Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Ebook of Group Theory 1St Edition Dinesh Khattar Online PDF All Chapter
Full Ebook of Group Theory 1St Edition Dinesh Khattar Online PDF All Chapter
Khattar
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmeta.com/product/group-theory-1st-edition-dinesh-khattar/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://ebookmeta.com/product/group-theory-1st-edition-dinesh-
khattar-2/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/a-first-course-in-group-theory-1st-
edition-bijan-davvaz/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/group-theory-of-chemical-
elements-1st-edition-abram-i-fet/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/group-theory-for-physicists-2nd-
edition-zhong-qi-ma/
On Group Analysis and Beyond Group Analysis as Meta
Theory Clinical Social Practice and Art 1st Edition
Anastassios Koukis
https://ebookmeta.com/product/on-group-analysis-and-beyond-group-
analysis-as-meta-theory-clinical-social-practice-and-art-1st-
edition-anastassios-koukis/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/symmetry-and-group-theory-in-
chemistry-second-edition-s-k-dogra/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/ergodic-theoretic-methods-in-group-
homology-a-minicourse-on-l2-betti-numbers-in-group-theory-clara-
loh/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/creativity-and-innovation-theory-
research-and-practice-2nd-edition-taylor-francis-group/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-theory-and-practice-of-group-
psychotherapy-6th-edition-irvin-d-yalom/
Dinesh Khattar
Neha Agrawal
Group Theory
Group Theory
Dinesh Khattar · Neha Agrawal
Group Theory
Dinesh Khattar Neha Agrawal
Department of Mathematics Department of Mathematics
University of Delhi University of Delhi
New Delhi, India New Delhi, India
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the
whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation,
broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage
and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or
hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does
not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective
laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publishers, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are
believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publishers nor the authors or the editors
give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions
that may have been made. The publishers remain neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps
and institutional affiliations.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Dedicated to our families as without their support it
would not have been possible to write this book.
Preface
This book has been written as a text for undergraduate students of Mathematics. It is
primarily based on the classroom lectures, the authors gave at the University of Delhi
for many years. It is a near-impossible task, however, to cover, over the course of
classroom lectures, the sheer volume of material that a student of group theory is called
upon to master. The speed and capacity of understanding also varies from one student
to another: while a committed student may grasp concepts without much assistance,
another may require the teacher to invest more time and thought, and provide a greater
number of illustrations. This book, therefore, is motivated by the need to supplement
the classroom experience. It shall attempt to canvass a greater breadth of material than
the class lectures, and it shall endeavor to cater to a broad spectrum of students in this
process.
The book covers second and third-year group theory, in an undergraduate
mathematics course, meeting the curriculum requirements of most Universities.
We have tried to present the subject matter in the language and tone of a classroom
lecture. Thus the presentation is somewhat informal; we hope that this will put the
readers at their ease.
Different concepts have been explained with the help of examples. The attempt is
made by the authors to explain everything lucidly, so that it is possible to follow all the
theories without the aid of a teacher.
Each Chapter opens with a short meditation on the rationale that propels our
treatment of the subject being examined in that chapter. This is meant to furnish the
student with insight into the overarching structure of the book, and to encourage an
understanding of group theory as a cohesive body.
The book could be used for self study as well as for a course text, and so full
details of almost all proofs are included along with hundreds of solved problems,
to give ample guidance in understanding abstract notions. The solved problems are
interspersed throughout the text at places where they naturally arise, making the book
ideal for self-study. The proofs are precise and complete, backed up by chapter end
problems, with just the right level of difficulty. There is plenty of scope for the readers
to try and solve problems on their own. Also, the explanatory answers to the selected
problems being given at the end of every chapter.
Important results in every chapter receive proportionate attention and emphasis;
intermediate lemmas are also carefully designed so that they not only serve the theorems
but are also valuable independently.
vii
viii Preface
Each chapter contains ‘Learning Objectives’ which the reader would like to achieve
after having gone through that chapter. This will help the students focus their study.
There are eleven chapters in this book starting with definition and examples of
Groups. It then goes on to cover properties of groups, subgroups, Cyclic groups,
Permutation groups, Cosets and Lagrange’s Theorem, Normal subgroups and Factor
Groups, Group Homomorphisms and Isomorphisms, Automorphisms, Direct Products,
Group Actions and Sylow Theorems. A common thread runs through the entire book,
tying each chapter to the next - the unifying thread being the treatment of the concept
of symmetry of objects that do indeed satisfy the definition of a group.
We, gratefully, acknowledge the inspiration, encouragement and valuable sugges-
tions received from the teachers who are teaching Group Theory in the undergraduate
courses of several Universities. We also thank all our students for their curiosity for
sharing with us the difficulties they experienced in learning these topics.
This work would not have been possible without the support and encouragement
from Mr. Sunil Saxena and Mr. Jai Raj Kapoor at Ane Books.
Our sincere thanks and words of appreciation to all of them, who are directly or
indirectly involved in the project.
We are grateful to our dear friend and colleague Dr. S. P. Tripathi who was
generous, both with his time and his formidable intellect, and, in the course of a few
short, incisive remarks, changed the path of this book entirely.
Last but not the least our young colleague Nishita, Assistant Professor, St. Stephens
College, University of Delhi. We had the numbers, but she had the words, and her
contributions are sprinkled throughout the pages of this work.
Suggestions and comments to improve the book in content and style are always
welcome and will be greatly appreciated and acknowledged.
Thank you for choosing our book.
May you find it stimulating and rewarding.
Reading this marvelous book on Group Theory by Professor Dinesh Khattar and
Dr. Neha Agrawal has brought back many pleasant memories. My first introduction to
abstract mathematics occurred through Group Theory as a freshman undergraduate at
Delhi University. I fell in love with the subject at once andl retain the same affection
for Group Theory till today. I am also aware that one of the main reasons that caused
me to fall in love with Group Theory was the fact that I had access to two outstanding
books viz. Brikhoff and Maclane’s classic ‘A Survey of Modern Algebra’ and
I. N. Herstein’s ‘Topics in Algebra’. Thus, the role played by a good book in mastering
a subject is vital. At the same time,I have had a nagging concern. There just haven’t
been too many scholarly yet interesting books on Group Theory authored by Indian
mathematicians. One of the reasons for this concern is the fact that the plethora of good
books that come into India from abroad are rather expensive and the not so expensive
books by Indian authors generally tend not to be in the same league as the ones that
come from abroad.
I am thus delighted to observe that Khattar and Agrawal’s book on Group Theory
fulfills the needs of India in many ways. More importantly, the book can prove to be
quite useful to students across the globe. One of the most interesting features of the
book is the fact that it blends history and mathematics in a meaningful way to arouse
the interest of the student. The other very noteworthy feature of the book is that it
is replete with examples and exercises of varying degrees of difficulty. This book
illustrates concepts with a very large number of good examples and with just as many
of exercises from the very easy to those that are challenging. The book is written in a
very lucid and easy style that retains the interest of the reader throughout. The proofs
are also very well explained. I am certain the book shall make a mark as a much needed
text on Group Theory for undergradautes of mathematics, physics and chemistry.
There are three concepts that permeate all of mathematics in varying degrees:
linearity, continuity and symmetry. This book is all about symmetry and written in a
style that is as pleasing to the mind as symmetry is to the eyes. I commend the book
wholeheartedly.
ix
Contents
xiii
1
Groups
learninG objeCtives
♦ Concept of Symmetry
♦ Definition and Examples of Groups
♦ Cayley Table
♦ Elementary Properties of Groups
♦ Dihedral Groups
ConCept oF symmetry
“Symmetry is a vast subject, significant in art and nature. Mathematics lies
at its root, and it would be hard to find a better one on which to demonstrate
the working of the mathematical intellect.”
Thus unfolds a famous quote by the German mathematician Hermann Weyl.
Weyl, above, refers to the fertile intersection of symmetry with mathematics, and
that is where our project takes root as well. Nature and the cosmos supply us with
limitless evidence of an inherent symmetry. When we look around ourselves, we
discover that almost everything around us on earth is symmetrically fashioned.
Both our arts and our sciences arise from a wide-eyed wonder at this miraculous
inheritance. Our art seeks to synthesize this natural symmetry, while our science
seeks to analyze it. Anything to do with symmetry in the sciences (physics,
chemistry, biology) relies upon the mathematical tool called Group Theory†.
Chemists, for instance, use symmetric groups to classify molecules and predict
many of their chemical properties. Group theory, in fact, sends its branches into
fields as fresh and exciting as modern cryptography, which widely employs
symmetric groups as well.
† In 1958, Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to 2 young Chinese Physicists Yang and
Lee for discovering the anti-symmetry of particles using Group Theory.
What exactly is symmetry, then? Quite simply, it is this: when we say a certain
shape is symmetric, or has symmetry, it means that we can fold the shape in half
in such a way that both halves align exactly as they sit on top of each other. We
mean that one half of the shape is a perfect match to the other. Mathematically,
symmetry means that one shape becomes exactly like another when you move it
in some way: turn, flip or slide.
To begin with, consider an equilateral triangle. Suppose we remove it from the
plane and move it in some way and then put it back into its original position. We
need to see in how many possible ways this can be done.
To understand this let us mark the corners of the equilateral triangle as a, b and
c. Consider all possible motions and try to relate the starting and the final positions.
(i) Rotation of 0°:
c c
R0
a b a b
(ii) Rotation of 120°:
c b
R120
a b c a
R240
a b b c
(iv) Reflection about the axis passing through the vertex a.
c b
FA
a b a c
Groups 3
FB
a b c b
FC
a b b a
We see that these are the only possible ways in which we can rotate or flip
the triangle while retaining its original shape. Suppose we compose two possible
motions say FB followed by R240. We observe that this gives a single motion FC.
This tells us that composing any two motions gives back a single motion. These
six motions can be viewed as functions from the set A = {a, b, c} to itself.
Let us write these elements in set form as
S = {R0, R120, R240, FA, FB, FC}
Out of these six elements, three elements are rotations and three are reflections.
These elements of S being functions can be composed by function composition
to yield another function.
fg(x) = f(g(x)) for all x ∈ A.
For example: FAFB(a) = c, FAFB(b) = a, FAFB(c) = b. Thus FAFB = R120.
For convenience, let us make a multiplication table as
R0 R120 R240 FA FB FC
R0 R0 R120 R240 FA FB FC
R120 R120 R240 R0 FC FA FB
R240 R240 R0 R120 FB FC FA
FA FA FB FC R0 R120 R240
FB FB FC FA R240 R0 R120
FC FC FA FB R120 R240 R0
4 Group Theory
This table is also called Cayley Table, which will be discussed in detail later
in this chapter.
Studying the table, we observe some interesting things like composing any two
entries of the set we again get an element from the same set without introducing
any new element. This property is known as closure and S is said to be closed
here. Also, we observe that composing any function with R0 either from left or right
yields the same function. This element R0 is called the identity element because
it never changes the behavior of any function it is composed with.
Further looking at every column of the table we see that corresponding to every
element h in S, there is some element k again from S that neutralizes the effect of
h and gives the identity R0. Such an element k is called the inverse of h.
Also, we know function composition is associative in nature. Therefore, the set
S has four properties, namely closure, associativity, identity and inverse.
Any algebraic structure which satisfies the above four axioms, namely closure,
associativity, identity and inverse, is called a group, which will be formally defined
later.
The set S defined above together with the operation of function composition
satisfies all the group properties and hence is a group called a Dihedral group.
The Dihedral groups are a very important class of groups that will be discussed
in detail towards the end of this chapter.
1.1 Groups
In this section we formally define an algebraic structure named as Group. Algebraic
structures are those non-empty sets, together with binary composition, that satisfy
one or more axioms. One of the simplest and most basic of all algebraic structures
is the group. Numerous examples of groups are discussed. These examples will be
used throughout this book. We therefore study these examples in details.
Before we begin with the formal definition of a group, we recall the definition
of a binary composition.
a
However a ∗ b = may not belong to for every a, b ∈ , so division of
b
integers in not a binary composition.
deFinition 1.2: A non-empty set G together with one or more binary operations
is called an algebraic structure.
The algebraic structure consisting of a non-empty set G together with a binary
composition * is denoted by (G, *).
deFinition 1.5: A group G is said to be finite if the set G is finite, else it is infinite.
Remarks:
• The set of rational numbers and the set of real numbers form abelian
groups under ordinary addition.
In each case the identity element is 0 and the inverse of a is −a.
• The set of integers under subtraction does not form a group as associativity
does not hold. For example, 2 – (–3 – 4) ≠ (2 – (–3)) – 4.
Remarks:
• The set of real numbers or rational numbers is not a group under
multiplication, as the element 0 does not have a multiplicative inverse.
• Any set containing 0 is not a group under multiplication.
Example 1.5: The set + of positive rational numbers is a group under ordinary
multiplication. The inverse of any element a is 1/a = a−1.
In fact, (+, ·) is an abelian group.
Example 1.6: The set ∗ of non-zero real numbers is an abelian group under
ordinary multiplication. The identity is 1. The inverse of a is 1/a for all a in *.
Example 1.7: The set of all natural numbers is not a group under the composition
of ordinary addition as there exists no b in such that a + b = a = b + a, for
every a ∈ .
Example 1.8: The set S of positive irrational numbers together with 1, under
multiplication, satisfies the three properties given in the definition of a group, but
is not a group. Indeed, 2 ⋅ 2 = 2 ∉ S, so S is not closed under multiplication.
8 Group Theory
Example 1.9: The set n = {(a1, a2, ... , an): ai ∈ } forms an abelian group
under the operation of component-wise addition.
Here, (0, 0, ..., 0) is the identity element and (–a1, –a2, ... , –an) ∈ n is the
inverse of (a1, a2, ... , an).
Problem 1.1 Prove that the set of all rational numbers of the form 3m · 6n,
where m and n are integers, is a group under multiplication.
Solution Let G = {3m · 6n ∈ : m, n ∈ }
m n m n
Let 3 ⋅ 6 ∈ G and 3 1 ⋅ 6 1 ∈ G, then
(3m ⋅ 6 n )(3m1 ⋅ 6 n1 ) = 3m + m1 ⋅ 6 n+ n1 ∈ G as m + m1 , n + n1 ∈
∴ Closure property holds.
Since the set of rational numbers is associative under multiplication, therefore
associativity holds in G.
Also, 1 = 30 · 60 ∈ G such that
(30 · 60) (3m · 6n) = 3m · 6n = (3m · 6n) (30 · 60)
∴ 1 ∈ G is the identity element.
m n −m −n
Inverse of 3 ⋅ 6 ∈ G is 3 ⋅ 6 ∈ G as −m, −n ∈ such that
(3m · 6n) (3−m · 6−n) = 1 = (3−m · 6−n) (3m · 6n)
Thus, G is a group under multiplication.
† It is named after the 19th century British mathematician Arthur Cayley. A Cayley table
describes the structure of a finite group by arranging all the possible products of all the
group elements in a square table. Many properties of the group—such as whether or not
it is abelian, which elements are inverses of which elements, what is the identity element
and so on, can be discovered from its Cayley table.
Groups 9
* a1 a2 a3 — — aj
a1 a1 * a2 a1 * a2 a1 * a3 — — a1 * aj
a2 a2 * a1 a2 * a2 a2 * a3 — — a2 * aj
a3 a3 * a1 a3 * a2 a3 * a3 — — a3 * aj
— — — — — — —
— — — — — — —
ai ai * a1 ai * a2 ai * a3 — — ai * aj
Example 1.10: The subset G = {1, −1, i, −i}of the set of complex numbers is
a group under usual complex multiplication. In fact, it is a finite abelian group.
(i) Closure: The closure is established through the following composition
table
Table 1.1: The Cayley Table of G
. 1 –1 i –i
1 1 –1 i –i
–1 –1 1 –i i
i i –i –1 1
–i –i i 1 –1
Clearly, from the Cayley table given above, it can be seen that the closure
property holds, since for every a, b in G, the element a · b is also in G.
(ii) Associativity: Since complex numbers are associative with respect to
multiplication, therefore associativity holds.
(iii) Identity: 1 ∈ G is the identity element as ∀ a ∈ G, a · 1 = a = 1 · a.
(iv) Inverse: Since 1.1 = 1, –1. –1 = 1, i. –i = 1 and –i. i = 1, the inverse of
1, –1, i, –i are 1, –1, –i, i respectively.
Therefore, G forms a finite group under complex multiplication.
Also, since for every a, b ∈ G, we have a · b = b · a, therefore (G, .) is an abelian
group.
Remark: The numbers 1, –1, i, –i, where i2 = –1 are the four fourth roots of
unity. Thus, the four fourth roots of unity form a finite abelian group of order
4 with respect to multiplication.
10 Group Theory
Example 1.11: We now consider an important non-abelian group called the group
of Quaternions†. It is a finite group consisting of 8 elements 1, –1, i, –i, j, –j, k, – k.
Let G = Q8 = {1, –1, i, –i, j, –j, k, –k}
Define composition on G by using multiplication as
i 2 = j 2 = k 2 = −1, ij = − ji = k , jk = − kj = i, ki = −ik = j.
(i) Closure: The closure is established through the following composition
table
Table 1.2: The Cayley Table of G
· 1 –1 i –i j –j k –k
1 1 –1 i –i j –j k –k
–1 –1 1 –i i –j j –k k
i i –i –1 1 k –k –j j
–i –i i 1 –1 –k k j –j
j j –j –k k –1 1 i –i
–j –j j k –k 1 –1 –i i
k k –k j –j –i i –1 1
–k –k k –j j i –i 1 –1
Clearly from the Cayley table given above, closure property holds.
(ii) Associativity: Clearly, ∀a, b, c ∈ G, we have (ab)c = a(bc), therefore,
associativity holds.
(iii) Identity: 1 ∈ G is the identity element as a · 1 = a = 1 · a ∀ a ∈ G
(iv) Inverse: Since, 1.1 = 1, –1. –1 = 1, i. –i = 1, –i. i = 1
j. –j = 1, –j. j = 1, k. – k = 1, –k. k = 1,
therefore inverse of 1 is 1, –1 is –1, i is –i, –i is i, j is –j, –j is j, k is –k and
–k is k.
Hence, (G, .) is a group.
It is not an abelian group as ij = –ji, so ij ≠ ji.
As already mentioned, this group is called the Quaternion Group.
Thus, Q8 is an example of a finite non- abelian group.
† In mathematics, the quaternions are a number system that extends the complex numbers.
They were first described by Irish mathematician William Hamilton in 1843. They have
practical uses in applied mathematics—in particular for calculations involving three-
dimensional rotations such as in computer graphics and texture analysis.
Groups 11
Problem 1.2 Prove that the set G = {1, w, w2}, where w is an imaginary cube
root of unity, is a finite abelian group under multiplication.
Solution Note that w3 = 1.
The composition table is given below:
Table 1.3: Group Table of G
· 1 w w2
1 1 w w2
2
w w w 1
2 2
w w 1 w
1. Since all the entries in the composition table are elements of the set G,
therefore G is closed w.r.t. multiplication.
2. Since the elements of G are all complex numbers and multiplication of
complex numbers is associative, therefore associativity holds.
3. Clearly from the Cayley table, we have
1 · 1 = 1, 1 · w = w = w · 1, 1 · w2 = w2 = w2 · 1
Therefore, 1 ∈ G is the identity element.
4. Also, from the table, the inverses of 1, w, w2 are 1, w2, w respectively.
Therefore, G forms a finite group under multiplication.
Since multiplication of complex numbers is commutative, therefore G is a finite
abelian group under multiplication.
Problem 1.3 If the table given below is a group table, fill in the blank entries.
Table 1.4: Group Table
e a b c d
e e – – – –
a – b – – e
b – c d e –
c – d – a b
d – – – – –
e a b c d
e e a b c d
a a b c d e
b b c d e a
c c d e a b
d d e a b c
Problem 1.4 Show that the set G = {x + y 5 : x, y ∈} forms a group under
addition.
Solution Let a = x1 + y1 5 , b = x2 + y2 5 and c = x3 + y3 5 be any three
elements of G, where xi, yi ∈ for i = 1, 2, 3.
(i) Closure: We have
a + b = ( x1 + y1 5) + ( x2 + y2 5) = ( x1 + x2 ) + ( y1 + y2 ) 5 ∈G
as x1 + x2 ∈ and y1 + y2 ∈
(ii) Associativity: We have
(a + b) + c = (( x1 + y1 5) + ( x2 + y2 5)) + ( x3 + y3 5)
= (( x1 + x2 ) + ( y1 + y2 ) 5) + ( x3 + y3 5)
Groups 13
= (( x1 + x2 ) + x3 ) + (( y1 + y2 ) + y3 ) 5
= ( x1 + ( x2 + x3 )) + ( y1 + ( y2 + y3 )) 5
by associativity in
= ( x1 + y1 5) + (( x2 + x3 ) + ( y2 + y3 ) 5)
= ( x1 + y1 5) + (( x2 + y2 5) + ( x3 + y3 5))
= a + (b + c)
Therefore, associativity holds.
( x + y 5) + (0 + 0 5) = ( x + y 5) = (0 + 0 5) + ( x + y 5)
∀x + y 5 ∈ G
( x + y 5) + (− x − y 5) = (0 + 0 5) = (− x − y 5) + ( x + y 5)
a1 b1 a2 b2 a1 + a2 b1 + b2
Then, c + = ∈ G.
1 d1 c
2 d2 c + c
1 2 d1 + d2
0 0
(iii) The identity element is ∈G
0 0
a b − a −b
(iv) The inverse of ∈G is ∈G .
c d −c − d
Thus G forms a group under matrix addition. Since matrix addition is
commutative, therefore G is an abelian group.
14 Group Theory
∴ AB ∈ G.
(ii) Matrix multiplication is always associative.
1 0
(iii) Let I = , then since | I | = 1 ≠ 0, we have I ∈ G.
0 1
Also AI = A = IA, ∀A ∈ G.
Therefore I is the identity element of G.
(iv) We also have for A ∈G, A ⋅ adj A = | A | I = adj A ⋅ A
1 1
⇒
A adj A = I = adj A A
| A| | A|
−1 1
Thus A = adj A ∈ G
| A|
Therefore G is a group under matrix multiplication.
a2 b2 a1 b1 a2 a1 + b2 c1 a2 b1 + b2 d1
and BA = = ...(2)
c2 d2 c1 d1 c2 a1 + d2 c1 c2 b1 + d2 d1
From (1) and (2), we get AB ≠ BA.
Therefore, the group GL(2, ) is non-abelian.
Groups 15
Example 1.14: The set of all 2 × 2 matrices with real entries is not a group under
matrix multiplication, as inverse of a matrix A does not exist when | A | = 0.
a a
Example 1.15: Let G = : a ∈ , a ≠ 0 . Then, G forms an abelian group
a a
with respect to matrix multiplication.
a a b b
(i) Let A= , B = ∈ G.
a a b b
Then as a ≠ 0 and b ≠ 0, we have ab ≠ 0.
a a b b 2ab 2ab
∴ AB = = ∈ G.
a a b b 2ab 2ab
Hence, G is closed.
(ii) Matrix Multiplication is always associative.
b b
(iii) Let ∈G be the identity element
b b
a a b b a a 2ab 2ab a a
Then a a b b = a a gives 2ab 2ab = a a
1
Þ
2ab = a or b=
2
a a 1/2 1/2 a a 1/2 1/2 a a
∴
a a 1/2 1/2 = a a = 1/2 1/2 a a .
1/2 1/2
Thus, 1/2 1/2 ∈ G is the identity element.
b b a a
(iv) Let ∈G be the inverse of ∈G
b b a a
a a b b 1/2 1/2 2ab 2ab 1/2 1/2
Then, a a b b = 1/2 1/2 Þ 2ab 2ab = 1/2 1/2
1 1
Þ
2ab = or b=
2 4a
a a 1 / 4a 1 / 4a 1/2 1/2 1 / 4a 1 / 4a a a
∴
a a 1 / 4a 1 / 4a = 1/2 1/2 = 1 / 4a 1 / 4a a a .
1 / 4a 1 / 4a a a
∴
1 / 4a 1 / 4a ∈ G is the inverse of the matrix a a ∈ G.
Thus, G forms a group under matrix multiplication.
Clearly, G is abelian because AB = BA for all A, B ∈ G.
16 Group Theory
a 0
Problem 1.6 Let G = : a ∈ , a ≠ 0 Show that G is a group with
2 a 0
respect to matrix multiplication.
1 0 1/a 0
Solution H ere, ∈G is the identity for G, ∈G is the inverse
2 0 2/a 0
a 0
of ∈G .
2a 0
In fact, G is an abelian group.
Problem 1.7 Show that the set of all 3 × 3 matrices of the form
1 a b
0 1 c : a, b, c ∈
0 0 1
is a group with respect to matrix multiplication.
Solution
1 a b 1 a′ b′
0 1 c , 0 1 c ′ ∈ G
(i) Let
0 0 1 0 0 1
1 a b 1 a′ b′ 1 a + a′ b′ + ac ′ + b
0 1 c 0 1 c ′ = 0 1 c ′ + c ∈ G
Then,
0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
∴ Closure property is satisfied.
Groups 17
1 a + a′ b′ + ac ′ + b 1 0 0
0 1 c ′ + c = 0 1 0
⇒
0 0 1 0 0 1
⇒ a + a¢ = 0, c + c¢ = 0 and b¢ + a(–c) + b = 0.
This gives a¢ = –a, c¢ = –c and b¢ = ac – b
1 a b 1 − a ac − b
0 1 c −c ∈ G.
∴ inverse of ∈ G is 0 1
0 0 1 0 0 1
Hence, G forms a group.
This group is called Heisenberg group†.
Problem 1.9 Show that the set G of all positive rational numbers is an abelian
group under the binary operation * defined by
ab
a * b = , a, b ∈G .
2
ab
Solution Closure follows as a ∗ b = ∈G , ∀ a, b ∈ G.
2
ab (ab)c a(bc) bc
(a ∗ b) ∗ c = ∗c = = = a ∗ = a ∗ (b ∗ c) ∀a, b, c ∈G
2 4 4 2
Therefore, associativity holds,
2 ∈ G is the identity and 4/a ∈ G is the inverse of any element a ∈ G.
ab ba
Also, a∗b = = = b ∗ a ∀ a, b ∈G
2 2
Therefore, G is an abelian group under the given binary operation *.
Remarks: We now recall some useful results in number theory to be used
in the next set of examples.
• Division algorithm: Let a and b be integers with b > 0. Then, there
exists unique integers q and r such that a = bq + r, 0 ≤ r < b.
• We say b divides a if and only if r = 0, i.e., b divides a if and only if
a = bq
• The greatest common divisor (gcd) of two integers a and b is the largest
of all common divisors of a and b, i.e., gcd(a, b) = d if and only if
(a) d/a and d/b
(b) If k/a and k/b, then k ≤ d.
• a and b are said to be relatively prime if and only if gcd(a, b) = 1.
• If gcd(a, b) = 1, then there exist integers x and y such that ax + by = 1.
• We have a ≡ b mod n, whenever n divides b – a.
⊕4 0 1 2 3
0 0 1 2 3
1 1 2 3 0
2 2 3 0 1
3 3 0 1 2
Since all the axioms of a group are satisfied, therefore, ( 4, ⊕4) is a group.
⊗8 1 3 5 7
1 1 3 5 7
3 3 1 7 5
5 5 7 1 3
7 7 5 3 1
It can be seen from the above table that for every a, b ∈ U(8), a ⊗8 b ∈ U(8).
The element 1 ∈ U(8) is the identity element. Also, the inverse of 1, 3, 5, 7 is
1, 3, 5 and 7 respectively.
Hence (U(8), ⊗8) is a group.
† Clearly, by definition of ⊕n
a + b, if a+b< n
a ⊕n b =
a + b − n, if a+b ≥ n
Groups 21
Similarly r ⊗na = 1.
Therefore, r = a−1.
Hence, U(n) forms a group w.r.t ⊗n (multiplication modulo n).
Also, since a ⊗nb = b ⊗na, for all a, b ∈ U(n), we have that the group U(n) is
abelian.
This group is called group of units†
† Here units refer to elements with a multiplicative inverse, which in this case are exactly
those co-prime to n
Groups 23
Remark:
Suppose in the set G, p is not prime. Then, there exists two integers
a and b such that 1 < a ≤ p − 1, 1 < b ≤ p − 1 and ab = p. Now
a, b ∈ G such that a ⊗p b = 0 and 0 ∉ G. Therefore, G is not closed w.r.t.
multiplication modulo p. Thus, (G, ⊗p) is not a group.
Caution: If we include 0 in the set G, then also, for this composition, G will
not be a group. The reason being, the inverse of 0 does not exist.
For example, the set {0, 1, 2, 3} is not a group under multiplication modulo 4.
Although 1 and 3 have inverses itself, the elements 0 and 2 do not.
Problem 1.11 Show that {1, 2, 3} under multiplication modulo 4 is not a group
but that {1, 2, 3, 4} under multiplication modulo 5 is a group.
Solution We first construct the Cayley table for {1, 2, 3} under multiplication
modulo 4
Table 1.8: Cayley Table under multiplication modulo 4
⊗4 1 2 3
1 1 2 3
2 2 0 2
3 3 2 1
⊗5 1 2 3 4
1 1 2 3 4
2 2 4 1 3
3 3 1 4 2
4 4 3 2 1
24 Group Theory
The set S is closed under multiplication modulo 5 and also associativity holds.
1 is the identity element. Also, inverse of 1 is 1, 2 is 3, 3 is 2 and 4 is 4.
Thus, S forms a group under multiplication modulo 5.
how that for all integers n ≥ 1, the set of complex roots of unity
Problem 1.12 S
k ⋅ 2π k ⋅ 2π
cos + i sin k = 0, 1, 2,..., n − 1
n n
is a group under multiplication.
Solution
2k π 2k π
We have, cos + i sin = ei 2 k π / n
n n
2 πi / n 4 πi / n 6 πi / n
Then G = {1, e ,e ,e , ... , e2( n−1) πi / n} = {1, ω, ω 2 , ω3 , ..., ω n−1},
where w = e2pi/n and wn = 1.
1/ n 1/ n
Remark: We have (1)1/n = (1 + 0i) = (cos 0 + i sin 0)
1/n
= (cos 2 k π + i sin 2 k π) , where k is any integer
2k π 2k π
= cos + i sin , by De’ Moivre’s Theorem
n n
i 2 kπ / n
= e .
Putting k = 0, 1, 2, ... , n – 1, we get the n, nth roots of unity.
Therefore the set of n, nth roots of unity is a finite abelian group with respect
to multiplication.
Groups 25
a b
Problem 1.13 Show that SL(2, F)† = A = : a, b, c, d ∈ F , | A | = 1 is a
c d
non-abelian group under matrix multiplication.
Here F can be or or or n.
Solution Let A, B ∈ SL(2, F), then | A | = 1 and | B | = 1.
Since | AB | = | A | · | B | = 1.1 = 1, therefore AB ∈ SL(2, F).
Thus, SL(2, F) is closed under matrix multiplication.
We know that matrix multiplication is always associative. Thus, associativity
holds.
1 0
Also, ∈ SL (2, F ) is the identity element.
0 1
a b d −b
Inverse of ∈ SL (2, F ) is −c a ∈ SL (2, F ) .
c d
Also, matrix multiplication is not commutative in general.
Therefore, SL(2, F) is a non-abelian group under matrix multiplication.
Problem 1.14 G ive an example of group elements a and b with the property
that a−1 ba ≠ a.
Solution Let us take the group as the set of matrices in SL(2, ).
a b a b2
Let a = 1 1 ∈ SL (2, R) and b = 2 ∈ SL (2, R).
c1 d1 c2 d2
∴ |a| = 1 and | b | = 1.
d −b1
The inverse of a, i.e., a −1 = 1 .
−c1 a1
Now
d1 −b1 a2 b2 a1 b1
a–1 ba =
−c1 a1 c2 d2 c1 d1
a2 d1 − b1c2 d1b2 − b1d2 a1 b1
=
−c1a2 + a1c2 −c1b2 + a1d2 c1 d1
a1a2 d1 − a1b1c2 + d1b2 c1 − b1d2 c1 a2 d1b1 − b1c2 b1 + d1d2 d1 − b1d2 d1
=
−c1a2 a1 + a1c2 a1 − c1b2 c1 + a1d2 c1 −c1a2 b1 + a1c2 b1 − c1b2 d1 + a1d2 d1
a1 b1
≠
c1 d1
∴ a–1ba ≠ a.
Problem 1.18 Let G = {2n : n ∈ Z}. Prove that G forms an abelian group
under usual multiplication.
Proof: For any 2m, 2n ∈ G, 2m · 2n = 2m+n ∈ G.
Thus closure holds.
Since multiplication of rationals is associative, therefore associativity holds.
1 = 20 ∈ G is the identity.
For any 2m ∈ G, as 2–m ∈ G and 2m · 2–m = 20 = 1,
We find each element of G has inverse.
Thus, G is a group.
Commutativity is obvious.
Problem 1.19 rove that the set n = {(a1, a2, ... , an) | a1, a2, ... , an ∈ } forms
P
a group under component-wise addition, i.e., (a1, a2, ... an)
+ (b1, b2, ... , bn) = (a1 + b1, a2 + b2, ... , an + bn).
n
(i) Closure: For (a1, a2, ... an), (b1, b2, ... , bn) ∈ , we have
n
(a1, a2, ... an) + (b1, b2, ... , bn) = (a1 + b1, a2 + b2, ... , an + bn) ∈ ,
as addition in is a binary operation.
\ n is closed under component-wise addition.
28 Group Theory
(ii) Associativity:
n
For (a1, a2, ... an), (b1, b2, ... , bn), (c1, c2, ... , cn) ∈ , we have
((a1, a2, ... an) + (b1, b2, ... , bn)) + (c1, c2, ... , cn)
= (a1 + b1, a2 + b2, ... an + bn) + (c1, c2, ... , cn)
= ((a1 + b1) + c1, (a2 + b2) + c2, ... , (an + bn) + cn)
= (a1 + (b1 + c1), a2 + (b2 + c2), ... , an + (bn + cn))
= (a1, a2, ... an) + (b1 + c1, b2 + c2, ... , bn + cn)
= (a1, a2, ... , an) + ((b1, b2, ... , bn) + (c1, c2, ... , cn))
n
\ Component-wise addition in
is associative.
n
(iii) Identity: (0, 0, ... , 0) ∈ is the identity as
(a1, a2, ... , an) + (0, 0, ... , 0) = (a1, a2, ... , an)
n
= (0, 0, ... , 0) + (a1, a2, ... , an) ∀ (a1, a2, ... , an) ∈
(iv) Inverse: ∀ (a1, a2, ... , an) ∈ n
∃ (–a1, –a2, ... , –an) ∈ n
(a1, a2, ... , an) + (–a1, –a2, ... , –an) = (0, 0, ... , 0)
= (–a1, –a2, ... , –an) + (a1, a2, ... , an)
n n
\ (–a1, –a2, ... , –an) ∈
is the inverse of (a1, a2, ... , an) ∈
n
Hence is a group under component-wise addition.
= Ta+ c, b+ d ( x, y) ∈T ( 2 )
∴ T( 2) is closed.
Also function composition is always associative. Therefore, associativity holds
in G.
2
The element T0,0 ∈ T ( ) is the identity as Ta, b T0,0 = Ta, b = T0,0 Ta, b .
2 2
The inverse of Ta, b ∈ T ( ) is T− a, −b ∈ T ( ).
Also T( 2) is abelian.
Therefore T( 2) is an abelian group under function composition.
The elements of T( 2) are called translations.
Groups 29
Problem 1.21 P rove that the set G = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5} is a finite abelian group
of order 6 with respect to addition modulo 6.
Solution The Cayley table for G is
Table 1.10: Cayley Table under addition modulo 6
⊕6 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 0 1 2 3 4 5
1 1 2 3 4 5 0
2 2 3 4 5 0 1
3 3 4 5 0 1 2
4 4 5 0 1 2 3
5 5 0 1 2 3 4
We see that all the entries in the composition table are elements of the set G.
Therefore, G is closed with respect to addition modulo 6.
Associativity: If a, b, c ∈ G, and if a⊕6b = d, then (a⊕6b) ⊕6 c = d⊕6c = e(say)
a + b = 6q + d and d + c = 6q1 + e.
This gives a + b + c = 6(q + q1 ) + e, 0 ≤ e < 6
Now, let b⊕6c = f. Then a⊕6 (b⊕6c) = a⊕6 f = g (say).
⇒ a + b + c = 6(q2 + q3 ) + g, 0 ≤ g < 6 .
Since e and g are remainders obtained by dividing a + b + c by 6, therefore e = g.
Thus, (a⊕6b) ⊕6c = a⊕6 (b⊕6c), ∀a, b, c ∈ G.
Identity: Since a⊕60 = a = 0 ⊕6a, ∀a ∈ G, we have that 0 is the identity of G.
Inverse: From the table, we see that the inverse of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 are 0, 5, 4,
3, 2, 1 respectively.
The composition is commutative as the corresponding rows and columns in the
composition table are identical.
The number of elements in the set G is 6. Therefore, (G, ⊕6) is a finite abelian
group.
Note that:
d −b
a b ad − bc ad − bc
• Generally, if A = , then A −1 =
c d −c a
ad − bc ad − bc
• Division by ad − bc has to be interpreted as multiplication by the
inverse of ad − bc (modulo n).
4 5
Illustration: G = GL(2, 7) w.r.t. multiplication, and A= , then
6 3
| A | = 12 − 30 = − 18 ≡ 3 (mod 7)
Also, inverse of 3 is 5 in the composition table for 7.
2 6
ind the inverse of A =
Problem 1.23 F in 11.
3 5
o f1 f2 f3 f4
f1 f1 f2 f3 f4
f2 f2 f1 f4 f3
f3 f3 f4 f1 f2
f4 f4 f3 f2 f1
Problem 1.25 Show that the set G = {f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6}, where
1 1
f1(x) = x, f2 ( x ) = 1 − x, f3 ( x ) = , f 4 ( x ) = ,
x 1− x
x −1 x
f5(x) = , f6 ( x ) = ∀x ∈ R − {0}
x 1− x
is a group with respect to composition of functions.
Solution The Cayley table for G is as follows:
Table 1.12: Cayley Table of G
o f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6
f1 f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6
f2 f2 f1 f5 f6 f3 f4
f3 f3 f4 f1 f2 f6 f5
f4 f4 f3 f6 f5 f1 f2
f5 f5 f6 f2 f1 f4 f3
f6 f6 f5 f4 f3 f2 f1
fact we show that certain formal properties which follow from the group axioms
hold in any group.
−1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1
Now, (ab)(b a ) = ((ab)b )a = (a(bb ))a = (ae)a = aa = e.
Similarly (b−1 a−1) (ab) = e and thus the result follows.
5. To show: (a1a2 ... an)–1 = an–1 an–1–1 ... a1–1 for a1, a2, ... , an in G
We prove the result by induction on n. Clearly the result holds for n = 1.
Suppose that the result holds for n = k, i.e.,
(a1 a2 ... ak)–1 = ak–1 ak–1–1 ... a1–1 …(i)
Now, (a1 a2 ... ak+1)–1 = ((a1 a2 ... ak) ak+1)–1
= (ak+1)–1 (a1 a2 ... ak)–1 [Using (4)]
= (ak+1)–1 (ak–1 ak–1–1 ... a1–1) [Using (i)]
= ak+1–1 ak–1 ... a1–1
Hence, the result holds for n = k + 1.
Thus, by induction, the result holds for all natural numbers n.
6. To prove the cancellation laws:
ab = ac ⇒ b=c and ba = ca ⇒ b = c ∀a, b, c ∈ G.
−1
−1 −1 −1
Let ab = ac, then b = eb = (a a)b = a (ab) = a (ac) = (a a)c = ec = c.
Thus, ab = ac Þ b = c, which is called the left cancellation law.
Now let ba = ca, then
b = be = b(aa −1 ) = (ba)a −1 = (ca)a −1 = c(aa –1 ) = ce = c.
Thus ba = ca Þ b = c, which is called the right cancellation law.
Remarks:
• In a semi-group, the cancellation laws may not hold.
Consider the following example:
Let S be the set of all 2 × 2 matrices over integers.
We know that S is a semi-group under multiplication.
1 0 0 0 0 0
Now, for A = ,B= and C = ∈ S , we note that
0 0 0 1 1 0
AB = AC but B ≠ C.
• There are semi-groups which are not groups but they satisfy cancellation
laws.
Consider the set of positive integers. We know that it is a semi-group
under addition.
Clearly, for any three positive integers a, b, c, we have
a + b = a + c Þ b = c and b + a = c + a Þ b = c.
So, the cancellation laws hold. But this semi-group is not a group (why ?).
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
CHAPTER XXIII
The forest was again under snow, lying silent beneath its deep white
mantle. Only the crows’ calls could be heard. Now and then came a
magpie’s noisy chattering. The soft twittering of the tit-mice sounded
timidly. Then the frost hardened and everything grew still. The air
began to hum with the cold.
One morning a dog’s baying broke the silence.
It was a continuous hurrying bay that pressed on quickly through
the woods, eager and clear and harrying with loud yelps.
Bambi raised his head in the hollow under the fallen tree, and
looked at the old stag who was lying beside him.
“That’s nothing,” said the old stag in answer to Bambi’s glance,
“nothing that need bother us.”
Still they both listened.
They lay in their hollow with the old beech trunk like a sheltering
roof above them. The deep snow kept the icy draught from them, and
the tangled bushes hid them from curious eyes.
The baying grew nearer. It was angry and panting and relentless.
It sounded like the bark of a small hound. It came constantly closer.
Then they heard panting of another kind. They heard a low
labored snarling under the angry barking. Bambi grew uneasy, but the
old stag quieted him again. “We don’t need to worry about it,” he said.
They lay silent in their warm hollow and peered out.
The footsteps drew nearer and nearer through the branches. The
snow dropped from the shaken boughs and clouds of it rose from the
earth.
Through the snow and over the roots and branches, the fox came
springing, crouching and slinking. They were right; a little, short-
legged hound was after him.
The fox came springing, crouching and slinking. A little, short-
legged hound was after him.
One of the fox’s forelegs was crushed and the fur torn around it.
He held his shattered paw in front of him, and blood poured from his
wound. He was gasping for breath. His eyes were staring with terror
and exertion. He was beside himself with rage and fear. He was
desperate and exhausted.
Once in a while he would face around and snarl so that the dog
was startled and would fall back a few steps.
Presently the fox sat down on his haunches. He could go no
farther. Raising his mangled forepaw pitifully, with his jaws open and
his lips drawn back, he snarled at the dog.
But the dog was never silent for a minute. His high, rasping bark
only grew fuller and deeper. “Here,” he yapped, “here he is! Here!
Here! Here!” He was not abusing the fox. He was not even speaking
to him, but was urging on someone who was still far behind.
Bambi knew as well as the old stag did that it was He the dog was
calling.
The fox knew it too. The blood was streaming down from him and
fell from his breast into the snow, making a fiery red spot on the icy
white surface, and steaming slowly.
A weakness overcame the fox. His crushed foot sank down
helpless, but a burning pain shot through it when it touched the cold
snow. He lifted it again with an effort and held it quivering in front of
him.
“Let me go,” said the fox beginning to speak, “let me go.” He
spoke softly and beseechingly. He was quite weak and despondent.
“No! No! No!” the dog howled.
The fox pleaded still more insistently. “We’re relations,” he
pleaded, “we’re brothers almost. Let me go home. Let me die with my
family at least. We’re brothers almost, you and I.”
“No! No! No!” the dog raged.
Then the fox rose so that he was sitting perfectly erect. He
dropped his handsome pointed muzzle on his bleeding breast, raised
his eyes and looked the dog straight in the face. In a completely
altered voice, restrained and embittered, he growled, “Aren’t you
ashamed, you traitor!”
“No! No! No!” yelped the dog.
But the fox went on, “You turncoat, you renegade.” His maimed
body was taut with contempt and hatred. “You spy,” he hissed, “you
blackguard, you track us where He could never find us. You betray
us, your own relations, me who am almost your brother. And you
stand there and aren’t ashamed!”
Instantly many other voices sounded loudly round about.
“Traitor!” cried the magpie from the tree.
“Spy!” shrieked the jay.
“Blackguard!” the weasel hissed.
“Renegade!” snarled the ferret.
From every tree and bush came chirpings, peepings, shrill cries,
while overhead the crows cawed, “Spy! Spy!” Everyone had rushed
up, and from the trees or from safe hiding places on the ground, they
watched the contest. The fury that had burst from the fox released an
embittered anger in them all. And the blood spilt on the snow, that
steamed before their eyes, maddened them and made them forget all
caution.
The dog stared around him. “Who are you?” he yelped. “What do
you want? What do you know about it? What are you talking about?
Everything belongs to Him, just as I do. But I, I love Him. I worship
Him, I serve Him. Do you think you can oppose Him, poor creatures
like you? He’s all-powerful. He’s above all of you. Everything we have
comes from Him. Everything that lives or grows comes from Him.”
The dog was quivering with exaltation.
“Traitor!” cried the squirrel shrilly.
“Yes, traitor!” hissed the fox. “Nobody is a traitor but you, only
you.”
The dog was dancing about in a frenzy of devotion. “Only me?” he
cried, “you lie. Aren’t there many, many others on His side? The
horse, the cow, the sheep, the chickens, many, many of you and your
kind are on His side and worship Him and serve Him.”
“They’re rabble!” snarled the fox, full of a boundless contempt.
Then the dog could contain himself no longer and sprang at the
fox’s throat. Growling, spitting, and yelping, they rolled in the snow, a
writhing, savagely snapping mass from which fur flew. The snow rose
in clouds and was spattered with fine drops of blood. At last the fox
could not fight any more. In a few seconds he was lying on his back,
his white belly uppermost. He twitched and stiffened and died.
The dog shook him a few times, then let him fall on the trampled
snow. He stood beside him, his legs planted, calling in a deep, loud
voice, “Here! Here! He’s here!”
The others were horrorstruck and fled in all directions.
“Dreadful,” said Bambi softly to the old stag in the hollow.
“The most dreadful part of all,” the old stag answered, “is that the
dogs believe what the hound just said. They believe it, they pass their
lives in fear, they hate Him and themselves and yet they’d die for His
sake.”
CHAPTER XXIV
The cold broke, and there was a warm spell in the middle of the
winter. The earth drank great draughts of the melting snows so that
wide stretches of soil were everywhere visible. The blackbirds were
not singing yet, but when they flew from the ground where they were
hunting worms, or when they fluttered from tree to tree, they uttered a
long-drawn joyous whistle that was almost a song. The woodpecker
began to chatter now and then. Magpies and crows grew more
talkative. The tit-mice chirped more cheerily. And the pheasants,
swooping down from their roosts would stand in one spot preening
their feathers and uttering their metallic throaty cacklings.
The pheasants, swooping down from their roosts, would stand
in one spot.
TRANSCRIBER NOTES
Misspelled words and printer
errors have been corrected.
Where multiple spellings occur,
majority use has been employed.
Punctuation has been maintained
except where obvious printer
errors occur.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK BAMBI ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.