from 1812, which included notes and

observations on the connections with English law. In the landmark instance of Pierson v. Post in

1805, a New York jury resolved an argument involving two hunters concerning the ownership of

a fox by applying an idea from the Roman legal treatise Institutes that addressed the status and

ownership of untamed animals. Among the earliest property-related cases lectured to American

law undergraduates nowadays is Pierson v. Post (William, 2005). Community ownership was not

something that California adopted from the Common Law of England, but rather something that

it adopted from the statutory traditions of Visigothic Spain, which date back to the fifth century

CE and formed the basis of the 1925 California scenario the United States v. Robbins, which

established the pathway for the state's contemporary communal property statutes. These cases are

intriguing reminders of the historical roots of contemporary law and shed light on the complex

history that unifies and separates the civil and common law systems.

Discussion of Current Academic Literature on the Topic

To have a right to legal aid, one must at least be able to file lawsuits or guard oneself in a

courtroom effectively (Brito, 2019). Although numerous tribunals sometimes permit defendants

to speak for themselves, it is evident that successful access usually necessitates the assistance of

a qualified attorney, as attorneys have exclusive access to the privilege of practicing law in

tribunals and the expertise that comes with that (Klein, 2019; Gordon, 2019; Langbein, 1996).

However, the costs of settling a dispute are so high that most people, even those in the middle-

income range, can not use the justice system for anything but the most basic of tasks unless they

can find another way to pay for it, such as through contingent fees, attorney fee offers paid by the

other side, or state-funded legal representation.

 8

Access to legal assistance in the 21st century involves more than simply the ability to file a

lawsuit. It necessitates assistance completing official paperwork, finding one's way around

administrative red tape, and appealing unfavorable governmental decisions (Gordon, 2019). It

calls for assistance in preparing for significant life changes like starting a company, having a kid,

or getting divorced (McCannon & Porreca, 2022). It calls for efficient aid in contesting

unfavorable corporate or expert acts, as, for example, workers or clients (Brito, 2019). To do

this, you must have connections to influential decision-makers or those who can sway them

(Gordon, 2019). While accounting professionals, economic specialists, and advocates are all in

the same field as attorneys, attorneys often come out on top.

Legal professionals, authorities, and nonprofits made baby steps in the 20th century to

ensure that those unable to pay for legal representation might have the opportunity to receive

counsel. They took a little step toward a more just world (Gordon, 2019). They have also taken

measures in the past to limit the ability of the underprivileged to get legal representation. The US

legal profession has a long history of putting its priorities ahead of the general population,

especially the impoverished and financially disadvantaged, notwithstanding stirring rhetoric and

even more stirring precedents and exemplars (Brito, 2019). Mostly, they look out for the

strongest preferences of the wealthy and powerful while catering to the needs of some middle-

class customers and interests to the degree that doing so produces sufficient revenue.

Medieval attorneys did not charge much money for every case, but the complexities of

English legislation meant that no amateur could understand the pleading requirements (Green,

2017). There is no method to quantify the prevalence of reports mentioning low-income

plaintiffs who had their cases handled by assigned or pro bono lawyers (Brito, 2019). The Court

of Requests, manorial tribunals, and municipal tribunals probably handled most cases involving
 9

poor people (McCannon & Porreca, 2022). Common-law courts saw many middle-class

plaintiffs like merchants and prosperous farmers until the eighteenth century (Gordon, 2019).

However, by the middle of the eighteenth century, attorneys' charges and court-related expenses

had already risen beyond the budgets of middle-income individuals.

Until about the middle of the 18th century, an accused convict had to handle his legal battle

and could not hire an attorney to challenge the evidence against him (Green, 2017). By the

middle of the 1800s, however, things began to evolve with the advent of "free-lance" attorneys

(Brito, 2019). Concerning legal representation, the fledgling democracy firmly opposed former

English custom by granting national and state legal privileges for legal representation in felony

cases, mirroring the colonists' history on the receiving end of imperialist persecution (Klein,

2019). Even though the government did not pay for this privilege, tribunals frequently appointed

high-profile attorneys to represent defendants in murder trials for free (Gordon, 2019). They

frequently jumped at the opportunity to gain notoriety in high-profile cases.

Regional unstructured judicial bodies, such as adjudication of peace tribunals or county

legislatures, were where most people seeking minor civil justice went without attorneys in the

early nineteenth century (Gordon, 2019). These tribunals were oversight bodies, enforcement

agencies, and problem resolvers for the community at large; this included spouses, minors, and

enslaved people. However, the data demonstrate that numerous lawsuits, even in expected trial

and appellate jurisdictions, involve attorneys contesting tiny figures, such as $50 to $100 (Brito,

2019). Most states had minimal or no requirements for entering the field so that litigants could

use inexpensive representation. In 1900, in response to the influx of Jewish immigration to New

York, the city established an independent Legal Aid Society. The group originated as a legal aid

office for German refugees. New York Legal Aid, in contrast to the women's protection
 10

organizations, relied primarily on legal professionals and saw its mission as one of legal

representation instead of social service (Klein, 2019). The attorneys perceived the Jews as

belligerent, argumentative, and petty, so they took it upon themselves to indoctrinate their clients

in American principles (Gordon, 2019). It declined to take action if the defendants had no

property and solely sought financial compensation for its customers.

The opportunity to have an attorney in criminal proceedings has been the subject of much

academic study. Scholars have looked at how this privilege came to be, what it means legally,

and what it means practically. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), a major Supreme Court case,

guaranteed the right of legal representation for persons who could not otherwise afford one

(McCannon & Porreca, 2022). The effects of this ruling on criminal law and the interpretation of

the federal constitution have been the subject of extensive discussion (Brito, 2019). Research

shows that having competent legal counsel is essential to the protection of defendants' rights and

the promotion of equal treatment in legal proceedings (Gordon, 2019). These studies highlight

the need for knowledgeable defense attorneys and sufficient funds to ensure fair trials.

Discussion of Current Application of the Topic in the Professional Setting

In criminal law, an entitlement to an attorney is not simply an abstract concept but an

empirical requirement. An impartial trial for a defendant depends heavily on the work of the

defense lawyers. They advise their customers, do necessary research, advocate on their behalf in

a legal proceeding, and mediate disputes (Brito, 2019). Defense solicitors need an extensive

understanding of constitutional principles, analytical competencies, and persuasive speaking

ability to succeed in the legal profession (Green, 2017). While having access to legal advice is

guaranteed by law, availability fluctuates greatly (Gordon, 2019). Public attorneys are available
 11

in numerous nations to help those who cannot otherwise afford legal representation (McCannon

& Porreca, 2022). Nonetheless, in many places, people have voiced reservations regarding the

reliability and accessibility of state defense services.

For those who struggle to pay personal attorneys, the authorities nominate a public

prosecutor to advocate for their interests in court. There is a strong correlation between the

superiority of public defense services and the impartiality of legal proceedings. Both academics

and legal professionals have studied the difficulties that public prosecutors confront, such as

heavy caseloads and inadequate resources (Gordon, 2019). Providing access to legal counsel in

the workplace presents employers with a unique constellation of hurdles. Problems with the

lawyer-client interaction, overworked defense attorneys, and lengthy wait times for the

scheduling of attorneys constitute factors that might compromise the quality of advocacy (Brito,

2019). There is continuing discussion and attempts to improve in response to these difficulties.

Legal frameworks in the juridical world strongly uphold the client's entitlement to legal

counsel throughout legal proceedings. A public prosecutor is a professional who represents

defendants in criminal cases who cannot pay for private representation. Ethics and professional

codes help defense lawyers defend their customers effectively (Brito, 2019). Lawyers are

ethically obligated to fight for those they represent, question the prosecution's evidence, and

safeguard their customer's constitutional freedoms throughout the proceedings. Nevertheless,

problems remain in guaranteeing everyone, especially people experiencing poverty, access to

adequate legal counsel (Gordon, 2019). It can be challenging for public attorneys to offer

adequate counsel when they have little funds, excessive caseloads, and few available resources.

Increased financing, stricter limitations on attorneys' caseloads, and more comprehensive

education for defense attorneys are all part of the plan to solve these problems.
 12

No absolute right to legal representation exists in civil matters under the United States

Constitution. Nonetheless, there is a growing push within the legal community to secure this

privilege for economically disadvantaged, underrepresented civil litigants. Implementation of

this constitutional provision turns out to be just as crucial as the existence of this privilege itself.

Any new entitlement must be nationwide, well-funded, and insulated from political meddling to

be genuinely successful (Brito, 2019). To help individuals with the entire breadth of their legal

challenge and avoid subsequent legal difficulties, lawyers must be accessible early and

frequently throughout the legal procedure (McCannon & Porreca, 2022). Procedural protections

for the entitlement of representation in civil cases should extend to all cases where essential

requirements are at risk and should not be subject to the whims of ill-informed decisions about

who deserves legal assistance (Gordon, 2019). According to the study's findings, limiting the

period during which assigned counsel is accessible would significantly reduce the efficacy of the

right to criminal representation (Green, 2017). Early consultation with a full-service lawyer

increases the likelihood of suitable preliminary orders and subsequent modifications as the case

progresses (Brito, 2019). Individuals lacking legal representation at these stages are more likely

to violate their sentences, leading to contemptuous hearings and the possibility of civil

imprisonment and other severe consequences.

Future implications

The ongoing development of the right to legal counsel in criminal proceedings is a fluid

and evolving phenomenon. The criminal defense profession is expected to be influenced by

technological advancements in law (UN, 2023). Technology like digital evidence, digital case

management systems, and artificial intelligence used in legal research can significantly change
 13

what defense lawyers have to do and how the legal process works (Gordon, 2019). Furthermore,

obtaining legal assistance continues to be significant and urgent (Klein, 2019). The ongoing

discourse surrounding legal reform will consistently prioritize the endeavor to enhance the

availability of legal counsel, with a particular emphasis on addressing the needs of marginalized

populations (Brito, 2019). New strategies, like using online legal clinics and offering free

services, could become more well-known and vital in the legal field.

Another implication pertains to ethical considerations. The ethical concerns about the right

to legal counsel have greater significance when the legal environment undergoes evolution

(Gordon, 2019). Defense attorneys are required to traverse intricate ethical quandaries,

encompassing matters about the preservation of client confidentiality, management of conflicts

of interest, and the provision of vigorous counsel (McCannon & Porreca, 2022). The

ramifications of evolving international legal standards and norms about the right to counsel are

extensive (Brito, 2019). Policymakers and legal experts will prioritize endeavors aimed at

achieving harmonization of legal processes and establishing a uniform standard of protection for

persons facing accusations on a worldwide scale (d’Amato, 2017). The general public's

perceptions might impact the future course of the right to legal representation. A lot of progress

will be made in this area through advocacy efforts that aim to make more people aware of how

important this right is and push for changes to the law.

In anticipation of forthcoming developments, the ongoing progression of the right to legal

counsel in criminal cases will persist and encounter novel obstacles (d’Amato, 2017). Questions

have been raised about digital evidence, cybercrime, and the use of artificial intelligence in court

proceedings because of how quickly technology is changing (Gordon, 2019). Academic research

will assume a pivotal role in comprehending these nascent concerns and subsequently
 14

influencing the development of legal frameworks (UN, 2023). Moreover, it is anticipated that the

continuing discourse about criminal justice reform will have a significant influence on the

entitlement to legal counsel (McCannon & Porreca, 2022). Efforts aimed at mitigating racial

inequities, diminishing the prevalence of mass imprisonment, and enhancing the accessibility of

justice will have a significant impact on the comprehension and execution of the right to legal

counsel (Brito, 2019). Instead of using old methods, like alternative dispute resolution processes,

new ones must be used to keep the people's entitlement to legal representation by a lawyer

working well in the changing legal environment.

Conclusion

This right of legal representation is derived from long-standing legal traditions and has

come through various constitutional amendments and international declarations. The academic

literature sheds light on historical developments and modern challenges towards the notion and

current status of such rights. The future implications of having a right to legal representation are

multidimensional as the legal field keeps changing. The continued improvement of this

fundamental right involves technological developments, efforts to broaden access to legal

services, ethical considerations, adherence to international standards, and advocacy initiatives. It

is legal experts, policymakers, scholars, and the whole society that will determine how this right

to legal representation will continue. In the professional setting, defense attorneys are mandated

to uphold this right to all its stakeholders. Providing equal access to quality representation still

faces hurdles and inequalities. In the future, the right to legal representation will keep developing

according to the changes in technology and criminal justice reforms in society.

 15

References

Brito, T. L. (2019, January 7). The Right to Civil Counsel. American Academy of Arts &

Sciences. https://www.amacad.org/publication/right-civil-counsel

d’Amato, A. (2017). The concept of human rights in international law. In International Law of

Human Rights (pp. 21-70). Routledge.

Gordon, R. W. (2019). Lawyers, the legal profession & access to justice in the United States: a

brief history. Daedalus, 148(1), 177-189. https://www.amacad.org/publication/lawyers-

legal-profession-access-justice-united-states-brief-history

Green, B. A. (2017). The Right to Two Criminal Defense Lawyers. Mercer L. Rev., 69, 675.

Fordham Law School: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History.

https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/931

Klein, L. (2019). The Rule of Law and the Fundamental Role of Lawyers. Studia Iuridica, (79),

9-13. https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902885.pdf

Langbein, J. H. (1996). Historical foundations of the law of evidence: A view from the Ryder

sources. Colum. L. Rev., 96, 1168.

McCannon, B. C., & Porreca, Z. (2022). The Right to Counsel: Criminal Prosecution in 19 th

Century London. Available at SSRN 4006013.

https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/faculty_publications/3109

O'Connor, V. (2012). Common law and civil law traditions: Historical development of English

Common Law. SSRN 2665675.

https://www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CommonLawCivilLawTraditio

ns.pdf
 16

UN (2023). Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, United Nations Human Rights: Office of

the High Commissioner. By the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of

Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-

mechanisms/instruments/basic-principles-role-lawyers

William, J. (2005). Criminal Law-The Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel-The Supreme Court

Minimizes the Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel by Maximizing the Deference

Awarded to Barely Competent Defense Attorneys-Florida v. Nixon. UALR L. Rev., 28,

149. https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview/vol28/iss1/6