Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TABLES
TABLES
Embankment
from Road 72.47 Cum 2,847.82 206,381.52
Way
A.2 BACKFILLING /FILLING COMPANGTING
Gravel Fill (G1) 5.44 Cum 41,627.58 226,454.04
Sub-total 1,647,58.88
B CONCRETE WORKS
B.1 CONCRETE FOOTING & SLAB ON FILL
Portland 313.56 Bags 200.00 62,712.00
Cement
Screened sand 17.42 Cum 900.00 15,678.00
¾ Gravel 34.84 Cum 900.00 31,356.00
B.2 CONCRETE COLUMNS
Portland 195.57 bags 200.00 39,114.00
Cement
Screened sand 10.86 Cum. 900.00 9,744.00
Total 12,822,936.00
(Material Cost Labor Cost and its Overload Cont )
Contractor Profit 1,282,293.66
SUMMARY
Probable 12,822,936.56
Construction Cost
Total ₱14,105,230.00
Construction Cost
OVERPASS NAAWAN
GRAVITY LOAD
D
MA TRI BEAM ROOF/ WALL D L 1.4 1.7
RK B. SLAB 0 1
AR Y A L KI UNI KI Y A L KI UN KI
EA PS PS PS I PS
FRAME A
1 260 0.1 18 14 2.1 0.0 0.9 0.0 10 14 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.7 4.4 1.2
0 50 0 0 9 50 0 08 2 0 7 6 40 2 2 3
2 200 0.1 18 20 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 10 20 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.5 0.9
50 0 3 50 0 08 2 1 9 40 0 5 0
3 200 0.1 18 20 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 10 20 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.5 0.9
50 0 3 50 0 08 2 1 9 40 0 5 0
4 260 0.1 18 14 2.1 0.0 0.9 0.0 10 14 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.7 4.4 1.2
0 50 0 0 9 50 0 08 2 0 7 6 40 2 2 3
5 260 0.1 18 80 1.2 0.0 0.8 0.0 10 80 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.6 2.9 1.0
0 50 0 5 50 0 08 2 4 9 40 4 2 9
FRAME 1
1 20 0.1 10 20 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 20 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0
50 8 9 5 7 08 2 1 7 40 6 7 90
2 200 0.1 10 20 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 20 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0
50 8 9 5 7 08 2 1 7 40 6 7 90
DO 150 0.1 10 16 1.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 10 16 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.4 2.9 0.7
F2 0 50 8 0 0 5 2 08 2 0 8 0 40 2 3 1
DO 150 0.1 10 16 1.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 10 16 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.4 2.9 0.7
F7 0 50 8 0 0 5 2 08 2 0 8 0 40 2 3 1
FRAME 2
1 100 0.1 10 20 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 20 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1
50 8 1 50 3 08 2 1 6 40 3 0 5
2 211 0.1 10 57 9.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 10 57 0.2 16. 0.0 5.9 23. 10.
40 50 8 6 0 50 4 08 2 6 7 72 40 3 40 12
3 100 0.1 10 20 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 20 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1
50 8 3 50 3 08 2 1 6 40 3 0 5
DO 350 0.1 10 40 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 10 40 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.1
F2 50 8 8 5 2 08 2 2 2 40 0 2 7
DO 350 0.1 10 40 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 10 40 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.1
F9 50 8 8 5 2 08 2 2 2 40 0 2 7
TABLE SCHEME 3
DESIGN EXCELLE VERYGO GOO AVERA POO WEIGHT DISCRIPTI
NT OD D GE R ED MEAN ON
CRITERIA 5 4 3 2 1
AESTHETIC 21 32 14 24 9 3.32 GOOD
AND
APPERANCE
ORGANIZATI 36 41 13 8 2 4.01 VERY
ON OF GOOD
STRUCTURE
S
COMMENT 25 33 38 3 0 3.82 GOOD
TO THE
PUBLIC
SAFETY AND 25 31 36 0 4 3.81 GOOD
SECURITY
TOTAL 3.74 GOOD
DESIGN EXCELLENT VERYGOOD GOOD AVERAGE POO WEIGHTED DISCRIPTION
R MEAN
CRITERIA 5 4 3 2 1
AESTHATIC 72 24 4 0 0 4.68 VERY GOOD
AND
APPERANCE
ORGANIZATION 53 42 5 0 0 4.68 VERY GOOD
OF
STRUCTURES
COMMENT TO 81 12 7 0 0 4.74 VERY GOOD
THE PUBLIC
SAFETY AND 76 18 2 4 0 4.66 VERY GOOD
SECURITY
TOTAL 4.64 VERY GOOD
TABLE 5 SCHEME 2
SCHEME 1
DESIGN EXCELLE VERYGO GOO AVERA POO WEIGHT DISCRIPTI
NT OD D GE R ED ON
MEAN
CRITERIA 5 4 3 2 1
AESTHATIC 65 24 4 0 0 4.26 VERY
AND GOOD
APPERANCE
ORGANIZATI 36 48 6 6 4 4.06 GOOD
ON OF
STRUCTURE
S
COMMENT 54 12 16 8 10 3.92 VERY
TO THE GOOD
PUBLIC
SAFETY AND 64 15 11 10 0 4.33 VERY
SECURITY GOOD
TOTAL 4.14 VERY
GOOD