Professional Documents
Culture Documents
288-ملف البحث (Word) -1127-1-10-20200217
288-ملف البحث (Word) -1127-1-10-20200217
11 -2019
2010-2018
2018 2010
SPSS21
Journal of Hama University vol.2 NO.11 -2019
Abstract
This study aims to identify the impact of financial risks in the degree of banking safety in
private commercial banks in Syria, the case study of Bank Audi Syria for the period from
2010 to 2018. The importance of this study is to highlight the importance of measuring
financial risks and their impact on the degree of banking safety which considered one of the
main objectives of commercial banks
The independent variable represents the financial risk (liquidity risk and credit risk)while the
dependent variable represents bank safety and is measured by the ratio of equity to risk
assets and to study the relation between them, the descriptive approach was adopted. The
simple regression method was used based on the statistical analysis program SPSS21
The results of the study showed a strong positive correlation between liquidity risk and bank
safety, as well as a strong but adverse correlation between credit risk and bank safety, and
a statistically significant effect for liquidity risk and credit risk in the degree of banking safety
Keywords: Financial Risks, Banking Safety, Liquidity Risk, Credit Risk, Bank Audi Syria
Journal of Hama University vol.2 NO.11 -2019
.1
.2
-1
-2
.3
-1
-2
.4
Journal of Hama University vol.2 NO.11 -2019
.5
-1
-2
.6
SPSS
.7
.8
2018 2010
.9
2008
Journal of Hama University vol.2 NO.11 -2019
1997-2007 12 5
Panel Data
2005-2016
39.5% 60.5%
2018
Journal of Hama University vol.2 NO.11 -2019
2009-2016 6
Herfindal Hirschman
2018 2010
.10
10
11
12
8 Ostrom, Lee T., author(2012). Risk assessment : tools, techniques, and their applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc,p6
9 Schroeck, Gerhard (2002). Risk management and value creation in financial institutions . John Wiley & Sons, Inc,p24
10
165 2012
11
Adalsteinsson, Gudni,(2014). The liquidity management guide : from policy to pitfalls. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, United
Kingdom,p25
12
65 2007
Journal of Hama University vol.2 NO.11 -2019
13
14
.1
.2
.3
3
15
16
17
18
13
2017
82 20
14
156-152 2012
15
156 2012
16
Van Gestel, T, Baesens,B. (2009). Credit Risk Management Basic Concepts: financial risk components rating analysis,
models, economic and regulatory capital. Oxford University Press Inc., New York,p24
17
Banks, Erik. (2003). Practical risk management : an executive guide to avoiding surprises and losses . John Wiley &
Sons Ltd, England,p19
2012 18
119 2010
Journal of Hama University vol.2 NO.11 -2019
19
20
.1
.2
.3
3
21
22
23
2007 19
51
20
285 2012
21
2015
69
22
Banks, Erik. (2003). Practical risk management : an executive guide to avoiding surprises and losses .reference
above,p154
23
Zidan, Khaled Impact of credit risk policies on profitability of commercial banking sector in Palestine,. PH.D, Czech
University of Life Sciences Prague,2014,p17
Journal of Hama University vol.2 NO.11 -2019
24
25
26
27
.11
.1.11
14456 2005 30
12
2,500,000,000
57,245,000 5,724,500,000 2011
100
47% .. 19
28
99.99 % ...
24
59 2013
2004
25
61 2 18
26
39
61
27
28
BASY,(2018),Annual report
Journal of Hama University vol.2 NO.11 -2019
.2.11
Microsoft Excel
2010-2018
: 1
2010-2018 1
1
47.77% 2011 2012
116.81% 2016
2017-
2018
2018-2010
SPSS 21
Model Summary
Model R R Adjusted R Std. Error of
Square Square the Estimate
1 .963a .928 .918 .1673038
a. Predictors: (Constant), L
a
Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Standardized t Sig.
Coefficients Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) -.837- .172 -4.871- .002
1
L 1.895 .199 .963 9.505 .000
a. Dependent Variable: BS
Spss21
2
R=0.963
92.8%
3
a
ANOVA
Model Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Regression 2.529 1 2.529 90.339 .000b
1 Residual .196 7 .028
Total 2.725 8
Journal of Hama University vol.2 NO.11 -2019
a. Dependent Variable: BS
b. Predictors: (Constant), L
Spss21
sig=0 3
0.05
4
Model Summary
Model R R Adjusted R Std. Error of
Square Square the Estimate
1 .956a .913 .901 .1834944
a. Predictors: (Constant), CR
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Standardized t Sig.
Coefficients Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 1.666 .127 13.108 .000
1
CR -3.641- .424 -.956- -8.598- .000
a. Dependent Variable: BS
Spss21
4
R=-0.956
91.3%
Journal of Hama University vol.2 NO.11 -2019
5 h
ANOVAa
Model Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Regression 2.489 1 2.489 73.919 .000b
1 Residual .236 7 .034
Total 2.725 8
a. Dependent Variable: BS
b. Predictors: (Constant), CR
Spss21
sig=0 5
0.05
.12
2010-2018 -1
-2
-3
18.95% 10%
-4
10%
36.41%
-1
-2
-3
Journal of Hama University vol.2 NO.11 -2019
-4
.13
2012 .1
2012 .2
2013 .3
2007 .4
2017 .5
73-100 20
2007 .6
.7
59-77 2004 2 18
2012 .8
2010
2008 .9
2018 .10
4 40
115-138
2015 .11
Journal of Hama University vol.2 NO.11 -2019