Page 1

1
2
3 Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus 27-5-2024
4 Email attorney@ag.gov.au,
5
6 Cc: Mr Russell Broadbent MP for Monash, Vic, INDEPENDENT
7 Russell.Broadbent.MP@aph.gov.au
8
9 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
10 Re DIGITAL ID, etc
11 Sir,
12 I am aware that in general your lack of responding to my writings is appalling. However, do
13 keep in mind that my writings are creating a record that at a later time can be shown that you
14 miserably failed to appropriately deal with issues at hand. The same about the unconstitutional
15 “covid scam”.
16 Even if you were held not to have committed Misprision (concealing a felony) you might still be
17 held accountable for “malfeasance in public office” where numerous Australians were harmed
18 and many died due to the “covid scam”. After all you had an obligation to ensure the Federal
19 government did not violate Australians constitutional and other legal, humanitarian, natural and
20 common law rights.
21
22 I happen to watch a video of Mr Russell Broadbent, INDEPENDENT Member for Monash
23 Victoria, during an about 15-minute speech in the Parliament. In it he claimed that the Digital ID
24 is like a digital tattoo and that legislation states that one a person had a digital ID as is required to
25 be a Director, then even if a person is no longer a director the Digital ID will remain with the
26 person.
27
28 As I recall the Digital ID bill was forced through the Senate without allowing any proper
29 consideration by senators.
30
31 Hansard 2-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
32 Convention)
33 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
34 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the
35 observations to which I allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of
36 misconception.
37 END QUOTE
38
39 Hansard 9-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
40 QUOTE
41 Sir JOHN DOWNER.-I know that my right honorable friend, judging probably from
42 the time I am taking now, thinks that in such a case I would take a long time, if I were in
43 the Senate. I admit that his surmise is quite right in my case. I admit there are persons on
44 whom this terrorism could not be practised, or on whom, if practised, it would probably
27-5-2024 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 2

1 not be effective. But I am thinking of persons of weaker minds and wills, and I say that, as
2 far as this Constitution is concerned, it is absolutely necessary to put some provision in this
3 Bill which will strengthen the Senate and prevent it being intimidated in the way indicated.
4 We have been frittering away the first principles of the Federal Constitution long enough.
5 END QUOTE
6
7 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
8 QUOTE
9 Mr. DOBSON.-If it was perfectly plain that a small majority was infringing the
10 Constitution simply in order to coerce a minority, the law should be declared invalid.
11 END QUOTE
12
13 The Senators must be provided with sufficient time to debate any Bill placed before the Senate.
14 Any bill that affects the rights of Australians must be properly debated and not that it is
15 incompetently pushed through and then innocent Australian may have to be denied their
16 constitutional rights and lacking sufficient monies to litigate to regain constitutional rights may
17 be doomed forever. If ever any gross incompetence was shown it was with the “covid scam”!
18 How on earth can you have the former Minister for Health Greg Hunt claiming he was not
19 aware of the 5-kilometre mandate, etc. the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) clearly provide the
20 Minister for health with non-delegated powers. Here we had a Minister who seemed to have
21 been asleep on the job, while Australians were callously murdered, etc.!
22
23 It is my position that while the commonwealth may have certain legislative powers they are
24 always to be within the provisions of “for peace, order and good government”.
25 Where the Minister pursued that the Digital ID was not compulsory and yet Mr Broadbent
26 exposed that more than a $1,000,000.00 ($1 Million) fine can be given for a ‘Director’ not to
27 have a Digital ID but then it remains permanently with the person regardless of no longer being a
28 director in my view is unconstitutional, as it invades the constitutional rights of a person that the
29 Commonwealth cannot deal with “civil rights”, “political liberty”, “Religious liberty”, “property
30 ownership”, etc.
31 I also noted that Mr Broadbent stated that certain bills cannot be paid without a Digital ID. This
32 even so the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution act 1900 (UK) includes:
33
34 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK
35 QUOTE
36 115 States not to coin money
37 A State shall not coin money, nor make anything but gold and silver coin a legal tender
38 in payment of debts.
39 END QUOTE
40
41 Meaning digital Currency would violate Section 115, as the States are limited in pursuing gold
42 and silver coins as a manner of payment and the Commonwealth by this must provide gold and
43 silver coins. The RBA (Reserve Bank of Australia) is not an entity within the constitution as to
44 be able to blatantly disregard the true meaning and application of the legal principles embedded
45 in the constitution and therefore bound to ensure that cash in the forms of gold and silver coins
46 are available and the Banks must provide gold and silver coins to its account holders. Any bank
47 that fails/refuses to issue gold and silver coins to a customer must be deregistered as banks are
48 also bound by the provisions of the constitution!
49
50 Also, “bail-in” cannot be applied to any monies that the Commonwealth deposit into any account
51 of a pensioner/welfare recipients this because the monies are deposited for the use of the account
52 holder, and the bank cannot claim any ownership over the amount the bank account holder is
27-5-2024 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 3

1 entitled. It was the Federal Government that demanded that pensioners/welfare recipients were to
2 have a bank account so the issue of cheques would be stopped. And as such, the banks operating
3 under that system have no legal rights to deny any bank customer seeking to draw from their
4 pension/welfare payment monies to have this paid out in gold and silver coins.
5
6 Neither can the Commonwealth give consent to any bank to garnish monies held in other bank
7 accounts, this because the Commonwealth has no right to interfere with the “property” of any
8 Australian, other then for Commonwealth purposes such as acquisition of land for being able to
9 exercise Commonwealth required purposes, such as the armed forces, etc.
10
11 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK
12 QUOTE
13 (xxxi) the acquisition of property on just terms from any State or person for any purpose in
14 respect of which the Parliament has power to make laws;
15 END QUOTE
16
17 Any alleged “bail-in” is not for “public purposes” and as such the Commonwealth obligation is
18 to ensure that proper supervision, etc, is carried out to manage the affairs of banks (other than
19 State banks operating within the boundaries of a state).
20
21 I may also add that I understand that the Commonwealth is going to apply a family car taxation,
22 as it is known. While the commonwealth does have taxation powers superior to the states, it is
23 however limited in its taxation powers as to what purpose it implements a taxation for.
24 For example, to place a taxation on motor vehicles to force owners to purchase an EV (Electric
25 Vehicle) would be unconstitutional!
26
27 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
28 QUOTE Sir HENRY PARKES
29 It is an organism, as I have tried to explain, for protecting each individual citizen in the undisturbed
30 possession of his property, in the undisturbed possession of his liberty, and from my point of view the
31 expense of that government ought to be defrayed in the easiest manner and only to the extent which is
32 necessary for that purpose, and that taxation is unjustifiable for any other purpose whatever.
33 END QUOTE
34
35 Hansard 4-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
36 QUOTE
37 Mr. BARTON.-If my right honorable friend will look at sub-section (3) he will see that
38 it is not the state but the Commonwealth which has this option. Of course, the
39 Commonwealth, as a general rule, will not take over property except such as is to be
40 exclusively used for a service that has been transferred to it.
41 Sir JOHN FORREST.-The clause does not contain the words "with the consent of the
42 state."
43 Mr. BARTON.-That is so, but you cannot carry a, sale into effect without knowing the
44 price. The price is a condition to be determined before the sale is made.
45 Sir JOHN FORREST.-I thought that where property was not to be used exclusively
46 by the Commonwealth there was to be no absolute power in the Commonwealth to
47 take it over.
48 Mr. BARTON.-I understood that the feeling of the committee was that the
49 Commonwealth should have the option of saying whether it would or would not take over
50 any property, but that the state should be able to arrange with the Commonwealth as to the
51 price to be paid for any property taken over. If the parties cannot agree, the price is to be
52 determined according to the law of the state in regard to the acquisition of property for
53 public purposes.
27-5-2024 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 4

1 END QUOTE
2
3 Hansard 28-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
4 QUOTE
5 Mr. OCONNOR (New South Wales).-I think the honorable member who has last spoken
6 is quite right; but there is a great distinction between the two classes of matters dealt with
7 in this sub-section. I think that the seat of government of the Commonwealth ought to be in
8 quite a different position to such matters as the construction of forts, magazines, arsenals,
9 dockyards, and so on. Dr. Cockburn will recollect that there is no such power for the
10 acquisition of land for the ordinary public purposes of the Commonwealth.
11 Dr. COCKBURN.-Might not the power be included in the general powers of sub-section
12 (37)?
13 Mr. OCONNOR.-No. The only powers that can be held to be given are those which are
14 expressly given. It will be wise, later on, to add a clause which I think the Convention will
15 see the advisability of adding, restricting the power to acquire land to acquisition for the
16 public purposes of the Commonwealth; and I think it should then be made very clear that
17 no power is given in that clause to acquire land for a federal capital without the consent of
18 the state interested. Because it is quite clear, from the nature of things, that it is quite
19 impossible that a power of that kind could be carried out without such an amount of
20 friction and difficulty as might lead to a great deal of trouble.
21 END QUOTE
22
23 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
24 QUOTE
25 Mr. ISAACS.-The court would not consider whether it was an oversight or not.
26 They would take the law and ask whether it complied with the Constitution. If it did
27 not, they would say that it was invalid. They would not go into the question of what was
28 in the minds of the Members of Parliament when the law was passed. That would be a
29 political question which it would be impossible for the court to determine.
30 END QUOTE
31
32 HANSARD 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
33 QUOTE
34 Mr. HIGGINS.-I did not say that it took place under this clause, and the honorable
35 member is quite right in saying that it took place under the next clause; but I am trying to
36 point out that laws would be valid if they had one motive, while they would be invalid
37 if they had another motive.
38 END QUOTE
39
40 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
41 QUOTE
42 Mr. GLYNN.-I think they would, because it is fixed in the Constitution. There is no
43 special court, but the general courts would undoubtedly protect the states. What Mr. Isaacs
44 seeks to do is to prevent the question of ultra vires arising after a law has been passed.
45 [start page 2004]
46 Mr. ISAACS.-No. If it is ultra vires of the Constitution it would, of course, be invalid.
47 END QUOTE
48
49 Hansard 25-3-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
50 Australasian Convention)
51 QUOTE Mr. WISE:
52 Then as to the second class of dispute arising from social differences, all through this
53 discussion, not, I admit, in this house but outside, the controversialists of one party ignore,
54 or seem to ignore, the limitations of federal government. They forget that this
27-5-2024 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 5

1 commonwealth can only deal with those matters that are expressly remitted to its
2 jurisdiction; and excluded from its jurisdiction are all matters that affect civil rights,
3 all matters that affect property, all matters, in a word, affecting the two great objects
4 which stir the passions and affect the interests of mankind.
5 END QUOTE
6
7 Again:
8 They forget that this commonwealth can only deal
9 with those matters that are expressly remitted to its
10 jurisdiction; and excluded from its jurisdiction are
11 all matters that affect civil rights, all matters that
12 affect property, all matters, in a word, affecting the
13 two great objects which stir the passions and affect
14 the interests of mankind.
15
16 It is very clear that there is a conflict of interest with Julie Inman Grant being the eSafety
17 Commissioner for Australia to also being employed or work for the W.E.F. (world Economic
18 Forum) as to pursue W.E.F. global aspirations to control people around the world with Digital
19 ID, etc. The same with the WHO (World Health Organisation) as well as the U.N. (United
20 Nations).
21
22 Digital ID in my view clearly violates the rights of Australians! This as shown below also
23 Australians has a constitutional rights as to “political liberty” and religious liberty” and that
24 would be denied if the Commonwealth and/or any business such as corporations are using
25 Digital ID, including telecommunication companies, to trace with whom I have contact with.
26 After all the government may then use this to say cancel my Digital ID, if it doesn’t like with
27 who I communicate or what I were to write about, etc. Hence, I for one do not desire to use
28 Digital ID, and have neither used any QR code.
29
30 Actually, I highlight a recent US of A decision
31 “Wireless carriers fined $200 million for illegally sharing user locations”.
32 QUOTE

33
34 END QUOTE
35
36 I view the same should be with any company that uses the same tactic, like Coles, etc. Also, any
37 company like Optus, Medibank, etc, should be fined severely and forced to compensate

27-5-2024 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 6

1 customers for any breaches by hackers. After all I am the one having scams to my email address
2 because of the hacks with Optus and Medibank.
3
4 Also, this nonsense of Digital ID can be exposed in that how would such Digital ID work?
5 With the QR code of the unconstitutional State mandates I refused to use it, however others had
6 little or no choice to use it.
7
8 My 41-year-old son Mark a qualified motor mechanic was employed with PAC Group who then
9 placed him with Holden Port Melbourne (Fisherman Bend). Holden staff insisted he be jabbed
10 with the “covid vaccine” which really was a poisonous scam as it was a “gene therapy”
11 DEPOPULATION “bioweapon”!
12 Then after my son was forced to have the jabs without “informed consent” this as even now
13 know one really was informed as to all relevant issues governing the jab, and the jab was not at
14 all what was used for the “clinical trials” as I understand that Pfizer changed the content of the
15 jabs different than what was used for the “clinical trials”.
16 After my son was forced to have the jabs then Holden reduced its workforce and my son was
17 without a job. So much for getting the jab for keeping the job. And he became homeless due also
18 because of becoming ill from the jabs I understand getting Turbo Cancer. Anyhow, last month
19 my son was advised that he had 2 months to 2 years to live! However, as he lost his balance (he
20 is weak due to the illness) he broke a rib and fractured another rib (on X-rays) and was informed
21 he may have a mere a week to live if he has another episode as such.
22
23 I since January 2020 spend lot of time researching this “covid scam” so as to protect my (now)
24 91-year old wife, and on 8 April 2020 filed a complaint with the Victorian Ombudsman that the
25 State mandates were unconstitutional. I also on 13 April 2020 filed a complaint as such with the
26 Victorian Human Rights Commissioner, who never bothered to respond! IBAC responded
27 (regarding the complaint with the Victorian Ombudsman) that it was not of “public interest”. It
28 seems mass murder is not an issue of “public interest”?
29
30 My son had granted me to be the executor of his estate would he die and well I have ever intent
31 to hold everyone involved legally accountable!
32
33 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
34 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
35 I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step,
36 not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the
37 different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous
38 principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall be liable for any
39 arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any private person would be.
40 END QUOTE
41
42 The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL
43 RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
44 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
45 QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
46 the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual
47 citizen is entitled to claim that the federal government shall take under its protection
48 and secure to him.
49 END QUOTE
50
51 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
52 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-

27-5-2024 Page 6 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 7

1 What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious
2 liberty-the liberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably
3 aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a charter of
4 peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the peoples whom it will
5 embrace and unite.
6 END QUOTE
7 And
8 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
9 QUOTE
10 Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to
11 commit to the people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to
12 commit this new Magna Charta for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can
13 conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole history of the peoples of the
14 world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of Australia to
15 vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This
16 new charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
17 END QUOTE
18
19 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
20 QUOTE
21 Mr. BARTON.- Of course it will be argued that this Constitution will have been made by
22 the Parliament of the United Kingdom. That will be true in one sense, but not true in
23 effect, because the provisions of this Constitution, the principles which it embodies,
24 and the details of enactment by which those principles are enforced, will all have been
25 the work of Australians.
26 END QUOTE
27
28 Hansard 9-9-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
29 QUOTE
30 The Right Hon. G.H. REID: I strongly support the amendment for the reasons which my hon. and learned
31 friend has hinted at. This is an expression which would be more in place in the United States Constitution,
32 where treaties are dealt with by the President and the senate, than in the constitution of a colony within the
33 empire. The treaties made by her Majesty are not binding as laws on the people of the United Kingdom,
34 and there is no penalty for disobeying them. Legislation is sometimes passed to give effect to treaties,
35 but the treaties themselves are not laws, and indeed nations sometimes find them inconvenient, as they
36 neglect them very seriously without involving any important legal consequences. The expression, I think,
37 ought to be omitted. I will deal with the other suggested amendments when the time comes.
38 END QUOTE
39
40 Hansard2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates;
41 QUOTE Dr. QUICK.-
42 The Constitution empowers the Federal Parliament to deal with certain external affairs, among which
43 would probably be the right to negotiate for commercial treaties with foreign countries, in the same way as
44 Canada has negotiated for such treaties. These treaties could only confer rights and privileges upon the
45 citizens of the Commonwealth, because the Federal Government, in the exercise of its power, [start
46 page 1753] could only act for and on behalf of its citizens.
47 END QUOTE
48
49 I understand that the federal government desires that even with babies their DNA and biometrics
50 are recorded but again this I view is outside the legislative powers of the Commonwealth. It is
51 not of your darn business either.
52
53 I understand that not long-ago defence contractors were hacked and that may underline that the
54 Commonwealth has no secure system and don’t give the crap it will be secure in future because
55 that is the mantra too often pushed by braindead politicians. After all who can forget the

27-5-2024 Page 7 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 8

1 elaborate “covid scam” “safe and effective” so called vaccines that really were USA DOJ “gene
2 therapy” DEPOPULATION “bioweapon” jabs to try to kill of most of the world’s population
3
4 1974/12/10 – Secretary of State Henry Kissenger’s national
5 Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) study
6 completed as the Kissinger Report, establishing global
7 depopulation as US geopolitical strategy.
8
9
10
11 1975/11/26 – President Gerald Ford endorsed the Kissinger Report’s depopulation
12 plan through National Security Decision Memorandum 314
13
14 Yes, it has been the USA policy for about 50 years to mass murder people around the world.
15
16 Actually, there is this video:
17
18 50 Insane Facts About the CIA You Never Knew
19

20
21
22 It is about how the CIA (former CIC) has been unconstitutionally/unlawfully engaged in mass
23 murder, bioweapon research upon humans, etc. With the “covid scam” “safe and effective” so
24 called vaccines “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION “bioweapon” jabs Australia was on the
25 forefront to terrorise Australians they had to be jabbed regardless that neither the Commonwealth
26 or the States/Territories had any such legislative powers. You may question how on earth none
27 can have legislative powers but that is because the commonwealth has Quarantine powers and
28 since it legislated in 1908 the Quarantine Act, it can only petition a court, who then has to hear
29 both sides, to order a person to be jabbed. The States in 1908 lost this legislative powers as once
30 the Commonwealth legislated the States had to retire from this.
31
32 Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
33 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
34 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd
35 clause, is intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any
36 quarantine. That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
37 END QUOTE
38
39 Hansard 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
40 QUOTE
41 Mr. BARTON.-I was going to explain when I was interrupted that the moment the
42 Commonwealth legislates on this subject the power will become exclusive.
43 END QUOTE
44
45 Hansard 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
46 QUOTE
47 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-If this is left as an exclusive power the laws of the
48 states will nevertheless remain in force under clause 100.
49 Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?
27-5-2024 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 9

1 Mr. BARTON.-Not after this power of legislation comes into force. Their existing laws
2 will, however, remain. If this is exclusive they can make no new laws, but the necessity of
3 making these new laws will be all the more forced on the Commonwealth.
4 END QUOTE
5
6 Hansard 7-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
7 QUOTE Mr. HOWE.-
8 My only desire is to give power to the Federal Parliament to achieve a scheme for old-age
9 pensions if it be practicable, and if the people require it. No power would be taken away
10 from the states. The sub-section would not interfere with the right of any state to act in the
11 meantime until the Federal Parliament took the matter in hand.
12 END QUOTE
13
14 We have already seen the terrorism upon Australians with the unconstitutional “No Jab No Pay”
15 scheme. And albeit unconstitutionally we now have the Federal Government involved with
16 foreign enemy forces such as the W.E.F., U.N., WHO, etc, as to provide confidential details of
17 Australians to them, I understand likewise so has DNA details obtained by swabs been provide
18 to Chinese companies, etc.
19
20 As such when it comes to NATIONAL SECURITY the Federal Government is likely the worst
21 offender to violate this.
22
23 We had the nonsense about businesses denying customers to enter their stores because they were
24 not proving to be jabbed with the “covid scam” “safe and effective” so called vaccines “gene
25 therapy” DEPOPULATION “bioweapon” jabs this even so those business were violate
26 Australians their constitutional rights but were pressured by State/Territory and Commonwealth
27 government to act as such.
28
29 https://viroliegy.com/2021/10/04/the-infectious-myth-busted-part-2-how-are-viruses-trans
30 The Infectious Myth Busted Part 2: How are “Viruses” Transmitted? They don’t know.
31
32 https://viroliegy.com/2021/10/03/the-infectious-myth-busted-part-1-the-rosenau-spanish-
33 flu-experiments-1918/
34 The Infectious Myth Busted Part 1: The Rosenau Spanish Flu Experiments (1918)
35
36 https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/the-contagion-myth-failure-to-demonstrate-
37 transmission-of-viral-diseases-a-complete-study-guide/
38 The Contagion Myth: Failure to Demonstrate Transmission of “Viral” Diseases. A
39 Complete Study Guide
40
41 https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/viruses-do-not-exist-in-nature/
42 Viruses Do Not Exist In Nature
43
44 https://viroliegy.com/2023/11/10/inventing-the-nature-of-viruses/
45 Inventing the Nature of “Viruses”
46
47 https://www.globalresearch.ca/lockdowns/5853276
48 Four Years Ago. Remember to The Lockdowns. Everything About Covid Was False
49 Mar 28, 2024
50
51 https://www.globalresearch.ca/biggest-lie-in-world-history-the-data-base-is-flawed-there-
52 never-was-a-pandemic-the-covid-mandates-including-the-vaccine-are-invalid/5772008
27-5-2024 Page 9 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 10

1 March 11, 2020, Biggest Lie in World History: There Never Was A Pandemic. The Data
2 Base is Flawed. The Covid Mandates including the Vaccine are Invalid
3 The PCR "Covid-19 Confirmed Cases" are Meaningless. The Multibillion Dollar Antigen and
4 Home Test Project is Fake
5
6 https://www.globalresearch.ca/uk-lawmaker-stuns-parliament-call-members-covid-cabal-
7 face-death-penalty/5852521
8 UK Lawmaker Stuns Parliament with Call for Members of the ‘COVID Cabal’ to
9 Face Death Penalty
10
11 https://www.globalresearch.ca/driving-under-influence-mrna-collapsing-crashing-your-car-
12 while-covid-19-vaccinated/5852662
13 Driving Under the Influence of mRNA: Collapsing and Crashing Your Car While
14 COVID-19 Vaccinated
15
16 Below is a quotation of litigation to hold those in the USA legally accountable for their
17 involvement in the “covid scam” and I pursue this also in the Commonwealth of Australia!
18
19 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/is-justice-coming-victims-covid-wrongful-
20 deaths/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=the-gateway-
21 pundit&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=2024-03-31
22 Is Justice Coming For Victims of COVID Wrongful Deaths?
23
24 It should be very clear that because of the biosecurity Act 2015 the States/Territories had
25 therefore no legislative powers as to any mandates!
26
27 The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL
28 RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
29 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
30 Australasian Convention)
31 QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
32 the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual
33 citizen is entitled to claim that the federal government shall take under its protection
34 and secure to him.
35 END QUOTE
36
37 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
38 QUOTE
39 Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?
40
41 Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law,
42 every member of a state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state
43 Parliament will be a sentry.
44 As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a
45 sentry, and the whole constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
46 END QUOTE
47
48 Then where you and fellow Members of Parliament to ensure Australians were protected? Where
49 you such a coward that you rather kept silent and let Australians be harmed and even die then to
50 have the balls to speak up as you should have done for fellow Australians?
51
52 And obviously with the push to get everyone jabbed the “Digital ID” is critical as after all you
53 unconstitutionally are serving a foreign enemy master of the W.E.F.
27-5-2024 Page 10 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 11

1
2 I not long ago went to the Government website to find out some “general” information but was
3 require to log in, this I refused, as it is none of the government’s business if I seek to obtain
4 publicly available details. Don’t give me the crap that this is to provide better services because it
5 is simply invading my privacy. As long as I was not seeking to obtain persons information there
6 should be no restriction to access information from the government website.
7
8 I understand that in China people have been forced to have Digital ID and for example if a
9 family member is deemed to violate a rule then other family members can be punished for this
10 by using the Digital ID to perhaps deny family members to use public transport or whatever.
11
12 Let say I want a secret meeting with a Member of Parliament to discuss serious matters but the
13 Digital ID would prevent this because the government and whomever has access to this system
14 would be able to know who I was meeting with. This would also wipe out journalist
15 confidentiality as well as that for lawyers who m,ay desire to in confidential talk not only with
16 their client but also possible witnesses, because everyone now will be monitored.
17 The Digital ID could be used to suspend the Digital ID of say a judge if he makes a ruling that
18 the Government of the Day doesn’t agree with, as to teach judges they better provide ruling that
19 the Government of the Day find acceptable or the judge and perhaps his family will all have their
20 Digital ID suspended. And well, with a suspension of Digital ID then so might be any access to a
21 person’s bank account, etc.
22 In The Netherlands the farmers went of a huge protest and farmers in other countries joined in
23 that the EU had to reduce their taxes, etc. With Digital ID the government can simply suspend
24 every protesters Digital ID and well every protester then can be left any access no monies,
25 without being able to use public transport, etc. Let for argument sake that take it that the
26 government (some bureaucrat) decides that some farmer has not sufficiently reduced the climate
27 change demanded requirements and so suspend the farmers Digital ID and well the farmer
28 unaware travels to a town to get supplies and then discover that the Digital ID is suspended and
29 so cannot pay for anything, not even for fuel to go home! Neither for supplied for the family!
30 That is the danger with Digital ID.
31 And do not give the crap it will be “voluntarily” as we had the same sheer and utter deceptive
32 nonsense about the so called “covid scam” covid-19 vaccines. I wrote extensively about this
33 that pharmaceutical companies were pushing for the mandates and to deny people the right to
34 work if they were not jabbed and subsequently this was followed up with the mandates. Proving
35 that the Federal government was acting as directed by the foreign enemy powers! And that made
36 them all in my view TRAITORS. And as we know from the GST issue, time and time again
37 governments are pushing to change it, and so “voluntarily” provisions can be changed at any
38 time.
39
40 The Digital ID is for control freaks to try to control every citizens. Those control freaks do forget
41 that there will be the day they no longer are in power and they and their family members may
42 then suffer the consequences also of the evil they terrorised Australians with.
43
44 While you may hold that you can always get the States to simply refer its legislative powers to
45 the Commonwealth, the problem with this is that the States cannot do so unless a State
46 referendum approves this. No such thing as the States unilaterally referring legislative powers to
47 the Commonwealth, this is also because of the “separation of powers”. When the state refers
48 legislative powers to the Commonwealth this also then includes to reduce the original judicial
49 powers of the State Supreme Court, and this no parliament can do! As such a state referendum
50 would be needed to permit this reference of legislative powers.
51
27-5-2024 Page 11 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 12

1 HANSARD 10-03-1891 Constitution Convention Debates

2 QUOTE
3 Dr. COCKBURN: All our experience hitherto has been under the condition of
4 parliamentary sovereignty. Parliament has been the supreme body. But when we embark
5 on federation we throw parliamentary sovereignty overboard. Parliament is no longer
6 supreme. Our parliaments at present are not only legislative, but constituent bodies. They
7 have not only the power of legislation, but the power of amending their constitutions. That
8 must disappear at once on the abolition of parliamentary sovereignty. No parliament
9 under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to have the power of
10 changing its constitution at its own will. Again, instead of parliament being supreme, the
11 parliaments of a federation are coordinate bodies-the main power is split up, instead of
12 being vested in one body. More than all that, there is this difference: When parliamentary
13 sovereignty is dispensed with, instead of there being a high court of parliament, you bring
14 into existence a powerful judiciary which towers above all powers, legislative and
15 executive, and which is the sole arbiter and interpreter of the constitution.
16 END QUOTE
17
18 As French J of WA (later French CJ of HCA) made clear Ss51(xxxvii) only provides legislative
19 powers for the Commonwealth to accept referral of legislative powers but the States to refer
20 legislative powers to the Commonwealth must be found elsewhere.
21
22 Well that is by way of State referendum! It means, that any purported reference of legislative
23 powers by any State not approved by the State electors in a State referendum never had any
24 constitutional validity! The same with the purported Victoria Constitution Act 1975, the
25 Queensland Constitution Act 2001, etc. As far as I am aware the State of Victoria Constitution
26 Act 1855 subject to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)was never
27 published in the Gazette. Let me remind you that the Supreme Court of Victoria threw out of the
28 window all charges against the albert park protestors because the relevant purported legislation
29 had not been published in the Gazette.
30
31 I understand that recently an aid worker was killed in Gaza and we have so to say Foreign
32 Affairs Minister Penny Wong and others going on and on about this. For sure, any death in time
33 of war is regrettable, in particularly involving civilians, but let us not be grandstanding. Where
34 was Penny Wong and others when Australian troops unconstitutionally invaded Afghanistan,
35 Iraq, etc? Then untold civilians were killed and where was the legal accountability of Australian
36 politicians involved in this unconstitutional invasion?
37
38 Despite my objections since at least 2001 that “council rates” were unconstitutional not a single
39 politician or official ever contact me to consider this matter properly.
40
41 As ES&a lawyers didn’t provide an email address, I forward it via their client
42 (Buloke Shire Council), indicating they have no legal standing to litigate against me,
43 etc.
44 You can download the document from:
45 https://www.scribd.com/document/735676639/20240524-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
46 B-to-ES-a-Lawyers-Ors-Re-Misprision-of-Felony-Etc
47
48 37-0114 No 1
49 QUOTE Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the Treasurer NSW on 2
50 March 2011
51 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+
52 Barry+Collier+MP+Parliamentarian+Secretary+Assisting+the+Treasurer+NSW+on+2+M
27-5-2024 Page 12 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 13

1 arch+2011+claimed+%28to+me%29+that+the+States+had+legislative+powers+regarding
2 +land+taxation+returned+to+them%3F+Do+you+accept+this+is+possible+when+the+con
3 stitution+doesn’t+provide+for+this+mechanism+to+return+exclusive+Commonwealth+po
4 wer+back+to+the+States%3F
5 Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the
6 Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed (to me) that the States had legislative
7 powers regarding land taxation returned to them? Do you accept this is possible when
8 the constitution doesn’t provide for this mechanism to return exclusive
9 Commonwealth power back to the States?
10
11 According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:
12 Answer:
13 No, it is not possible for the States to have legislative powers regarding land taxation
14 returned to them if the Constitution does not provide for such a mechanism to
15 transfer exclusive Commonwealth power back to the States. The Australian
16 Constitution clearly outlines the division of powers between the Commonwealth and
17 the States, and any changes or transfers of powers would require formal amendments
18 to the Constitution through specific processes outlined in Section 128.
19 The Australian Constitution establishes a federal system of government where certain
20 powers are allocated exclusively to the Commonwealth Parliament under Section 51,
21 including taxation. Land taxation falls under this category of powers exclusively
22 vested in the Commonwealth. While there are provisions for concurrent powers and
23 areas where both levels of government can legislate, matters related to land taxation
24 are generally within the domain of the Commonwealth.
25 Any assertion that States could unilaterally reclaim legislative authority over land
26 taxation without a constitutional amendment would be legally unfounded and
27 contrary to the established framework of federalism in Australia. Therefore, unless
28 there is a formal amendment to the Constitution or a change in legislation at the
29 federal level, States do not have the authority to independently control land taxation.
30 In summary, based on the existing constitutional framework and principles of
31 federalism in Australia, it is not feasible for States to regain legislative powers over
32 land taxation without proper constitutional amendments or legal mechanisms.
33 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:
34 1. Australian Constitution
35 2. Legal Principles of Federalism in Australia
36 3. Division of Powers between Commonwealth and States
37 These sources were consulted to provide accurate information on the distribution of
38 legislative powers in Australia’s federal system and how changes or transfers of such
39 powers would need to adhere to constitutional provisions.
40 Web Search Results
41 5 results
42
43 Barry Collier (politician)
44 https//en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › Barry_Collier_(politician)
45 Barry Collier (politician)
46 He was a Labor Party member of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly from 1999
47 to 2011 and from 2013 to 2015, representing the electorate of Miranda.
48
49 Department of the Legislative Assembly - Parliament of NSW

27-5-2024 Page 13 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 14

1 https//www.parliament.nsw.gov.au › la › department › Documents › department-of-the-

2 legislative-assembly-annual-report-for-2009-2010 ›
3 LA%20Annual%20Report%20200910.pdf
4 Department of the Legislative Assembly - Parliament of NSW
5 parliamentary recess between december 2010 and the march 2011 election should provide
6 staffing resources to complete some of these projects.
7
8 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
9 https//api.parliament.nsw.gov.au › api › hansard › search › daily › pdf › HANSARD-1820781676-64586
10 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
11 Road Transport (Vehicle Registration) Amendment (Heavy Vehicle Registration Charges)
12 Bill 2009. State Revenue Legislation Amendment (Defence Force ...
13
14 Committee Secretary 5-6-2011 Joint ...
15 https//www.aph.gov.au › parliamentary_business › committees › house_of_representatives_committees
16 Committee Secretary 5-6-2011 Joint ...
17 This did not have the effect of preventing the. States from imposing land tax, but rather
18 returned taxation powers back to them. Accordingly ...
19
20 House of Representatives Official Hansard
21 https//citeseerx.ist.psu.edu › document
22 House of Representatives Official Hansard
23 House of Representatives Officeholders. Speaker—The Hon. David Peter Maxwell
24 Hawker MP. Deputy Speaker—The Hon. Ian Raymond Causley MP.
25 END QUOTE Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the Treasurer NSW
26 on 2 March 2011
27
28 Meaning that there is no “state land taxation” legislative powers and neither so can there be any
29 “delegated” land taxation powers” called “council rates”.
30
31 While my wife and I have been ongoing subjected to LAWFARE such as by councils which
32 inflicted considerable harm upon my wife and she now relies using a wheelchair due to the
33 trespassing that a man was banging on the backdoor that my wife was scared the living daylight
34 out of her and her heart rate went for 72 to 122, where she didn’t know the stranger. I however
35 located them in the backyard and it was admitted they had climbed over the fence and working
36 for Banyule City Council. The even vandalized my wife’s motor vehicle that was lawfully
37 parked in front of our property!
38
39 As the Framers of the constitution made clear “that the Ministers of the Crown and their
40 officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any
41 private person would be” that means they personally can be held legally accountable and not
42 for taxpayers to pay the bill as “private person” doesn’t have his/her boils paid by the taxpayers!
43
44 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
45
46 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
47 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

48 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

49 (Our name is our motto!)

27-5-2024 Page 14 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati