ORBIT: One Platform, Education For All

Aarav Jain[1], Anjali Arya[2], Anjali Joshi[3], Gagan Arora[4]

[1]aaravjain415@gmail.com,[2]anjaliarya2701@gmail.com,[3]anjalijoshi710@gmail.com,
[4]arorag2577@gmail.com

Bachelor of Technology
Department of Information Technology
Inderprastha Engineering College, Sahibabad Industrial Area Site-4 Ghaziabad India

I. ABSTRACT
This comprehensive platform caters to the diverse needs of professionals, job seekers, and students alike, offering a plethora of
resources for education and career advancement. It encompasses various tools such as skills assessments, certification programs,
mentorship networks, and job matching services, alongside personalized learning paths. Leveraging technology, it seamlessly
integrates education and work, empowering users to thrive on their own terms. Facilitating collaboration, the platform fosters a
dynamic community where users can share expertise and provide feedback. Utilizing data analytics, it continually enhances the
educational experience. Future endeavors include integrating advanced technologies like virtual and augmented reality and
artificial intelligence, expanding global reach, and forging strategic partnerships with employers and educational institutions. By
ensuring adaptability and sustainability, these initiatives aim to empower users for years to come.

II. INTRODUCTION
In today's dynamic world, the realms of education and employment are in constant flux. Traditional pathways fade, skills
fluctuate, and individuals face the daunting task of navigating this intricate landscape towards success. Within this context, the
"Orbit" EdTech platform emerges not as a fleeting phenomenon but as a guiding beacon, offering comprehensive support to
students, professionals, and job providers alike. This chapter delves into the transformative essence of Orbit, unveiling its
multifaceted features designed to equip individuals with the skills, knowledge, and connections necessary to thrive in an ever-
evolving universe.
Orbit's vision is crystal clear—to dismantle barriers hindering progression and unite the scattered realms of education, skill
development, and career opportunities. It envisions a future where knowledge acquisition propels tangible career goals and
where employers and job seekers seamlessly connect based on aligned skills and needs, empowering individuals to forge their
own paths to success. To understand Orbit's mission, one must acknowledge the current state of educational and professional
landscapes. Traditional education models struggle to equip individuals with the real-world skills demanded by dynamic careers,
leaving a gap between skills and employer expectations. Orbit bridges this gap by aligning education with employment, creating
a mutually beneficial ecosystem.
At Orbit's core lies a diverse array of skill-based courses meeting modern industry demands. The platform offers dynamic
knowledge spectrums, from foundational skills to specialized courses, ensuring users stay ahead in the ever-changing job
market. Orbit propels users into practical scenarios through real-world projects, transforming theoretical knowledge into
tangible assets. These projects not only validate capabilities but also build dynamic portfolios, enhancing attractiveness to
potential employers. Orbit facilitates direct connections between employers and qualified candidates, eliminating traditional job
hunting inefficiencies. Through a smart matching system, relevant opportunities are broadcast to individuals with suitable skill
sets, saving time and resources.
Users can craft comprehensive professional profiles on Orbit, showcasing skills, certifications, and project portfolios. This
dynamic resume distinguishes individuals in the competitive job market, attracting relevant opportunities effortlessly. Orbit's
technological infrastructure ensures a smooth user experience, offering features like seamless course enrollment, interactive
mentorship connections, secure assessments, and cutting-edge job-matching algorithms.

III. METHODOLOGY

In crafting the Orbit platform, a structured and iterative approach was embraced, drawing upon established principles
from both software engineering and project management domains. This section delineates the methodology embraced
throughout the project's journey, spanning from inception and planning to deployment and subsequent monitoring. The
chosen methodology aimed at ensuring seamless alignment with stakeholder aspirations, fostering collaborative
synergy among diverse teams, and steadfastly concentrating on furnishing top-tier software solutions. This concerted
adherence to a well-defined methodology empowered the development cohort to adeptly navigate the intricacies
inherent in conceiving a dynamic online learning and collaboration hub. Consequently, it facilitated the seamless
fulfillment of user expectations, all while meticulously adhering to exacting quality benchmarks and project schedules.
 3.1 : Project Initialization and Planning

1. Project Kickoff Meeting: The project commenced with a comprehensive meeting involving all stakeholders to define
objectives, discuss scope, and outline requirements for the Orbit platform.

2. Requirement Gathering: Through close collaboration with stakeholders, the development team identified user stories
and prioritized features essential for platform functionality. The team translated these user needs into actionable
development tasks.

3. Technical Exploration: Research was conducted to select the most suitable technologies and frameworks aligned
with project requirements. Considerations such as scalability, performance, and development ease were paramount in
this decision-making process.

4. Architecture Design: The system architecture was meticulously designed, encompassing frontend, backend, and
database components. API contracts were defined, and data models were structured to ensure seamless integration and
efficient data management.

3.2 : Frontend Development

1. Setup Frontend Environment: The frontend project was initialized using React, incorporating necessary tooling for
development and testing purposes.

2. User Account Creation: Frontend components for user signup were developed, incorporating robust validation for
email addresses and passwords. Integration with backend APIs facilitated user registration and email verification
processes.

3. Course Creation: Forms allowing instructors to input course details were designed and implemented. Dynamic
course page generation was enabled, ensuring flexibility in course management.

4. Course Enrollment: UI enhancements were made to enable student enrollment in courses directly from the course
page. Backend logic was implemented to facilitate the addition of students to courses seamlessly.

5. Course Preview and Enrollment UI: Components for course previews were designed to provide users with insights
into course content. The enrollment UI was updated to streamline the course enrollment process, with seamless
integration with backend services.

3.3 : Backend Development

1. Backend Environment Setup: A Node.js server environment was established, accompanied by database
configuration and API endpoint development.

2. User and Course Management: Backend APIs were developed to facilitate CRUD operations for users and courses.
Integration with the database ensured secure and efficient data storage and retrieval.

3. Authentication and Authorization: Middleware for user authentication was implemented, bolstered by robust
authorization checks to control access to course content based on user roles.

4. Assessment Management: Backend APIs were designed to support the creation and management of assessments,
enabling instructors to assess student knowledge effectively.

5. Feedback and Rating System: APIs for collecting course feedback and ratings were developed, with backend logic
implemented to aggregate and analyze feedback data for continuous improvement of course content and delivery.

3.4 : Testing and Quality Assurance

1. Unit Testing: Rigorous unit testing was conducted for both frontend and backend components using industry-
standard testing frameworks.

2. Integration Testing: Integration tests were performed to validate seamless communication and interaction between
frontend and backend systems.

3. Manual Testing: Thorough manual testing was undertaken to validate user flows, handle edge cases, and ensure
consistency in UI/UX design.

4. User Acceptance Testing (UAT): Stakeholders participated in UAT sessions to validate platform functionality
against business requirements and user expectations.

5. Bug Fixing and Optimization: Identified issues were promptly addressed, and performance optimizations were
implemented to enhance platform stability and responsiveness.

3.5 : Deployment and Release

1. Deployment Pipeline Setup: Continuous integration and deployment pipelines were configured to automate the
deployment process to staging and production environments.

2. Deployment to Staging: The application was deployed to a staging environment for final testing, validation, and
acceptance before release to production.

3. User Training and Documentation: Comprehensive user documentation was prepared, accompanied by training
sessions to ensure stakeholders were proficient in utilizing the platform effectively.

4. Release to Production: The finalized version of the Orbit platform was deployed to the production environment,
marking the culmination of development efforts.

5. Post-Release Monitoring: Ongoing monitoring of application performance and user feedback post-release enabled
the team to address any issues promptly and plan for future enhancements based on user feedback and evolving
business needs.

IV. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DESIGN

 V. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

The launch of the Orbit EdTech Platform marks a significant milestone in the convergence of education, skill development, and
career advancement. Leveraging a strong technological foundation and flexible cloud infrastructure, the platform has established
an inclusive environment tailored to the diverse needs of learners, professionals, and employers. Agile development methodologies
and a focus on user-centric design ensure the platform evolves dynamically to meet user demands. Advanced features like skill-
based course offerings, mentorship connections, and a comprehensive job marketplace foster a vibrant ecosystem. Future
enhancements could include expanding globally, implementing AI-driven personalization, enhancing collaboration features,
optimizing the mobile application, integrating emerging technologies, forming strategic partnerships, promoting diversity and
inclusion initiatives, ensuring continuous security measures, and fostering ongoing user engagement through feedback mechanisms
and surveys.

VI. REFRENCES

[1] Selwyn, N. (2015) Technology and education – Why it’s crucial to be critical. In S. Bulfin, N. F. Johnson & L. Rowan (Eds.), Critical
Perspectives on Technology and Education (pp. 245-255). Basingstoke and St. Martins, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[2] Sancho-Gil, J.M., Rivera-Vargas, P. & Miño-Puigcercós, R. (2019) Moving beyond the predictable failure of Ed-Tech initiatives.
Learning, Media and Technology, early view. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2019.1666873
[3] REAL Centre (2018). Synergies Between the Principles for Digital Development and Four Case Studies. Cambridge, UK: Research for
Equitable Access and Learning (REAL) Centre, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge.
[4] Muyoya, C., Brugha, M., Hollow, D. (2016). Education technology map: guidance document. Jigsaw, United Kingdom.
[5] Scaling Access & Impact: Realizing the Power of EdTech (Executive Summary). Omidyar Network.
[6] Haßler, B., Major, L., Warwick, P., Watson, S., Hennessy, S., & Nichol, B. (2016). Perspectives on Technology, Resources and Learning
– Productive Classroom Practices, Effective Teacher Professional Development. Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge.
DOI:10.5281/zenodo.2626440
[7] Haßler, B., Major, L., Warwick, P., Watson, S., Hennessy, S., & Nichol, B. (2016). A short guide on the use of technology in learning:
Perspectives and Toolkit for Discussion. Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.2626660
[8] Burns, M., Santally, M. I., Halkhoree, R., Sungkur, K. R., Juggurnath, B., Rajabalee, Y. B. (2019) Information and Communications
Technologies in Secondary Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Policies, Practices, Trends, and Recommendations. Mastercard Foundation.
[9] Dahya, N. (2016) Education in Conflict and Crisis: How Can Technology Make a Difference? A Landscape Review. GIZ.
[10] EdTech Hub. (2020). Technology in education in low-income countries: Problem analysis and focus of the Hub’s work (EdTech Hub
Working Paper No. 5). London, UK. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3377829
[11] Adzharuddin, Nor. (2013). Learning Management System (LMS) among University Students: Does It Work?. International Journal of e-
Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning. 10.7763/IJEEEE.2013.V3.233.
[12] Hong, KS & Ridzuan, AA & Kuek, MK. (2003). Students' attitudes toward the use of the Internet for learning: A study at a university in
Malaysia. Educational Technology & Society. 6. 45-49.
[13] Coates, Hamish & James, R. & Baldwin, G.. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university
teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and Management. 11. 19-36. 10.1080/13583883.2005.9967137.
[14] Wiryawan, Drajad & Akbar, Zaky & Hiererra, Siti & Luhukay, Devyano & Richard, & Pitchay, Anwar. (2023). Analysis of factors
influencing the use of the Online Learning Management System after Covid-19 with the D&M Model. 138-142.
10.1109/ICOIACT59844.2023.10455936.
[15] Xin, Ng & Shibghatullah, A. & Subaramaniam, Kasthuri & Abd Wahab, Mohd Helmy. (2021). A Systematic Review for Online
Learning Management System. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1874. 012030. 10.1088/1742-6596/1874/1/012030.
[16] Rahman, MJA & Daud, Md Yusoff & Ensimau, Nur Kamariah. (2019). Learning Management System (LMS) in Teaching and Learning.
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 9. 10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i11/6717.
[17] Rabiman, Rabiman & Nurtanto, Muhammad & Kholifah, Nur. (2020). Design And Development E-Learning System By Learning
Management System (LMS) In Vocational Education. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research.
[18] Reid, Lester. (2018). Learning Management Systems: The Game Changer for Traditional Teaching and Learning at Adult and Higher
Education Institutions.
[19] Cole, Andrew & Lennon, Lauren & Weber, Nicole. (2019). Student perceptions of online active learning practices and online learning
climate predict online course engagement. Interactive Learning Environments. 29. 1-15. 10.1080/10494820.2019.1619593.
[20] Chaubey, Aabha & Bhattacharaya, Bani. (2015). Learning Management System in Higher Education. IJSTE - International Journal of
Science Technology & Engineering | Volume 2 | Issue 3 | September 2015 ISSN (online): 2349-784X. 2. 158-162.
[21] Iqbal, Md. (2020). E-mentoring: an effective platform for distance learning. e-mentor. 84. 54-61. 10.15219/em84.1463.
[22] Speer JE, Lyon M, Johnson J. Gains and Losses in Virtual Mentorship: A Descriptive Case Study of Undergraduate Mentees and
Graduate Mentors in STEM Research during the COVID-19 Pandemic. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Jun;20(2):ar14. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-06-
0128. PMID: 33734867; PMCID: PMC8734387.

[23] Balster, N., Pfund, C., Rediske, R., Branchaw, J. (2010). Entering Research : A course that creates community and structure for
beginning undergraduate researchers in the STEM disciplines. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(2), 108–118. 10.1187/cbe.09-10-0073
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
[24] Breck, S., Carr, K., Davis, D. M., Nordhagen, J. N., Nye, B. D., Breck, S., … & Nye, B. D. (2018). Virtual mentors in a real STEM fair:
Experiences, challenges, and opportunities. In Third International. Workshop on Intelligent Mentoring. Systems (IMS 2018) Proceedings..\
[25] Dolan, E., Johnson, D. (2009). Toward a holistic view of undergraduate research experiences: An exploratory study of impact on
graduate/postdoctoral mentors. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(6), 487–500. 10.1007/s10956-009-9165-3
[26] Sagapsapan, John. (2018). Development of Online Jobs Publication System. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and
Engineering Technology. 6. 32-40. 10.22214/ijraset.2018.7005.
[27] Kopuri, Keethana & Mujtaba, Gulam & Aqueel, Hussain & Jabeen, Azbar & Shavali, T & Tech, B & Shavali, Shaik. (2021). A Online
Job portal management system. 3.
[28] Mithun, G. (2020). A Project Report On Job Portal (Doctoral dissertation, CMR Institute of Technology.Bangalore).
[29] Chowdhury, A. R., Areias, A. C., Imaizumi, S., Nomura, S., & Yamauchi, F. (2018). Reflections of employers' gender preferences in job
ads in India: an analysis of online job portal data. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (8379)

[30]Pinjari, M., De, N., Kokne, R., Siddiqui, A., & Chitre, D. (2019). Online Job Portal. International Research
Journal of Engineering and Technology