Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OSMEÑA COLLEGE Final
OSMEÑA COLLEGE Final
OSMEÑA COLLEGE Final
2. Raiders of the Lost Correlation: A Guide on Using Pearson and Spearman Coefficients to
Detect Hidden Correlations in Medical Sciences
The search for statistical correlations between two data distributions constitutes one of the
fundamental elements of scientific research [1-4]. Particularly in the fields of public health,
social sciences, infoveillance, and epidemiology, these can provide important information on risk
perception and the spread of viruses and bacteria [5-8]. The two most frequently used correlation
indices are those of Pearson and Spearman: the first one measures the linear relationship between
two continuous random variables and is adopted when the data follows a normal
distribution while the second one measures any monotonic relationship between two continuous
random variables and is adopted when the data do not follow a normal distribution; both range
from -1 to 1 [1-4]. A correlation (ρ) is often defined in medicine as very strong (|ρ| > 0.7),
moderate (0.7 ≤ |ρ| < 0.5), fair (0.5 ≤ |ρ| ≤ 0.3), or poor (|ρ| < 0.3) [3]. Nonetheless, it is
customary to evaluate its significance based not only on the ρ value itself but also on the relative
p-value [3]. The first problem in this approach is precisely the meaning of the p-value: some
authors believe that exceeding the significance threshold α implies the immediate acceptance of
the null hypothesis [9]; others assert that the p-value should be used as an index of the evidences
found against the null hypothesis [10-12], and others conclude that the p-value in itself does not
provide any information on the validity of the model used [13-14]. However, all cited authors
agree that the mere violation of the significance threshold is not a criterion for the rejection of a
statistical relationship. Therefore, in this paper, no significance threshold has been fixed and p-
values (p) and Pearson (R) and Spearman (r) coefficients were used to evaluate the statistical
significance and the strength of the correlations analyzed.
Thus, it is essential to collect data covering more qualitative aspects of school routine, besides
students’ proficiency measurements. In this sense, when analysing large amounts of data
containing qualitative aspects that demonstrate the occurrence of a given phenomenon, we see
ourselves overloaded with information that, if not accompanied by actions, hinders us from
reaching conclusions that can indicate paths to the learner, teachers, pedagogues, and managers.
This burden is likely to curb the improvement of practices that may allow new dynamics to bring
those actors closer to a greater degree of satisfaction, possible retention, less overload and,
consequently, improvement in teaching and learning.
Therefore, we can say that even if the focus is only to assess learners. For example, when
reflections of what led them to have low performance are not observed-, the educational
ecosystem stops being fed with variables that were not reflected and, consequently, there were no
referrals to possible decision-making to equate the problems faced by it, leaving incomplete the
cycle of a possible assessment.
5. A correlation study: Quality of Life and Mental Health of Psychology Students Amidst
the Pandemic.
The aim of this study was to see if there was a correlation between the selected
individuals quality of life and their demographic profile such as age, sex, year level and
family socio economic status, as well as their mental health. This study employed a
correlational approach to analyze the answer of 143 psychology students from a
particular institution in Metro Manila. According to the results of the Mental Health of
the Participants survey, the majority of the participants reported really severe anxiety
symptoms as a result of the pandemic. Furthermore, the individuals are under a great deal
of stress, and the majority of them, according to the DASS-21 exhibit quite severe
depression symptoms.