Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KrishnakumarThulasimani HACCPPlanforAppleJam
KrishnakumarThulasimani HACCPPlanforAppleJam
net/publication/330533644
CITATIONS READS
0 46,681
1 author:
T. Krishnakumar
ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Trivandrum, Kerala
103 PUBLICATIONS 430 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by T. Krishnakumar on 22 January 2019.
Submitted by
Krishnakumar Thulasimani
1
LIST OF CONTENTS
1. Abstract 1
2. Introduction 1
8. Conclusion 11
9. References 11
2
Abstract
Apple jam is a gelled product made by boiling crushed apples with sugar and water.
Production of such a ready-to-eat food which is usually not refrigerated requires that all food safety
risks are eliminated. The use of the HACCP system has thus been applied as food safety tool. These
both ensure production of safe products and compliance with basic regulations on food hygiene.
The major sources of contamination, and the possible pathogens and their toxins such as patulin
form moulds, Listeria monocytogenes and E. coli must be analysed and effective preventive
measures implemented.
Introduction
Several definitions for jam are available depending on who is doing the definition (i.e.
background of the person). From a legal standpoint, the EU directive on preserves (EC, 2001)
defines jam as '... a mixture, brought to a suitable gelled consistency, of sugars, the pulp and/or
purée of one or more kinds of fruit, and water... the quantity of pulp and/or purée used for the
manufacture of 1000g of finished product must not be less than 350g as a general rule.
In general however it is accepted that jam is produced by taking mashed or chopped fruit
pulp and boiling it with sugar and water. It is also a widely accepted notion that jams are from the
pulp and juice of one fruit, rather than a combination of several fruits. The traditional understanding
of jam was that of a self-preserved cooked mixture of fruit and sugar. The degree of preservation
related to the final water activity of the product but there are other factors affecting spoilage. These
include soluble solid content, pH and titratable acidity, as well as other unknown intrinsic indices
related to the fruit used (Broomfield, 2001). Commonly when the mixture reaches 105oC, the acid
and pectin in the fruit react with the sugar forming the gel which sets on cooling.
Apple jam will thus be made of chopped apple fruit and apple purée and sugar. The use of
apple is advantageous because apple is on of the few non-citrus fruits known to have a high level of
natural pectin, thus the production can proceed without addition of commercial pectin. Its acid
levels are however low, but can be supplemented by natural screened lime juice. The use of the term
'organic' in food circles is gaining more grounds in this age as people become conscious of what
they eat. Organic has generally been used to refer to an ecological system that at its core relies on
health rich soil to produce strong plants that resist pests and disease; it generally prohibits the use of
pesticides, genetically modifies organisms (GMO), synthetic preservatives and
antibiotics/hormones. In the production of food products such as jam, there is ''... the restriction of
the use of food preservatives, of non-organic ingredients with mainly technological and sensory
3
functions and of micronutrients and processing aids, so that they are used to a minimum extent (EC,
2007). Also, processed foods are only allowed to be labelled organic if all or almost all the
ingredient of agricultural origin is organic. The hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP)
system has over the years become one of choice as reliable way to ensure safety at all levels in the
food chain. Thus its implementation in the production of a ready-to-eat product such as apple jam
will be most appropriate.
Since its initial use by the Pillsbury Company in the 1950's as part of the food safety efforts
in the NASA/ US military space program, HACCP has gradually proven to be the food safety tool
of choice in most food establishments. It has been recognised and approved for use in the food
industry by national and international bodies such as the NACMF of the US, WHO/FAO (Codex),
ICMSF, as well as several governments as the basis for legal framework on food safety. The EU
regulation 178/2002 (EC, 2002) requires entities in the food chain to have a safety system in place
based on HACCP. The ISO standard ISO 22000 on food safety is also largely built on the principles
of HACCP.
HACCP is an analytical tool that enables a food entity to implement and maintain a system
for ensuring food safety. It generally involves assessment of all steps in the particular
manufacturing process, while identifying those steps that have a major effect on the safety of the
food (Burrow, 2001). The identification of the eventual critical control points (CCP) along with
monitoring and control parameters is then the results of the analysis and culminates in the creation
of the safety system.
The HACCP system is based on a universally recognised set of seven principles that are used to
design a safety plan for the food. These principles:
1. Conduct hazard analysis
2. Determine CCP
3. Establish critical limits
4. Establish monitoring procedures
5. Establish corrective action procedures
6. Establish verification procedures
7. Establish record-keeping and documentation procedures
(Ali, 2004)
4
However the Codex Alimentarious Commission has created a logic sequence for the
implementation or application of HACCP. This sequence essentially adds 5 preceding steps to the
seven principles in the implementation phase. These steps are:
1. Assemble a HACCP team
2. Describe the food product that the HACCP plan will address
3. Identify the intended use of food product
4. Construct a flow diagram of the process that is used to produced the product
5. Conduct on-site verification of the process flow diagram
(Codex, 1997).
HACCP for Apple Jam Plant
In the light of the above, the paragraphs below will try to follow the codex logical sequence
to elaborate on a HACCP system for an apple jam production plant.
HACCP Team
A team of company personnel with a good knowledge of food safety management is
assembled. In some cases there may be the need to include a consulting expert in the initial process
but this person may not be a permanent member of the team. The team will typically include the
Quality Manager (team leader), Production Manager/Supervisor, a senior member of production
staff and the Maintenance Manager. The team is responsible for the planning, implementation and
general documentation of the HACCP system. Documentation of general management
responsibility and support for system should be clear and evident in the general quality manual of
the company as the quality policy. Management support is crucial for the success of such a program.
5
Figure 1: Flow Diagram of Apple Jam Production
Lime
Juice Mixing in vessel Sucrose source
Addition Screening
Boiling in Chamber
Holding in Vessel
(allow setting)
Washing and
Sanitizing of Jars
Filling into Jars
Labelling &Holding
Dispatch
6
An on-site verification of the diagram is made by the HACCP team.
Prerequisite Program
It is generally accepted no HACCP plan can be effectively rolled out without a well established
HACCP prerequisite program in place. Prerequisite programs or good manufacturing practices
(GMP's) are programs that ensure general hygiene and sanitation in the plant. Prerequisite programs
may come under broad categories such as:
Chemical control
Equipment maintenance and sanitation
General sanitation and cleaning
Pest control
Personnel training on hygiene and related issues
Transportation: receiving, storage and shipping of material and products
Others.
Detailed manuals for the execution of all these functions should be available and strictly followed.
8
Table 2: HACCP Plan Summary for Apple Jam Production
Step (CCP) Hazard Critical Control Measure Monitoring System Corrective Responsibility Record
Limits Method Frequency Action (Authority)
(Parameters)
Receipt of Foreign bodies Presence of Assessment of Visual Each batch Appropriate Purchasing PUX 1
fresh apple and and mould mould lot (accept or inspection intake of action with Manager
sorting from rotting infestation in reject batch) Presence of ingredients supplier (reject
fruits. apple lot. Supplier signed lot)
Pesticides assessment. certificate from
residue Certificate of supplier
conformance
from suppliers
Water Source Presence of pH level of 6 Sensory and on- Tasting and Daily Inform water Quality QAW1
screening excess ions to 8 and site kit test (for smelling. suppliers. assurance
(chlorine) and chloride level chlorine) Instant test kit Regulate officer
off flavours. of 250mg/lit Scheduled results chlorine
High bacteria Microbiological control system
count analysis of water (in-house)
samples
9
Boiling of Jam Survival of Temperature Measurement Temperature Each batch Rework- reheat Production PDX 1
Mixture bacterial of 105oC for and observation measurement over extended Supervisor
spores, moulds 15 minutes of temperature period
and toxins throughout
boiling
Holding of Jam Cross Functioning Monitoring of Temperature Continuous per Rework Production PDH 2
contamination air pressure air pressure measurement. batch Supervisor.
by bacteria and system in control system Checking of (temperature) Hold affected QAH 2
mould in air holding room. in holding room filter in air Daily (filters) batch till Quality
Temperature Zoning of system confirmation assurance
of 54oC holding room as by laboratory officer
high rick zone analysis.
(using colour
such as red)
Measuring of
holding
temperature and
cooling rate.
Container Cross Negative Random ATP Visual Twice per Quarantine Production PDC 3
cleaning and contamination random ATP swab of inspection and batch. suspected Supervisor
10
Filling from the swab of containers and ATP kit swabs. product, QAC 3
(packaging) containers. containers. covers. On-site rinse pending Quality
Improper Low cleaning Periodic /batch water laboratory assurance
sealing. agent of cleaning concentration analysis officer
Cleaning agent concentration agent measurement. results.
residue in rinse water. concentration in Sealing
Pass random rinse water. efficiency test
sealing test Sealing
efficiency test.
11
Elaboration on Microbiological Hazards and Prevention
Generally the important bacteria worthy of note in fruit products is Listeria monocytogenes
which is a common contaminant in the food processing plant, though the faecal coliform
Escherichia coli may also be important. Control of microbial hazards should thus include ensuring
that water supply is free from contamination and that hygiene and sanitation programs for premises
and staff are strictly implemented, as these may be routes for contamination (Beatie and Wade,
2001).
For the raw apple, the major food safety problem is that of mycotoxins produces by
contaminating mould such as Penicillium expansum. This fungus produces the blue mould rot with
the inherent toxin patulin. Patulin is also known to be produced similar moulds that grow on apple
jam in storage, especially when exposed in the home after initial opening (Lindroth et al, 1978,
Lindroth and Niskanen, 1978). The important spoilage organism for apple jam is the yeast
Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, but Toruluspora delbrueckii may also be found. These fungus cause
spoilage by fermenting the jam, with production of gas. The conditions thus created may invite
other pathogens such as lactic acid bacteria and others to invade the jam, causing further disease on
consumption.
Raw Materials
Especially with regards to organically produced apples for the jam, which are not treated
with fungicides, contamination by mould and the subsequent production of patulin is the major food
safety index. Care should be taken in the initial receipt step to ensure that the apple lot is in good
condition, free of rotting/rotten fruits as much possible. Any fruit observed not to be of sound
quality should be removed. Sorting should continue during the washing process. Re-use of water for
later washing should be avoided unless substantial treatment regimes have been applied. With good
storage conditions, the sugar should not be a source of worry with respect to pathogenic infection,
provided certification of conformance to GMP is received form supplier. Care should be taken to
avoid wetting and storage contamination. This could be due to the presence of such pests as ant,
cockroaches and rodents (rat and their droppings).
The water source is very important in the manufacturing environment as it is used in the pre-
processing steps, the cleaning and sanitation of the plant, as well as being a composite part of the
final product. Samples of the water should be taken periodically for laboratory analysis to ensure
bacteria counts are as low as possible. Positive result trends should be investigated and required
12
action taken. It will be advisable to pass water to be incorporated into the jam pass through a filter.
This filter must be checked frequently for efficiency and soundness. As a general rule (of thumb),
water used in the processing plant should be of drinking water quality.
Equipment used in the manufacture of jam and other preserves have been known to harbour
certain spoilage yeast unless thoroughly freed of sugar residues and then disinfected. The common
spoilage yeast of jam, Z. rouxii, may be enriched and carried from one production run to the next if
these ‘sugar-rich localities’ in the plant are not eliminated (Seiler, 1977). Apart from being the
growth substrate for yeast, these areas may also attract pests such as insects and rodents with the
pathogens they carry around.
Faecal contamination and the introduction of soil may bring bacteria such as E. coli,
Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes. The elimination of these bacteria is paramount in any food
production establishment. Important sources of such contamination include pests on the plant,
personnel clothing and footwear as well as improper general hygiene. The inclusion of an integrated
pest management program in the pre-requisite program is thus stressed here. The highest level of
plant and personal hygiene should be practised by personnel, who should be adequately educated on
the need for this and measures and the consequences of default. An important tool that may be used
to reduce the spread of contamination is zoning of the processing area. The creation of colour coded
higher levels/zones will thus be used in this plant. Personnel must also as a rule be made to wear
appropriate clothing including hair covering. Foot baths and other such facilities for hand washing
and other hygiene practices must be provided and sited at vantage points where their use is crucial
to prevent contamination.
The temperature at which filling of the jam is done is important for both quality and safety
reasons. Filling at an elevated temperature ensures jam will set properly in the jar. However an
elevated temperature is also essential to create an environment that excludes air borne bacteria.
Sanitation of the glass jars and covers is to ensure removal of all possible contaminants as the jar
can be important in cross contamination of the product, especially from bacterial spores and some
moulds. Temperature of the washing water and the time of contact should be adequate to have
desired lethal effect on targeted microbes. If a washing trough is used, the water should be
13
frequently changed to avoid concentration of removed contaminants.
After packaging and labelling, handling and storage at less than 5oC through shipping and
sale display (in supermarkets) should keep jam safe within stipulate shelf life. In the home however,
contamination may occur if precautions are not taken. Growth of moulds and the subsequent
production of patulin in the jam is likely if the jam is not covered properly after initial opening.
Contamination by faecal bacteria such as E.coli and Salmonella are possible if there is negligence in
handling.
Rapid test methods are available as ready-to-use kits, for instance ATP-bioluminscence.
These tests examine organic remains on a surface which poses an indirect risk for microbial growth.
ATP-bioluminscence detects ATP from microorganism and organic residues. (Vogel, 2007). These
tests expose results very quickly (within seconds or minutes) making it possible to carry out
corrective actions in response to poor test results, e.g. before production starts. They are sensitive,
safe, easy to use - no specialized knowledge or laboratory facilities are required - and a helpful tool
in monitoring the general hygiene. However, they are not a replacement for microbiological testing,
as they give no evidence of bacterial contamination. (Vogel, 2007)
14
patulin ranges from 25-46mg/kg body weight for oral ingestion to 5-15mg/kg body weight for
intraperitoneal administration. The World Health Organisation has suggested a tolerable weekly
intake of about 7ug/kg body weight (WHO, 1991).
Listeria is ubiquitous in nature, occurring in soil, vegetation and water (Coyle et al, 1984). It
can survive long periods in both soil and plant material. L. monocytogenes can grow in the pH
ranges of 4.3- 9.4 and up to 10% sodium chloride (ICMSF, 1996). It may survive pasteurization at
63oC for 30 minutes. However exposure at above 72oC for 15 seconds has been known to destroy it.
Hence in the apple jam, post cooking (105oC for about 20 minutes) and post filling (54oC)
contamination will offer more serious Listeria threat. Listerosis is a very serious and often fatal
infection affecting mostly the elderly and immunocompromised. Gastrointestinal illness is one
effect. Listerosis has been known to cause abortions, fatigue, encephalitis, abscesses and meningitis.
In humans, as few as 1000 ingested cells of the bacteria produce diarrhoea, mild fever and malaise
(FDA/CFSAN, 2003). Other faecal coliforms such as Salmonella and E. coli can also cause serious
conditions such as enteric fever which even may be life threatening. As few as 15 cells of
Salmonella for instance can cause illness (FDA/CFSAN, 2003).
Conclusion
The production of organic apple jam, especially on a commercial scale requires careful
planning to ensure that all the food safety issues of concern are adequately addressed. The use of a
well thought through HACCP plan can be a good way to ensure this desired level of food safety.
Apart from fulfilling basic legal requirement on food safety, this can also be used to ensure
customer confidence in the final product on the shelf.
15
References
1. Ali, I. 2004. Food Quality Assurance: Principles and Practices. CRC Press, UK.
2. Beatie, B. and Wade, N. 2001. Storage, Ripening and Handling of Fruits. In: Fruit
Processing: Nutrition, Products and Quality Management, 2ed. Eds. D. Arthely and P.R.
Ashurst. Aspen Publishers, Maryland, USA.
3. Broomfield, R.W. 2001. The Manufacture of Preserves, Flavourings and Dried Fruits. In:
Fruit Processing: Nutrition, Products and Quality Management, 2ed. Eds. D. Arthely and
P.R. Ashurst. Aspen Publishers, Maryland, USA.
4. Burrows, G. 2001. Quality Management System and Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point.
In: Fruit Processing: Nutrition, Products and Quality Management, 2ed. Eds. D. Arthely and
P.R. Ashurst. Aspen Publishers, Maryland, USA.
5. Codex, 1997. Recommended International Code of Practice, General Principles of Food
Hygiene. Codex Alimentarious Commission, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.
Rome.
6. Deshpande, S. 2002. Handbook of Food Toxicology. Marcel Dekker Incorporated, UK.
7. EC, 2004. Regulation (EC) No. 852/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council.
Official Journal of the European Union, Brussels.
8. EC, 2001. Council Directive 2001/113/EC. Official Journal of the European Communities,
Brussels.
9. EC, 2007. Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007. Official Journal of the European Union,
Brussels.
10. FDA/CFSAN, 2003. Food borne Pathogenic Microorganisms and Natural Toxins Handbook:
The 'Bad Bug Book'. Centre for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition / Food and Drug
Administration, Madison. Available online [4.01.2008] www.cfsan.fda.gov
11. ICMSF, 2006. 'Microorganisms in Food 5, Characteristics of Microbial Pathogens'.
International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Food. Blackie Academic
and Professional, London, UK.
12. Lindroth, S. And Niskanen, O. 1978. Comparison of Potential Patulin Hazard in Home-
made and Commercial Apple Products. Journal of Science.
13. Seiler, E. 1977. Jam and Confectioneries. Baking Industries Journal. January Issue, Page 4.
14. Vogel, B.F. 2007. Methods for Control of Cleaning and Disinfection. Slides from Lectures in
Hygiene and Sanitation (11.10.2007), course no. 270054. The Faculty of Life Sciences,
16
University of Copenhagen.
15. WHO, 1991. Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. 37th Report of the
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO Technical Report Series 806,
Geneva.
17