Individual Assignment- Ethics Case Study

Table of Contents
Individual Assignment- Ethics Case Study............................................................................1
Part I.......................................................................................................................................3
Executive Summary..........................................................................................................................3
Introduction.....................................................................................................................................3
CSR Report Selection:.......................................................................................................................5
Company Scale:................................................................................................................................6
Stakeholders:...................................................................................................................................6
Degree of Ambition:.........................................................................................................................7
Type of involvement:.......................................................................................................................7
Walmart’s size:................................................................................................................................................... 7
Walmart’s Stakeholders:.....................................................................................................................................8
Complexity of Issues:..........................................................................................................................................8
Ambition Level:...................................................................................................................................................9
Nature of Engagement:.......................................................................................................................................9
Stakeholders:....................................................................................................................................................10
Complexity of Issues:........................................................................................................................................10
Ambition Level:.................................................................................................................................................10
Nature of Engagement......................................................................................................................................10
Recommendations.........................................................................................................................11
PART II...................................................................................................................................14
Introduction...................................................................................................................................14
Land Rights and Territorial Claims:....................................................................................................................17
Cultural Heritage and Traditional Practices:......................................................................................................17
Socioeconomic Implications:............................................................................................................................17
Legal Challenges and Consent Issues:...............................................................................................................18
Broader Implications for Indigenous Peoples:..................................................................................................18
Inclusive Indigenous Engagement and Consent:...............................................................................................20
Diversification of Energy Sources and Sustainable Transition Plans:.................................................................21
Intensified Oversight and Transparent Reporting:............................................................................................21
Regional Economic Diversification:...................................................................................................................21
References:....................................................................................................................................22
Part I

Executive Summary

Walmart, a major global retail powerhouse, has consistently upheld its dedication to
carrying out Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives. The company's latest CSR report
for FY2022 highlights its ongoing commitment to ethical, sustainable, and responsible business
operations. Walmart is very much involved in many areas of corporate social responsibility, like
promoting sustainability, prioritizing ethical sourcing, fostering diversity and inclusivity, and
actively participating in community development. This report shows how Walmart is
contributing to reduce its environmental impact, promote community development, and
enhancing transparency in its operations. These initiatives highlight Walmart's desire to create a
beneficial influence while acknowledging the intricate obstacles it encounters as a leading global
retailer.

Although Walmart has made notable progress in its efforts towards corporate social
responsibility, it has still faced its fair share of controversies and obstacles. Throughout its
history, the company has encountered various objections regarding its treatment of employees,
including accusations of discriminatory practices based on gender and worries surrounding labor
practices. These problems have resulted in public and media scrutiny due to scandals related to
corporate social responsibility. Consequently, the company has had to take action and improve its
CSR efforts to deal with these concerns more effectively.

As Walmart progresses in its corporate social responsibility path, the company faces a
crucial moment where it is essential to connect its ambitious objectives with concrete steps and
measurable results. Walmart's success and reputation management in CSR will heavily rely on
improving transparency, fostering engagement with stakeholders, and effectively addressing
complex issues. This report examines Walmart's CSR reporting and the importance of its
elements, providing evidence-based suggestions to improve the company's CSR /ESG /
Sustainability reporting and overcome the obstacles it encounters.
Introduction

Walmart, a powerful multinational retail corporation, holds a significant position

in the worldwide retail sector, leaving a lasting impact on the realm of business. The company's
widespread existence, as a global retail giant, is a clear indication of its vast size and extensive
influence. However, in addition to its financial pursuits, Walmart has consistently shown a
unwavering dedication to upholding Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). This is evident in
their embodying of ethical, sustainable, and accountable business principles.

The most recent CSR/ESG/Sustainability report for the fiscal year 2022 by Walmart
serves as the central point of reference in this analysis. This report summarizes the company's
comprehensive strategy for tackling societal and environmental issues in line with international
guidelines for responsible corporate behavior.

Walmart covers a range of significant areas in its CSR efforts, including maintaining the
environment, sourcing ethically, promoting diversity and inclusion, engaging with communities,
and ensuring transparency in the supply chain. The report emphasizes the corporation's ambitious
objectives, plans, and practical measures it takes to diminish its environmental impact, assist
local communities, and promote a sustainable and fairer global environment.

In my research, I plan to use Ellerup Nielsen and Thomsen's CSR Reporting Analysis
Model to thoroughly evaluate Walmart's CSR reporting by examining its structure, information,
level of excellence, and impact. This approach will help us thoroughly analyze Walmart's CSR
report by considering various factors such as the company's size, involvement of stakeholders,
complexity of issues, level of ambition, and the manner of engagement. Our goal is to evaluate
the positive aspects and areas needing improvement in Walmart's CSR/ESG/Sustainability
reporting and provide well-researched suggestions to enhance it along with associated initiatives.

In the upcoming sections, I will examine Walmart's corporate social responsibility (CSR)
efforts and the importance of each element within the CSR Reporting Analysis Model. To wrap
up, I will provide practical suggestions backed by evidence, aiming to enhance the progress and
impact of Walmart's CSR initiatives. As I begin this journey, it is vital to emphasize the
significance of accountable and open CSR reporting in both the retail sector and the broader
business environment.

About the company - Walmart

Walmart, established by Sam Walton in 1962, has gained significant prominence as a

highly influential global retail and wholesale company. It has in different areas of work, such as
hypermarkets, supermarkets, and warehouse clubs.

Walmart, has both physical store network and online retail operations, which are
available in more than 25 countries. The company has a staff, with millions of employees around
the globe, and caters to a massive customer on a daily basis.

Walmart, being a prominent retail player, has continually established trends and standards
that other organizations aspire to emulate. The large scale and extent of its operations have
enabled cost efficiencies, leading to reduced costs and ultimately lower prices for consumers.
Walmart's unwavering dedication to providing affordable prices has attracted a large and devoted
customer following, solidifying its status as a frontrunner in the industry.

Walmart's impact extends beyond its economic presence in the worldwide retail and
wholesale industry. Walmart has attempted to be a responsible corporate citizen by responsibly
sourcing products, conserving the environment, and actively engaging with the community.
Hence, reaching to new standards by displaying its dedication to Corporate Social Responsibility
(CSR) and sustainability. The retail and wholesale sector's importance highlights the need to
analyze their CSR reporting practices, as it has the potential to establish industry standards and
shape how businesses address sustainability and social responsibility (García, 2022).

CSR Report Selection:

The selection process behind Walmart's choice and the reasons behind it.

After carefully evaluating various factors, I have chosen Walmart for the analysis of this
CSR/ESG/Sustainability report. Being one of the biggest players in the retail and wholesale
sectors, Walmart holds a crucial role in the industry due to its immense size and significant
impact on business methods. Its broad range of activities and dedication to sustainability make it
a captivating topic for examination. The decision to select Walmart is influenced by the
following elements.

Walmart's immense magnitude, backed by its extensive web of stores, suppliers, and
employees, establishes it as a prominent force in the international corporate arena. The
company's extensive influence and effect provide valuable understanding of the difficulties and
possibilities linked with corporate social responsibility in large retail businesses.

Walmart has been widely recognized in the corporate sphere for its strong focus on
sustainability and corporate social responsibility. The company has established lofty objectives in
terms of environmental and social responsibility, emphasizing the significance of its CSR
reporting as a vital tool for evaluating its advancements and influence. Examining Walmart's
report is important not just to comprehend the retail industry, but also to evaluate how major
corporations deal with intricate corporate social responsibility issues.

Walmart's reports on corporate social responsibility (CSR), environmental, social, and

governance (ESG), and sustainability are thorough, offering detailed information on its efforts,
accomplishments, and obstacles (Harrison, 2019). The extensive amount of information enables
a thorough examination of the company's CSR practices, making it a perfect topic for evaluation
utilizing Ellerup Nielsen and Thomsen's CSR Reporting Analysis Model.

Specific information outlined in the report:

 The report chosen for examination is Walmart's latest CSR/ESG/Sustainability report,
released for the fiscal year 2022. This report, which has been published by the company, covers
various subjects such as environmental responsibility, ethical procurement, community
involvement, and initiatives for diversity and inclusivity. It provides an overview of the
company's advancements in achieving its ambitious sustainability objectives, in accordance with
its "People, Planet, and Prosperity" framework that aims for a more conscientious and
sustainable future.

The report will be released on [Insert Publication Date] and it discusses the worldwide
operations of Walmart, including its retail and wholesale divisions, supply chain, and the effects
it has on different stakeholders and communities across the globe. The report's thoroughness and
comprehensiveness make it an excellent document for conducting a detailed analysis using the
CSR Reporting Analysis Model. Our intention in choosing this report is to evaluate Walmart's
efforts in corporate social responsibility, pinpoint areas of strength and weakness, and propose
evidence-based suggestions to improve their reporting on CSR/ESG/Sustainability and related
initiatives.

The model for analyzing CSR reporting is called the CSR Reporting Analysis Model.

Ellerup Nielsen and Thomsen's analysis model for CSR reporting is an extremely useful
framework that allows for a comprehensive evaluation of a company's Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) reporting. This model offers a methodical and all-encompassing approach
to assess the structure, substance, excellence, and overall impact of a company's CSR, ESG
(Environmental, Social, and Governance), and Sustainability reports. This model allows for a
comprehensive examination of a company's CSR practices by emphasizing specific contextual
factors, unveiling its positive attributes and opportunities for enhancement.

The essential elements of the CSR Reporting Analysis Model are as follows:
 The model created by Ellerup Nielsen and Thomsen comprises five essential elements
that provide unique perspectives on a company's corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting.

Company Scale:
This element examines how the size of the corporation impacts its strategy towards
corporate social responsibility. The extent and scope of a company's sustainability initiatives are
typically influenced by its size. Bigger companies possess the ability to create a greater positive
influence, yet they also encounter more intense examination and higher demands. When
examining this element, we take into account the ways in which Walmart's large-scale
international business and broad impact support its corporate social responsibility efforts.

Stakeholders:
It is essential to have a thorough understanding of how the company acknowledges and
interacts with different groups of stakeholders. This aspect examines how effectively a company
meets the needs, worries, and priorities of its stakeholders. Walmart serves a wide range of
stakeholders including customers, employees, etc. This factor assesses Walmart's effectiveness in
engaging with various groups and their transparency and responsiveness.
The level of complexity surrounding the issues is high.
Often, CSR requires tackling complex and intricate difficulties. This element evaluates
the company's approach in handling intricate CSR matters, like environmental sustainability,
ethical sourcing, and societal accountability. We carefully examine Walmart's CSR report to
assess the extent of detailed information it offers regarding its strategies, initiatives, and
transparency when dealing with complex obstacles.

Degree of Ambition:
Ambition plays a vital role in driving CSR initiatives. This component emphasizes the
company's desire and dedication to create a beneficial influence. We assess the precision and
extent of Walmart's goals, as depicted in its CSR disclosure. Walmart's commitment to
sustainability and ethical practices is evaluated based on its ambitious goals set under the
"People, Planet, and Prosperity" framework.
Type of involvement:
Genuine involvement with stakeholders, communities, and other entities is essential for
accomplishing corporate social responsibility goals. In this segment, we thoroughly examine
Walmart's involvement, giving special attention to the genuineness, comprehensiveness, and
openness of its partnerships and collaborations. This element investigates the particular influence
of these involvements in attaining corporate social responsibility goals.

Our goal is to use Ellerup Nielsen and Thomsen's CSR Reporting Analysis Model to
thoroughly examine Walmart's CSR reporting (Nielsen, & Thomsen, 2012). We will assess the
importance of each aspect and offer research-backed suggestions to improve Walmart's
CSR/ESG/Sustainability reporting and actions. This model provides a systematic method for
evaluating Walmart's CSR initiatives, emphasizing both its positive aspects and areas with room
for growth.

Analysis Using CSR Reporting Model:

Walmart’s size:
The colossal scale of Walmart plays a prominent role in shaping its CSR reporting. With its
massive presence in the retail and wholesale industry, Walmart faces both advantages and
obstacles in its attempts to carry out corporate social responsibility initiatives.

Walmart's considerable size provides it with ample chances to exert significant influence across
its entire supply chain and among its partners. This scale smartly enables the integration of
sustainable practices, such as the implementation of renewable energy and waste reduction, in
various operational aspects.
Challenges may arise in ensuring consistent CSR practices throughout all Walmart locations due
to the vast scale of the company's operations. It can be difficult to maintain consistent ethical and
environmental standards.

Walmart's ambitious goal of diminishing greenhouse gas emissions by one billion metric tons by
2030 showcases its strong dedication to the environment.
The charitable initiatives of the Walmart Foundation highlight the significant influence of the
company on nearby communities, which corresponds to its extensive scale and scope.

Walmart’s Stakeholders:
Walmart recognizes and actively involves a wide range of stakeholders in its CSR report,
including customers, employees, investors, and the communities it operates in.

Recognition of stakeholders: Walmart's report acknowledges the significance of involving

various groups of stakeholders and demonstrates a proactive stance towards ethical business
practices.
The report emphasizes programs such as the Women's Economic Empowerment Program,
showcasing the company's commitment to promoting gender diversity and inclusivity. The
report not only recognizes stakeholders, but also provides proof of participation and teamwork
with different groups, such as NGOs and industry partners.

There is evidence to support this claim.

Walmart's report provides comprehensive information on the various ways they engage with
customers, such as through the Spark City app and their involvement in community outreach
initiatives (Catherine, 2020). The report discusses the cooperation between various parties
involved in emergency response, providing assistance to communities in times of disasters.

Complexity of Issues:
Walmart's corporate social responsibility (CSR) report covers diverse and intricate CSR matters,
including ethical sourcing, ecological sustainability, and labor practices.

The report extensively explores intricate CSR subjects, providing valuable information on
Walmart's approaches, projects, and openness in tackling diverse challenges.
The report thoroughly examines intricate difficulties such as responsible sourcing, supply chain
transparency, and sustainable agriculture, offering comprehensive analysis and practical steps to
address them.
Weak Areas: Although the report provides strategies, it would be advantageous to include more
quantitative data to showcase advancements in intricate domains. Transparency would be
improved by incorporating specific timeframes and measurable effects.

The report thoroughly discusses Walmart's dedication to source sustainable products, assisting
small-scale farmers, and improving transparency within the supply chain.
Walmart's transparency in handling complex issues is evident in its detailed explanations of
initiatives like "Project Gigaton. "

Ambition Level:

Walmart's CSR report demonstrates the company's strong commitment to pursuing corporate
social responsibility with great ambition. The company has established ambitious goals for
sustainability and ethical sourcing.

Walmart showcases its strong aspiration by setting ambitious sustainability targets, such as
attaining complete dependence on renewable energy, minimizing waste to zero, and enhancing
the well-being of workers and farmers.
The report effectively demonstrates the company's determination to achieve ambitious goals by
2030, highlighting its strong commitment to creating a favorable influence across different areas.
The report lacks specific details about the strategies and initiatives employed to accomplish the
ambitious goals.

Walmart's bold commitment to environmental sustainability is demonstrated through its "Project

Gigaton" campaign, which seeks to lower emissions throughout its supply chain (Newswire,
2015).
To put it cleverly in different words: 5. The type of involvement or interaction that occurs.

Walmart's corporate social responsibility report demonstrates how the company interacts with
stakeholders, communities, and other organizations.
Nature of Engagement:
Walmart's report demonstrates genuine involvement via partnerships, collaborations, and
engagement with the community.
The report presents both qualitative and quantitative evidence that proves the positive results of
these engagements, showcasing their authenticity and influence.
Areas to improve include increasing transparency and effectively showcasing the specific
contributions made towards meeting CSR goals.
The report examines several favorable results of Walmart's involvements, including their
contributions to disaster relief and collaborations for sustainable agriculture.
The high quality of engagements is evidenced by the quantitative data on engagement outcomes,
which highlights the support provided to more than 750,000 businesses owned by women.

Findings
Walmart’s size:

Positive aspects- Walmart's wide global presence enables it to have a significant impact on
suppliers and partners, encouraging them to adopt ethical practices.
The company's large scale allows for cost savings and efficiency in their sustainability efforts.
Shortcomings- Ensuring consistent ethical and environmental standards can pose difficulties
within a vast organization.

Stakeholders:
Positive aspects- Walmart effectively engages customers through loyalty programs and
community outreach efforts.
The company acknowledges and backs the communities in which it conducts business, thereby
improving its standing with local stakeholders.
Areas of improvement- The CSR report could offer more detailed information on how the input
of stakeholders shapes the development of CSR strategies. Certain advocacy organizations may
find that their expectations have not been fully met, necessitating additional focus and
conversation.

Complexity of Issues:
Advantages- The report explores intricate subject matters and offers comprehensive
understandings of Walmart's responsible sourcing and environmental conservation strategies and
initiatives.
The company's commitment is highlighted by its transparent approach in tackling complex
challenges.
Limitations- The report would greatly improve by including more detailed data regarding the
specific advancements made in addressing intricate problems. To enhance transparency,
quantitative metrics should be included to demonstrate progress as the text outlines strategies.

Ambition Level:
Advantages- Walmart showcases its strong drive for success by establishing ambitious
sustainability objectives like attaining 100% renewable energy and eliminating waste entirely.
The company's ambitious goals for 2030 demonstrate its dedication to the "People, Planet, and
Prosperity" framework.
Areas of vulnerability- The report needs to make sure that lofty objectives are efficiently
transformed into tangible actions and measurable results. It is crucial to present tangible proof of
advancements made towards these objectives for the sake of clear and open reporting.
Although the report mentions ambitions, it lacks sufficient detail on the specific strategies and
initiatives being implemented to attain these objectives (Allen, 2008).

Nature of Engagement
Advantages- Walmart has a long-standing record of actively engaging with stakeholders,
positively impacting communities, and collaborating with NGOs to strengthen its corporate
social responsibility endeavors.
The report demonstrates Walmart's dedication to establishing valuable connections and
highlights multiple positive results that arise from these interactions.
Drawbacks- There might be opportunities to increase transparency and emphasize the specific
influence these involvements have in accomplishing CSR goals.
The report would be enhanced by incorporating qualitative and quantitative evidence that
illustrates the positive outcomes and impacts resulting from its partnerships and collaborations.

To put it simply, Walmart's CSR report showcases impressive strengths in terms of its size,
involvement with customers, management of difficult matters, drive, and the way it engages with
stakeholders. These capabilities showcase the company's dedication to ethical business conduct
and the beneficial effects it has on stakeholders and communities. Nevertheless, there are
opportunities to enhance the current situation by acquiring more precise data, fostering
transparency, and establishing a clearer connection between aspirational targets and feasible
initiatives. Taking steps to address these weaknesses can significantly improve Walmart's CSR
reporting by making it more effective and transparent.

Recommendations

 In order to mitigate the influence of its extensive scale on reporting CSR (Corporate
Social Responsibility), Walmart could contemplate the adoption of a universal CSR
framework. This framework aims to cover all activities and ensure consistent ethical and
environmental standards throughout the entire organization. A well-thought-out
implementation of this effort requires the creation of explicit protocols and strong
oversight systems to ensure that sustainability practices are followed and maintained. The
aim is to develop a CSR strategy that seamlessly encompasses different parts of the world
and upholds consistent CSR practices, irrespective of Walmart's operating region.

 It is crucial for Walmart to improve transparency and involvement with stakeholders to

enhance their CSR reporting. The company needs to prioritize enhancing transparency in
its approach to dealing with stakeholder concerns and feedback. Implementing regular
feedback mechanisms, such as conducting surveys, organizing focus groups, or
establishing advisory panels that include a diverse group of stakeholders, is a crucial
suggestion. Walmart can effectively demonstrate their dedication to incorporating
 stakeholder viewpoints and adjusting CSR initiatives by actively soliciting and
implementing their feedback.

 Walmart should improve its data-driven approach in order to effectively tackle intricate
CSR matters in its reporting. This involves presenting additional numerical information
showcasing the advancements made in addressing intricate problems. The company ought
to establish goals that are clear, quantifiable, and have set deadlines for various intricate
matters, like ethical procurement, transparent supply chains, and sustainable farming.
Providing a transparent account of accomplishments and establishing a clear connection
between specific initiatives and measurable results in the CSR report will offer
stakeholders a more precise and thorough understanding of Walmart's influence and
continuous endeavors.

 In order to emphasize its commitment to corporate social responsibility, Walmart should

clearly outline strategic approaches to attain its ambitious objectives. The report needs to
offer comprehensive information about the strategies and efforts being made to achieve
these ambitious goals. This entails clearly outlining the precise actions, significant
achievements, and specific deadlines for every objective, and allocating unambiguous
responsibility to specific departments or units within the company. Walmart can enhance
stakeholder trust in its dedication to sustainability by offering a clear plan that explains
how it intends to accomplish these ambitious objectives.

 It is crucial for Walmart to prioritize both increasing transparency and assessing the
effects of their interactions. The company can improve the clarity of its report by offering
measurable proof of the results achieved through its various involvements. This evidence
should effectively demonstrate the impact, whether it be social, economic, or
environmental, of these engagements by quantifying their results. Walmart must
additionally ensure that the impact assessments are in line with the targeted goals for each
case study, including enhancing the quality of life, minimizing emissions, or providing
aid to local communities. Walmart can enhance its image as a genuine and influential
 corporate entity by offering concrete proof of the beneficial results that emerge from their
involvements.

These comprehensive suggestions are intended to improve Walmart's

CSR/ESG/Sustainability reporting by targeting specific elements within each part of the CSR
Reporting Analysis Model. By incorporating these recommendations, Walmart not only enhances
transparency and accountability in CSR reporting but also demonstrates its dedication to
sustainability and responsible business conduct.

Conclusion

To conclude, the examination of Walmart's CSR/ESG/Sustainability reporting indicates a

combination of strengths and areas that can be enhanced. Walmart's extensive scale enables it to
have a meaningful and positive influence on sustainability. However, this vast size also poses
obstacles in maintaining consistent corporate social responsibility practices throughout its
operations. The company demonstrates a proactive stance towards responsible business practices
by effectively recognizing and involving a wide range of stakeholder groups. However, there are
chances to improve transparency and offer more comprehensive quantitative proof of the effects
of its involvements.

In the future, Walmart can improve its CSR reporting by adopting a standardized global
framework that ensures ethical and environmental standards remain consistent. A critical aspect
is to enhance clarity and involvement of stakeholders, paying close attention to integrating their
viewpoints through consistent channels of feedback. Additionally, enhancing the CSR reporting
by offering additional data on the advancement made in resolving intricate CSR matters and
outlining precise tactics to accomplish ambitious objectives will strengthen its impact. Enhancing
openness and evaluating the effectiveness of interactions can enhance Walmart's standing as a
genuine and influential corporate entity.
 The importance of accurate and impactful CSR reporting in the retail and wholesale
sector cannot be emphasized enough. The significance of Walmart as a leading player in the
industry reinforces the need for clear and comprehensive corporate social responsibility (CSR)
practices, which in turn establish higher benchmarks for ethical business conduct. It functions as
a crucial instrument for companies to communicate their dedication to ethical business
behaviors, encouraging openness, responsibility, and beneficial transformations. The presence of
well-executed CSR reporting can establish trust, bolster reputation, impact consumer choices,
and ultimately contribute to the development of a sustainable and responsible retail and
wholesale industry.
References:

Allen, A. (2008). Wal-Mart: suppliers must meet CSR goals. Supply Management, 13(22), 12.
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=bsu&AN=35232572&authtype=sso&custid=ns012452&s
ite=eds-live&scope=site&custid=ns012452

Anne Ellerup Nielsen, & Christa Thomsen. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Management and Marketing Communication: Research Streams and
Themes. Hermes, 25(49). https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v25i49.97737

Catherine Resche. (2020). Walmart’s communication techniques for sustaining stakeholder trust:
How CEOs answer critics and reassure stakeholders in their annual and CSR report
letters. Studies in Communication Sciences, 20(1), 93–107.
https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2020.01.008

Environmental, social, and Governance Highlights - Walmart corporate. (n.d.).

https://corporate.walmart.com/content/dam/corporate/documents/esgreport/fy2023-
walmart-esg-highlights.pdf

García, J. D., PhD. (2022). Walmart. Salem Press Encyclopedia.

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=ers&AN=89402704&authtype=sso&custid=ns012452&
 site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=ns012452

Harrison, V. (2019). Legitimizing private legal systems through CSR communication: a Walmart
case study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(3), 439–455.
https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-12-2018-0124

PR Newswire. (2015, April 15). Kellogg Employees Rally to “Fight Hunger. Spark Change.” PR
Newswire US. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=bwh&AN=201504150900PR.NEWS.USPR.DE79916&
authtype=sso&custid=ns012452&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=ns012452

PART II

Objective

The primary goal of this project is to extensively analyze the controversial Trans
Mountain Pipeline Expansion case study, a prominent and polarizing subject in Canada's
sustainability sphere. This thorough evaluation aims to delve into the various intricacies and
outcomes associated with the pipeline's expansion, conducting a meticulous analysis of its
environmental, societal, and economic impacts, as well as its historical background and
importance within Canada's energy sector. The numerous controversies surrounding its growth,
such as concerns regarding environmental harm such as oil spills, effects on marine life, and
contribution to climate change, along with the potential societal impact on local communities,
particularly indigenous populations, will be thoroughly examined. The purpose of the assignment
is to carefully investigate various perspectives and arguments about the Trans Mountain Pipeline
Expansion. The goal is to provide a comprehensive analysis and propose possible solutions or
approaches to address the conflicts and advance sustainable initiatives. This should be done
while considering the protection of the environment, social well-being, and economic
development. This objective involves providing a comprehensive and nuanced analysis of the
Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion conflict, highlighting its complexities, and proposing
potential strategies for future consideration and resolution.

Introduction

In recent times, the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion has become one of Canada's most
controversial and closely examined undertakings. This contentious case study has generated
fervent discussions, legal conflicts, and widespread protests due to its connection to economic
progress, preserving the environment, and protecting the rights of indigenous communities. The
Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion plays a significant role in the ongoing discussion about
sustainability. It gives an excellent chance to analyze the complex undercurrents in controversial
environmental and social matters.

The aspiring expansion of the Trans Mountain Pipeline aims to meet Canada's energy
demands by improving the transportation of oil from Alberta's oil sands to the Pacific coast.
Advocates struggle that it will improve the economic expansion, will generate the employment
opportunities, and strengthen the country's energy freedom. However, this case study has
confronted strong battle from environmental activists and inborn population. They are mainly
worried about the possible negative impacts on the environment.

This detailed case study examines the complex and diverse characteristics of the
controversy surrounding the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion. The analysis delves into the
historical background of the case study, its implications for sustainability, its impact on
indigenous communities, and the diverse perspectives that have influenced the ongoing
discussion. This analysis aims to gain a deep understanding of the controversy and propose
potential solutions and future sustainability considerations by examining these aspects
extensively. In an era where finding a harmony between economic advancement and
environmental stewardship is of utmost importance, the expansion of the Trans Mountain
Pipeline serves as a representative example of the wider sustainability dilemmas that Canada and
the globe confront (Junyk, 2020).

Thesis Statement

This assessment supports the expansion of the Trans Mountain Pipeline and provides backing for
emphasizing the crucial importance of inclusive and open reporting on Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) to tackle ecological issues, uphold indigenous rights, and promote
involvement within communities. Efficient implementation of corporate social responsibility is
essential in the energy industry to promote sustainable development and gain public confidence
in major construction projects.

Background

The expansion of the Trans Mountain Pipeline is a significant and intricate example of Canada's
energy situation, marked by a deep historical background and a controversial past. Trans
Mountain Pipeline was constructed in 1950s. It aimed to do transport from Edmonton, Alberta, to
the Westridge Marine Terminal in Burnaby, British Columbia for crude oil and refined petroleum
goods. This later became a very important pipeline of Canada's energy system as it allowed the
transportation of oil to the markets.
 Kinder Morgan presented expansion plan to create a second pipeline alongside the
existing one, resulting in a threefold increase in capacity to approximately 890,000 barrels per
day. The plan was to improve the effectiveness of transporting oil, create opportunities in new
markets, and enhance the country's economic outlook (CANTIERI, 2018). Nevertheless, the
case study faced significant controversy and resistance from different perspectives, resulting in a
sequence of legal, ecological, and political hurdles.

The main focus of the dispute regarding the pipeline expansion primarily pertains to
worries about the environment, the rights of indigenous people, and the potential impact on
climate change. Critics have expressed concerns about the increased likelihood of oil spills
occurring in environmentally vulnerable regions, particularly within British Columbia's marine
ecosystem. Indigenous communities, particularly those directly impacted by the planned path,
expressed concerns regarding their land ownership, preservation of their cultural heritage, and
potential negative impact on the environment within their territories. The case study's approval
process and level of consultation with indigenous communities were publicly contested through
legal disputes and demonstrations due to this opposition.

The case study's progression took various significant turns, with its initial approval,
subsequent cancellation, and eventual revival under government ownership. The Trans Mountain
Pipeline Expansion has come to represent the ongoing struggle between promoting economic
growth and preserving the environment. The extensive public debates, legal challenges, and
policy decisions surrounding the case study have highlighted the challenges faced by societies in
finding a balance between these two priorities.

Impact on sustainability

Environmental and Ecological Perils from Oil Spills:

The potential for oil spills and environmental risks is heightened with the increase of the
Trans Mountain Pipeline. The pipeline's route through a variety of landscapes, such as
ecologically fragile regions, wooded areas, and water crossings, increases the risk of leaks and
breaks. Oil spills present substantial dangers to both land and water ecosystems, jeopardizing the
variety of species, compromising soil quality, and polluting groundwater. Clearing up and
restoring the areas affected by oil spills requires a complex and resource-demanding process,
with long-lasting consequences for the affected regions. The possibility of significant harm to the
environment and disturbance to ecosystems is causing considerable concern among communities
and environmental organizations.

Marine Life and Coastal Regions Under Threat:

The marine terminal of the pipeline expansion, located near important marine habitats,
raises concerns about the wellbeing of marine life and coastal regions. There can be a accident
resulting in impacting the populations of fish, marine mammals, and seabirds. Coastal
ecosystems, like estuaries and intertidal zones, are at risk of being contaminated, putting the
fragile equilibrium of these habitats in jeopardy. The potential dangers may have ripple effects
throughout the food chain, affecting nearby communities that rely on marine resources.

Implications for Climate Change:

The impact of the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion on climate change is a crucial
issue. It enhances the generation and delivery of oil, which greatly contributes to the release of
greenhouse gases. The pipeline's connection to carbon emissions conflicts with both national and
global climate goals as it plays a crucial part in transporting oil sands crude. This inconsistency
prompts inquiries regarding Canada's dedication to decreasing emissions and shifting towards
sustainable energy sources. The urgent need to re-evaluate and carefully assess the case study's
alignment with sustainable practices is driven by its potential environmental impact on global
climate change dynamics.

Social and Cultural Ramifications:

The path of the pipeline through native lands has significant social consequences.
Indigenous communities raise valid concerns about their land rights, preservation of their
cultural heritage, and the possible disturbance to their customary way of living. Legal challenges
arise due to insufficient consultation, lack of consent, and violations of indigenous rights
protected by legal frameworks. These difficulties shed light on the intricate issues related to the
utilization of indigenous lands and the conflict between economic profits and the preservation of
indigenous cultural heritage, stressing the importance of thoroughly acknowledging and valuing
indigenous viewpoints (Newswire, 2014).

The Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion increased risks of oil spills and environmental
dangers, potential harming the marine ecosystems and coastal regions. It resulted in global
climate change, and societal consequences for indigenous communities.

Effects on Indigenous Communities

The proposed expansion of the Trans Mountain Pipeline has elicited major concerns and
triggered substantial opposition from indigenous communities residing along its planned
pathway. A thorough investigation of the effects on native populations unveils a wide range of
complex difficulties, specifically in terms of territorial entitlements, safeguarding cultural
heritage, and the wider consequences for indigenous groups (Tuttle, 2021).

Land Rights and Territorial Claims:

Throughout history, indigenous communities have resided in and relied on the lands and
territories where the pipeline expansion is scheduled to occur. Numerous regions possess
immense cultural, spiritual, and historical value to indigenous communities. The building and
running of the pipeline have caused worries regarding land ownership and disputes over
territories. The Indigenous communities claim that the progress of the case study encroaches
upon their land and resource privileges, possibly violating their authority and right to determine
their own future. These worries also apply to land displacement, as the case study might
necessitate taking over native lands, thus worsening past wrongdoings.

Cultural Heritage and Traditional Practices:

Indigenous cultures have a profound connection with the surrounding natural world. The
pipeline's route through indigenous lands poses a risk to the preservation continuation of
ancestral traditions. The loss of cultural identity can occur when ancestral lands, sacred sites, and
cultural resources are disrupted or disturbed. Indigenous communities are expressing worry over
the possible decline of their customary activities like hunting, fishing, and collecting resources.
These practices hold immense importance for preserving their cultural heritage as well as
ensuring their survival and overall welfare.

Socioeconomic Implications:
The consequences of the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion have far-reaching effects on
the overall social and economic welfare of indigenous communities. Although supporters of the
case study highlight the potential for job creation and economic opportunities, concerns
regarding its impact on traditional livelihoods and the environment cast doubt on its future
socioeconomic effects. Native communities frequently depend on the land and its resources to
sustain their economy, and the construction and functioning of the pipeline could potentially
interfere with these pursuits.

Legal Challenges and Consent Issues:

Indigenous communities are utilizing legal means to contest the authorization of the
pipeline expansion and assert their rights. The legal challenges are greatly influenced by the
principle of "free, prior, and informed consent" from the UN Declaration on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Indigenous communities contend that the government's
consultation processes have overlooked their concerns and have not obtained their consent for
the case study in a satisfactory manner.

Broader Implications for Indigenous Peoples:

The case study of the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion is not an isolated incident but
represents a larger problem impacting indigenous communities globally. This emphasizes the
continuous push for acknowledgment of indigenous rights, safeguarding of cultural heritage, and
the resolution of historical injustices. The case study's controversy has sparked camaraderie
among native communities and brought global focus to the issues of indigenous rights and
environmental equity.
In essence, the effects of the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion on native communities
involve intricate matters related to their land ownership, safeguarding their culture, and wider
consequences for indigenous populations. This case study holds significant importance for
indigenous rights advocacy and environmental justice movements in Canada and beyond, as it
covers legal, cultural, economic, and social aspects of indigenous life.

Concessions and Refutations:

Concession 1: Economic Benefits and Job Creation:

One reason to support this idea is the positive impacts it can have on the economy and
employment opportunities.
Those who are against the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion claim that the projected
economic advantages and employment opportunities linked to the case study are exaggerated.
According to them, the pipeline's effect on job opportunities is short-term, and the projected
economic benefits might not occur as anticipated. In reaction, supporters highlight the possibility
of generating employment opportunities during the building stage and argue that the initiative
has the potential to boost the economy by increasing energy exports.
Refutation 1:
Construction of pipeline expands Canada's energy industry and gained access to new
markets which may bring economic benefits, it is crucial to also take into account the long-term
economic consequences. Job opportunities extend beyond the pipeline's construction, as ongoing
maintenance, operations, and related sectors will consistently generate employment.
Furthermore, the enhancement of energy exports has the potential to positively impact the
economy by fostering economic expansion, consequently generating indirect employment
opportunities and tax income that can be advantageous to local communities.

Concession 2: Environmental Risks and Oil Spills:

Critics claim that the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion presents significant
environmental dangers, such as the risk of oil spills and the pollution of vulnerable ecosystems.
They argue that the case study's pathway through ecologically delicate regions worsens these
dangers. In reply, advocates emphasize the rigorous safety precautions in operation, such as
advanced pipeline technology and plans for immediate action, aimed at reducing the likelihood
of leaks and lessening the impact on the environment.

Refutation 2:
Legitimate concerns exist regarding environmental risks, requiring strict precautions to
be taken. Supporters recognize that there is always some level of risk associated with any
infrastructure case study. It is essential to emphasize the industry's dedication to improving safety
protocols, surveillance, and swift action in case of any unfortunate occurrences. The strict
regulations and safety measures, along with improved spill detection and containment
technology, ensure that all possible precautions are taken to reduce environmental damage. The
discussion should prioritize the attainment of optimal safety measures and the ongoing
enhancement of environmental protections.

Concession 3: Indigenous Rights and Consent:

Per Critics, expansion of the Trans Mountain Pipeline ignores the rights of indigenous
people and lacks consent from the indigenous communities impacted. They cite the United
Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) as a guideline that requires
the need for consent that is well-informed, given in advance, and freely given. In reply,
supporters argue that there has been thorough consultation, and the government has followed the
proper procedures in giving approval to the case study.

Refutation 3.
The matter concerning indigenous rights and consent is intricate and delicate. Although
there has been consultation, critics argue that it has not met the standards specified in the
UNDRIP. It is crucial to acknowledge the importance of valuing and honoring indigenous
viewpoints, and more active involvement is needed to effectively address their issues. The
government and industry need to collaborate closely with indigenous communities to safeguard
their rights, address their concerns, and genuinely obtain their consent, following international
norms.

Concession 4: Climate Change and Fossil Fuels:

 Critics argue that the expansion of the Trans Mountain Pipeline is in contradiction with
Canada's climate objectives and its global obligations to decrease greenhouse gas emissions.
They claim that the case study maintains the dependence on fossil fuels and obstructs the shift
towards a more environmentally friendly economy. Proponents contend that the case study is in
line with Canada's energy requirements and emphasize that addressing climate issues goes
beyond just one undertaking.

Refutation 4:
The valid concern lies in the potential climate change consequences of expanding the
pipeline. Although the case study is involved in the transportation of fossil fuels, it represents
only a small component of a broader energy framework. The shift towards a low-carbon
economy requires extensive measures such as funding in renewable energy, implementing carbon
capture technologies, and adopting sustainable methods. Finding a harmonious equilibrium
between promoting economic progress and ensuring environmental sustainability presents a
worldwide obstacle. We should primarily address the wider strategy of the energy transition and
consider how projects such as this one contributes to a sustainable future.

When examining these contrasting perspectives, it is crucial to recognize the legitimacy

of concerns while highlighting the significance of strong regulations, strict safety protocols,
active involvement with affected communities, and a holistic approach towards balancing
environmental and economic sustainability. The ongoing debate surrounding the Trans Mountain
Pipeline Expansion exemplifies the larger global dilemma of balancing economic progress with
environmental conservation.

Solutions and Future Considerations

Enhanced Environmental Protections and Technological Innovations:

In order to tackle worries about environmental hazards, the Trans Mountain Pipeline
Expansion should consistently allocate resources towards advanced technologies and approaches
to enhance the prevention of oil spills and boost emergency response capabilities. This entails
implementing sophisticated systems for identifying leaks, conducting stricter inspections, and
consistently maintaining the pipeline to guarantee its integrity. Collaborative research involving
environmental organizations and indigenous communities can yield creative approaches to
mitigate environmental consequences. The success of this method depends on the oil and gas
industry's ability to innovate and adjust, but the main hurdle is the requirement for substantial
financial investments in order to incorporate advanced technologies.

Inclusive Indigenous Engagement and Consent:

An important issue at hand is the absence of genuine consultations and consent
regarding indigenous matters. To tackle this issue, future efforts should give importance to
proactive and open communication with indigenous communities. One potential approach could
involve forming partnerships with local communities, sharing profits, and integrating traditional
ecological knowledge into environmental evaluations. Encouraging the involvement of
Indigenous communities in activities such as monitoring, decision-making, and emergency
response plans can significantly enhance collaborative partnerships. The success of this solution
relies on the government, industry, and indigenous communities being cooperative and willing to
work together. The primary obstacle lies in effectively navigating intricate negotiations and
successfully reaching a consensus that upholds the rights of indigenous people.

Diversification of Energy Sources and Sustainable Transition Plans:

To address worries regarding the case study's impact on climate change, it is important to
pursue an all-encompassing strategy for diversifying energy sources. This includes noteworthy
funding in renewable energy systems, carbon capture and storage technologies. To create a plan,
government and industry should work together for shifting towards a low-carbon economy. This
should guarantee that the growth of fossil fuel infrastructure along with sustainability targets.
The difficulty lies in finding a suitable equilibrium between the current energy needs and the
shift towards more environmentally friendly options.

Intensified Oversight and Transparent Reporting:

To address environmental and safety issues, it is vital to have consistent and unbiased
monitoring along with clear and open reporting of pipeline activities. Conducting frequent audits,
evaluations, and making safety records openly available can improve accountability and
transparency. Independent organizations unrelated to the parties involved can participate in
assessing safety procedures and the ecological consequences. The viability of this method relies
on the industry and regulators' dedication to transparent reporting. The difficulty lies in
guaranteeing that the monitoring and reporting procedures are truly unbiased and thorough.

Regional Economic Diversification:

In order to alleviate worries regarding the lasting effects on indigenous communities'
socioeconomic situation, it is important to create strategies for regional economic diversification.
For giving indigenous communities an alternative to their traditional livelihood, investments in
education, training, and the creation of alternative economic prospects can be offered. This can
be successful if government and the industry cooperates in promoting initiatives for economic
diversification. The difficulty lies in efficiently executing these plans and guaranteeing that they
result in real advantages for the communities involved.

In summary, achieving a resolution for the controversies surrounding the Trans Mountain
Pipeline Expansion necessitates a comprehensive strategy that harmonizes economic interests,
environmental conservation, and indigenous rights. The effectiveness of these solutions relies on
the joint effort of all parties involved and adequate resource allocation. The main difficulty is to
discover mutual agreement and handle the intricate nature of dealing with a diverse range of
issues and interests.

Conclusion

To summarize, the discussion regarding the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion highlights the
complex relationship between economic benefits, environmental issues, indigenous rights, and
societal welfare. The disputes and discussions highlight the crucial significance of having
successful reporting on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in big projects, specifically in the
energy industry. Numerous important discoveries have surfaced during the discussion,
underscoring the vital importance of practicing responsible and transparent Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) in tackling complex challenges.
 To begin with, the situation surrounding the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion
exemplifies the fundamental connection between corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices
and sustainable development within the extractive industries. Adequate corporate social
responsibility reporting acts as an essential way to recognize and lessen possible environmental
hazards, promote involvement with communities, and deal with concerns related to indigenous
rights. The controversies surrounding the case study emphasize the need for continuous,
extensive corporate social responsibility initiatives, especially in industries with significant
effects like energy and infrastructure.

To build the trust with stakeholders and industry supporters, communities and groups it is
important to have strong CSR reporting. By transparent reporting, engaging stakeholders and
following the environmental standards, public confidence in projects such as the Trans Mountain
Expansion can be gained.

The controversy surrounding the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion highlights the
importance of detailed corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting, which plays a crucial role
in guiding ethical decision-making, minimizing risks, and ensuring accountability. The concepts
of CSR and sustainable development are crucial guidelines for managing the intricate balance
between economic growth, conservation of the environment, and overall societal welfare. In the
future, the quality, transparency, and dedication to responsible corporate social responsibility
(CSR) practices will play a crucial role in determining the success and credibility of big projects.
This will require finding a careful equilibrium between advancement and societal obligations.
References:

CANTIERI, J. (2018). THIS SPACE HERE: Tribes Build a Traditional Watch House to Stop
Kinder Morgan Pipeline Expansion: And since the fall, Tiny House Warriors have been
putting homes in the path of the pipeline. BC Studies, 198, 7–12.
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=asn&AN=131065516&authtype=sso&custid=ns0124
52&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=ns012452

Canada Newswire. (2014, June 26). Economic impact of Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion
Project flows across Canada. Canada Newswire.
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=bwh&AN=201406261200CANADANWCANADAPR.
C2154&authtype=sso&custid=ns012452&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=ns012452

Junyk, M. (2020). Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion: Overview. Canadian Points of View:
Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion, 1–3 https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=p3h&AN=142392055&authtype=sso&custid=ns0124
52&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=ns012452

Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion: Guide to Critical Analysis. (2020). Canadian Points of
View: Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion, 1–3
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=p3h&AN=142392058&authtype=sso&custid=ns0124
52&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=ns012452

Tuttle, R. (2021). Indigenous Group Seeks Full Ownership of Trans Mountain

Pipeline. Bloomberg.Com, N.PAG.
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=bsu&AN=150764898&authtype=sso&custid=ns0124
52&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=ns012452