Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gibbons - Womens Suffrage - Encyclopedia - Eugenics Archive
Gibbons - Womens Suffrage - Encyclopedia - Eugenics Archive
Through the first half of the Twentieth Century, people across Canada fought for the right of women to vote and
participate in electoral office. The Canadian Women’s Suffrage Association developed in 1883, and the
Dominion Women’s Enfranchisement Association was incorporated in 1889. In the Prairie Provinces, the
women’s movement was particularly active. Women were granted the vote in Manitoba in 1916, Alberta and
Saskatchewan in 1917, and federally in 1918.
Responding to the significant legal barrier for women, represented by the language of the British North America
Act of 1867, Emily Murphy, Henrietta Muir Edwards, Louise McKinney, Irene Parlby, and Nellie McClung—
now known as the Famous Five—led the Canadian feminist movement in its attempt to change the terms of the
British North America Act and gain legal recognition for women as persons.
First-wave feminists fought for women to be considered persons and granted equal rights while eugenics
proponents called for strict control of bodies. Yet many of the key figures in the suffrage movement in Canada
were also involved in the eugenics movement. Early Canadian feminists were directly engaged in debates over
defining good motherhood, child and family welfare, and public health. These debates included a broader
scientific justification over ideal motherhood and creating the “healthiest” babies.
Saleeby stressed the importance of motherhood, claimed that women were critical to the next generation, and
further claimed to be “more feminist than the feminists.” He strongly opposed those eugenicists who exclusively
focused on the male line of heredity and supported legal and educational rights for women so long as they
retained their roles as mothers.
Saleeby and other pro-feminist eugenists argued that eugenic feminism was a way to elevate the role of white,
middle class, Anglo Saxon women as critical to the nation in opposition to those deemed “inferior” or
“degenerate”. Valued as Mothers of the Race, these women were to be educated in order to make them fit
mothers and raise better children.
Women demanded the vote so that they could more adequately defend their homes and children. The main goal
of suffragists across Western Canada was to gain support for child and maternal health, education, and general
welfare. These women believed these were not the interests of male politicians, and that they would not be able
to make reforms without political power.
Influenced by the idea of strong children as symbols of a strong nation, women in Alberta organized around not
just the vote but all issues relating to the health and welfare of mothers and children. Early female public health
reformers believed that eugenics reform was critical to national growth, and that eugenics itself should be
focused on more than just the bearing of children. Rather, eugenics required mothers who could bear “healthy”
children, raise intelligent citizens, and be engaged in scientific motherhood methods.
The demands of these Anglo-Saxon women’s clubs, such as the Council on Child and Family Welfare, included
health certificates before marriage to ensure “proper breeding,” but also included morality, education, maternal
health and child reforms. Women were to seek personal advancement not to abandon their societal roles, but in
order to enhance that role and advance the “race”.
The vote represented not the pinnacle success of the suffrage movement, but rather was the point of recognition
that politics required women in order for the nation to progress. For women in Alberta, this formal recognition of
their values as citizens presented an opportunity to make significant social changes. Combined with rhetoric of
“mothers of the race”, the role of women was also linked to the biological future of the nation. Thus the activism
of women in Alberta did not end but rather expanded after their success in obtaining the right to vote. In Alberta,
the United Farmers continued to be in full support of the women’s group and supported many of the petitions put
forward by female members. In fact, between 1916 and 1920 over one third of the petitions passed forward to
the provincial legislature by the UFA were in the realm of health, education, and social welfare, and were drafted
by farm women. These resolutions included training for nurses, courses in first aid and nursing for rural girls, a
clean bill of health before marriage, amendments to the Health Act, increased funding for rural hospitals, and
action to deal with “the problem of mental defectives.”
Bacchi, Carol Lee. Liberation Deferred? The Ideas of the English-Canadian Suffragists, 1877-1918. Toronto:
University of Toronto Press, 1983.
Devereaux, Cecily Margaret. Growing a Race: Nellie L. McClung and the Fiction of Eugenic Feminism.
(Montreal: McGill Queens University Press, 2005).
Galton, Francis, Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development, New York: MacMillan, 1883.
Gibbons, Sheila Rae. “The True Political Mothers of Today: Farm Women and the Organization of Eugenic
Feminism in Alberta,” Unpublished MA Thesis, 2010, University of Saskatchewan.
Gibbons, Sheila Rae, ““Our Power to Remodel Civilization”: The Development of Eugenic Feminism in
Alberta, 1909-1921” Canadian Bulletin of Medical History. (Volume 31:1 2014 / p. 123-42).
McLaren, Angus. Our Own Master Race: Eugenics in Canada, 1885-1945. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Inc.,
1990.
Murphy, Emily F. (“Janey Canuck”). The Black Candle. Toronto: Thomas Allen Publisher, 1922.
Saleeby, Caleb. Woman and Womanhood: A Search for Principles. London: Mitchell Kinnerly, 1911.
Ziegler, Mary. “Eugenic Feminism: Mental Hygiene, the Women’s Movement, and the Campaigne for Eugenic
Legal Reform, 1900-1935” in Harvard Journal of Law and Gender (Vol. 31, 2008), pp. 211-235.