In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the

subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 13)
Title of Presentation: Cutomer Churn Prediction for an E-Commerce Platform

Presenter Number and Name: 1229890 Arsalan Ali

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

What do you think were the
weaknesses of this proposal?
What do you think were the
strengths of this research
proposal?
How would you suggest this
proposal be improved?
Does the presenter explain the
objectives and research
questions of this area of
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total
Points Points
2 1.5 The proposal provides a high-level
overview but lacks specifics about the
types of data sources, tools, and
technologies to be used.
2 2 The proposal provides a comprehensive
overview of the key steps involved in
tackling customer churn, making it a
valuable starting point for planning such
a project.
2 1.5 Specify the sources of data, such as
transaction logs, website analytics, and
customer databases.
5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the
earlier conversation provides clear
objectives for the area of research,
11 9.5
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 13)
Title of Presentation:

Presenter Number and Name: 1229890 Zian Ali

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

What do you think were the
weaknesses of this proposal?
What do you think were the
strengths of this research
proposal?
How would you suggest this
proposal be improved?
Does the presenter explain the
objectives and research
questions of this area of
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total
Points Points
2 1.5 The proposal provides a high-level
overview but lacks specifics about the
types of data sources, tools, and
technologies to be used.
2 2 The proposal provides a comprehensive
overview of the key steps involved in
tackling customer churn, making it a
valuable starting point for planning such
a project.
2 1.5 Specify the sources of data, such as
transaction logs, website analytics, and
customer databases.
5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the
earlier conversation provides clear
objectives for the area of research.
11 9.5
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 31)
Title of Presentation: NLP-based video text analysis, explanation and content generation

Presenter Number and Name: 1170915 Somayeh Goli

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 2 It's essential to consider ethical issues
weaknesses of this proposal? related to video content analysis,
especially if sensitive or private
information is involved.
What do you think were the 2 1 Outline the research objectives clearly.
strengths of this research
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 1 Provide a detailed description of the
proposal be improved? research methodology, including data
collection methods
Does the presenter explain the 5 4 it does not specify research questions
objectives and research explicitly.
questions of this area of
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 8
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 30)
Title of Presentation: Network Security Monitoring

Presenter Number and Name: 1213644 Preyansh Joshi

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 2 There may be insufficient information
weaknesses of this proposal? about the research methodology, data
collection.
What do you think were the 2 1.5 Demonstrating the relevance of the
strengths of this research research to a specific field, problem.
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 2 Identify potential risks or challenges
proposal be improved? that could affect the research project.
Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the
objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear
questions of this area of objectives.
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 10
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 30 )
Title of Presentation: Network Security Monitoring

Presenter Number and Name: 1231011 Jeet Shelat

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 2 There may be insufficient information
weaknesses of this proposal? about the research methodology, data
collection.
What do you think were the 2 1.5 Demonstrating the relevance of the
strengths of this research research to a specific field, problem.
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 2 Identify potential risks or challenges
proposal be improved? that could affect the research project.
Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the
objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear
questions of this area of objectives.
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 10
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group )
Title of Presentation: AI based Rock Paper Scissors

Presenter Number and Name: 1223466 Rahul Shah

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 2 Not any.
weaknesses of this proposal?
What do you think were the 2 2 Good model choice.
strengths of this research
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 1.5 Acknowledges potential risks and
proposal be improved? challenges
Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the
objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear
questions of this area of objectives.
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 10
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 39)
Title of Presentation: Sentiment Analysis in E-commerece business using machine learning

Presenter Number and Name: 1218362 Fayaz Khan

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 1.5 Failing to address ethical
weaknesses of this proposal? considerations.
What do you think were the 2 1.5 Not any.
strengths of this research
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 2 They can mention how they will collect
proposal be improved? the data.
Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 Presentation was clear but missing
objectives and research ethical consideration.
questions of this area of
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 9.5
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 39)
Title of Presentation: Sentiment Analysis in E-commerece business using machine learning

Presenter Number and Name: 1230098 Waheed

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 1.5 Failing to address ethical
weaknesses of this proposal? considerations.
What do you think were the 2 1.52 Not any.
strengths of this research
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 2 They can mention how they will collect
proposal be improved? the data.
Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 Presentation was clear but missing
objectives and research ethical consideration.
questions of this area of
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 9.5
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 6)
Title of Presentation: Comparision of KNN, Weighted KNN, and SVM for context based
Resume Screening.

Presenter Number and Name: 1223512 Jithin Reji

Participant Number and Name: 1188014 Yash Amethiya

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 2 Not any.
weaknesses of this proposal?
What do you think were the 2 1.5 Good Objective and research question.
strengths of this research
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 1.5 They can use more than three
proposal be improved? algorithims for comparisions.
Does the presenter explain the 5 5 The initial proposal mentioned in the
objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear
questions of this area of objectives.
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 10
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 6)
Title of Presentation: Comparision of KNN, Weighted KNN, and SVM for context based
Resume Screening.

Presenter Number and Name: 1222198 Thanesh

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 2 Not any.
weaknesses of this proposal?
What do you think were the 2 1.5 Good Objective and research question.
strengths of this research
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 1.5 They can use more than three
proposal be improved? algorithims for comparisions.
Does the presenter explain the 5 5 The initial proposal mentioned in the
objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear
questions of this area of objectives.
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 10
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 3)
Title of Presentation: American sign language recognition system using convolutional
neural Network

Presenter Number and Name: 1209429 Sai Asritha Kunduru

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

What do you think were the
weaknesses of this proposal?
What do you think were the
strengths of this research
proposal?
How would you suggest this
proposal be improved?
Does the presenter explain the
objectives and research
questions of this area of
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total
Points Points
2 1.5 The availability and quality of the
dataset are critical for training an
effective ASL recognition model.
2 2 A well-developed proposal outlines the
research methodology, including data
collection methods
2 1 Clearly articulate how your research
builds upon or differs from prior work
5 4.5 Research questions should be more
concise, well-defined, and directly
related to the objectives
11 91
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 3)
Title of Presentation: American sign language recognition system using convolutional
neural Network

Presenter Number and Name: 1216604 Gowthami

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

What do you think were the
weaknesses of this proposal?
What do you think were the
strengths of this research
proposal?
How would you suggest this
proposal be improved?
Does the presenter explain the
objectives and research
questions of this area of
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total
Points Points
2 1.5 The availability and quality of the
dataset are critical for training an
effective ASL recognition model.
2 2 A well-developed proposal outlines the
research methodology, including data
collection methods
2 1 Clearly articulate how your research
builds upon or differs from prior work
5 4.5 Research questions should be more
concise, well-defined, and directly
related to the objectives.
11 9
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 26)
Title of Presentation: Diagnosing Parkinson’s Disease using Machine Learning

Presenter Number and Name: 1214537 Hitarth Panchal

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 2 lack clarity regarding the specific
weaknesses of this proposal? objectives of the research.
What do you think were the 2 1.5 Background and context of the research
strengths of this research Was clearly explained.
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 2 Provide a detailed and comprehensive
proposal be improved? explanation of the research
methodology.
Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the
objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear
questions of this area of objectives.
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 10
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 26)
Title of Presentation: Diagnosing Parkinson’s Disease using Machine Learning

Presenter Number and Name: 1229894 Jatin Patel

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 2 lack clarity regarding the specific
weaknesses of this proposal? objectives of the research.
What do you think were the 2 1.5 Background and context of the research
strengths of this research Was clearly explained.
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 2 Provide a detailed and comprehensive
proposal be improved? explanation of the research
methodology.
Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The initial proposal mentioned in the
objectives and research earlier conversation provides clear
questions of this area of objectives.
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 10
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 24)
Title of Presentation: Solar Power Forecasting

Presenter Number and Name: 1217458 Vaibhav Parikh

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 2 Not any.
weaknesses of this proposal?
What do you think were the 2 1.5 The research methodology was
strengths of this research explained clearly.
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 2 I suggest that they should mention
proposal be improved? more challenges and consider it.
Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The presentation was excellent, and the
objectives and research statistics used to demonstrate the
questions of this area of current state of the study field were
research clearly? Was their any extensive.
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 10
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 24)
Title of Presentation: Solar Power Forecasting

Presenter Number and Name: Saurav Patel 1220888

Participant Number and Name: Raj Patel 1190070

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 2 Not any.
weaknesses of this proposal?
What do you think were the 2 1.5 The research methodology was
strengths of this research explained clearly.
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 2 I suggest that they should mention
proposal be improved? more challenges and consider it.
Does the presenter explain the 5 4.5 The presentation was excellent, and the
objectives and research statistics used to demonstrate the
questions of this area of current state of the study field were
research clearly? Was their any extensive.
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 10
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group 8)
Title of Presentation: Enhancing rice crop pest detection with deep learning

Presenter Number and Name: 1229868 Anjali Patel

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 2 Does not address the availability and
weaknesses of this proposal? quality of the dataset to be used.
What do you think were the 2 1 clear and well-defined research
strengths of this research objectives.
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 1 They should mention more about
proposal be improved? database.
Does the presenter explain the 5 5 The objective and research questions
objectives and research are well planned and discussed.
questions of this area of
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 9
In the proposal, every research question should be well-motivated and answered relative to the
subsequently-described methods to be employed in the research.

Presenter Evaluation Form

COMP 5112, Research Methodology in Computer Science
Research proposal: First Presentation (Group )
Title of Presentation: Enhancing rice crop pest detection with deep learning

Presenter Number and Name: 1229712 Supprethaa Shankar

Participant Number and Name: 1190070 Raj Patel

This evaluation form is planned to offer speakers with productive feedback that will advance
the speaker future research proposal.

Criteria Max Given Justification

Points Points
What do you think were the 2 2 Does not address the availability and
weaknesses of this proposal? quality of the dataset to be used.
What do you think were the 2 1 clear and well-defined research
strengths of this research objectives.
proposal?
How would you suggest this 2 1 They should mention more about
proposal be improved? database.
Does the presenter explain the 5 5 The objective and research questions
objectives and research are well planned and discussed.
questions of this area of
research clearly? Was their any
originality (i.e. work planned to
be accomplished which has not
been done previously).
Total 11 9