Public Speaking Choice and

Responsibility Explore Our New

Communications 1st Editions William
Keith
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmeta.com/product/public-speaking-choice-and-responsibility-explore-our
-new-communications-1st-editions-william-keith/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

Public Speaking: Choices and Responsibility 4th Edition

William Keith

https://ebookmeta.com/product/public-speaking-choices-and-
responsibility-4th-edition-william-keith/

Our Purpose in Speaking 1st Edition William Orem

https://ebookmeta.com/product/our-purpose-in-speaking-1st-
edition-william-orem/

Professional Writing and Speaking 5th Edition William

H. Baker

https://ebookmeta.com/product/professional-writing-and-
speaking-5th-edition-william-h-baker/

Human Rights and Public Goods: The Global New Deal 3rd
Edition William F. Felice

https://ebookmeta.com/product/human-rights-and-public-goods-the-
global-new-deal-3rd-edition-william-f-felice/
Economics: Private & Public Choice 17th Edition James
D. Gwartney

https://ebookmeta.com/product/economics-private-public-
choice-17th-edition-james-d-gwartney/

Macroeconomics: Private & Public Choice 17th Edition

James D. Gwartney

https://ebookmeta.com/product/macroeconomics-private-public-
choice-17th-edition-james-d-gwartney/

Public Relations Activism and Social Change Speaking Up

1st Edition Kristin Demetrious

https://ebookmeta.com/product/public-relations-activism-and-
social-change-speaking-up-1st-edition-kristin-demetrious/

Fighting Corruption in African Contexts Our Collective

Responsibility 1st Edition Chris Jones

https://ebookmeta.com/product/fighting-corruption-in-african-
contexts-our-collective-responsibility-1st-edition-chris-jones/

SELL YOUR RESEARCH Public Speaking for Scientists

Alexia Youknovsky

https://ebookmeta.com/product/sell-your-research-public-speaking-
for-scientists-alexia-youknovsky/
PUBL PEAKN
CHOICES AND RESPONSIBILITY

WILLIAM KEITH· CHRISTIAN 0. LUNDBERG

-�
#CourseMate
Engaging. Trackable. Affordable. Practice and Present with Speech
"'
Studio 2.0 !
Complement your text and course content with
study and practice materials. Speech Studio 2.0 is an online program that enables students to
upload recorded speeches which instructors and peers can view ar.d
Cengage Learning's CourseMate brings course concepts to life
assess. Speech Studio 2.0 includes enhancements such as easv
with interactive learning, study, and exam preparation tools that
adding, deleting, and resetting of assignments; uploading adcfrtic�
support the printed textbook. Watch student comprehension soar as
assignment elements like outline and PowerPoint® slides; grac1rs •,1th
your class works with the printed textbook and the textbook-specific
weighted rubric criteria; enhanced peer review functionality; ar,:; ;
website. CourseMate goes beyond the book to deliver what
rubric editor.
you need! '
With Speech Studio 2.0 you can
CourseMate includes
• Upload speech videos in multiple file formats for a variet
• An interactive eBook with highlighting, note taking, and an
of speech assignments, including introductory, informati·:­
interactive glossary.
persuasive, invitational, ceremonial, and group presenta,;1...
• Engagement Tracker, a first-of-its-kind tool that monitors • Grade speech videos with the help of grading rubrics ana ,
student engagement in the course.
library of "Quick Comments".
• Dynamic learning tools, including animations to help students • Conduct peer review in a virtual environment.
visualize and review course concepts.
• Create an original course or use a master course templatR.
• Quizzes, videos, flashcards, and more!

Learn more & view a demo at: For more information: �

www.cengage.com/coursemate Contact your Cengage Learning representative
ICHOICES AND RESPONSIBILITY
: # WADSWORTH
t • CENGAGE Learning-
Publlc Speaking: Choices and Responslblllty
Wllflam Keith, Christian 0. Lundberg
Editor-In-Chief: Lyn Uhl
Publlsher: Monica Eckman
Development Editor: Elisa Adams
Editorial Assistant: Colin Solan
Media Editor: Jessica Badlner
Market Development Manager: Linda Yip
Content Project Manager: Dan Saabye
Art Director: Linda May
Manufacturing Planner: Doug Bertke
Rights Acquisition Specialist Alex Ricciardi
Production Service: MPS Limited
Text Designer: Diane Beasley
Cover Designer. Riezebos Holzbaur Group
Cover Image: Diana Ong/SuperStock/©Getty
Images
Compositor: MPS Limited
Printed in China
2 3 4 5 6 7 16 15 14 13
0 2014, Wadsworth, Cengage Learning
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright herein
may be reproduced, transmitted, stored, or used in any form or by any means
graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including but not limited to photocopying.
recording, scanning, digitizing, taping , Web distribution, inf ormation networlcs,
or Information storage and retrieval systems, except as permitted under
Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior
written permission of the publisher.
For product information and technology assistance, contact us at
Cengage Learning Customer & Sales Support, 1-800-354-9706
For permission to use material from this text or product,
submit all requests online at www.cengage.com/permissions
Further permissions questions can be emailed to
permissionrequ�ngage.com
Library of Congress Control Number: 2012952971
Student Edition:
ISBN-13: 978-0-495-56986-2
ISBN-10: 0-495-56986-0
Wadsworth
20 Channel Center Street
Boston, MA 02210
USA
Cengage Learning is a leading provider of customized learning solutions with
office locations around the globe, including Singapore, the United Kingdom,
Australia, Mexico, Brazil, and Japan. Locate your local office at
international.cengage.com/region
Cengage Learning products are represented in Canada by Nelson Education, Ltd.
For your course and learning solutions, visit www.cengage.com
Purchase any of our products at your local college store or at our preferred
online store www.cengagebrain.com
Instructors: Please visit login.cengage.com and log in to access instructor­
specific resources.
 Contents
(;�1 �
l✓\f ,\ 1 :i (c, J..,

P1"i fac xi

Public Speaking 3
Introduction: Why L am Public Speaking? 4 Your Goals (Chapter 5) 18
h ls Powerful 4 Creating Your First
Th Power of Public Speaking to Change the World 5 Speech 19
Th Power of Speeches to Change Your World 5 Information and Arguments
peaking Connects You to Others: Democracy (Chapters 6, 7) 19
In Everyday Life 6 Research (Chapter 8) 20
The Conversational Framework 7 Organizing (Chapter 9) 20
The Communication Process 9 Finding the Words (Chapter 10) 21

The Public in Public Speaking 10 Giving Your First Speech 22

Delivering the Speech (Chapter 11) 22
Speaking Is About Making Choices 12 Overcoming Anxiety (Chapter 11) 23
Preparation 12 Presentation Aids (Chapter 12) 23
Informing 14
Persuading 14 Making Responsible Choices 24
Good Speeches Are the Result of Choices 24
The Speaking Process: Thinking, Creating, Taking Responsibility Means Respecting the Audience 24
and Speaking 16
Thinking Through Your Choices 17
Your Responsibilities (Chapter 2) 17
Your Audience (Chapters 3, 4) 17

Ethics and the Responsible Speaker 27

Introduction: Why Ethics Matter in Public Speaking 28 How to Create an Ethical
Ethical Pitfalls in Public Speaking 29 Speech 39
Deceptive Speech 29 Respect Your Audience 39
Inappropriately Biased Speech 31 Respect Your Topic 40
Poorly Reasoned Speech 32 Present Other Views and
Treat Them Fairly 42
Seven Principles of Ethical Public Speaking 32
BeHonest 33 Avoid Fallacies and Prejudicial Appeals 43
BeOpen 33 Name Calling 43
Be Generous 34 Glittering Generalities 43
Be Balanced 34 Inappropriate Testimonials 44
Represent Evidence Responsibly 35 Plain-Folks Appeals 44
Take Appropriate Risks 36 Card Stacking 44
Choose Engagement 36 Bandwagoning 45

How to Avoid Plagiarism 37

•
2

r
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
Understanding Audiences and Publics 47
Introduction: Those People Sitting in Fro nt of You 4 8 Two Views of the Audience:
Audience Analysis 49 Marketing vs.
The Literal Audience: Demographics 49 Engagement 55
Problems With the Demographic Approach 51 Marketing 55
Engagement 56
The Rhetorical Audience 51
The "As" Test 52 The Audience and the
From "Me" to "Us" 54 Public 58
Advancing the Public Conversation 59
Adapting Your Speech to Your Audience 54
Identify Common Interests 54 Your Responsibilities to Your Audience 60
Make the Most of Shared Experience 55
Work from Common Premises 55
Be Directive 55

.... .......................................................................................
Becoming a Skilled Listener 65
Introduction: Public Hearing and Listening 66 Giving Constructive and
Types of Listening 66 Useful Feedback 77
Passive Listening 66 Criticize Speeches, Not
Active Listening 67 People 79
Critical Listening 68 Be Specific 79
Focus on What Can Be
The Ethics of Listening 69 Changed 79
Obstacles to Good Listening 71 Be Communication Sensitive 80
Distractions 72
Your Mental Zone 73
Taking Good Notes 74

...........................................................................................
Choosing a Topic and Purpose 85
Introduction: Picking a Topic How to Focus Your Topic
and Defining Your Purpose 86 for Your Audience 93
Geography or Location 93
A Strategy for Picking a Topic 86
Past, Present, or Future 94
What Interests You? 88
Typical Audience
What Will Interest Your Audience? 88
Interests 94
What Is the Occasion? 88
What Is Your Purpose? 89 Speaking Purposes and Speaking Situations 95
What Is Your Thesis? 89 General Purposes of Speeches 95
Types of Speaking Situations 95
How to Find a Topic Among Your Interests 90
Time Constraints 98
What Do You Already Know or Care About? 90
What Do You Want to Know More About? 91 The Thesis Statement: Putting Your
Brainstorming 91 Purpose Into Words 98
Choosing One of Your Topic Ideas 92

• CONTENTS
 ······················-· · · · · ······· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··· · · · · · · · · · · ··· · ··· · · · · · · · ···· · · • · " '
Informative Speaking 103
Introduction: T lling It Like It Is l04 Technlqut'S of rnformatlvP
Goals of Informative peaking l05 Spt:'nl<lng 11r,
P1 ent New Information lOti Deflnlnl( I In
Provide Ne, Perspectives 107 D�s rlhln� 11.l'i
Generate Positive 01· N gntlVl' l�eellngs 108 Explaining 117
How to Choose nn Int'ormnt.lve Gonl 100 hole s 'fhat Make
The Responsibilities of the Informative Speaker 110 Information Effective 119
Keep It Simple 119
Topics for Informative Speech s 112 Connect Your Topic to Your Audience l lf.J
Objects and Events 112 Use Supporting Material Wisely 120
People 113
Choose Effective Organizational Patt rns 120
Processes 113
Choose Effective Language 121
Ideas 114

...........................................................................................
Being Persuasive 125
Introduction: Giving the Audience Proofs 126 Formal Arguments
(Deductive
Ethos: Why Audiences Should Believe You 128 Reasoning) 139
Classical Dimensions of Ethos 130
Causal Arguments 140
Why Are You Speaking on This Topic? 130
Arguments From
Pathos: The Framework of Feelings 131 Analogy 141
Appeals to Positive Emotions 132 Arguments From Signs 142
Fear and Other Negative Appeals 133 Arguments From Authority 143
Framing 134
What About the Other Side? Dealing
Logos: Who Needs an Argument? 135 with Counterarguments 144
Making Connections: The Process of Reasoning 138 Why Addressing Counterarguments Is Persuasive 144
Tips for Dealing With Counterarguments 144
Types of Arguments 138
Arguments From Examples (Inductive Reasoning) 138

......................................... ..................................................
Research 149
Introduction: Becoming an Expert 150 Biogs 163
News Articles 164
Researching Responsibly 151
Opinion or Advocacy
The Research Process 152 Pieces 164
Figuring Out What You Already Know 153 Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed
Designing a Research Strategy 154 Articles 165
Deciding Where to Go 155 Wilds 165
Making a Methodical Search 158 Websites and Web Pages 165
How to Conduct an Online Search 158 Revising Your Claims 166
Creating Search Terms 158
Focusing Your Search 159 Organizing Your Research Information 166
Gathering Your Materials 160 Choosing the Sources for Your Speech 167
Reading Your Materials and Taking Notes 161 Citing Your Sources and Avoiding Plagiarism 168
Evaluating Sources 163 Getting Help From a Research Expert 169

CONTENTS •
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Organization 173
Introduction: Getting Organiz d 174 Patterns of
ThP Basic Three-Parl Structure 174 Organization 184
Chronological 184
The lntroduct ion 176 Spatial 186
Fu net Ions of an Efft'ctlvc I nlroducl.lon 176 Cause and Effect 186
Ell•ml'nts oftlw Introduction 176
Problem-Solution 188
The Body 179 Topical 188
Functions of the Dody 180 Combination 190
Point 180 Choosing the Order of Points: Prima.c.-y vs. P.ect:n,~1 l/.,
Transitions 180
Arranging Your Supporting Materials 192
Internal Previews 181
Outlining 193
The Conclusion 183
Outline Structure 193
Functions of the Conclusion 183
Preparation and Delivery Outlines 194
Elements of the Conclusion 183

.. ......................... ...................................... .........................

Verbal Style 197
Introduction: What Is Style, and Why Tropes 207
Does It Matter? 198 Tropes of Comparison:
Characteristics of Effective Style 198 Metaphor and Simile 207
Concrete and Lively Language 199 The Trope of Substitution:
Respectful Language 199 Metonymy 209
Tropes of Exaggeration:
Classifying Verbal Style: Figures and Tropes 201 Overstatement
Figures 201 and Understatement 210
Figures of Repetition 201 The Trope of Voice: Personification 211
Figures of Contrast 204 Matching the Style to the Topic and the Occasion

...........................................................................................
Delivery 215
Introduction: Stand and Deliver 216 Walking 229
Speaking or Talking? 217 Using Gestures 230

Creating Focus and Energy From Your Anxiety 218 Communicating

Credibility 230
Types of Preparation and Delivery 220 Making Eye Contact 231
Speaking From Memory 220 Choosing Your
Speaking From Manuscript 220 Appearance 232
Extemporaneous Speaking 221
Impromptu Speaking 221 How to Practice Delivering Your Speech 232
Staying on Time 222 Practice, All the Way Through, at Least Four Times n:.
Practice in Front of an Audience 233
Types of Speaking Aids 223 Practice Making Mistakes 233
Using Your Voice Effectively 224 Breathe, Breathe, Breathe 234
Volume 224 Answering Questions from the Audience 234
Speed 226 Anticipating Questions 235
Articulation 226 Interpreting the Questions 235
Inflection 227 Giving Your Answers 235
Using Your Body Effectively 228
Standing 228

• CONTENTS
 ............................................. ..... .. ..................................... ..
Presentation Aids 239
Introduction: Adding Media to Your Message 240 Non-Electronic Media 253
Why Use Presentation Aids? 241 Handouts 253
Posters and l<'lip Charts 254
Principles for Integrating Presentation Aids 241 Objects 254
Static Visual Elements 246 Demonstration Speeches
Pictures and Photos 245 and Presentation
Charts and Graphs 247
Aids 266
Maps and Diagrams 251
Text 252 Presentation Software 256
Moving Images 262 Delivering Your Speech With Presentation Aids 259
Preparing to Use Digital Media 260
Audio 253
Developing a Backup Plan for Digital Media 260

··························································································
Special Types of Speeches
and Presentations 263
Adapting Your Skills to New Challenges 264 Group Presentations 277
Speeches at Life Transitions 264 Cooperation 277
Toasts 266 Coordination 279
Eulogy 268 Delivering the Group
Graduation 270 Presentation 280
Rehearsing the Group
Speeches at Ceremonies 272 Presentation 280
Introducing a Speaker 272
After-Dinner Speaking 274
Presenting an Award 275

Appendix: Selected Speeches 282

Statement to the Iowa House Judiciary Committee by
Zach Wahls 282
Rated "D" for Deficiency: The Sunshine Vitamin by
Nicole Platzar 284
Speech at Kensington Town Hall ("Britain Awake")
(The Iron Lady) 287
Statement on Behalf of the African National
Congress, on the Occasion of the Adoption by the
Constitutional Assembly of the Republic of South
Africa Constitution Bill 1996 by Deputy President
Thabo Mbeki 294
The Perils of Indifference by Elie Wiesel 298

Endnotes 301
Index 304

CONTENTS •
----·
Preface

Those of us who teach public speaking know that the abilicy to engage an audi­
ence with skill, elegance, and clarity can make a decisive impact in the lives of students.
The difference between success and failure in a student's academic work, personal re­
lationships, and vocational path can often turn on the ability to create ethical and effec­
tive speech. Although future personal success is one important reason a student should
cultivate skill in public speech, it is not the only reason. In an increasingly globalizing
and information-saturated world, educating more engaged, informed, and responsible
public speakers may well be one of the last and best hopes for our civic and democratic
life together. In an era of hyperpartisan politics and creeping disillusionment with pub­
lic discourse and the political system, our best recourse may be turning to the ancient
arts of rhetoric and public speaking. These arts can teach us, once again, how to really
listen to, respond to, and respectfully engage with our fellow citizens. Thus, this book
seeks to remake an art with ancient roots for modem times, or, to put it in more con­
temporary terms, to remix an ancient beat for the information era
We wrote PUBLIC SPEAKING: Choices and Responsibility because we be­
lieve firmly that public speaking matters profoundly to our personal and collective
futures. We hope this text embodies a vision of public speaking that is accessible,
easy to engage, and relevant to our students without sacrificing the most important
lessons the tradition of public speaking has to teach us. While many approaches to
public speaking present a catalogue of tips and techniques for giving a speech, we
have attempted to create a simple framework for helping students learn to be better
public speakers.
This framework is easy to understand and teach, and better yet, it pays homage to
the best insight of the traditions of public speaking, which is that addressing any au­
dience is about making choices and taking responsibility. For us, "making choices"
means seeing every public speech as a collection of decisions that starts with invent­
ing a topic, moves through effective research, organization, and delivery, and ends
with successful interaction with an audience. "Taking responsibility" means owning
your choices, both by making them very intentionally and by accepting the obligation
to be responsive to the audience.
In making these two concepts the core of the book, we believe we have provided
a set of guiding principles that ties many of the best insights of public speaking peda­
gogy together around a central theme and that satisfies the demands of the current
generation of students for broader civic and social engagement. The style of the book
also reflects our concern not only to engage students but also to inspire them to use
their voices to make a difference in their communities, future workplaces, and the
broader public sphere. Many of our examples are directly relevant to student's every­
day lives; others are drawn from issues that occupy the front pages of newspapers,
websites, and social media sources. In both cases, our goal is to provide students with
examples that are relevant and engaging and that demonstrate the importance of pub­
lic speaking to the broader health of civic life.
To create a text that is intuitive, easy to teach and learn from, and engaging to
students, we have placed special emphasis on significant themes. In the introductory
chapter we emphasize the world-changing power of public speech, and we introduce
 st11de nts t.o our cen t ral con cepts of making choices and taking responsibilit
y \,
them. Our goal here is to "pu t the public back in public peaking" �Y introd cing �
� � ,�
den ts to the idea that every speech bot h targets a specific strategic goal (mfonni
ni
or persua ding an audience, for exa mple) and si multaneously fonns a pa rt of the lar
er public conversation around issues important to each of us. In addition, studrn ;
need to unde rstand that this is also the best approach to speaking in professional a �
n
business contexts. Speeches here need to be well argu ed and researched and cleari
organized, just like those in the civic context. If a "pu blic" is a group of people wii�
a common set of concerns, then there are publics bot� intern� and ext ernal to an
\
business or organization. The basic skills of good choice-making can be applied 1,,
nearly any context.
To help get students up and speaking, and more importantly, to give them a ba�ir
understanding of the choices that go into an effective public speech, in Chapter
1
we provide a brief, early overview of the process of creating and delivering a PUhlir·
speech. Perhaps most significantly for many first-time speakers, this chapte r tackJf'\
the issue of speech anxiety head on, offering effective introductory advice for dealin�
with public-speaking jitters.
Because this book is so centrally concerned with the idea of responsible speak.
ing in personal, work, and public contexts, Chapter 2 on ethics is the first subs tantive
chapter of the book. We believe our approach to ethics will resonate with contempo.
rary students because instead of simply producing a list of dos and don'ts, we have
provided a set of principles for thinking about ethical public speaking practice as an
intrinsic element of every communicative interaction. The chapter treats all the stan.
<lard topics in an ethics chapter-including properly citing sources, accurately rt0pre­
senting evidence, avoiding deception and prejudicial appeals--but it does so L the
broader context of encouraging students to think about the health and quality the
relationship they are establishing with their audience.
To be ethically sound and strategically effective, good public speaking sho1. ·,e­
gin and end with thinking about the audience. In Chapter 3 we discuss how th ng
about the audience influences the choices speakers make and the ways they :hr
take responsibility for the audience in composing and delivering speeches. Not c io
we talk about skills at the core of good public speaking in this chapter-for ex, le.
analyzing and adapting to your audience-but we emphasize thinking about uc
speaking as an opportunity for engaging the audience in a conversation around ies
of personal and public concern. Our goals in this chapter are to take advantage 1he
current sentiment among students, promoted in colleges and universities, for g irer
public and civic engagement and to demonstrate to students that in addressing ,pe­
ci.fic audience, they are also making their views known in the context of a br !der
public conversation.
For the model of public speaking as a part of a broader public conversat ·1 to
work, we believe a public speaking text should present more than just the bes1 ays
to speak to an audience. Thus, Chapter 4 addresses how we should listen. One ,1ur
goals is to help students be better audience members and more responsive spl ,ers
by emphasizing the role of active, critical, and ethically sound listening. We in •1de
detailed advice on eliminating impediments to good listening, taking good note::-. and
giving constructive feedback. But perhaps more importantly, we believe that pri'- tlt>g­
ing listening in the public speaking classroom is a pivotal first step toward i.rnpro1·­
ing the quality of public conversation in that it emphasizes paying attention to Llw
claims of others as a necessary part of participating in a robust and respectf ul public
conversation.
In the subsequent three chapters, we move from a basic framework for rnak·
ing choices and taking responsibility in public speech toward a practically orient·
ed treatment of how to make effective choices in selecting a topic and purpose

• PREFACE
(Chapter 5), ghing an infom1ati e speech (Chapter 6), and giving a persuasive
speech ( hapter 7). hapter provides students a pra tical rubric for making good
speech choices that be t balance their interests, lhcir goals for inlera lion with
the audience. and the nature of the public speaking situation. We provide easily
implementable solutions for picking a topic area, dellning a purpose, generating a
th · statement, and focu ing the speech in light of the occasion and character of
the audience.
Chap er 6 focuses on infonnati e speaking by beginning with thinking about how
our contemporary conte.xt and news media in particular have changed the way we
think about information. More than ever, the culture broadly, and our students specifi­
cally. haYe begun to think about the notion of "spin" in presenting information. Our
goal in this frame is to help students think about responsible choices for presenting
information in a \\'-ay that is clear, well organized, and useful for the audience. This
chapter returns to theme of topic selection to deal with l:he unique challenges of pick­
ing a good informative topic and then moves on to discuss techniques for informative
speaking and the set of choices a speaker might make to ensure that information is
helpful for the audience.
Chapter 7 updates from Aristotle's three modes of proof-logos, ethos, and pa­
thos, or rational argument:, the speaker's character, and emotional appeals-to give
concrete guidance to students in composing and delivering an effective speech.
Though our inspiration is ancient, we draw from contemporary examples to provide a
basic framework for thinking about how to best convince modern audiences through
appeals to reason, character, and emotion. This chapter places special emphasis on
processes of reasoning, not only to help students give better speeches, but also to help
them sharpen their critical thinking skills.
But public speaking is about more than simply using appeals to logic, character, or
emotion. It is also about teachlng students to make claims that are well supported by
evidence. A culture of search engines and social media have fundamentally changed
the way students relate to information, and any public speaking pedagogy worth its
salt needs t-0 take this sea change in information culture into account. Chapter 8 faces
head-on the unique challenges of researchlng in a digital world, providing students
with a detailed guide to navigating a research context substantially more challenging
than it even was a decade ago. Once again emphasizing the central role of making
choices and taking responsibility, our chapter on research provides a detailed, easy­
to-follow, step-by-step protocol for designing a research strategy. Because contempo­
rary students research primarily online, we start with a discussion of all the research
options available to them and provide concrete instructions for effectively searching
the Internet and other sources. Given changes in student research practices, we place
a heavy emphasis on methodical searching, including designing and keeping track
of search tenns, and on focusing research efforts amid the near-avalanche of online
sources from which students can choose. Because today's student often struggles with
what to use and how best to use it, we devote parts of the chapter to evaluating the
credibility of sources and to thinking critically about the role evidence plays in the
composition of a good speech.
Chapter 9 teaches students how best to integrate their claims, arguments, and
evidence in a lucid and compelling format that effectively engages an audience. Our
chapter on organization presents a rubric from thinking about introductions, sign­
posting, the body of a speech, and a good conclusion. But instead of simply offering a
catalogue of possible speech formats or deferring to the nature of the topic for invent­
ing an organizational pattern, we discuss organization as a choice that, like any other,
entails specific advantages and drawbacks. Thus, students should come away with a
set of resources for developing a capacity for critical thinking about organizational
choices.

PREFACE •
 Chapters 10 and 11 deal with verbal style and deli ver y, applyi ng the san1e h·
sic fr amewor k for m akin g choices and taking responsi bi lity tha� we h ave Wovr�.
throughou t the text. Chapter 10 addresses the best of the rhetoncal trnctition's rr'.1
flec tions on lively language use, borrowing fro m a wide range of contemporary an,
1
pop culture discourses to discuss effective choices for the use ?f �gures and trop!'\
including treatm ents of repetition , contrast, comparison, subs titution, exaggeratiri n
and personification. We conclude this chapte r by re flecting on the ways the speak.
er's topic and the occasion might se r ve as a guide to the style choices goo d speak�
t\
make . Chapter 11 extends this same line of thinking to choices to make in deliver.
ing a speech. To help students negotiate these choices, we discuss differ ent typ
e,,
of delivery-from mem ory, f rom a manuscript, extemporaneously , with the help or a
presentation aid, and so on. We conclude this chapter with sections on how best l.ri
practice and effectively handle audience interaction.
We follow physi cal delivery with a detailed and visuall y rich chapter that
applies the principles of choice and responsibility to the use of presentation aido.
Whether the student is using a static visual aid such as a chart, moving ima ge s, an
audio clip, or presentation softw are, we believe applying the basi c frame work or
choices and responsibility can provide important insights. Chapter 12 in cludes an
integrate d section on how to give a demonstration speech, which by its nature h as
a multimedia element. It concludes with a pragmatic, detailed discuss ion ahou1
integrating presentation software into a speech without leaning on it as a replace.
ment for good public-speaking practices. Here we discuss a number of messy �,ut
critically important practicalities that go into effective presentation softwan- ·,e.
including how to think about delivery with presentation software, how to r
tice with and use presentation software in the classroom, and how to deve 1 a
backup plan.
Chapter 13 concludes the text by focusing on other types of speeches and sr :1
occasions. Although a first course will appropriately focus on basic informatiH
persuasive speeches, with classmates as the main audience, students will enco­
many other speaking situations in the world, and these will present new corc ,.
nication challenges. We believe the skills to meet these challenges are exten�
of the skills already learned. Students can easily learn to give effective and ; ,·
pelling speeches at life transitions and ceremonial occasions, and at work in g ·.1p
presentations.
So, we believe we have produced a public speaking curriculum that is
• Comprehensive, but systematically organized around a coherent systen ,r
making good speech choices and taking responsibility for them
• Simple to learn and to teach, always returning to the themes of making chr ,,
and taking responsibility
• Rich in practical advice and concrete detail for composing and deliw •1g
speeches
• Focused on the biggest struggles and conceptual issues public speaking ,Pt·
dents face
• An effective "remix" of ancient arts for the modern world-faithful to the bl'SI
insights of the rhetorical tradition but responsive to the contemporary stuctr1H
in its use of examples, composition and delivery practices, and style
• A curriculu m that puts the civic and relationa l character of public speaking in
the foreground of choice making
We have included a number of instructional features we think advance these
goals. We have tried to compose a visually engaging book, with images that match
the diversity and vitality of contemporary public culture. Each chapter begins with

,:EFACt
a vigne"e that tit� th art\utl " rk of student t tJu, nt nt f tJu, h. ptt>r In to .
Ii rm and nd "itJ, re,iew and di · n qui: Hons, \\ E' ha al lndud«-d t, major
kind f interncth f-e-at\u in the lt>�"t t kffp tudt'nt e1\gn,;tetl Try ltl pt't' nt ru1
e tudent an d wllile wadit tlw t xt. I rovi ling m1 immediate pp rtu-
d n prn 'ti wiU1 the 1wepts in th tJu� Try
" up w rk, think-pail'-sh m rk
k-ature. Q uently sked hrume
fi nlin it ·
.Q. bo. anticl tud
vari u pro.ts f te..�, providing a brief in · · · king
ate uni ulum and toward m f tl1 bigg q ·
impli p
peaking.
ial resources for students iu1d ill b1.1ctors d igned to treamlin t ach­
ing and facllitat leamitlg romplete the teaming packag for P 1JLl SPEAK11 G:
1wi aud Responsibility.

Reso1u--ces for Stt1de11ts

PUBUC SPE,4KING features an outstanditlg array of supplements to assist in malting
this course as meaningful and effective as p0&5ible. Note: If you want. our students to
have acces5 to the online resources for PUBLJ, SPEA.KI. G please be sure to order
them for your course--if you do not order them your students will not have access to
them on the first day of class. These resources can be bundled with every new copy of
the text or ordered separately. Students whose instructors do not order these resources
as a package with the text may purchase then, or access them at cengagebrain
.com. Contact your local Wadsw01th, Cengage Learning sales representat'i:ve for
nwre detail.s.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ..
■ CourseMate
Cengage Learning's Speech Communication CourseMate for PUBLIC SPEAKING
brings course concepts to life with interactive learning, study, and exan1 prepara­
tion tools that support the printed textbook. Watch student comprehension soar
as your class works with the printed textbook and the textbook-specific website.
CourseMate includes an integrated eBook, student workbook, interactive teaclung
and learning tools including quizzes, :flashcards, Interactive Video Activities, Making
Choices Simulations and Engagement Tracker-a first-of-its-ldnd tool that monitors
student engagement in the course. VI.Sit www.cengage.com/coursemate to learn more
about CourseMate. Students can access (and purchase access if necessaiy) at www
.cengagebrain.COIIL

.............................................................................................
■ Interactive Video Activities
Interactive Video Activities give your students a chance to watch videos of real
speeches that correspond to the topics in PUBUC SPEAKING. Each speech activity
provides a video of the speech; a full transcript so that viewers can read along; the
speech outline-many in notecard, keyword and sentence form; evaluation questions
so that students are guided through their assessment; and a note-taking tool. While

PREFACE •
 it:'v in� C'RC'h dip, i-uct nts evaluat th e speec h or scenario by completing s hort ai
, <'r nmt 1T1ultiple
ho\ e qu stlons or by embedding notes into the video and sun �
ting th Irr ult� dir ctJ nii
y to th Ir Instructor.

Making holces Simul at ions help students identify the moments of choice 1,
preprutng a p h I an d guid th m in making ethical decisions based on their aIJ.
di n ru1d P aking goal . Th s simulations are built around key topic s and con.
pt in th book, fi•om hoosing a focus and theme to selecting source s and Visua
\
ttid and mo r .

Thi online video upload and grading program improves the learning comprehension
of yolU' public speaking students. With Speech Studio 2.0, students can uplo ad video
files of practice speeches or final performances, comment on their peers ' speeches.
and review their grades and instr uctor feedback . Instructors create courses ancl as­
�<1nments, comment on and grade student speeches with a library of commenr� and
grading rubrics, and allow peer review. Grades flow into a gradebook that allow, 'hem
to easily manage their course from within Speech Studio. Grades can also be c 011.
ed for use in lea.ming management systems. Speech Studio's flexibility lends it :· ro
use in traditional, hyblid, and online courses .

.............. ....... . ..... . .. . . . . .... . . .... . . ...... . .. . . ... .... . . .... . .... . . . . . . . . . .
■ Speech Builder Express 3.0™
This e..'<:clusive program guides students through every step of the speech-b 1 .1 g
process. Nine sin1ple steps provide a series of critical-thinking questions that de
students to effective speech delivery. Links to video clips and an online dict1 .try
and thesaurus help students pull all aspects of their speeches together. Tutoria rip
is included for every aspect of the speech building process. Any portion of the 01 .111e
can be e-mailed to the instructor.
• Speecl1 Communication CourseMate (with eBook, Speech Builder Expn , ".
and InfoTrac®) for PUBLIC SPEAKING Printed Access Code: 97812850. _;!
• Speecl1 Communication CourseMate (with eBook, Speech Builder Exprf 11
and InfoTrac®) for PUBLIC SPEAKING Instant Access Code: 97812850� .�l1
• Speech Communication CourseMate (with SpeechStudio 2.0, eBook, S1 ·,·h
Builder ExpressTM , and InfoTrac®) for PUBLIC SPEAKING Printed A t ,,�s
Code:9781285O7234O
• Speech Communication CourseMate (with SpeechStudio 2.0, eBook, Sp,'1',·h
Builder ExpressTM , and InfoTrac®) for PUBLIC SPEAKING Instant Acct'ss
Code:9781285O72357

............ ... ..................................................................... ..

■ WebTutor
The WebTutorTM for WebCT® and Blackboard® provides access to all of the content
of this text's rich ComseMate and eBook from within a professor's course 1muiagt>·
ment system. CourseMate is ready to use as soon as you log on and offers a wide ,u-raY

PREFACE
of \\ b quizze , a tivitie , erci e , and \, eb links. Robust communication tools-
u h as a com e calendar, asynchronous discu ion. real-time chat a whlteboard, and
an int grated email t m-make it easy to stay connected to the course.
• In tant ode for WebTutor with eBook for WebCT® 9781285072012
• In tant ode for \\ebTutor with eBook for BlackBoard® 9781285071992
• Print ct ard for WebTutor with eBook fo r WebCT® 9781285072326
• Printed ard for\ ebTutor with eBook for BlackBoard® 9781285072296

lnfoTrac ollege EditionTM, This vutual library's more than 18 million reliable, full­
I ngth ruticles from 5,000 academic and popular periodicals allow students to retrieve
re ttlts almost in ta.ntly.

engageBrain Online Store. CengageBrain.com is a single destination for more than

1-,000 new print te..'..1:books, textbook rentals, eBooks, single eChapters, and print,
digital, and audio study tools. CengageBrain.com provides the freedom to purchase
engage Leruning products a la carte-exactly what you need, when you need it VJ.Sit
cengagebrain.com for details.

A Guide to the Basic Course for ESL Students. Written by Esther Yook, Mary
Washington College, this guide for non-native speakers includes strategies for accent
management and overcoming speech apprehension, in addition to helpful Web ad­
dresses and answers to frequently asked questions.

Resources for Instructors

PUBUC SPEAKING features a full suite of resources for instructors. These resources
are available to qualified adopters, and ordering options for student supplements are
flexible. Please consult your local Wadsworth Cengage Learning sales representative
for more information, to evaluate examination copies of any of these instructor or
student resources, or to request product demonstrations.

Instructor' Resource Manual Written by Terri Metzger of California State Univer­

sity San Marcos, the Instructor's Resource Manual provides a comprehensive teaching
system. Included in the manual are suggested assignments and criteria for evaluation,
chapter outlines, and in-class activities. All the Web Connect links and activities listed
at the end of each chapter of the student edition are included in detail in the Instruc­
tor's Manual in the event that online access is unavailable or inconvenient.

The Teaching Assistant's Guide to the Basic Course. Written by Katherine G.

Hendrix, University of Memphis, this resource was prepared specifically for new in­
structors. Based on leading communication teacher training programs, this guide clis­
cusses some of the general issues that accompany a teaching role and offers specific
strategies for managing the first week of classes, leading productive cliscussions, man­
aging sensitive topics in the classroom, and grading students' written and oral work.

Power Lecture. This one-stop lecture tool makes it easy for you to assemble, edit,
publish, and present custom lectures for your coru-se, using Microsoft PowerPoint®.
The PowerLecture lets you bring together text-specific lecture outlines and art,
along with video and animations from the Web or your own materials-culminating
in a powerful, personalized, media-enhanced presentation. The CD-ROM offers an

PREFACE •
 1t1f' , �IA- '� � Y.a-:a
'" ,,1 dilf' b , lf'6 1/�� ,, ✓,.,,. · ,

and,, fJ 14 ,,, ,, •nm ,,, 5' .,,,.'.1.IIJ"P, �, ,,,M H,'aJ"�,

,.

'XI ( /��
..,,, ,r.,,

" -, l#'o/Ml;d die ,1,,mf 'JIV7�, 1ltP- ,,,,,,m'"'"' � w� fjff#:J/rrllr/J

'(,,, �I,I'\ �,,

'ir.M:I! t:liWI. , ,,

1n,:tn1w-11,w • l'ulliuJ ff/JPJJ.kiYl(J: .,4n ()nJrr� /;J/f/f"(,l(J/:ft, P-11/,1///, ':r0/,,,. ·,

l'rol,Jem,./�J IRA'rrdng Awm,,✓,ft, and PtJJ,IJ�; lfflP,/Jld:rtfj: A �rm/:h /,µ/;u••t 1;

1mKJdi/or lmt'l"'tU:1/rrJI, WflllU>O by Oeanm Minim, f;� fl ,,t �flM¥1 i {,,,

wo•�-, indade a aJUff!lt �and WK� , ,,,,.ah� �✓-ti�-,.�
WhtJ �.��')'de, and��,�-,� "'!i:1� �:
vcr�•�. and ,�eill',mal (�.:jgJ ,:1<:f�,nJ KJ:,,ll$:f'�-

Gulde tn Teaddng Publk Speaking Online, � by"f,M ��111 rt .v-""'1 ,

CommunU), �, d:u8 betpful ,mne gi,ide pr,� ��,r� �? r�,1'),: :i,.,
� online · itb ffp8 wr �JJIWling (#,�1J(Kti' w.m� wirl'• ��,t.-t .t 1i,..,
OOUJ"8C r� �ft ace and ,� e�./JUT�� �� 1'f�� 11:l,r;,, « ,_
livering and M.lbm.itfulg �� am
raakir,g up ,Jfk, �� w � �4,:,,-
18 different ooline, �� ror �� and u� sucli � �«fk �J::::r) ,,,..
aitutue and c.-valuatioo form tail(xed to the ootine cm:m!'e,

Ser1Jke learning in CornnumkatJon !Jflulles: A Hr.uulbook, -.,.r-x - -,

� and Jet! �n. � is an invaluable r�ee kx � -� ;-,
sic� that jJtt!:_¥� or wm f!,Q(Jn integrate a.� learning <:fKfiV.K•
handbook pr� guidcli� for,� service learning Olk witl-1 c
ooncept8 and� for r;orlmlg (,,fffflively with� and 01�>!',.
provute.s moocl fmms and rt'J)Orts and a diredmy of ooJine :r�ces.

CourseCare 1raining awl Support. Get�� connecud, and g£=t ttf:

you need for tbc � integr"'dU(JD of digital r�as into your CfJUl:'JI':
paralleled tecluwlogy �a and tmining program provides robust onliw: r-­
pec.r-ro-peer � pen,onalv..ed trnming, an a customi:zable prog,arr
c.ount oo... Visit �.ge..com/�.re/ to sign up for onJine sen1inaIS, fi2''.
cl.a8s �, teclmi.<:al support, or�.ted face-to-face ttaiuing.. Om r;r;
on.site ttaini� are frequently led by one of our Lead TeacbeJs, faculty mem1>
ar, e¼pelU in using W�,dswmtb �,ge Leaming tedmology and can prr>·,
pr� and �mg tips,

Flex,Text Cw,1mnizatim1 P.rogram, With this program you can create: �

unique as your� quickly, simply , and affordably. As part of our fk:-x-:-
gr� you can add your pemonai toocll to PUBLIC SPEAKING with a�-
oov: rand up to 32 � ot your own cootatt-at no additional cost.

Acknowledgments
J would like to thank aJJ the students I've taught over the last 30 years; 1 ban: . ., :..-,
HO much about teaching public .speaking from them. I also owe heartfeh a;:,;::-.:;i·
tkm to the wa(.iung � I've worked with at Oregon State University �-•: ·.::r
niv� of Wi8con8in-Milwau.kff. Their creativity, freshness, and passion ru:.·,c- -=?

• PREFACE
me inspired more t.han they know, and they have improved my teaching immensely.
hlis Lundberg is the b st co-author imaginable, and I owe him more than I can say:
EuxaptOT6 EKarnvranMata, q>LA� µou. And finally, enormous thanks to my wife Kari­
you make everything possible.
-William Keith

I would like to thank Bill Keith for being a fantastic co-author and colleague, and Beth
Lundb rg for putting up with us in the process of writing this book.
-Chris Lundberg

The authors would like to thank the amazing editorial team at Cengage, including
Monica Eckman, as well as Elisa Adams, Barbara Armentrout, and Edward Dionne.
-Will'iam Keith and Chris Lundberg

........ . ....................................................................................
Reviewers
We are grateful to all the reviewers whose suggestions and constructive criticisms
have helped us shape this book.
Brenda Armentrout, Central Piedmont Community College
Joseph Averbeck, Marshall University
Thomas Benson, Penn State University
Marcia Berry, Azusa Pacific University
Sakile Camara, California State University Northridge
Nick Carty, Dalton State College
Mark Chase, Slippery Rock University
Jodi Cohen, Ithaca College
Doug Cole, Elizabethtown Community and Technical College
James Darsey, Georgia State University
Deanna Dannels, North Carolina State University
Katrina Eicher, Elizabethtown Community and Technical College
Lisa Eutsey, Dine College
Michael Fleming, Mt. San Jacinto College
Bonnie Gabel, McHenry County College
Susan Gilpin, Marshall University
Deborah Haffey, Cedarville University
Daria Heinemann, Keiser University
Kirn Higgs, University of North Dakota
Lawrence Hosman, University of Southern Mississippi
Mike Hostetler, St. John's University
Macdonald Kale, California University of Pennsylvania
Jim Kuypers, Virginia Tech
Rona Leber, Bossier Parish Community College
Richard Lindner, Georgia Perimeter College
Matt McGarrity, University of Washington
Terri Metzger, California State University San Marcos
Diane Monahan, Belmont University
Dante Morelli, Suffolk County Community College
Phyllis Ngai, University of Montana-Missoula

PREFACE •
V1 �' II 1wh,,f ,,,,, /M/11 111m1 f :11oli1m11111 I ht41m r1t11111
t
II t-1111 11,11,1 1 1 I l11t/11,,,r1tll!J/ 1 1 Nll flh11J ,1, IJ11/1rr 111/11
ll llf f 11,,-,, II, /1 11"/11 I /11/111(/t'
I 1, ,,,,,. I 1,I, , ,._, I I 111l•lftlf'l4lh1/ tl W111mvl1ttf/
A11 m1 I 11, II 114 ,,,,,,,,.1/t// 11,f' M111r11 Wo11h;/;rtf//1m,
If litflfh f(I, 'kW II, l,ll//f,/,11, / hlllilltt '/ftl!// (Jfd,1111,(///
H M ,&,,,,.,.. u, lf11/;111mJrJ,11, 011/JJtf/tt
JJ!//II
It h'11Wf ft, N111'/111tt/J, /11,tu IJ11m1m1111f1411// Jo/
tJ HI I,,m,., ( /(J/fl/fllffl, I ln;l11IIN1lftl!//
,II m • i,mrl , V1m,111N11,1,1t11 I ht4111f//rlftt111
,, 111 I ff lf#III 1, , "'llfUll/,li HIit/ft I Jrt;/J(ff//, '/ff,IJ//
uUt , ht// /'ttlfh tJ11m1r,111Prt/4//IJ 011 Ue11e
1
"'
. µt1 'f 1 tu rl f,, Iht4111flJrlJil!111t Mww //111rr/;11ri HtJJ/j/Jtr
1
,I
I Sm u , 'f'1 ff t'1 M111r11Jfwi,t I/tn!111Jl!rlli/1JJ
mm '1'11'1'1, Jlol1f//r't M11, rt" IJ11J1111tfrlfill/J
1 J1 vM VU Us m#, 'J'{lj1:lt11 'lwJ/1, Url!111Jlff'lttll/J
. CHOICES AND RESPONSIBILITY
One
CHAPTER 1
Public Speaking
CHAPTER 2
Ethics and the Responsible
Speaker
CHAPTER 3
Understanding Audiences
and Publics
CHAPTER 4
Becoming a Skilled Listener
 n h
mmuni ion

• in hy ubli
in i p w rful
o h in
•I n ify h kill
o compo e
p ch
choices at
g of the speech
er ion proc s

CHAPTER OUTLINE
In roduc:tlon: Why Learn Public
Sp king?
Sp ch I Pow rful
Th Communication Process
Th Public in Public Speaking
Sp king I About Making Choices
Th Sp king Proce s: Thinking,
Cr tlng, and Speaking
Thinking Through Your Choices
Cr tlng Your Fir t Speech
Giving Your Fir t Spa ch
M king R pon lbl Choices
 Public Speaking
anielle has a problem. Rather, her town has a
problem. Supplies at the local blood bank are
starting to get low, and this could be a problem
for the local hospital and trauma center. As the head of a
student volunteer group, she has been assigned to give
speeches to different groups on campus, trying to persuade
them to donate blood. As she thinks about her task, it seems
pretty intimidating. So many students! They are all so busy!
Who cares about blood donation while they are trying to make
rent or scrounge up some extra money for social activities?
Danielle imagines herself standing in front of lecture classes
and social groups like fraternities and sororities, and she feels
lost. Should she just get up and say, "Please donate?" No, it
needs to be more than that: She needs to give a short speech.
But how should she even get started?

Overview
If you want to be an effective speaker, first you'll want
to understand a few basic principles about public
speaking as a communication activity. This chapter will
give you an overview of the communication process,
highlighting the difference that public speaking can
make in your life and in the lives of the people listening
to you. You will learn about the process of composing
and delivering a public speech, focusing on the variety of

•

Introduction: Why Learn Public Speaking?
Speech Is Powerful
rhetoric Term from ancient
Greek for the study of how
words can persuade an
audience.
• PART ONE • FUNDAMENTALS OF GOOD
C'hoices you have to make when you give a speech. Finally, to
g t you started on the process of composing and delivering a
peech, we will walk you through the basic element s of speec:h
preparation, wh ich are the topics of the subsequent chapters. )
Caution: The con tent s of this book can be dangerous. Dangerous--but also PO\\·(c'rf
Whet her used for good or for ill, speech is one of the most powerful forces in hUrr�­
hist ory. Sometimes it ha s
been used to unite people aroun d a com mon demoer·a�
goal-for e xamp le, to advance the cause of civil righ ts. Other times dictators J- .,
1<:"
used speech as a powerful weapon. But however it is used, speech can change -�
world. More importantly, your speech can change your worl d in big and smaJ1 \"\· -
a:,
�
The principles we'l l introduce will help you give better speeches in almost �­
conte xt-even when your goal is modest. They will help you learn to be a bet ter pur1�'.
speaker-cle arer and more persuasive, but also more engaged, respon s ible, and w�-­
reasoned.
We often hear that public speaking is just about clear communication. It is in !k.
and people sometimes assume that anyone can do it without much effort or thout·
But performance counts too-actually getting up and talking in front of other pi:r)�:=
You may be surprised to find out by the end of this course, however, that getti.:- i -�
and speaking in front of other people can be the easy part. In this book, we wou. ��
to introduce you to the range of skills that go into preparing, producing, and deli- -:-.:.�
a speech, and that will make you a more effective advocate f o r yourself and : ·-:
people and ideas you care about.
You may not be in this class for the sake of changing the world: Many sr
take a public speaking course because it is required. But taking this course, v.
through this book, and adopting your instructor's advice on how to be a better
speaker will make you more successful not only in class but also in your every __
and beyond the classroom.
You are about to become part of a tradition of skills that stretches back tho ::5
of years. So stick with us: We hope to convince you of the power of words.
world-changing capability that each of us has if we learn how to develop and ...
responsibly.
Whatever brought you to this class, public speaking is important not only fc• ·· �•
education and career, but also for your life and for the health of our democrac ·x:
will argue that speech is powerjul and that speech matters.
The study of publi c speaking began in ancient Greece. For the Greeks, public spec ,::r;
was part of the broader field of rhetoric, or the study of how words could persuade> :lf,
audience. In the modern world , many people associa te public speaking with marnpul.1-
tion, and the term rhetoric with "empty talk." They may say, "Let's have less rhewn,
and more action." Although it is true that talk is sometimes empty, good speech car
also be a f orm of action, motivating people to make important changes in the worl,1
yo1,
To see why, the first thing to understand is that bec ause speech is powerful.
f .
speech c an be pow er ul
SPEAKING
j
 ■ Th
• • . • ♦ • ♦ • •• • ♦ • • ♦ • • • • . ♦ •• t ••• t. t • t • t • •

Pow r of Publi Speaking

• t . • . t ♦ t t• • I I I • • ♦ •
♦ t f I • • • • ♦ • t I I • • • ' ♦ • • ♦ • • • • • I • ♦ • • • • • • ♦ • • •
l
to Chang th World
ne of the fu Ip ople t.o W1ite about U1e power
of public p cch, th Greek phllosopher Gor­ Why start try talking about
gias f L ntini, claimed that "sp ech is a pow- the Greeks?
rful lord." 1\v<>nty-fl hundred y ar later, Our culture has Inherited a number of ideas about communication
bW1dant evidence u1 pmts Gorgias's insight. and pollttcal institutions from andent Greek and Roman (also called
h ha, e be n u ed for good and bad "dassleal") practice. The founders of the Unrted States used them
nd . They have introduced and converted as models, Many elassical principles and terms they developed are
many to the world's great religions. They have still useful and relevant; for example, in Chapter 7 we'll examine
h lped elect presidents and overthrow dicta­ persuasive appeals in speaking through the lens of the classical
to1 . Th y have begun wars and ended them. distinction between ethos, logos, and pathos.
Wm ton Churchill's and Franklin Roosevelt's
p ch s rallied the British and U.S. popula-
tions during World War II. In the 19th century, Elizabeth Cady Stanton spoke out to make
p ople aware of the rights of women. In the middle of the 20th century, the speeches of
Martin Luther King showed people in the United States how to think differently about
civil rights and issues of race and racism.
We need the power of words to speak a
beUer world into existence. Speech, used ef­ Can speeches really change
fectively, should not only motivate us to make the world?
changes on our campuses, in our communities, Here are some speeches that helped to change the course of
and as a nation. It should also help us make history. If you would like to learn more about any of them, access
better decisions about the kinds of changes. your CourseMate at CengageBrain.com and look in Web Lfnks
We need to speak with clarity and conviction, under Chapter 1.
but we also need to listen and be attentive to "Against Imperialism," William Jennings Bryan
other people's viewpoints. Thus, one of the "Acres of Diamonds," Russell H. Conwell
biggest challenges of our time is to learn how "Mercy For Leopold and Loeb," Clarence Darrow
to speak in a way that generates cooperation "Statement to the Court," Eugene V. Debs
and insight and that avoids division and "Farewell Address," Dwight D. Eisenhower
narrow-mindedness. "197 6 DNC Keynote Address," Barbara Jordan
"Inaugural Address," John F. Kennedy
But what can learning how to speak well
ul Have a Dream," Martin Luther King
do for you? After all, you will probably not be
"Every Man a King," Huey Long
in the position of addressing the nation in a "The Ballot or the Bullet," Malcolm X
time of war or convincing Congress to change "Farewell Address to Congress," General Douglas MacArthur
a law. The point of this course is not to change "Pearl' Harbor Address to the Nation," Franklin D. Roosevelt
you into an Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Winston "The Fundamental Principle of a Republic," Anna Howard Shaw
Churchill, or Martin Luther King. "Declaration of Conscience," Margaret Chase Smith
........... . ...................................................................... ...........
■ The Power of Speeches to Change Your World
Even though speeches can change the world, common sense tells us they can also
make a big difference in your individual history. Every day, people speak in court­
rooms, boardrooms, and classrooms to persuade others of their points of view or to
inform others about things they need to know. A good speech can make all the differ­
ence in winning a lawsuit, pitching a business idea, or teaching people about some­
thing that might significantly change their lives. And, ultimately, that is the point of this
book: Because speech is such a powerful tool, we should learn to use it as effectively
and as responsibly as we can.

e
The skills you will le arn here will also make you a more effective speaker in your
career. If you want to come across as the candidate to hire when applying for a dream

CHAPTER 1 • PUBLIC SPEAKING


an speeches really make
a dilference in my life?
Here are som e examples of the kinds of speeches that can
ch ange the course of your life If you deliver them effec tively:
• The spe ech you give as an answer to the job intervi ew
question, "Tell us a little bit about yourself"
• The speech you give when you pitch an Important business idea
The speech you give when you are trying to persuade
people In your community (for example, a town council or
neighborhood association) to change something In your
com munity that needs changing
• The speech you give when convincing a loved one to do
somethin g-to enter a long-term relationship, for example, or
to support you in an important endeavor
• The speeches you give to convince others to vote for a
candidate or a law that affects your everyday life
job, being well spoken is a crucial part of your suc­
cess. U you prepare well for the interview, thinking
about how to present yourself as a fitting and capable
candidate, if you perform well by speaking clearly
and articulately, if you make a persuasive case, and
if you invite the participation of the interviewers by
fostering a good dialogue, you can be a shoo-in for
the position. By the same token, if you pitch a busi­
ness proposal to a supervisor, client, or a lender, you
will need to project an attitude of competency and
meticulous preparation as well as speak articulately
and build a relationship with your listeners.
The basic principles are similar for any speech,
whether it is delivered on the Senate floor, in a State
of the Union address, in a business meeting, or be­
fore a local community group. In each instance, you
need to plan carefully what you will say and how
you will say it, and you need to build a relationship
with the audience.

democracy A system of
government where people
govern themselves, either
through direct votes on policy
issues (direct democracy)
or by electing officials who
deliberate and make decisions
on their behalf (representative
democracy).
1:- good public speech, no matter what the context, ultimately strives towards the best
ideals of democracy. If you have a dollar bill in your pocket, take it out. The Great
S�al of �he U �ted States is reproduced on the back of the bill. On the left side is a pyra­
_
mid mside a c�cle, and on the right side is a circle with an eagle in it. The eagle has a
_
small scroll m its mouth. If you look closely, you will see the Latin phrase E pluribus
unum, m:aning "From many, one." The many people who make up the United States
are all UIUted-we are all in this together.

"From many, one" on the

U.S. dollar bill expresses the
essence of democracy.

PART ONE • FUNDAMENTALS OF GOOD SPEAKING

 Democracy only works, or at least we wil l
only be able to make it work, if we respect the
fact that we are many people with substa ntial
diff r nces in opinion, race, class, sexuality,
gender, religion, and belief. But we also strive
to make from these differences a common
identity or at least a common commitment to
democracy and the well-being of our fellow
citizens.
Public speaking, at its best, is about re­
specting that common commitment-public
Can speeches really make a
difference on campus?
At most schools, the student government controls thousands of
dollars for student programs. In addition to universfty policy, what
determines how that money is spent? Typi'cally, elected members
of the student governmE!nt decide, How? They get together in a
room ancl talk. If you are in favor of spending money on a particular
activity or club, you;II speak up in favor of it. Here's a case where
your ability to be clear and persuasive with your peers could change
th e quality ot campus life for a huge number of students. No matter

speaking is about the unity of democracy. But how strongly you believe in your cause, your speech is what makes
your beliefs matter.
it is also about respecting the pluralism of
democracy-namely, that we need to speak
and listen in a way that preserves the impor-
tant differences that make each of us who we are.
Now you may be saying to yourself, "Wait

a minute. I was hoping to get some communi­
cation skills out of this class that I could use
in business, for my job." In fact, you will get
that, and more. Successful and effective per­
suasion and informative speaking in politics,
business, and even personal life can invoke
Lo
FAQ
What do pluralism and unity mean
for pub{ic speaking?
Pluralism m eans that our de 1T:1ocracy is made up of people who are
diffe rent�they have differen�. backgroun ds, including diffe re nces of
class, n:ice; ge n c':ler, s exuality, relrgious ori.entatfon, an d geographkal
. rigiiil,s. But ptl.ir'alisrn is more than jUJst our different backgr,ounds.
1

the highest democratic values. Why? Because Th ere .is also €iifrferen�e· in 0 er-m9cracy becaus e we have differe l\lt
speakers who make good decisions consider ideas qnd be llie fs.
the effects of their words on all stakeholders, Unit� meamsthgt·these clifferemces are not disabling: We are all
or all the people who have something at stake members o{ the s•ar;n� l,il· atim,al' gubli'c.
in the decisions. Skilled speakers not only
know how to adapt to their audience of stake­
holders, but they understand their audience's diversity.
unity Harmony among related

... .. .. . .. . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . ... . ... . .... . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . .... .... .. . . ... . . .. . . . .

parts

■ The Conversational Framework pluralism The coexistence

of numerous ethnic, cultural,
In this book we'll distinguish different approaches to communication, especially political or religious groups in
public communication. Speakers are never just informing and persuading; there one nation.
is always a larger context that creates mutual responsibilities between speakers
and their audiences. To sharpen the picture, let's compare advertising and de­
mocracy as contexts for communication. They represent fundamentally different stakeholders The people who
have something to lose or gain
approaches to public discourse and different ways of understanding this mutual as the result of a decision or
responsibility. policy.
In advertising, a company is trying to sell something, to get someone to buy some­
thing. Ads target specific groups of people called market segments-men between
30 and 40, for instance, or working women who live in urban areas, or Twitter users.
Advertisers are successful when sales increase; their responsibility to their audience
is fairly limited and communication is usually just in one direction.
In contrast, in the context of democracy, communication is among people or citi­
zens "thinking together." Decisions should emerge as a result of the mutual exchange
of arguments, information, and points of view. Democracy is big and messy; imag­
ine it as an enormous system in which different ideas and arguments circulate, being
expressed (and maybe changed) at many different points. Sometimes it's you and a
friend talking about what the government should do about student loans; sometimes
it's you reading a debate about student loan :finances in the newspaper or on a website.

CHAPTER 1 • PUBLIC SPEAKING •

 ,' "' :-4u �- ,, , � If n: nm te- w tching an m-gurnent being mocked on a satirical
t, u, t'thm it'$ your pru"f'nt attending a community meeting to hear

part oft.he larger public dialogue, and you might

·t-n if you don't ee yourself as particularly politi ­
p tmck for a few days of how often you think and
Ip i -the matter.
m ndvertlsing. Democratic conversation, or dla-
o ell product . It involves everybody, not just a
c-essful, arguments have to be adaptable to bo th
. and of different races, religions, regions of the
nn . and o on. Adverting bypasses differences like
Y sele<'th l_\· t ler a tdi nee of people that have something in
i\\l\lOorl.
""' � :\ ud nt is ,.,, ing t ·ve an informative speech on a surprising or con­
troYt•fSinl t · , u h the ampu need for transgender bathrooms. An advertising
ooonlaCti '< uld probably tru1 by de.fining the target market as the types of people
most fil..'e)y to be upntheti t xualities different from their own and would igno re
� 1 else. It hard t imagine, however, how the student would give a speech to a
class and · 1ore many · m t of the people in it.
hl contrast, in a dem era.tic conversation or dialogue, the speaker would begin
by identi(ying the larger public issues that connect to the availability of transgender
bathroon equruity, ci\il rights,, and the increasing acceptance of gay and transgen­
der people. The speak-er would be placing the issue of transgender bathrooms within
lamer discussions that have been going on for 10, 50, or maybe 150 years, portraying
the issue as part of a larger convei:sation about civil rights or equality.
Or for another example, consider a speech about yoga. In a public speaking class,
· it the speak-er"s job to '"sell" yoga to her classmates? Probably not. But she could

Democracy relies on mutual

exchanges of opinions and
information, often through
public speaking.

• PART ONE • FU DAME TALS OF GOOD SPEA I G

J)t'<' nl th infom,nllon slw gnhwct from hN re. earch on yoga in the context of public
ro11 C't nU n nb 111 h<'ollh, nthl<'lk perfonnancc, or en spirituality.
ur point here I t.hnt. while y011 are learning many new techniques in public
P aldng I , 11 h n oullinlng, research, and delivery, you will also learn new ways
of nnctc1 tandlng Uw kind of ommtmlcntlon that makes up truly public speaking. It
I n't quite Iii tH.lking t.o Mends about movies and music, and It isn't like a sales pitch.
Public P aking is t.he adventure of taking your turn In one of the amazing ongoing
publi onv rsntions t.hat arc happening 1ight now.
In hort, peech is powerful, m,d it matters in ways you may not have thought
t mu h about, but aft. r taking U,is course, you'll never hear a speech the same way
again. N w let' look at an ove1vie w of the actual process.

The Co1n1nunication Process

In this book, we'll often refer to communicating in the context of public speaking as
rh t01·i.c, but with a different meaning than you're used to. As we noted, today the
tenn rheto1·ic is often negative and refers to discourse that is empty, insincere, and
pmnpous. In its classical sense, however, rhetoric is about the art of speaking, and it
requires at least tlu-ee components:
• a speaker,
• a listener, and
• some means of getting information between them.
There might be a conversation between two people or among several people, as
in a group discussion. Or, as in public speaking situations, there might be one speaker
and a large audience. Or the medium might change: One person writes a letter or email
to another, or a letter is published in the newspaper and read by thousands of people.
Even though the "speakers" and "listeners" are not physically present, we can still use
the tem1s speaker (writer) and listener (reader) because the communication situa­
tions are parallel: In all of them, the speaker is trying to accomplish something with
tl1e listener, using language. Of course, there are also differences: Speakers in person
generate nonverbal cues to meaning, and for writers, layout, design, and color can
communicate more than the words say or sometimes something different from what
the words say.
For most of us "speaking" involves opening our mouths and having words come
out. But if you are Deaf, speaking means using your hands to create American Sign
Language (ASL) or American Signed English. And what about the many of the pub­
lic speeches that are written out in advance, some existing only as texts? Many
"speeches" inserted into the Congressional Record, for example, have never been spo­
ken aloud. We mention ASL and written speeches to emphasize that "speaking" is a
complex phenomenon and to encourage you to think about what speech is and how
it is generated.

Try It! Tour Rhetorical Situations

Make a list of the most common rhetorical situati0ris yoll engage in:
• Wliio ar.e the most common listeners? Why?
• Are these situations l!JSl!lally face,to-face 0r electnomic? Why?
• Wliiich 0nes ar;e easiest? Most difficult? Why?

CHAPTER 1 • PUBLIC SPEAKING •

 I ompl0x
t ny forms,
n n I n u ge,
11hown I T: I Llhua of
th Chi P ople's Political
Consult tlv Conference
(I ft) joins a panel discussion
in B ljing with the help of a
lgn I nguage interpreter.
The Public in Public Speaking
ndaptatlon Adjusting a topic,
arguments, and presentation to
fit a particular audience.
public A group of people who
har a common set of concerns.
PART ONE • FUNDAMENTALS OF GOOD SPEAKING
•
An audience is not the same as the people listening or reading by chance; people
who happen to overhear a conversation are not the audience for the con ersation.
Audiences are made up of a variety of people, with different beliefs, values, and life
experiences. And the speaker wants something from all of them-their attention
their patience, their comprehension, their openness, a change of mind, a change
of action.
Much of the time speaking (and writing) is not only an expression of the speaker's
thoughts but is also in an important sense tailoredfor the audience. Speakers need to
know something about their audience so that they can adapt to them. Just as in ordi­
nary conversation, you say different things or the same thing in different ways depend-
ing on whom you are talking to, speakers adjust their topic and presentation to their
audience. Adaptation is one of the central concepts of rhetorical communication. 1
Is the audience ever more than just the people in the room with the speaker? To
explain why it is called public speaking, we need to consider the concept of a public,
or a group of people who share a common set of concerns.
In Figure 1.1, the speaker is attempting to influence or inform an audience
whose members belong to more than one public. For example, the audience at a
PTA meeting will be part of the public that cares about the fate of children as well
as the public that pays taxes. If the speaker is making an informative presentation
about the current state of student achievement in the district, she will need to
think about a particular public in deciding what information is relevant and how
to frame it.
Yet the diagram in Figure 1.1 is incomplete. Why? Because it pictures the speaker
as separate from or outside the public. However, when you are speaking to an audi­
ence in public, you are speaking with an audience composed of fellow members of
your public. The speaker portrays herself and the audience not as opposed to each
other ("I care about one thing, and you care about something else") but as pai.t of the
same public ("Here is what we care about"), as shown in Figure 1.2.
 FIGURE 1.1
Audience members belong
to more than one public.

So whether we're looking at informative, persuasive, or special-occasion speak­

informative speech A speech
ing, we'll generally talk about the public as a way of talking about the context for an whose primary purpose is to
audience. This is important because speakers need to understand who the audience educate the audience about
a topic.
is if they're going to adapt their information to them. For example, if you were giving
an informative speech on the idea of a taxpayer bill of rights, the public would most
likely be "people concerned about tax policy." If you were giving a persuasive speech persuasive speech A speech
whose primary purpose is to
arguing for changes to make student loan programs more widely accessible, the rel­ change the audience's opinion
evant publics would be "people concerned about access to education" and "people about a topic or to encourage
them to take a particular action.
who believe education is essential to the economic success of the United States." Even
a special-occasion speech, such as a eulogy at a funeral, can be addressed to a public;
if the deceased volunteered at the Humane Society, his friends will talk about how his special-occasion speech A
speech made on the occasion
accomplishments mattered to people who care about animals. of a life transition (such as a
The concept of the public allows us to distinguish public speaking from adver­ wedding) or at a professional
event (such as introducing a
tising and other forms of private and personal communication. (More about this in speaker).
Chapter 3.) The concept of the public provides a means for you to connect to an

FIGURE 1.2
The speaker and the
audience both belong to
the same publics.

..,.
0
N
0,

E
�

CHAPTER 1 • PUBLIC SPEAKING •


Speaking Is About Making Choices
choices In public speaking,
the choices are about topic,
information and arguments,
organization, visual aids and
other supporting materials, and
type of delivery.
delivery The act of making a
speech to an audience.
( respond by asking questions, and you need to have a strategy for dealing with their
• PART ONE • FUNDAMENTALS OF GOOD SPEAKING
audien e in an ethical and efiectiYe way by fo using on in.le ts that
not just as tudent in a c.lassroom but also as memb rs f a broad r itizem .. Wh<'n
you speak in class, you will be addr ing a public only if the tJtin w u talk abou t
implk..ate the interests of your auctien ce members not just as fe llO\ 1 mate· hut
also as members of a larger national pu blic.
It may seem a little strange to think about speaking as making choic • Isn't peaking
just saying what you 're thinking? However, if you reflect for a momen you ma real­
ize that you are often sure of what your thoughts are only as you are saying th m, and
you may say them differently depending on the person you're talking to.
In creating a speech, you make choices about what to say. Two thousand Y ars
ago, when public figures in classical Greece and Rome wanted to give a spe h,
they might turn to a rhetorician (called a logographer, or "speechwriter") to figtu·e
out how to compose and deliver the speech. Now, most of us do this for ourselve s.
Ancient rhetorical practice was organized around the canons (rules or principles) of
rhetoric, which broke the process of speaking into five parts: (1) Come up with con­
tent, (2) organize it, (3) choose words for it, (4) memorize it, and then (5) deliver it.
We teach public speaking a little bit differently 2,000 years later, and in this book
we propose a simplified and updated model that focuses on the choices you will need
to make to give a successful speech.
First, preparation: How will you prepare your speech? What do you want to say?
What information and arguments will you use to support your claims? How will
you organize the speech and move from point to point? What words, images,
or technology will be important to creating a compelling experience for the
audience?
Second, per:formance: How will you deliver or "perform" you speech? What
tone, pace, and gestures will you use? You will need to make sure that you speak
clearly, loud enough for the auctience to hear, and you will need to eliminate
distracting speech and body tics. Few speeches are memorized nowadays, but
you'll have to decide how to master the information in your speech and create
materials like notecards or slides that allow you to deliver it.
When you think of public speaking, performance, or delivery, is probably the part
of the process you think of first. Images of shaking knees, sweaty palms, and a nervous
stomach may come to mind, but effective preparation can result in more comfortable
performances. Preparation means planning the best way to present your message so
that the audience will respond favorably. You need to ask what the audience's inter­
ests are in this topic and in listening to you talk about it; you also need to think about
their expectations and predispositions. Finally, you need to give the audience a stake
in what you are saying by providing them an opportunity to participate. They may
questions, but you also need to give them an opportunity to participate by changing
their beliefs and or actions as a result of the speech.
...... ..... .. ......... .................................................... .. .. .... .. . ... ... ..
■ Preparation
The moment when you s�d up and give your speech may not be the most important,
or even the most difficult, part of the process. Although the performance components
may trigger the nerves that make your stomach shaky as you think about giving a
speech, the prepnml.ion Lhat goes inLo cleciding what to say is more difficult and prob­
ably more important. thm1 I.he performance. Great. delivery with nothing much to say
isn't effective communication. We all admir· and ef\Joy a great performer, and some­
times we assume that a musician's or actor's talent is responsible for the impressive
concert or play. In fact, no matter how talented, the rutist has put a huge amount of
careful preparation into creating that compelling event for the audience.

Jry It! Preparation Choices Checklist

Run through the following checklist when you are preparing a spe ech:
How do I want to structure the speech?
• What arguments do I want to use?
What kinds of research will be most helpful to do and to pr,esent to the audiencrer?
What sources and ideas will the audience find most credible?
• Am I taking into account possible objections or rebuttals to my arguments?
• What is the product of my preparation? A memorized speech, notes, images? And
how should I use them?

The most critical part of speaking may well be the thought that goes into it. Why?
First of all, good delivery depends on good preparation; The preparation that you put
you put into your speech beforehand may be one of your best defenses against feeling
nervous about or even overwhelmed by public speaking.
Speaking should be communication. You should say what you think, or better yet,
you should present the best information and your most thoughtful opinions on your
subject matter. In contrast to acting, which involves saying someone else's words, pub­
lic speaking is speaking your own mind. In the case of actor, it's unclear exactly who
is communicating to the audience. The writer? The actor? A combination of them? In
public speaking, it's all you. You are both writer and actor. So although the way you
give a speech may be a kind of performance, it is important to think of speaking as a
process that allows you to say what you think to someone in particular.

Public speaking is above all

communication.

CHAPTER 1 • PUBLIC SPEAKING •

 Deriding u hat to say implies making some important choices based on Your
opin ion and on U,e materials an d too ls that are available to you: ideas, argument.s,
in ,ag words, and metaphors. Thjs means that you have to put work into preparing
our speech, a proce we call invention. As illustration, let's look in more detail at
the kind of ch oices speakers make when they prepare speeches that inform and per­
uade an auili nee.

.. . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . ...
Informing
Many tin1es as a speaker you are trying to convey information to an auilience. Some­
tin1es you are in the role of an expert, sometimes a sort of teacher; in other cases you
are more like the messenger delivering the news, like a reporter. In each case you're
trying to get information across to the auilience clearly and effectively.
Some people mjstakenly assume that if you know what you're talking about, you'll
automatically be clear, but that's not necessarily true. Think back to some of your least
favorite teachers. They may have been experts, but they may not have been very good
at communicating their knowledge.
Why is that? How can expertise and good communication be two different things?
It happens because communication is not only about the knowledge in the speaker 's
head but about the auilience as well. The auilience can't understand things they don't
understand. That seems obvious, but many speakers ilisregard it. To explain or clarify
something to an auilience, you have to assume that they don't already understand it,
and then choose to explain it in terms their current knowledge.

Making Choices: Example 1 Suppose you are faced with explaining a new univer­
sity regulation to a group of students on your campus. The university has decided
"any drug or alcohol-related tickets or arrests involving students will have aca­
demic repercussions." Right now, you (like the hypothetical audience) are prob­
ably wondering what that means-"repercussions"? As a speaker, you have some
choices.
• First, you have to decide what your role will be. Are you speaking on behalf of
the university or as just a student?
• Even though you'll cover the same information in either case, if you are speak­
ing as a student, you'll highlight benefits or consequences for students, includ­
ing yourself. If you speak on behalf of the school, you may feature the reasons
for the decision and what it means for the school.
• Depending on which way you go, you'll change the order of points
(probably putting the ones most important to the auilience last), and you'll
change any charts or illustrations you use, since these highlight the things that
will be most memorable for the auilience about the information.

. .... .. .. . . . .. . . .. . .... . . ... .. .. . ..... . .. .. .. . .... .... ...... .. . .. . .. .. ....... ..... ... ........
■ Persuading
Sometimes we want more than just to have the auilience understand us·' we want
them to believe or do something. By persuasion, we mean all the ways a speaker can
attempt to influence an auilience, from informing them about a topic to arguing they
should change their beliefs or inspiring them to action. All of these are "persuasive"
in the sense that they are attempts to influence the auilience. Even in an informative
speech, you adapt it to the auilience, trying to make sure they not only understand but
also care about the information.

PART ONE • FUNDAMENTALS OF GOOD SPEAKING

•
Making Choices: Example 2 You are probably so used to making choices about
what to say that you don't realize that you are always choosing what to say and how
to say it. Here's a simple interpersonal example. Suppose you'd like to get your friend
Brian to go to a movie with you on a Friday night. You start with "movie" and "Brian,"
but from there you have a lot of choices. You have to decide whether you think he
will automatically want to go to a movie, or if you'll have to convince him. If you're
going to convince him, you'll consider what would motivate him. Is he looking for
a relaxing time after a hard week? Is he bored with his job and looking for excite­
ment? Does he enjoy dinner before a movie, or does he love a big bucket of popcorn
with his flick? You might research what movies are playing, and you may choose one
based on what kind of movie Brian likes. Or you may try to convince Brian to see the
movie you're interested in. If Brian were someone you didn't know well, you might
have to approach the request more formally; with a fairly close friend, you can be
pretty inforn1al.
Without realizing it, all of these choices may flash through your head before you
dec to say to your friend, "Hey, bud, want go and check out the midnight showing
ide
of Donny Darko? You know you love that flick, and we can grab some food afterward."
Your process for public speaking will be similar: You need to interpret the audience
and purpose (whom you're talking to and what you want from them), and as the next
example shows, there are always choices about that interpretation.

Making Choices: Example 3 Let's say you need to give a presentation to the city
council asking for a change in the zoning laws for a skateboard park Your audience is
the city council members, who will vote on your proposal. So what are your choices?
You probably don't need to know much about the city council members personally,
because they probably don't make zoning decisions based exclusively on their being
a man or a woman or white, Asian, or Hispanic. Their decisions are more likely based
on their functions as city council members: interpreting the law and serving the public
interest. What you want to say about your topic is to a large extent detern1ined by what
you want to convince them to do, but your approach to your audience and how you
want to persuade them requires some strategic choices.

Responsible public speakers

approach different audiences
in different ways. A town
council meeting is different
from a classroom and from
the halls of Congress. I I
�
CHAPTER 1 • PUBLIC SPEAKING •
 Why should the city counci l change the zo ning Jaws? Because it b n fits You and
your ftiends? Naturally, yo u think that it does, but will that rnov city ouncil merri.
be1 ? Probably not. Can you argu e that it benefits them? Yes, b ut be car ful : Y ou're not
talking about benefiting th council members personally, b ut rath r you ar arguin�
to their role as council members-they should car ab out the benefits to th :it y. H<Jw
would the ne w park benefit the cit-y? Presumably it will generate som tax rev nue an,J
p erhaps some part-time employment.
However, because t hey have to think about th go od of the dty, th y'll have I.IJ
consider two problems: W hat if noise from the park bothers th neighbors or skaterl!
get rowdy? You'll need to clearly address those issues , or you can't xpect the coun�il
to take you very seriously. As you de cide what to argue, you also ne d to think about.
langua ge choices. You might think about how you want to address them mbers ("Sir"
and "Ma'am" versus "You guys"), and about how you want to desc-r �be the s�� park
Will it be in terms that get them visualizing it ("Imagine all these kids exerc1smg and
staying out of trouble") or in terms that support your argument ("Data on skateparkl!
show they are good civic investments")? You might use analogies to national or state
parks. You may even think about how you 'll dress for the occasion-will it be in skater
clothes or something more formal? You'll have to consider which would be better and
why. Skater clothes might show you're in touch with the future users, but something
more formal might show that you should be taken seriously.

The Speaking Process: Thinking, Creating,

and Speaking
Now that you have an idea about a public speaker's choices, let's look at the actual
process. What do you have to do to give a speech? It's useful to see preparati on as
having two parts: the analysis and the "writing" of the speech. First, you will need to
think-analyze-what you want to say in the particular situation for your particular
audience. Then, you will need to create a speech that is well organized, crafted for
maximum effect, and has good supporting arguments. After that, you are ready to
speak; you will need to deliver the speech in such a way that it will not only be listened
to but also be heard and acted upon by the audience. Here is a brief outline of the
process:
Think:
• Choose a topic: What things are important to you that you would like to say
to your audience?
• Audience: Who will be listening, and what is their interest in the topic?
• Goals: What do you want the audience to do, either by learning, acting, or
changing beliefs?
Create:
• Arguments: What claims, propositions, or ideas would you like the audience
to believe?
• Research: How will you support your arguments with evidence, statistics,
quotes from experts, and other materials that lend credibility to your case?
• Organization: How will you put your points together so that they have a
clear pattern that is easy for the audience to follow?
• Words: How will you phrase your ideas so that they are both clear and com­
pelling to the audience?

PART ONE • FUNDAMENTALS OF GOOD SPEAKING

•

j
 Speak:
• Deli ery: Whal choic will you make about the peifonnance of the speech.
How will ou act (for example. will you make an effort at eye contact , and
what choices will you make in ,·erbal cyle (tone, pitch, ratf", emphasis. clarity)
to make sure that your speech has maximum persuasive effect?
• Anxiety: What strategies and techniques will ou use for managing yom
nerves?

Thinking Tlu"ot1gl1 Yot1r Cl1oices

To preview how the chapters of this book will walk you through these steps of the speak­
ing proces.5, we'll use the example at the beginning of the chapter, in which Danielle wac;
trying to figure out how to give a speech persuading other stndents to donate blood
Each part of speech preparation involves a set of choices; Danielle needs to recognize
both what her choices are and how to make them responsibly. First, the analytic part of
preparation: Think about who your audience is and what your goals :regarding them are.

................... ................... ................... . . . . ... .... . . . . ........ .......... ...

■ Your Responsibilities (Chapter 2)
First, Danielle has to orient herself to what we'll call the ethical dimensions of this
speaking situation. She needs to ask herself what her relationship is to her audience.
Does she want to get donations, and she doesn't care how she gets them? Even if
Danielle isn't willing to lie to get people to donate, she might still employ half-trntbs
or misleading statements. This stance toward the audience shows a lack of rhetorical
or communicative responsibility, because it divides Danielle from the audience (1m
persuading you"). A more responsible approach would create a context where Dani­
elle and the audience together are coming to understand the mutual benefits of blood
donation ("We need to do something about the local blood shortage"). Before Danielle
can start thinking about what to say, she needs to clarify what she intends to do with,
or to, the audience in this situation.

■ Your Audience (Chapters 3, 4)

Now, Danielle must think about the nature of her audience. She can think about her audi­
ence in general terms, especially the obstacles that might prevent them from being blood
donors already. Some students are busY with schoolwork plus jobs or family or all three.
Other students may be uninterested. Either way, Danielle knows that her speech needs
to be entertaining and informative and that it must give the audience a reason to show up
at the blood donation station and be poked with a needle for little or no compensation.
After she takes these general issues into account, she might think more specifi­
cally about the actual group she will address-is it a random sampling of students in a
course, a volunteer group, or a campus social group? Here, Danielle will need to think
about why people are in the audience in the first place and th.en to think about how
she can use the picture of the audience that she is developing to motivate them to give
blood. Finally, she'll probably realize that there are a couple of specific fears about
blood donation that might come into play with any audience: Some people are afraid
of blood, and some people are freaked out by needles; she'll have to take th.Me fears
into account at some point in her speech. In addition, some people fear (wrongly) that
they can get a disease just from giving blood.

CHAPTER 1 • PUBLIC SPEAKING •

- --

ltet· lsst1t,\-the blood supply-is oue that concerns us all, and so it is a public
\ ·· ue. Whul kind of public l h •1· audience of colleg e students relative to the issue of
blood donation'? Despite a]l the cliff rences between students (older, younger, urban,
rurn.l, nuu femal • ), ·iu1 she find a common characteristic that gives them a reason to
say y s to bl od dona.ti n'?
Her I where Dani ll •'s rhetorical creativity comes in. She can describe the audi­
en e lo th rnselv s, Th y m·e busy college students, yes ... but they are also people
who might get l k or h\jur d aml need some blood at the hospital. "Potential blood­
bank u r�" may not be how th students think about themselves, but it's a true de­
s rlpti n, and it' r levant to Danielle's purpose: It transforms the audience into a
publi , with a rnutual. intere t in blood donations. Another possible public would be
"p ·opl who value publi s 1vice." Many college students either fall into this group or
wi h th y lid, and Dm1i 11 an giv th m the opportunity to perform a public service.
ani U ne ds to speak in a way that helps the audience listen and want to listen.
Thi in ·lucle th use of ton , pacing, and transitions to keep the audience involved.
anl ll also n ds to present arguments in a balanced way that takes into account the
n d , xp tations and precli positions of the audience. She also needs to present her-
·lf a a p rson who is op n to and respectf1.ll toward the opinions of the audience.She
n d to 1iv th m all the vidence that they need to mal<e an informed decision, and she
n d to provide th m with concrete steps that they can take if they choose to donate
bl d. Fimuly, Daniell should allow the audience tinle to ask questions, if this is ap­
pr µriate, and to answ r the questions in a clear, engaging, and nonconfrontational way.

............ .. .. ............. .............. . .. ......... ... ....... .. .. .. .... ... . .. . .. .. .......

■ Your Goals (Chapter 5)
Dani II h to ass s th ituation. In this case, she already has a topic (sometimes
that' not th case). What ar her goals? She should clearly distinguish between her
p 1 0118.1 goal (what she wants to accomplish) and her goals with the audience (what
h wants h r sp ch to a complish). She can't just say, "Hey, donate blood, because
if I get In go d with the blood bank people, I'm s t for an internship, and that would
1J a big r sum boo t r." That's her persona.I goal; she will benefit if she can get more

PART ONE • FUNDAMENTALS OF GOOD SPEAKING

•
blood in the blood bank by recrniting more donors. Her goal with the m1,<.lieru:e would
be to persuade them to voluntarily clonat,e blood through the campus program. But this
goal has some inherent challenges: Why donate blood on campus for a few cookies
when you might be able to get money somewhere else for selllng your blood pl,asma.
Danielle would like to get students to want to show up at one of the campus sites. She
doesn't need to control or manipulate them or make them into better people; she just
needs to get them to see why it would be right to donate. Danielle wants to choose a
goal that is not only appropriate to the situation but also defensible.

Creating Your First Speech

Once Danielle has made some tentative decisions about her audience, her goals, and
the audience's relationship to her topic, she has to start creating her speech, which is
the second part of preparation.

■ Information and Arguments (Chapters 6, 7)

• • • • • • •. •. • • e e • • • • •♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ e ♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ t ♦♦♦♦♦♦I♦♦♦♦

In order for Danielle to persuade her audience, she'll need to provide information
about blood donation and, for this specific situation, reasons why students should
donate, and then she'll have to choose the best ones. (Her choices here will both deter­
mine and depend on her research, as discussed in the next section.) These reasons will
be arguments, whose conclusion is "I should donate blood." .Arguments give reasons argument A claim backed by
reasons-logic and evidence-in
and evidence, and Danielle has several choices. She can choose examples as evidence: support of a specific conclusion.

Here is a person who was saved by donated blood.

She can make public arguments:
Donating blood is an important public service.
You or someone you love might be in an accident some day, and you want
make sure the local hospital has a ready supply of your blood type.
She can also present arguments based on emotion:
When one of your family members is hurt, there is nothing more com­
forting than knowing that there is an army of volunteers who are
there to support you, even though they don't know you, because they
were willing to give the gift of their blood.
Danielle should brainstorm many arguments from which to choose the ones that
her audience is most likely to understand and that connect to them the best. She may
have to confront the fact that her reasons for donating blood may not be the same as
the audience's reasons. She can choose to use any, all, or none of the following brain­
stormed reasons to make her case:
• It's fun!
• You can help others.
• You have an obligation to help.
• The blood bank needs you.
• Other people will need your help.
• Sick people need your help.
• It's easy.
• You'll feel great about yourself after you do it.
• There's no risk in giving blood.
• What if you needed blood?

CHAPTER 1 • PUBLIC SPEAKING •

 Wlrnt will hl'lp her choose among these? She'll need to select the arguments most
l'rfl'rLlw, with the particular audience/public she has chosen to address. Even if there
arl' many good reasons to do something, the y aren't equally good to everyone. If she
has chosen to addressher aucUe nce as college students, which of these arguments Will
m an lhe most Lo them as •ollege students? The ones about idealism? Community?
Ease of glvlng? We'll return to these questions in the chapter on persuasion and dis-
u show reasoning will help make this choice.

. . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . ... .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . . ... . . . .. . .. .... . .. .... .. . .. .. ... ......

Research (Chapter 8)
Once Danielle has chosen lines of argument, she'll need to do some research to find
th facts and information that will fill out her reasoning. She could, of course, just get
up and freestyle her speech, but this would be a failure of her responsibility to her
audience. To become thoroughly informed, Danielle needs a research strategy: She
needs to figure out where the best sources are and then read enough of the literature
on blood donation to make some reasoned conclusions. In order to do this, she'll
need to have an organized approach to research that evaluates multiple perspectives,
instead of just cutting and pasting from a discussion board or a wiki.
Danielle has an enormous variety of sources to choose from: interviews, news
stories, pamphlets, journal articles, web pages, Wikipedia, books, and so on. But she
needs carefully choose her sources and allow the audience to evaluate their credibil­
ity. She also needs to use the research responsibly, offering as full a picture of the facts
as possible. Her speech will be more effective if all the statistics are from credible
sources, such as the American Red Cross or the American Medical .Association, than
from something like www.saveavampiregiveblood.
Good research makes Danielle more credible, and it can give her more choices
about how to present her reasoning. But most importantly, research fulfills the trust
she wants the audience to place in her. If she says that donation is safe, she needs to
have the research to back that up.

···································································· ····················· ··· ·

■ Organizing (Chapter 9)
Once Danielle has chosen her arguments and assembled research to support them,

-
she is ready to choose how to organize her speech. This happens at two levels. First,
she has to decide the best order for her two or three main arguments. Perhaps civic

-
_ ...
�,,.._.ledow,t�/

+ Amerlc.,n
:!:) RedCross
-·'
'··•
loam about
Blood
Hotting•
I Blood onvo
I Voluntoer

I
For Ho1plt.llt

-
Emergency need for
blood donors now
tlcnllora .. d:Mr'lrncnfWI 10p,t:e't

......�--·
a:n::a .. CO..-, �.,!O,(DJ..,..,

,_,__
�d tb:Jdlwt� Ya1dlnlbla
Persuasive speakers know
they must rely only on
credible sources to back up RaitN:P,..,,.,.•�llll'Mf1IDDCIShotll99IEJlgiiN!y� < D 2 J 4 >

---
their words. The American
CII<.-••------..----­
--·
Red Cross website, for

===-·.::::.
Al About Blood Donation
instance, is a reliable source
for information about blood I ... ,_ ..
donation.

• PART ONE • FUNDAMENTALS OF GOOD SPEAKING

du()· · her SU'Ongest �nL if people fear · or neE!Clies. need
to focus on that first in order 10 deaT a� rm5WlOO�!IOOttn,;es..
members may not be able to hear her pow--erful argumen mic duty because
they are thinking. 6'\'ai1! Isn·, this dangerous?"'
Second, she h&5 lo decide how- to structure the body of the speed:a. llrlm . the
best order for her points? If the most impommt one goes which one is mosl a.
portant. How are the points related to each other'? Their relationships (for examplle.
just another� or cause and effect) will heJp her choose dear ba»«sili-415 betweE!ll
the poin which will help the audience wlderstand her argmnem more: pn,ciselJ.
She also needs to decide ho · to frame the speech in the introdoctioo and �
· on. The introduction will, in a sense, introduce the audience members to themsd"'es
and also set the tone for the speech while previewing the ;ugmoet!ts. 1be condusiua � and CDndusion.
will bring the arguments together in an appeal for action.
The first few sentences basically lay out the relationship between speakei; audi­
ence and topic. Look at some possibilities and what they are likely to me.an to the
audience:
1. If yon give blood I could win a prize in a competition my sorority
is having.
Meaning lo audience: The blood donation is a means for the speaker t;o benefit_
2. ff yon give bloo� the survivo:rs of the recent disaster will do
much better.
Meaning w <mdience: The donation will help others.
3. ff you give blood, you'll feel great about yours� proud of your
engageme nt.
Meaning w a:udience: The donation will he]p the audience membe1s.
Danielle needs to choose a frame that will effectively mJ:roduee her arguments
to the audience, so it needs to be consistent with them. Introduction 1 wouldn't work
with a speech that was mainly about altrnistic reasons for audience members to give
blood. fu a speech that focused on how blood donations help others, the conclusion
would need to support the frame by providing a vivid example of someone whose life
was saved or improved thanks to donated blood

■ Finding the Words (Chapter 10)

An important set of choices involves the words that Danielle will use when she speaks.
ot every single word, but the key tenns that connect her and the topic to the audi­
ence. For example, what is the subject of the speech? It's about blood (which is intrin­
sically gross to a lot of people), and she is asking her audience to do something with
the blood. But what'? Is it

a donation?
agift?
a contribution?
Of course, these words have similar meanings, but they have slightly different
implications. Contribution suggests a group effort, whereas donation makes the
blood sound equivalent to money (and the common metaphor for the place where the
blood is stored a blood "bank"). Gift is an emotionally and culturally charged term that
seems more personal than the others; people who have never made a donation or con­
tribution in their life know all about gifts. The right word would depend on the frame
of the speech and the choices Danielle has ma.de about her arguments.

CHAPTER 1 • PUBLIC SPEAKING •

 l.hal blood ,:J,�..,.
� rr another x.amp . what words could [)anieOe use lO sa
a •gooo- thing?

worthy excellent
valuable tionorable
neoessan
, helpful
commendabl e adJ1lirable
splendid cool
marvelous really fine
precious awesome
This may seem like too man choic.eS, but spending some time choosing die lhr':$:
or four ke y terms in the speech will help you get the parts o f your � trJ h,N!
together. In addition, it can also help you set the tone o f the speech- otice, fur �£­
ample, that the choices at th e end of the list are much more inform.al and slangy tlt:z
°'
the earlier ones. In some situations, this might be appropriate; in others it m ight �
be-depending on the choice of audience and frame.
l see in Chapter 10- n�
Language choices can go well be yond vocabulary, as we'l
include uses of language such as metaphor and other tropes. An exciting or appropn..
ate metaphor, such as Martin Luth.er King's "fve been to the monntaintop ," can easilj·
pull t.ogether a whole speech and help the audience not only understand it but r�
ber it as well
Suppose that Danielle has decided that the right fra me and audience for thi,,
speech is that students sho uld see themselves as members of a larger conummity and
take some responsibility for what happens in that community. One choice that wouki
help her t.o express this idea vividly t.o the audience would be a figu re of speech th.at
makes the plastic bag of donated blood a symbol for community itself-"This is corr,..
munity in a pint-sized bag." The complexities of public health problems and the VQl­
unteer blood donation system can be redu ced t.o the image of the bag itself, allowinf
students to imagine their connection t.o the larger community when they imagine thf­
bag. Rather than being scary or icky, the bag of blood becomes a symbol of hoJ>!
and commitment.

Giving Your First Speech

Danielle, like most people, imagines that the hardest part of the process is deliver­
ing the speech. As we'll discuss later, that's probably not true-though it is true that
people worry about it the most!

.................................. . ..................................................... ....

■ Delivering the Speech (Chapter 11)
Many of Danielle's choices about delivery involve how she will prepare and practice
the speech. She'll have to decide if it will be extemporaneous (spoken from notes)
or written out and either read or memorized (the more difficult options). Once she
decide s on a type of preparation, she'll have to practice it, either by herself or in
front of a small, friendly audience, thinking especially about staying within her al­
lotted time.
Of course, delivery matters. Danielle will want to deliver her speech clearly, not
too fast or slow, and with appropriate feeling and emphasis. In Chapter 11, we'll talk
about how to practice your speeches and refine all these elements.

• PART ONE • FUNDAMENTALS OF GOOD SPEAKING

..............................................................................................
■ Overcoming Anxiety (Chapter 11)
Anxiety will probably be a problem for Danielle, as it is for everyone, including some
of the most seasoned speakers. Though we will address this topic in greater detail in
Chapter 11, for your first speech in public speaking class, you can remind yourself that
your classmates are in the same boat as you, and you can focus on the all the prepara­
tion that you have done and just let the speech give itself.
. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . . .............. . .. . .. . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
■ Presentation Aids (Chapter 12)
Danielle knows that her audience will appreciate visual images or media accompany­
ing her speech. She may decide to bring some pictures or to use a program like Power­
Point to highlight important points, display graphics, and show images. First, she will
have to consider a number of logistical issues, especially whether the setting is media
fliendly one. Danielle will have to decide just how image-lich she wants her presenta­
tion to be. If she uses too many images, props, or slides, the audience may either feel
overwhelmed or may be distracted from what she is trying to say. If she relies too
much on the images or media, she is at risk of letting the media use her instead of us­
ing the media to enhance her speech. She will have to decide what images and text en­
hance her message and what ones drown it out. We will discuss these issues at length
in Chapter 12, with the goal of giving you some ways to manage visuals in your speech.

If all this seems like a lot to think about in preparing a speech, keep in mind that
we'll give you techniques for breaking the process into easy, manageable steps. More­
over, if Danielle does all these things, she will not only have the confidence in her
speech that she needs to counteract her anxiety, but she is also likely to give a power­
ful and effective speech. Even better, Danielle's speaking abilities will improve with
every speech that she composes using this process-as will your speaking abilities.
The skills that Danielle is honing in making a speech about giving blood will help her
in the future, preparing her to make the kind of speeches that will change her personal
history for the better, and perhaps make a difference in the lives of those around her.

Scientific Studies I (9th grade)!

Algebra I/Integrated Phystc8-& Chai

Scient.ific Students II (lotll-lltb,­

Al.gebra 2/ Physics

Teachin�
1 Malh teachet" / l Scieuoe te�

Weekly Meeting times:

75 min. 3x

Visual aids are often

helpful in emphasizing your
important points when used
effectively.

CHAPTER 1 • PUBLIC SPEAKING •

Mal<ing Responsible Choices
LC't's bring t he co n epts and process es of this chapte r to gethe r. What you learn in a
pub lic speaking course is ho w to make good com mun ication choices_ and how to tak e
responsibility for them. Our i m in this book is to expand the choices you have in
a
speaking an d give you more and better ways of makin g those choices, enabling You to
taJ<e responsibility for them .

•• •• • ••• •• • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ •• ••• •••• •••••••••• •• ••

Good Speeches Are the Result of Choices

•• • • •• • • •
• • •••
•• •

What's a good speech? When the speaker is free from nervousness? When it gets big
applause at the end? Most people imagine a good speech has something to do With
gett ing what you want or transmitting information properly or getting the audience
to think as you do. Although these outcomes may happen, they don't by thems e1ves
define good communication.
"Good communication " is a bit ambiguous, because it is pulled between choices
that are practically good (they are effective in persuading your audience, getting What
you want in the short run) and choices that are good because they are responsible
(they are what you would want if you were in the audience). The best communica­
tors make choices about how to write and deliver a speech that are both practically
effective and ethically responsible. Respo nsible and ethical, for this context, are inter­
twined-taking responsibility for your choices is an ethical stance. Thus, your com­
municative ethics are revealed in the choices that you make in crafting a persuasive
speech as well as the choices that you make in terms of your orientation to your audi­
ence (the kind of relationship are you creating with them as you step up to speak).
There are many possible good relationships with an audience. They depend on the
specific case, and a good persuader can tell the difference between an appropriate and
inappropriate approach. So, good rhetoric, or good communication, is actually pretty
straightforward (though not simple in practice). It's about making choices and being will­
ing to take responsibility for them. The responsible and ethical speaker chooses the ap­
propriate goals for the audience and situation and the appropriate means to achieve those
goals. In this sense, the story of Danielle serves as an example of what a speaker needs
to do to give a good speech: making the best choices for the audience and the situation.

······················································································· · ·· ..
■ Taking Responsibility Means Respecting
the Audience
Rhetoric and persuasion get a bad name when they are used irresponsibly-when
the means or the goals disrespect the audience, ignore their interests ' or treat them
as less than fully rational participants in the process. There's a simple way to prevent
these abuses: Be ready to take responsibility for your choices. Imagine, at any point
in a speech, someone in the audience asking, "Why did you say that? Argue that? Use
that metaphor? Organize your speech that way?" If you can give an answer, then you're
taking responsibility. If y ou can't, then you are not living up to the requirements of
public persuasion.
Many people find ways to reject responsibility for their own talk. Here are a few:
• Well, I don't know why I said that-it seemed OK to me.
• Oh, I hoped you weren't going to notice that.
• One of my sources argued that, so why not?
• It seemed like the only way to do it.

KING
• PART ONE • FUNDAMENTALS OF GOOD SPEA
 • The materiaJ just seemed lo rf:'quire this presentation style.
• Everybody does it this way.
• It's just conventional lo say that-who cares'?
• It's the tmth.
• There isn't any other way to say it.
If you're not taking responsibility, then either you don't respect your audience
or you don't care about being effective. Respecting the intelligence of the audience
and treating their potential points of disagreement respectfully is an impor tant part
of persuasion and will make your speech more successful. As we pointed out earlier,
the "public" part of public speech is connected with the best ideas of democracy, and
democracy requires respect for disagreement.

Summary
Let's put it all together: public and speaking. Public speaking is powerful because it is
communicating with other people in a way that respects their interests and also holds
open the possibility of change. Speech changes society and can change your life as
well. Public speaking addresses other people not only as individuals but also as mem­
Access an interactive
bers of a public, as fellow citizens in a democracy, as people motivated by common
eBook, chapter-specific
interests. Public speaking is deliberative, which means that the goal of a public speech
interactive learning tools,
is to create knowledge, to make better and more well-informed decisions about issues
including flashcards,
of common concern. Finally, public speakers make choices and take responsibilities
quizzes, videos and
for them; they make choices about content, organization, words, delivery, and visual
more in your Speech
aids to create a compelling speech.
Communication
CourseMate for Public
QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW Speaking,accessed
through CengageBrain.com.
1. Why will it benefit you to become a better public speaker?
2. Why does public speaking matter?
3. What's the relationship between preparation and performance?
4. What are the elements in a good public speech? What does a speaker have to think
about in preparing a speech?
5. What does the idea of "public" mean in public speaking?
6. What is communication? What distinguishes public speaking from communication
more generally?
7. How is public speaking related to democracy and to civic life?
8. How do speakers take responsibility for their choices?

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION

1. How do you think public speaking will make a difference to your life, both as a
speaker and an audience?
2. Can public speaking's connection to democracy extend to everyday speeches, es­
pecially in business and personal settings?
3. What are examples of irresponsible speech? What are the negative effects of irre­
sponsible speech?
4. In your opinion, what makes a speech succeed or fail? What makes one speech
persuasive and another fall flat?
5. Do you think the idea of a public is relevant in our current political and social situ­
ation? Is it too idealistic? Can one individual make a difference in public life?

CHAPTER 1 • PUBLIC SPEAKING G

Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
of the fact that the judge had the power to imprison, suffering as they
were, never would they have consented to a verdict in favor of the
prosecution. Another distinguished juror, W. L. Young, on the case,
on seeing the defendant coming from the court-room, met him with
all the warmth of genuine friendship and the most sincere of
emotion, sympathy, and contrition, which will be best understood in
his own words: “My dear sir, my feelings are deeply wounded, and I
feel as though I have committed a very great wrong in giving consent
against my better judgment—a wrong even to fine you so much as
one single cent, and were the case to be done over again, with the
light now before me, I would most assuredly act quite differently, for I
now see my great error, though my greatest grief is that this lesson
was taught too late to be of any service to you in your present
humiliated situation.” The reply was suitable, and in these words:
“Permit me, sir, to acknowledge your truly sympathetic
manifestations with all the welcomeness and gratitude which are
possible to be expressed; and also to further express to you that
notwithstanding this heavy stroke of adversity, I will endeavor to bear
the same with philosophical fortitude, under the strengthening
conviction that this is the most memorable epoch of life, and in spite
of malignant persecution, justice will afterwards be done, and time
will bring forth its appropriate reward.”

FAILURE OF PETITION—RECEIVES THE KINDEST TREATMENT

WHILE IN PRISON.

Immediately after the sentence, the citizens of Mobile prepared

and sent a petition to His Excellency, Governor Moore, of the State
of Alabama, containing the signatures of over six hundred of the best
citizens of Mobile, praying for the release of the defendant, but the
Governor declined to grant the request because the petition was not
signed by the presiding judge.
But the sheriff of the city, Hon. James T. Shelton, must not be
overlooked. His conduct in behalf of the defendant was noble and
magnanimous in the extreme. All that one man could do to alleviate
the rust and monotony of confinement, was gracefully and cheerfully
done by him. His friendship—his whole-souled treatment reached to
an extent not to be surpassed by any. Hospitalities at his own
mansion in profusion, a separate parlor well furnished with books of
every description, and in everything else well fitted up in the utmost
order of elegance and taste; no restraint whatever, beyond what the
law required—having the whole limits, for exercise and recreation, of
the prison boundaries; all such conveniences and comforts were
freely and lavishly bestowed; and for which a lasting gratitude is due
to the memory of the departed James T. Shelton.
Numerous other visitors, of both sexes, came to render all the
comfort which humanity could afford. These visits were sincere,
friendly, and consoling, indeed; in short, everything which could be
done to remove dullness and make the time glide away agreeably,
was done with cheerfulness and with truly natural fervor of heart.
Time did not hang heavily; but passed away briefly—a time which
can now be referred to with pride and satisfaction.

THE CLAN GROVELLINGLY PENETRATES PRIVATE

TRANSACTIONS.

The defendant, at the time of his arrest, was engaged to be

married on the 22d of March following, to Miss Julia Pauline Bowen,
daughter of Rev. P. P. Bowen, of Ocean Springs, Miss., but having
become entangled in severe law difficulties, the appointed time for
the consummation of this engagement was, from necessity,
indefinitely prolonged. During this time, and more especially while
confined in prison, the fact of such engagement became generally
known. Malicious propensities could not be gratified enough by what
had already been done, and by the little persecution then enduring,
but the baneful malignity even extended to private and domestic
arrangements. Some one in Mobile, over the signature of Amogene
Colfax, addressed quite a lengthy communication to Miss Bowen.
This communication pretended to have emanated from a female
friend, the real object of which was evidently to poison and prejudice
the mind to an extent sufficient to mar the existing engagement, and
finally to break up all further considerations of the matter with a view
to bring on a reaction of public prejudice to take the place of public
sympathy, which was then running in favor of the defendant. But few
have any adequate conception of the heights and depths of infamy
which the clan could reach for the accomplishment of its infernal
designs. But in this instance all such designs proved signally
abortive, as will be satisfactorily understood by reading Miss
Bowen’s reply to a communication from the defendant while in
prison.
It is very much to be regretted that the letter with the fictitious
signature of Amogene Colfax has been misplaced or lost. Its
appearance in this work would be valuable by the way of giving
some idea of the clan’s complicated machinations; however, Miss
Bowen’s reply will afford information enough to satisfy that she was
far beyond the reach of influences which contemplated the ruin of
both. Piety, firmness and devoted sincerity are conspicuous in every
line of the reply. Let the reader now judge for himself:

MISS BOWEN’S LETTER.

Ocean Springs, Miss., March 16, 1859.

J. R. S. Pitts, Esq., Mobile, Ala.:
Esteemed Friend—Happy indeed am I to have the pleasure of
acknowledging the reception of your kind favor bearing date 12th
instant, the contents of which are so consoling and interesting that I
feel entirely inadequate to the task of making the properly deserving
reply.
This is the first intelligence I have had from you by letter since I
heard of the last unfortunate results of your trial. Ever since the
reception of this sad news my mind has been a complete wreck.
Both mental and physical strength have visibly declined under the
pressure of contemplated burdens which you had to bear; but the
relief which this, your last letter, has afforded is beyond the powers
of description.
 In the first stages every effort was made to conceal a wounded
heart, but in vain; the countenance of sorrow was too plainly
depicted to be mistaken by those around who are acquainted with
former cheerfulness. Laboring under pungent affliction from the silent
meditation of your melancholy situation, none but myself can have
any correct idea of the internal struggles with which I was
contending. Under such a compression of the vital powers, earthly
scenes had no charms for me; but the wings of last night’s mail bore
the glad tidings from you that all is well, leaving you comfortably
situated and cared for in every respect, which affords me the most
exquisite relief. From gloom and despair to joy and hope, the
transition was rapid and sudden. The following from your pen affords
a satisfaction which words are incapable of representing:
“You will please give yourself no uneasiness of mind so far as
regards my comfort and well-being. My friends here have situated
me as agreeably in every respect as I could possibly have desired.
Perfectly composed and resigned myself, I want you to share the
same, if possible, in a still higher degree.”
All of us, well knowing your entire innocence, deeply sympathize
with you; and, as for my own part, this ordeal has only been a trial of
my devotion—not knowing before the real depth of affection, which is
now more strengthened and indelibly fixed on thee. Fictitious
signatures cannot avail, nor indeed any other cunningly devised
schemes for the interruption of the peaceful concord which has so
long been maintained between us.
Even a brief narration of little ordinary simplicities may sometimes
be enjoyed by minds accustomed to higher ranges of thought, and
which frequently soar to loftier spheres of the grander
contemplations of nature’s wonderful works. Accordingly you will be
disposed to pardon anything which you may here find apparently of a
light and frivolous character.
There is nothing new in our village that could, I presume, be of
interest to you, unless accounts of frequent marriages would have
this effect. In affairs of this sort there has been almost an epidemic.
We have had quite an inclement change in the weather for this
season of the year. It is just now very cold, lowering, and quite
unpleasant indeed; but the joyous cheerfulness manifested by the
little birds indicate the early dawn of spring.
There is a charming lovely little mocking bird that makes frequent
visits near my window—sings so sweetly, and seems to enjoy life
with the utmost fulness of felicity, so much so that I am, in a doleful
hour, sometimes inclined to envy the happiness which I cannot at all
times share myself. Its warbling melodies echoing as they are wafted
along on the zephyrs of the morning and renewed again toward the
evening shades, sometimes excite peculiar reflections, which are
very wrong to indulge in. I ought to be content with my lot, though it
may seem rather hard, yet, perhaps, all for the best. The
dispensations of Providence cannot be otherwise; and it is vain to
repine against what we do not understand sufficiently. It is true my
pathway has been interspersed with many difficulties and heart-
rending trials from my earliest childhood; and they seem to still follow
me up to the present day. But of what use to murmur? He who has
blessed me with innumerable favors will do all things well. “He who
has been with and comforted in the sixth trouble, will not forsake in
the seventh.”
I fear you will think me enthusiastic on the subject of religion, but
hope not. All written has been sincerely felt; and were it not for the
comfort of religion hardly one happy moment would I enjoy.
Oppressed and fatigued, I can go to Him who hath said, “Come unto
me and find rest for your wearied soul.”
The family desire a united remembrance to you. Pardon error, and
believe as ever,
Yours, etc., Pauline.

DR. BEVELL’S LETTER TO MISS BOWDEN.

This is, perhaps, the proper place for the insertion of Dr. Bevell’s
letter to Miss Bowen. It contains important matter of a public nature,
which will again have to be referred to in the subsequent comments
which are to follow. Let it be carefully read:
 April 12, 1859.
Miss J. P. Bowen, Ocean Springs, Miss.:
Excuse me, an entire stranger to you, for the liberty and freedom I
take in addressing you. Although, personally, we are unacquainted
yet my sympathies are with you and your unfortunate intended. I
formed his acquaintance in Augusta, Miss., while he was engaged in
writing the confessions of Copeland—the cause of his present unjust
imprisonment. Although he is in prison, and redeeming an unjust
sentence, his friends have not deserted him, as is too often the case,
but visit him regularly and inquire after his welfare with the greatest
anxiety, and endeavor to administer to his every want and comfort.
His friends, though numerous previous to his trial, have greatly
increased in number since. We have made an effort to limit his
imprisonment through the pardoning power of Governor Moore, by
an article addressed to him in the shape of a petition, with about six
hundred signatures of the most responsible citizens of Mobile; but in
this we have failed, and, to my deepest regret, he will have to serve
his time out.
We first drew up a petition to Judge McKinstry, signed by a
respectable number of the jury, but hearing of his negative
declarations on the street, we declined honoring him with the
request.
Although we have failed in these efforts, the conduct of all the
opposing clique strongly indicate to my mind that the principal
stringent ruling is to gratify, and sustain, and retain political influence.
The opposing party have by no means sustained itself to the world,
notwithstanding the obtaining of a forced verdict and fine in the pitiful
sum of fifty dollars, which the jurors are determined shall not come
out of Colonel Pitts’ pocket. The Colonel has the sympathy of the
principal citizens of Mobile; and, among that number, almost, if not
quite, the entire portion of the gentler sex; and as long as he has
those amiable creatures advocating his cause he is free from all
censure and harm. He was extremely unfortunate in not being able
to prove certain facts on his trial that have since almost revealed
themselves. I think myself they have seriously regretted the past and
present daily expositions. Colonel Pitts is as comfortably situated as
possible under the circumstances. He has the entire liberty of the
prison bounds, with no restraint whatever on his person or actions—
sharing freely the hospitality of our inestimable Sheriff and family. He
has an excellent little parlor, well fitted up for convenience and
comfort.
I was one of the unfortunate jurors who tried the case, and from
my observations prior to, and during the progress of the trial, in my
humble opinion he met with strenuous ruling and injustice. Yet he
bore all with that fortitude and patience that ever characterizes a
truly good man; and, since his confinement, appears to be
composed and resigned to his fate. This has had a tendency to
influence a favorable impression in his behalf among the citizens of
Mobile. His friends in Mississippi, who are very numerous, are very
much incensed against the Court, and manifested their indignation
by public declarations in their public newspapers. His greatest grief
and mortification are in your behalf. He suffers more on your account
than he does on his own. He has daily the fullest assurance and
confirmation of the kindest feelings of our best people. And what
more could he want? It is looked on as one of those misfortunes
incident in life that sometimes cannot be avoided honorably, and the
only chance is to brave the storm fearlessly until a more congenial
sun will burst forth to his advantage, which will be better appreciated
and enjoyed had he never been in prison. I do hope you have
firmness and decision enough to fast adhere in adversity—spurning
the advice of those who would attempt to prejudice you against him.
Sympathizing with him under the clouds of misfortune, rejoicing with
him in prosperity, and yet be happy together; and may you both live,
not to exult, but witness the repentance of your enemies, is the
desire of your well wisher.
Very respectfully, yours,
John A. Bevell.
Miss Bowen availed herself of the very earliest opportunity to
acknowledge and to reply to this valuable communication, in which
will be found some statements well worthy of record.
 MISS BOWEN’S REPLY TO DR. BEVELL’S LETTER.

Ocean Springs, Miss., April 16, 1859.

Dr. John A. Bevell, Mobile, Ala.:
Sir:—I am in receipt of yours, bearing date 12th inst., and sensibly
feel the loss of suitable language for a correct expression of what is
due for your inestimable favor. It has been read with intense interest.
It came at the opportune moment when most needed, and contains
matter which to me is of the highest earthly treasure, and for which
the ordinary returns of gratitude are but a faint expression of the true
estimation entertained in my own mind.
To learn from one so competent to furnish correct information of
the easy and comfortable situation of my much esteemed friend, Mr.
P., is gratifying in the extreme. At first, imagination had drawn
pictures too darkly of him being immured in solitary confinement
where the cheering rays of solid friendship could not penetrate. How
agreeably I have been disappointed. Your communication has
completely dispelled for the future all such illusory apprehensions.
Friends numerous, and sympathy not confined to narrow limits, with
an abundant plenty of everything else calculated to alleviate the
misfortunes of a temporary exile.
But allow me to confess to you that the recent trial, with its
apparently sad results, has with me in no wise made the slightest
change deleterious to the future interest and happiness of my friend.
Previous to this memorable event in his life, with him I had pledged
for an early approach to the hymeneal altar, and was fully satisfied
then that he was, in every respect, worthy of such a pledge of
confidence; and if his merit were deserving the same in that day,
they are certainly, in my opinion, more so to day.
As yet I have not heard a single word uttered that does not fully
justify Mr. P’s action in giving publicity to the history of Copeland.
The public good of his country demanded such action from him.
Bearing in mind such circumstances, I could not, with any degree of
consistency, suffer myself for a moment to be biased or influenced
by out-siders, and, more especially, by those who are violently
antagonist against the author for doing that which ought to be
received by the public generally as a great blessing to society.
You will please do me the kindness at your earliest convenience to
inform Mr. P. not to suffer himself to be in the least troubled on my
account, nor to entertain any doubt of my unswerving constancy. In
this respect, perhaps I am endowed with as much stability as any,
and as much as he can desire.
Although heretofore strangers, nevertheless, I hold to be much
indebted for the warm interest you have taken in behalf of my friend,
and indeed mutually so of both.
Very respectfully, etc.,
J. P. Bowen.
From every creditable source, profuse attentions had entered
through all avenues of the prison wall; and now the defendant’s time
for which he had been sentenced was about to expire, preparations
were immediately made to honor him with a “reception committee” to
greet him from the narrow limits to the realms of liberty, where dwells
the broad expanse of earth and sky. Confinement had not corroded
the soul’s finer parts; and to show how devoid his mind was of every
semblance of prejudice or malignity, a brief extract from his address
delivered on that occasion when emerging from his sentence
bounds, will be read with some degree of interest.

AN EXTRACT FROM THE SPEECH OF THE DEFENDANT

BEFORE THE COMMITTEE.

“Gentlemen, at this proud moment, the breath of liberty is

refreshing. From an incarceration so unjust, you welcome me back
to freedom with as much joy as I can possibly experience myself at
this instant of time. Rather as a very much persecuted individual
than a criminal do you this day consider me. For this demonstration
of your kindly sentiments, as well as on all other occasions, my
gratitude is tendered in profusion. What is it that can not be endured
while being surrounded with friends so devoted and sincere? The
reception you have seen proper to give me, removes all doubts as to
the manner I will be met by other circles of my fellow beings. Well do
I know how hastily judgment is often pronounced without sufficiently
discriminating betwixt guilt and innocence. This morning I leave the
precincts of prison unconscious of any wrong by me committed, but,
on the contrary, am strongly impressed with the convictions that I
have materially served my country by giving publicity to the career of
a band of men who, for years, held whole States in absolute terror.
For this I have suffered, but do not repine, because time, the great
friend of truth, must eventually triumph. From prison I come not forth
burning with vindictive or revengeful feelings against any.
Notwithstanding the wrongs endured, I have passed in my own heart
an act of amnesty so far as private considerations are concerned,
and whatever course may be marked out for the future, only the
public good will, in this respect, afford me any interest for
subsequent pursuit. To you, and to other large bodies of respectable
citizens of Mobile, for petitioning the Governor for pardon, although a
failure, yet equally do I return thanks for the best of intentions as
though they had been perfectly successful.”
Immediately after his release, letters of condolence and
congratulations, from distant parts, and almost from every direction
poured in. One in particular from a friend in Gonzales, Texas, will
also be read with more than ordinary interest. Its spirit and intention
were to impel him forward to higher achievements of fame and utility.

A LETTER FROM A FRIEND IN TEXAS AFTER DEFENDANT’S

RELEASE.

Gonzales, Texas, Dec. 30, 1859.

Dr. J. R. S. Pitts, Medical College, Ala.:
“Dear Sir:—In the sunshine of prosperity, friends will crowd
around like bees on the honey-comb, but when the lowering clouds
of adversity appear, there are but few who will not be found among
the ranks of deserters, your case, however, forms an exception to
the general rule. You have been favored by the benign and
exhilarating influences of fortune; and you have also experienced the
dark and bitter reverses with which humanity is so often saturated. At
one time, she has thrown around you a joyous halo of felicity—at
another time she has forsaken you with a treacherous inconstancy;
but amid all her various phases of change which you have endured,
the sympathy and good-will of every honest heart has beat high in
your behalf. Your vile prosecutors succeeded by miserable
subterfuges of law, which involved you in serious pecuniary
embarrassments, and consigned you within the dreary walls of
confinement, but time is now doing justice both to you and to them.
You are mounting up into a brighter—a purer atmosphere of public
estimation, while they are descending as rapidly into the dark
abodes of eternal execration.
No one can feel more elated, or more disposed to congratulate
you on anything pertaining to your interest, happiness, and success
than myself; and certainly none more willing to contribute at every
opportunity all within the power of one individual to your permanent
gratification: how could it be otherwise? I have known you long; a
chain of unbroken friendship has ever continued betwixt us; and
more than all, I am proud in the contemplation that I have had some
share in your early education.
Your attention is now directed towards the medical profession; and
here I can express a few words of encouragement without acting
derogatory to the principles of rectitude or sincerity; for if thinking
otherwise, most certainly would I prefer the task of assisting at the
risk of displeasing you.
The medical profession affords a fine scope for the developement
of every faculty belonging to the human soul. Man, “the image of
God,” is the most wonderful and complicated machine in the
universe. Here is the noblest of all subjects—vast, boundless, and
inexhaustible. Here is a theme on which the finest geniuses of the
world have been engaged: a theme in connection with which the
accumulation of intellectual wealth and constant progression have
been marching onward with giant strides from the commencement of
man’s mundane existence; yet but little hope—but little prospect of
ever reaching perfection; hence the encouragement for onward
acquisition for further triumphs of science.
 Knowledge is valuable only in proportion to its applicability for
preventing or alleviating the sufferings of humanity; then where is the
avocation more adapted to better accord with this sentiment than the
medical profession? Of course, I exclude all consideration in
reference to the many quacks, empirics and murderers, who assume
the medical garb without the least sign of internal qualification.
There is nothing in all the wide diversified forms of creation that
can give you such lofty conceptions of the attributes of the Deity as
the study of man: Life’s warm stream which ramifies and circulates in
processes so wonderful; the numerous heterogeneous fluids which
are secreted from it to answer all the astounding purposes of
systematical economy with the nicest of all exactness; and all this by
a “vital principle” which none can define, but which serves very well
to represent our ignorance; the almost countless numbers of self-
acting—self-propelling powers, with multitudes of valves, hinges,
joints, all working in the grandest of earthly harmony; these are
mechanical operations which belong to the Deity, and mock the
proudest of all efforts in vain imitation. But what are these in
comparison to the human mind—this noble prerogative of man? It is
this which makes him the “lord of creation,” and draws the broad line
of distinction betwixt himself and the lower order of creation. It is to
this we are indebted for the manifold wheels, springs and levers
which carry society along; in short the moral transactions of this
revolving globe owe their origin and continuance to its agency. The
science of medicine comprises a considerable knowledge of the
whole. To understand any one business well, we must have much
information on the relation of many. The study of causes and effects
of physical phenomena, as well as the faculties, sentiments, and
propensities of the human soul, are all within your province. But
without enlarging, enough has been written to urge and animate you
on in the work you have so well begun.”
The most remarkable action of any executive was that of the
Governor of Mississippi in giving assistance to the “clan” in its
expiring throes, whether intentionally or unintentionally, is not
material now to enquire. From this action alone, but few are
incapable of understanding, to some extent, the influence which
wealth and distinction can exercise in cases, no matter how
depraved they may be. This is only one instance from incalculable
numbers which might be adduced where even the highest
departments of State can be made subservient to vitiated purposes.

A LETTER TAKEN FROM THE “TRUE DEMOCRAT.”

The following was published in the True Democrat, from the pen of
one of the ablest Judges in the eastern part of Mississippi, shortly
after the liberation of the defendant:
Mr. Editor—We heartily sympathize with J. R. S. Pitts, Sheriff of
Perry county, and are deeply mortified at the yielding course of our
Governor in rendering him up a prisoner in obedience to a requisition
from the State of Alabama. We look on this whole affair as being
preposterous in the extreme. To have the Sheriff of one of our
counties forced to vacate his office, temporarily, and to be taken like
a common felon, and carried to another State, and there be tried as
a malefactor, and for what? Why, for simply writing and publishing
the confessions of a notorious “land pirate,” one of a gang of banditti
that has till recently been a terror to the whole country for a great
many years. Such a course betrays a feebleness of nerve on the
part of his Excellency perfectly unpardonable in the Executive.
The “Wages and Copeland Clan” have become as notorious in
portions of Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana and Texas, as was the
pirate and robber, John A. Murrell, and his clan. It is well for Mr. Pitts
that his friends volunteered to guard him and protect him until he
reached the city of Mobile in safety.
Talk about rendering him up on a requisition that claimed him as a
“fugitive from justice,” when the offence, if any, was committed in this
State, when he was a citizen of Perry county, and Sheriff of the
county at the time, and quietly at home discharging the duties of his
office. “Oh! shame, where is thy blush?”
But we rejoice to learn that his prosecutors have failed to hurt him.
They may have forced him to draw heavily on his purse to fee
lawyers, pay tavern expenses, etc., but they have not hurt his
character. He stands to-day proudly vindicated as a bold and
efficient officer before an impartial and unprejudiced public. Mr. Pitts
is too well known in Mississippi for the tongue of slander or the hand
of the bitter persecutor to injure him seriously. He is a native of
Georgia—“to the manner born.” He was reared and principally
educated in Mississippi. And right in the county where he was
principally raised, he was selected by a large majority of the citizens
of the county to serve them and the State in the high and responsible
office of Sheriff of the county; and that too when he had barely
reached his majority of years. The intelligent citizens of Perry county
elected him by their spontaneous suffrage solely on account of his
great moral worth and his superior business qualifications.
The most amusing circumstance in the whole affair is, the report
industriously circulated that Mr. Pitts did not write the book—that he
is not scholar enough to write such a book. The report refutes itself
by its own palpable absurdity. Everybody who is acquainted with Mr.
Pitts knows that he is a fair English scholar, and a very good writer.
The book is a valuable book; and it has done, and will do more to rid
the country of the clan it exposes than even the killing and hanging
has done.
Mr. Pitts may congratulate himself as having done more with his
pen as an author than he did with the rope and gallows as Sheriff.
Much more might be said in vindication of this persecuted
gentleman, but this is deemed sufficient. Mr. Pitts is a young man,
and will, if he lives many years, work out a character in high social
position, and official position, too, if he seeks it. From his beginning, I
predict for him a brilliant career in the future.
Very respectfully,
Vindex.

THE CHARACTER OF THE PROSECUTOR.

The vile character of the prosecution is not yet sufficiently

understood. There is yet more to be developed. Enough has already
been brought to light to give some idea of Shoemake, one of the
main witnesses in the struggle to crush truth. Earth was never trod
by a more dangerous and despicable wretch than this. He was the
embodiment of all that was mean, cruel, bloody and horrible. How
much superior the other agent and intended witness, Bentonville
Taylor is, the reader will judge for himself from the following authentic
testimony.
The statement will be remembered in the commencing part of the
proceedings of the trial that no ordinary amount of astonishment was
experienced by the defendant when Bentonville Taylor was called
into court as one of the principal witnesses for the prosecution. The
defendant well knowing the character of this man, he lost no time for
getting the most substantial of testimony touching his notorious
reputation. This testimony has been held in reserve up to the present
period for reasons which will be given presently.
In Shoemake’s evidence, the prosecution sustained such an
overwhelming defeat that it refrained from calling up another of the
same type for that time. As before stated, Bentonville Taylor was
brought from Williamsburg, Covington county, Miss. The nature of
his testimony, intended to be given in court, was immediately learned
afterward by his card published in one of the Mobile newspapers.
The substance of this card was to the effect that the names given in
the confessions were forged by the defendant, and that Copeland
himself was insane at the time he made the confessions, and the
same entirely unworthy of any credit whatever either in public or
private. It was thought at the time that Bentonville Taylor was to be
used in the other two cases of Moulton and Cleaveland against the
defendant to be afterward tried. This is one reason why the
documents pertaining to Bentonville Taylor have so long been
withheld. Another is, it is always painful, in the absence of imperative
necessity, to make public such considerations as, under other
circumstances, might be better enveloped in silence; but when
charges of forgery have been made, and that the whole confessions
are entirely unworthy of credit, then it becomes an absolute
necessity to know something of the man who has had the audacity to
make such charges.
 First will be given some extracts from a letter which was intended
for publication at the time, but on more mature thought was decided
to be suppressed for the same reasons as just given. This letter is
now in the hands of the defendant, the severer parts of which will still
be suppressed for humanity’s sake:
“Who is this Bentonville Taylor, where did he come from, and what
his character as established by himself? It seems he came to
Ellisville, Jones county, Miss., about the time or shortly after
Copeland was brought from the Alabama penitentiary to Mississippi
to be tried for the murder of Harvey—pretending then to be a Yankee
school master seeking employment—having with him a woman
whom he introduced to that community as his sister and assistant
teacher. They obtained a school; he and his sister took board in a
respectable family located in Ellisville, Mr. Parker’s. They had not
been there long before reports got out in this family of such a nature
that is perhaps improper to publish. However, Mr. Parker ordered
them to leave his house. The trustees of the school forthwith called a
meeting, which resulted in the discharge of both. They were promptly
paid off; the woman left for parts unknown, while he has been
loitering around in the adjoining counties in a way anything but
satisfactory, ever since. He got out a license to plead law, defended
Copeland in his last trial, and then was brought from Williamsburg,
Covington county, by the Mobile prosecutors, to there serve their
purposes, in the most reduced of external condition and centless, but
returned in the finest suit of attire, with plenty of money in his pocket
—the rewards of his services in Mobile for falsehood and attempted
deception. And this is the respectable lawyer from Mississippi, as
represented by one of the prosecutors. A cheaper and more
degraded instrument could not have been found in all Eastern
Mississippi. A poor subterfuge to resort to such a man to lie men out
of deserving censure. How readily it seems the prosecution knew
where to place its fingers to subserve the purpose. A few more such
licks will nail the truth of Copeland’s confessions to the cross
forever.”
But read the documents now in possession, from the best and
most respectable citizens of Jones county, about this man:
The State of Mississippi,
Perry County. }
This day personally appeared before me, A. L. Fairly, a Justice of
the Peace, in and for the said county and State aforesaid, Franklin J.
Mixon, who makes oath in due form of law, and on oath says that
Bentonville Taylor stole from this affiant a bridle and girth, while this
affiant resided in Jones county, Mississpipi, at, or near, Hoskin’s ferry
in said Jones county, in the month of March or April, 1858.
Sworn to, and subscribed before me this twelfth day of April, 1859.
A. L. Fairly, J. P., P. C.
Signed, F. J. Mixon.

State of Mississippi,
Perry County. }
I, James Carpenter, Clerk of the Probate Court of said county,
certify that A. L. Fairly, whose name is signed to the above affidavit,
was at the time of signing the same, a Justice of the Peace, in and
for said county, and that full faith and credit are due all his official
acts as such.
Given under my hand and seal of said court, this sixteenth day of
April, 1859.
James Carpenter,
Clerk Probate Court, Perry Co., Miss.

Ellisville, Jones County,

Mississippi. }
 We, the undersigned citizens of said county and State aforesaid,
do hereby certify that we are well acquainted with Bentonville Taylor,
and know him to be a man of no moral worth as a citizen, no
character as a lawyer, nor school teacher, and a man to whose word
we could not give any credence for truth and veracity.
J. L. Owen, Att’y at Law, Ellisville, Miss.
J. A. Easterling.
Norval Cooper.
S. E. Nettles, Treas. of Jones county.
F. K. Willoughby, Justice of the Peace.
Hiram Mathas.
Isaac Anderson.
M. H. Owen.
Amos J. Spears.
Richmond Anderson.
Thos. D. Dyess.
John H. Walters.
H. D. Dossett, Ex-Sheriff of said county.

State of Mississippi,
Jones County. }
I, D. M. Shows, Clerk of the Circuit and Probate Courts of said
county, do hereby certify that I believe the men whose names appear
to the foregoing annexed certificate, are men of truth and veracity.
Given under my hand and seal of office this second day of April,
1859.
D. M. Shows, Clerk of C & P. C.

Ellisville, Mississippi,
 Jones County.
}
I, E. M. Devall, Sheriff of said county and State aforesaid, do
certify that I believe that the men whose names appear to the
foregoing annexed certificate are men of truth and veracity.
Given under my hand and seal this 2d day of April, 1859.
E. M. Devall, Sheriff Jones county.

After Bentonville Taylor returned from Mobile, I saw him and told
him of the rumor that was in circulation relative to his going to Mobile
as a witness against Col. J. R. S. Pitts, and he denied emphatically
to me of having any share in the transaction, and also stated that the
aforesaid rumor was false.
[Signed.] Edward W. Goff.
The next question to be dealt with is the miserable plea of insanity,
and forged names in the confessions.
First, let the report from the inquisition jury be read, which will be
found on page 113 of this work. Again, it is well known by those who
visited Copeland in person, that there was a keenness and
shrewdness about him which distinguished him from ordinary men;
and all the promptings given to feign insanity did not amount to
anything but deserving failure. And as to the gratuitous charge of
forging names, the defendant did not know anything about them
previous to being given by Copeland. He did not know that such
names were in existence before, and of course could not forge in the
absence of all knowledge appertaining; but the conduct of the
prosecution, with hundreds of living witnesses, go, as quoted from
the letter just referred to, “to nail to the cross forever the truth of
Copeland’s confessions.”
So much for the trial in Mobile in the first case, and now for the
necessary comments to further enable the reader to comprehend the
whole.
There were two other cases on the same docket of precisely a
similar nature to the first against the defendant. For two or three
years afterward he was in regular attendance, and always ready for
trial; but the prosecution would not allow either case to come on until
known that his presence was required in the army during the war;
and then it had the cases called up, and the bonds declared
forfeited. The two cases were ordered dismissed, and, some several
years afterward, the bondsmen were finally released by the
“Commissioners of Revenue” without injury.
Nothing is plainer than of the prosecution being glad of any
plausible pretext for dismissing the cases—anything in the shape of
a convenient opportunity for relief in the awkward situation in which it
stood. Why so determined and successful to bring on instanter the
first case in spite of the most powerful reasons for a temporary
continuance? And why, when this was over, was it equally
determined and successful to ward off the two remaining cases? Is it
not evident, notwithstanding all the prostituted forces at command,
that it was unwilling to make a second experiment? But how stands
the presiding Judge affected in this slimy affair? In the first case, in
defiance of the most powerful cause assigned in favor, he would not
allow one hour of continuance of the case; but from term to term,
from year to year, he allowed the prosecution all it wanted,
regardless of all the urgent efforts of the defendant for the remaining
trials to be proceeded with to save entire ruin from excessive and
repeated expenses. But when the defendant’s absence was
compelled by demands made from the War Department, then did this
Judge allow the case to be pressed forward by the prosecution, and
the bonds declared forfeited! If this junta, or combination of Judge
with the prosecution did not exist, the plainest of all circumstantial
demonstrations are not worthy of any notice whatever. But this is
only one instance out of a number, which will be given of this Judge’s
partiality—of his palpable efforts to do violence to justice.
Again, mark his conduct in endeavoring to obtain a forced and
unnatural verdict. After twenty-four hours of close confinement, the
jury returned with the report that there was no earthly chance of