ination , in fact , had already made them receptive to the
observations others would have missed , and the cause and effect stage represented only the last step in a long chain of imaginative hypotheses and experiments .
Criteria for Good Hypotheses
Regardless of type , causal or creative , the criteria for
good hypothesis are common to all .
1. They must be capable of being tested .
2. They must be susceptible to deductive reasoning and
logical inferences of their consequences ( including mathematical development of these consequences when possible ) .
3. They must not conflict with well - established laws
of nature .
4. They must be as simple at the facts permit .
Adherence to these rules will lead to more clearly
stated and more easily tested hypotheses . The most fre- quently violated rule is the last , for many hypotheses con- tain extraneous facts which may be interpreted falsely in analyzing experimental data . For instance , the causal hypothesis in the example on catalyst deactivation may have been stated :
"Temperature surges to approximately 1200 ° F , or
above , cause rapid deactivation of the Ni - Kieselguhr cata- lyst due to reduction of surface area ."
The added phrase in italics has complicated the original
simple statement . Experimental data which was taken only to settle the immediate problem is inadequate for
On The Argument by Analogy Author(s) : P. R. Wilson Source: Philosophy of Science, Vol. 31, No. 1 (Jan., 1964), Pp. 34-39 Published By: On Behalf of The Stable URL: Accessed: 13/12/2014 09:10