Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Irex Mos
Irex Mos
Irex Mos
1 INSTRUMENT RATING
1. Reserved
2.2 Documents
2.2.1 List the documents that must be carried on an IFR flight. CAR 139 states that
documents that must be carried in Australian aircraft are – Certificate of Airworthiness,
Certificate of Registration, Maintenance Release and Licences/Medicals of Operating Crew
(unless CASA approves otherwise), if carrying passengers a manifest/list of names including
embarkation/disembarkation, and if carrying cargo the bills of lading and manifests with
respect to the cargo.
3. Meteorology
3.1 Weather phenomena
3.1.1 Seasonal variations in the location and frequency of the following phenomena and
their impact on IFR operations:
(a) frontal weather; fronts all year round, cold fronts in particular bring bad weather and
storms, impacts on IFR operations generally for SID/STAR, delays including holding,
alternates, missed approaches
(b) tropical cyclones; generally restricted to warmer months in northern Australia bring
high winds and heavy rain, vicinity of cyclone tends to be no flights conducted.
Weather extending from TC’s can cause impacts on IFR operations generally for
SID/STAR, delays including holding, alternates, missed approaches
(c) dust devils; normally in very hot areas, close to ground, threat reduces with height.
Takeoff and landings should be avoided around them, can be fatal if encountered at a
bad time. Generally can be seen.
(d) thunderstorms; generally more frequent and worse in the summer and the further
north too. Completely avoid. Impacts on IFR operations generally for SID/STAR,
delays including holding, alternates, missed approaches
(e) jetstreams; near the altitude of Tropopause, strong winds flowing in a westerly
direction around the globe, these are rivers of wind essentially following the
boundaries between hot and cold air, known to move north and south and influence
weather around them. Generally associated around troughs and ridges, keep aware
of accompanying weather.
(f) fog. Slant visibility is a major issue with fog appearing fine above but then on
approach to land pilots have very low vis. Visibility affected alone, follow procedures
for STAR/SID, missed approaches common with dense fog.
3.3 Sources of altimeter QNH required to conduct operations under the IFR On the DAP
approach plate has the shaded box and an approved source actual QNH obtained, 100ft
can be taken off MDA. Other then that, local, area, cruising QNH’s are used as normal.
5.2 GNSS
5.2.1 The GNSS system and its principles of operation, including the following:
(a) GNSS system components; Space Segment, Control Segment, User Segment
(b) space segment; multiple satellites operating in six orbital planes around the globe
with orbits completed 11hrs 58mins. Satellites have up to 4 atomic clocks keeping
accurate time up to a thousandth of a millionth of a second.
(c) GNSS satellite signal; system set up to get line of sight with satellites at least 15
degrees above horizon using at least 4 satellites to get the position.
(d) pseudo random code (C/A course acquisition code); used to calculate exact times
and distances for satellites using GPS.
(e) control segment; each satellite system needs to be managed and monitored for
errors and failures through a master control station na network of monitoring stations.
This segment is responsible for uploading almanac data also making corrections to
individual satellites as required
(f) user segment (the GNSS receiver); is any device receiving the satellite signal and
using it to derive location and time operation, and for aircraft need to be certified to
particular TSO standards
(g) pseudo ranging; distance between a satellite and navigation satellite receiver
(h) principle of position fixing/minimum satellites required for navigation functions;
minimum of 4 for 3D Navigations, 5 for 3D plus RAIM, 6 for 3D + FD & Exclusion
(i) TSO/Performance limitations of various equipment types; TSO C129, 145, 146,
196 receivers, 129 some don’t have have FD only
(j) RAIM; out of the 5 satellites the RAIM does combinations of 4 each combination and
solutions are compared and ifthey are too different the unit issues a warning
(k) masking function; signals can be masked due to terrain and foliage
(l) receiver displays of system integrity; see RAIM
(m) operating modes – navigation with and without RAIM, DR; can be used is GPS is
not the main means of NAV
(n) explain why GNSS use the WGS84 coordinate system; because this system tracks
the centre of the earth, much like our lat/long coordinates do.
(o) effect of PDOP/GDOP. High GDOP is where the satellites used are quite close
together limiting the accuracy of the location of receiver, Low GDOP means the
satellites are spread further apart giving a much more precise location of the receiver.
5.2.2 The following terms in relation to a navigational system and recall to what extent the
GNSS system meets the associated requirements:
(a) accuracy; dependent on the RNP specification for route or part of route
(b) integrity; RAIM
(c) means of providing GNSS integrity; RAIM/FD
(d) RAIM, procedural, systems integration; RAIM
(e) availability; reports on outages, requiring the need for alternate RNAV
(f) continuity of service. Ability to perform without interruption
5.2.3 Degradation of GNSS accuracy by the following GNSS errors:
(a) ephemeris; 3m, data transmitted every 30 sec but data may be up to 2 hrs old,
transmissions may not be coming from the position the satellite says it is
(b) clock; 3m, can experience clock drift errors in satellite which throw out timing
calculations of receiver, corrections transmitted in nav data message but may not be
exactly accurate.
(c) receiver; 1.5m susceptible to noise and interference, own quartz crystal clock carries
uncertainties which combine to reduce accuracy of solution
(d) atmospheric/ionospheric; signals slowed down by ionsphere (10m) and water
vapour in troposphere (3m), degree of error changes with time of day, season and
solar activity at the time
(e) multipath; 3m, radio waves may bounce off terrainand obstacles and follow a different
path to main signal, bounced signals picked up by receiver and cause errors in the
navigation solution
(f) selective availability (SA); 55m, applied an eror to ephmeris and clock data to
prevent enemy forces from using system against the US, was turned off in 2000.
(g) typical total error associated with c/a code; total error of 12m
(h) interference. Depends on what and how bad it is
5.2.4 Requirements for use of GNSS in the following IFR operations:
(a) en route; TSO C129 is minimum GPS for IFR
(b) RNP instrument approach operations; if any doubt of GNSS or failure type warning
comes up missed approach commenced and an alternative approach procedure or
divert to alternate
(c) alternates; if any doubt of GNSS or failure type warning comes up missed approach
commenced and an alternative approach procedure or divert to alternate
(d) RNP operations. If any failures come up, alternate means of IFR need to be done
5.2.5 Pilots actions and implications for the following GNSS warnings and messages,
including the following:
(a) loss of RAIM; alternate means of navigation
(b) 2D navigation; fine for a 2D approach
(c) in dead reckoning mode; GNSS not to be used as means of navigation
(d) database out-of-date; GNSS not to be used as means of navigation
(e) database missing/failure; GNSS not to be used as means of navigation
(f) GNSS fail; GNSS not to be used as means of navigation
(g) barometric input fail; Baro aiding not to be done, add 50ft to DA
(h) power/battery fail; GNSS not to be used as means of navigation
(i) parallel offset on. Only with approval can continue, or GNSS not to be used as
means of navigation
5.2.6 Parameters applicable to tracking tolerances, automatic waypoint sequencing, CDI
sensitivity and RAIM availability in each of the following segments:
(a) en route; RNP
(b) terminal; RNP
(c) initial approach; RNP
(d) intermediate approach; RNP
(e) final approach; RNP
(f) missed approach. RNP
5.2.7 Indications requiring a missed approach to be initiated. As per approach plate,
minimums not met, or loss of GPS if being used on that type of approach
5.2.8 The effect of availability or otherwise of baro-aiding on RAIM availability and
prediction. The difference between having to add or minus 50ft to minimums as per
approach plate and planned
5.2.9 Describe the effect of satellite unserviceability on the reliability of each type of
prediction. Depending on the planned down time and location, sometimes it could be
different
8. Human factors
8.1.1 Physiological factors effecting human performance when conducting flight without visual
reference, including the following:
(a) the part played by the vestibular systems, namely the semicircular canals and otiliths,
in helping the pilot maintain orientation;
(b) the circumstances aggravate vestibular disorientation, and how to overcome this
problem.
8.1.2 The circumstances that may aggravate vestibular disorientation such as somatogravic
illusions and somatogyral illusions.
8.1.3 State conditions and causes under which visual illusions, such as 'false horizons', visual-cue
illusions, relative motion illusions, 'flicker' effect, ‘black hole' illusion, and autokinesis may
occur.
8.1.4 GNSS operating procedures which provide safeguards against navigational errors and loss
of situational awareness because of the following:
(a) mode errors;
(b) data entry errors;
(c) data validation and checking, including independent cross-checking procedures;
(d) automation induced complacency;
(e) non-standardisation of the GNSS receiver units;
(f) human information processing and situational awareness.
8.1.5 When conducting an instrument approach operation describe the benefits of utilising a CDFA
technique from a human performance limitations perspective.