MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Highly Proficient Teachers

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Rating Period: AUGUST 2023 – JANUARY 2024 Date of Review: JANUARY 24, 2024
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (School Head) Review
KRA Target Results
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
1. Modeled effective applications of Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
content knowledge within and across inter-observer agreement form/s done through
curriculum teaching areas. (PPST 1.1.3) onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom
observation and proof of attendance of colleagues

2. Evaluated with colleagues the 1. Proof/s of attendance in coaching and mentoring

effectiveness of teaching strategies sessions/meetings/LAC sessions / FGDs / other
that promote learner achievement in collegial discussions that highlights the objective
literacy and numeracy. (PPST 1.4.3) 2. Minutes/Notes of coaching and mentoring
sessions/meetings / FGDs / other collegial
discussions that highlights the objective
1. Content 3. Reflection notes of teachers on the coaching and
Basic mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC sessions
Knowledge
Education 28% FGDs/other collegial discussions that highlights the
Services and
objective with proof/s of attendance
Pedagogy 4. Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form
(PMCF), with annotations highlighting the objective

3. Developed and applied effective
teaching strategies to promote
critical and creative thinking, as well
as other higher-order thinking skills.
(PPST 1.5.3)
Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
inter-observer agreement form/s done through
onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom
observation and proof of attendance of colleagues
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (School Head) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
4. Modeled and supported colleagues in 28% Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
the proficient use of Mother Tongue, inter-observer agreement form/s done through
Filipino and English to improve teaching onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom
and learning, as well as to develop the observation and proof of attendance of colleagues
learners’ pride of their language,
heritage and culture. (PPST 1.6.3)

2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective strategies that Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
Environment ensure safe and secure learning inter-observer agreement form/s done through
and Diversity environments to enhance learning onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom
of Learners through the consistent implementation observation and proof of attendance of colleagues
of policies, guidelines and procedures.
(PPST 2.1.3)

Basic
Education 6. Exhibit effective practices to foster Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
Services learning environments that promote inter-observer agreement form/s done through
fairness, respect and care to encourage onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom
learning. (PPST 2.2.3) observation and proof of attendance of colleagues

7. Exhibited a learner-centered culture Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or

that promotes success by using effective inter-observer agreement form/s done through
teaching strategies that respond to their onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom
3: Curriculum linguistic, cultural, socio-economic and observation and proof of attendance of colleagues
and Planning religious backgrounds. (PPST 3.2.3)
& Assessment
and Reporting
(PPST Domain 8. Developed and applied teaching Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
3 and 4) strategies to address effectively the inter-observer agreement form/s done through
needs of learners from indigenous onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom
groups. observation and proof of attendance of colleagues
(PPST 3.5.3)
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (School Head) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
9. Modeled to colleagues the setting of At least one (1) lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP,
achievable and challenging learning WLP, WLL, Lesson Exemplars, and the likes) or one
outcomes that are aligned with learning lesson from a self-learning module, developed by
competencies to cultivate a culture of the rate? and used in instruction, with achievable
excellence for all learners. (PPST 4.2.3) and appropriate learning outcomes that are aligned
with the learning competencies as shown in any one
3: Curriculum
(1) of the following:
and Planning • lecture/discussion
& Assessment • activity/activity sheet
and Reporting • performance task
(PPST Domain • rubric for assessing performance using criteria that
3 and 4) appropriately describe the target output
and demonstrated in a LAC session as attested by
the LAC Coordinator/ Approving Authority with
proof of attendance of colleagues

10. Used effective strategies for Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
providing timely, accurate and inter-observer agreement form/s done through
Basic constructive feedback to encourage onsite / face-to-face / in-person classroom
Education learners to reflect on and improve their observation and proof of attendance of colleagues
Services own learning.
(PPST 5.3.3)
1. Approved LAC/FGD Plan
2. Any proof of communication with colleagues (e.g.,
text/chat)
3. Any proof of collaborative review (e.g.,
4: Assessment accomplishment report) of
and Reporting • learner assessment data
(PPST Domain • intervention materials developed for remediation/
11. Worked collaboratively with
4) • enhancement/ enhancement/ enrichment
colleagues to analyze and utilize
activities
assessment data to modify practices
4. Minutes of coaching and mentoring sessions,
and programs to further support learner
meetings, LACIFGD session, or other collegial
progress and achievement. (PPST 5.5.3)
discussions, with proof of attendance
5. Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form
(PMCF), with annotations highlighting interpretation
of monitoring and evaluation strategies of
attainment data
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (School Head) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
1. Proof/s of attendance in coaching and mentoring
sessions/meetings/LAC sessions / FGDs / other
collegial discussions that highlights the objective
2. Minutes/Notes of coaching and mentoring
sessions/meetings / FGDs / other collegial
discussions that highlights the objective
12. Guided colleagues to strengthen 3. Reflection notes of teachers on the coaching and
4: Assessment
relationships with parents/ guardians mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC sessions
and Reporting
and the wider school community to FGDs/other collegial discussions that highlights the
(PPST Domain
maximize their involvement in the objective with proof/s of attendance
4)
educative process. (PPST 6.2.3) 4. Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form
(PMCF), with annotations highlighting the objective

Basic
Education 13. Contributed actively to professional 1. Approved activity/project proposal for a webinar,
Services networks within and between schools to retooling, upskilling, and other training/ seminar/
improve knowledge and to enhance workshop with accomplishment report
practice. 2. Approved activity/project proposal for
(PPST 7.3.3) benchmarking or innovation with accomplishment
report
4: Personal 3. Certificate as contributor to LRMDS
Growth and 4. Certificate of completion in a course/training
Professional 5. Certificate of recognition/ speakership in a
Development webinar, retooling, upskilling, and other training/
(PPST Domain seminar/ workshop
5) 6. Any proof of participation in school LAC sessions
(online/face-to-face) certified by the LAC
Coordinator
7. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (School Head) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
1. Proof/s of attendance in coaching and mentoring
sessions/meetings/LAC sessions I FGDs / other
activities that highlights the objective
2. Approved LAC/FGD Plan
3. Training matrix of LAC sessions highlighting the
4: Personal teacher's role
Growth and 4. Minutes of LAC sessions/FGDs highlighting the
Professional 14. Initiated professional reflections teacher's role, with proof of attendance
Basic Development and promote learning opportunities 5. Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form
Education (PPST Domain with colleagues to improve (PMCF)
Services 5) practice. 6. Personal notes/reflections of colleagues on
regional/ division/ school-led INSETs and/or other
trainings supervised/ conducted by teacher
7. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (School Head) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Any one (1) proof that the master teacher:
• served as facilitator/ speaker
• served as demonstration teacher
• served as a member of the technical working
group
• served as OIC in the absence of the principal
• represented the principal in meetings and
conference
• observed classes of Teachers
• assisted the school selection committee in the
evaluation of credentials when hiring or promoting
teachers
Basic 15. Performed various related works / • served in a committee
Education Plus Factor activities that contribute to the teaching- • served as adviser to co-curricular activities
Services learning process • served as coordinator / chairperson
• authored / contributed to a book or journal
• coached and mentored learners in competitions
• mentored pre-service / in-service teachers
• conducted research within the rating period;
• others (please specify) with annotation on how it
contributed to the teaching-learning process.

Ratee: Rater: Approving Authority: