Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revision Intro To Law Final 2
Revision Intro To Law Final 2
The Quran and the Sunnah. And are called the roots of Islamic law.
:
- what is the main law in Saudi Arabia?
Sharia law and is sovereign above any laws made by the government.
- nizam or kanun, which term wins? And how was the word kanun originated?
Kanun is not an Arabic word it’s greek and it means straightness and good behavior.
It originated in Othman Empire and many Arabic countries used the term such as Egypt, Jordan,
Syria, and Iraq. Gulf countries used the term as they were influenced by the Egyptians using it in
their legislation.
A famous Egyptian school participated in writing the constitution of many countries.
In Saudi Arabia the term nizam was used instead of kanun. And tashreea was used to describe
manmade law instead of islamic law.
The law is a body of rules that are recognized and maintained by the state to regulate human
behavior and conduct.
Islamic civil law covers everything that isn’t commercial in Saudi. Like inheritance and family law.
Commercial law deals with the rights, relations, and conduct of businesses and anyone who’s
involved in.
Maritime law deals with business in the sea. And nautical matters.
Litigation law is a proceeding in a civil or commercial case in the court. Some people consider it
under public law and some under private law. The defendant and the plaintiff is called a litigant.
And the attorneys are called litigators. The lawsuit is called a litigation.
frat'd
pep
Common law : primary source precedent
Civil law primary source :ligilatative and cons
What are the countries that has a civil law code system?
Italy, france, spain and germany. And countries that were a part of the Roman empires.
England, The US, Canada, Australia, NewZealand, and former British colonies.
That each court has to follow its own precedent. And decisions of higher courts are binding on the
lower courts of the same jurisdiction.
Yes since Stare decisis isn’t absolute. Where the court can change its mind or the precedent can
change because of the legislation.
Common law codes are not intended to cover all areas of law but only specific issues. Like the
uniform code in the US and parliament’ acts.
It started with the common law and courts being unfair to the public. People started petitioning
the king who had judicial powers at the time to govern them. Equity was developed and merged
with common law.
Substantive law which defines the legal rules regarding a specific issue.
And procedural law that enforces substantive law in courts.
They are an example of substantive commercial laws called the uniform commercial code in the
US.
There is not since Saudi judges don’t use Taqlid. But instead use Ijthad which is their own
independent reasoning.
How are other muslim countries apply sharia law and how is it different from Saudi?
They determine which parts of sharia to enforce and codify them as well as modernize them. In
Saudi they apply sharia law completely and don’t interfere with it. But the lack of codification
leads to various interpretation of the laws.
No Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy and doesn’t have a binding written constitution.
Basic law was adopted by royal decree in 1992 and it outlines the responsibilities of government
institutions. It’s a primary source of law in Saudi Arabia as well as 5 other primary sources of law.
The basic law did not mention that international conventions and treaties have supremacy above
national law. But it’s recognized since it’s signatory in the Viana convention 1969.
Treaties must be applied after the enactment of national law and is considered the new law.
Normal legislations and they regulate some matters such as companies arbitration commercial
papers and capital markets.
it’s divided between the three branches, executive legislative and the king. So the legislation is
between the shoura council the council of minister and the king
Any 10 members of the council can propose a draft law or an amendment and submit it to the
chairman who will then submit it to the king.
They can issue and amend laws regulations and treaties under a royal decree.
A source of law and is very important in all legal systems because it appeared before regular law.
It came with the existence of societies. And is considered the founding stone of laws.
No it’s considered a secondary source of law since legislation took over. But it’s still very
important in complementing staturtory laws.
Since judicial precedents are considered the law in common law countries what about judicial
precedent in civil law countries?
Civil law countries have the legislation as their primary source and judicial precedents are merely
an explanatory source.
What if in civil law countries there was no custom or rule that governs a specific matter?
The judge would consider looking at principles and case precedents to have a better judgment.
But some countries like Egypt and France do look at higher courts for judgments.
Lawyers would refer the precedent of higher courts not as law but to convince the judge.
What If the supreme court or the court of appeal decided while hearing a case to overrule a
principle?
The matter will be referred to the president of the SC and then to the general assembly of the
supreme court for adjudication.
Not an important source of law. But judges do consider Jurisprudence opinions while deciding a
case. Jurists influence legislature when passing laws through research and academic writings.
These modern jurists were influenced by French law and islamic Jurisprudence opinions.
The hanafi school
The Maliki school
The shaft school
The hanabli school
How are law making powers divided in England?
Between there branches. Executive, legislature and the judiciary. So when dealing with a case I
have to know if it’s under EU law or under the legislation or under precedent.
They are 650 members who elected by the public to represent their interests and concerns.
MPs consider and propose new laws, scrutinize the government and ask ministers questions
about the issue.
Bills are proposed, debated upon then voted on by both houses. Then it’s sent to the monarch for
royal assent and it becomes legislation.
Judges. And as a less obvious source, customs. They might be incorporated in law by judges of
parliament or international law.
There are two levels of legislation acts. General and personal or local. General acts apply to
everyone within the legal system. And personal or local apply only on, individuals, institutions or
areas. An example is the law that applies to individual cities.
It can only be changed in new legislation. Judges interpret the laws but don’t have the power to
change them.
What if parliament can not decide on an issue because of lack of knowledge?
Parliament will pass an act to the executive in the appropriate area giving him the power to make
legislation. It’s called secondary legislation.
The parent act can say something general about the issue. But the details will be left to the
person who has the secondary legislation.
Yes.
Not all laws are made by legislation. Several legal rules are made under a judge’s decision on a
case.
What are the areas of law that has common law origins?
Constitutional law, criminal law, contract law and torts and many important areas.
Some of them do but a lot have been amended or abolished by statues. Common law is still being
made today.
Interpreting statues is excluded from the term common law. However most decisions made by
judges now involve interpretation of statues. So the term case law involves both.
They look to see If there’s any similar cases should apply to this case. Judgments of higher courts
are binding on the lower courts.
The court of appeal has the highest jurisdiction over every area of law.
3 judges
1 - family division
2- the chancery division
3 - queen’s bench division
It has the highest jurisdiction between the three divisions and it deals with judicial review including
bodies of power. Criminal law, torts and contracts.
The prosecutor prosecutes the defendant The plaintiff issues the defendant
Case is heard in magistrate’s court or crown court. Case is heard in county court or high court
Depending on the seriousness of the crime. depending on the nature of the case and the loss
involved.
The prosecutor has to prove the the court that the the plaintiff has to prove that the events took place
defendant committed the criminal act in the matter claimed. A lower standard than
criminal cases
The court will have to decide if the defendant is Depending on the kind of case and what the
guilty or not plaintiff has asked for the court will make an order.
If the defendant was found guilty it will lead to his The court can choose to order the defendant to
conviction and a punishment of imprisonment or compensate the plaintiff. Or to order the defendant
paying a fine or probation. to do or not do something in the future. Or both
Punish the wrongdoer fro his actions that are be contrary to the interest of the state and the public
The finding of defendet’s liability doesn’t mean they’ll take actions since the defendant may not
have any money.
The European Union has varies terms of treaties which has given it powerful legislation
administrative and judiciary.
The legislation of EU can be written by the council and the commission which make it a
secondary legislation.
Regulations, regulations pass into the law of member states automatically and they don’t have to
take an action to enforce it like an act of parliament. Regulations prevail in any conflicts with
national law.
Directives, directives are binding on member states as to the result to be achieved but leave each
state with the choice of how to achieve it. Member states are giving a transactional period to
achieve the result. The commission can take actions against member states who have not
achieved the result in time.
Decisions, decisions are directed to a specific category. Either individuals or institutions and they
are binding only on whom the decision is addressed to
EU law is applied in national courts. If a case was crucial to EU law the court will refer it to the
court of justice for interpretation. Then the case is referred back to the national court
The court of justice only answers questions of EU law not national law or conflicts between the
two.