Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Admininistration and Planning. Gaby
Admininistration and Planning. Gaby
TOPIC TWO
THEORIES OF EDUCATION ADMINSTRATION AND MANAGEMENT
What is a theory?
It is a set of principles on which the practice of an activity is based.
There is no single all-embracing theory of educational management. In fact, the theories found in
education management are largely management theories applied to education.
SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT THEORY by Fredrick Taylor
Scientific management theory is the application of industrial engineering principles to create a
system where waste is avoided, the process and method of production is improved, and goods are
fairly distributed.
Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915) was an American inventor and engineer that applied his
engineering and scientific knowledge to management and developed a theory called scientific
management theory. His two most important books on his theory are Shop Management
(1903) and The Principles of Scientific Management (1911).
He started the Scientific Management movement, and he and his associates were the first people
to study the work process scientifically. They studied how work was performed, and they looked at
how this affected worker productivity. Taylor's philosophy focused on the belief that making people
work as hard as they could was not as efficient as optimizing the way the work was done.
In 1909, Taylor published "The Principles of Scientific Management." In this, he proposed that by
optimizing and simplifying jobs, productivity would increase. He also advanced the idea that
workers and managers needed to cooperate with one another. This was very different from the way
work was typically done in businesses beforehand. A factory manager at that time had very little
contact with the workers, and he left them on their own to produce the necessary product. There
was no standardization, and a worker's main motivation was often continued employment, so there
was no incentive to work as quickly or as efficiently as possible.
Taylor believed that all workers were motivated by money, so he promoted the idea of "a fair day's
pay for a fair day's work." In other words, if a worker didn't achieve enough in a day, he didn't
deserve to be paid as much as another worker who was highly productive.
With a background in mechanical engineering, Taylor was very interested in efficiency. While
advancing his career at a U.S. steel manufacturer, he designed workplace experiments to
determine optimal performance levels. In one, he experimented with shovel design until he had a
design that would allow workers to shovel for several hours straight. With bricklayers, he
experimented with the various motions required and developed an efficient way to lay bricks. And
he applied the scientific method to study the optimal way to do any type of workplace task. As
such, he found that by calculating the time needed for the various elements of a task, he could
develop the "best" way to complete that task.
These "time and motion" studies also led Taylor to conclude that certain people could work more
efficiently than others. These were the people whom managers should seek to hire where possible.
Therefore, selecting the right people for the job was another important part of workplace efficiency.
Taking what he learned from these workplace experiments, Taylor developed four principles of
scientific management. These principles are also known simply as "Taylorism".
Four Principles of Scientific Management
Taylor's four principles are as follows:
1. Replace working by "rule of thumb," or simple habit and common sense, and instead use the
scientific method to study work and determine the most efficient way to perform specific tasks.
2. Rather than simply assign workers to just any job, match workers to their jobs based on
capability and motivation, and train them to work at maximum efficiency.
3. Monitor worker performance, and provide instructions and supervision to ensure that they're
using the most efficient ways of working.
4. Allocate the work between managers and workers so that the managers spend their time
planning and training, allowing the workers to perform their tasks efficiently.
Critiques of Taylorism
Taylor's Scientific Management Theory promotes the idea that there is "one right way" to do
something. As such, it is at odds with current approaches and other tools like them. These promote
individual responsibility, and seek to push decision making through all levels of the organization.
5. Greater cooperation between management and workers with a consistent application of Taylor s
theory of management.
Question
The influence of Taylor’s scientific management theory is still found in schools today. Discuss
2. Hierarchy:
The basic feature of bureaucratic organisation is that there is hierarchy of positions in the
organisation. Hierarchy is a system of ranking various positions in descending scale from top to
bottom of the organisation. In bureaucratic organisation, offices also follow the principle of
hierarchy; that is, each lower office is subject to control and supervision by higher office.
Thus, no office is left uncontrolled in the organisation. This is the fundamental concept of
hierarchy in bureaucratic organisation.
This hierarchy serves as lines of communication and delegation of authority. It implies that
communication coming down or going up must pass through each position.
Similarly, a subordinate will get authority from his immediate superior.
However, this hierarchy is not unitary but sub-pyramids of officials within the large organisation
corresponding to the same authority.
Functional divisions exist. Thus, there are offices with the same amount of authority but with
different kinds of functions operating in different areas of competence. For example, the
Government organizations, we can observe separate offices looking after particular functions.
This happens in business organizations too.
3. Division of Work:
Work of the organization is divided on the basis of specialization. To take the advantages of
division of labour, each office in the bureaucratic organization has specific sphere of
competence.
This involves:
(i) a sphere of obligations to perform functions which has been marked off as part of a
systematic division of labour;
(ii) the provision of the incumbent with necessary authority to carry out these functions; and
(iii) the necessary means of compulsion are clearly defined and their use is subject to definite
conditions.
Thus, division of labour try to ensure that each office has a clearly-defined area of competence
within the organisation and each official knows the areas in which he operates and the areas in
which he must abstain from action so that he does not overstep the boundary between his role
and those of others. Further, division of labour also tries to ensure that no work is left
uncovered.
4. Official Rules:
A basic and most emphasised feature of bureaucratic organisation is that administrative
process is continuous and governed by official rules. Bureaucratic organisation is the antithesis
of ad hoc, temporary and unstable relations. A rational approach to organisation calls for a
system of maintaining rules to ensure twin requirements of uniformity and coordination of
efforts by individual members in the organisation.
5. Impersonal Relationships:
A notable feature of bureaucracy is that relationships among individuals are governed through
the system of official authority and rules. Official positions are free from personal involvement,
emotions and sentiments. Thus, decisions are governed by rational factors rather than
personal factors. This impersonality concept is used in dealing with organisational relations as
well as relations between the organisation and outsiders.
6. Official Record:
Bureaucratic organisation is characterised by maintenance of proper official records. The
decisions and activities of the organisation are formally recorded and preserved for future
reference. This is made possible by extensive use of filing system in the organisation. An
official record is almost regarded as encyclopedia of various activities performed by the people
in the organisation.
Benefits of Bureaucracy:
The following are the advantages of Bureaucracy:
1. The rules and procedures are decided for every work thus leading to consistency in
employee behavior since employees are bound to follow the rules. Consequently, the
management process becomes easy.
2. The duties and responsibilities of each job are clearly defined so there is no question of
overlapping or conflicting job duties.
3. The selection process and promotion procedures are based on merit and expertise. This
assists in putting the right persons on right jobs thus there is optimum utilisation of human
resources.
4. The division of labour assists workers in becoming experts in their jobs. The performance of
employees improves considerably.
5. The enterprise does not suffer when some persons leave. If one person leaves then some
other occupies that place and the work does not suffer.
Disadvantages of Bureaucracy:
1. This system suffers from too much of red tape and paper work.
2. The employees do not develop belongingness to the organization.
3. The excessive reliance on rules and regulations and adherence to these policies inhibit
initiative and growth of the employees. They are treated like machines and not like individuals.
There is neglect of human factor.
4. The employees become so used to the system that they resist any change and introduction
of new techniques of operations.
5. Rules are normally provided for guidelines but often they become source of inefficiency
because of too much emphasis on rules, their misuse, and people’s apathy because of them.
6. Rigid organisational hierarchy works against efficiency. It overemphasizes superior-
subordinate relationships unnecessarily which is detrimental to congenial organisational
climate.
7. In dealing with people, total impersonal approach cannot be adopted because people have
feelings, emotions and sentiments which affect decision. Thus, people cannot work totally
according to rules and prescriptions.
Questions:
1. How has modern practice of education been influenced by bureaucracy? Cite specific
examples
2. Explain the merits and demerits of bureaucracy
QUESTION
How does administrative management theory apply in education management and administration
today?
TOPIC THREE
THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP
Definition of leadership.
Leadership is a process in which intentional influence is exerted by one person over other people
in order to structure the activities and relationships in a group or organization.
Leadership theories attempt to explain the role leaders play in influencing others and the
relationship between leadership and organizational effectiveness.
There are four major categories of leadership theory and each category is based on the central
focus of the theory’s approach to leadership. They are:
1. Trait theories of leadership
2. Behavior of leaders
3. Transformational, visionary and moral leadership
4. Power approaches to leadership.
WHY STUDY LEADERSHIP THEORIES?
Understanding leadership theories will help school leaders:
i. assess personal strengths and weaknesses related to skills necessary for effective leadership
ii. Utilize power appropriately in order to positively influence and gain commitment from others
iii. Examine personal values and beliefs in relationship to assumptions about leadership and
followership
iv. Understand the various roles of leadership
V. recognize the relationship between task-oriented and people oriented leadership behaviours
vii. Realize the importance of moral purpose and ethical values for leadership
TRAIT THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP
Early studies of leadership sought to indentify traits and characteristics that distinguished leaders
from non-leaders. Yukl (1994) summarized the major findings from leadership research that
attempted to indentify traits and skills related to organizational effectiveness. He identified eight
broad personality traits that contribute to leadership effectiveness.
PERSONALITY TRAITS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS:
1. High energy level and stress tolerance.
Studies have found that principals spend about 50% of their time in direct contact with teachers
and students, and the job of the principal is characterized by decision making on the move
(Sergiovanni, 1991). Consequently, a principal’s ability to engage in effective problem solving
requires a capacity to remain calm when dealing with stressful interpersonal conflicts situations.
2. Self confidence
This is necessary in order for educational leaders to take risks and accomplish high goals. Self
confident leaders encourage and reassure teachers and other staff. Moreover, such leaders tend to
deal immediately and directly with problems and conflicts, rather than procrastinating, ignoring or
passing problems to others.
3. Internal locus of control
This refers to the belief that events in one’s life are determined by one’s own actions rather than by
outside events or circumstances. Leaders with an internal locus of control orientation take
responsibility for their actions and exercise more initiative in solving problems.
4. Emotional maturity
This means being well adjusted and being aware of one’s own strengths and weaknesses.
Educational leaders with high emotional maturity generally care about others in their schools,
maintain self-control and are receptive to constructive criticism.
5. Integrity
This denotes honesty, ethical behavior and trustworthiness. Educational leaders who are deceptive
lose credibility with teachers, parents and colleagues, just like those who break promises or
agreements.
6. Power motivation
This refers to one’s internal drive or need for power to influence others. A strong need for power is
associated with strong leadership. However, how this power is used is also relevant. Exercising
power for the benefit of the school organizations results in effective leadership while power used to
satisfy one’s personal gain or statues is ineffective for the organization.
7. Achievement orientation
This refers to the desire to excel and a drive to succeed. Like power motivation, it can either be
positive or negative. It only contributes to leadership effectiveness only when it is combined with a
need for power associated with benefiting others and the school.
8. Need for affiliation
A high need for affiliation means that a person has a strong desire to be liked or accepted by
others. Such tend to avoid conflict and avoid making decisions that may be unpopular. They may
show favoritism and seek approval rather than effectiveness. On the other hand, a leader with a
very low need for affiliation may fail to develop effective interpersonal relations necessary to exert
influence.
SKILLS RELEVANT TO LEADERSHIP
Yukl identified the following skills that are relevant for leadership
1. Technical skills
These involve knowledge of the specialized activities of the organization or unit which the leader
supervises, gained through formal education and experiences.
2. Interpersonal skills
This include and understanding of human behavior and group processes, the capacity to discern
other’s feelings and motives and the ability to effectively communicate and persuade.
3. Conceptual skills
These include logical thinking, inductive and deductive reasoning, analytical ability and creative
thinking.
All the three skills are necessary for leadership, but the relative importance of each depends on the
situation.
4. Level of Management
Authority depends on the level of management. The higher the level of management, the
higher will be the authority and vice-versa.
Power does not depend on the level of management. Power can exist at any level of
management. Even a lower-level manager or a worker can have power to influence the
behaviour of a top-level manager.
5. Legitimacy
Authority is always official in nature. So it is legitimate.
Power need not be official in nature. So it need not be legitimate.
6. Position and Person
Authority is given to a position or post. The manager gets the authority only when he holds that
position.
Power resides (lives) in the person who uses it.
BEHAVIOR OF LEADERS
This is another approach given to the study of leadership. It is majorly founded on Douglas
McGregor (1960) who explained leader’s action as resulting from their beliefs and assumptions
about the people at work. This gave rise to Theory X and Theory Y, which are two opposing
sets of beliefs.
Theory X.
Leaders believe that
1. The average human being has an inherent dislike of work and will avoid it if possible.
2. Most people must be coerced, controlled, directed and threatened with punishment to get
them to put forth adequate effort toward achievement of organizational objectives.
3. The average person prefers to be directed, wishes to avoid responsibility, has little ambition
and wants security above all.
Consequently, theory X leaders must organize, direct and control workers through persuasion,
rewards, punishment or coercion.
Theory X management can take either a hard or soft approach. A hard one is characterized by
close supervision, tight controls over behavior, coercion and veiled threats. The soft approach
involves permissiveness in order to satisfy people’s demands in an effort to get their
compliance.
McGregor (1960) came up with a third approach which entails combining the hard and soft
approaches and referred to it as the “carrot and stick” approach. The Carrot and Stick
approach of motivation is based on the principles of reinforcement and is given by a
philosopher Jeremy Bentham, during the industrial revolution. This theory is derived from the
old story of a donkey: the best way to move him is to put a carrot in front of him and jab him
with a stick from behind. The carrot is a reward for moving while the stick is the punishment for
not moving and hence making him move forcefully.
Thus, an individual is given carrot i.e. reward when he performs efficiently and is jabbed with a
stick or is given a punishment in case of non-performance.
Theory Y
In introducing this theory, McGregor (1960) agreed that the human side of enterprise has
become a major preoccupation of management and thus rise of policies and practices that
stressed equity, humanitarianism and safe, pleasant working conditions.
He based his assumptions of theory Y on the following:
1. The expenditure of physical and mental effort in work is as natural as play or rest.
2. People will exercise self-direction and self-control in the service of objectives to which they
are committed.
3. Commitment to objectives is the function of rewards associated with their achievement,
specifically ego and self-actualization.
4. The average human being not only accepts but also seeks responsibility.
5. People are generally creative, imaginative, and possess ingenuity.
6. In most work environments, the intellectual potential of the average person is only partially
utilized.
Because of the nature of people, a leader will need both approaches, depending on the
circumstances. However, it is generally observed that a purely Theory X approach would be
ineffective in the 21st century.
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
This is the more recent approach to leadership, which attempts to describe leadership
effectiveness based on how leaders transform their organizations. This recent body of
leadership, known as transformational leadership theory, was proposed by James MacGregor
Burns’ (1978).
He proposed that leadership is inseparable from the needs and goals of the followers, and that
it is a result of the interaction between the leaders and followers. He distinguished between two
fundamental leader-follower relations: transactional and transformational.
Transactional leadership is whereby leaders influence followers through exchange of
something valued by both the leader and the follower. For instance, a head teacher can receive
support for remedial classes in exchange for free lunch.
Transformational leadership, on the other hand, involves an engagement between leaders and
followers bound by common purpose where both raise each other to higher levels of motivation
and morality.
Bernard Bass and Bruce Avolio (1994) explained transformation leadership in terms of leader’s
behavior. Transformational leaders employ one or more of the following behavior:
Idealized influence: leaders act as role models and are admired, respected and trusted. They
can do this by considering others’ needs ahead of their own, sharing risks with followers, being
consistent rather than arbitrary and demonstrating ethical and moral conduct.
Inspirational motivation: leaders motivate and inspire by giving meaning and challenge to
followers’ work and a team spirit is developed. They do this by involving others in visionary
activities, clearly communication expectations and demonstrating vommitment to shared goals
and vision.
Intellectual stimulation: leaders stiululate others to be innovative and vreative. They do so by
soliciting new ideas from others, not publicly criticizing followers’ mistaeks and encouraging
othes to ry new approaches.
Individualized consideration: leaders attend to individual needs for achievement and growth by
acting as a mentor or coach. They do so by accepting individual differences and supervising
according to individual needs, encouraging two-way communication, listening and delegating.
The underlying principle of transformation leadership is the concept of a leader’s commitment
to moral purpose and personal values as essential to bringing about organizational change.
CONTINGENCY THEORY
Contingency theories put forth the idea that the success of a leader hinges on the specific
situation at hand. Certain factors come into play that define whether a particular leader or
leadership style will be effective for the given situation. Those factors include the task, the
personality of the leader and the composition of the group that is meant to be led. Its basic
assumption is that leadership – success or failure – is situational.
There are a number of different sub-theories that fall under the general contingency umbrella.
They include: Fiedler’s Contingency Theory, the Situational Leadership Theory, the Path-Goal
Theory and the Decision-Making Theory. While all similar on the surface, they each offer their
own distinct views on leadership.
Fiedler’s Contingency Theory
This theory puts forth the idea that effective leadership hinges not only on the style used by the
leader, but also on the control held over the situation. In order to succeed, there must be strong
leader-member relations. Leaders must also present tasks clearly and with goals and
procedures outlined. They need to possess the ability to hand out punishments and rewards,
as well.
This particular theory only fits situations where groups are closely supervised and not team-
based. It also uses a least preferred co-worker (LPC) scale to help determine the type of
worker the leader least likes working with. This theory emphasizes the leader’s disposition as
the main trait that defines the ability to lead.
Situational Leadership
More formally called the Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory, this model focuses
on leadership style and the maturity of those being led. The theory puts forth the idea that
leadership styles hinge on four behaviors: telling, selling, participating and delegating.
The maturity levels range from an incompetence or unwillingness to perform the task, to a
willingness and ability to perform. The idea is that a successful leader will adapt leadership
techniques to fit the maturity level of the group in question on a situational basis.
Path-Goal Theory
This theory combines two popular theories – goal-setting and expectancy – into one. It puts
forth the idea that effective leaders help those in their direction attain their goals. Under this
theory, leaders have the responsibility of making sure their subordinates have the support and
information required to achieve the goals set forth. Essentially, this theory holds that effective
leaders create clear paths to help their subordinates achieve goals and that they work to
remove obstacles that stand in the way.
Decision-Making Theory
Also known as the Vroom-Yetton-Jago Decision-Making Model of Leadership, it puts forth the
idea that effective leaders size up situations, assess them and then determine how much
support the group will give toward the effort, adjusting style of leadership to fit.
While contingency models diverge on some points, they all share a common thread. The
overlying viewpoint of this theory is that effective leadership is contingent on the situation, task
and people involved.
TOPIC FOUR
ADMINISTRATIVE TASKS AND PROCESSES
Different experts have classified functions of management (administrative tasks and processes.)
According to George & Jerry, “There are four fundamental functions of management i.e. planning,
organizing, actuating and controlling”.
According to Henry Fayol, “To manage is to forecast and plan, to organize, to command, & to
control”.
Luther Gullick, on the other hand, has given a keyword ’POSDCORB’ where P stands for Planning,
O for Organizing, S for Staffing, D for Directing, Co for Co-ordination, R for reporting & B for
Budgeting.
But the most widely accepted are functions of management given by KOONTZ and O’DONNEL i.e.
Planning, Organizing, Staffing, Directing and Controlling.
For theoretical purposes, it may be convenient to separate the function of management but
practically these functions are overlapping in nature i.e. they are highly inseparable. Each function
blends into the other & each affects the performance of others.
1. Planning
It is the basic function of management. It deals with chalking out a future course of action &
deciding in advance the most appropriate course of actions for achievement of pre-determined
goals. According to KOONTZ, “Planning is deciding in advance - what to do, when & how. It
bridges the gap from where we are & where we want to be”. A plan is a future course of action. It is
an exercise in problem solving & decision making. Planning is determination of courses of action to
achieve desired goals. Thus, planning is a systematic thinking about ways & means for
accomplishment of pre-determined goals. Planning is necessary to ensure proper utilization of
human & non-human resources. It is all pervasive, it is an intellectual activity and it also helps in
avoiding confusion, uncertainties, risks, wastages etc.
2. Organizing
It is the process of bringing together physical, financial and human resources and developing
productive relationship amongst them for achievement of organizational goals. According to Henry
Fayol, “To organize a business is to provide it with everything useful or its functioning i.e. raw
material, tools, capital and personnel”. To organize a business involves determining & providing
human and non-human resources to the organizational structure. Organizing as a process
involves:
• Identification of activities.
• Classification or grouping of activities.
• Assignment of duties.
• Delegation of authority and creation of responsibility.
• Coordinating authority and responsibility relationships.
3. Staffing
It is the function of manning the organization structure and keeping it manned. Staffing has
assumed greater importance in the recent years due to advancement of technology, increase in
size of business, complexity of human behavior etc. The main purpose of staffing is to put right
man on right job i.e. square pegs in square holes and round pegs in round holes. According to
Kootz & O’Donell, “Managerial function of staffing involves manning the organization structure
through proper and effective selection, appraisal & development of personnel to fill the roles
designed in the structure”. Staffing involves:
• Manpower Planning (estimating man power in terms of searching, choosing the person and giving
the right place).
• Recruitment, Selection & Placement.
• Training & Development.
• Remuneration.
• Performance Appraisal.
• Promotions & Transfer.
4. Directing
It is that part of managerial function which actuates the organizational methods to work efficiently
for achievement of organizational purposes. It is considered life-spark of the enterprise which sets
it in motion; the action of people because planning, organizing and staffing are the mere
preparations for doing the work. Direction is that inert-personnel aspect of management which
deals directly with influencing, guiding, supervising, motivating the sub-ordinate for the
achievement of organizational goals. Direction has the following elements:
• Supervision
• Motivation
• Leadership
• Communication
Supervision- implies overseeing the work of subordinates by their superiors. It is the act of
watching & directing work & workers.
Motivation- means inspiring, stimulating or encouraging the sub-ordinates with zeal to work.
Positive, negative, monetary, non-monetary incentives may be used for this purpose.
Leadership- may be defined as a process by which a manager guides and influences the work of
subordinates in desired direction.
Communications- is the process of passing information, experience, opinion etc from one person to
another. It is a bridge of understanding.
5 Controlling
It implies measurement of accomplishment against the standards and correction of deviation if
any to ensure achievement of organizational goals. The purpose of controlling is to ensure that
everything occurs in conformity with the standards. An efficient system of control helps to predict
deviations before they actually occur. According to Theo Haimann, “Controlling is the process of
checking whether or not proper progress is being made towards the objectives and goals and
acting if necessary, to correct any deviation”. According to Koontz & O’Donell “Controlling is the
measurement & correction of performance activities of subordinates in order to make sure that the
enterprise objectives and plans desired to obtain them as being accomplished”. Therefore
controlling has following steps:
a. Establishment of standard performance.
b. Measurement of actual performance.
c. Comparison of actual performance with the standards and finding out deviation if any.
d. Corrective action.
TOPIC FIVE
COMMUNICATION
Communication is a two-way process of reaching mutual understanding, in which participants not
only exchange (encode-decode) information, news, ideas and feelings but also create and share
meaning. (businessdictionary.com)
In general, communication is a means of connecting people or places. In business, it is a key
function of management--an organization cannot operate without communication between levels,
departments and employees.
Types of communication
Communication can be categorized into three basic types: (1) verbal communication, in which you
listen to a person to understand their meaning; (2) written communication, in which you read their
meaning; and (3) nonverbal communication, in which you observe a person and infer meaning.
Each has its own advantages, disadvantages, and even pitfalls.
Verbal Communication
Verbal communications in business take place over the phone or in person. The medium of the
Message is oral. Here are some more examples:
Storytelling
Storytelling has been shown to be an effective form of verbal communication; it serves an
important organizational function by helping to construct common meanings for individuals within
the organization. Stories can help clarify key values and help demonstrate how things are done
within an organization, and story frequency, strength, and tone are related to higher organizational
commitment (McCarthy, 2008). The quality of the stories entrepreneurs tell is related to their ability
to secure capital for their firms(Martens, et. al., 2007). Stories can serve to reinforce and
perpetuate an organization’s culture, part of the organizing P-O-L-C function.
Crucial Conversations
While the process may be the same, high-stakes communications require more planning,
reflection, and skill than normal day-to-day interactions at work. Examples of high-stakes
communication events include asking for a raise or presenting a business plan to a venture
capitalist. In addition to these events, there are also many times in our professional lives when we
have crucial conversations—discussions where not only the stakes are high but also where
opinions vary and emotions run strong (Patterson, et. al., 2002). One of the most consistent
recommendations from communications experts is to work toward using “and” instead of “but” as
you communicate under these circumstances. In addition, be aware of your communication style
and practice flexibility; it is under stressful situations that communication styles can become the
most rigid.
Written Communication
In contrast to verbal communications, written business communications are printed messages.
Examples of written communications include memos, proposals, e-mails, letters, training manuals,
and operating policies. They may be printed on paper, handwritten, or appear on the screen.
Normally, a verbal communication takes place in real time. Written communication, by contrast, can
be constructed over a longer period of time. Written communication is often asynchronous
(occurring at different times). That is, the Sender can write a Message that the Receiver can read
at any time, unlike a conversation that is carried on in real time. A written communication can also
be read by many people (such as all employees in a department or all customers). It’s a “one-to-
many” communication, as opposed to a one-to-one verbal conversation. There are exceptions, of
course: a voicemail is an oral Message that is asynchronous. Conference calls and speeches are
oral one-to-many communications, and e-mails may have only one recipient or many.
Nonverbal Communication
What you say is a vital part of any communication. But what you don’t say can be even more
important. Research also shows that 55% of in-person communication comes from nonverbal cues
like facial expressions, body stance, and tone of voice. According to one study, only 7% of a
Receiver’s comprehension of a Message is based on the Sender’s actual words; 38% is based on
paralanguage (the tone, pace, and volume of speech), and 55% is based on nonverbal cues(body
language) (Mehrabian, 1981).
For this reason, it is important to consider how we appear in business as well as what we say. The
muscles of our faces convey our emotions. We can send a silent message without saying a word. A
change in facial expression can change our emotional state. Before an interview, for example, if we
focus on feeling confident, our face will convey that confidence to an interviewer. Adopting a smile
(even if we’re feeling stressed) can reduce the body’s stress levels.
Here are a few examples of nonverbal cues that can support or detract from a Sender’s Message.
Body Language
A simple rule of thumb is that simplicity, directness, and warmth convey sincerity. And sincerity is
key to effective communication. A firm handshake, given with a warm, dry hand, is a great way to
establish trust. A weak, clammy handshake conveys a lack of trustworthiness. Gnawing one’s lip
conveys uncertainty. A direct smile conveys confidence.
Eye Contact
In business, the style and duration of eye contact considered appropriate vary greatly across
cultures. In the United States, for example, looking someone in the eye (for about a second) is
considered a sign of trustworthiness.
Facial Expressions
The human face can produce thousands of different expressions. These expressions have been
decoded by experts as corresponding to hundreds of different emotional states (Ekman, et. al.,
2008). Our faces convey basic information to the outside world. Happiness is associated with an
upturned mouth and slightly closed eyes; fear with an open mouth and wide-eyed stare. Flitting
(“shifty”) eyes and pursed lips convey a lack of trustworthiness. The effect of facial expressions in
conversation is instantaneous. Our brains may register them as “a feeling” about someone’s
character.
Posture
The position of our body relative to a chair or another person is another powerful silent messenger
that conveys interest, aloofness, professionalism—or lack thereof. Head up, back straight (but not
rigid) implies an upright character. In interview situations, experts advise mirroring an interviewer’s
tendency to lean in and settle back in her seat. The subtle repetition of the other person’s posture
conveys that we are listening and responding.
Touch
The meaning of a simple touch differs between individuals, genders, and cultures. In Mexico, when
doing business, men may find themselves being grasped on the arm by another man. To pull away
is seen as rude. In Indonesia, to touch anyone on the head or touch anything with one’s foot is
considered highly offensive. In the Far East, according to business etiquette writer Nazir Daud, “it
is considered impolite for a woman to shake a man’s hand (Daud, 2008).” Americans, as we have
noted, place great value in a firm handshake.
Space
Anthropologist Edward T. Hall coined the term proxemics to denote the different kinds of distance
that occur between people. These distances vary between cultures.
Standing too far away from a colleague (such as a public speaking distance of more than seven
feet) or too close to a colleague (intimate distance for embracing) can thwart an effective verbal
communication in business.
The communication process
Communication fulfills three main functions within an organization: (1) transmitting information, (2)
coordinating effort, and (3) sharing emotions and feelings. All these functions are vital to a
successful organization. Transmitting information is vital to an organization’s ability to function.
Coordinating effort within the organization helps people work toward the same goals. Sharing
emotions and feelings bonds teams and unites people in times of celebration and crisis. Effective
communication helps people grasp issues, build rapport with coworkers, and achieve consensus.
So, how can we communicate effectively? The first step is to understand the communication
process.
We all exchange information with others countless times a day, by phone, e-mail, printed word, and
of course, in person. Let’s take a moment to see how a typical communication works using the
Process Model of Communication as a guide.
The Process Model of Communication
Source: http://open.lib.umn.edu/principlesmanagement/chapter/12-3-understanding-
communication/
A Sender, such as a boss, coworker, or customer, originates the Message with a thought. For
example, a boss’s thought could be: “Get more printer toner cartridges!”
The Sender encodes the Message, translating the idea into words.
The boss may communicate this thought by saying, “Hey you guys, we need to order more printer
toner cartridges.”
The medium of this encoded Message may be spoken words, written words, or signs.
The receiver is the person who receives the Message.
The Receiver decodes the Message by assigning meaning to the words.
In this example, the Receiver, Bill, has a to-do list a mile long. “The boss must know how much
work I already have.” the Receiver thinks. Bill’s mind translates his boss’s Message as, “Could you
order some printer toner cartridges, in addition to everything else I asked you to do this week…if
you can find the time?”
The meaning that the Receiver assigns may not be the meaning that the Sender intended because
of such factors as noise.
Noise is anything that interferes with or distorts the Message being transformed. Noise can be
external in the environment (such as distractions) or it can be within the Receiver. For example, the
Receiver may be highly nervous and unable to pay attention to the Message. Noise can even
occur within the Sender: the Sender may be unwilling to take the time to convey an accurate
Message or the words she chooses can be ambiguous and prone to misinterpretation.
Picture the next scene. The place: a staff meeting. The time: a few days later. The boss believes
her Message has been received.
“Are the printer toner cartridges here yet?” she asks.
“You never said it was a rush job!” the Receiver protests.
“But!”
“But!”
Miscommunications like these happen in the workplace every day. We’ve seen that
miscommunication does occur in the workplace. But how does a miscommunication happen? It
helps to think of the communication process. The series of arrows pointing the way from the
Sender to the Receiver and back again can, and often do, fall short of their target.
Barriers to effective communication
Communicating can be more of a challenge than you think, when you realize the many things that
can stand in the way of effective communication. These include filtering, selective perception,
information overload, emotional disconnects, lack of source familiarity or credibility, workplace
gossip, semantics, gender differences, differences in meaning between Sender and Receiver, and
biased language. Let’s examine each of these barriers.
Filtering
Filtering is the distortion or withholding of information to manage a person’s reactions. Some
examples of filtering include a manager who keeps her division’s poor sales figures from her boss,
the vice president, fearing that the bad news will make him angry. The old saying, “Don’t shoot the
messenger!” illustrates the tendency of Receivers (in this case, the vice president) to vent their
negative response to unwanted Messages on the Sender. A gatekeeper (the vice president’s
assistant, perhaps) who doesn’t pass along a complete Message is also filtering. The vice
president may delete the e-mail announcing the quarter’s sales figures before reading it, blocking
the Message before it arrives.
As you can see, filtering prevents members of an organization from getting a complete picture of
the way things are. To maximize your chances of sending and receiving effective communications,
it’s helpful to deliver a Message in multiple ways and to seek information from multiple sources. In
this way, the effect of any one person’s filtering the Message will be diminished.
Since people tend to filter bad news more during upward communication, it is also helpful to
remember that those below you in an organization may be wary of sharing bad news. One way to
defuse the tendency to filter is to reward employees who clearly convey information upward,
regardless of whether the news is good and bad.
Here are some of the criteria that individuals may use when deciding whether to filter a Message or
pass it on:
• Past experience: Was the Sender rewarded for passing along news of this kind in the past, or
was she criticized?
• Knowledge, perception of the speaker: Has the Receiver’s direct superior made it clear that “no
news is good news?”
• Emotional state, involvement with the topic, level of attention: Does the Sender’s fear of failure or
criticism prevent him from conveying the Message? Is the topic within his realm of expertise,
increasing his confidence in his ability to decode it, or is he out of his comfort zone when it comes
to evaluating the Message’s significance? Are personal concerns impacting his ability to judge the
Message’s value?
Once again, filtering can lead to miscommunications in business. Each listener translates the
Message into his or her own words, creating his or her own version of what was said (Alessandra,
1993).
Selective Perception
Selective perception refers to filtering what we see and hear to suit our own needs. This process is
often unconscious. Small things can command our attention when we’re visiting a new place—a
new city or a new company. Over time, however, we begin to make assumptions about the way
things are on the basis of our past experience. Often, much of this process is unconscious. “We
simply are bombarded with too much stimuli every day to pay equal attention to everything so we
pick and choose according to our own needs (Pope, 2008).” Selective perception is a time-saver, a
necessary tool in a complex culture. But it can also lead to mistakes.
Think back to the earlier example conversation between Bill, who was asked to order more toner
cartridges, and his boss. Since Bill found his boss’s to-do list to be unreasonably demanding, he
assumed the request could wait. (How else could he do everything else on the list?) The boss,
assuming that Bill had heard the urgency in her request, assumed that Bill would place the order
before returning to the other tasks on her list.
Both members of this organization were using selective perception to evaluate the communication.
Bill’s perception was that the task of ordering could wait. The boss’s perception was that her time
frame was clear, though unstated. When two selective perceptions collide, a misunderstanding
occurs.
Information Overload
Information overload can be defined as “occurring when the information processing demands on
an individual’s time to perform interactions and internal calculations exceed the supply or capacity
of time available for such processing (Schick, et. al., 1990).” Messages reach us in countless ways
every day. Some are societal—advertisements that we may hear or see in the course of our day.
Others are professional—e-mails, and memos, voice mails, and conversations from our
colleagues. Others are personal—messages and conversations from our loved ones and friends,
especially from social media.
Add these together and it’s easy to see how we may be receiving more information than we can
take in. This state of imbalance is known as information overload. Experts note that information
overload is “A symptom of the high-tech age, which is too much information for one human being to
absorb in an expanding world of people and technology. It comes from all sources including TV,
newspapers, and magazines as well as wanted and unwanted regular mail, e-mail and faxes. It
has been exacerbated enormously because of the formidable number of results obtained from Web
search engines (PC Magazine, 2008).” Other research shows that working in such fragmented
fashion has a significant negative effect on efficiency, creativity, and mental acuity (Overholt, 2001).
Going back to our example of Bill. Let’s say he’s in his cubicle on the phone with a supplier. While
he’s talking, he hears the chime of e-mail alerting him to an important message from his boss. He’s
scanning through it quickly, while still on the phone, when a coworker pokes his head around the
cubicle corner to remind Bill that he’s late for a staff meeting. The supplier on the other end of the
phone line has just given Bill a choice among the products and delivery dates he requested. Bill
realizes he missed hearing the first two options, but he doesn’t have time to ask the supplier to
repeat them all or to try reconnecting to place the order at a later time. He chooses the third option
—at least he heard that one, he reasons, and it seemed fair. How good was Bill’s decision amid all
the information he was processing at the same time?
Emotional disconnects
Emotional disconnects happen when the Sender or the Receiver is upset, whether about the
subject at hand or about some unrelated incident that may have happened earlier. An effective
communication requires a Sender and a Receiver who are open to speaking and listening to one
another, despite possible differences in opinion or personality. One or both parties may have to put
their emotions aside to achieve the goal of communicating clearly. A Receiver who is emotionally
upset tends to ignore or distort what the Sender is saying. A Sender who is emotionally upset may
be unable to present ideas or feelings effectively.
Lack of Source Credibility
Lack of source familiarity or credibility can derail communications, especially when humor is
involved. Have you ever told a joke that fell flat? You and the Receiver lacked the common context
that could have made it funny. (Or yes, it could have just been a lousy joke.) Sarcasm and irony are
subtle, and potentially hurtful, commodities in business. It’s best to keep these types of
communications out of the workplace as their benefits are limited, and their potential dangers are
great. Lack of familiarity with the Sender can lead to misinterpreting humor, especially in less-rich
information channels like e-mail. For example, an e-mail from Jill that ends with, “Men, like hens,
should boil in vats of oil,” could be interpreted as antimale if the Receiver didn’t know that Jill has a
penchant for rhyme and likes to entertain coworkers by making up amusing sayings.
Similarly, if the Sender lacks credibility or is untrustworthy, the Message will not get through.
Receivers may be suspicious of the Sender’s motivations (“Why am I being told this?”). Likewise, if
the Sender has communicated erroneous information in the past, or has created false
emergencies, his current Message may be filtered.
Workplace gossip
Workplace gossip, also known as the grapevine, is a lifeline for many employees seeking
information about their company (Kurland & Pelled, 2000). Researchers agree that the grapevine is
an inevitable part of organizational life. Research finds that 70% of all organizational
communication occurs at the grapevine level (Crampton, 1998).
Employees trust their peers as a source of Messages, but the grapevine’s informal structure can be
a barrier to effective communication from the managerial point of view. Its grassroots structure
gives it greater credibility in the minds of employees than information delivered through official
channels, even when that information is false.
Some downsides of the office grapevine are that gossip offers politically minded insiders a powerful
tool for disseminating communication (and self-promoting miscommunications) within an
organization. In addition, the grapevine lacks a specific Sender, which can create a sense of
distrust among employees—who is at the root of the gossip network? When the news is volatile,
suspicions may arise as to the person or persons behind the Message. Managers who understand
the grapevine’s power can use it to send and receive Messages of their own. They also decrease
the grapevine’s power by sending official Messages quickly and accurately, should big news arise.
Semantics
Semantics is the study of meaning in communication. Words can mean different things to different
people, or they might not mean anything to another person. For example, companies often have
their own acronyms and buzzwords (called business jargon) that are clear to them but
impenetrable to outsiders. For example, “IBM’s GBS is focusing on BPTS, using expertise acquired
from the PwC purchase (which had to be sold to avoid conflicts of interest in light of SOX) to fend
other BPO providers and inroads by the Bangalore tiger.” Does this make sense to you? If not,
here’s the translation: IBM’s Global Business Services (GBS) division is focusing on offering
companies Business Process Transformation Services (BPTS), using the expertise it acquired from
purchasing the management consulting and technology services arm of PricewaterhouseCoopers
(PwC), which had to sell the division because of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), enacted in
response to the major accounting scandals like the Enron). The added management expertise puts
it above business process outsourcing (BPO) vendors who focus more on automating processes
rather than transforming and improving them. Chief among these BPO competitors is Wipro, often
called the “Bangalore tiger” because of its geographic origin and aggressive growth.
Given the amount of Messages we send and receive every day, it makes sense that humans try to
find shortcuts—a way to communicate things in code. In business, this code is known as jargon.
Jargon is the language of specialized terms used by a group or profession. It is common shorthand
among experts and if used sensibly can be a quick and efficient way of communicating. Most
jargon consists of unfamiliar terms, abstract words, nonexistent words, acronyms, and
abbreviations, with an occasional euphemism thrown in for good measure. Every profession, trade,
and organization has its own specialized terms (Wright, 2008). At first glance, jargon seems like a
good thing—a quicker way to send an effective communication, the way text message
abbreviations can send common messages in a shorter, yet understandable way. But that’s not
always how things happen. Jargon can be an obstacle to effective communication, causing
listeners to tune out or fostering ill-feeling between partners in a conversation. When jargon rules
the day, the Message can get obscured.
A key question to ask before using jargon is, “Who is the Receiver of my Message?” If you are a
specialist speaking to another specialist in your area, jargon may be the best way to send a
message while forging a professional bond—similar to the way best friends can communicate in
code. For example, an information technology (IT) systems analyst communicating with another IT
employee may use jargon as a way of sharing information in a way that reinforces the pair’s shared
knowledge. But that same conversation should be held in standard English, free of jargon, when
communicating with staff members outside the IT group.
Gender Differences
Gender differences in communication have been documented by a number of experts, including
linguistics professor Deborah Tannen in her best-selling book You Just Don’t Understand: Women
and Men in Conversation (Tannen, 1991). Men and women work together every day. But their
different styles of communication can sometimes work against them. Generally speaking, women
like to ask questions before starting a project, while men tend to “jump right in.” A male manager
who’s unaware of how many women communicate their readiness to work may misperceive a
ready employee as not ready.
Another difference that has been noticed is that men often speak in sports metaphors, while many
women use their home as a starting place for analogies. Women who believe men are “only talking
about the game” may be missing out on a chance to participate in a division’s strategy and
opportunities for teamwork and “rallying the troops” for success (Krotz, 2008).
“It is important to promote the best possible communication between men and women in the
workplace,” notes gender policy adviser Dee Norton, who provided the above example. “As we
move between the male and female cultures, we sometimes have to change how we behave
(speak the language of the other gender) to gain the best results from the situation. Clearly,
successful organizations of the future are going to have leaders and team members who
understand, respect and apply the rules of gender culture appropriately (Norton, 2008).”
Being aware of these gender differences can be the first step in learning to work with them, as
opposed to around them. For example, keep in mind that men tend to focus more on competition,
data, and orders in their communications, while women tend to focus more on cooperation,
intuition, and requests. Both styles can be effective in the right situations, but understanding the
differences is a first step in avoiding misunderstandings based on them.
Differences in meaning often exist between the Sender and Receiver. “Mean what you say, and
say what you mean.” It’s an easy thing to say. But in business, what do those words mean?
Different words mean different things to different people. Age, education, and cultural background
are all factors that influence how a person interprets words. The less we consider our audience, the
greater our chances of miscommunication will be. When communication occurs in the cross-
cultural context, extra caution is needed given that different words will be interpreted differently
across cultures and different cultures have different norms regarding nonverbal communication.
Eliminating jargon is one way of ensuring that our words will convey real-world concepts to others.
Speaking to our audience, as opposed to about ourselves, is another. Nonverbal Messages can
also have different meanings.
Managers who speak about “long-term goals and profits” to a staff that has received scant raises
may find their core Message (“You’re doing a great job—and that benefits the folks in charge!”) has
infuriated the group they hoped to inspire. Instead, managers who recognize the “contributions” of
their staff and confirm that this work is contributing to company goals in ways “that will benefit the
source of our success—our employees as well as executives,” will find their core Message (“You’re
doing a great job—we really value your work”) is received as opposed to being misinterpreted.
Biased language can offend or stereotype others on the basis of their personal or group affiliation.
The figure below provides a list of words that have the potential to be offensive in the left-hand
column. The right-hand column provides more neutral words that you can use instead (Ashcraft &
Mumby, 2003; Swift, 2007).
Herzberg’s research has received its share of criticism (Cummings & Elsalmi, 1968; House &
Wigdor, 1967). One criticism relates to the classification of the factors as hygiene or motivator.
For example, pay is viewed as a hygiene factor. However, pay is not necessarily a contextual
factor and may have symbolic value by showing employees that they are being recognized for
their contributions as well as communicating to them that they are advancing within the
company. Similarly, quality of supervision or relationships employees form with their
supervisors may determine whether they are assigned interesting work, whether they are
recognized for their potential, and whether they take on more responsibilities. Despite its
limitations, the two-factor theory can be a valuable aid to managers because it points out that
improving the environment in which the job is performed goes only so far in motivating
employees.
Acquired Needs Theory
Among the need-based approaches to motivation, Douglas McClelland’s acquired needs
theory is the one that has received the greatest amount of support. According to this theory,
individuals acquire three types of needs as a result of their life experiences. These needs are
need for achievement, need for affiliation, and need for power. All individuals possess a
combination of these needs.
Those who have high need for achievement have a strong need to be successful. A worker
who derives great satisfaction from meeting deadlines, coming up with brilliant ideas, and
planning his or her next career move may be high in need for achievement. Individuals high on
need for achievement are well suited to positions such as sales where there are explicit goals,
feedback is immediately available, and their effort often leads to success (Harrell & Stahl,
1981; Trevis & Certo, 2005; Turban & Keon, 1993). Because of their success in lower-level
jobs, those in high need for achievement are often promoted to higher-level positions
(McClelland & Boyatzis, 1982).
However, a high need for achievement has important disadvantages in management.
Management involves getting work done by motivating others. When a salesperson is
promoted to be a sales manager, the job description changes from actively selling to recruiting,
motivating, and training salespeople. Those who are high in need for achievement may view
managerial activities such as coaching, communicating, and meeting with subordinates as a
waste of time.
Moreover, they enjoy doing things themselves and may find it difficult to delegate authority.
They may become overbearing or micromanaging bosses, expecting everyone to be as
dedicated to work as they are, and expecting subordinates to do things exactly the way they
are used to doing (McClelland & Burnham, 1976).
Individuals who have a high need for affiliation want to be liked and accepted by others. When
given a choice, they prefer to interact with others and be with friends (Wong &
Csikszentmihalyi, 1991). Their emphasis on harmonious interpersonal relationships may be an
advantage in jobs and occupations requiring frequent interpersonal interaction, such as social
worker or teacher. In managerial positions, a high need for affiliation may again serve as a
disadvantage because these individuals tend to be overly concerned about how they are
perceived by others. Thus, they may find it difficult to perform some aspects of a manager’s job
such as giving employees critical feedback or disciplining poor performers.
Finally, those with high need for power want to influence others and control their environment.
Need for power may be destructive of one’s relationships if it takes the form of seeking and
using power for one’s own good and prestige. However, when it manifests itself in more
altruistic forms, such as changing the way things are done so that the work environment is
more positive or negotiating more resources for one’s department, it tends to lead to positive
outcomes. In fact, need for power is viewed as important for effectiveness in managerial and
leadership positions (Mcclelland & Burnham, 1976; Spangler & House, 1991; Spreier, 2006).
McClelland’s theory of acquired needs has important implications for motivating employees.
While someone who has high need for achievement may respond to goals, those with high
need for affiliation may be motivated to gain the approval of their peers and supervisors,
whereas those who have high need for power may value gaining influence over the supervisor
or acquiring a position that has decision-making authority. And, when it comes to succeeding in
managerial positions, individuals who are aware of the drawbacks of their need orientation can
take steps to overcome these drawbacks.
Process-based theories of motivation
In contrast to the need-based theories we have covered so far, process-based theories view
motivation as a rational process. Individuals analyze their environment, develop reactions and
feelings, and react in certain ways. Under this category, we will review equity theory,
expectancy theory, and reinforcement theory. We will also discuss the concepts of job design
and goal setting as motivational strategies.
NAME:ANNE WANJIRU MWANGI
ADM:BCOM/2017/76932
CAT 1
1.DISCUSS IN DETAIL THE FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY OF TGE FOLLOWING
COMMITEES
Procurement. (2mks)
The function of procurement committee is to review an organization's procurement
policies and practices and to ensure that these are in line with relevant laws as well
as recognized good practices.
Evaluation Committee. (2mks)
The role of this committee is to evaluate bids in accordance with the specifications
as set out in the original tender document and to conduct such an evaluation under
a point system as stipulated in the Supply Chain Management Policy of the organ
of state.
Inspection and Acceptance Committee. (3mks)
They are responsible for
Inspecting and where necessary test the goods received. Inspect and review the
goods works or services in order to ensure compliance with the terms and
specification of the contract.
Accept or reject on behalf of the procuring entity the delivered good works and
services.
Ensure that correct quantities are received
Ensure that the good, works and services have been delivered or completed on
time or that any delay has been noted.
Ensure that all the required manuals or documented have been received. Issue
interim or completion certificates or good received notes as appropriate and in
accordance with the contract.
2.Discuss challenges of public procurement system in Kenya(10 Marks)
Inadequate qualified procurement professionals
The audit reports repeatedly point to the lack of adequate procurement
professionals, hence the procurement challenges in Kenya. According to the
Controller of Budget’s report 2013/2014, low levels of staff capacity,
especially in public procurement and financial management, affected budget
implementation, resulting in low absorption of funds. Lack of capacity in
terms of knowledge of The Public Procurement and Disposal Act 2005, by
some procurement professionals, is also contributing significantly to the
inadequate fulfillment of procurement requirements.
Inadequate procurement planning
It is a requirement under the Public Procurement and Disposal Act, 2005 to
prepare a procurement plan by the beginning of the financial year and
monitor its implementation to ensure adherence to it. According to the
Auditor-General’s report, most counties have had , unplanned spending,
which is evident in the three examples studied. This unplanned spending
may indicate the total lack of procurement plans, or the ineffective use of
existing procurement plans in anticipating all the activities to be undertaken.
There were also over-estimations of costs in some instances, which
compromise the value for money principle.
Lack of pre-qualification of suppliers
The case studies evidently point to the lack of pre-qualification of suppliers,
hence the numerous cases of single sourcing. As indicated in the Controller of
Budget’s report, single sourcing could also be rampant due to the interference of
the Executive in procurement matters, through instructions that undermine the
principle of competition. These executive interferences are likely to increase the
risk of corruption, particularly if government officials involved in the
procurement process are the ones receiving the tenders under the guise of
someone else; or if they are colluding with service providers to gain from the
tenders in exchange for elimination of competition and to ensure particular
service provider subsequently wins the tender.
. Political interference
Common corrupt practices in public procurement thus included public officers –
often under the influence of powerful politicians and businessmen only inviting
preferred firms, favoring certain firms at the short-listing stage, designing tender
documents to favor particular firms and releasing confidential information. This
state of affairs are worsened by the fact that the procurement system is manned by
junior officers, who are therefore powerless to correct any anomalies and could
easily be manipulated by their seniors and powerful politicians.
Conflict of interest
5. Change review and approval process. Describe how changes are made to
procurement documents to ensure the changes are valid, understood and
approved by the appropriate people.
6. Vendor processes. Describe the processes that the vendors should use for
timesheet approval, invoice processing, contract renegotiation, status
reporting, scope change requests.
REFERENCE.
Bauld, S & McGuinness K. (2006). Value for money. Summit, 9 (1), 20-21.
Institute for Development Studies [IDS]. (2006). Corruption, Firm Growth and
Export Propensityin Kenya.
Institute Of Economic Affairs [IEA], (2005). The Budget Focus: State of the
Nation and Challengesfor Budget 2005/06. Issue No. 11.
KPMG International. (2008). Governance Survey. Nairobi: KPMG