Classics in Drama

Submitted By
Rabia Younas (211670158)
Areeha Mushtaq (211670165)
Filza Faheem (211670180)
Rukhsar Nasir (211670156)
Khadija tul Kubra (211670099)
Kashaf Zaidi (211670222)
ENG-221(C)

Submitted To
Malik Hassan Raza
September 4th, 2023
Department of English
1 Classics in Drama

Title:
Hamartia and Heroic Nobility in Oedipus Rex
By Robert Hul
The author argues that the play Oedipus Rex is more about his moral adherence to

truth and conscience than it is about Oedipus's vices. According to the author, those

who choose the hard truth and act on what they believe often ignore impacts in

terms of their moral relevance. Oedipus' pain is not less painful, but it serves as

evidence of the integrity and freedom of his bold decision. To fully understand

Oedipus' moral standing and the importance of unjustified suffering, the author

additionally discusses Aristotle's concept of hamartia.

Aristotle states that tragedy is a dramatic portrayal of a serious and complete

action that produces sorrow and anxiety through catharsis. As tragedy depends

greatly on reversals and discoveries, the plot, or the order of events, is the most

essential component. To provoke the particular emotional excitation and catharsis of

tragedy, the plot must be coherent and contain credible circumstances that unfold

unexpectedly

The text analyzes the theory of hamartia, a character's fallibility, and its use in

a great storyline. Aristotle says that hamartia is not a moral fault that necessitates

punishment even though it is often considered as such. Though natural and

expected, the emotional reaction to unjust suffering is not sad. According to

Aristotle, compassion rises according to an individual's ethical standing, but this is

2 Classics in Drama

only true to some extent. Moral fury and disgust replace empathy as a person's

character reaches the pinnacle of virtue, indicating that the suffering must be the

result of some hamartia, blunder, or mistake. Because he is not an example of virtue,

Oedipus suffers unnecessarily. Oedipus is cited by Aristotle as an example of a

person who is appropriately depicted in this book.

Oedipus, the protagonist of ‘Oedipus Rex’ by Sophocles is portrayed as an

exemplary and virtuous person. This theory contends that Oedipus' steadfast

commitment to discovering the truth and acting according to ethics rather than

virtues or character faults, defines what the pay is truly about. The author argues

that the play "Oedipus Rex" is primarily about Oedipus's ethical adherence to reality

and humanity is sound. Throughout the text, the writer powerfully supports this

viewpoint by examining the actions and choices of Oedipus. The explanation of

hamartia, an idea given by Aristotle, makes the argument strong by emphasizing the

difference between tragic suffering and moral failure. And tragic suffering.

Overall, this argument gives an insightful view of the play's main theme.

Oedipus has a constant desire to discover the truth regarding Thebe's sickness

throughout the play. He is determined to rescue his citizens and put a stop to the

plague. His interactions with Creon, Tiresias, and other characters show his

dedication. The work's text illustrates Oedipus's moral commitment through both his

words and deeds, such as his persistent questioning of Tiresias despite the
3 Classics in Drama

messenger's refusal to respond. The Author's viewpoint is valid since it aligns with

the textual proof and the portrayal of characters in "Oedipus Rex." It emphasizes the

play's moral element and presents hamartia as an awful flaw rather than necessarily

an ethical failure by emphasizing Oedipus's unwavering commitment to the truth

and his sense of duty to his people. This argument is powerful and offers an

insightful viewpoint on the play's primary idea because Oedipus' suffering in the

play is an outcome of his upright character.

Aristotle described tragedy as having a particular objective in mind, whereas

Plato criticized tragic poetry for stretching the soul and developing harmful

emotions. In contrast to Plato, Aristotle sees tragedy as a serious and philosophical

perspective. He focuses on how the characters' and the tragedy's acts have the

appropriate impact. As emotions serve a natural, aggressive part in ethical conduct,

Aristotle sees a means and an ultimate objective in tragedy. He readily

acknowledges that tragedy can also be a source of illuminating pleasure for

significant emotions.

The comparative examination of Aristotle and Plato's views on tragedy in

"Oedipus Rex" enhances the text by providing the discussion of the play with a

wider philosophical framework. Aristotle thought that tragedy ought to provoke

deep feelings and teach us important lessons. By understanding his point of view,

we can see how the play utilizes Oedipus's journey to evoke emotions in the
4 Classics in Drama

audience and get them to consider moral dilemmas. On the opposing side, Plato

expressed concern that tragedies would hurt the spectator's spirits. We can

understand the potential moral and emotional complexities involved in the tragic

components of the play simply by taking into account his point of view. Overall,

this comparison enhances our understanding of "Oedipus Rex" by showing that it

may serve as both a medium for essential moral and philosophical ideas as well as a

powerful emotional experience. It enriches our understanding by showing the play's

intricacy and the various ways in which it could relate to its audience.

In Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, an upright man has taken an unexpected turn

for his downfall. His main qualities include moral awareness and knowledge, which

lead him to find out the dangerous crossroads, the Jocasta’s bed, as well as

knowledge about himself. Sophocles would have highlighted these characteristics if

he presented a person whose misery was brought on by the character's faults. It's

tempting to see Oedipus’s treatment of Tiresias and Creon as a violation of morality,

yet the play is not about how morally intelligible the world is. Tiresias' Treatment

by Oedipus is acceptable because he regards himself as the sympathetic ruler who

loves the people of Theban. Oedipus feels that Tiresias refusing to help him is a

personal attack on his reputation and endangers his investigation. Oedipus is

suspicious of Creon because he likes power without accountability. Therefore, his

suggestion to send for the prophet increases his suspicion.

5 Classics in Drama

Robert Hull by Sophocles does not depict an ethically intelligible world.

From the very start, it is obvious that Oedipus has a strong moral character and has

experienced hardships. Sophocles' purpose can be seen in the simple fact that events

that bring Oedipus to his knees are not dramatized but rather retained. Although

Oedipus' claim of self-defense is correct, he lacks compassion in such terrible

circumstances’ Reversal is unavoidable and because of his elevated conscience, he

chases himself down and makes his suffering worse. This action of Oedipus is not

comparable to those of a person who has no chance to do what’s right.

The tale challenges accepted beliefs about morality and usefulness by

criticizing Oedipus' ignorance of the truth, Tiresias’ knowledge of the facts, and

Creon’s innocence of rebellion. While Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex shows a tragic

struggle between unwavering nobility and a world of futile evil, Plato’s morality is

based on goodness

The text's odd celebration of Oedipus' aretaic indicates that his unwavering lo

yalty to truth and morality will run short of a silent and arbitrary world. Ithaca is

used as a metaphor for isolation and homelessness in Homer’s epic poem, Odysseus,

a clever hero with, courage, creativity, and beauty. Oedipus from Sophocles, on the

other hand, is a representation of homelessness and isolation, symbolizing the loss

of innocence, a desire for extreme freedom, and unfair suffering.

6 Classics in Drama

The contrast of Oedipus to other literary figures such as Odysseus gives

significant context for recognizing Oedipus's positions and tragedy. This

juxtaposition of Oedipus with the other literary figures, like Odysseus: This study

helps us in better understanding of "Oedipus Rex'' by giving alternative viewpoints

It enables us to understand Oedipus's significant role in literature and tragedy by

comparing Oedipus with the other characters such as Odysseus. Although not a

common argument, this juxtaposition serves as a useful contextual tool. For

instance, comparing Oedipus with Odysseus, a smart hero on the way home, shows

the thematic differences between the two characters. In contrast, Oedipus represents

homelessness, loneliness, and the loss of vitality. This comparison emphasizes

Oedipus's distinct traits and the play's emphasis on his terrible suffering and tragic

fate.

This contrast increased our understanding of Oedipus's personality and the

themes of this play. It encourages us to think about how various literary characters

represent various aspects of the human experience, which enriches our

understanding of "Oedipus Rex" within the context of literary work and tragedy.

According to Nietzsche, an essential purpose of art is to affirm, bless, and

glorify existence. The connection of Dionysus' tragic death and miraculous rebirth

with tragedy, however, calls into question the limits of individual liberty that
7 Classics in Drama

tragedy articulates. The challenging tension that gives rise to nobility is undermined

by Nietzsche’s fatal interpretation of Dionysian symbolism, which in Oedipus's

illustration enables him to identify himself. His endorsement is selective, as shown

by the characters’ actions such as Oedipus' refusal of Jocasta’s suggestion to live

carelessly.

The addition of Nietzsche's theory on art and existence, especially about the

Dionysian symbolism, provides a new depth to the story. In the story, Nietzsche’s

views show that Oedipus's constant search for truth can be seen as a celebration of

life. This point of view argues that despite the difficult situation, Oedipus's

determination to discover the truth shows a perfect example of how to overcome the

difficulties of life. While this perspective gives depth to the themes of play and

character of Oedipus, it should be seen that it depends on rather speculative links to

Nietzsche's theory, which may require additional research to completely show its

resemblance to "Oedipus Rex." However, it provides a thought-challenging

philosophical depth to Oedipus's journey and courage in the face of hardships.

In conclusion, Robert Hull's examination and interpretation of "Oedipus Rex"

provides a provocative point of view about the main themes of the play which are

the tragic nature of humans, morality, and the truth. The author, Robert Hull

strongly argues that the core of the play is represented by the steadfast commitment

of Oedipus's commitment to find the truth, even in terrible situations. The text
8 Classics in Drama

increases and enhances our understanding of moral and philosophical problems by

exploring the idea of Aristotle about Hamartia and comparing it with Plato's

viewpoint about tragedy.

Furthermore, the comparison of Oedipus Rex with other characters from

literature, such as Odysseus, strengthens our knowledge about the Character of

Oedipus as well as about the specific tragedy that he encounters. Our understanding

of the play "Oedipus Rex" has been enhanced due to this contextual analysis.

Nietzsche's point of view on art and existence is also included and this

provides an entirely new perspective, especially about Dionysian symbolism.

Overall, Robert Hull's examination of the play "Oedipus Rex" uncovers the

complexity of the work and enables the audience to ponder on the spiritual and

moral issues it highlights. This study provides an insightful and complete evaluation

of Sophocles' masterpiece of Sophocles; however, some areas require more

research. References

.J. A. Moore. Sophochs and Arete. CAMBRIDGE, 1938.

Fables, Robert. Sophocles, three theban plays. New york: Penguin books, 1984.
9 Classics in Drama