Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exploring Avifaunal Communities: A Comparative Study in Mehsana, North Gujarat
Exploring Avifaunal Communities: A Comparative Study in Mehsana, North Gujarat
(ISSN – 2750-1396)
VOLUME 04 ISSUE 02 Pages: 1-5
SJIF IMPACT FACTOR (2021: 5.478) (2022: 5.636) (2023: 6.741)
OCLC – 1368736135
Research Article
Journal Website:
Submission Date: January 22, 2024, Accepted Date: January 27, 2024,
http://sciencebring.co Published Date: February 01, 2024
m/index.php/ijasr Crossref doi: https://doi.org/10.37547/ijasr-04-02-01
Copyright: Original
content from this work
Aditya Khandla
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons attributes Department of Life Science, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan, Gujarat, India
4.0 licence.
Dharmik Parihar
Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology Research Laboratory, Department of Biosciences, Ugc-Center of
Advance Studies, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
ABSTRACT
This comparative study investigates the avifaunal communities in Mehsana, North Gujarat, to elucidate
biodiversity dynamics in the region. Three distinct avifaunal communities are examined, shedding light on
species composition, distribution patterns, and habitat preferences. Through field observations and data
analysis, this research explores the factors influencing avian diversity and abundance across different
habitats and landscapes in Mehsana. Findings contribute to our understanding of avian ecology and
conservation priorities in North Gujarat, providing insights for biodiversity management and habitat
preservation efforts.
KEYWORDS
Avifaunal communities, Mehsana, North Gujarat, Biodiversity dynamics, Species composition, Distribution
patterns, Habitat preferences, Conservation, Ecology.
INTRODUCTION
Mehsana, nestled in the heart of North Gujarat, natural landscapes that serve as habitats for a
boasts a rich tapestry of ecological diversity and myriad of avifaunal species. As a region of
Mehsana. Measures such as species richness, during optimal birding hours to maximize species
species evenness, and abundance indices were detection and minimize observer bias.
calculated to quantify avian community structure
Data on avian species composition, abundance,
and composition. Comparative analyses allowed
and habitat preferences were meticulously
for the identification of significant differences in
recorded during field surveys. Species
avian diversity metrics among the sampled
identification was facilitated using field guides,
habitats, providing valuable insights into the
binoculars, and bird calls. Information on habitat
distribution patterns and habitat associations of
characteristics, including vegetation structure,
avifaunal species in the region.
water availability, and human disturbances, was
Throughout the process, ethical considerations also documented to contextualize avian
were paramount, with measures in place to distribution patterns and habitat associations.
ensure the ethical treatment of wildlife and
Quantitative data obtained from field surveys
adherence to regulatory guidelines governing
were subjected to statistical analysis to assess
wildlife research and conservation in Gujarat.
patterns of avian diversity and abundance across
Field activities were conducted in accordance
different habitats in Mehsana. Measures such as
with permits and regulations, minimizing
species richness, species evenness, and
disturbance to avian species and their habitats.
abundance indices were calculated to quantify
The study selected three distinct habitats in avian community structure and composition.
Mehsana, North Gujarat, representing diverse Comparative analyses were conducted to identify
ecosystems: agricultural lands, wetlands, and significant differences in avian diversity metrics
urban areas. These habitats were chosen based on among the sampled habitats.
their ecological significance and potential to
Ethical guidelines for wildlife research and
support varied avifaunal communities. Sampling
observation were strictly adhered to throughout
sites within each habitat were identified to ensure
the study. All field activities were conducted in
representative coverage of the landscape and
accordance with permits and regulations
capture the diversity of avian species.
governing wildlife research and conservation in
Field surveys were conducted across the selected Gujarat. Measures were implemented to
sampling sites to document avifaunal diversity minimize disturbance to avian species and their
and abundance. Trained ornithologists and field habitats, ensuring the ethical treatment of wildlife
biologists conducted systematic observations during data collection.
using standardized protocols, including visual
Despite rigorous sampling efforts, the study
and auditory surveys, to record avian species
acknowledges potential limitations inherent in
present in each habitat. Surveys were conducted
avian surveys, including detection biases,
temporal variability, and habitat heterogeneity.
While efforts were made to standardize survey highest species richness and evenness, followed
protocols and minimize confounding factors, the by agricultural lands and urban areas. These
study recognizes the inherent complexities of findings underscore the importance of diverse
avian ecology and the dynamic nature of habitats in supporting avian biodiversity and
ecosystems. highlight the role of wetlands as critical
ecosystems for avifaunal conservation in
Despite inherent limitations associated with
Mehsana.
avian surveys, including detection biases and
habitat variability, the study provides a robust DISCUSSION
foundation for understanding avifaunal
communities in Mehsana, North Gujarat. By The results of the study provide valuable insights
elucidating the ecological dynamics of avian into the dynamics of avifaunal communities in
populations across different habitats, the Mehsana, North Gujarat, and underscore the
research contributes valuable insights to importance of habitat diversity in supporting
biodiversity conservation and habitat avian biodiversity. Wetlands emerge as key
management efforts in the region. habitats for avian diversity, serving as important
stopover sites for migratory species and
RESULTS providing critical breeding and foraging grounds
for resident birds. Agricultural lands also play a
The comparative study of avifaunal communities significant role in supporting avian populations,
in Mehsana, North Gujarat, revealed distinct albeit with lower species richness compared to
patterns of species composition and abundance wetlands.
across the sampled habitats. Agricultural lands
harbored a diverse array of species adapted to Urbanization and habitat fragmentation pose
open fields and agricultural landscapes, including significant challenges to avian conservation in
raptors, seedeaters, and insectivores. Wetlands Mehsana, with urban areas supporting fewer
supported a rich diversity of waterfowl, waders, species and exhibiting lower diversity compared
and shorebirds, attracted by the abundance of to natural habitats. Anthropogenic disturbances,
aquatic resources and wetland vegetation. Urban including habitat loss, pollution, and urban
areas, characterized by human settlements and sprawl, threaten the integrity of avian habitats
fragmented green spaces, hosted adaptable and pose long-term risks to avifaunal populations
species such as pigeons, sparrows, and mynas, in the region.
adapted to anthropogenic environments.
CONCLUSION
Statistical analyses indicated significant
differences in avian diversity metrics among the In conclusion, the comparative study of avifaunal
sampled habitats, with wetlands exhibiting the communities in Mehsana, North Gujarat, provides
valuable insights into the distribution patterns 5. Senma RC, Acharya CA. Sarus Crane in
and habitat associations of avian species in the Chimnabai Sarovar, North Gujarat. Zoo'sPrint.
region. The findings underscore the importance 2010;25(6):33.
of preserving diverse habitats, particularly 6. Patel CD, Patel MI. Status of avifauna at
wetlands, to safeguard avian biodiversity and Taranga Hill-forest, Gujarat, India. Journal
promote ecosystem resilience in the face of of Threatened Taxa. 2010;2:695-699.
anthropogenic pressures. 7. Birds of Gujarat: An online database of birds of
Gujrat.Available:http://www.birdsofgujarat.c
Moving forward, conservation efforts in Mehsana
o.in/(Accessed date: April 22, 2020)
must prioritize habitat preservation, restoration,
8. eBird: An online database of bird
and sustainable land management practices to
distribution and abundance [web
ensure the long-term viability of avian
application]. eBird, Cornell Lab of
populations. Public awareness and community
Ornithology, Ithaca, New
engagement initiatives are also essential for
York.Available:http://www.ebird.org(Access
fostering a culture of environmental stewardship
ed date: April 22, 2020)
and promoting coexistence between humans and
9. Lepage D. Checklist of the birds of Mahesana.
wildlife in Mehsana, North Gujarat. By integrating
Avibase, the world bird
ecological research, conservation action, and
database.Available:https://avibase.bsceoc.or
community participation, we can work towards
g/checklist.jsp?lang=EN®Ion=Innwgjma&
safeguarding avifaunal diversity and enhancing
lIst=clements&format=1[21/04/2020]
the ecological integrity of Mehsana for
10. Parihar A, Dal P, Khandla Y, Parmar D,
generations to come.
Parihar V, Parmar H. Checklist of avifauna
from some selected sites of Visnagar city,
REFERENCES Mehsana, North Gujarat. Journal of
Entomology and Zoology
1. Sibley CG, Monroe BL. Distribution and
Studies.2020;8(2):1232-1243.
taxonomy of birds of the world. Yale
11. Champion HG, Seth SK. A revised survey of
University Press.1990;1-1111.
the forest types of India: Government of
2. Praveen J, Jayapal R, Pittie A. A checklist of
India Publication Division. New Delhi.
the birds of India. Indian Birds.
1968;1-404.
2016;11(5&6):113-72.
12. Ali S, Ripley SD. Handbook of the birds of
3. Parasharya BM, BoradCK, Rank DN. A
India and Pakistan.Compact Edition, Oxford
checklist of the birds of Gujarat. Bird
University Press, Oxford. 1983;1-737.
Conservation Society, Gujarat. 2004;1-44.
4. Ganpule P. The birds of Gujarat: Status and
distribution. Flamingo. 2016;8(3):12.