Refuting Major Allegations of Hinduphobes-Compressed

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 195

REFUTATION OF ALL THE MAJOR

LIES SPREAD BY HINDUPHOBES


Introduction

In recent times, there has been a significant


increase in Hinduphobic activities, with
Hinduphobes developing a habit of portraying
Hindu scriptures in a wrong manner. Nowadays,
on almost every online platform, such
misinterpretations of the sacred texts of Sanatan
Dharma are being showcased. They try to
misrepresent the scriptures and misquote them,
leading those Hindus who have less knowledge
about their own religion to doubt their faith. The
purpose of writing this small project of refutation
of all Hinduphobic claims, is to ensure that no
Hindu goes against their own religion due to the
misquotes and misrepresentations by
Hinduphobes. This book aims to refute the major
lies spread by Hinduphobes regarding the
scriptures of Sanatan Dharma.

if there is any kind of mistake/error in this


project of refutation of Hinduphobe's claims then
please forgive me .
TABLE OF CONTENTS

S.no Chapter Name Page number


1 Exposing lies of Hinduphobes 3
on yaswamedha yagya

2 what is Niyog 10

3 Lord Shiva and mohini 17


incarnation

4 Exposing lies of Hinduphobes 23


on Shivlinga

5 Exposing all lies of Hinduphobes 28


on Bhagwan Shree Krishna

6 Exposing all lies of Hinduphobes 44


on Bhagwan Shree Ram

Reality of Vishnu tulsi episode


58
7
Refuting allegation on Lord
66
Barhma and Devi Saraswati

71
Exposing every lie of
8
Hinduphobe on Manusmriti
10 Refuting false narratives on Goddes Kali 97

11 Reality of Sati pratha 105

12 Does Hinduism allowes to beat wife , 110


Refuting lies of Hinduphobes

13 Is there is violence in Vedas? 118

14 Were the Rishis author of Vedas 126


refuting biggest Hinduphobe website

15 Did Bhasmashura truly frighten Lord Shiva? 139

Refuting allegation on incest on Prajapati 143


16 daksha towards his sister

Is "Tathagat Gautama" mentioned in Valmiki 148


17 Ramayana? blunders of Neo Buddhist

18 Does Hinduism allow child marriage? 154

Refuting claims of Hinduphobes on scientific 163


19 error in Hindu scriptures

Were Vedas written 500 years ago ?


20 171

Episode two on refuting each and every


21 177
arguement on Shivalinga
Har Har Mahadev

1
2
Chapter -1
Exposing lies of Hinduphobes
on yaswamedha yagya

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Chapter -2
What is Niyoga?

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Chapter -3
Lord Shiva And mohini
episode

17
18
19
BRAHMANDA PURAN , UTARBHAGA 6

20
21
22
Chapter - 4
What is Shiv linga ?
Symbol or Male organ

23
24
25
26
27
Chapter -5
Exposing all lies of Hinduphobes
on Bhagwan Shree Krishna

28
How did Shree Krishna married 16108
women?

29
30
31
32
33
4.1 - Did Bhagwan Shree Krishna married
his own cousin sister?

34
34
35
36
4.2- What is Raas Leela?

37
38
39
40
4.3 - How did Shree Krishna had so
many childern with his 16000 wives?

Srimad Bhagawatam 10.61.4


The arched eyebrows of these sixteen thousand queens enchantingly
expressed those ladies’ secret intentions through coyly smiling sidelong
glances. Thus their eyebrows boldly sent forth conjugal messages. Yet
even with these arrows of Cupid, and with other means as well, they
could not agitate Lord Kṛṣṇa’s senses.

According to Srimad Bhagawatam those 16k


Women could not even tempt Shree Krishna, so
how he did he have so many childern?
The answer is in Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Madhya-lila, 20.273
svänga-visesābhāsa-rūpe prakrti-sparśana jiva-rupa 'bija' tate
kailā samarpana

"To impregnate with the seeds of the living entities, the Lord
Himself does not directly touch the material energy Further
explained:- In the conditioned stage we impregnate according
to the bodily conception - thahis, by sexual intercourse - but
the Supreme Lord does not need sexual intercourse to
impregnate. The impregnation is performed simply by His
glance.

41
4.4 - What was relation of Shree Krishna with
gopis?

Shrimad Bhagwatam (10/59/42)

" Then the imperishable Supreme Personality,


assuming a separate form for each bride, duly
married all the princesses simultaneously,
each in her own palace." 16,108 Krishnas
married 16,108 Queens.

Shri Garg Samhita (1/5/32) "16,000 Queens


were incarnation of Goddess Lakshmi"

Skand Puran, Book 2 - Vaishnav Khand, 6th


chapter - Conversation between Devi Yamuna
and Consorts of Krishna Yamuna Said - "
Radha is soul of Krishna .....I saw the
reflection of Rukmini and other Krishna's
other Queens in Radha".

42
Did Shree Krishna married 8 year old Rukmini
mata?

Hinduphobes claims that Skanda Purana Book


V, Section iii, Chapter 142, Verses 8-79 says
Rukmini marrled Krishna when she was eight
years old. But something is wrong here. The
Sanskrit words used there to say she has come
to the age of eight years are "sA kAla paryAya
Adashtavarsha". Here SA means she, Kala
means time, paryAya means lapse of a
particular time. But in the term "Adashta
varsha", the word Ad (आद) is ignored while
translating and only ashtavarsha is translated as
eight years old. But the prefix आद clearly here
denotes some other lining like she has become
twice eight years old or two plus eightie,
tén)16 years old. So, we can't conclude that
Rukmini's age was eight when she married
Krishna with this verse.

43
Chapter-6
Exposing every lies of Hinduphobes
on Bhagwan Shree Ram

44
Why Bhagwan Shree Ram killed
Shambuka?

45
46
47
48
Did Shree Ram ate meat?

Also in Valmiki Ramayan , Hanuman ji


said this to Maa Sita in 5.36.41

49
Did Shree Ram married 6 year old Sita
Maa?

50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
Chapter - 7
Reality of Vishnu - Tulsi
episode

58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Chapter - 8
Refuting allegation on
Brahma ji and Saraswati devi

66
67
68
69
70
Chapter -9
Exposing every lie of Hinduphobes on
Manusmriti

71
In this chapter, we will address the allegations
of Hinduphobia on Manusmriti from Twitter.
The references to these accusations are
marked in black boxes.

72
@hinduphobe

73
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
On page 79

84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
Chapter - 10
Refuting false narratives on
Goddes Kali

97
CHAPTER

98
99
100
101
102
103
104
Chapter - 11
Reality of Sati Pratha

105
Remarriage after husband's death
Smritis such as Manusmriti and Vasista Dharma Sutra
allow remarriage of widows only if the marriage hasn't
been consummated.

Baudhyana Dharma Sutra 4.1.16 "If after (a damsel)


has been given away, or even after (the nuptial
sacrifice) have been offered, the husband dies, she
who (thus) has left (her father's house) and has
returned, may be again wedded according to the rule
applicable to second weddings, provided the
marriage had not been consummated."

Vasistha Dharma Shastra 17.74 "If a damsel at the


death of her husband had been merely wedded by
(the recitation of) sacred texts, and if the marriage
had not been consummated, she may be married
again."

Manusmriti 9.176 "If she be (still) a virgin, or one who


returned (to her first husband) after leaving him, she
is worthy to again perform with her second (or first
deserted) husband the (nuptial) ceremony."
106
Several scriptures which allow widows to remarry even
after the death of her husband and silent about the
consummation

Naradha Smriti 12.97 "When her husband is lost or dead,


when he has become a religious ascetic, when he is
impotent, when he has been expelled from caste, in these
cases a woman may be Justified in another husband.

Parashara Smriti 4.28 "When her husband is missing or is


dead or has renounced the world or is impotent or has
been degraded by sin, - on the any of the said five
calamities, she can remarry"

Garuda Purana 1.107.28 "In case of disappearance or death


or renunciation or impotent or lost caste status of her
husband, in these five cases a woman is allowed to take
another husband."

Agni Purana 154.4-7 "Women are allowed to have another


husband in the following five adversaries;- (the first
husband) is lost, dead, has become an ascetic, impotent or
fallen morally. If the husband is dead, she should be given
to the brother of the deceased. In the absence of brother,
she should be given to anyone as one wished"

107
We read in scriptures that it was upon to woman if
she want to commit Sati.

Vishnu Dharma Sutra 25.17 "A good wife, who


perseveres in a chaste life after the death of her
lord, will go to heaven like (perpetual) students,
even though she has no son.

Parasara Smriti 4.29 "If a woman has led a continent


life, after her lord departed this life, she wins a
region of bliss after her death, like to the well-known
male observers of a celibate life."

Agni Purana 222.20 "the lady practicing continence


after the death of her husband, goes to heaven.

Vrihaspati Smriti 24.11 "A wife is considered half the


body (of her husband), equally sharing the result of
his good or wicked deeds; whether she ascends the
pile after him, or chooses to survive him leading a
virtuous life, she promotes the welfare of her
husband."

108
Text from the 16th century also conveys a
similar

Historical evidence supports the rarity of


the practice of Sati, as mentioned by
historian Meenakshi Jain in her book on the
subject.

109
Chapter - 12
Does Hinduism allows to beat
wife? Refuting lies of
Hinduphobes

110
Hinduphobes often cite the following
verses to argue that Hinduism
permits spousal abuse:

Garuda Purana 1.109.31


Manusmriti 8.299
Ramcharitmanas Sundarkanda
Doha 58.3
Brihdayenka Upanishad 6.4.7
Matsya Purana 227.154
Agni Purana 227-43-47
This chapter will debunk these
allegations

111
Ramcharitmanas , Sundarkanda doha 58.3
प्रभु भल कीन्ह मोहि सिख दीन्हीं। मरजादा पुनि तुम्हरी कीन्हीं ॥ ढोल गवाँर सूद्र
पसु नारी। सकल ताड़ना के अधिकारी ॥
भावार्थ :- (समुद्र देव राम से कह रहे है) प्रभु ने अच्छा किया जो मुझे शिक्षा दी,
किंतु मर्यादा (जीवों का स्वभाव) भी आपकी ही बनाई हुई है। ढोल, गँवार, शूद्र,
पशु और स्त्री- ये सब शिक्षा के अधिकारी हैं।

Here these lines are said by Samudradev when is is taught


lesson by Lord Rama, after getting understood he says
these lines that women, artisans, etc are always invited for
knowledge

112
113
114
Exposing lies on Manusmriti
8.299

115
116
Hinduphobe's claims on Skanda puran & Shiva
puran , that these two verses allow to beat wife

117
118
Chapter - 13
Is there is violation in
Vedas?

119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
Chapter - 14
Are the Rishis author of Vedas?
Refuting biggest Hinduphobe website

128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
Chapter -15
Did Bhasmasura frighten Lord Shiva?

139
140
141
142
Chapter-16
Refuting incest allegation on
Prajapati Daksha towards his sister

143
144
145
146
147
Chapter - 17
Is "Tathagat Gautama"
mentioned in Valmiki Ramayan ?
Blunders of Neo buddhisht

148
149
150
151
152
153
Chapter - 18
Does Hinduism allow child
marriage?

154
155
156
157
158
159
160
160
161
162
Chapter 19
Debunking Claims of Hinduphobes
Regarding Scientific Errors in Hindu
Scriptures

163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
Chapter - 19
Were Vedas written 500 years ago
(before present)according to unesco
?

171
Hinduphobe's allegation - The Vedas
we have today are not authentic and
were written 500 years ago, because
oldest manuscript of vedas is 500
years old

Answer -The Vedas were originaly


preserved orally and not in written
form, and we have plenty of evidence
to show that the Vedas we have
today are 100% authentic with the
oral tradition. Let's look at some
evidence for this.

172
173
174
175
176
Chapter - 21
Refuting each and every
allegation on Shivlinga

177
In chapter 4 ,on page 23 it has been proven that
Shiv linga represent Symbol of Shiva not phallus,
but there is other allegations too on Shivlinga ,
which will be refute in this chapter

178
Hinduphobe people claims that , In Daruwana
incident Lord Shiva's linga was cut down and fall
and according to Hinduphobes that linga was
genital organ. so lets refute this allegation

Linga puran alone refute their allegation , it says in


Daruwana incident , Lord Shiva had holded fire
band(agni lingam) , and it was fell down too , not any
genital organ.
179
180
Does Gudimallam linga represent phallus?
Lets understand in details through
inconograohy.

181
182
183
184
185
186
187
KALIYUG VERSE

You might also like