Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learning Journal 4
Learning Journal 4
Meutia Noviyani
Deirdre Silberstein
2/15/2023
Table of Contents
1.1. Summary
plans are:
You can't just use one tool and work around it. First, focus on the goal and strategy, and
then choose the best tool for the job. Leaders sometimes require a combination of multiple
visions rather than a single technology to implement a specific strategy (Tabrizi et al., 2019).
2. Leverage insiders
Don't just hire a consultant to tell the company to transform into something that doesn't fit
the company. Solutions can be found inside the company, from the people who have the most
If one of the goals is to improve customer experience, then the effort is fixed it will rely
on the customer input. Holding focus groups, testing, and reviewing feedback will help in
When the employees know that a transformation is imminent, they fear for the safety of
their jobs, this leads to resistance. Instead, emphasize that transformation is an opportunity for
employees to upgrade their expertise for the future (Tabrizi et al., 2019).
1.2. Reflection
I talked about this in my previous learning journal, but this reading also reflects the
change management theory. I feel that the transformation process magnifies how the operations
model is flawed, as Tabrizi et al. (2019) mention in the article. Whenever there are changes in
the company, the operations go on with a few changes but mostly do with the same basic manual
model. I agree with the 5 key lessons that are presented by the author. It's a good way for starting
the journey of digital transformation, although not all of them are applicable in a national
1.3. Question
My company consists of hundreds of branches with its problem. How can the company
attempt to learn from their employee’s broad expertise efficiently to apply the second lesson?
2.1. Summary
A transformation doesn’t have to mean the adoption of new technology, instead, it's a
business model that can link a new technology to an emerging market need (Kavadias et al.,
2016). It explains the results of their research in six keys to successfully making a transformative
business model:
the business ecosystem, such as sensor development, big data, artificial intelligence, machine
(Kavadias et al., 2016). However, business growth is always market dependent, which is
complicated by greater diversity in customer preferences, higher factor prices, and increased
Combining the six trends, technological development, and challenges of the market the
right way will transform the business into the future (Kavadias et al., 2016). A company can tick
one or all boxes. It's not guaranteed success, but it would ensure your business model links
2.2. Reflection
After reviewing these six keys to digitally transforming your business, I understand the
struggle of incumbents trying to reinvent their entire business model, brand, and mindset at the
same time to compete with entrants. This emphasizes the importance of knowing yourself before
changing because changing your business model and organization to be more agile will be
nothing more than jargon if your employees don't understand what it means to be agile.
products into a closed-loop process is not cheap. A company must understand what it means to
"tick all the boxes" and how it can do so. Finding the fit and doing a good job at it will make a
company more successful in transforming rather than trying to check as many boxes as possible.
2.3. Question
Is it possible that an incumbent is unable to transform because none of the processes in the
3.1. Summary
Despite widespread adoption, the theory's fundamental principles have been widely
misunderstood and frequently misapplied. Researchers, authors, and consultants frequently use
the term "disruptive innovation" to describe any situation in which an industry is shaken up and
Christensen et al. (2015) mentioned that disrupters usually grab the market incumbents
overlook, the low-end market and the untapped market. Uber, having it mentioned by
Christensen et al. (2015) as an example, doesn't fit into the two categories that make a company
disrupter because:
1. Disruption is a process
2. Disrupters build a different business model from incumbents
3. Some disruptive innovations succeed, and some don't
4. The word "Disrupt or be disrupted" can be misguided
Christensen et al. (2015) explain that disruption can show that management decisions
should not be based on the disruption idea. Instead, it aids them in making a strategic decision
between following a disruptive or sustaining course. The characteristics of disruption are they
improve over time, compelled by the pursuit of profitability and new market share, without
emulating the incumbent's high costs (Christensen et al., 2015). The study said disruption theory
does not explain everything about innovation specifically or business success generally.
3.2. Reflection
I believe it is critical to understand what constitutes a disruption and what does not. Some
businesses can succeed without being disruptors, and combining strategies that are incompatible
with one another will cause more harm than good. Furthermore, I agree with the fourth point
regarding the mantra "disrupt or be disrupted." This so-called mantra will cause panic within the
organization, potentially leading to a failed transformation that is not only costly but also
3.3. Question
Is there any example of an incumbent who succeeds in innovation and disrupts their
4.1. Summary
According to the article, there are three efforts to define business transformation. The
first is operational. Many businesses that are "going digital" fall into this category, as they use
new technologies to solve old problems (Anthony, 2016). In a rapidly changing world,
improving an old game is simply not enough (Anthony, 2016). The next is an operational mode
or core transformation, which involves doing what you are currently doing in a fundamentally
different way. The last one is strategic it involves changing the very essence of the company
(Anthony, 2016).
These efforts also need to be measured in different ways. Operational model
transformation should change the metrics the company uses to track performance, using the same
Leaders should also combine two types of transformation: one that strengthens today's
business by reinventing the core operating model, and one that creates tomorrow's core business
(Anthony, 2016). To own their future rather than be disrupted by it, leaders must face the
4.2. Reflection
The first effort in which a company goes digital to solve old problems occurs in my
company as well. They are attempting to solve old problems by digitizing the process while
failing to change the mindset. They were developing more web applications and dashboards to
address the jumbled business processes that had become more rigid as a result of digitization.
Furthermore, the digital process does not streamline anything, but it adds more work on top of
the manual version, with papers and word document reports, which has contributed to skepticism
among many older employees when it comes to shifting toward digital transformation. My
working on it.
4.3. Question
How do you measure success in digital transformation besides surviving? Is there any
financial metric available to track the successes of a company undergoing digital transformation?
5.1. Summary
Anthony and Schwartz (2017) find that companies that show substantial progress toward
transformation use three metrics: new growth, core repositioning, and financial performance.
Among the 10 companies that fit the metrics (Amazon, Netflix, Priceline, Apple, Aetna, Adobe,
DaVita, Microsoft, Danone, and ThyssenKrupp), they share similar characteristics as well as the
strategy they employed (Anthony & Schwartz, 2017). The characteristics mentioned in the
articles are:
converting analog to digital processes. Rather, it is a multiphase strategy for repositioning today's
business while discovering new growth opportunities (Anthony & Schwartz, 2017).
5.2. Reflection
After considering the similarities in the characteristics of those companies, I believe they
deserve to be on the list. However, some factors are not visible to the public that drive the
company to where it is now. Other companies, both incumbents and newcomers, should look up
to those ten companies. The CEO's resilience, innovative thinking, and bravery in taking risks
are admirable. Finally, the research emphasizes the importance of strong leadership, a clear
vision for the future, a commitment to cultural change, and a focus on anticipating and adapting
to disruption.
5.3. Question
Can the value of the company determine the success of a company's effort to transform digitally?
6.1. Summary
Bossidy and Charan (2002) believe that execution is the missing link between goals and
outcomes. Many people have excellent ideas and plans, but they fail to put them into action.
They emphasize that execution is about taking the right action in the right way, not just taking
action. Moreover, all leaders must practice the discipline of execution at all levels (Bossidy &
Charan, 2002). In its most fundamental sense, execution is a systematic way of exposing reality
The heart of execution lies in the three core processes: people, strategy, and operations
process (Bossidy & Charan, 2002). Most importantly, the business leader must run the three core
processes with intensity and rigor, driven by execution as the part of organization's culture
(Bossidy & Charan, 2002). This involves setting clear goals, defining specific actions to achieve
Organizations don't execute unless the right people, individually and collectively, focus
on the right details at the right time (Bossidy & Charan, 2002).
6.2. Reflection
transform digitally, but when the leader was asked what it was that we needed to transform
digitally, or even something as simple as what is digital, they had no answer. Like the CEO at the
beginning of the chapter, the transformation plan was meticulously crafted. However, execution
fails to reach all levels and is abandoned at the level of line managers, who would rather get busy
work done than execute a management plan. This is why only certain levels of the company feel
transformative, while the rest are stuck in the same loop with extra work to follow management's
orders.
6.3. Question
In a big corporation (like my company) CEO can't be hands-on in the business operation, who
7.1. Summary
Bossidy and Charan (2002) retold stories about three major corporations in this chapter:
Xerox, Lucent, and EDS. They primarily discussed the three companies' execution failures and
successes. Xerox and Lucent failed to execute their large-scale strategies and financial
objectives, whereas EDS succeeded through disciplined execution. The main difference between
those companies is knowing their capabilities before setting and executing goals.
The steps to execute the strategy were mentioned by the authors. The first thing is to
involve all the responsible people for the plan's outcome when shaping the plan. The second is to
ask those people about the hows of execution: how were they going to achieve their target on a
timely basis, their inventory, and cost and quality goals (Bossidy & Charan, 2002). Third, setting
milestones for the progress of the plan. Fourth and last, setting up a contingency plan or risk
management plan.
The discipline of execution is based on a set of building blocks that every leader must use
to design, install, and operate effectively the three core processes rigorously and consistently
The most important thing Dick Brown did, aside from executing the entire thing with
unrivaled discipline, was how he got into people's heads by sending weekly emails to the entire
organization. A CEO who does this will boost employee morale by letting them know who he is
and how he plans to help the company succeed. This is what many transformations lack: the
people in charge of everything are incapable of carrying it out with discipline. Not every CEO is
capable of reaching out to the entire organization; most CEOs, as mentioned by the authors, are
indeed high-level thinkers. Even so, not every employee will deem emails from a CEO as
personalized; to be honest, I've received one as well, but it was one of those once-a-year emails.
Another thing I took away from the reading was the importance of hiring the right person for the
job. Not only that, but it's difficult; it takes bravery to deny an underperforming executive the job
7.3. Question
If many CEO are high-level thinkers, is it better for the company to make an exclusive execution
8.1. Summary
This chapter talked about the seven essential behavior that forms the first building block
The authors outline seven essential behaviors that leaders must exhibit to drive execution
success:
1. Know your business - To set clear goals and execute strategies effectively, leaders
must have a thorough understanding of the business, including SWOT analysis, and
2. Insist on realism - Leaders must be honest and realistic in setting goals and assessing
3. Set clear goals and priorities - Leaders must establish specific, measurable, and
achievable goals for their teams and ensure that they are understood.
4. Follow through - Leaders must keep promises and hold themselves and their teams
5. Reward the doers - Leaders must recognize and reward those who can execute
6. Expand people's capabilities through coaching - Leaders must develop their people
7. Know yourself - Leaders must be aware of their strengths and weaknesses and work
8.2. Reflection
Execution is the responsibility of the entire organization to successfully achieve the goal.
I identify more with the emotional fortitude section because it is applicable not only as a leader
at work but also in everyday life. Having this four-fold emotional fortitude as your personality as
a leader will lead you and your team to greater success. As a person, this will lead to a greater
sense of purpose in life. People will generally believe you if you are genuine. Knowing your
limit and how far you can push it will help you in the long run. Self-mastery will assist you in
developing accountability and confidence. Humility teaches you to admit your mistakes rather
than be arrogant. Overall, a leader must be more than just intelligent; they must also recognize
that turning an idea into reality necessitates the most difficult step, known as an execution.
8.3. Question
Leaders can't always reward people or divisions that keep delivering results; when or how is it
References
Anthony, S. D. (2016, February 29). What Do You Really Mean by Business “Transformation”?
https://hbr.org/2016/02/what-do-you-really-mean-by-business-transformation
Anthony, S. D., & Schwartz, E. I. (2017, May 8). What the Best Transformational Leaders Do.
https://hbr.org/2017/05/what-the-best-transformational-leaders-do
Bossidy, L., & Charan, R. (2002). Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done. Crown.
Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2015, December). What is Disruptive
https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation
Kavadias, S., Ladas, K., & Loch, C. (2016, October). The Transformative Business Model.
https://hbr.org/2016/10/the-transformative-business-model
Tabrizi, B., Lam, E., Girard, K., & Irvin, V. (2019, March 13). Digital Transformation Is Not
About Technology. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved February 15, 2023, from
https://hbr.org/2019/03/digital-transformation-is-not-about-technology?
autocomplete=true