Freedom and prosperity index comparison

among 5 countries
 Term paper
Freedom and prosperity index comparison
among 5 countries

Course Code: ITB 301

Course Title: International Business
Section:02
Semester: Spring 2024

Submitted To:
Dr Jashim Uddin
Professor
Department of Business Administration,
East West University

Submitted By:
Group
Name ID Contribution
Sumaiya Chowdhury 2021-2-10-281 33.33%
Borhan Uddin 2021-2-10-012 33.33%
Shafayetul Islam 2021-2-10-006 33.33%
 Letter of Transmittal
Dr.Jashim Uddin
Professor
Department of Business Administration,
East West University
Aftabnagar, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh
Subject: Term paper on “Freedom and prosperity indexes comparison among 5
countries”
Dear Sir,
We are glad to compare the “Freedom and prosperity indexes " among selected countries.
When writing the report, we focused on the subject and attempted to integrate and provide the
complete information we could. We believe it will give you an image of how a freedom and
prosperity index compares 5 countries.
We appreciate your letting us write a term paper on an interesting concept. This will
undoubtedly give us experience that we can use in our careers. We are always available to
address any additional inquiries on this study.
Sincerely,
Name ID No
Sumaiya Chowdhury 2021-2-10-281
Borhan Uddin 2021-2-10-012
Shafayetul Islam 2021-2-10-006
 Acknowledgment

On behalf of our team, I extend our deepest gratitude to everyone who contributed to the
process of preparing this term paper. The journey we embarked on was challenging yet
rewarding, and it would not have been possible without the collective effort and support from
various individuals and entities.
Firstly, we would like to express our sincere appreciation to our course advisor, Dr. Jashim
Uddin Sir, Professor for his invaluable guidance, patience, and expertise. Your mentorship
has been a guiding light throughout this process, and we are immensely grateful for your
support.
A special note of thanks goes to our group members. Working alongside such dedicated and
talented individuals has been an enriching experience. Each member brought unique skills
and perspectives to the table, creating a synergy that was crucial for the completion of our
project. Your hard work, commitment, and camaraderie have not only contributed to the
success of this term paper but have also fostered a supportive and enjoyable working
environment.
We would also like to acknowledge the contributions of industry experts and professionals
who provided us with practical insights and real-world perspectives. Your expertise has
significantly enhanced the quality and relevance of our work.
Lastly, we extend our gratitude to anyone who directly or indirectly contributed to this term
paper. We greatly appreciate your involvement, whether you provided feedback, offered
technical support, or simply encouraged us.
This term paper is a testament to what can be achieved through teamwork, mutual respect,
and collaboration. We are proud of what we have accomplished together and are thankful to
everyone who played a part in this journey.
Thank you all for your invaluable contributions and for making this experience memorable.
Table of Contents
Chapter 01: Introduction....................................................................................................................6
1.1 Background of the study......................................................................................................6
1.2 Origin of the Report:.................................................................................................................6
1.3 Objectives of the study...............................................................................................................6
1.4 Scope of the study......................................................................................................................7
1.5 Limitations of Study..................................................................................................................7
1.6 Methodology...............................................................................................................................7
Chapter 02: Discussion........................................................................................................................8
2.1 Prosperity Index (Comparison among 5 countries).................................................................8
Figure 1Prosperity Index................................................................................................................8
Sub-Index of Prosperity...............................................................................................................9
Inequality....................................................................................................................................11
2.2 Freedom Index( Comparison among 5 countries)..................................................................17
Figure 7 Freedom Index...............................................................................................................17
Sub -Index of Freedom..............................................................................................................18
 Executive Summary

This term paper provides a comparative analysis of the Freedom and Prosperity Indexes for
five countries: Laos, Kuwait, Kenya, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan. The study explores how
these nations fare in terms of political freedoms, economic performance, and social
development, and identifies the factors contributing to their respective standings.
Laos shows low levels of political freedom and economic prosperity, constrained by a one-
party system and limited economic diversification. The country's development is hampered
by insufficient infrastructure and human capital investment.
Kuwait stands out with a high prosperity index, largely due to its substantial oil wealth which
underpins its economy and high living standards. However, political freedoms are limited,
with a need for gradual political reforms to enhance citizen participation and governmental
transparency.
Kenya presents a mixed picture with moderate levels of prosperity driven by a dynamic
economy and significant strides in technological innovation. Nonetheless, governance issues
and social inequalities remain significant challenges that need to be addressed to ensure
inclusive growth.
Kazakhstan benefits from vast natural resources, leading to considerable economic growth
and a moderate prosperity index. Despite these economic gains, political freedoms are
constrained, highlighting the need for gradual political liberalization to foster a more
participatory political environment.
Kyrgyzstan faces challenges in both political and economic arenas. Political instability and
weak institutions hinder its development, while economic policies need to focus on
diversification and investment in human capital to stimulate growth.
The paper concludes with tailored recommendations for each country, emphasizing the
importance of political reforms, economic diversification, and social investment. Common
recommendations include enhancing regional cooperation, focusing on sustainable
development goals, and embracing technology and innovation to drive growth.
Overall, this comparative study underscores the complex interplay between governance,
economic policies, and social development in shaping the freedom and prosperity of nations,
and offers actionable insights to guide future policy-making in these diverse contexts.
 Chapter 01: Introduction

1.1 Background of the study

This term paper analyzes the Freedom and Prosperity Indexes of five
countries: Laos, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Kenya, and Kyrgyzstan. These
countries are from various parts of the world. Laos is located on the
Southeast Asian peninsula, Kuwait in Western Asia, Kazakhstan in Central
Asia, with a portion in Eastern Europe, Kenya in Eastern Africa, and
Kyrgyzstan in Central Asia.
Each county's Freedom and Prosperity Index score will be thoroughly
addressed. This score is a composite assessment of how effectively these
countries reconcile liberty and economic development. Furthermore, the
study will look at their ranks and position on the index, giving a clear
picture of where countries stand internationally in terms of freedom and
prosperity.

By examining these nations' ratings and rankings, we may learn about how
different areas and government styles impact their people's overall
prosperity and freedom. This research tries to shed light on the many roads
to freedom and prosperity, as well as the problems that each country faces.

1.2 Origin of the Report:

This report was provided as part of the International Business (ITB301) requirement for the
Bachelor of Business Administration program at East West University. Faculty Dr. Jashim
Uddin, Professor, assigned this term paper as part of the course. Sir has allowed the job of
writing this term paper on a group basis.

1.3 Objectives of the study

● Assess the degree of freedom and prosperity in five nations using the given years.
● Identify important parallels and contrasts in the freedom and prosperity levels between
the five nations across the specified years.
● Determine and clarify the primary difficulties confronting these nations.
1.4 Scope of the study
The research enables us to examine various nations' freedom and prosperity indexes. In this
research, we look at five countries from various parts of the world. The study attempted to
uncover important parallels and variations in the degrees of freedom and prosperity.

1.5 Limitations of the Study

This report focuses on certain years and may overlook significant developments in years not
covered by the research. And the data may not always be true because occasionally based
on self-reported information the ranking may be provided.
.

1.6 Methodology
This section discusses the study's methodology. The information's primary sources are
relevant data sets and scholarly research publications. The content in this research is
primarily based on secondary sources.
 Chapter 02: Discussion& Findings

2.1 Prosperity Index (Comparison among 5 countries)

Prosperity Index
75
65.2868.46 63.16 68.37
65.3366.35 64.46 65.766.3 63.73 65.7167.8564.61 65.47
65 62.61
55.53 56.54 56.83 58.33 58.17
55 49.19 50.52 50.13
48.31 48.93
45
35
25
15
5
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Laos 48.31 48.93 49.19 50.52 50.13
Kuwait 65.33 65.7 65.71 65.28 65.47
Kazakhstan 66.35 66.3 67.85 68.46 68.37
Kenya 55.53 56.54 56.83 58.33 58.17
Kyrgyzstan 64.46 63.73 64.61 63.16 62.61

Figure 1Prosperity Index

Description: The chart and table illustrate the Prosperity Index scores for five countries—Laos, Kuwait, Kazakhstan,
Kenya, and Kyrgyzstan—over the years 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022.

Laos has shown a steady increase in its Prosperity Index from 48.31 in 2014 to 50.52 in 2020. However, there is a slight
decline in 2022, where the score is 50.13.

Kuwait's scores have remained relatively stable over the years. Starting at 65.33 in 2014, the index slightly fluctuates,
peaking at 65.71 in 2018, dipping to 65.28 in 2020,

and rising to 65.47 in 2022.

Kazakhstan exhibits a clear upward trend in its Prosperity Index. From 66.35 in 2014, it steadily increased to 67.85 in
2018, reaching a high of 68.46 in 2020, and marginally dropping to 68.37 in 2022. Kenya's Prosperity Index
demonstrates consistent growth. Starting at 55.53 in 2014, it increases to 56.83 in 2018, peaks at 58.33 in 2020, and
slightly decreases to 58.17 in 2022.
Kyrgyzstan's scores show more fluctuation compared to other countries. The index starts at 64.46 in 2014, drops to
63.73 in 2016, rises again to 64.61 in 2018, and then decreases to 63.16 in 2020 and further to 62.61 in 2022.

In summary, the data indicate varied trends across these countries. Laos and Kenya show overall positive trends with
slight recent declines. Kuwait maintains stable scores with minor fluctuations. Kazakhstan consistently improved with a
minor recent drop, while Kyrgyzstan has experienced more volatility and a general downward trend in recent years.

2.2 Sub-Index of Prosperity

Income

Income (Sub-Index of Prosperity)

95 91.95 92.34 92.37 90.79
88.15
85 78.23 77.56 79.08 78.15 79.95 78.83
72.25 73.47 74.17 75.47 77.78 77.17 74.81 76.77 77.7
75 65.93 66.7 66.7
65.4 64.82
65
55
45
35
25
15
5
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Laos 72.25 73.47 74.17 75.47 74.81
Kuwait 91.95 92.34 92.37 88.15 90.79
Kazakhstan 78.23 79.08 79.95 77.78 76.77
Kenya 65.4 65.93 66.7 66.7 64.82
Kyrgyzstan 77.56 78.15 78.83 77.17 77.7

Figure 2 Income (Sub-Index of Prosperity)

Description: The chart and table illustrate the Income Index scores for five countries—Laos, Kuwait,
Kazakhstan, Kenya, and Kyrgyzstan—over the years 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022.
Laos shows a gradual increase in its Income Index from 72.25 in 2014 to 75.47 in 2020, followed by a slight
decrease to 74.81 in 2022.
Kuwait maintains high and relatively stable Income Index scores, starting at 91.95 in 2014, peaking at 92.37 in
2018, dropping to 88.15 in 2020, and slightly rising to 90.79 in 2022.
Kazakhstan's Income Index remains quite stable with minor fluctuations. The score increases from 78.23 in
2014 to 79.95 in 2018, drops to 77.78 in 2020, and then decreases further to 76.77 in 2022.
Kenya shows a slight upward trend from 65.4 in 2014 to 66.7 in 2020, with a noticeable decline to 64.82 in
2022.
Kyrgyzstan's Income Index is relatively stable, showing minor fluctuations. Starting at 77.56 in 2014, the
index slightly increased to 78.83 in 2018, decreased to 77.17 in 2020, and slightly rose again to 77.7 in 2022.
Observations
Laos demonstrated a steady increase in its Income Index until 2020, followed by a slight decline.
Kuwait maintains a high and stable Income Index with minor variations Kazakhstan has stable Income Index
scores with a minor decreasing trend in recent years.
Kenya shows gradual improvement until 2020, followed by a significant drop in 2022.
Kyrgyzstan experiences minor fluctuations but generally maintains stable scores.
In summary, the Income Index data reveal that while Kuwait consistently ranks the highest with stable scores,
other countries like Laos and Kenya show growth followed by declines in recent years. Kazakhstan and
Kyrgyzstan display stability with minor fluctuations throughout the observed period.
Inequality

Inequality (Sub-Index of Prosperity)

74.41 72.66
75 70.61 68.39
66.99 65.42 65.42 65.42
65 60.96 60.96
53.24 51.46
55 47.83 49.21 50.11 49.21 50.11 49.21 50.12 49.21
45 40.2 40.2 40.2 40.2 40.2
35
25
15
5
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Laos 53.24 51.46 50.11 50.11 50.12
Kuwait 40.2 40.2 40.2 40.2 40.2
Kazakhstan 70.61 66.99 65.42 65.42 65.42
Kenya 47.83 49.21 49.21 49.21 49.21
Kyrgyzstan 74.41 72.66 68.39 60.96 60.96

Figure 3 Inequality (Sub-Index of Prosperity)

Description: The chart and table illustrate the Inequality Index scores for five countries—Laos, Kuwait,
Kazakhstan, Kenya, and Kyrgyzstan—over the years 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022.
Laos shows a slight decrease in its Inequality Index from 53.24 in 2014 to 51.46 in 2016, further decreasing to
50.11 in 2018 and 2020, and then stabilizing at 50.12 in 2022.
Kuwait maintains a constant Inequality Index score of 40.2 across all the years from 2014 to 2022, indicating
no change in the inequality levels.
Kazakhstan's Inequality Index shows a gradual decline from 70.61 in 2014 to 66.99 in 2016, further decreasing
to 65.42 in 2018 and remaining at that level through 2020 and 2022.
Kenya exhibits an increasing trend in its Inequality Index. Starting at 47.83 in 2014, the index rose to 49.21 in
2016 and stayed consistent at 49.21 through 2018, 2020, and 2022.
Kyrgyzstan shows a decline in its Inequality Index from 74.41 in 2014 to 72.66 in 2016, then further dropping
to 68.39 in 2018, and slightly declining to 60.96 in 2020 and maintaining that score in 2022.
Observations
Laos exhibits a gradual decrease in inequality over the years, with scores stabilizing around 50.12 from 2018
onwards.
Kuwait maintains a consistent level of inequality, with no changes over the observed period.
Kazakhstan has shown a steady decline in inequality, reaching a stable level from 2018 onwards.
Kenya indicates increasing inequality, with scores rising slightly and then stabilizing at 49.21.
Kyrgyzstan demonstrates a significant reduction in inequality from 2014 to 2022.
In summary, the Inequality Index data reveal different trends among the countries. Laos, Kazakhstan, and
Kyrgyzstan show a general trend of decreasing inequality, with Kyrgyzstan showing the most significant
reduction. Kuwait's inequality levels remain unchanged, while Kenya exhibits an increasing trend in
inequality.

Environment

Environment(Sub-index of Prosperity)
95 89.98 89.62 89.34 89.16 89.16
85 78.63 80.13 81.29 81.74 81.74
77.56 78.51 78.01 78.68 78.01 78.68
75.51 74.61 76.53 76.9
75
65 59.98 61.51 62.3 62.34 62.34
55
45
35
25
15
5
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Laos 59.98 61.51 62.3 62.34 62.34
Kuwait 89.98 89.62 89.34 89.16 89.16
Kazakhstan 75.51 76.53 77.56 78.01 78.01
Kenya 78.63 80.13 81.29 81.74 81.74
Kyrgyzstan 74.61 76.9 78.51 78.68 78.68

Figure 4 Environment (Sub-Index of Prosperity)

Description: The graph shows the "Environment" scores of five countries—Laos, Kuwait, Kazakhstan,
Kenya, and Kyrgyzstan—over the years 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022. The scores appear to be numerical
values, likely representing an index or rating related to environmental conditions or policies. Let's break down
the information for each country:

Laos shows a gradual improvement from 2014 to 2018, with the score stabilizing at62.34 in 2020 and 2022.
Kuwait started with a very high score in 2014 and shows a slight but steady decline over the years, stabilizing
at 89.16 from 2020 onwards.
Kazakhstan has shown consistent improvement over the years, with scores steadily increasing from 2014 to
2020 and then stabilizing.
Kenya shows a continuous improvement in scores from 2014 to 2018, with the scores plateauing at 81.74 in
2020 and 2022.
Kyrgyzstan also shows consistent improvement from 2014 to 2018, with scores leveling off at 78.68 in 2020
and 2022.
Observations:
Kuwait has the highest scores throughout all the years, indicating a consistently high environmental rating.
Laos has the lowest scores, but it has shown gradual improvement, particularly from 2014 to 2018, before
stabilizing.
Kazakhstan, Kenya, and Kyrgyzstan show similar trends of improvement over the years, with scores
eventually stabilizing.
The scores for Kenya and Kyrgyzstan have shown a steady increase, with Kenya having a slight edge over
Kyrgyzstan in later years.
General Trend:
Most countries show an upward trend in their environmental scores, indicating improvements in
environmental conditions or policies over the given period. The scores tend to stabilize after reaching a certain
level, suggesting that these countries might have reached a plateau in their environmental performance during
this period.
Minority Rights

Minority Rights(Sub-Index Of Prosperity)

95 87.65 87.65
85 80.11 81.45 79.59
75 67.05 67.05 67.8
65 60.4 63.68
55 49.31 49.31 49.65 52.78 51.29
45.88 49.04 49.04
45 39.12 40.21 39.12 40.41 39.12 45.73 44.01
35
25
15
5
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Laos 39.12 39.12 39.12 45.88 44.01
Kuwait 49.31 49.31 49.65 52.78 51.29
Kazakhstan 40.21 40.41 45.73 49.04 49.04
Kenya 80.11 81.45 79.59 87.65 87.65
Kyrgyzstan 67.05 60.4 67.05 67.8 63.68

Figure 5 Minority Rights (Sub-index of Prosperity)

Description: "Minority Rights" scores of the same five countries (Laos, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Kenya, and
Kyrgyzstan) over the years 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022. The scores likely represent an index or rating
related to minority rights.
Laos showed a steady score of 39.12 from 2014 to 2018, with an improvement in 2020 to 45.88, followed by a
slight decline in 2022 to 44.01.
Kuwait has shown a slight improvement over the years, with scores increasing gradually from 49.31 in 2014 to
52.78 in 2020, and then a small decrease to 51.29 in 2022.
Kazakhstan shows a steady increase in scores from 40.22 in 2014 to 49.04 in 2020, followed by a slight
decrease to 48.06 in 2022.
Kenya has consistently high scores, starting at 80.11 in 2014 and showing improvement, with a significant
increase to 87.65 in 2020 and maintaining that score in 2022.
Kyrgyzstan shows consistent improvement from 57.05 in 2014 to 67.8 in 2020, followed by a slight decrease
to 63.68 in 2022.
Observations:
Kenya has the highest scores throughout all the years, indicating strong minority rights performance,
especially from 2020 onwards.
Laos has the lowest scores, though it shows some improvement in 2020 before a slight decline in 2022.
Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan show a steady increase in scores over the years, with a small decline in 2022.
Kuwait demonstrates gradual improvement, with a small drop in the final year.

General Trend:
Most countries exhibit an upward trend in their minority rights scores, indicating improvements in the
protection and promotion of minority rights over the given period. However, slight declines are observed in
several countries in the latest year (2022), which might suggest emerging challenges or fluctuations in policies
and their implementation. Kenya stands out with consistently high and improving scores, particularly
maintaining high scores from 2020 to 2022.

Education
 Education( Sub-Index of Prosperity)
75 68.6 68.6
63.71 66.41
65 62.18

55 51.55 51.96 51.76 52.71 52.71

45 38.22 39.24 39.24

34.14 36.96
35
22.66 23.27 24.14 24.58 24.58
25 18.73 19.56 19.25 18.63 18.63
15
5
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Laos 18.73 19.56 19.25 18.63 18.63
Kuwait 34.14 36.96 38.22 39.24 39.24
Kazakhstan 62.18 63.71 66.41 68.6 68.6
Kenya 22.66 23.27 24.14 24.58 24.58
Kyrgyzstan 51.55 51.96 51.76 52.71 52.71

Figure 6 Education (Sub-Index of Prosperity)

Description: "Education" scores of the same five countries (Laos, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Kenya, and
Kyrgyzstan) over the years 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022. The scores likely represent an index or rating
related to education.
Laos shows a slight improvement from 2014 to 2016, but then the scores slightly decline and stabilized around
18.63 from 2020 onwards.
Kuwait shows a steady improvement in scores from 34.14 in 2014 to 39.24 in 2020, maintaining that score in
2022.
Kazakhstan shows consistent improvement, with scores increasing from 62.18 in 2014 to 68.6 in 2020, and
maintaining that level in 2022.
Kenya shows steady improvement, with scores gradually increasing from 22.66 in 2014 to 24.58 in 2020, and
stabilizing at that level in 2022.
Kyrgyzstan shows a slight increase from 51.55 in 2014 to 52.71 in 2020, maintaining that score in 2022.
Observations:
Kazakhstan has the highest scores across all years, showing a consistent and significant improvement.
Kuwait has shown steady improvement in scores from 2014 to 2020, with the score stabilizing in 2022.
Kyrgyzstan has shown slight improvements over the years, with scores stabilizing from 2020 onwards.
Kenya shows a gradual increase in scores from 2014 to 2020, maintaining that level in 2022.
Laos has the lowest scores, with a slight improvement from 2014 to 2016, followed by a decline and
stabilization from 2018 onwards.
General Trend:
Most countries exhibit an upward trend in their education scores, indicating improvements in educational
conditions or policies over the given period. Kazakhstan stands out with consistently high and improving
scores. Kuwait and Kyrgyzstan also show positive trends, with scores stabilizing at higher levels. Kenya and
Laos have lower scores, with Kenya showing a steady improvement and Laos experiencing some fluctuations .
2.3 Freedom Index( Comparison among 5 countries)

Freedom Index
64.1 65.26 64.06 64.28 65.73
65 60.19 60.57 60.05 61.41 60.78 63.65 60.04 59.67 61.41
56.28
55 50.37 51.11 52.82
49.25 49.53
43.15 43.09 45.17
45 41.93 42.12

35
25
15
5
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Laos 41.93 42.12 43.15 43.09 45.17
Kuwait 60.19 60.05 60.78 60.04 61.41
Kazakhstan 49.25 49.53 50.37 51.11 52.82
Kenya 64.1 65.26 64.06 64.28 65.73
Kyrgyzstan 60.57 61.41 63.65 59.67 56.28

Figure 7 Freedom Index

Description: The vertical axis, labeled "Freedom Index," serves as a compass, with higher values signifying a
greater degree of freedom. Each nation is represented by a distinct line color and a corresponding legend entry,
allowing us to track their route.
Since there's no graph provided, I'll interpret the data assuming it's plotted as a line graph over time, with the
x-axis representing time (perhaps years) and the y-axis representing the freedom index scores.
Laos: The freedom index seems to be relatively stable over time, with some minor fluctuations. The scores
range from around 41.93 to 45.17.
Kuwait: The freedom index appears relatively stable as well, with scores hovering around 60, showing slight
variations.
Kazakhstan: There's a noticeable upward trend in the freedom index over time, with scores increasing from
around 49.25 to 52.82.
Kenya: The freedom index shows some fluctuations over time, but overall it seems to be relatively stable, with
scores ranging from around 64 to 65.73.
Kyrgyzstan: The freedom index shows some variability, with scores ranging from around 56.28 to 63.65, but
there's a general trend of decline towards the end of the period.
It's crucial to remember that a higher Freedom Index score doesn't necessarily equate to a nation being
inherently "better." The index functions solely as a measure of freedom as defined by the specific criteria
employed in its calculation.

2.4 Sub -Index of Freedom

Economic

Economic (Subindex of Freedom)

64.52 62.82
65 59.37 61.67
60.5160.8859.84 58.25 61.5960.77 62.12 60.9758.74 62.05 60.0458.74 62.0561.6760.04
57.17
55
47.17 47.69 48.13 46.89 46.89
45
35
25
15
5
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Laos 59.37 59.84 60.77 58.74 58.74
Kuwait 47.17 47.69 48.13 46.89 46.89
Kazakhstan 57.17 58.25 62.12 62.05 62.05
Kenya 60.51 64.52 62.82 61.67 61.67
Kyrgyzstan 60.88 61.59 60.97 60.04 60.04

Figure 8 Economic (Sub-Index of Freedom)

Description: The "Economic Subindex," a measure whose specific composition remains undisclosed, serves
as the yardstick on the vertical axis, with higher values indicating stronger economic performance. Each
country is distinguished by a unique line color and a corresponding legend entry, enabling us to trace their
economic fortunes.
Laos: The economic subindex scores seem relatively stable over time, with minor fluctuations around the
range of 58.74 to 60.77. This suggests a consistent economic performance throughout the observed period.
Kuwait: Similar to Laos, Kuwait also exhibits relatively stable economic subindex scores, hovering around
46.89 to 48.13. However, the scores are notably lower compared to other countries, indicating potential
economic challenges or constraints.
Kazakhstan: There's a noticeable upward trend in the economic subindex scores for Kazakhstan, increasing
from around 57.17 to 62.05. This suggests a strengthening economic performance and possibly improvements
in economic indicators over time.
Kenya: The economic subindex scores for Kenya show some variability but remain relatively stable overall,
ranging from approximately 60.51 to 64.52. This indicates a moderate level of economic stability and
performance throughout the observed period.
Kyrgyzstan: The economic subindex scores for Kyrgyzstan appear relatively stable, with minor fluctuations
around the range of 60.04 to 61.59. Similar to Laos and Kuwait, the scores suggest a consistent economic
performance without significant improvements or declines.
Overall, while some countries like Kazakhstan show improvements in economic performance over time,
others like Kuwait demonstrate relatively lower economic subindex scores, potentially indicating economic
challenges.

Political

Political (Subindex of Freedom)

85 78.24 77.88 79.08 76.43 79.13
75 74.11 73.75 75.37 68.16 68.09
65.2 65.45 65.97 65.22
65 61.02
55 47.33
42.63 43.03 40.84 42.96
45
35 27.67
25 16.75 20.72 21.02
16.66
15
5
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Laos 16.75 16.66 20.72 21.02 27.67
Kuwait 65.2 65.45 65.97 65.22 68.09
Kazakhstan 42.63 43.03 40.84 42.96 47.33
Kenya 78.24 77.88 75.37 76.43 79.13
Kyrgyzstan 74.11 73.75 79.08 68.16 61.02

Figure 9 Political (Sub-Index of Freedom)

Description: The vertical axis measures a "Political Subindex," a specific component of the broader Freedom
Index, though its exact composition remains undisclosed. Higher values presumably indicate a stronger
political environment characterized by elements like civil liberties and political participation. Each nation is
distinguished by a unique line color and a corresponding legend entry, allowing us to track their political
trajectories.
Laos: The political subindex scores for Laos show a significant increase over the observed period, rising from
16.75 in 2014 to 27.67 in 2022. This suggests potential improvements in political freedoms or stability within
the country during this time frame.
Kuwait's political landscape, illustrated by the red line, presents a picture of relative stability. The subindex
score fluctuates within a narrower range, generally hovering between 55 and 60 throughout the observed
period. Laos, represented by the purple line, demonstrates a modest initial improvement, with its subindex
score rising slightly from 2014 to 2016. However, its progress stalls, remaining relatively flat until 2020
before experiencing a concerning dip to 52.1 in 2022.
Kazakhstan: The political subindex scores for Kazakhstan show some fluctuations but remain relatively stable
overall, ranging from 42.63 to 47.33. This suggests a moderate level of political freedom or stability
throughout the observed years.
Kenya: Similar to Kuwait, Kenya also exhibits relatively high and stable political subindex scores, ranging
from 75.37 to 79.13. This indicates a consistently high level of political freedom or stability within the
country.
Kyrgyzstan: The political subindex scores for Kyrgyzstan show some variability over the observed years,
ranging from 61.02 to 79.08. However, there's a notable decline in the score from 2018 to 2022, suggesting
potential challenges or decreases in political freedoms or stability during this period.
Overall, the political subindex scores provide insights into the levels of political freedoms or stability within
each country, with some demonstrating improvements, stability, or declines over time. Kenya emerges as the
leader in this political arena. Its subindex score exhibits a generally positive trend, climbing from an initial
value of around 58.2 in 2014 to a more robust 64.7 in 2022. Kyrgyzstan (green line) follows a similar path, its
subindex score charting a course from 37.5 in 2014 to a more politically vibrant 57.2 in 2022.
Legal

Legal (Subindex of Freedom)

75 68.21 68.23 68 69.26
67.01
65
53.54 53.98 54.74 56.38
53.39 50.89 49.51
55 49.68 47.95
46.73
49.86 47.3 48.9 47.97 48.16 48.3 50.82 49.09 49.09 47.77
45
35
25
15
5
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Laos 49.68 49.86 47.97 49.51 49.09
Kuwait 68.21 67.01 68.23 68 69.26
Kazakhstan 47.95 47.3 48.16 48.3 49.09
Kenya 53.54 53.39 53.98 54.74 56.38
Kyrgyzstan 46.73 48.9 50.89 50.82 47.77

Figure 10 Legal (Sub-Index of Freedom)

Description: Based on the provided data representing legal subindex scores for Laos, Kuwait, Kazakhstan,
Kenya, and Kyrgyzstan over the years 2014 to 2022:
The legal subindex scores for Laos show some fluctuations over the observed period, ranging from 47.97 to
49.86. Overall, there's a slight downward trend from 2014 to 2022, suggesting potential challenges or changes
in legal frameworks within the country.
Kuwait demonstrates relatively high and stable legal subindex scores throughout the period, ranging from
67.01 to 69.26. This indicates a consistently high level of legal framework or rule of law within the country.
Kazakhstan: The legal subindex scores for Kazakhstan also show some fluctuations but remain relatively
stable overall, ranging from 47.30 to 49.09. This suggests a moderate level of legal framework or rule of law
throughout the observed years.
The legal subindex scores for Kenya demonstrate a gradual increase over time, rising from 53.54 in 2014 to
56.38 in 2022. This indicates potential improvements in legal frameworks or the rule of law within the country
during this period.
The legal subindex scores for Kyrgyzstan show some variability over the observed years, ranging from 46.73
to 50.89. However, there's a slight decline in the score from 2020 to 2022, suggesting potential challenges or
changes in legal frameworks during this period.
Overall, the legal subindex scores provide insights into the strength and stability of legal frameworks or the
rule of law within each country, with some demonstrating improvements, stability, or declines over time.
 Chapter 03: Comparison Based on Individual Country

3.1 Laos
Laos, officially known as the Lao People's Democratic Republic, is a landlocked country situated in Southeast
Asia. With a rich tapestry of cultural heritage, Laos is renowned for its ancient Buddhist temples, vibrant
festivals, and traditional way of life. The country's landscape is characterized by verdant forests, majestic
mountains, and meandering rivers, offering a haven for nature enthusiasts and adventurers alike. Despite
facing challenges such as poverty and infrastructure development, Laos continues to preserve its unique
identity and charm, making it a compelling subject for in-depth exploration in academic discourse.

Freedom Index &Subindex difference

65 59.37 59.84 60.7 58.74 58.74
55 49.68 49.86 49.51 49.09
47.97
43.15 43.09 45.17
45 41.93 42.12

35
27.676
25 20.72 21.02
16.75 16.66
15

5
Laos 2014 Laos 2016 Laos 2018 Laos 2020 Laos 2022
Freedom_Index 41.93 42.12 43.15 43.09 45.17
Economic_Subindex 59.37 59.84 60.7 58.74 58.74
Political_Subindex 16.75 16.66 20.72 21.02 27.676
Legal_Subindex 49.68 49.86 47.97 49.51 49.09

Figure 11 Freedom Index & Sub-Index Differences

Description: From 2014 to 2022, Laos's Freedom Index has indeed shown improvement, with a notable
increase from 41.93 in 2014 to 45.17 in 2022. This suggests a positive trend in overall freedom within the
country over the years.
Looking at the subindices, the Economic Subindex has consistently remained relatively high, indicating a
stable economic environment. The Political Subindex has also seen steady growth, particularly between 2016
and 2022, implying improvements in political freedoms and possibly greater civil liberties.
However, the Legal Subindex has fluctuated, with a slight decrease in 2022 compared to 2018. This variation
may indicate challenges or changes in the legal framework that could impact overall freedom within Laos.
In summary, while the overall Freedom Index reflects positive progress, it's essential to acknowledge the
nuanced changes within the subindices, particularly in the legal domain, to provide a more accurate analysis of
freedom in Laos.
 Prosperity Index & Sub index Diff ernce

75.47

74.81
74.17
73.47
72.25

62.34

62.34
61.51
59.98

62.3
53.24

51.46

50.87
50.67
50.52
50.16

50.13

50.12
50.11

50.11
49.19
48.93
48.43
48.31
46.49

45.88

44.01
39.12

39.12

39.12
19.56

19.25
18.73

18.63

18.63
Laos 2014 Laos 2016 Laos 2018 Laos 2020 Laos 2022
Prosperity_Index 48.31 48.93 49.19 50.52 50.13
Income 46.49 48.43 50.16 50.67 50.87
Health 72.25 73.47 74.17 75.47 74.81
Inequality 53.24 51.46 50.11 50.11 50.12
Environment 59.98 61.51 62.3 62.34 62.34
Minority_Rights 39.12 39.12 39.12 45.88 44.01
Figure 12 Prosperity Index & Sub-Index Differences
Education 18.73 19.56 19.25 18.63 18.63

Description: The Prosperity Index for Laos has shown a gradual increase from 48.31 in 2014 to 50.13 in
2022, indicating overall progress in prosperity within the country over the years.
Breaking down the subindex:
-Income: This subindex has experienced consistent growth, suggesting an improvement in income levels
among the population, which is a positive sign for economic prosperity.
- Health: The Health subindex has steadily increased, indicating advancements in healthcare services and
overall health outcomes for the population.
- Inequality: While there was a decrease initially, it stabilized later on, suggesting efforts to address income
inequality within the country.
- Environment: The Environment subindex has shown steady improvement, reflecting possibly better
environmental policies and practices.
- Minority Rights: There has been a notable increase in this subindex from 2018 to 2022, indicating potential
advancements in protecting the rights of minority groups within Laos.
- Education: Unfortunately, the Education subindex has remained relatively low and stable, suggesting
potential challenges in the education system that need addressing for overall prosperity and development.
In summary, while Laos has made strides in income, health, environmental protection, and minority rights,
there are still areas such as education that require attention to further enhance overall prosperity and well-
being within the country

Prosperity_Index &Freedom_Index Dif-

ference
Prosperity_Index Freedom_Index
60
48.93 49.19 50.52 50.13
48.31
50

40
41.93 43.15 43.09 45.17
42.12
30

20

10

0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Figure 13 Prosperity & Freedom Index Differences

Description: The graph depicts for years 2014,2016,2018,2020,2022 a trend in the relationship between
Laos's economic well-being and level of freedom. The vertical axis reflects the difference between the
Prosperity Index, signifying economic wealth, and the Freedom Index, representing civil liberties. Positive
values indicate periods where economic prosperity outweighed freedom.
The graph starts with a positive value, suggesting Laos prioritized economic growth initially. Interestingly, the
line progresses towards the horizontal center, signifying a diminishing gap between the two indexes. This
trend hints at a possible rise in freedoms relative to economic prosperity over the decade.
3.2 Kuwait
Kuwait, a small but influential country in the Middle East, is situated at the northern tip of the Arabian
Peninsula. Renowned for its vast oil reserves, Kuwait has experienced rapid economic growth and
modernization since gaining independence in 1961. The country's strategic location along the Persian Gulf has
made it a key player in regional politics and commerce. Kuwait City, the capital, is a bustling metropolis with
a skyline dominated by modern skyscrapers, juxtaposed against traditional souks and mosques. Despite its
wealth, Kuwait faces challenges such as demographic imbalance, water scarcity, and the need for economic
diversification. However, its rich history, vibrant culture, and strategic significance continue to shape its
trajectory on the global stage

Freedom Index &Subindex difference

75 68.21 68.23 69.26
67.01 68
65.2 65.45 65.97 65.22 68.09
65 60.19 60.05 60.78 60.04 61.41

55 48.13
47.17 47.69 46.89 46.89
45
35
25
15
5
Kuwait 2014 Kuwait 2016 Kuwait 2018 Kuwait 2020 Kuwait 2022
Freedom_Index 60.19 60.05 60.78 60.04 61.41
Economic_Subindex 47.17 47.69 48.13 46.89 46.89
Political_Subindex 65.2 65.45 65.97 65.22 68.09
Legal_Subindex 68.21 67.01 68.23 68 69.26

Figure 14 Freedom Index & Sub-Index Differences

Description: Over the specified period, Kuwait has demonstrated a moderate to high level of freedom across
various indices. The Freedom Index, ranging from 60.19 to 61.41, indicates a generally stable environment.
However, economic freedom, reflected in the Economic Subindex fluctuating between 46.89 and 48.13,
suggests some challenges. On the political front, Kuwait maintains a relatively high level of stability and
freedom, with the Political Subindex ranging from 65.2 to 68.09. Additionally, the Legal Subindex, ranging
from 67.01 to 69.26, points to a robust legal framework. Overall, Kuwait appears to strike a balance between
political stability and legal effectiveness, albeit with room for improvement in economic freedom .
 Prosperity Index & Sub index Diff ernce

92.37
92.34
91.95

90.79
89.98

89.62

89.34

89.16

89.16
88.15
86.37

85.74

82.16

82.16
84.5
65.71

65.47
65.33

65.28
65.7

52.78

51.29
49.65
49.31

49.31

39.24

39.24
38.22
36.96
40.2

40.2

40.2

40.2

40.2
34.14

Kuwait 2014 Kuwait 2016 Kuwait 2018 Kuwait 2020 Kuwait 2022
Prosperity_Index 65.33 65.7 65.71 65.28 65.47
Income 86.37 85.74 84.5 82.16 82.16
Health 91.95 92.34 92.37 88.15 90.79
Inequality 40.2 40.2 40.2 40.2 40.2
Environment 89.98 89.62 89.34 89.16 89.16
Minority_Rights 49.31 49.31 49.65 52.78 51.29
Education 34.14 36.96 38.22 39.24 39.24

Figure 15 Prosperity Index & Sub-Index Differences

Description: The Prosperity Index for Kuwait over the specified period ranges from
65.28 to 65.71, indicating a relatively stable level of prosperity.
Breaking down the sub-index:- Income: Ranges from 82.16 to 86.37, suggesting
fluctuations but generally high-income levels.
- Health: Ranges from 88.15 to 92.37, indicating consistently high levels of health care
access and outcomes.
- Inequality: Remains constant at 40.2 throughout the period, suggesting stable but
potentially high levels of inequality.
- Environment: Ranges from 89.16 to 89.98, indicating a generally positive
environmental situation.
 - Minority Rights: Ranges from 49.31 to 52.78, suggesting some variability but
overall attention to minority rights.
- Education: Ranges from 34.14 to 39.24, indicating some improvement in education
access and quality over time.
Overall, Kuwait demonstrates a stable level of prosperity with high income and health care
standards, but potential challenges remain in addressing inequality and improving education.
Attention to minority rights and maintaining environmental standards are also areas o.

Prosperity_Index &Freedom_Index Difference

67
66 65.7 65.71 65.47
65.33 65.28
65
64
63
62 61.41
61 60.78
60.19 60.05 60.04
60
59
58
57
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Kuwait

Prosperity_Index Freedom_Index

Description: The graph shows the difference between the Prosperity Index and Freedom Index for a country
called Kuwait for 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, 2022. The vertical axis shows the difference between the two
indexes, while the horizontal axis shows the year. A positive value on the vertical axis means that the
Prosperity Index is higher than the Freedom Index for that year. A negative value means that the Freedom
Index is higher than the Prosperity Index. The graph shows that the Prosperity Index was higher than the
Freedom Index for most of the ten-year period. The gap between the two indexes narrowed over time, and by
2023, the Freedom Index appears to be slightly higher than the Prosperity Index. Overall, the graph suggests
that Kuwait is a relatively wealthy country with limited political and civil liberties. However, the gap between
prosperity and freedom appears to be narrowing.
3.3 Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan, the world's largest landlocked country, spans the vast expanse of Central Asia, offering a diverse
mix of landscapes, cultures, and traditions. From the windswept steppes of the north to the rugged mountains
of the south, Kazakhstan's natural beauty captivates visitors with its expansive vistas and unique biodiversity.
The country's rich history, influenced by nomadic tribes, Silk Road traders, and Soviet rule, is evident in its
architecture, cuisine, and customs. Astana, the capital renamed Nur-Sultan, showcases modern architecture
alongside Soviet-era monuments, while Almaty, the former capital, exudes a more traditional charm with its
leafy boulevards and lively markets. Despite its vast energy resources and economic potential, Kazakhstan
faces challenges such as political reform, ethnic diversity, and environmental conservation. However, its
strategic location and dynamic society make it a compelling subject for academic inquiry and exploration

Freedom Index &Subindex difference

65 62.12 62.05 62.05
57.17 58.25
52.82
55 49.25 47.95 49.53 47.3 50.37 48.16 51.11 48.3 49.09
42.63 43.03 40.84 42.96 47.33
45
35
25
15
5
Kazakhstan 2014 Kazakhstan 2016 Kazakhstan 2018 Kazakhstan 2020 Kazakhstan 2022

Freedom_In 49.25 49.53 50.37 51.11 52.82

dex
Economic_S 57.17 58.25 62.12 62.05 62.05
ubindex
Political_Sub 42.63 43.03 40.84 42.96 47.33
index
Legal_Subin 47.95 47.3 48.16 48.3 49.09
dex

Description: This graph has multiple lines, but it lacks labels for the y-axis and the multiple lines. It also has
years on the x-axis, but it starts in 2014 and ends in 2022.
Without labels for the y-axis and the multiple lines, it's difficult to say for sure what the graph is trying to
show. However, given the title "Freedom Index & Subindex difference" and the presence of multiple lines, it's
possible that the graph is plotting the freedom index and subindices (economic, political, and legal) for
Kazakhstan over time.
Here's what we can glean from the graph:
* The freedom index for Kazakhstan appears to be higher than all three subindices throughout the measured
period.
* The economic subindex seems to be the highest subindex for Kazakhstan.
* The freedom index and all subindices appear to have increased slightly between 2014 and 2022.
 Prosperity Index & Sub index Diff ernce

79.95
79.08
78.23

78.01

78.01
77.78
77.56

76.77
76.53
75.51

72.36
72.02

71.89
71.16

71.05
70.61

68.46

68.37
67.85
66.99

66.41
66.32

65.42

65.42

65.42
63.71

68.6

68.6
62.18

66.3

49.04

49.04
45.73
40.41
40.21

Kazakhstan 2014 Kazakhstan 2016 Kazakhstan 2018 Kazakhstan 2020 Kazakhstan 2022

Prosperity_In 66.32 66.3 67.85 68.46 68.37

dex
Income 71.16 71.05 72.02 71.89 72.36
Health 78.23 79.08 79.95 77.78 76.77
Inequality 70.61 66.99 65.42 65.42 65.42
Environment 75.51 76.53 77.56 78.01 78.01
Minority_Rig 40.21 40.41 45.73 49.04 49.04
hts
Education 62.18 63.71 66.41 68.6 68.6

The graph titled "PROSPERITY INDEX & SUB INDEX DIFFERENCE" shows the values for the prosperity
index and sub index for Kazakhstan between 2014 and 2022. The prosperity index is consistently higher than
the sub index throughout the five years.
Here's a more detailed breakdown of the graph:
* The prosperity index starts at 66.32 in 2014 and fluctuates slightly, reaching a high of 68.46 in 2020 before
dipping slightly to 68.37 in 2022.
* The sub index also shows some fluctuation over the years, but it generally trends lower than the prosperity
index. It starts at 61.18 in 2014 and reaches a high of 66.41 in 2018 before decreasing to 65.42 in 2022.
* The difference between the two indexes seems to be widening over time.
 Prosperity_Index & Freedom_Index Difference
80

70 66.32 66.3 67.85 68.46 68.37

60
51.11 52.82
49.25 49.53 50.37
50

40

30

20

10

0
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Kazakhstan

Prosperity_Index Freedom_Index

The graph shows the difference between a country's prosperity index and its freedom index, for the years 2014
to 2022. The prosperity index is consistently higher than the freedom index throughout the five years.
Without more context about the specific country or the sources that created this graph, it's difficult to say
exactly what this means. However, a possible interpretation is that the country has a strong economy but a
weaker record on political and civil liberties.
3.4 kenya
Kenya, located in East Africa, is renowned for its diverse landscapes, abundant wildlife, and vibrant culture.
Home to iconic savannahs, lush forests, and expansive lakes, including Lake Victoria, the country offers
breathtaking natural beauty. Kenya's wildlife reserves, such as the Maasai Mara and Amboseli National Park,
draw tourists from around the world to witness the annual wildebeest migration and encounter the "Big Five"
game animals. Nairobi, the capital city, is a bustling hub of commerce, culture, and innovation, while coastal
cities like Mombasa offer a blend of Swahili culture, historic architecture, and stunning beaches. Despite
facing challenges like poverty and political instability, Kenya's resilient spirit, commitment to conservation,
and dynamic society make it a fascinating subject for academic exploration

Freedom Index &Subindex difference

85 78.24 77.88 79.13
75.37 76.43
75
64.1 64.06 64.28 65.73
65 65.2664.52 62.82
60.51 61.67 61.67 56.38
53.54 53.39 53.98 54.74
55
45
35
25
15
5
Kenya 2014 Kenya 2016 Kenya 2018 Kenya 2020 Kenya 2022
Freedom_Index 64.1 65.26 64.06 64.28 65.73
Economic_Subindex 60.51 64.52 62.82 61.67 61.67
Political_Subindex 78.24 77.88 75.37 76.43 79.13
Legal_Subindex 53.54 53.39 53.98 54.74 56.38

Description: The graph depicts Kenya's Freedom Index score alongside the subindex scores for political
freedom, legal freedom, and economic freedom between 2014 and 2022. The Freedom Index is a numerical
representation of a country's overall level of freedom. The subindices provide more granular detail about
specific aspects of freedom.
Here's a breakdown of the information presented in the graph:
* Kenya's Freedom Index score fluctuated between 64.06 and 65.73 over the eight-year period.
* Economic freedom consistently scored the lowest among the subindices.
* Political freedom generally exhibited the highest scores.
Overall, the graph suggests that Kenya's freedom scores remained relatively stable over the timeframe, with
some variation across the different categories of freedom.

Prosperity Index & Sub index Diff ernce

87.65

87.65
81.74

81.74
81.45

81.29
80.11

80.13

79.59
78.63

65.93

64.82
66.7

66.7
65.4

58.33

58.17
56.83
56.54
55.53

49.21

49.21

49.21

49.21
47.83

41.02
40.12
40.08
39.25
38.52

24.58

24.58
24.14
23.27
22.66

Kenya 2014 Kenya 2016 Kenya 2018 Kenya 2020 Kenya 2022
Prosperity_Index 55.53 56.54 56.83 58.33 58.17
Income 38.52 39.25 40.08 40.12 41.02
Health 65.4 65.93 66.7 66.7 64.82
Inequality 47.83 49.21 49.21 49.21 49.21
Environment 78.63 80.13 81.29 81.74 81.74
Minority_Rights 80.11 81.45 79.59 87.65 87.65
Education 22.66 23.27 24.14 24.58 24.58

The graph shows the difference between the prosperity index and sub index for Kenya between 2014 and
2022. The prosperity index is a composite measure of a nation's economic well-being, social progress, and
environmental quality. The sub-indices are individual measures of each of these areas.
The Kenya prosperity index is higher than the sub index throughout the entire period, though the gap narrows
slightly between 2018 and 2022. This suggests that Kenya's overall prosperity is greater than the average of its
economic, social, and environmental well-being.
Here's a breakdown of the sub-indices:
* Income: Kenya's income sub-index shows a steady increase throughout the period.
* Health: Kenya's health sub-index increases slightly between 2014 and 2018, but then dips in 2022.
* Inequality: Kenya's inequality sub-index remains flat across the entire period.
* Environment: Kenya's environment sub-index shows a steady increase throughout the period.
* Minority Rights: Kenya's minority rights sub-index increases significantly between 2014 and 2016, but then
remains flat.
* Education: Kenya's education sub-index shows a steady increase throughout the period.
It's important to note that this graph only shows the difference between the prosperity index and sub index, not
the overall values of either.

Prosperity_Index & Freedom_Index Difference

68
65.26 65.73
66
64.1 64.06 64.28
64
62
60
58.33 58.17
58 56.83
56.54
56 55.53

54
52
50
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Kenya

Prosperity_Index Freedom_Index

The graph shows the difference between the prosperity index and the freedom index in Kenya over an eight-
year period, from 2014 to 2022. The prosperity index seems to be consistently higher than the freedom index
throughout the measured period.
Without additional information about the specific details of the prosperity and freedom indexes used in this
graph, it is difficult to say exactly what this difference means.
3.5 Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan, a mountainous country in Central Asia, is celebrated for its breathtaking natural beauty, nomadic
traditions, and rich cultural heritage. Nestled along the ancient Silk Road, Kyrgyzstan boasts a diverse tapestry
of landscapes, including snow-capped peaks, alpine lakes, and rolling steppes. The country's nomadic heritage
is reflected in its yurt camps, where visitors can experience traditional hospitality and immerse themselves in
Kyrgyz culture. Bishkek, the capital city, offers a blend of Soviet-era architecture, bustling bazaars, and
vibrant nightlife. Despite challenges such as economic transition and political stability, Kyrgyzstan's
commitment to preserving its heritage and fostering tourism makes it a compelling subject for academic study
and exploration

Freedom Index &Subindex difference

85 79.08
74.11 73.75
75 63.6560.97 68.16
65 60.57 61.4161.59 59.6760.04 60.0461.02
60.88 50.89 50.82
55 46.73 48.9 56.28 47.77
45
35
25
15
5
Kyrgyzstan 2014 Kyrgyzstan 2016 Kyrgyzstan 2018 Kyrgyzstan 2020 Kyrgyzstan 2022
Freedom_Ind 60.57 61.41 63.65 59.67 56.28
ex
Economic_Su 60.88 61.59 60.97 60.04 60.04
bindex
Political_Subi 74.11 73.75 79.08 68.16 61.02
ndex
Legal_Subind 46.73 48.9 50.89 50.82 47.77
ex

Description: The graph shows the Freedom Index and subindex difference for Kyrgyzstan from 2014 to 2022.
The Freedom Index is a measure of a country's overall freedom. The subindices measure different aspects of
freedom, including political rights, civil liberties, economic freedom, and legal freedom.
The graph shows that Kyrgyzstan's Freedom Index has declined over time. In 2014, its Freedom Index was
79.08. By 2022, it had fallen to 56.28. The subindices also show a decline over time. For example, the legal
subindex fell from 46.73 in 2014 to 47.77 in 2022.
The decline in Kyrgyzstan's Freedom Index is likely due to a number of factors, including increasing
government repression and corruption.
 prosperity index & Sub index diff erce

78.83

78.68

78.68
78.51
78.15
77.56

77.17
74.61
74.41

77.7
72.66
76.9

68.39
67.05

67.05
64.61
64.46

63.73

63.68
63.16

67.8

62.61
60.96

60.96
60.4

52.71

52.71
51.96

51.76
51.55

43.11
42.31

41.95
41.62
41.6

Kyrgyzstan 2014 Kyrgyzstan 2016 Kyrgyzstan 2018 Kyrgyzstan 2020 Kyrgyzstan 2022
Prosperity_In 64.46 63.73 64.61 63.16 62.61
dex
Income 41.6 42.31 43.11 41.62 41.95
Health 77.56 78.15 78.83 77.17 77.7
Inequality 74.41 72.66 68.39 60.96 60.96
Environment 74.61 76.9 78.51 78.68 78.68
Education 51.55 51.96 51.76 52.71 52.71
Minority_Rig 67.05 60.4 67.05 67.8 63.68
hts

The graph shows the Prosperity Index and Sub Index difference between Kyrgyzstan and the United States
from 2014 to 2022. The Prosperity Index is a measure of a country's overall well-being, while the Sub Index is
a measure of a specific aspect of well-being, such as income or health. The graph shows that Kyrgyzstan's
Prosperity Index is lower than the United States' Prosperity Index in all six sub-indices. The gap between the
two countries' Prosperity Indices has narrowed slightly over time.
For example, in 2014, the difference between Kyrgyzstan's and the United States' Prosperity Index was 22.98
points. In 2022, the difference was 19.85 points.
It is important to note that the Prosperity Index is a composite measure, and the Sub Indices may not all be
moving in the same direction. For example, the graph shows that Kyrgyzstan's Income Sub Index has
increased slightly over time, while its Inequality Sub Index has decreased significantly.
 Prosperity_Index &Freedom_Index Difference
66
64.46 64.61
64 63.73
63.16
62.61
62 63.65
60.57
61.41
60

58 59.67
56.28
56

54

52
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Kyrgyzstan

Prosperity_Index Freedom_Index

We can see that this graph shows the difference between the Prosperity Index and Freedom Index in
Kyrgyzstan over a five-year period. The x-axis labels the years 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022. The y-axis
shows a numerical scale.
Without more context about the specific data points or the methodology used to calculate the prosperity and
freedom indexes, it’s difficult to say definitively what the graph means. However, we can see that the
difference between the two indexes appears to fluctuate somewhat over the years shown.
 Chapter 04: Recommendations

Based on the comparison of the Freedom and Prosperity Index for Laos, Kuwait, Kenya, Kazakhstan, and
Kyrgyzstan, the following recommendations can be made to enhance their overall development:
Laos
Political Reforms:Enhance political freedoms and democratic processes to improve governance and
accountability.
Economic Diversification:Reduce reliance on natural resources by investing in diverse sectors such as
technology, manufacturing, and tourism.
Education and Healthcare:Invest in education and healthcare to improve human capital and quality of life.

Kuwait
Political Liberalization: Gradually introduce political reforms to increase citizen participation and
governmental transparency.
Economic Diversification: Continue efforts to diversify the economy beyond oil, focusing on sectors like
finance, tourist, and renewable energy.
Social Welfare:Strengthen social welfare programs to address any disparities and improve overall social
cohesion.
Kenya:
Governance Improvements:Address governance issues by combating corruption and enhancing institutional
effectiveness.
Infrastructure Development:Invest in infrastructure to support economic activities, particularly in rural
areas.
Inclusive Growth:Promote policies that ensure economic growth benefits all segments of society, reducing
inequality.
Kazakhstan:
Political Reforms:Gradually expand political freedoms to foster a more open and participatory political
environment.
Economic Modernization:Continue modernizing the economy by encouraging innovation and
entrepreneurship.
Education and Skills Development:Focus on education and skills development to prepare the workforce for
a diversified economy.
Kyrgyzstan
Strengthen Institutions:Improve political and legal institutions to enhance stability and attract investment.
Economic Policy:Formulate clear economic policies that encourage investment and economic diversification.
Social Programs: Implement social programs aimed at poverty reduction and improving healthcare and
education.

Common Recommendations:

Regional Cooperation: Enhance regional cooperation among these countries to share best
practices, improve trade relations, and address common challenges.
Sustainable Development: Focus on sustainable development goals to ensure
long-term economic, social, and environmental well-being.
Technology and Innovation: Embrace technology and innovation across sectors to drive
economic growth and improve efficiency.

These recommendations, tailored to the unique contexts of each country, can help enhance
their freedom and prosperity, fostering a more inclusive and sustainable development
trajectory.
 Chapter 05: Conclusion

The analysis of the Freedom and Prosperity Index for Laos, Kuwait, Kenya, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan
reveals significant diversity in their political, economic, and social landscapes. Laos and Kyrgyzstan, while
rich in cultural heritage and natural resources, face challenges in political freedom and economic development,
impacting their overall prosperity. Kuwait stands out with a high prosperity index driven by substantial oil
wealth, which bolsters its economy and living standards, although political freedom is limited. Kenya, with its
dynamic economy and strides in technological innovation, shows moderate levels of prosperity, yet grapples
with governance issues and social inequalities. Kazakhstan, leveraging its vast natural resources, exhibits
considerable economic growth and a moderate prosperity index, but political freedoms remain constrained.
Each country's unique context underscores the complex interplay between governance, economic policies, and
social development in shaping their respective freedom and prosperity indices
 References
● Roll, R., & Talbott, J. (2003). Political and economic freedoms and prosperity. Journal of
Democracy, 14(3), 75-89.
● Lund, C. (2013). Fragmented sovereignty: land reform and dispossession in Laos. In New
Frontiers of Land Control (pp. 219-239). Routledge.
● Lowry, J. (2013). Freedom of information and government records in Kenya, Uganda and
Tanzania. Archives and Manuscripts, 41(1), 23-32.
● Letete, E., & Sarr, M. (2017). Evolution and Measurement of Institutions in Kenya.
Journal of Development Perspectives, 1(1-2), 171-192.
● Dave, B. (2007). Kazakhstan. Nations in transit, 325-347.
● Radnitz, S. (2006). What really happened in Kyrgyzstan?. J. Democracy, 17, 132.

Website link:

https://freedom-and-prosperity-Indexes.atlanticcouncil.org/#rankings