Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCMR WP 64 Motivations of UK Students 260511
SCMR WP 64 Motivations of UK Students 260511
net/publication/257305557
CITATIONS READS
3 1,099
4 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by Jill Ahrens on 22 May 2014.
Working Paper No 64
Máiréad Dunne
Centre for Higher Education Research, University of Sussex
December 2010
Abstract
This paper examines the attitudes and plans of Year 13 (final-year secondary school or ‘upper
sixth form’) pupils towards studying at university abroad. Our main empirical base is a
questionnaire survey of more than 1400 Year 13 pupils in a stratified sample of schools and
sixth-form colleges, both state and independent sector, in two parts of England (Brighton and
Sussex, and Leicester and Leicestershire). In addition, 15 face-to-face interviews were taken
with teachers and HE advisers in the schools surveyed, and follow-up telephone interviews
were made with 20 pupils from the questionnaire survey. The objectives of the research were,
firstly, to discover the proportions of school-leavers who are applying to study at a non-UK
university, or who had considered doing so but not actually gone ahead with the application,
and which countries and universities they were attracted to. Against this orientation to (think
about) studying abroad as the key dependent variable, the paper analyses several independent
variables, based on quantitative data drawn from the questionnaire results and informed by
insights from the qualitative interviews. These include pupils’ academic profile, type of school,
gender and ethnic heritage, parental socio-economic class, and family and personal links (prior
residence abroad, travel experiences, friends or relatives who had studied abroad etc.). Results
show that students applying abroad, or who considered this option, are academic high-
achievers and high-aspirers, more likely to come from independent schools, have parents who
are in the higher socio-occupational classes (managers, directors, professionals, teachers etc.)
and who are themselves graduates, and have family links and extensive travel experience
abroad. Females are slightly more likely to consider the study-abroad option. The relationship
with ethnicity is not clear, except that foreign-domiciled non-UK nationals have a greater
propensity to apply to non-UK universities, as do UK-nationals studying at international schools.
Overall, however, and for all groups surveyed and interviewed, the study-abroad strategy
appears to be supplementary to the dominance of what are widely perceived as the best UK
universities, above all Oxford, Cambridge, and the other Russell Group research-intensive
universities.
5
to complete on average, with a range insights based on the interviewees’
between 10 and 20 minutes. It was filled in accumulated experience of monitoring HE
on the hard-copy version, either in special applications over many years. The staff
sessions (such as morning assembly) interviews were recorded (permission was
organised by the schools with the always sought, and granted in all cases)
researchers present, or distributed via tutor and subsequently transcribed. The
groups, and collected by the researchers on interviewees were offered the chance to
a later visit or posted back to the research check the transcripts for accuracy, which a
team at the University of Sussex. The on- few respondents did, and the transcripts
site methods worked very well on the whole, revised accordingly.
and we are extremely grateful to the In order to conform to ethical approval
schools for facilitating this exercise. guidelines and to undertakings to ensure
The questionnaire was designed to provide individuals’ confidentiality and school
useful data to answer, or at least shed light anonymity, we do not name interviewees or
on, the research aims listed above. The identify schools. In the analysis which
questionnaire was divided into five sections follows, schools (and interviewees within
that mainly involved closed questions, each school) are coded in the following
simple to tick or write a one-word response, manner (L stands for Leicester(shire); S for
with a few spaces for elaborations where it Sussex, including Brighton):
was thought necessary or useful. Section 1
documents the respondents’ current
studies: A2 and AS levels or other L1 Independent day school, girls
qualifications. Section 2 records past L2 Independent day school, girls
studies, mainly GCSE grades. Section 3 L3 Independent day school, boys
asks the important questions about plans L4 Ind. day/boarding school, mixed
to study at university, including universities L5 Ind. day/boarding school, mixed
applied for. The key question here is 3.3 L6 State sixth-form college, mixed
which asks about applying to study abroad L7 State sixth-form college, mixed
– whether respondents are actually doing
this; or whether they considered applying S1 Ind. day/boarding school, girls
abroad, but then decided not to. Other S2 Ind. day/boarding school, girls
questions in section 3 elicit motivation for S3 Ind. day/boarding school, mixed
(not) applying to study abroad, levels of S4 Ind. day/boarding school, mixed
information and guidance available etc. S5 Ind. day/boarding school, mixed
Section 4 asks about pupils’ previous links S6 Ind. day/boarding school, mixed
outside the UK (travel, holidays, residence S7 State FE college, mixed
abroad), and section 5 collects general S8 State sixth-form college, mixed
demographic data, both for respondents S9 State sixth-form college, mixed
and their parents, including the education S10 State comprehensive, mixed
and occupations of the latter.3 S11 State comprehensive, mixed
The second research instrument was a
target-sample of staff interviews. We The staff interview extracts will use the
interviewed, in most institutions where the above codes. In addition, and in order to
questionnaire was administered, the cover certain aspects of the situation in
corresponding local ‘key informant’ – London, we interviewed one HE adviser at a
usually the head of sixth form, HE adviser or large Inner-London sixth-form college. This
other such strategic person. These interview is coded IL1. For the small sample
interviews, which usually lasted between 20 of follow-up pupil interviews, we add ‘p’ to
minutes and one hour, yielded useful the code as follows: Lp1, Sp3 etc.
Referring back to Table 1, it will be seen
3The questionnaire is available to bona fide researchers that our target samples for schools in
on request: please contact Russell King or Jill Ahrens.
6
England were 700 questionnaire returns in How to separate out these two categories of
Leicester(shire), 700 for Brighton and respondents was not simple. It was decided
Sussex, 700 state-school pupils, 700 not to ask the explicit nationality question
independent-sector pupils, 700 males and because of it potential sensitivity in certain
700 females, all subdivided into evenly- cases – pupils may have been uncertain
matched quotas of 350 and 175 – e.g. 350 over their precise nationality, or be refugees
state-sector respondents in Leicester, made or asylum-seekers. Accordingly we
up of 175 males and 175 females. The fact identified the non-UK-domiciled and foreign
that these targets were exceeded by some nationals indirectly by their answers to
margin meant that a random selection of several questions: if they had been resident
completed questionnaires for coding was outside the UK for more than ten years
drawn from some schools where excessive (question 4.2), if they had been born
numbers of questionnaires were filled in.4 outside the UK (question 5.4), their ethnic
origin (i.e. other than White-UK/Irish,
At this point we need to spell out a crucial
question 5.5.), their parents’ residence
refinement which we make when
(5.6), plus any clues given in ‘open’
presenting the results pertaining to the key
answers to other questions (e.g. ‘I may
question: ‘Have you ever thought about
return to Hong Kong for university’).
applying to a non-UK university?’ (question
3.3 in the questionnaire). Three responses As a result of this refinement to our
are possible to this question: ‘Yes, and I am respondent categories, we have alongside
in the process of applying’; ‘Yes, but in the the ‘non-abroad-oriented’ respondents
end I decided not to apply’; and ‘No’. The (those who answered ‘No’ to question 3.3),
refinement concerns the distinction two comparator samples. We term these as
between UK-domiciled pupils and non-UK- follows:
domiciled pupils. The latter group consists 1. The ‘standard sample’ – this is the
primarily, if not exclusively, of foreign- number of respondents in the overall
national pupils who have been sent to sample (n=1400) who answered
England as boarders or in the care of positively to the study-abroad question,
guardians in order to access British either in terms of actually applying to
secondary and probably higher education. study abroad (n=101) or of having
These students are, in a sense, moving in thought about it but then not done so
the opposite direction to the UK students (n=182).
considering moving to study abroad, who
are the main focus of this research. We 2. The ‘narrow sample’ – as above but
found that foreign pupils sent to schools in minus those who are, on the
the UK are also aiming to access (good) questionnaire evidence, highly likely to
British universities but, given their be non-UK students (n=159, so the
international background, are also more total narrow sample becomes 1241).
likely to consider applying to universities This reduces the two ‘positive’
abroad as well.5 response categories to n=50 and
n=154 respectively.
To clarify these two categories a little
4 It was tempting to code up all completed questionnaires; further: 1 is broadly representative of the
however this would have unbalanced the carefully
stratified nature of the total sample. For instance, we had
Year 13 pupil population, with the caveat
a greater excess of questionnaires from Leicester than for that the stratified sample division (50 per
Sussex, and for state schools than for independents. cent each for state and independent sector
5 We were not alone in being surprised at the existence of
Table 2 Positive answers to the question 'Have you thought about applying to a
non-UK university?
Note: For sample sizes, the first n = standard sample, the second figure is the
narrow sample.
9
any. I can’t remember the last time we prestigious ‘public schools’, especially
had an application to an overseas those with a strong presence of boarders.
institution… it’s so rare you would Four examples, two each from schools in
notice it (S7). Leicestershire and Sussex:
These answers are all the more significant OK, the general profile is that there are
because they are from informants relatively few students that go… to
representing large institutions – amongst overseas universities. There are
the largest we surveyed. usually half a dozen a year that
express an interest in American
From the independent sector the answers
universities. Last year we had
were a bit more varied. Whilst some,
someone go to McGill, that was partly
especially the smaller schools containing
because he had Canadian
wholly or mainly day-pupils, reinforced the
connections. This year we have
‘hardly any’ picture given above, the private
somebody… who is actually half-
boarding schools have a slightly different
Australian… and he is going to go to
story to tell. L1 is Head of Sixth Form in a
university in Australia (L4).
small independent day girls school:
… if I think about the last few years,
In the seven years I have been here in
America was their intended destination
post, none have gone. We have had
[of those who apply overseas] and they
experience of Erasmus years, but
tend to be quite a broad range of
nobody has actually gone abroad to
universities, not just the ones we
study (L1).
know; universities that I would never
Other, larger independents, but still (mainly) have heard of… The nations [of
day schools, were not much different: destination] tend to be America and
I would say that it is extremely small. I the Irish Republic… but we are talking
have one year 12 student currently small, very small numbers (L5).
looking into going to Art School in We’ve had a fair number, obviously
Bilbao in Spain. Her mother is Spanish smaller than the ones that go to British
and she is a fluent Spanish speaker universities. I would say 5 or 6 every
and she is quite seriously looking at year [to the United States] and we
that… We have one or two pupils with have had girls go to Australia and
an Irish background who look into the Canada. I think it is partly the make-up
Irish universities but as yet I am not of the students we have, because they
aware that any have gone. I usually in are all very international. So the idea of
every year get one or two enquiries going abroad is already part of their
about American universities, but it make-up. But the American
doesn’t materialise (L2). universities are obviously the second
Well, very few in fact. We have a choice… not the second choice but the
handful of overseas pupils who might alternative to the UK universities. [As
look at going back to their home for European universities] very few,
country. But in terms of UK born and hardly any I think (S1).
bred pupils, some of them might be Not that many really… single figures.
interested in going to America. Very, There are quite a lot of possibilities in
very few might be interested in America and really not any applications
mainland Europe or something like to any European universities… We
Australia, but apart from that they all have many talented sportsmen who
go for UK universities (S3). could be applying to American
The schools where there does seem to be a universities with scholarships… but
stronger (but still very much minority-scale) they are not doing that in significant
interest in studying abroad are the more numbers (S4).
10
Table 3 Study abroad by school type: state vs. independent sector
To round off this first series of interviews on evidence is mainly impressionistic rather
numbers applying (and going) abroad, we than statistical.
can hear from the HE adviser to a large, Second, applications might be made
ethnically diverse, sixth-form college in without the teachers knowing. The teachers
Inner London: and advisers are mostly responsible for
Only a few end up going abroad. I would managing the UCAS system of applying to
say out of a year group of 400 or 500 UK institutions of higher education. Pupils
students we would get only a handful might be working with the help of their
who would actually go ahead and parents, friends or private tutors to make
apply… maybe one per cent… Usually applications abroad, unbeknownst to their
[to] America, occasionally Canada. schools. Or, pupils might be planning a Gap
Occasionally we get the sports Year and thinking of applying abroad at a
scholarship type student (IL1). later stage. A few of the teachers admitted
to these possibilities:
Although few of the staff interviewees were
able to give precise percentages on how So when they go off and make their
many pupils had applied (or had actually own research [referring to those
gone) to study abroad, we have the looking for sports scholarships
impression that the figures and estimates abroad], we don’t know if they made
given (‘hardly any’, ‘only a handful’ etc.), the application. If it’s not through the
when measured against the sizes of the normal UCAS process we’re not going
schools’ university-applicant cohorts, were to pick them up (S9).
less than 1-2 per cent, and therefore below One thing I haven’t mentioned so far…
the outcomes given on Table 2. these medical schools in Prague that
If there is a discrepancy, why might pupils teach in English… We’ve had a few
have higher study-abroad inclinations than boys who haven’t made the cut
their teachers think they have? We suggest expressing an interest in them, so
a number of reasons. these would be post-A-level
applications… A few boys looked into it
First, teachers were more focused on the
and one boy applied and I know he
relatively few cases of (former) pupils who
didn’t take up the offer because he
had actually gone to study abroad, whereas
was going to take a Gap Year instead. I
the questionnaire respondents were
have no idea if he is intending to re-
replying on the basis of thinking of studying
apply (L3).
abroad. If we consider the ‘middle ground’
of those who had actually made We are led to conclude that this factor of
applications, we can observe more teacher/adviser ignorance must be very
congruence, although the teachers’ relevant. As the two quotes above indicate,
11
teachers’ main task, and hence their socio- stressing in particular that it is often a
psychological (if not financial) ‘reward’, is to passing phase whereby interest dissipates
get their pupils into (good) UK universities. when the actual form-filling stage arrives.
There is probably no reward for placing … we start with the students in their
them abroad, and this is mainly outside first year here when they are doing
their job remit as they see it. their AS levels… we start doing some
Third, pupils may have inserted a positive intensive work with them in January
answer to question 3.3 on a partial and February and at that stage you’ll
misinterpretation that it could also refer to find quite a number of them that will
UK degrees with a year or semester at a say ‘Yeah, I’m interested in the idea of
foreign university.7 Certainly many teachers studying abroad’ – that is their first
and advisers – virtually all of them in fact – answer… [But] when they get to the
mentioned that the ‘Erasmus route’ of nitty-gritty stage of actually applying…
studying abroad for up to a year within the something seems to happen by the 9
framework of a UK degree was a more or 10 months later when they start
attractive proposition than doing the entire applying. Maybe it’s just the realities of
degree at a foreign university. Two typical distance and families and things like
quotes: that… I also think by the nature of the
way the UCAS application timescales
They are interested in studying abroad,
work, it dominates everything, so they
they are interested in universities that
have to sort it out… (IL1).
offer an Erasmus year… They like the
idea of having a British base and of You can certainly have students… I
having a year in the middle and have students come to me and talk
spending it abroad (L1). about applying to America, but usually
nothing comes of it. It’s all talk and
I think that those who have done
they end up applying for home
Modern Languages are more likely to
universities (S7).
apply to a UK university that offers the
Erasmus scheme or would be looking Overall, we are unable to gauge the precise
to a university that offers a one-year relevance of any of these four factors in
placement abroad as part of the boosting the pupils’ feelings and actions
degree course [than apply to do a full towards studying abroad beyond what the
programme abroad] (L5). teachers seem to be saying. However, it is
our considered opinion that the main
Fourth, whilst recording students who have
reason for the discrepancy is simply that
left to study abroad or who are actually
the teachers do not know what is
applying to do so is a relatively objective
happening with regard to international
measure, the notion of having ‘thought of’
flows. This is a disappointing finding in one
studying abroad is far more imprecise,
sense, but it does have important policy
ranging from serious consideration and
implications. The key policy question is
active research into the options, to a
whether teachers should be encouraged to
fleeting thought or passing whim. No doubt
support international applications to non-
the relatively much greater share of
UK universities. If this route saves the tax-
students (around one eighth) who ticked
payer money, and if it helps to train a
the response ‘I thought about it but decided
British-national educational elite via study
not to apply abroad’ embraces a range of
at the world’s leading universities, then the
depth of ‘thought’. Teacher and adviser
interviews again shed light on this process, answer is ‘yes’. If, on the other hand, there
is concerns about a 1960s-style ‘brain-
7 The questionnaire wording was quite clear that this is not
drain’, then the answer might be ‘no’. It is
what is being asked, but given the circumstances in which also regrettable that there is no national (or
the survey was carried out – often in a crowded hall with international) database which makes it
limited time to think and concentrate – we cannot
discount this possibility.
possible to know how many school-leavers
apply and finally go to study abroad.
12
State vs. independent sector the fee-paying parents have invested in.
The key term which cropped up in every
Prior quotes given in the earlier sections of
independent school interview, and in the
this report have indicated that applying to
more academically oriented sixth forms,
study abroad seems to be heavily
was Russell Group, referring to the well-
associated with independent or private
established research universities –
schools. Interviews with state-school staff
generally large universities in big or
often referred to the likelihood of greater
medium-sized cities. Of course, Oxford and
numbers from the independent schools
Cambridge are the prime targets for the
being interested in studying at university
best students, and the numbers getting in
abroad, and these latter schools are also
to Oxbridge are seen as a key indicator of a
where the bulk of the overseas boarding
school’s prestige.
pupils are enrolled.
We illustrate some of these characteristics
Table 3 provides the statistical evidence.
by two interview extracts from the Leicester
We can see that, for respondents applying
survey, one from an independent school
abroad in the standard sample, the
one from a state-sector sixth-form college.
independent-sector rate is four times that
Setting aside the small minority of pupils
of the state sector: 11.6 vs. 2.9 per cent.
who apply abroad, these interview quotes
However, moving across to the narrow
exemplify the clear, but differentiated,
sample, where the non-UK pupils, who are
geographical component that exists in
far more numerous in independent schools,
application patterns.
are filtered out, we can observe that this
differential narrows appreciably to 5.5 vs. For Leicester independent schools, the
2.8 per cent. For the other variant answer – main targets, beyond Oxbridge, were the
‘Yes, I thought about applying abroad, but Russell Group universities ranging along the
decided not to go ahead’ – the inter-sector M1/A1 corridor, from the London University
contrast remains clear, but the contrast is colleges up to Nottingham, Sheffield, Leeds
not so strong, especially for the narrow etc.
sample. However, given the fuzziness of the … 100 per cent go to university. We
notion of ‘thought about it’ noted earlier, are a small selective school and they
the key comparison should be those pupils are quite high achievers… Without it
who actually apply to study abroad; and ever being stated it is part of the
here the differential is sharper, with
culture… part of the expectation of the
independent-sector pupils about twice as school that you go to university… The
likely to apply abroad as state-sector pupils majority are Russell Group
in the narrow sample, and 50 per cent universities… the most popular last
more likely to think about this option but
year were Birmingham, Nottingham is
not actually apply. very popular… Sheffield, Leeds… these
It is perhaps useful to include here a few are the universities… We also get every
comments on the patterns of university year three or four into Oxford or
applications within the UK. Although this is Cambridge, mainly Cambridge… four
outside the strict remit of our research for applied last year and three got in (L1).
this paper, it provides useful context and For the state schools, the picture is more
furthermore brings out a different aspect of varied, dependent above all on the social
the contrast between the state and background of the pupils and, especially in
independent sectors.8 The independent Leicester, their ethnic heritage as well. L6 is
schools are very much geared to getting a large, socially and ethnically diverse,
virtually 100 per cent of their pupils into sixth-form college which draws students
(good) universities – after all, this is what
from the city of Leicester and beyond, and
sends around 85 per cent of its school-
8 On the changing patterns of ‘going away to uni’ see leavers into some form of HE.
Christie (2007); Holdsworth (2009); and for the US case
Mulder and Clark (2002).
13
Somewhere in the region of 70 per And as regards the Sussex state-school
cent of our students are of non-white- perspective, here is a typical quote from
British origin… Asian and Black African, one of the Brighton sixth-form colleges:
now more East European… [Some of] The majority [referring to the last few
these students come to us not having years] went to London and the South
been in the country very long… So the East… one or two going to Scottish
cultural mix is extreme and the social universities, not very many. Another
mix probably equally diverse… The year there was a move towards Leeds,
higher socio-economic groups are Sheffield, Liverpool and Manchester,
definitely students who have come to so it varies a bit from year to year…
us through the county schools… [However] I think there was a shift to
[Regarding universities] Midland more local universities after the
universities, and that is culturally
finance changed [referring to the
driven, it’s about Asian students not introduction of fees]… Ethnic
moving away from home. So Leicester, minorities want to stay in Brighton…
DMU [De Montfort University], but that would be only a few students
Coventry, Aston, Warwick and to some [since they are not numerous at the
extent the Nottingham universities… college]… (S8).
and Birmingham and maybe I should
add Loughborough as well… these are Having sustained the hypothesis that
the main attractors… I mean it’s nice orientation to studying abroad is stronger
that we are next to what was voted amongst pupils in the independent sector,
‘University of the Year’ [Leicester and having explored some aspects of the
University], so why would you want to contextual geography of applications to UK
move somewhere else if that is on your universities, it is clear that there are further
doorstep? It is the cultural expectation relationships between propensity to look
of these kids [referring to the Asian- abroad to study and other factors of an
heritage pupils] and it is particularly for academic, cultural and socio-economic
girls to stay at home… [The white nature. These are dealt with in subsequent
population] are far more diverse sections of the report; for now we round off
across the country and take the gap this discussion on state vs. independent
years… (L6). schools by returning to the all-important
numbers question.
The Sussex staff interviews generally
backed up the trends noted above, except To do this we combine the statistical
that the county’s geographical location (less findings from Tables 2 and 3, and re-
centrally placed within England than balance them by the proportionate national
Leicester) and its much smaller numbers of (English) data on 16-18 year-old pupil
minority ethnic origin students tended to enrolment in state and independent
dampen down the ‘local effect’ in the school/colleges. Table 2 showed that 7.2
pattern of applications. For the per cent of the standard sample and 4.0
independents, Oxbridge and the rest of the per cent of the narrow sample were
Russell Group once again reign supreme: applying abroad, but these figures were
based on a 50:50 sample split between
About 10 to 12 per cent of the year state and independent schools. Table 3
group would go to Oxbridge… And the separated the standard and narrow sample
rest would aim at the Russell findings on ‘study abroad’ into state and
universities… Warwick, Bristol, London independent sector. Table 4 provides a
– UCL, KCL and Imperial are popular, revised set of estimates for the proportions
York to some extent, Edinburgh is quite applying abroad (and also ‘thought about
popular, Bath, Loughborough, UEA, a it’), taking into account the ratio of state vs.
little bit of Leicester, Leeds… So, a fair independent pupils aged 16-18 and taking
spread (S3). one or more A-levels or A-level equivalents
in England in 2007-08. This ratio is 89.1
14
Table 4 Study abroad: revised estimates (all data %)
per cent in the state sector and 10.9 per referred to above, dividing the 16-18 years
cent in the independent schools.9 These cohort by two, and assuming that all pupils
percentages are used to weight the re- are potential university applicants (but of
calculation of the combined averages of the course a minority are not), we arrive at the
state and independent sector responses – following figures, based on the narrow
see the final column under ‘standard sample. For those actually applying abroad,
sample’ and under ‘narrow sample’ in Table the overall ballpark figure is 5000, made up
4. These ‘weighted averages’ represent our of slightly less than 1000 independent-
final estimate of the ‘real’ proportions of sector pupils and slightly more than 4000
English pupils who are applying to study state pupils. For those who merely thought
abroad (3.8 per cent for the standard about applying and did not do so, the
sample, 3.1 per cent for the narrow one), or estimates are around 17,700 overall,
who thought about applying and did not go comprising 15,000 state and 2700
ahead (11.0 and 10.7 per cent for the two independent sector pupils. The standard
samples respectively). sample results are somewhat higher, but
they are compromised by the distorting
The data in Table 4, particularly the final-
effect of the overseas pupils.
column weighted averages, are critical as
they enable us to make broad estimates of
the absolute numbers applying abroad Overseas pupils at UK schools and UK
(though not those who actually go, which is nationals domiciled abroad
unknown). Moreover such a calculation
demonstrates that many more apply from One of the surprising outcomes of the
the state sector than from independent survey research in schools was the scale of
schools. True, the independent sector has the presence of foreign students who had
an application rate to study abroad which is been sent to Britain by their foreign-resident
twice that of state schools (5.5 vs. 2.8 per parents to study for secondary-level
cent for the narrow sample, i.e. excluding qualifications, especially A-levels, in order to
overseas pupils); but the fact that the state gain entry to UK universities. As noted
sector contains eight times the number of earlier, this group also tends to have higher
16-18 year-olds means that the absolute rates of application to non-UK universities,
numbers are likely to be four times greater usually alongside UCAS applications; and
from the state sector. Using the DCSF data this group constitutes the ‘difference’
between the standard and narrow samples
of our questionnaire analysis.
9 These data refer to ‘16-18 year-old candidates entered
for level 3 qualifications at least equivalent in size to one A As non-UK nationals, these pupils do not fit
level’. The data do not filter out A-level pupils who do not within the strict remit of the research that
apply for university, who are likely to be more numerous at we were commissioned to undertake by
state-sector institutions. These pupil statistics are from
DCSF: GCE/VCE/Applied A/ AS and Equivalent Results in DIUS and then BIS. Indeed, in one sense
England, 2007/08 (Revised). Source: they are migrating in the opposite direction
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000827/ind to UK students who go abroad for their
ex.shtml (accessed 27 April 2009)
15
university education. But they are worth The following interview extracts, selected
saying a little bit about, for several reasons. from a much larger volume of insightful
First, they are a significant presence in A- information, give some pointers about the
level cohorts, especially in independent non-UK students and their application
boarding schools (although their presence strategies for university.
is not restricted to this type of school). We have a small boarding community
Second, their disproportionate presence of about 30 boys… The profile of the
amongst those who answered some form of boarders is primarily Far Eastern –
‘Yes’ to question 3.3 complicates the Chinese, Hong Kong Chinese, Korean.
statistical picture. And third, for the UK’s They have come into the country with
graduate labour market, their passage the aim to go to a British university. So
through the second- and third-level they are all looking to go to Oxford,
education system in Britain, especially if
Cambridge and the London colleges.
they stay on after graduating, acts as a There is an obsession with the LSE –
compensating flow for the ‘loss’ of UK- they have quite a narrow view of
nationals who opt to study abroad. So, one British universities… But we have had
country’s ‘brain drain’ is another’s ‘brain in the past… candidates from either
gain’; and in the case of the UK, brain drain Africa or the Middle East who have
and gain might be occurring come here to do A-Levels and then go
simultaneously. For the time being we do no to American universities. Last year our
more than signal this phenomenon as one only candidate that went abroad was a
worthy of further research, and make a few Middle Eastern candidate – he is from
summary points based on evidence from Dubai – who went to study Medicine in
the interview material. In fact, teachers and California (L3).
advisers had more information about these
overseas pupils and seemed more We have got an international
interested in talking about them than they community. We offer a British education
did about what they saw as the more and that is why the international
tenuous issue of local students applying to students come… on the last count we
study abroad. had students from 54 countries of the
world. Quite a number from Asia; a
Although many foreign nationalities are growing number from Europe,
present in Britain’s schools (school S1 particularly from Eastern Europe. They
claimed to have pupils from 54 different used to be from Russia exclusively, but
countries!), four groups stood out as the now they are also from the Ukraine and
main ones reported by the interviewees: places like Latvia… Let me think – when
Chinese, East Europeans (mainly Russians), I say Asia, there are quite a variety of
Germans and Nigerians. These pupils Asian girls from a variety of countries.
generally come from wealthy and privileged We get a couple from America and quite
backgrounds in their home countries, and a large number from Nigeria and other
are sent to often expensive independent places in Africa… a few German girls
schools in England in order to use these as because it ties in with their German
stepping-stones to the best universities, system… [For the overseas pupils] I am
above all Oxford and Cambridge, but also thinking American universities… actually
the LSE. But they may ‘hedge their bets’ by there is also Hong Kong. For some it is
also applying to the top Ivy League because they are from that part of the
universities in the US. And some will return world. Quite a lot of them would choose
to universities in their home countries, the American universities because of
especially where there are good universities the Liberal Arts approach… they see that
to fall back on.10 as attractive. A lot of them have the Ivy
League… or their parents have the Ivy
10 Such as the University of Hong Kong, the National Leagues in their heads, it is just a strong
University of Singapore, and the top German universities. appeal. Particularly for girls that
16
wouldn’t get in [to Oxbridge]… nearly all Summing up from the various quotes
of them would put in a British already given, the English-speaking
application at the same time. They do it countries loom large, above all the United
dual, and if they don’t get into Oxford States, Canada, Australia and Ireland.
and Cambridge, they want them to get Additionally, some of the foreign students
into Harvard. The Hong Kong Chinese will return to their home countries for their
are slightly different, because again they university education, either as a fall-back to
put in dual application and if they don’t not getting into world-class universities,
succeed over here, their fallback is to go such as the Hong Kong Chinese (see the
to Hong Kong (S1). quote immediately above), or as part of
their planned educational progression, such
Intriguingly, the overseas pupils studying in
as many of the Germans.
English schools have their mirror-image in
the form of UK-nationals studying at Question 3.3 on the main questionnaire
international schools abroad. Yet in some asked those who are applying to study
respects the behaviour of the latter group is abroad and those who thought about
quite different. Questionnaire data from a applying, to name their preferred country.
small-scale survey of UK-nationals at Table 5 sets out the answers for the two
international schools in Europe (107 pupils samples. The United States is the dominant
responded) reveals that 93 per cent were in destination accounting for half of the
the process of applying to study abroad (i.e. narrow-sample responses and four in ten of
outside the country where they are currently the standard sample. The main difference
studying); of these, two-thirds were applying between the standard and narrow samples,
to UK universities (not necessarily apart from the aggregate numbers
exclusively).11 Only 3 per cent of the responding (211 vs. 147), is the German
international-school sample had thought and East Asian (mainly Chinese) effect: the
about applying abroad but did not go narrow sample has far fewer respondents
ahead, and only 4 per cent had not for these countries. Filtering out the non-UK
contemplated foreign study. The general respondents reveals the dominant
picture from the international schools is Anglophone nature of the top destinations:
that the best students academically are in order of importance the US (51.0 per
those who are set on getting into UK cent), Australia/NZ (13.6 per cent), Ireland
universities, using other countries’ (11.6 per cent) and Canada (5.4 per cent).
universities as a back-up. Nevertheless, Note that Ireland attracts more than half of
despite this UK-orientation, international those opting for a European destination.
schools’ UK-national pupils do have a Our data indicate very little UK-domiciled
higher tendency than UK-resident pupils to student movement to continental European
apply to non-UK universities, so this countries such as France or Germany. This,
channel of higher education international in turn, suggests that secondary data,
mobility should not be ignored. which do report some continental European
destinations, are potentially flawed,
perhaps by conflating Erasmus-like credit
Countries targeted mobility in the statistics.
The interview extracts from the teachers
and advisers quoted earlier give a clear Academic performance
indication of the range of countries which
are targeted by pupils aspiring or thinking Here we investigate the hypothesis that
to move abroad for their higher education. those who might go abroad to study, or at
least consider the possibility, are the
academic high-flyers seeking ‘world-class’
11 This survey was administered by Allan Findlay and his universities – most of which are in the
colleagues at Dundee, who sent the questionnaire to a
small selection of European international schools where United States.
there were significant numbers of sons and daughters of
British ‘expats’ attending.
17
Table 5 Destinations for those who are applying, or considered
applying, abroad
Several questions on the questionnaire substantially lower than the survey total
allow us to explore this relationship. (1400), although the IB students also
contribute to the sample shortfall. It is also
First we look at actual or predicted
possible that respondents remembered
academic grades: A-levels and GCSEs are
their predicted grades incorrectly (fairly
the logical indicators.12 Table 6 gives these
unlikely) or that schools over-graded their
results; we deploy the standard sample
predictions (possible but probably unlikely
which gives more robust results. The narrow
on a large scale). We divided the A-level
sample results yield the same general
grades into three more-or-less equal
picture, but with lower frequency counts
classes – 3 As or better (i.e. including AAAA,
throughout. For A-levels we checked any
AAAB etc.), 3 or more B grades or better
grades already obtained, plus the predicted
(e.g. AAB, BBB), and outcomes below this.
grades (as reported by the students from
The figures show that high-flying students
the information on their UCAS forms or told
with (predicted) grades of at least 3 As are
to them by their tutors). There is obviously
more than twice as likely to apply for
an element of imprecision here: some
university abroad compared to those with
students did not know their predicted
lower (predicted) grades. However we also
grades: this helps to account for the fact
find a less marked tendency for the lowest-
that the sum-total of respondents (1219) is
performers to apply abroad more than the
academically middle-ranked; and this
12 We exclude the IB (international baccalaureate) from relationship is also present in the narrow
the analysis because of the small sample size (35 for the
standard sample, of whom 23 gave predicted points). sample. This may be a ‘hedging bets’
Whilst the sample was not sufficient to yield any robust strategy for those who fear they may not
indication of the relationship between going abroad and make it into a (good) UK university.
predicted performance, it is worth noting that just over
half the IB pupils (19 out of 35) are applying (8) or had
thought of applying (11) for universities abroad.
18
Table 6 Answers to the question 'Have you thought about applying to a
non-UK university?' by academic performance: standard sample
GCSEs (n = 1254)
7+ at A* and A 36 6.9 82 15.8 401 77.3 519
7+ at A or B 12 2.8 46 10.8 369 86.4 427
less 8 2.6 31 10.1 269 87.3 308
19
Table 7 Applying to university abroad by predicted A-level scores
Chi-square for standard sample 13.229; df 2; p < .001. For the narrow
sample 11.026; df 2; p < .01
Chi-square for standard sample 12.689; df 2; p < .002. For the narrow
sample 6.637; df 2; p < .05
the UK and a propensity to consider We had for example a guy from here…
applying to study abroad. The small actually he had dual nationality and he
difference between the percentages for got offers from Oxford and Yale and
Oxbridge and pre-1992 universities means somewhere else in America… and he
that the chi-square statistic for the top part chose Yale over the others. But I mean
of Table 9 is not significant. For those who that is a very unusual case not just
are actually applying, the Oxbridge and pre- because he was very talented but
1992 categories are close; the gap comes because we don’t have many
with the post-1992 type – 7.8 down to 3.2 applications [from British pupils] to
per cent. America. So, yes, we track them [the
applications abroad], but it isn’t
For those who considered applying, but did
difficult because there are so few and
not follow that through, the percentage
they tend to be outstanding…
scores are more evenly spaced across the
outstandingly good.
three categories. A clearer contrast is
evident for the Top-10 group of universities: A not dissimilar story surfaced in the pupil
those who had at least three of their UCAS interviews where the ‘Oxbridge types’ or
choices as top-10 ranked universities were those who had failed to get into Oxbridge
more likely to consider also the foreign first time round thought about the United
option. Table 10 verifies the significance, States:
following the model of Tables 7 and 8. Yes, we [classmates] talk about
The dual or linked hypotheses that studying overseas. Obviously while
propensity to apply, or consider applying, to we’ve been applying [for UCAS] we’ve
study abroad, are correlated with academic been talking about it quite a lot…
high-performers and with applicants to the especially now that we’re getting our
top UK universities are supported by offers. One of the guys in the year
interview evidence, both teachers and above us has just gone to an American
pupils. Here is an interview extract from the university. So the people that haven’t
Assistant Principal of S4, a Sussex [got their main offers] this year or
independent boarding school: those who are re-applying to
20
Table 9 Answers to the question 'Have you thought about applying to a non-UK
university?' by type of university applied for: standard sample
Notes: Post-1992 includes other institutes of HE which are not universities. Percentages
may not tally due to rounding
Chi-square for standard sample 31.049; df 1; p < .001. For the narrow sample 7.273; df 1; p
< .01.
21
Table 11 Answers to the question 'Have you thought about applying to a non-UK university?'
by parental education: standard and narrow samples
correlation between credit mobility and and percentages applying abroad. The chi-
parental education – in terms of whether square statistic is significant for the
the student’s mother and/or father had a standard sample (12.714; df 4; p<.05) but
degree (HEFCE 2004; also see Findlay et al. is not significant for the narrow version.
2006: 303-304). There is also a wider Moving now to socio-occupational class, we
literature on the intergenerational transfer refer to another question on the schedule,
of educational and cultural capital (cf. which gave 12 categories to tick one or two
Bourdieu 1986; Findlay et al. 2006; Reay et (i.e. for mother and father). Given the
al. 2005).
dispersion of responses across so many
On the questionnaire, a question asked if options, we collapsed the occupational
the respondent’s parents had university- classification to five: manager/director,
level education. Possible answers are professional, clerical/sales, manual, and
‘both’, ‘yes, my father, ‘yes, my mother’, and ‘other’. We made one further modification
‘neither’. Parents’ level of education split which reacted to the fact that an
the sample as follows: 40.6 per cent had unexpectedly large number of respondents
neither parents with education at university only checked one option (i.e. for one parent,
level; 32.7 per cent had both parents; and not two). Whether this was because these
26.7 per cent had one parent university- were pupils from single-parent families, or if
educated, made up of 18.3 per cent fathers there was some other reason for this, we do
only and 8.5 per cent the mother only.14 not know. Therefore, in order to standardise
the results, we took the ‘highest’ socio-
Table 11 shows a clear relationship,
occupational class indicated for each
especially for the more affirmative answer
respondent.
(‘Yes, and I am applying’); the trend is less
obvious for the other positive variant of Table 12 cross-tabulates socio-occupational
thinking about, but not applying abroad. class of respondents’ parents against the
When the two samples (standard and by-now three familiar answer options to
narrow) are compared, nothing much question 3.3. There is a clear gradation in
changes beyond a reduction in the numbers the percentage likelihood of responding
positively across the class hierarchy from
14 These figures are based on the standard sample for
manager/director through professional/
those who answered this question (n = 1356); teacher to clerical etc. and then to manual
percentages do not tally due to rounding. University worker. This gradation is repeated for the
education was more prevalent amongst Sussex parents:
37.1 per cent of Sussex respondents had both parents
first two answers; and then goes the other
university-educated, compared to 28.3 per cent for the way, as expected, for the third option, ‘No’.
Leicester sample, whereas the cases with neither parent
university-educated were 46.3 per cent for Leicester and
34.9 per cent for Sussex.
22
Table 12 Answers to the questions 'Have you ever thought about applying to a non-UK
university?' by socio-occupational class of parents: standard sample
Chi-square for standard sample 8.132; df 2; p < .05. For the narrow sample not significant.
students who engage in international study private schools which have significant
for credit. shares of the Asian-heritage pupils who
come from the wealthier segments of the
Unlike the female-dominated Erasmus
Asian population: many elements of these
flows with their strong association with
groups are business people and
foreign-language degrees, our
professionals who came to Leicester from
questionnaire data exhibit only moderate
East Africa, especially Uganda. However,
sex-selectivity. Table 14 shows that there is
the Asian pupils, and other minority-ethnic
a greater tendency for females to apply,
pupils, are more heavily concentrated in the
and consider applying abroad; however, this
city’s state schools, especially those which
difference is at the margins of statistical
are close to, or draw on, inner-city
significance (based on chi-square values
residential areas. Out in the county, the
applied to dichotomised ‘applying’ and ‘not
ethnic mix of the general population is
applying’ columns). At least as far as the
different and predominantly white, and this
standard sample is concerned – where p =
is reflected within the schools. However, the
.057 – the male:female ratio is slightly
picture even here is not clear-cut.
more marked for those actually applying to
Independent schools within easy reach of
go abroad; for the narrow sample this
Leicester recruit heavily from the city – both
gender difference is rather less evident.15
Asian pupils and, especially, white pupils.
The situation with ethnicity is much more This suggests a form of ‘white flight’ to
complex. Whereas sex is a dichotomous these independent schools which
variable, ethnicity is not (except in an particularly reflects the shortage of this type
artificial and simplistic division into ‘white’ of school in Leicester itself. County
and ‘non-white’). Leicester is a particularly boarding schools – which are more in the
emblematic place to examine for ethnicity- mould of traditional public schools – are
related research because of the city’s now- overwhelmingly white; their minority ethnic
exactly-equal division between its white pupils are more likely to be overseas
population and the ‘non-white’ population, students than drawn from locally-resident
which is predominantly Indian. But there is non-white minority-ethnic populations.
a rather specific geography to this division,
Brighton and Sussex, by contrast, are
which reflects itself in a particular way in
predominantly ‘white’ areas of the country,
enrolment. The city itself is very ‘Asian’ and
especially the county areas. The city of
therefore all secondary schools in the city
Brighton and Hove has small minority
and its suburbs have large shares of Asian-
heritage pupils. This applies also to the ethnic communities originating from the
traditional postwar countries of immigration
15 Our interpretation of this difference is that foreign-
in South Asia and the Caribbean, and
national pupils sent to study in Britain are more likely to refugee groups from the Horn of Africa,
be males than females – partly, perhaps, because boys’ notably Sudan. Parts of Brighton have
education is prioritised over girls’ in some cultures, and/or
because of the perceived need to ‘protect’ girls by not
substantial estates of social housing (or
sending them away. former social housing now in private
24
ownership), mainly inhabited by working- including White-UK/Irish (42 per cent),
class white people. Otherwise the city and White European (37 per cent), Chinese (25
its adjacent rural areas and small towns per cent), and Black-African (42 per cent).
(Lewes, Haywards Heath, Horsham etc.) Third, even from the raw figures we can
have a predominantly middle-class observe that there are certain groups which
population, with managers, directors, are more abroad-oriented than others,
professionals and teachers over- notably the categories ‘White European’
represented vis-à-vis the country as a and ‘Chinese’. Table 16 selects out of the
whole. main ethnic groups and presents the
relevant data in percentage form to bring
Having set out in some detail the necessary
out this comparison more clearly.
background context, let us turn to the
questionnaire data. Table 15 presents the The results show that both the White-
full ‘raw’ data for ‘apply abroad’ and UK/Irish and South Asian groups have very
‘thought about applying but did not’ cross- low propensities to apply to study at a
tabulated with ethnic origin, for the foreign university (3.6 and 4.0 per cent
standard sample. Several things to note respectively), whereas the White European
here. First is the numerical dominance of and Chinese rates are, at 30.0 and 41.7
two groups of respondents: ‘White-UK/Irish’ per cent, around ten times higher. When we
and ‘Indian’. At 840 and 234 respectively look at the second option on Table 16,
they make up 80 per cent of the sample three ethnicities, the two ‘White’ groups
who answered the ‘ethnic’ question and Chinese, all post similar rates of 12-15
(n=1347). Second, we note from the ‘total’ per cent, whereas the South Asians are
column of the table that the ethnic groups much lower at 5.6 per cent. The two groups
are unequally distributed between the two which are by far the most oriented to the
regions: to facilitate this comparison, the possibility of moving to university abroad –
Leicester data (as the most ‘ethnic’) are put the White European and Chinese – are,
in brackets. Leicester accounts for 227 out however, precisely the two groups which are
of 234 of the ethnic Indian respondents, or more likely to be ‘non-British’. This is clearly
94 per cent, and 13 of the 16 Pakistani and revealed when we check the ‘narrow
Bangladeshi ethnic-origin respondents. On sample’ figures (those in brackets in Table
the other hand, Leicester accounts for 16), which show that the vast majority of
below-par proportions of most other groups, these respondents are not long-term British
25
residents. For the South Asian groups there is what they are aspiring towards… and
is an interesting gender dimension – the their daughters seem to aspire
majority of who are applying or thought of towards Medicine, Pharmacy and Law,
applying to study abroad are male. We those are the main areas they are
enlarge on this, and other ethno-cultural interested in (L1).
aspects in the interview material. The ethnic mix of the school would
Most of the interviewees in the Leicester be… I think it is 1 in 4 of our boys are
schools highlighted the issue of the Asian from the… they are English but they
pupils when asked to describe their pupil are first or second [sic: he means
populations; the only two schools where second and third] generations… their
this element did not feature were L4 and families are originally from the Asian
L5, the two ‘county’ boarding schools in this subcontinent […] One observation I
region’s sample: would think about our Asian students
is… I have to be careful not to over-
I would say it’s overwhelmingly kind
generalise… but a lot of them don’t
of… white middle class (L4).
want to venture that far from home. So
If you saw our school assembly, we are a lot of the Leicester University
predominantly a white school… very applicants would be from the Asian
middle England (L5) community, so they would stay in the
More typical of the Leicester situation are parental home… (L3).
the following quotes which also allude to The two Leicester state sixth-form colleges
Asian family practices of preferring surveyed had more ‘local fields’ as far as
(making?) their children, especially the general target-universities were
daughters, to live at home when they go to concerned: this was noted earlier as being
university, and certainly not to go and study closely related to the ‘ethnic’ or ‘cultural’
in a foreign university. First, two quotes factor. Regarding the low proclivity of Asian
from independent schools which draw students to think about studying abroad, L6
predominantly from the Leicester city put it as follows:
catchment area.
[Their potential interest in going
We are an all-girls school and we have abroad] is limited and it is not
got a high percentage from the Asian something that the college has ever
population, Asian background… pupils taken a huge amount of interest in –
whose parents are successful doctors that may be because we are
and lawyers, professionals in the city of surrounded by some high-performing
Leicester. They see the English higher universities. And it is also about the
education as the way forward and that needs of the students – if they are not
Table 16 Study abroad by main group of ethnic origin: standard sample (narrow
sample in brackets)
Note: 'all ethnicities' figures differ slightly from the data in Table 2 because of different
totals (Table 2, n = 1400; Table 13, n = 1347 because 53 respondents did not
answer the 'ethnic question'). Percentages do not tally due to rounding. 26
going to choose Bristol [because it is wider structural issues of financial
too far away] they are not going to constraints and social class are also
study in Brussels (L6). relevant. We should also avoid stereotyping
Asian students as inherently immobile.
Finally, it is worth listening in to part of the
Furthermore, we should remember that
long interview with IL1 which gives an Inner-
Asian and other migrant-origin pupils are
London perspective which certainly
often part of transnational families with
replicates some of the Leicester issues of
extensive mobility histories – for instance,
university application patterns from ethnic-
the Ugandan Asians who are numerous in
minority pupils (especially Asian-heritage),
Leicester. Family links within and beyond
but also raises other important factors,
the UK may also facilitate secondary and
such as finance and the emotional
university education, via a pattern of staying
concerns of single-parent families.
with relatives.
We are a London sixth-form college
that has 1400 students… and a
number of them will go to university… Disciplinary orientation and languages
75 per cent of them [who go to Earlier research into Erasmus-type mobility
university] will stay in London… There demonstrated the strong connection to
is a diverse ethnic mix… about two- foreign-language degrees, especially as
thirds are from ethnic minority groups, regards credit mobility to Europe – typically
from a whole range of backgrounds […] to countries like France, Germany, Spain
We have a lot of students who aren’t and Italy (HEFCE 2004; Findlay et al. 2006).
very mobile, often due to their What is the role of foreign languages in
background finances which come into degree mobility?
that – there is no doubt about that […]
I think there are emotional implications We tried to answer this question by looking
as well… I am increasingly thinking that at the A-levels being taken. Looking at the
when I think about our students […] I A-level combinations, we classed them into
had a student in here earlier today five main sets: science student, no
who’s got an interview at Cambridge language (n=382); science student, with
coming up soon. She’s from a white language (n=47); arts student, no language
working-class family and her mother – (n=622); arts student, with language
she just lives with her mother, single- (n=99); other, i.e. mixed arts/science, no
parent family – I had her mother sat language (n=170). The enumeration is for
here saying ‘Look, she’s not going to the 1332 students who gave codable
university; I went to work at the age of answers to the relevant question.16
fourteen’. I mean, it’s a fantastic Table 17 gives the picture for the standard
chance to actually say this is possible sample, with the narrow sample in
[for the student] and she [the mother] brackets. The table shows a higher
is actually going to go with her to the proportion of science students applying to
interview, which is great. But what I’m study abroad, especially the science-
saying is that a lot of students – it’s a language combination. However, these
lot of girls actually – a lot of students science students are disproportionately
don’t want to leave their mother overseas pupils (compare the figures in
behind. I think it is often when they’ve brackets for the narrow sample).
only got their mothers and the father is
not on the scene, and they can’t… they
mustn’t do it [go away to university],
you know (IL1). 16 This subject classification was based on the
predominant balance of the A-levels being taken. For
This lengthy and insightful quote also instance someone taking Maths, Physics and Economics
cautions us against laying too much would be classed as Science; but Maths, History and
Economics as Arts. Some rather arbitrary allocations had
emphasis on ‘culture’ and ‘ethnicity’ when, to be made, e.g. Geography as Arts, Psychology as
especially in the current economic climate, Science.
27
Table 17 Answers to the question 'Have you thought about applying to a non-UK university? By
A-level combination and language: standard sample (narrow sample in brackets)
Overall, the situation portrayed is one of few Year Abroad… because I talked to
students taking one or more languages at them about the process and UCAS and
A-level: only 146 out of 1320 or one in nine. advising and so on, and they are abuzz
Two-thirds of these are Arts students. These with it (L3).
small numbers limit the statistical analysis: There aren’t that many applications
all we can say with confidence is that, for [for university] in Modern Languages. I
Arts students, doing a language (or two) at mean they do fall through the school
A-level approximately doubles the chances right from Year 9 onwards… [We have]
of considering studying abroad. For Science French, German, Spanish and Italian –
students the problem of small numbers so you know in that sense it’s a healthy
makes comparison even more difficult. state. But we don’t have that many
The background to this is the well-known applications. What we do have is
long-term decline in the uptake of people applying for a dual course
languages at A-level (and GCSE) in English somewhere… often the degrees have a
and UK schools. This drop-off is especially Year Abroad (S4).
the case for the ‘traditional’ European Languages, I am afraid to say, are no
foreign languages, French and German; longer part of our programme here.
Spanish and Italian are holding up better.17 Having said that, many of our students
The downturn in languages was noted in speak two or three languages fluently…
several of the staff interviews. For example:
and English is not always their
We are part of a national trend, I think, strongest language… It is, I suppose,
that languages are being studied less. the best word to use is ironic; there is
However, we have some very high- a linguistic richness in the college…
achieving boys, and some of our best But in terms of Modern Foreign
students go off to do languages. A big Languages… there is a little bit of
factor of that is the excitement of the Spanish going on here, connected with
Tourism and Travel at advanced level.
17 On the other hand, the increasing ethnic and national
But we don’t have French on the
diversity of the UK’s school population does bring in pupils curriculum any more… We have an
with varying knowledge of many other languages. Amongst arrangement with a couple of students
those mentioned were, in Leicester state schools, Dutch
(from Somali refugee families onward-migrating from the
who want to study French and they do
Netherlands to the UK), Arabic and a variety of Asian it at [names another Leicester sixth-
languages (above all Gujerati); and in Leicester and form college] for example (L7).
Sussex independent schools, Chinese and Russian. From
the interview and questionnaire evidence, however, none The second contextual element is that
of these languages has much relevance to university foreign language study at degree level is
destination choice.
28
generally combined with credit mobility – a side and therefore the highly variable
year or semester abroad at a foreign influence of the difference between the two
university or some other form of ‘foreign (which represents the ‘overseas’ pupils) can
experience’ such as a work placement. This be seen at a glance. Third, we feel that the
is commented on by L3 and S3 immediately most important answer to focus on is the
above and also earlier interview quotes. A first (‘I am applying to a non-UK university’),
prospective Erasmus student summed it up for two reasons – it represents a greater
like this: commitment to the idea of studying abroad
than merely thinking about the possibility,
Actually, because I am doing Politics,
and secondly, on most of the factors
Philosophy and Economics, you can
analysed it gives a clearer statistical
also take German on the side. That is
contrast or gradation in the percentage
what I am planning on doing. And then
columns.
you can organise… I don’t know what
it’s called, it begins with an E… type of The first indicator, language, picks up one
scheme (Sp6). of the themes of the previous subsection.
The results in the first column-set show that
pupils who speak foreign languages are
Personal, family and school links abroad more likely to consider applying to study
The final set of hypothesised factors for abroad than those who speak none.
pupils who are applying or consider However, the evidence is based on quite
applying abroad are what might be small numbers, and the relationship does
generically called network and information not hold when we switch to the second
factors – personal, family or schools links, column-set, on those who considered, but
including prior mobility history. These cover did not apply, to go abroad.
a wide range of variables deriving from Next, Table 18 looks at whether parents
questionnaire responses as well as more have ever lived abroad for more than six
impressionistic and anecdotal evidence months. Here again there is a positive
highlighted in the staff and pupil interviews. relationship only for the first column. Very
We take the relevant questionnaire data probably, we are mixing here two types of
first. situation: ‘white’ pupils whose business and
Table 18 displays six indicators pertaining professional-class parents may have lived
to these themes. We put all the variables and worked abroad as expats; and pupils of
into one table, and we set the standard immigrant heritage whose parents may well
sample alongside the narrow sample (in have lived abroad before coming to Britain
brackets). We do this because the trends as migrants or refugees. As we have seen,
are fairly consistent, if not always the latter group has a tendency to ‘keep’
statistically very robust, and in order to their sons and daughters at home when
avoid too much detailed and repetitive they go to university.18
description of results. Third, we look at family holiday patterns.
Three further points about the Pupils who are widely travelled (visiting
interpretation of Table 18 should be made. seven or more different countries on
First, the percentages – which are the key holiday or other family trips) are almost
measure since they record relative twice as likely to consider studying abroad,
propensity to apply, or consider applying, to and to apply, compared to those who have
university abroad – are based on the visited no, or only one, foreign country.
standard sample. Previous tables have The overall message of Table 18 is that
consistently shown that this sample gives most of the ‘network’ factors are important,
statistically more significant results.
Second, the comparison of the standard
and narrow sample frequencies is easy 18However this generalisation needs a caveat, especially
since the two sets of figures are side-by- amongst more wealthy, cosmopolitan and ‘westernised’
migrant-origin families.
29
Table 18 Study abroad by various personal, family and information factors: standard
sample (narrow sample in brackets)
but three other interpretive remarks are in logically lead to study in, say, North
order. First, the picture is somewhat America, Australia or France. Second, the
muddied by pupils of immigrant differences in frequencies between the
background, for whom foreign languages standard and the narrow samples should
proficiency and prior residence and travel be kept in mind. In most cases, these
abroad may have more to do with family differences attenuate the relationships
migration history than with the kind of more observed. This attenuation is generally
cosmopolitan experience that might more evident in the first column, on actual
30
applications abroad, than it is in the second that time taken three groups of
option, on merely considering the possibility students… to give them an experience
of studying abroad (where, for the first two of education in a different
factors in Table 18, there is no relationship environment. But it is becoming
anyway). Nevertheless, on all first-column increasingly difficult to stump up the
relationships, the ordering of the money… [At the beginning] we did it
percentages remains unchanged for the with the ‘Excellence in Cities’ money,
narrow sample. The final observation is that which helped us to provide a grant if
many of the factors measured in Table 18 someone wanted to attend the
are expressions of socio-structural programme. That is no longer existing
processes already commented on earlier, and we are asking for £400-500 which
notably the occupational (and therefore is just beyond what the majority can
wealth) background of the parents, and the afford (L7).
type of school. To cite one example, school No… certainly not… no formal trips
exchange trips, history/culture tours or abroad at all… The only contact in this
sports trips are far more frequent in the college abroad would be the fieldtrips
independent sector schools, where parents in Geography where they go to
are more likely to be able to afford such Morocco… (IL1).
educational ‘add-ons’.
Regarding information, most schools
On this last point, consider the following appeared not to do much pro-actively to
four quotes from interviews: the first two market overseas universities and
are effusive accounts of a range of trips destinations. In most cases it was a matter
offered by two independent schools, the of receiving books and promotional leaflets,
last two recount the more modest placing them in the library or on display in
endeavours of two state schools operating the careers office, and letting the students
in inner-city environments: do the rest. Three typical quotes:
…the school runs countless trips, Some information we get from some
countless sports tours. Every single very sexy destinations. I get
holiday will involve some overseas information from very expensive
trip… The trip I am always involved in medical schools in the Bahamas… very
every year is the debating trip to plush brochures which are functionally
Germany, because a former colleague
useless because they [the course fees]
is now teaching at a German-British are so expensive… St. George’s always
School in Berlin. So we take the writes to me, but none of the boys
debating team, myself and the Head of could afford to go there… though their
English… And they are always hugely
entry requirements are substantially
impressed with Berlin and walk around lower (L3).
and enjoy Humboldt University and so
on... and how wonderful Berlin is. But I get sent a completely random
none of them speak German to a collection of stuff from American
sufficient level that they would think of Universities. We get stuff from Lehigh…
studying there (L2). Washington… I don’t know why, it just
appears, it must have cost them a
If I look back to the summer, we had a fortune. Also some medical schools…
group that went out to Nepal… a St. George’s in the West Indies… To be
mixture of hiking and community honest, I don’t think anyone looks at
service. Our sports people toured. Our it… And I don’t know if we have sent
musicians went to South America… any people to these places in
(L5).
particular, certainly not in my time (L4).
There is one [exchange] link that… We do get students that come in and
[was]… set up in 2001, a school near ask about studying in America and
Petersburg in Virginia. We have since Australia. And of course there is
31
Erasmus and we tell them about that… parents. Parents are often abroad. For
so we do highlight that to them. But we instance I have just been dealing with
don’t chase people up at all; they a student who had to return to Toronto
would have to come and talk to us because his mother is seriously ill
about it (S9). there. He has been actually staying
with his aunt and uncle in Leicester…
These rather off-hand remarks by three
[but] his family origins are in the
staff tend to support our earlier
subcontinent of India and in Uganda
interpretation that teachers and advisers
(L7).
are not well-informed about HE options or
highly motivated to get their pupils to I can think of several Afro-Caribbean
consider applying. students who have relatives in
America… and often they would say
One of the key elements in stimulating
that they could go and live with their
interest in going abroad to university seems
aunt and uncle in Chicago or New York
to be personal and family links. In the words
(IL1).
of one staff interviewee:
I can’t think of anyone who has
considered that option [of applying Key findings and conclusions
abroad to study] who hasn’t had that
sort of reason in their family (L2). This paper has presented a fairly detailed
analysis of the material collected from a
And from a student interviewee, over the school-leavers’ survey of attitudes towards
telephone: studying at university abroad. It is based on
I am not sure yet [about applying questionnaire data from 1400 pupils in
abroad] because I was thinking about Sussex and Leicestershire; interviews with
a gap year. In my gap year, I might do 15 teaching and advisory staff in the
that… I am interested in America, I institutions surveyed; and a small input of
have family there – uncles and aunts, the ‘student voice’ from the 20 telephone
my godfather is there and a bunch of interviews. The key findings and
cousins… Miami, Florida and Florida conclusions are highlighted as follows: we
State [those are the universities I sequence them in response to the seven
might apply to], that is where they research questions posed in the early part
[family] are, so I can acclimatise (Lp6). of the paper.
Inevitably each story is individual, and so it 1. Based on a sample of 700 state-school
is hard to generalise, but the kind of stories pupils and 700 independent-school
brought to our attention in the staff pupils, 7.2 per cent of respondents
interviews were cases where the pupil’s were in the process of applying to study
parents had separated and one had gone to abroad, mostly alongside UCAS
live in another country (the USA, Canada, applications for UK university
Australia, etc.), second-generation Irish admission; and a further 13.0 per cent
pupils drawn by family links to Ireland and had thought about the ‘foreign option’
especially to Trinity College Dublin, and (to what depth, we cannot say), but not
migrant-origin pupils with relatives in other gone ahead. Taken together, these
migrant destination countries – typically, figures suggest at first glance that one
again, North America. These transnational in five Year 13 pupils intending to
family linkages were alluded to earlier and proceed to higher education consider
are exemplified in the following two quotes the possibility of applying abroad,
which hint at alternative study-abroad although only one in fourteen actually
channels: make an application. If these seem
unexpectedly high figures, then we
We have a number of students – I need to make it clear that they are
couldn’t put a number on it – who live weighted upwards by two distorting
with their relations and not with their
32
factors. One is that independent applying abroad. This in turn is related
schools have much higher rates of to other factors such as parental
application abroad (11.6 per cent as occupation and education, level of
against 2.9 per cent for state pupils), information and support available
and we know that pupils at within the school, frequency and range
independent schools are only a small of school trips, all of which are
minority (around 11 per cent) of total analysed separately in the paper but
sixth-form pupils in England and the which in reality are likely to be strongly
UK. Second, our standard sample interrelated.
included a proportion of pupils who 4. There is a clear relationship between
were not UK-nationals but overseas propensity to consider studying abroad
students sent to English schools as a and academic performance, as
stepping-stone to UK (and foreign)
measured by (predicted) A-level scores
universities. Taking these students out and (achieved) GCSE grades. A similar
of the questionnaire results, creating correlation exists with applicants who
thereby a ‘narrow sample’ of apply to the (perceived) ‘best’ UK
predominantly UK-domiciled UK- universities – Oxbridge, the Russell
nationals, lowers the percentage Group, etc.
considerably: overall, 4.0 per cent apply
to study abroad (2.8 per cent for the 5. Regarding demographic correlates,
state sector, 5.5 per cent for the females have a greater tendency than
independent sector), and 12.4 per cent males to consider studying abroad,
think about applying abroad, but do not although the contrast is barely
in fact do so (10.2 state, 14.9 statistically significant. Ethnicity works
independent). Bearing in mind that in more complex ways. Pupils who are
around 89 per cent of Year 13 pupils in the offspring of ‘traditional’ immigrant
England are in state schools and only minorities in the UK (South Asian, Afro-
11 per cent in independent schools, Caribbean etc.) have low propensities
the final ratios become 3.1 per cent of towards the idea of studying abroad;
HE applicants are applying to study however Chinese and ‘White
abroad, and 10.7 per cent consider the Europeans’ have higher-than-average
possibility but do not act on it. This rates, although these are partly
translates into approximately 5000 explained by their presence in the
Year 13 pupils in England applying to schools with boarders.
study abroad, plus a further 15,700 6. There is a relationship between
who consider the option but do not orientation to study abroad and
make an application. parental social class, measured here
2. Foreign study is mainly targeted at on the basis of broad occupational
North American universities, often but categories. This is highly likely to be
not always the premier institutions, causally linked with the previous factor,
seen as alternatives to the top given that socio-economic class is
universities in the UK. After the United known to be a key determinant of
States, Australia and Ireland are the academic attainment.
next most frequently applied for, but a 7. In the last analysis, personal and family
long way behind. All are Anglophone links are often decisive at the individual
countries. Science-oriented pupils have level; the most typical and robust
somewhat higher rates of applying indicators here are history of
abroad, and language has some personal/family travel abroad, friends
influence. and family members who have studied
3. As noted under 1, above, the or are studying abroad, and school trips
independent sector has a much higher and exchanges.
tendency for its pupils to consider
33
To conclude, we affirm that this paper low socio-economic status. Such patterns in
represents the first study on English school- our survey data link to academic
leavers’ attitudes and plans of studying at performance and network factors which
university abroad. It is of relevance to directly shape decisions and thoughts
government debates on internationalising about studying abroad. In sum, the socially
the student experience through increased and economically more powerful groups –
mobility, as evidenced for example in the the business-owners, professional and
UK’s participation in the Bologna Process of managerial classes, those with inherited
creating a ‘European Higher Education wealth – see international mobility as a way
Area’ and the Prime Minister’s Initiatives of of strategising to enhance the educational
Tony Blair (PMI 1 1992; PMI 2 2006) which capital of their offspring beyond the
also favour enhanced international student national to the global. Whilst this may
mobility (Gürüz 2008: 192-195). At a ultimately help to produce a globally
different level, this paper contributes to the competitive cadre of UK-origin
still small geographical and social-science internationally-educated graduates, it
literature on student migration. We highlight clearly works against any socially inclusive
the essential character of student mobility HE agenda of widening participation in
as spatial, life-style and educational international mobility for students.
processes which have local, regional,
national and international expressions.
Here, our focus has been on (potential) Acknowledgements
international moves, but we have seen how
This paper derives from research
they are embedded in a choice matrix of
commissioned by the Department for
other university destinations open to
Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS),
school-leavers.
subsequently the Department for Business,
While economic, cultural and technological Innovation and Skills (BIS). The title of the
globalisation sets the general context for project, which ran during 2008-2009, was
the internationalisation of HE and thus ISM ‘Motivations and Experiences of UK
(de Wit 2008; Gürüz 2008; Varghese Students to Study Abroad’. Allan Findlay
2008), it also seems to have the effect of (University of Dundee) was the lead
sharpening the perceived differences in investigator. This paper gives the full results
prestige between national HE systems, and of the main Sussex component of the
individual universities within them. research, the ‘Schools Survey’. Thanks to all
Increased information about universities those schools, teachers and pupils who
and the reputations of the research took part.
activities and teaching programmes,
nowadays codified in national and
international ranking lists which are widely
available, creates a global hierarchy of
universities in which few are in doubt as to References
which are at the top (Hazelkorn 2009).
Ackers, L. and Gill, B. (2008) Moving People
But there are other inequalities which in a and Knowledge: Scientific Mobility in an
sense are more disturbing. Our school- Enlarging European Union. Cheltemham:
leavers’ survey data leave little doubt about Edward Elgar.
the selective nature of international
mobility. We observe, in the tables and the Blanden, J. and Machin, S. (2008) Recent
associated discussion, a series of Changes in Intergenerational Mobility in the
overlapping dimensions of privilege UK. London: Sutton Trust.
interacting with and reinforcing each other:
state vs. independent schools, North vs. Bourdieu, P. (1986) The forms of capital, in
South, university-educated parents vs. Richardson, J.G. (ed.) Handbook of Theory
parents with no higher education, high vs. and Research for the Sociology of
34
Education. New York: Greenwood Press, students studying and working abroad,
241-256. European Urban and Regional Studies,
13(4): 291-318.
Bracht, O., Engel, C., Janson, K., Over, A.,
Schomberg, H. and Teichler, U. (2006) The Findlay, A.M. and King, R. (2010)
Professional Value of Erasmus Mobility: Motivations and Experiences of UK
Final Report. Kassel: International Centre Students Studying Abroad. London: BIS
for Higher Education Research. Research Paper, No. 8.
Brooks, R. and Waters, J. (2009) Findlay, A.M., Stam, A., King, R. and Ruiz-
International higher education and the Gelices, E. (2005) International
mobility of UK students, Journal of opportunities: searching for the meaning of
Research in International Education, 8(2): student migration, Geographical Helvetica,
191-209. 60(3): 192-200.
Byram, M. and Dervin, F. (eds) (2008) Gill, J. (2009) Fine-tuned data show UK
Students, Staff and Academic Mobility in challenging US as the top overseas draw,
Higher Education. Newcastle: Cambridge Times Higher Education, 21 May: 6-7.
Scholars Publishing.
Gürüz, K. (2008) Higher Education and
Castles, S. and Miller, M.J. (2009) The Age International Student Mobility in the Global
of Migration: International Population Knowledge Economy. Albany: State
Movements in the Modern World. University of New York Press.
Basingstoke: Macmillan (4th edition).
Hawthorne, L. (2008) The Growing Global
Christie, H. (2007) Higher education and Demand for Students as Skilled Migrants.
spatial (im)mobility: non-traditional Washington: Migration Policy Institute.
students and living at home, Environment
and Planning A, 39(10): 2445-2463. Hazelkorn, E. (2009) Higher education
rankings and the global ‘battle for talent’, in
de Wit, H. (2008) The internationalization of Bhandari, R. and Laughlin, S. (eds) Higher
higher education in a global context, in de Education on the Move: New Developments
Wit, H., Agarwal, P., Said, M.E., Sehoole, in Global Mobility. New York: IIE, 79-93.
M.T. and Sirozi, M. (eds) The Dynamics of
International Student Circulation in a Global HEFCE (2004) International Student
Context. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 1- Mobility: Final Report. London: HEFCE
14. Issues Paper 30.
de Wit, H., Agarwal, P., Said, M.E., Sehoole, HEFCE (2009) Attainment in Higher
M.T. and Sirozi, M. (eds) (2008) The Education: Erasmus and Placement
Dynamics of International Student Students. London: HEFCE Issues Paper 44.
Circulation in a Global Context. Rotterdam: King, R., with Black, R., Collyer, M., Fielding,
Sense Publishers. A. and Skeldon, R. (2010) People on the
Move: An Atlas of Migration. Berkeley:
Findlay, A.M., Geddes, A. and Smith, F. University of California Press.
(2010) Motivations and Experiences of UK
Students Studying Abroad, Statistical King, R. and Ruiz-Gelices, E. (2003)
Sources - Summary Metadata Report, International student migration and the
London: BIS Research Paper, No. 8A. European ‘Year Abroad’: the effects on
European identity and subsequent
Findlay, A.M., King, R., Stam, A. and Ruiz- migration behaviour, International Journal
Gelices, E. (2006) Ever reluctant of Population Geography, 9(2): 229-252.
Europeans: the changing geographies of UK
35
Krzaklewska, E. and Krupnik, S. (2006) The British Journal of Sociology of Education,
Experience of Studying Abroad for 31(2): 217-228.
Exchange Students in Europe. Research
Report, Erasmus Student Network Survey
2005.