In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.
Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 13) Title of Presentation: Cutomer Churn Prediction for an E-Commerce Platform
Presenter Number and Name: 1229890 Arsalan Ali
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 1.5 The proposal provides a high-level weaknesses of this proposal? overview but lacks specifics about the types of data sources, tools, and technologies to be used. What do you think were the 2 2 The proposal provides a comprehensive strengths of this research overview of the key steps involved in proposal? tackling customer churn, making it a valuable starting point for planning such a project. How would you suggest this 2 1.5 Specify the sources of data, such as proposal be improved? transaction logs, website analytics, and customer databases. Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear questions of this area of objectives for the area of research, research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 9.5 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 13) Title of Presentation:
Presenter Number and Name: 1229890 Zian Ali
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 1.5 The proposal provides a high-level weaknesses of this proposal? overview but lacks specifics about the types of data sources, tools, and technologies to be used. What do you think were the 2 2 The proposal provides a comprehensive strengths of this research overview of the key steps involved in proposal? tackling customer churn, making it a valuable starting point for planning such a project. How would you suggest this 2 1.5 Specify the sources of data, such as proposal be improved? transaction logs, website analytics, and customer databases. Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear questions of this area of objectives for the area of research. research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 9.5 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 31) Title of Presentation: NLP-based video text analysis, explanation and content generation
Presenter Number and Name: 1170915 Somayeh Goli
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 2 It's essential to consider ethical issues weaknesses of this proposal? related to video content analysis, especially if sensitive or private information is involved. What do you think were the 2 1 Outline the research objectives clearly. strengths of this research proposal? How would you suggest this 2 1 Provide a detailed description of the proposal be improved? research methodology, including data collection methods Does the presenter explain the 5 4 it does not specify research questions objectives and research explicitly. questions of this area of research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 8 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 30) Title of Presentation: Network Security Monitoring
Presenter Number and Name: 1213644 Preyansh Joshi
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 2 There may be insufficient information weaknesses of this proposal? about the research methodology, data collection. What do you think were the 2 1.5 Demonstrating the relevance of the strengths of this research research to a specific field, problem. proposal? How would you suggest this 2 2 Identify potential risks or challenges proposal be improved? that could affect the research project. Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear questions of this area of objectives. research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 10 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 30 ) Title of Presentation: Network Security Monitoring
Presenter Number and Name: 1231011 Jeet Shelat
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 2 There may be insufficient information weaknesses of this proposal? about the research methodology, data collection. What do you think were the 2 1.5 Demonstrating the relevance of the strengths of this research research to a specific field, problem. proposal? How would you suggest this 2 2 Identify potential risks or challenges proposal be improved? that could affect the research project. Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear questions of this area of objectives. research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 10 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group ) Title of Presentation: AI based Rock Paper Scissors
Presenter Number and Name: 1223466 Rahul Shah
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 2 Not any. weaknesses of this proposal? What do you think were the 2 2 Good model choice. strengths of this research proposal? How would you suggest this 2 1.5 Acknowledges potential risks and proposal be improved? challenges Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear questions of this area of objectives. research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 10 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 39) Title of Presentation: Sentiment Analysis in E-commerece business using machine learning
Presenter Number and Name: 1218362 Fayaz Khan
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 1.5 Failing to address ethical weaknesses of this proposal? considerations. What do you think were the 2 1.5 Not any. strengths of this research proposal? How would you suggest this 2 2 They can mention how they will collect proposal be improved? the data. Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 Presentation was clear but missing objectives and research ethical consideration. questions of this area of research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 9.5 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 39) Title of Presentation: Sentiment Analysis in E-commerece business using machine learning
Presenter Number and Name: 1230098 Waheed
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 1.5 Failing to address ethical weaknesses of this proposal? considerations. What do you think were the 2 1.52 Not any. strengths of this research proposal? How would you suggest this 2 2 They can mention how they will collect proposal be improved? the data. Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 Presentation was clear but missing objectives and research ethical consideration. questions of this area of research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 9.5 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 6) Title of Presentation: Comparision of KNN, Weighted KNN, and SVM for context based Resume Screening.
Presenter Number and Name: 1223512 Jithin Reji
Participant Number and Name: 1188014 Yash Amethiya
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 2 Not any. weaknesses of this proposal? What do you think were the 2 1.5 Good Objective and research question. strengths of this research proposal? How would you suggest this 2 1.5 They can use more than three proposal be improved? algorithims for comparisions. Does the presenter explain the 5 5 The initial proposal mentioned in the objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear questions of this area of objectives. research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 10 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 6) Title of Presentation: Comparision of KNN, Weighted KNN, and SVM for context based Resume Screening.
Presenter Number and Name: 1222198 Thanesh
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 2 Not any. weaknesses of this proposal? What do you think were the 2 1.5 Good Objective and research question. strengths of this research proposal? How would you suggest this 2 1.5 They can use more than three proposal be improved? algorithims for comparisions. Does the presenter explain the 5 5 The initial proposal mentioned in the objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear questions of this area of objectives. research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 10 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 3) Title of Presentation: American sign language recognition system using convolutional neural Network
Presenter Number and Name: 1209429 Sai Asritha Kunduru
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 1.5 The availability and quality of the weaknesses of this proposal? dataset are critical for training an effective ASL recognition model. What do you think were the 2 2 A well-developed proposal outlines the strengths of this research research methodology, including data proposal? collection methods How would you suggest this 2 1 Clearly articulate how your research proposal be improved? builds upon or differs from prior work Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 Research questions should be more objectives and research concise, well-defined, and directly questions of this area of related to the objectives research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 9 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 3) Title of Presentation: American sign language recognition system using convolutional neural Network
Presenter Number and Name: 1216604 Gowthami
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 1.5 The availability and quality of the weaknesses of this proposal? dataset are critical for training an effective ASL recognition model. What do you think were the 2 2 A well-developed proposal outlines the strengths of this research research methodology, including data proposal? collection methods How would you suggest this 2 1 Clearly articulate how your research proposal be improved? builds upon or differs from prior work Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 Research questions should be more objectives and research concise, well-defined, and directly questions of this area of related to the objectives. research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 9 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 26) Title of Presentation: Diagnosing Parkinson’s Disease using Machine Learning
Presenter Number and Name: 1214537 Hitarth Panchal
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 2 lack clarity regarding the specific weaknesses of this proposal? objectives of the research. What do you think were the 2 1.5 Background and context of the research strengths of this research Was clearly explained. proposal? How would you suggest this 2 2 Provide a detailed and comprehensive proposal be improved? explanation of the research methodology. Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear questions of this area of objectives. research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 10 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 26) Title of Presentation: Diagnosing Parkinson’s Disease using Machine Learning
Presenter Number and Name: 1229894 Jatin Patel
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 2 lack clarity regarding the specific weaknesses of this proposal? objectives of the research. What do you think were the 2 1.5 Background and context of the research strengths of this research Was clearly explained. proposal? How would you suggest this 2 2 Provide a detailed and comprehensive proposal be improved? explanation of the research methodology. Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear questions of this area of objectives. research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 10 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 24) Title of Presentation: Solar Power Forecasting
Presenter Number and Name: 1217458 Vaibhav Parikh
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 2 Not any. weaknesses of this proposal? What do you think were the 2 1.5 The research methodology was strengths of this research explained clearly. proposal? How would you suggest this 2 2 I suggest that they should mention proposal be improved? more challenges and consider it. Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The presentation was excellent, and the objectives and research statistics used to demonstrate the questions of this area of current state of the study field were research clearly? Was their any extensive. originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 10 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 24) Title of Presentation: Solar Power Forecasting
Presenter Number and Name: Saurav Patel 1220888
Participant Number and Name: Raj Patel 1190070
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 2 Not any. weaknesses of this proposal? What do you think were the 2 1.5 The research methodology was strengths of this research explained clearly. proposal? How would you suggest this 2 2 I suggest that they should mention proposal be improved? more challenges and consider it. Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The presentation was excellent, and the objectives and research statistics used to demonstrate the questions of this area of current state of the study field were research clearly? Was their any extensive. originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 10 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 8) Title of Presentation: Enhancing rice crop pest detection with deep learning
Presenter Number and Name: 1229868 Anjali Patel
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 2 Does not address the availability and weaknesses of this proposal? quality of the dataset to be used. What do you think were the 2 1 clear and well-defined research strengths of this research objectives. proposal? How would you suggest this 2 1 They should mention more about proposal be improved? database. Does the presenter explain the 5 5 The objective and research questions objectives and research are well planned and discussed. questions of this area of research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 9 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal. In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research. Presenter Evaluation Form COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science Research proposal: First Presentation (Group ) Title of Presentation: Enhancing rice crop pest detection with deep learning
Presenter Number and Name: 1229712 Supprethaa Shankar
Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel
Criteria Max Given Justification
Points Points What do you think were the 2 2 Does not address the availability and weaknesses of this proposal? quality of the dataset to be used. What do you think were the 2 1 clear and well-defined research strengths of this research objectives. proposal? How would you suggest this 2 1 They should mention more about proposal be improved? database. Does the presenter explain the 5 5 The objective and research questions objectives and research are well planned and discussed. questions of this area of research clearly? Was their any originality (i.e. work planned to be accomplished which has not been done previously). Total 11 9 This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance the speaker future research proposal.