Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Production Planning and Control in Semiconductor Manufacturing: Big Data Analytics and Industry 4.0 Applications Tin-Chih Toly Chen
Production Planning and Control in Semiconductor Manufacturing: Big Data Analytics and Industry 4.0 Applications Tin-Chih Toly Chen
https://ebookmeta.com/product/big-data-applications-in-
industry-4-0-1st-edition-p-kaliraj/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/entrepreneurship-and-big-data-the-
digital-revolution-big-data-for-industry-4-0-1st-edition-meghna-
chhabra-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/machine-learning-for-sustainable-
manufacturing-in-industry-4-0-concept-concerns-and-
applications-1st-edition-raman-kumar/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/social-big-data-analytics-
practices-techniques-and-applications-bilal-abu-salih/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/microgrids-design-challenges-and-
prospects-big-data-for-industry-4-0-1st-edition-ghous-bakhsh-
narejo-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/knowledge-modelling-and-big-data-
analytics-in-healthcare-advances-and-applications-1st-edition-
mayuri-mehta/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/big-data-analytics-applications-in-
business-and-marketing-1st-edition-kiran-chaudhary-mansaf-alam/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/contemporary-issues-in-
communication-cloud-and-big-data-analytics/
SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology
Production Planning
and Control
in Semiconductor
Manufacturing
Big Data Analytics and Industry 4.0
Applications
123
Tin-Chih Toly Chen
Department of Industrial Engineering
and Management
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Hsinchu, Taiwan
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Contents
v
vi Contents
Big data involves datasets of sizes that exceed the capabilities of typical database
software tools to capture, store, manage, and analyze [1]. The definition of big data
analytics can be viewed from various perspectives. According to the definition
given by SAS Institute, big data analytics is to examine large amounts of data to
uncover hidden patterns, correlations, and other insights [2]. Over traditional data
analysis methods, big data analytics may have the following advantages [2]:
• Big data analytics is much more efficient in processing large amounts of data.
• Big data analytics can support real-time applications.
Advanced Huge
Real-time Analytics Amount of
Applications Techniques Data
Efficiency Effectiveness
Cycle time reduction is pursued by factories around the world. To achieve this,
the relationship between the features (or production conditions) and cycle times of
jobs is fitted. Based on the fitted relationship, these features (or production con-
ditions) can be adjusted to shorten the cycle times of jobs. However, there are many
possible production conditions that can affect the cycle time of a job. In addition, a
large, complex production system has thousands or even tens of thousands of jobs,
making cycle time prediction and reduction a complex big data analysis problem.
As a result, most past studies have failed to accurately estimate the cycle time of a
job. To address this problem, in Chen and Wang [10], a group of experts was
formed, each of which constructed a fuzzy deep neural network (FDNN) to estimate
the cycle time range of a job in a wafer fab instead. Then, the fuzzy weighted
intersection (FWI) [11] was applied to aggregate the cycle time ranges estimated by
all experts.
Deep learning usually means ANNs with multiple hidden layers. Some studies
have shown that an ANN with a single hidden layer may require a large number of
neurons to handle a big data problem, which is time-consuming. In contrast,
sometimes a deep neural network (DNN) can solve a big data problem quicker with
fewer neurons [12]. How to configure a DNN for a big data problem is a critical
issue. The effectiveness and efficiency can be further enhanced by parallel pro-
cessing. For example, Raina et al. [13] constructed stacked restricted Boltzmann
machines (RBMs) to solve a big data problem with multiple processing units in
parallel.
In Li et al. [14], 75 process parameters were considered to affect the formation of
eight kinds of defects in castings. The values of some process parameters could be
retrieved from the control system of a machine, while those of others were collected
through sensors connected to the machine. The collected data were transmitted to a
smart middleware through an intranet for preprocessing (including data structuring,
data formalization/standardization, redundancy removal, and data framing). The
processed data were then uploaded via the Internet to a cloud-based system, on
which an ANN was constructed to predict defect types based on relevant process
parameters.
Numerous frameworks or architectures have been established to give a roadmap
to applying big data analytics to manufacturing systems. However, although such
frameworks or architectures have attracted the attention of researchers and practi-
tioners in related fields, their practicability remains questionable. In Wang et al.
[15], software agents communicate with each other on behalf of machines and other
physical resources, forming an industrial network, i.e., Internet of machines
(IoM) or Internet of things (IoT). The big data collected from the industrial network
were then uploaded onto the cloud for access by statisticians and coordinators via
handheld devices.
The volume of big data leads to difficulties in data collection, storage, and
analysis. To overcome this difficulty, the collected big data can be analyzed to find
any correlation in the data. For example, future values can sometimes be estimated
from past data, or the values of some production conditions can be inferred from
those of others. In this way, data only need to be collected for part of the time or
4 1 Big Data Analytics for Semiconductor Manufacturing
production conditions, while other data are estimated or inferred. To this end, Chen
et al. [16] proposed the concept of big-data regression analysis. Being able to infer
future values from past data means that it is not necessary to collect big data all the
time. To this end, they applied a genetic algorithm (GA) to optimize the schedule
for collecting big data.
Job scheduling in large complex manufacturing systems such as wafer fabs is a
difficult task. Production controllers are sometimes forced to resort to
time-consuming production simulation, the effectiveness of which is highly
dependent on the timeliness of input data. For this, big data collected in real time is
helpful. From this viewpoint, Zhu et al. [17] established a big data-based scheduling
mechanism in which a cloud-based simulation service was applied. Simulation
software and hardware used by cloud-based simulation services are more powerful
and newer. In addition, the resources put into production simulation by a factory
can also be reduced.
Cloud-based production simulation services can be accelerated if multiple such
services are running simultaneously. However, due to the huge amount of pro-
duction simulation data, how to balance the loads on these cloud-based production
simulation services is a problem. From this point of view, to further improve the
efficiency of cloud-based factory simulation, Chen and Lin [18] applied fuzzy linear
regression (FLR) to estimate the time required for a production simulation task, i.e.,
workload. Then, production simulation tasks can be distributed among multiple
cloud-based production simulation services to speed up their completion times.
Moyne and Iskandar [19] mentioned two main applications of big data analytics
in semiconductor manufacturing, namely, fault detection and predictive mainte-
nance. For these applications, the quality of big data is paramount. In addition,
combining expert judgment is conducive to real-time analysis, judgment, and
decision-making. In the foreseeable future, it is a trend to further develop the digital
twin of equipment [20], which will also help the collection and analysis of related
big data.
Vindman et al. [21] discussed the application of big data analytics in three
industrial and agricultural processes, namely, large-scale distillation towers, agri-
cultural harvesting processes, and large-scale sorting plants, including big data
acquisition, process monitoring, and anomaly detection. Methods to detect
anomalies (outliers) fell into four categories: distance-based methods, regression,
self-organizing maps, and principal component analysis (PCA)-based methods.
Zhang et al. [22] embedded temperature sensors (and other smart devices) into
the blades and rotors of an axial compressor to monitor the temperature, pressure,
and other conditions of gas entering the axial compressor. Based on the collected
big data, when there will be abnormal changes in temperature or pressure, main-
tenance or repair can be carried out in advance, i.e., predictive maintenance.
From these cases, it is clear that the application of big data analytics in manu-
facturing can be supported by many techniques and tools, as shown in Fig. 1.2.
Figure 1.3 provides statistics on the popularity of big data analytics technology
applications in manufacturing.
1.3 Classification of Big Data Analytics Techniques and Tools 5
Deep Learning
Production
Simulation
Big Data
Analytics in
Cloud
Manufacturing Computing
Parallel
Processing
Industry
Data 4.0
Preprocessing
Industry 4.0
Artificial intelligence
Simulation
Principal component
Random forest
Parallel processing
Cloud computing
analysis
Gandomi and Haider divided big data analytics techniques into four categories:
pattern detection, correlation analysis, predictive analytics, and dashboard or report
generation [23]. In the view of Cemernek et al. [24], big data management methods
are used for data acquisition and recording, extraction, cleaning and annotation, and
integration, aggregation and representation, while big data analytics methods are
used for modeling and analysis, and interpretation.
Jan et al. [25] divided big data tools into three categories: batch processing tools,
stream processing tools (for real-time big data), and interactive analysis tools.
6 1 Big Data Analytics for Semiconductor Manufacturing
System
Category (Hardware and Methodology
Software)
Big Data
I II
Collection
Big Data
III IV
Analysis
Big data analytics techniques and tools can be roughly divided into two cate-
gories for collecting and analyzing big data, respectively. In addition, big data
analytics techniques and tools can also be classified into systems (hardware and
software) and methodologies. Considering both divisions together results in four
categories, as shown in Fig. 1.4. Some examples of each category are given as
follows:
• Category I: The most famous big data analytics tool is Apache Hadoop, which is
a set of open-source software utilities that help solve problems involving large
amounts of data and computation using a network of multiple computers. It
provides a software framework for distributed storage and processing of big data
using the MapReduce programming model [26]. Similar software systems
include Dryad that uses a cluster of computers to solve large problems, Talend
Open Studio with a graphical interface to visualize data, Apache Mahout that
implements machine learning techniques, Pentaho that facilitates the access,
integration, visualization, and exploration of business big data, etc. [25]. Soft-
ware systems that handle streaming (i.e., real-time) big data include Storm,
Splunk, SQLstream, S4, Apache Kafka, etc. [25]. In addition, software systems
such as Google’s Dremel and Apache Drill provide interfaces for users to
analyze big data interactively [25]. Smart sensors and devices for monitoring
machine conditions, wireless communication infrastructures for transmitting big
data [27], data mining or optimization software for implementing big data
analytics [28], and cloud-based platforms [18, 29] also fall in this category [22].
In addition, some big data is not collected in real time, but retrieved from the
manufacturing execution system (MES) or production management information
system (PROMIS) of the factory. Such information systems also belong to this
category [18].
• Category II: For example, job cycle time forecasting is a big data analysis
problem that is often discussed [29–31]. The required data are usually extracted
from the MES or PROMIS system of a factory, preprocessed, dependencies
removed, and checked for the correlation with cycle time [15]. Related methods
for data preprocessing, dependency reduction, and correlation analysis all fall
into this category [16–18]. Also, to reduce the amount of big data detected by
sensors attached to machines or jobs, the statistics on such data (e.g., averages,
1.3 Classification of Big Data Analytics Techniques and Tools 7
standard deviations, time series (e.g., moving averages), etc.) can be collected.
Then, if the relationship between these statistics and the predicted (or identified)
target can be fitted, then from now on only these statistics are stored instead of
the raw data. By collecting big data in this way, the efficiency of data man-
agement and analysis will be greatly improved [32]. In addition, edge computing
is expected to facilitate the downsizing of big data by processing raw data at the
forefront of the information flow [33].
• Category III: In-memory analytics is a method of querying data as it resides in
the random access memory (RAM) of a computer, rather than querying data
stored on physical disks [34]. Apache Hadoop also supports this function. Data
visualization, natural language processing, AI, and production simulation can be
supported by specific hardware and/or software that also fall in this category [35,
36]. Further, distributed computing, parallel computing, cloud computing, and
edge computing systems also belong to this category of tools [37].
• Category IV: SQL queries, data mining, statistical analysis, fact clustering, data
visualization, natural language processing, text analytics, AI (including machine
learning), and production simulation are prevalent techniques for analyzing big
data [5–7]. Methods that support distributed or parallel computing, such as
(fuzzy) collaborative intelligence [38–40], classification before prediction (or
recognition) [41, 42], ANN or DNN ensembles [42–44], random forests [45],
etc. also fall into this category.
A summary of big data analytics techniques and tools in the four categories is
given in Table 1.1
A big-data-friendly solution is composed of the following parts [21]:
Table 1.1 Big data analytics techniques and tools in the four categories
Category Big data analytics techniques and tools
I Apache Hadoop, Talend Open Studio, Apache Mahout, Pentaho, Storm, Splunk,
SQLstream, S4, Apache Kafka, Google’s Dremel, Apache Drill, smart sensors or
devices, data mining or optimization software, cloud-based platforms, MES,
PROMIS, etc.
II Data preprocessing, dependency reduction, correlation analysis, statistical
analysis, time-series analysis, edge computing
III In-memory analytics, Apache Hadoop, data visualization, natural language
processing, AI, production simulation software and hardware, distributing
computing, parallel computing, cloud computing, edge computing systems
IV SQL queries, data mining, statistical analysis, fact clustering, data visualization,
natural language processing, text analytics, AI, production simulation
8 1 Big Data Analytics for Semiconductor Manufacturing
Production simulation is often used to analyze large and complex factory data
that are intractable to general data analysis or statistical software [2]. From this
definition, production simulation is indeed one of the tools of big data analytics [3].
It’s no wonder that after the advent of big data analytics, production simulation
software has become a hot commodity.
• In a wafer fab, there are thousands to tens of thousands of wafer lots being
produced or waiting to be produced at the same time. These wafer lots are
accompanied by a huge amount of time and quality-related data that must be
collected and analyzed. Hasserjian [47] provided an interesting statistic showing
that among wafer fabrication stages, deposition is the stage that generates the
most data, followed by etching and defect inspection. The number of data
generation points at each stage is in the trillions.
• A semiconductor manufacturer with abundant capital is more able to invest in
system software and hardware for big data analytics. In contrast, the applications
in many small factories focus on the methodology of analyzing huge amounts of
data.
• The integration of production equipment with computers or information systems
in semiconductor factories is relatively high, which is conducive to the real-time
collection and analysis of big data.
Semiconductor Manufacturing
• Variety: the types of data, such as structured data (e.g., tabular data),
semi-structured data (e.g., XML and its derivatives), and unstructured data (e.g.,
sensor data, social media data, etc.);
• Veracity: the unreliability inherent in some sources of data (e.g., imprecise and
uncertain data), the data quality;
• Value: the value of the information extracted using big data analytic.
In the view of Moyne and Iskandar [19], veracity (data quality) is the most
critical dimension. Common data quality issues include the lack of accuracy,
availability, and context awareness. Nevertheless, data quality in semiconductor
manufacturing is relatively good compared to other industries [19]. In addition, the
importance of expert judgment or subject matter expertise (SME) in data collection,
data processing, parameter selection, model building, model and limit optimization,
and solution deployment and maintenance is also emphasized [19].
In addition, Moyne and Iskandar [19] classified big data analytics methods for
semiconductor manufacturing along six dimensions:
• Learning type: A big data problem can be solved using supervised learning,
semi-supervised learning, or unsupervised learning methods.
• Timing of prediction: Predictions are made before or after the corresponding
event occurs. Depending on this time point, big data analytics methods can be
differentiated as predictive and reactive.
• Correlation among parameters: Methods are classified according to whether
or not correlations between parameters are considered.
• Dynamicity: Methods are classified according to whether the analysis results
can adapt to changes for the method to remain applicable over time.
• Fidelity: Methods are classified according to how similar the analysis model is
to the actual system, and how it evolves to maintain this similarity.
• Incorporation of expert judgment: Expert judgment can be superficially used
for model selection, result interpretation, etc. More in-depth expert judgment can
also support data preprocessing, model optimization, etc.
10 1 Big Data Analytics for Semiconductor Manufacturing
• Timeliness of the collected data: Traditional data analysis methods often use
historical data. In contrast, many Industry 4.0 applications embed sensors into
jobs or machines to collect relevant data in real time, which generates big data.
In other words, the more timely the data are collected, the more data will be
collected. For example, job cycle time forecasting is an important task for wafer
fabs. To accomplish this task, the relationship between the attributes of the job
and its cycle time is fitted, which is usually based on historical (big) data. In
contrast, to enable predictive maintenance, sensors are embedded into a machine
to monitor its real-time conditions. According to the collected big data, the time
of the next failure is predicted to decide whether to maintain early.
• Urgency of application: Some big data analytics applications, such as predic-
tive maintenance, have to analyze the collected big data very quickly and make
relevant decisions. Furthermore, subsequent actions such as job rescheduling
also need to be done very quickly. So is virtual metrology. After analyzing the
Electronic Application
Explainability Urgency
Business
Big Data
Analytics
Methods
Location of Way of
Data Data
Analysis Preprocessing
Degree of
Deep
Learning
1.4 Big Data Analytics for Semiconductor Manufacturing 11
• Wafer yield: The percentage of wafers that are not scrapped due to excessive
defects.
• Die Yield: The percentage of dies on a wafer that are usable after final test.
12 1 Big Data Analytics for Semiconductor Manufacturing
Nakata et al. [52] discuss how big data analytics can be applied to yield analysis.
They focused on the clustering of defect patterns on wafers, the identification and
elimination of possible causes of such defect patterns, and monitoring to ensure that
the same defect patterns do not recur. Nakata et al. first applied scalable k-means+
+ to cluster defect patterns, while traditional k-means and k-means++ cannot effi-
ciently handle big data. Subsequently, they applied the frequent pattern (FP)-growth
algorithm to identify the relationship between production conditions and defect
patterns. Both FP-growth and Apriori are well-known data mining algorithms. The
runtime with FP-growth increases linearly with the number of transactions, while
that with Apriori increases exponentially. Therefore, FP growth is more suitable for
big data problems. In addition, Nakata et al. constructed a convolutional neural
network (CNN) to classify new wafers into existing defect patterns. CNNs are
well-known deep learning methods, and properly configured CNNs can learn big
data more efficiently than multi-layer perceptrons and long short-term memory
(LSTM) neural networks [53].
Hamed et al. [54] applied the maximum information-based nonparametric
exploration (MINE) method to identify the causes of semiconductor package cor-
rosions. The maximum information coefficient (MIC) is a measure of the strength of
the linear or nonlinear relationship between two variables, namely, causes and
semiconductor package corrosions in their study. MINE is inefficient when the
amount of data is not sufficient, and is more suitable for handling big data problems.
A batch in a wafer fab may be split into many parts to be processed on different
machines, which is called sub-batch processing. Since these sub-batches are pro-
cessed on different machines, they are subject to defects from different sources (or
causes). In other words, the difference in the machines used is also one of the
influencing factors, which considerably increases the dimensionality of the root
cause identification problem. To solve this problem, Chien and Chuang [55] applied
a random forest method. In past studies, the ability of random forest methods to
handle big data has been improved by subsampling, parallel processing, adaptive
bootstrapping, divide and conquer [56].
Chang et al. [57] applied the open source tools of Hadoop to build a distributed
web-based data storage and processing system on a server with 8 ten-core pro-
cessors and 512 Gbytes of memory for the big data collected in a wafer fab.
Extensive experiments have been conducted to evaluate the efficiency of the
web-based data distributed storage and processing system. Their study was still
experimental in nature. It was not clear which big data analysis applications were
supported by the web-based data distributed storage and processing system. In
addition, with the increase in the applications of big data analytics within the wafer
fab, whether such a system was sufficient remained to be analyzed.
Chien et al. [58] considered chiller machines that were one of the most
energy-consuming equipment in a wafer fab or a thin film transistor liquid crystal
display (TFT-LCD) factory. They tried to optimize the tuning of the chillers to
1.5 Assessing the Benefits of Big Data Analytics … 13
ITRS defined the five Vs of a big data analytics problem in semiconductor man-
ufacturing [48]. An application of big data analytics can solve several V problems
to varying degrees [46]. Therefore, a radar chart can be used to compare the
changes in these five dimensions before and after the application of big data ana-
lytics to assess the benefits of the big data analytics application naturally, as
illustrated in Fig. 1.7.
14 1 Big Data Analytics for Semiconductor Manufacturing
Big Data
Analytics
Application
Fig. 1.7 Assessing the benefits of a big data analytics application for semiconductor
manufacturing
This book is intended to provide technical details on the applications of big data
analytics and Industry 4.0 to production planning and control in semiconductor
manufacturing, including methodologies, tools, system architectures, software and
hardware, examples, and applications. Both technologies are currently the hottest
topics. However, because of this, many studies or reports inevitably exaggerate the
benefits of big data analytics and Industry 4.0, while ignoring potential costs and
the root causes of problems. In addition to introducing the applications of the two
technologies to the production planning and control of a semiconductor manufac-
turing factory, this book also discusses the management implications of the related
applications. After all, innovative information, computer and computing tech-
nologies are constantly being introduced, not just for factory production planning
and control, while how to improve the efficiency and even the competitiveness of a
factory is still the most fundamental issue.
1.7 Organization of This Book 15
of Industry 4.0 and big data analytics to defect pattern identification, yield learning
modeling, and yield prediction are discussed.
Chapter 5, Job Sequencing and Scheduling, discusses the application of big data
analytics and Industry 4.0 technologies to the sequencing and scheduling of wafer
lots. This is undoubtedly one of the most potential applications of big data analytics
and Industry 4.0 in the field of semiconductor manufacturing. This chapter first
highlights the biggest problem with existing wafer lot sequencing and scheduling
methods, namely data obsolescence. Then, this chapter describes how Industry 4.0
technologies can address this issue to move towards more real-time wafer lot
sequencing and scheduling. Subsequently, the chapter describes how big data
analytics techniques can be applied to optimize wafer lot sequencing and
scheduling methods. As in the previous chapters, some simple examples and codes
are provided to illustrate related applications.
References
1. J. Manyika, M. Chui, B. Brown, J. Bughin, R. Dobbs, C. Roxburgh, A. H. Byers, Big Data:
The Next Frontier for Innovation, Competition, and Productivity (McKinsey Global Institute,
2011)
2. SAS Institute, Big Data Analytics: What It Is and Why it Matters (2021). https://www.sas.
com/en_us/insights/analytics/big-data-analytics.html
3. P. Russom, Big data analytics. TDWI Best Pract. Rep. 19(4), 1–34 (2011)
4. C.W. Tsai, C.F. Lai, H.C. Chao, A.V. Vasilakos, Big data analytics: A survey. J. Big Data
2(1), 1–32 (2015)
5. K. Kambatla, G. Kollias, V. Kumar, A. Grama, Trends in big data analytics. J. Parallel
Distrib. Comput. 74(7), 2561–2573 (2014)
6. A. Belhadi, K. Zkik, A. Cherrafi, M.Y. Sha’ri, Understanding big data analytics for
manufacturing processes: insights from literature review and multiple case studies. Comput.
Ind. Eng. 137, 106099 (2019)
7. F. Aqlan, S. Ramakrishnan, A. Shamsan, Integrating data analytics and simulation for defect
management in manufacturing environments, in Winter Simulation Conference (2017),
pp. 3940–3951
8. S. Selcuk, Predictive maintenance, its implementation and latest trends. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 231(9), 1670–1679 (2017)
9. J. Wan, S. Tang, D. Li, S. Wang, C. Liu, H. Abbas, A.V. Vasilakos, A manufacturing big data
solution for active preventive maintenance. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 13(4), 2039–2047
(2017)
10. T. Chen, Y.-C. Wang, Hybrid big data analytics and Industry 4.0 approach for projecting
cycle time ranges. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2022)
11. T. Chen, Y.-C. Wang, C.-W. Lin, A fuzzy collaborative forecasting approach considering
experts’ unequal levels of authority. Appl. Soft Comput. 94, 106455 (2020)
12. J. Pan, C. Liu, Z. Wang, Y. Hu, H. Jiang, Investigation of deep neural networks (DNN) for
large vocabulary continuous speech recognition: Why DNN surpasses GMMs in acoustic
modeling. in The 8th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing
(2012), pp. 301–305
13. R. Raina, A. Madhavan, A.Y. Ng, Large-scale deep unsupervised learning using graphics
processors, in Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning
(2009), pp. 873–880
References 17
14. J.Y. Lee, J.S. Yoon, B.H. Kim, A big data analytics platform for smart factories in small and
medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: An empirical case study of a die casting factory. Int.
J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 18(10), 1353–1361 (2017)
15. S. Wang, J. Wan, D. Zhang, D. Li, C. Zhang, Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a
self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Comput.
Netw. 101, 158–168 (2016)
16. C.C. Chen, C.L. Chen, C.Y. Ciou, J.X. Liu, Communication scheduling scheme based on
big-data regression analysis and genetic algorithm for cyber-physical factory automation, in
IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (2016), pp. 2603–2608
17. X. Zhu, F. Qiao, Q. Cao, Industrial big data–based scheduling modeling framework for
complex manufacturing system. Adv. Mech. Eng. 9(8), 1–12 (2017)
18. T. Chen, C.-W. Lin, Estimating the simulation workload for factory simulation as a cloud
service. J. Intell. Manuf. 28, 1139–1157 (2017)
19. J. Moyne, J. Iskandar, Big data analytics for smart manufacturing: case studies in
semiconductor manufacturing. Processes 5(3), 39 (2017)
20. D. Jones, C. Snider, A. Nassehi, J., Yon, B. Hicks, Characterising the digital twin: a
systematic literature review. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 29, 36–52 (2020)
21. S. Windmann, A. Maier, O. Niggemann, C. Frey, A. Bernardi, Y. Gu, H. Pfrommer, T.
Steckel, M. Krüger, R. Kraus, Big data analysis of manufacturing processes. J. Phys: Conf.
Ser. 659(1), 012055 (2015)
22. Y. Zhang, S. Ren, Y. Liu, S. Si, A big data analytics architecture for cleaner manufacturing
and maintenance processes of complex products. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 626–641 (2017)
23. A. Gandomi, M. Haider, Beyond the hype: big data concepts, methods, and analytics. Int.
J. Inf. Manage. 35(2), 137–144 (2015)
24. D. Cemernek, H. Gursch, R. Kern, Big data as a promoter of industry 4.0: lessons of the
semiconductor industry, in 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial
Informatics (2017), pp. 239–244
25. B. Jan, H. Farman, M. Khan, M. Imran, I.U. Islam, A. Ahmad, S. Ali, G. Jeon, Deep learning
in big data analytics: a comparative study. Comput. Electr. Eng. 75, 275–287 (2019)
26. J. Nandimath, E. Banerjee, A. Patil, P. Kakade, S. Vaidya, D. Chaturvedi, Big data analysis
using Apache Hadoop, in IEEE 14th International Conference on Information Reuse &
Integration (2013), pp. 700–703
27. R.Y. Zhong, G.Q. Huang, S. Lan, Q.Y. Dai, X. Chen, T. Zhang, A big data approach for
logistics trajectory discovery from RFID-enabled production data. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 165,
260–272 (2015)
28. C.E. Otero, A. Peter, Research directions for engineering big data analytics software. IEEE
Intell. Syst. 30(1), 13–19 (2014)
29. T. Chen, Embedding a back propagation network into fuzzy c-means for estimating job cycle
time: wafer fabrication as an example. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 7(6), 789–800
(2016)
30. H.C. Wu, T. Chen, CART–BPN approach for estimating cycle time in wafer fabrication.
J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 6(1), 57–67 (2015)
31. T. Chen, An effective fuzzy collaborative forecasting approach for predicting the job cycle
time in wafer fabrication. Comput. Ind. Eng. 66(4), 834–848 (2013)
32. C. Cecchinel, M. Jimenez, S. Mosser, M. Riveill, An architecture to support the collection of
big data in the internet of things, in IEEE World Congress on Services (2014), pp. 442–449
33. T.C.T. Chen, Y.C. Wang, AI applications to shop floor management in lean manufacturing, in
Artificial Intelligence and Lean Manufacturing (2022), pp. 75–90
34. T.W. Dinsmore, In-memory analytics, in Disruptive Analytics (2016), pp. 97–116
35. T. Chen, L.C. Wang, M.C. Chiu, A multi-granularity approach for estimating the
sustainability of a factory simulation model: semiconductor packaging as an example. Oper.
Res. Int. J. 18(3), 711–729 (2018)
18 1 Big Data Analytics for Semiconductor Manufacturing
36. T. Chen, M.C. Chiu, Development of a cloud-based factory simulation system for enabling
ubiquitous factory simulation. Rob. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 45, 133–143 (2017)
37. T. Chen, Y.C. Wang, A nonlinearly normalized back propagation network and cloud
computing approach for determining cycle time allowance during wafer fabrication. Rob.
Comput. Integr. Manuf. 45, 144–156 (2017)
38. T.C.T. Chen, K. Honda, Fuzzy Collaborative Forecasting and Clustering: Methodology,
System Architecture, and Applications (Springer International Publishing, 2020)
39. Y.C. Lin, Y.C. Wang, T.C.T. Chen, H.F. Lin, Evaluating the suitability of a smart technology
application for fall detection using a fuzzy collaborative intelligence approach. Mathematics
7(11), 1097 (2019)
40. H.C. Wu, Y.C. Wang, T.C.T. Chen, Assessing and comparing COVID-19 intervention
strategies using a varying partial consensus fuzzy collaborative intelligence approach.
Mathematics 8(10), 1725 (2020)
41. T. Chen, Y.C. Wang, Incorporating the FCM–BPN approach with nonlinear programming for
internal due date assignment in a wafer fabrication plant. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf.
26(1), 83–91 (2010)
42. T. Chen, Y.C. Wang, H.R. Tsai, Lot cycle time prediction in a ramping-up semiconductor
manufacturing factory with a SOM–FBPN-ensemble approach with multiple buckets and
partial normalization. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 42(11), 1206–1216 (2009)
43. T. Chen, Y.C. Lin, A fuzzy back propagation network ensemble with example classification
for lot output time prediction in a wafer fab. Appl. Soft Comput. 9(2), 658–666 (2009)
44. T. Chen, Incorporating fuzzy c-means and a back-propagation network ensemble to job
completion time prediction in a semiconductor fabrication factory. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 158(19),
2153–2168 (2007)
45. D. Wu, C. Jennings, J. Terpenny, R.X. Gao, S. Kumara, A comparative study on machine
learning algorithms for smart manufacturing: tool wear prediction using random forests.
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 139(7), 071018 (2017)
46. J. Moyne, J. Samantaray, M. Armacost, Big data capabilities applied to semiconductor
manufacturing advanced process control. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 29(4), 283–291
(2016)
47. K. Hasserjian, Emerging trends in IC manufacturing analytics and decision making, in
Proceedings of the Advanced Process Control Conference XXVII (2016)
48. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, Factory integration chapter (2015).
http://www.itrs2.net
49. M. McNamara, Explainable AI: What is it? How does it work? And what role does data play?
(2022). https://www.netapp.com/blog/explainable-ai/
50. H.J. Yoon, J. Chae, Simulation study for semiconductor manufacturing system: dispatching
policies for a wafer test facility. Sustainability 11(4), 1119 (2019)
51. Y.J. Chen, B.C. Wang, J.Z. Wu, Y.C. Wu, C.F. Chien, Big data analytic for multivariate fault
detection and classification in semiconductor manufacturing, in 13th IEEE Conference on
Automation Science and Engineering (2017), pp. 731–736
52. K. Nakata, R. Orihara, Y. Mizuoka, K. Takagi, A comprehensive big-data-based monitoring
system for yield enhancement in semiconductor manufacturing. IEEE Trans. Semicond.
Manuf. 30(4), 339–344 (2017)
53. S. Lu, X. Wei, Y. Li, L. Wang, Detecting anomaly in big data system logs using
convolutional neural network, in IEEE 16th International Conference on Dependable,
Autonomic and Secure Computing (2018), pp. 151–158
54. K.A. Hamid, M.A. Bakar, A. Jalar, A.H. Badarisman, Incorporation of big data in
methodology of identifying corrosion factors in the semiconductor package, in International
Conference on Electrical, Communication, and Computer Engineering (2021), pp. 1–4
55. C.F. Chien, S.C. Chuang, A framework for root cause detection of sub-batch processing
system for semiconductor manufacturing big data analytics. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf.
27(4), 475–488 (2014)
References 19
56. R. Genuer, J.M. Poggi, C. Tuleau-Malot, N. Villa-Vialaneix, Random forests for big data. Big
Data Res. 9, 28–46 (2017)
57. A.R. Chang, Y.L. Chen, Y.Z. Huang, H.C. Hsiao, M. Hsu, C.C. Lee, H.Y. Lee, W.A. Shih,
H.P. Su, C.P. Tsai, K.P. Tseng, The case of a novel operational distributed storage service for
big data in a semiconductor wafer fabrication foundry, in IEEE 24th International Conference
on Parallel and Distributed Systems (2018), pp. 1028–1033
58. C.F. Chien, Y.J. Chen, Y.T. Han, M.K. Hsieh, C.M. Lee, T. Shih, M.Y. Wu, W.W. Yang, AI
and big data analytics for wafer fab energy saving and chiller optimization to empower
intelligent manufacturing, in e-Manufacturing & Design Collaboration Symposium (2018),
pp. 1–4
59. W. Zhang, A.T. Goh, Multivariate adaptive regression splines and neural network models for
prediction of pile drivability. Geosci. Front. 7(1), 45–52 (2016)
60. S. Munirathinam, B. Ramadoss, Big data predictive analytics for proactive semiconductor
equipment maintenance, in IEEE International Conference on Big Data (2014), pp. 893–902
61. P. Verstappen, Sensor technology plays major role in semiconductor industry (2022). https://
www.sentech.nl/en/sensor-challenges/sensor-technology-for-semicon-industry/
62. D. Naik, How does OPC work for industry 4.0? (2019). https://www.einfochips.com/blog/
implementing-opc-the-interoperability-protocol-for-embedded-automation-industry-4-0-and-
the-internet-of-things/
63. OPC Foundation, Unified architecture (2022). https://opcfoundation.org/about/opc-
technologies/opc-ua/
Industry 4.0 for Semiconductor
Manufacturing 2
The fourth industrial revolution, or Industry 4.0, was introduced by the German
government to build smart factories, which is viewed as the ultimate realization of
smart manufacturing [1]. For this reason, Industry 4.0 is often equated with smart
manufacturing [2]. Industry 4.0 has been considered as a bright prospect for
manufacturing. However, most of the relevant literature and reports are just ideas or
plans, and the possible benefits of Industry 4.0 are rarely verified. Nevertheless,
Industry 4.0 is expected to improve the productivity of a manufacturing system [3].
Industry 4.0 is deeply coupled with big data analytics, as illustrated by Fig. 1.2.
The functions of Industry 4.0 can be divided into the following categories:
assistance systems, networking and integration, decentralization and service-
orientation, self-organization and autonomy, and data collection and processing
[3], as shown in Fig. 2.1. To perform these functions, many concepts and tools have
been proposed, including cyber-physical systems (CPSs), digital twins, Internet of
things (IoT), massive data (enormous collections of simple-format records), big data
analytics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and distributed intelligence [4], as shown
in Fig. 2.2. Big data analytics is considered as the enabler of Industry 4.0 [5].
Assistance
Systems
Industry 4.0
Self
-organization & Decentralization
Autonomy
Service-
orientation
Cyber-physical
Big data analytics
systems
Example 2.1
Predictive maintenance is an important application of Industry 4.0, which reduces
the huge costs of a factory owing to unexpected machine downs. To this end, the
migration of traditional machines to CPSs is distinguished into the following levels:
• Level I: Embedding sensors to monitor the temperature, pressure, and noise level
of each machine.
• Level II: Mining fuzzy association rules [9] from the collected data. For machine
M1, the following rules are extracted:
Rule 1 If machine temperature is “very high” And noise level is “high” Then time
to the next failure is “very short”.
Rule 2 If machine temperature is “low” Or noise level is “low” Then time to the
next failure is “medium”.
Rule 3 If noise level is “very high” Then time to the next failure is “short”.
The membership functions of the linguistic terms in these rules are shown in
Fig. 2.3. These rules form a Mamdani fuzzy inference system (FIS) [10].
• Level III: The Mamdani FIS is applied to predict the time to the next failure of
M1. According to the monitoring result, the (average) machine temperature of
M1 is 93 °C, and the (average) noise level is 67 dB. After applying the FIS, the
predicted time to the next failure is 220 h, as illustrated in Fig. 2.4.
• Level IV: The times to the next failure of two machines M1 and M2 have been
predicted. The results are 220 and 213 h, respectively. After a comparison, the
results are close, but performing preventive maintenance on both machines at the
same time results in a huge loss of capacity. Therefore, the utilizations of the two
machines are compared. The utilization of M2 is much higher than that of M1,
indicating that the former is more like a bottleneck than the latter. Therefore, it is
decided to perform the predictive maintenance of M2 first.
• Level V: A predictive maintenance is performed on machine M2.
24 2 Industry 4.0 for Semiconductor Manufacturing
Therefore, level II migration is not possible if those involved do not know how
to analyze the data collected by sensors. If the analysis method cannot effectively
predict the future status of the machine [11], the migration cannot proceed to the
third level. If only a few machines have embedded sensors, the migration cannot
proceed to the fourth level. The migration cannot proceed to the last level if
appropriate actions cannot be formulated based on the analysis or comparison
results.
Cemernek et al. [12] discuss how to migrate the photo printing process of printed
circuit boards (PCBs). They suggested replacing traditional relational database
management systems with Hadoop distributed file systems (HDFSs) to efficiently
manage big data.
Machine learning
I II
mechanism
part
Control
Whole III IV
Purpose
Part,
Digitalized
V VI
Decision mechanism
part
making
Whole VII VIII
Internet. In addition, a digital twin is also a CPS due to the large number of
computer and computing technologies used in it [12]. The difference between them
is that the physical and cyber parts of a digital twin are as similar as possible, while
those of a CPS may be not. Nevertheless, in the view of Cemernek et al. [12], the
vision of Industry 4.0 is to create the digital twin of a manufacturing system.
Prevalent tools that support the creation of digital twins are summarized in
Fig. 2.7. The applications of some tools are mentioned as follows.
Haag and Anderl [15] constructed the digital twin of a bending beam test bench
(i.e., the physical twin) as a 3D computer-aided design (CAD) model. Then, an IoT
interface with a software agent (called the broker) was established between the
digital and physical twins, so that the physical twin published some of its opera-
tional data at the interface, and the digital twin accessed (or subscribed to) such
data, similar to an electronic business mechanism. The data were then fed to a finite
element analysis (FEA) model that simulated the behavior of the bending beam test
bench. The simulation result was transmitted through the interface to be compared
with the actual result shared by the physical twin, similar to the treatment taken in
computer-aided manufacturing (CAM).
2.2 Industry 4.0 for Manufacturing 27
ANN, FIS,
Electronic Machine
Business Learning
Digital
Twin
Creation
IoT CAD/CAM
Finite
Element
Analysis
However, this application reveals some problems when creating digital twins:
Table 2.2 Choices of explanatory variables and response variables in defect pattern analysis
Explanatory variables Response variables Applicable Industry
4.0 Technologies
Production conditions Number, types, positions, Machine learning
frequencies of defects
Machine conditions Number, types, positions, CPS, IoT, big data
frequencies of defects analytics
Number, types, positions, Number, types, positions, Big data analytics
frequencies of some defects frequencies of other defects
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been constructed and trained in many
studies to predict the cycle time of a job [21–23], which is also a digital twin. ANNs
are well-known machine learning techniques [24, 25]. The predicted job cycle time
serves as valuable information in determining the internal due date [26]. Likewise,
the FIS established in Example 2.1 is also a digital twin that predicts when the next
machine failure will occur so that predictive maintenance can be arranged. Other
machine intelligence techniques are also applicable.
However, compared to the traditional system simulation, other types of digital
twins have received more attention in recent years. One of the reasons is the
application of CPS technologies (especially sensing technologies). In the past, the
simulation model of a manufacturing system is usually based on historical data, and
simulation is done offline. Therefore, the conclusions reached are somewhat out-
dated. In Industry 4.0, sensors are used to collect the real-time data of machines that
are fed to the digital twin (simulation model) to overwrite historical data. For
example, in a production simulation model, the processing time of a job on a
machine usually follows a distribution and is indeterminate. A sensor embedded in
the machine can be used to monitor the progress of the job and estimate the
completion time, which is entered into the simulation model, bringing the simu-
lation results closer to the real state. In this way, the digital twin (simulation model)
quickly analyzes different scenarios and then advises (or controls) the machine to
execute. In short, digital twins bring real-time analysis capabilities to manufacturing
systems that traditional production simulation cannot.
According to some reports in the literature, the benefits of creating digital twins
include more accurate forecasts, more rational decision-making, and more informed
planning results [27]. However, the cost to achieve these benefits is less mentioned.
Whether building the digital twins of machines in a factory can actually improve its
operational performance or competitiveness needs to be investigated.
Zheng et al. [28] built the digital twin of a virtual welding production line. The
digital twin was composed of three parts: the 3D geometric model, the physical
model, and the kinematic model. The geometric model was a visualized repre-
sentation of the production line. The physical model monitored the mechanical and
thermodynamic states of an industrial robot. The kinematics model described the
relative motions of the parts of the industrial robot. Sensors were used to collect the
2.2 Industry 4.0 for Manufacturing 29
physical (such as temperature, pressure, noise level, etc.) and motion data of the
parts of the industrial robot, which were transmitted through a wireless network to a
server. The collected data were used not only to modify the geometric model but
also to analytically detect possible anomalies in the states of the parts of the
industrial robot, thereby issuing warnings. The application of Zhang et al. was a
typical one-way communication: the state of the production line was reflected on
the digital twin. Although the digital twin helped analyze possible problems with
the industrial robot, it could not directly control the industrial robot. For this
application, a CPS that uses sensors to collect data for analysis and early warning
may be sufficient without the need to build a digital twin of the production line.
Vachálek et al. [29] built the digital twin of an experimental pneumatic cylinder
production line composed of seven stations. Three types of cylinders with different
sizes of the drilled hole between pistons were produced. The digital twin was built
using simulation. Although the simulation model also provided a visual represen-
tation of the production line, the processing mechanism of the production line,
rather than the appearance, was actually digitalized. The digital twin (simulation
model) was applied to evaluate the effects of several possible plans aimed to
optimize the performance of the production line.
Bao et al. [30] applied the digital twin technology to a structural part machining
cell, in which the digital twins of jobs (i.e. structural parts), machines (i.e., machine
tools), and tools were constructed. The digital twin of a job included its 3D CAD
model, radio frequency identification (RFID) tag, bill of materials (BOM), and
production conditions that were inputted into the computer-aided process planning
(CAPP) system. The work-in-process (WIP) level could also be easily monitored by
detecting the RFID tag. A machine tool is inherently computer-controlled, so
developing its digital twin is straightforward. The digital twin (computer) controlled
the machine tool, monitored the production process, and detected any anomaly.
In the view of Söderberg et al. [31], the digital twin of a manufacturing system
can be built by enhancing the capability of a simulation system toward the real-time
control and optimization of jobs and the manufacturing system. From this point of
view, they built the digital twin of a sheet metal assembly, which was also an
application of simulation. The dimensional deviation of a workpiece at the initial
stage of assembly was measured and then analyzed using a simulation model to
correct the machine settings to reduce the deviation later. Such applications can be
enhanced by using sensors to detect any deviation from the nominal value during
assembly. In this way, machine settings can be adjusted in real time to improve
product quality.
Zhuang et al. [32] applied the visual reality (VR) technology to build the digital
twin of a structural plate production system. They constructed a Markov chain
instead of production simulation to predict the production progress of jobs on
machines. In addition, RFID was also employed to track the movement of a job.
The production system involved a lot of manual operations with high uncertainty,
and it was difficult to reflect this in real time on the digital twin.
30 2 Industry 4.0 for Semiconductor Manufacturing
Kanbans
IoM
Digital
Production Production
Kanbans Kanbans
data of each machine in the facility layout can be referenced through the DEI
system. In this way, a virtual capacity network that includes the possible suppliers
and users (i.e., factories) of a piece of equipment can be constructed based on the
DEI of the equipment.
Some scholars believed that the background of introducing Industry 4.0 by Ger-
many is its high wage level. In order to be cost competitive, the further automation
and stabilization of production through Industry 4.0 is considered a feasible solu-
tion [34]. This view seems to imply that Industry 4.0 is less urgent for countries or
industries with lower wage levels. The wage level in the semiconductor industry is
higher than those in other industries. Further production automation and stabi-
lization is also the evolution direction of this industry. However, once industries in
2.3 Industry 4.0 for Semiconductor Manufacturing 33
Validate and
Validate and verify the verify the
simulation model simulation model
Run simulation
Run simulation
Generate
Generate performance performance
reports reports
Compare scenarios
other countries also see Industry 4.0 as the direction of research and development,
Germany, which has invested many resources in Industry 4.0, will become the
leader [12]. No wonder other countries have come up with similar advanced
manufacturing concepts, e.g., “smart manufacturing” by the United States, “man-
ufacturing innovation 3.0” by South Korea, “made in China 2025” and “Internet
plus” by China, etc. [3, 12].
Waschneck et al. [3] listed four directions for realizing Industry 4.0 in semi-
conductor manufacturing, namely, decentralization and autonomous decision-
making, flexibility and adaptability, integration and networking, and human
interaction with complex environments.
Reduced
Increased
Repair
Capacity
Expenses
Increased Predictive
Productivity Maintenance
Quickened
Reduced
Yield
Quality Issues
Learning
Cyber-physical Systems
which was seen by many studies as one of the main benefits of Industry 4.0 [3].
Although theoretically, predictive maintenance can bring these benefits, it is
difficult to assess how much the benefits are. After all, it is unlikely to conduct
contrasting experiments in a semiconductor manufacturing factory. In addition,
Chen et al. [11] pointed out that it is difficult to perform pervasive predictive
maintenance and anomaly detection in semiconductor fabrication plants due to the
complexity of manufacturing processes and the variety of equipment. Many wafer
fabs still rely on the trial production of control wafers to fulfill similar purposes,
which is costly and cannot obtain information in real time.
Although a CPS does not need to be connected to any network, forming a CPS
network can realize many benefits, such as the distribution of production planning
and control, promoting the cooperation between machines, and equalizing the
progress of jobs of the same order, etc. However, CPS networks are also vulnerable
to cyber-attacks. Some examples are given below:
Cyber physical
Digital twin
Cybersecurity
Cloud coomputing
Distributive
Production simulation
Intelligence
systems
Obviously, the infrastructure required for Industry 4.0 is more complete in the
semiconductor industry than in other industries. However, it is still unknown how
much Industry 4.0 can enhance the competitiveness of the semiconductor industry.
The difficulties faced by the semiconductor industry include: the overcapacity of
low-end product lines, unstable raw material supply, price competition, the low
yield of high-end products, increasing product diversification, and customer
requirements for shorter delivery times, as illustrated in Fig. 2.12:
Overcapacity of low-
end product lines
Price competition
Difficulties in Enhancing
the Competitiveness Industry 4.0
Low yield of high-end
products
Increasing product
diversification
References
1. C. Bai, P. Dallasega, G. Orzes, J. Sarkis, Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A
sustainability perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 229, 107776 (2020)
2. J. Moyne, J. Iskandar, Big data analytics for smart manufacturing: case studies in
semiconductor manufacturing. Processes 5(3), 39 (2017)
3. B. Waschneck, T. Altenmüller, T. Bauernhansl, A. Kyek, Production scheduling in complex
job shops from an Industry 4.0 perspective: a review and challenges in the semiconductor
industry, in SAMI@iKNOW (2016), pp. 1–12
4. M., Brettel, N., Friederichsen, M., Keller, M. Rosenberg, How virtualization, decentralization
and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an Industry 4.0 perspective. Int.
J. Inf. Commun. Eng. 8(1), 37–44 (2014)
5. J. Lee, B. Bagheri, H.A. Kao, Recent advances and trends of cyber-physical systems and big
data analytics in industrial informatics, in Proceeding of International Conference on
Industrial Informatics (2014), pp. 1–6
6. K.F. Seitz, P. Nyhuis, Cyber-physical production systems combined with logistic models—a
learning factory concept for an improved production planning and control. Procedia CIRP 32,
92–97 (2015)
7. J.A. Duro, J.A. Padget, C.R. Bowen, H.A. Kim, A. Nassehi, Multi-sensor data fusion
framework for CNC machining monitoring. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 66, 505–520 (2016)
8. F. Baumann, M. Schön, J. Eichhoff, D. Roller, Concept development of a sensor array for 3D
printer. Procedia CIRP 51, 24–31 (2016)
9. T.-C.T. Chen, Y.C. Wang, Artificial Intelligence and Lean Manufacturing (Springer, 2022)
10. E. Pourjavad, R.V. Mayorga, A comparative study and measuring performance of
manufacturing systems with Mamdani fuzzy inference system. J. Intell. Manuf. 30(3),
1085–1097 (2019)
11. C.Y. Chen, S.C. Chang, D.Y. Liao, Equipment anomaly detection for semiconductor
manufacturing by exploiting unsupervised learning from sensory data. Sensors 20(19), 5650
(2020)
12. D. Cemernek, H. Gursch, R. Kern, Big data as a promoter of industry 4.0: Lessons of the
semiconductor industry, in IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial Informatics
(2017), pp. 239–244
13. IBM, What is a digital twin? (2022). https://www.ibm.com/topics/what-is-a-digital-twin
References 39
»Kun ensi kertaa näin teidät valossa eilen illalla, tuntui minusta…
kuin olisi sieluni ponnahtanut syleilemään teidän sieluanne. Puhun
ehkä karkeuksia. Minä en kykene esittämään sitä muulla tavalla.
Mutta niin omaehtoista, niin… niin välttämätöntä se oli, että minusta
on näyttänyt… Tämä ei ole pöyhkeilyä, mademoiselle. Se on kai
vaistomaista. Minusta on tuntunut kuin jotakin molemminpuolista,
vastavuoroista on täytynyt tapahtua. Minusta näytti mahdottomalta,
että miehen sielu voisi… kokea niin paljon… tukemattomana. —
Mademoiselle, minä häpeän typeriä sanojani. Ne eivät…»
»Mitä sitten?»
»Mitä? Ken tuo on…?» Jälleen hän vaikeni ja katse kävi äkkiä
eloisammaksi. Hän kumartui eteenpäin tuijottaen tarkkaan, astahti ja
seisahti jälleen. Sitten pääsi häneltä hämmästyksen kirous ja sen
jälkeen äänekäs ja mielihyvää todistava nauru. »Kah, tämäpä on
kohtaus!» Hän sieppasi hatun päästänsä. »Käy välttämättömäksi
paljastaa päänsä.» Hän kumarsi. »Ja kuinka kauan olette ollutkaan
Corbalissa, rakas kirjurini?»
»Pysykää paikallanne!»
Ääni oli Corbalin, joka puhui niin kylmään ja terävään sävyyn, että
se tosiaan pysähdytti edusmiehen. Tämä jäykistyi katsellessaan
varakreiviä huoneen lattian poikki.
»Vielä uusi yllätys!» virkkoi hän. »Ja tämä teidän taholtanne, rakas
aatelissyntyinen! Minä en suinkaan sitä teiltä odottanut. Tähän asti te
olette ollut niin herttainen ja poikkeuksettoman kohtelias, etten olisi
suinkaan luullut teidän kykenevän tällaiseen karkeuteen. Miksi te
haluatte minua peloittaa?»
»Tappaa teidät.»
»Hieno erotus!»
»Te olette itse käsitellyt hienoja erotuksia jokseenkin vapaasti, kun
asia koski muiden tuskaa. Onpa oikein että mies joskus tyhjentää
maljan, jonka on täyttänyt.» Varakreivin kylmä jäykkyys ei juuri
jättänyt epäilystä hänen päätöksensä lujuudesta. Kääntämättä
katsettaan Chauvinièresta hän puhui mademoiselle de
Montsorbierelle. »Arvoisa neiti, saanko pyytää teitä poistumaan?»