MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: MICHELLE M. SEGUNDO Name of Rater: RODELYN E. HERNANDEZ

Position: TEACHER II Position: SCHOOL HEAD TEACHER III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: RAMADA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Results
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating

sheet/s or inter-observer agreement form/s done Quality
through onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom
1. Applied observation.
Basic knowledge of If onsite / face-to-face / in-person classes are not
Education content within and 7% implemented,
Services across curriculum • through observation of synchronous /
teaching areas. asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or
• through observation of a demonstration teaching* Efficiency
via LAC session.

1. Content
Knowledge
and Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating
Pedagogy sheet/s or inter-observer agreement form/s done
through onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom Quality
2. Used a range of
observation.
teaching strategies
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person classes are not
that enhance
Basic implemented,
learner
Education 7% • through observation of synchronous /
achievement in
Services asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or
literacy and
• through observation of a demonstration teaching*
numeracy skills.
via LAC session
(PPST 1.4.2)
Efficiency
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating
sheet/s or inter-observer agreement form/s done
3. Applied a range
through onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom Quality
of teaching
observation.
1. Content strategies to
Basic
Knowledge develop critical and
Education 7% If onsite / face-to-face / in-person classes are not
and creative thinking, as
Services implemented,
Pedagogy well as other higher-
• through observation of synchronous /
order thinking skills. Efficiency
asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or
(PPST 1.5.2)
• through observation of a demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
4. Managed
classroom structure Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating
to engage learners, sheet/s or inter-observer agreement form/s done
individually or in through onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom Quality
groups, in observation.
meaningful
exploration, 7% If onsite / face-to-face / in-person classes are not
discovery and implemented,
hands-on activities • through observation of synchronous /
within a range of asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or Efficiency
Basic 2. Learning physical learning • through observation of a demonstration teaching*
Education Environment environments. via LAC session.
Services and Diversity (PPST 2.3.2)
of Learners Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating
5. Managed learner sheet/s or inter-observer agreement form/s done
behavior through onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom Quality
constructively by observation.
applying positive
and non-violent 7% If onsite / face-to-face / in-person classes are not
discipline to ensure implemented,
learning-focused • through observation of synchronous / Efficiency
environments. asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or
(PPST 2.6.2). • through observation of a demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating
6. Used
sheet/s or inter-observer agreement form/s done
differentiated,
through onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom Quality
developmentally
observation.
appropriate learning
Basic
experiences to
Education 7% If onsite / face-to-face / in-person classes are not
address learners’
Services implemented,
gender, needs,
• through observation of synchronous /
strengths, interests Efficiency
asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or
and experiences.
• through observation of a demonstration teaching*
(PPST 3.1.2)
via LAC session.
7. Planned,
Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating
managed and
sheet/s or inter-observer agreement form/s done
implemented Quality
through onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom
developmentally
observation.
sequenced teaching
and learning
7% If onsite / face-to-face / in-person classes are not
processes to meet
implemented,
curriculum
• through observation of synchronous /
requirements and
asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or Efficiency
varied teaching
• through observation of a demonstration teaching*
contexts.
via LAC session.
(PPST 4.1.2).
Basic
3. Curriculum
Education
and Planning 1. Proof/s of attendance in LAC sessions / FGDs /
Services
meetings / other collegial discussions
2. Minutes of LAC sessions / FGDs / meetings /
Quality
8. Participated in other collegial discussions on use of teacher and
collegial learner feedback to enrich teaching practice
discussions that use 3. Reflection notes of teachers on their
teacher and learner 7% demonstration of teaching practices following
feedback to enrich participation from LAC sessions / FGDs / meetings /
teaching practice. other collegial discussions that use teacher and
(PPST 4.4.2) learner feedback to enrich teaching practice, with
Timeliness
proof/s of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS form/document that
highlights the objective
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating
9. Selected,
sheet/s or inter-observer agreement form/s done
developed,
through onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom Quality
organized and used
observation.
appropriate
Basic
3. Curriculum teaching and
Education 7% If onsite / face-to-face / in-person classes are not
and Planning learning resources,
Services implemented,
including ICT, to
• through observation of synchronous /
address learning Efficiency
asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or
goals.
• through observation of a demonstration teaching*
(PPST 4.5.2)
via LAC session.
10. Designed,
Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating
selected, organized
sheet/s or inter-observer agreement form/s done
and used Quality
through onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom
diagnostic,
observation.
formative and
summative
7% If onsite / face-to-face / in-person classes are not
assessment
implemented,
strategies
• through observation of synchronous /
consistent with Efficiency
asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or
curriculum
• through observation of a demonstration teaching*
requirements.
via LAC session.
4. (PPST 5.1.2)
Basic
Assessment Any one (1) of the following:
Education
and ● Individual Learning Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
Services
Reporting ● Peer assessment data
● Sample of learners’ output with reflection / self- Quality
11. Monitored and
assessment
evaluated learner
● Progress charts/anecdotal records
progress and
● Class/e-class record/grading sheets
achievement using 7%
● Lesson plans showing index of mastery
learner attainment
● Frequency of errors with identified least/most
data.
mastered skills
(PPST 5.2.2)
● Any equivalent ALS form/document that highlights Timeliness
the objective (e.g., Individual Learning Agreement
(ILA), ALS Assessment Form 2)
● Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Any one (1) of the following:

● A sample of corrected test paper of a learner in a

learning area with parent’s or guardian’s signature
and date of receipt
Quality
● Minutes of meetings with key stakeholders (e.g.,
12. Communicated PTA, SGC, SPT, CPC) with proof of attendance
promptly and clearly
the learners’ needs, ● Report card with parent’s or guardian’s signature
4.
Basic progress and in all quarters supported by minutes of meeting
Assessment
Education achievement to key 7%
and
Services stakeholders, ● Communication with key stakeholders (e.g.,
Reporting
including parents/guardians, co-teachers, LGU) using various
parents/guardians. modalities
(PPST 5.4.2)
● Anecdotal record showing entries per quarter
Timeliness
● Any equivalent ALS form/document that highlights
the objective

● Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

13. Applied a
personal philosophy A reflection/journal entry that highlights the Quality
of teaching that is 7% application of a learner-centered teaching
learner-centered. philosophy in the lesson plan or community work
Timeliness
(PPST 7.1.2)

5. Personal Quality
Basic 14. Set professional
Growth and
Education development goals
Professional 1. Certification from the ICT Coordinator / School
Services based on the
Development Head / Focal Person in charge of e-SAT
Philippine
7% 2. IPCRF-DP Efficiency
Professional
3. Mid-year Review Form (MRF)
Standards for
4. Updated IPCRF-DP from Phase II
Teachers.
(PPST 7.5.2)
Timeliness
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Any one (1) proof of:

● committee involvement;

● involvement as module/learning material Quality

writer/validator;

● involvement as a resource
person/speaker/learning facilitator in in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated TV/radio-based instruction;
15. Performed
various related ● book or journal authorship/
works / co-authorship/contributorship;
Basic
PLUS activities that
Education 2% Efficiency
FACTOR contribute to ● advisorship/coordinatorship/ chairpersonship;
Services
the teaching-
learning ● participation in demonstration teaching;
process.
● participation as research presenter in a
forum/conference;

● mentoring of pre-service/in-service teachers;

● conducted research within the rating period; Timeliness

● others (please specify)

with annotation on how it contributed to the
teaching-learning process.

MICHELLE M. SEGUNDO RODELYN E. HERNANDEZ DANTE G. PARUNGAO, CESO V

Rater Ratee Approving Authority