PERFORMANCE OF MAT (OR RAFT) FOUNDATIONS DUE TO

SETTLEMENT PROBLEM

ROZAIMI BIN MOHD NOOR

A project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the

Requirements for the award of the degree of
Master of Engineering (Civil-Geotechnics)

Faculty of Civil Engineering

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

OCTOBER 2009
 ABSTRAK

Penilaian tanah perlu dilakukan bagi mengetahui tentang kekuatan sebenar

keupayaan sesuatu tanah sebelum sebarang keputusan penukaran sistem asas sesuatu
bangunan dapat dilaksanakan. Kertas projek ini membincangkan isu berkaitan
penukaran sistem asas ‘piling’ kepada sistem asas rakit bagi sebuah blok asrama di
projek Asrama Berkelompok Yayasan Terengganu, Besut. Antara faktor lain yang
diambil kira adalah dari aspek kos dan masa. Aspek kos menjadi isu utama kepada
pemilik/klien sesuatu projek kerana ianya akan mempengaruhi budget yang telah
diperuntukkan. Manakala aspek masa pula akan menentukan tempoh pembinaan dapat
disiapkan, adakah lebih cepat atau sebaliknya yang akan menguntungkan pihak
kontraktor juga. Akhirnya aspek kejuruteraan geoteknikal akan dinilai untuk
memastikan kawasan kes tersebut boleh mengadaptasi perlaksanaan cadangan asas
yang baru tanpa melibatkan sebarang risiko kegagalan berkaitan dengan kekuatan
tanah.
 ABSTRACT

Soil evaluation must done to find out of real strength capacity before any
conversion decision is taken to change the foundation system of building. This project
paper discussed an issue relating foundation system conversion from ‘piling' to mat
(raft) system for a hostel block in the Project of Asrama Berkelompok Yayasan
Terengganu, Besut. Among other factors taken into account is from cost and time
aspect. Cost aspects be major issue to owners / a project client because it will affect
budget were appropriated. While time aspect also will determine able construction
period completed, do quicker or otherwise will benefit contractor also. Finally
geotechnical engineering aspect will be evaluated to be sure the case study can adapt a
new of foundation proposal to be implement without involving any risk of failing
relates to the strength of soil.
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER TITLE PAGE

TITLE PAGE i
DECLARATION ii
DEDIDATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLE x
LIST OF FIGURES xi
LIST OF SYMBOLS xiii
LIST OF APENDICES xv

I INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background 1
1.2 Problem Statement 3
1.3 Objective of the Study 4
1.4 Scope of the Study 4
II LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Computational Geotechnics and Soil – Foundation – Structure

Interaction 5
2.1.1 Introduction 5
2.1.2 PLAXIS 6
2.2 Analysis and Design of Mat (or Raft) Foundations 6
2.2.1 Advantages of Using Shallow 6
2.2.2 Disadvantages of Using Shallow 7
2.2.3 Combined Footing 7
2.2.4 Types of Mat Foundation (or Raft) Foundations 8
2.2.5 To Design a Mat (or Raft) Foundation 10
2.3 Bearing Capacity of Mat (or Raft) Foundations 11
2.3.1 Introduction 11
2.3.2 Major point for Bearing Capacity of Raft
(or Mat) Foundation 12
2.3.3 Calculation and Estimation Bearing Capacity of Mat
(or Raft) Foundation 14
2.4 Settlement of Mat (or Raft) Foundation 20
2.4.1 Introduction 20
2.4.2 Compressibility and Settlement 21
2.4.2.1 Estimation of Immediate Settlement in Soil 21
2.4.2.2 Elastic Properties and In Situ Parameters 25
2.4.5 Settlement Analysis 27
2.4.5.1 Stress Distribution in Subsurface Soils
Due to Foundation Loading 27
2.4.6 Calculation and Estimation Settlement
of Mat (or Raft) Foundations 30
2.4.6.1 Immediate Settlement 31
2.4.7 Compensated Foundation 34
III METHODOLOGY

3.1 Introduction 35
3.2 Data Acquisition 37
3.3 Data Analysis 39

IV CASE STUDY

4.1 Introduction 40
4.2 Soil Profile 41
4.3 Groundwater 44
4.4 Soil Properties 44

V RESULT AND DISCUSSION

5.1 Introduction 45
5.2 Analysis Using PLAXIS 46
5.2.1 Settlement Result from PLAXIS Analysis 46
5.3 Estimation of Allowable Bearing Capacity by
Empirical Methods. 63
5.3.1 Estimation of Bearing Capacity 63
5.3.1.1 Using Data from Mackintosh Probe 63
5.3.1.2 Result of Allowable Bearing Capacity
Based on Chart 64
5.3.1.3 Using Conversion Method 69
5.4 Estimation Bearing Capacity For Mat (or Raft) Foundation 74
5.4.1 Using Equation 2.12 74
5.4.2 Using Equation 2.9 76
5.5 Comparison Result 77
5.5.1 Comparison of Different Methodology
by Cost and Time 77
5.5.2 Bearing Capacity Comparison 78
VI CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 Conclusions 79
6.2 Recommendations 80

REFERENCES

APPENDIX
 CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND

A foundation is a structure that transfers loads to the earth. Foundations are

generally divided into two categories: shallow foundations (spread footing, rafts or mats)
and deep foundations (Piles, Drilled Shaft, Soil Columns, Cassions).

The foundation is the part of an engineered system that transmits to, and into, the
underlying soil or rock the loads supported by the foundation and its, self-weight. The
resulting soil stresses except at the ground surface- are in addition to those presently
existing in the earth mass from its self-weight and geological history. The term
superstructure is commonly used to describe the engineered part of the system bringing
load to the foundation or substructure. The term superstructure has particular significance
for building, bridges, towers etc. For these reasons it is better to describe a foundation as
that part of the engineered system that interfaces the load-carrying components to the
ground. It is evident on the basis of this definition that a foundation is the most important
part of the engineering system.
 The amalgamation of experience, study of what others have done in somewhat
similar situations, and the site-specific geotechnical information to produce an
economical, practical and safe substructure design is application or engineering
judgment. Design parameters for shallow foundations fall into two classes; structural
design parameters and geotechnical design parameters. Structural Design Parameters that
influence the design of the shallow foundation include the building type and use, loading
(live, dead, and uplift), column spacing, presence or absence of a basement, allowable,
settlement and applicable building codes. Geotechnical factor that influence the design
include the thickness and lateral extent of bearing strata the depth of frost penetration, the
depth of seasonal volume change and the cut fill requirements. The strength,
compressibility and shrink swell potential of the bearing strata are the properties of
concern. In addition the presence or absence of ground water and its minimum and
maximum elevations have an important impact on the design process.

The following steps are the minimum required for designing a foundation:

i. Locate the site and the position of load. A rough estimate of the foundation loads
is usually provided by the client or made in-house. Depending on the site or load
system complexity, a literature survey may be started to see how others have
approached similar problems.
ii. Physically inspect the site for any geological or other evidence that may indicate
a potential design problem that will have to be taken into account when making
the design or giving a design recommendation. Supplement this inspection with
any previously obtained soil data.
iii. Establish the field exploration program and, on the basis of discovery (or what is
found in the initial phase), set up the necessary supplemental field testing and any
laboratory test program.
iv. Determine the necessary soil design parameters based on integration of test data,
scientific principles, and engineering judgment. Simple or complex computer
analyses may be involved. For complex problems, compare the recommended
 data with published literature or engage another geotechnical consultant to give
an outside perspective to the results.

v. Design the foundation using the soil parameters from step (iv). The foundation
should be economical and be able to be built by the available construction
personnel. Take into account practical construction tolerances and local
construction practices. Interact closely with all concerned (client, engineers,
architect, contractor) so that the substructure system is not excessively over
designed and risk is kept within acceptable levels. A computer may be used
extensively (or not at all) in this step.

Normally, for building height 2 – 4 storey, the geotechnical engineer not involve
for foundation design. The structural engineer whose design overall the building. For
design the foundation, the structural engineers usually choose piles foundation for more
safety and not complicated especially using structural software design. Drawing
construction, the contractor more prefer shallow the foundation for more economical and
faster in construction. Thus, the characteristic and the strata of the soil at the site must
suitable for shallow foundation. For replacement piles foundation design to raft or mat
foundation design, the geotechnical engineer are challenged to suit this soil condition
suitable or not for raft or mat foundation.

1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT

Originally foundation design for Project 4 Storey Asrama Kelompok, Yayasan

Terengganu had used piling system. After project awarded to contractor, contractor
propose conversion of foundation system from piling to raft foundation with it reason
will be able to accelerate again building process later apart from cost factor can be saved
to client.

After client consented the proposal, then geotechnical engineer are challenge to
suit the Soil Condition are suitable for use the mat (or raft) foundations.
 To make sure the bearing capacity and settlement adequate.

1.3 OBJECTIVE OF STUDY

The objectives of this study are as follows:

i. To evaluate cost implications of the pile foundations and mat or raft foundations.

ii. Analysis numerical modeling (Using PLAXIS) to evaluate the settlement mat or
raft foundation in good agreement with actual performance.

iii. To obtaining adopted soil stiffness in soil condition.

1.4 SCOPE OF STUDY

The scope of the study includes several aspects as follows:

i. Study bearing capacity for raft foundation.

ii. Literature review on previous factor settlement in raft foundation.

iii. Suggestion using raft foundation for certain soil properties.

iv. Calculation for comparison cost estimate between pile foundation and raft
foundation.
 REFERENCES

Bowles, Joseph E (1996), Foundation Analysis and Design, 5thEd, Mc-Graw Hill International
Edition

Donald P. Coduto Donald P, (2001), Foundation Design Principles and Practices Second
Edition, Prentice Hall

Manjriker Gunaratne (2006). The Foundation Engineering Hand Book. Taylor and Francis

Whitlow, R. (2001). Basic Soil Mechanic 4th Edition. Prentice Hall

Nurly Gofar and Khairul Anuar Kasim (2007).Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering Part II,
Pearson / Prentice Hall

Braja M. Das (2000). Foundations of Geotechnical Engineering, Brooks / Cole.

Braja M. Das (2000). Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering, Brooks / Cole

Robert Wade Brown (2001), Practical Foundation Engineering Handbook, 2nd Edition, . Mc-
Graw Hill

Plaxis 2D, Tutorial Manual Version 9

Soil Investigation Report for Project Asrama Kelompok Yayasan Terengganu, Besut.
( Handalan Enterprise Sdn. Bhd.)

Program Latihan Untuk JKR, Pembinaan Asas Cetek, Ikram Sdn. Bhd.