Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Adsorption of SR II Cations Onto Phosphated Mesopo 2019 Journal of Environm
Adsorption of SR II Cations Onto Phosphated Mesopo 2019 Journal of Environm
Keywords: In this work, phosphate-modified titanium dioxide nanoparticles with mesoporous structure were synthesized
Titania and utilised as an efficient nanoadsorbent for Sr(II) removal from aqueous environment. The globular titania
Sr(II) particles with a 3–4 nm diameter with chemosorbed on their surfaces phosphate groups = Ti(O2POOH) have
Adsorption been obtained by liquid-phase synthesis. The characterization of titania nanoparticles were performed using
Phosphate
XRD, TEM, IR-spectroscopy and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller analyses. The synthesized modified adsorbents ex-
Radionuclide
hibited SBET = 396–410 m2 g−1 and mesopore volume of 0.262 – 0.275сm3 g−1. The isotherm and kinetic
Aqueous environment
models were used for the description of Sr(II) adsorption. The sample 4P-TiO2 showed the best adsorption ability
for strontium ions removal. The adsorption capacity of Sr(II) onto modified 2P-TiO2, 4P-TiO2 and 8P-TiO2
samples was found to be 94.1, 172.5, 128.9 mg/g, respectively. An adsorption mechanism for Sr(II) removal was
proposed. The adsorption/desorption studies were conducted to find the reusability of phosphated adsorbents. A
titanium dioxide-based mesoporous material possesses a significant adsorption activity due to high content of
surface acid sites. All the outcomes revealed that the phosphate modified titania showed great potential in Sr(II)
removal from aqueous environment and nuclear effluents.
1. Introduction with atmospheric precipitations. Heavy metals are oxidized in the soils;
washed out by rainwater and fall into the reservoirs. Different treat-
Water is an essential and important substance on Earth, because it ment techniques like coagulation, precipitation, ultrafiltration, filtra-
provides the vital functions of living organisms. However, due to nat- tion and adsorption have been used for the removal of toxic pollutants
ural and technogenic impacts, the quality of our water resources is [8–10]. Among them, the adsorption technology has some more bene-
constantly deteriorating because of the accumulation of inorganic and fits – simplicity, accessibility and efficiency [11].
organic harmful substances [1,2]. Particularly serious danger to the Strontium-90 originates from nuclear power plants and is well
biosphere causes water pollution by toxic heavy metals such as stron- known hazardous element for the environment due to its high harmful
tium(II), lead(II), cadmium(II), zinc(II), cupper(II), as well as arsenate, effect and radioactivity [12]. The accumulation of strontium in the
selenate, and fluoride anions [3–6]. Excessive presence of these pollu- body leads to the destruction of the whole body (general toxic effect).
tants in the water can causes carcinogenic, mutagenic or teratogenic The most typical form of this disease is the development of dystrophic
effects on living organisms. changes in the osteo-articular system during the period of body growth
The main origins of environmental pollution are thermal power (there is a lag in growth, exhaustion, baldness, etc.). This disease is
plants, ferrous metallurgy enterprises, non-ferrous metallurgy en- accompanied also by a pronounced disturbance of the calcium-phos-
terprises, and chemical industry. The pollutants are accumulating in the phorus ratio in the blood, intestinal dysbiosis. In the presence of
earth near the enterprises of ferrous and nonferrous metallurgy [7]. strontium, iodine becomes inaccessible to the human organism; as a
More than 95% of them entering into the soils as technogenic dust or result, the internal iodine deficiency occurs. In this regard, the problem
Corresponding author at: Educational and Scientific Center of Material Science and Nanotechnology, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ivano-
⁎
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103430
Received 10 July 2019; Received in revised form 14 September 2019; Accepted 20 September 2019
Available online 29 September 2019
2213-3437/ © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
I. Mironyuk, et al. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7 (2019) 103430
of Sr(II) removal from water is very important for Ukraine and other 2.3. Adsorption of Sr(II)
counties, which had accidents at nuclear power plants [13].
The different types of sorbents have been intensively investigated The adsorbed amount of Sr(II) was estimated from the difference
for toxic pollutants removal from aquatic environment such as sand, between the initial concentration of Sr(II) (from 0.001 to 0.1 mol·L−1
clays, kaolin, dolomite, etc. However, such adsorbents have low effi- SrCl2) and the equilibrium concentration of Sr(II) after its contact with
ciency, since the adsorption process is very slow and their adsorption the adsorbent. The adsorbent with certain mass was added to a model
capacity is small [14–16]. In addition, the ZrO2 microspheres [17], solution of metal at 293 K, after 4 h it was centrifuged and the equili-
magnetic graphene oxide [18], activated carbon [19], titanate nano- brium concentration of Sr(II) (Ce) was determined using a com-
tubes [20], TiO2 nanoparticles [21], hydroxyapatite [22], niobate na- plexometry [33] by the following equation:
nofibers [23] have also been used for Sr(II) adsorption. In could be seen
(Ci (Sr ) Ce (Sr ))* V (solution)
that the titanate adsorbents possess much better adsorption capacity qe =
mads (1)
towards strontium ions compared to the known adsorbents. It was
noted that the adsorptive properties of titanante nanomaterials depend −1
where Ci(Sr) and Ce(Sr) (mg·L ) are initial and equilibrium con-
on the synthesis methods. The controlled synthesis creates the oppor- centration of Sr(II) respectively, V(solution) (L) is volume of model
tunities for designing the micro- and mesoporous adsorbents with de- solution, and mads (g) is mass of the titania adsorbent.
sired surface, morphology and structural properties which increase Kinetics of Sr(II) adsorption onto raw and phosphated titania was
their activity in various environmental processes. studied at pH: 7.0 and temperature: 298 K in the solution with Co(Sr)
It was shown that titanium(IV)-based compounds had a capability to =0.01 mol·L−1; m(ads) = 0.05 g and contact time 140 min. At certain
adsorb heavy metals [24–27], and the surface modification increased intervals, the solution was separated from the adsorbent and analyzed
their adsorption properties [28,29]. For example, according to the [25], for strontium content. All the data were the average values of three
the layered titanium phosphate was investigated as promising ad- parallel adsorption tests.
sorbent due to chemosorbed phosphate groups located at its surface, In addition, the point of zero charge (pHPZC) of titania adsorbents
which can bind the metal cations in the aqueous environment. How- was also measured by drift method [34] and the adsorption/desorption
ever, its adsorption capacity was low due to small porosity and low experiments were performed to estimate the reusability of titania ad-
surface area. Earlier our scientific group proposed a new way to obtain sorbents.
mesoporous titania [30] with chemisorbed orthophosphate groups on
its surface. The high porosity of the material and the existence of
3. Results and discussion
chemisorbed phosphate groups on the pores surface could substantially
increase its ability to bind Sr(II) cations, as well as cations of other
3.1. Modification of titania adsorbent
heavy metals. The promising phosphatized adsorbents for the removal
of Sr(II) ions in water treatment were also reported by Ivanets et al.
The titanium aquacomplex [Ti(H2O)6]3+·3Cl− as a precursor allows
[31], which were prepared by the soft non-acidic method using ther-
to obtain a titania nanoparticles with desired physic-chemical proper-
mally activated dolomite and NaH2PO4,Na2HPO4 and Na3PO4 as
ties by liquid-phase route [30]. The NaOH addition leads to the for-
phosphating reagents.
mation of molecules Ti(OH)4·2H2O according to the scheme (2):
Therefore, the aim of this work was to obtain mesoporous titania
with chemosorbed phosphate groups and to investigate their impact on
the sorption ability to eliminate Sr(II) from aquatic environment. The
mesoporous TiO2 was obtained by the liquid-phase route using a tita-
nium aquacomplex and a modifying reagent Na3PO4 as a precursors.
(2)
The introduction of Na3PO4 modifier into the aquacomplex pre-
2. Experimental cursor changes the reaction equilibrium and causes the oxidation of
Ti3+ cations. The anions OH−, PO43- form intermediate complex [Ti
2.1. Synthesis of unmodified and modified titania adsorbent (O2POOH)(OH2)5]3+·3Cl−. After NaOH addition, the pH is increased
and intermediate complexes are converted into the molecules Ti
The titanium aquacomplex precursor [Tі(H2O)6]3+·3Cl– was ob- (O2POOH)3(OH)3·2H2O, which become as centers of origin and growth
tained as described in [32]. The modification of TiO2 was performed by of primary oxide particles (Eq. 3):
sodium orthophosphate (2, 4 and 8% (wt.) of Na3PO4). The NaOH was
added in a drop wise manner to obtain the pH = 1–2 at temperature
70 °C during 30–40 min. After that, the pH of the solutions was in-
creased to around 6-7. The obtained nanoparticles were detached from
solutions by the vacuum filtration, washed and dried at temperature
120–140 °C.
(3)
The peculiarity of the titania particles growth process is that
2.2. Characterization methods the = Ti(O2POOH) groups are focused on the primary particles surface.
Thereafter, the condensation process is changed in such a way that the
The phase analysis was performed by XRD (STOE STADI P, Cukα surface with chemosorbed phosphate groups forms the interparticle
anode (λ =0.154 nm)). The calculation of crystallite sizes was carried pores between the particles, increase the surface area and pore volume
out by methods of integral width of diffraction reflexes with the help of in the titania adsorbents.
WinPLOTR software. The structural and adsorption characteristics were
carried out using BET-surface area analyzer (Quantachrome Autosorb, 3.2. Characterization
Nova 2200e, at 77 K). The IR-spectra were recorded using SPECORD
M80 spectrophotometer in the range of 4000-300 cm−1. Transmission 3.2.1. X-ray diffraction analysis
electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs were performed using the The diffractograms of the TiO2 samples are depicted in Fig. 1 and
JEM-100 CX II and JSM 2100 F microscopes. proved that the samples of the unmodified titania (TiO2) and the
2
I. Mironyuk, et al. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7 (2019) 103430
(Fig. 2b). The drying of the water dispersion lets to grow up of spherical
aggregates and formed a porous xerogel product. It could be seen that
most of particles of the xerogel were crystallographically disoriented
(Fig. 2c).
3
I. Mironyuk, et al. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7 (2019) 103430
Fig. 2. TEM: (a) Primary particles of 4P-TiO2; (b) Aggregates of 4P-TiO2 nanoparticles; (c) Nanocrystallites of 4P-TiO2 xerogel.
Fig. 4. The PSD with respect to pore radii of raw and modified TiO2.
Table 2
Morphological characteristics of titania samples.
Adsorbent S, m2·g−1 Smicro m2·g−1 Smeso m2·g−1 Smeso/S, % V cm3·g−1 Vmicro сm3·g−1 Vmeso сm3·g−1 Vmeso/V, %
4
I. Mironyuk, et al. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7 (2019) 103430
Fig. 7. The removal efficiencies of Sr(II) from 0.001 mol/L solution of SrCl2
onto unmodified and modified titania.
Fig. 6. (a) Sr(II) adsorption data on the raw and phosphated titania adsorbents, fitted to (b) Langmuir, (c) Freundlich, (d) Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm models
(pH 7.0, V = 5 mL, m(ads) = 50 mg, T =293 K, contact time 4 h).
5
I. Mironyuk, et al. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7 (2019) 103430
Table 3 where k2 (g·mg−1 min−1) is the rate constant of the PSO model; q e
Comparing of the adsorption ability for reported adsorbents for the Sr(II) (mg·g−1) is the equilibrium amount of adsorbate. It could be seen that
elimination. obtained values of initial sorption rate h are 2.95; 4.58; 23.53 and
Adsorbent qe (mg·g−1) References 19.65 mg g−1 min-1 for TiO2, 2P-TiO2, 4P-TiO2, and 8P-TiO2, respec-
tively. These data suggested that the titania modified by 4%(wt.) of
magnetic chitosan beads 11.58 [16] phosphate revealed the maximum h. It should be indicated that the PSO
phosphate-modified montmorillonite 12.5 [15]
model fit well the processes means that it involved more than one stage
Egyptian soils 12.53 [14]
TiO2 NPs 25.00 [21]
for adsorption from aquatic medium between the adsorbent and ad-
Titanate nanotubes 66.72 [20] sorbate species [51], what is taking place in the current study (please
Hydroxyapatite 24.5 (0.28 mmol·g−1) [49] see the explanation below).
TiO2 70.9 This study The Elovich model was applied to explore the adsorption initial rate
2P-TiO2 94.1 This study
and the desorption constant . From Fig. 10c it is clear that plot qt vs.
8P-TiO2 128.9 This study
4P-TiO2 172.5 This study ln(t) show good linear correlation. The slope and intercept give us the
Elovich constants, which are tabulated in Table S2. The highest mag-
nitude of is for 8P-TiO2 sample ( = 2008.11), and desorption con-
modified titanium adsorbents for the Sr(II) adsorption vs. the contact stant for phosphated titania are in three-four times smaller ( = 0.17-
time (t, min) depicted in Fig. 9 (for 0.01 mol/L initial strontium(II) 0.28) than that of raw sample ( = 0.69 for TiO2).
concentration and for contact time 140 min). The adsorption was fast at In order to forecast the rate-controlling step of adsorption the in-
the beginning and reached the equilibrium after 60 min. traparticle diffusion model (IPD) [48] has been involved to fit the ex-
A pseudo-first-order model, a pseudo-second-order model, an perimental data and the estimated kinetic parameters were shown in
Elovich model, and an intraparticle diffusion model [48] were applied Table S2. The analysis has shown that plot qt vs. t0.5 has one linear
to explain the kinetics of adsorption. All kinetics parameters, estimated ranges for TiO2 and two linear ranges for phosphated samples
from experimental data and the above-mentioned models, are pre- (Fig. 10d). It can be concluded that the adsorption onto raw titania
sented in Table S2 and depicted in Fig. 10(a–d). Fitting degree of the includes surface adsorption and micropore diffusion, while the ad-
kinetic models was evaluated by correlation coefficient R2. sorption process onto phosphated adsorbents includes the transporta-
The results indicated that the obtained data well described by the tion of strontium cations to the external surface and diffusion of Sr(II)
PSO kinetic model (R2 = 0.9980 – 0.9999). The calculated from PSO into the mesopores of adsorbent. In addition, the plots did not pass
model equilibrium adsorption capacities qe(calc) are in the good agree- through the origin (Fig. 10d), and constants C1, and C2 were not zero,
ment with experimentally obtained adsorption capacity qe(exp). The demonstrating that diffusion through boundary layer also occurred in
initial sorption rate h (mg·g−1 min−1) was estimated by the Eq. 6: the uptake of Sr(II) onto adsorbents [48]. It can be noticed, the con-
stants C2 are higher than constants C1 indicating that the contribution
h = k2 qe2 of boundary layer to adsorption rate increased from stage 1 to stage 2.
(6)
6
I. Mironyuk, et al. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7 (2019) 103430
Fig. 10. Kinetics studies: (a) PFO; (b) PSO; (c) Elovich; (d) intraparticle diffusion model (pH = 7.0, 298 K, mads = 50 mg, V =20 mL).
number of ≡TіOH groups on the titania globules surface [28]. The Table 4
calculations (Table 4) have shown that the average amount of those The adsorption centers on the phosphated titania surface.
groups is 128 units per 10 nm2 of surface area. According to [57] there Adsorbent The amount of adsorption centers (per 10 nm2) The
are 120–140 ≡TіOH groups per 10 mn2 on the TiO2 surface area and percentage of
those groups can be neutral ≡TіOH, basic ≡TіOHδ– or acidic adsorption
≡TіOHδ+. centers (%)
=Tі(O2POOH) ≡TіOHδ+ ≡TіOHδ−
The results show that the rise in the amount of chemosorbed
phosphate groups leads to an increase of titania activity regarding to TіO2* 0 27.0 0 21.1
strontium adsorption. From Table 4 it can be seen that there are 27 2P-TіO2 1.9 29.7 0.7 25.2
≡TіOHδ+ active centers per 10 mn2 for non-modified titania ad- 4P-TіO2 3.7 54.1 1.8 45.2
8P-TіO2 8.0 36.8 1.0 35.8
sorbent, what is equal to 21.1% of total number of ≡TіOH groups. The
2P-TіO2 adsorbent surface contain 1.9 phosphate groups and 29.7 ac- * the average amount of hydroxyl groups is 128 species per 10 nm2 [28].
tive centers ≡TіOHδ+ per 10 mn2, while the chemisorption of 3.7
phosphate groups per 10 mn2 in the 4P-TіO2 sample leads to formation centers, what is less than in the 4P-TіO2 sample. The decreasing of the
of 54.1 acidic centers ≡TіOHδ+ (45.2%) on its surface. In the 8P-TiO2 active centers number in this adsorbent is probably due to higher ag-
sample the eight phosphate groups cause the formation of 36.8 acidic gregation of the primary particles, which limits the access of Sr(II)
Fig. 11. The impact of pH on Sr(II) ions adsorption onto phosphated titania.
7
I. Mironyuk, et al. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7 (2019) 103430
cations to the active centers. The data presented in the Table 4 allow us
to calculate the ability of chemisorbed titanium-phosphate groups to
form acidic centers ≡TіOHδ+ in the vicinity. In particular, in the 4P-
TiO2 adsorbent the one = Tі(O2POOH) group generates 14.6 Brønsted
centers which are able to bind the strontium cations.
The rooting of titanium-phosphate groups = Tі(O2POOH) into the
TiO2 surface structure increases the proton-donor ability of surface
hydroxyls and they become able to bind the Sr(II) cations. The higher
electronegativity of phosphorus atoms compared to titanium atoms
causes the displacement of the electron density to the phosphorus atoms
in the = Tі(O2POOH) groups. The inductive effect of the electron
density redistribution is also taking place in the Ti-O-Ti bridges at-
tached to the titanium-phosphate groups, therefore, the neighboring
hydroxyl groups get proton-donor properties and become as Brønsted
acid centers (Scheme (7)): Fig. 12. Reusability of phosphated titania adsorbents (experimental conditions:
0.0025 mol·L−1 Sr(II) solution, temperature 25 °C, pH = 7.0).
(8)
(9)
8
I. Mironyuk, et al. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7 (2019) 103430
9
I. Mironyuk, et al. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7 (2019) 103430
D. Ziolkovska, Adsorptive removal of toxic Methylene blue and Acid Orange 7 dyes 385–470, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013.
from aqueous medium using cobalt-zinc ferrite nanoadsorbents, Desalin. Water [47] T.P. O’Connor, J. Mueller, Modeling competitive adsorption of chlorinated volatile
Treat. 150 (2019) 374–385, https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.23751. organic compounds with the Dubinin–Radushkevich equation, Microporous
[35] I.F. Myronyuk, V.I. Mandzyuk, T.V. Herhel, Dimensional effects in the pyrogenic Mesoporous Mater. 46 (2001) 341–349, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-1811(01)
silicon dioxide nanoparticles, Phys. Chem. Solid State. 6 (2005) 34. 00317-1.
[36] I.F. Myronyuk, Y.P. Voronin, V.I. Mandzyuk, N.A. Bezruka, T.V. Dmytrotsa, The [48] H.N. Tran, S.-J. You, A. Hosseini-Bandegharaei, H.-P. Chao, Mistakes and incon-
dimensional effect in trimethylsilylated silica nanoparticles, J. Nano- Electron. sistencies regarding adsorption of contaminants from aqueous solutions: a critical
Phys. 9 (2017) 1–5, https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.9(5).05030. review, Water Res. 120 (2017) 88–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2017.
[37] V. Kotsyubynsky, I. Myronyuk, V. Chelyadyn, A. Hrubiak, V. Moklyak, 04.014.
S. Fedorchenko, Rod-like rutile nanoparticles: synthesis, structure and morphology, [49] I.L. Shashkova, A.I. Ivanets, N.V. Kitikova, Sorption of Co2+, Pb2+, and Sr2+ ions
J. Nano Res. 50 (2017) 32–40, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ on hydroxyapatite, synthesized in the presence of oxyethylidenediphosphonic acid,
JNanoR.50.32. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 92 (2019) 625–633, https://doi.org/10.1134/
[38] T. Tatarchuk, N. Paliychuk, M. Pacia, W. Kaspera, W. Macyk, A. Kotarba, S1070427219050070.
B.F. Bogacz, A.T. Pędziwiatr, I. Mironyuk, R. Gargula, P. Kurzydło, A. Shyichuk, [50] T. Tatarchuk, B. Al-Najar, M. Bououdina, M.A.A. Ahmed, Catalytic and photo-
Structure-redox reactivity relationships in Co 1−x Zn x Fe 2 O 4 : the role of catalytic properties of oxide spinels, in: L. Martínez, O. Kharissova, B. Kharisov
stoichiometry, New J. Chem. 43 (2019) 3038–3049, https://doi.org/10.1039/ (Eds.), Handb. Ecomater. Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 1701–1750, , https://doi.org/
c8nj05329d. 10.1007/978-3-319-68255-6_158.
[39] I.F. Mironyuk, V.M. Gun’ko, H.V. Vasylyeva, O.V. Goncharuk, T.R. Tatarchuk, [51] X. Guo, J. Wang, A general kinetic model for adsorption: theoretical analysis and
V.I. Mandzyuk, N.A. Bezruka, T.V. Dmytrotsa, Effects of enhanced clusterization of modeling, J. Mol. Liq. 288 (2019) 111100, , https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.
water at a surface of partially silylated nanosilica on adsorption of cations and 2019.111100.
anions from aqueous media, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 277 (2019) 95–104, [52] M. Naushad, Surfactant assisted nano-composite cation exchanger: development,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.10.016. characterization and applications for the removal of toxic Pb2+ from aqueous
[40] P. Tiwari, R. Verma, S.N. Kane, T. Tatarchuk, F. Mazaleyrat, Effect of Zn addition on medium, Chem. Eng. J. 235 (2014) 100–108, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2013.
structural, magnetic properties and anti-structural modeling of magnesium-nickel 09.013.
nano ferrites, Mater. Chem. Phys. 229 (2019) 78–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. [53] M. Naushad, T. Ahamad, G. Sharma, A.H. Al-Muhtaseb, A.B. Albadarin, M.M. Alam,
matchemphys.2019.02.030. Z.A. ALOthman, S.M. Alshehri, A.A. Ghfar, Synthesis and characterization of a new
[41] A. Barhoumi, J.J. Suñol, M. Belhouchet, Crystal structure, vibrational studies and starch/SnO2 nanocomposite for efficient adsorption of toxic Hg2+ metal ion,
optical properties of a new organic phosphate (C12H14N2S) (H2PO4)2, J. Mol. Chem. Eng. J. 300 (2016) 306–316, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2016.04.084.
Struct. 1173 (2018) 448–455, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.06.115. [54] M. Naushad, T. Ahamad, B.M. Al-Maswari, A. Abdullah Alqadami, S.M. Alshehri,
[42] A. Roguska, M. Pisarek, M. Andrzejczuk, M. Dolata, M. Lewandowska, M. Janik- Nickel ferrite bearing nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon as efficient adsorbent for
Czachor, Characterization of a calcium phosphate-TiO2 nanotube composite layer the removal of highly toxic metal ion from aqueous medium, Chem. Eng. J. 330
for biomedical applications, Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 31 (2011) 906–914, https://doi. (2017) 1351–1360, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2017.08.079.
org/10.1016/j.msec.2011.02.009. [55] L. Sellaoui, D.I. Mendoza-Castillo, H.E. Reynel-Ávila, B.A. Ávila-Camacho,
[43] C. Sronsri, B. Boonchom, Synthesis, characterization, vibrational spectroscopy, and L.L. Díaz-Muñoz, H. Ghalla, A. Bonilla-Petriciolet, A. Ben Lamine, Understanding
factor group analysis of partially metal-doped phosphate materials, Spectrochim. the adsorption of Pb2+, Hg2+ and Zn2+ from aqueous solution on a lig-
Acta - Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 194 (2018) 230–240, https://doi.org/10. nocellulosic biomass char using advanced statistical physics models and density
1016/j.saa.2018.01.034. functional theory simulations, Chem. Eng. J. 365 (2019) 305–316, https://doi.org/
[44] X. Shen, Q. Wang, Y. Liu, W. Xue, L. Ma, S. Feng, M. Wan, F. Wang, C. Mao, 10.1016/J.CEJ.2019.02.052.
Manganese phosphate self-assembled nanoparticle surface and its application for [56] A.Q. Selim, L. Sellaoui, M. Mobarak, Statistical physics modeling of phosphate
superoxide anion detection, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1038/ adsorption onto chemically modified carbonaceous clay, J. Mol. Liq. 279 (2019)
srep28989. 94–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2019.01.100.
[45] I. Langmuir, The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, MICA AND [57] H.V. Lysychkyn, A.Y. Fadeev, A.A. Serdan, P.N. Nesterenko, P.H. Mynhalev,
PLATINUM, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 40 (1918) 1361–1403, https://doi.org/10.1021/ D.B. Furman, Khymyia Pryvytykh Poverkhnostnykh Soedynenyi, FYZMATLYT,
ja02242a004. Moscow, 2003.
[46] H.M.F. Freundlich, Adsorption in solution, Z. Phys. Chem. N. (N F) 57 (1906)
10