Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experiment No. 2 - No Watermark
Experiment No. 2 - No Watermark
Experiment No. 2
GROUP NO. 4
Leader: CLETO, KATHLENE KAYE, S.
Members: DELA PEÑA, ELBERT JOHN, L.
DINOY, MAX PHILIP, M.
LAVITORIA, JOEMAR LYN
MENDARO, DARYLLE REIGN O.
MONTANTE, TYRON
NAVOR, MAUI XYREIA M.
VALENZUELA, PHOL ANDERSON
ZAPANTA, JIRAH
Submitted to:
ENGR. JUN A. TERESA
OBJECTIVE
EQUIPMENT REQUIRED
3. Set the V.adj knob on the DC Power Supply Module to the min. position.
Set the voltage control knob on the Synchronous Machine Exciter to the 0
position.
5. On the DC Power Supply Module, press the START button and slowly turn
the V.adj knob to increase the motor voltage until the generator rotates at the
its rated speed. Maintain the speed through this exercise. Note: The rated
speed of the generator (Three-phase Salient Pole Synchronous Machine) is
1,800 rpm for 60-Hz power (1,500 rpm for 50-Hz power).
8. Repeat step 7 for other field current If settings listed in Table 15-3-1.
Using the results of Table 15-3-1, plot the Io vs If curve on the graph of Fig.15-3-3.
Appendix D:
2. When the Generator or the Motor overheats, the power supply will be turned off
and the temperature indicator of Three-phase Power Supply Module (EM-3310-
1E) will light up.
Experimental Results
Eo vs. If
300 Curve
250 247 254.1
219.9230.6239.2
200 208.1
150 179.7188.5
155.8
134.6
117.8
97.1
Eo
100 72.1
50 48.2
29.5
0
0
If
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
(A)
IO
0 0.097 0.179 0.266 0.336 0.392
(A)
N
1826.4 1824 1816.8 1815.6 1812 1809 1803.6
(rpm)
Io vs. If
1. Curve
2
0.95
0.86 8
1 0.78 3
0. 0.69 1
8 0.61 5
0.55 4
0.
0.45 2
Io
6 0.39 7
0. 0.336 2
0.266
4 0.17
0. 0.09 9
2 0 7
0
0 0.0 0. 0.15 0. 0.2 0.
5 1 If 2 5 3
(A)
This graph among the field current and the armature current known as the short-
circuit characteristic (SCC):
You can observe that the graph is linear. To understand this straight-line behavior, let's
take a look at the equivalent circuit of the short-circuited synchronous generator shown
below:
This circuit allows you to calculate the value of the armature current (IA) using the
following equation:
IA = EA / (RA + jXS)
The magnitude of the armature current can be found using this formula:
IA = EA / √(R2A + X2S)
Additionally, the phasor diagrams of the short circuit test for the synchronous generator
are displayed below:
As the stator field Bs crosses the effect of the rotor magnetic field (B R) so the total field
Bnet has low value.
As the value of the Bnet is lesser so the generator is un-saturated short circuit
characteristic curve is linear.
To recognize what data these two features, have output, note from a given figure that the
Vt is 0.
From this figure, the interior impedance of the generator is given here:
Zs = √(R2A+X2s)
= EA/IA
Moreover, there are some issues with this technique in the measurement of the
synchronous reactance. As the internally generated voltage EA is measured from the
OCC at that point where the generator is partly saturated for a higher value of the field
current and the armature current (IA) is taken from the SCC where the generator is un-
saturated for all values of the field current.
So, at the larger field current, the internally generated voltage calculated from the
OCC at a specified value of the IF is not similar to the internally generated voltage
measured from the SCC at the same value of the field current IF.
This difference affects the value of the synchronous reactance X. Therefore, the result of
this method can be applied to the saturation point, the unsaturated XS can be measured by
this equation at any value of the IF in the straight-line part of the open-circuit
characteristic (OCC):
XS= EA/IA
The estimated value of XS fluctuates with the gradation of saturation of the open-
circuit characteristic curve, therefore the value of the X S to be used in a specified problem
must be measured at the estimated load on the generator.
This method does not give proper results because the alternating current
resistance is somewhat higher than the value of the direct current resistance.
REFERENCES:
Admin. (2018, April 25). Open circuit and short circuit characteristics of synchronous
circuit-characteristics-of-synchronous-machine/
Henry, & Henry. (2024, January 6). Open Circuit Test and Short Circuit Test of
Knowledge. https://www.theengineeringknowledge.com/open-circuit-test-and-
short-circuit-test-of-synchronous-generator/?fbclid=IwAR16s64nTK-
wIFjm4C9EuXgOKZFeGbGW3iddIMtfSQpQApTwLT6K8TaZAoI
CONCLUSION
The experiment provided valuable insights into the behavior of a salient pole
synchronous generator when it experiences short-circuit conditions. The information
gathered from this study is crucial for understanding the transient response of
synchronous generators during fault conditions on a power system.
In conclusion, this experiment aimed to contribute to the development of a better
understanding of the behavior of a salient pole synchronous generator under short-circuit
conditions. In addition, the experiment served as a valuable hands-on experience in
setting up, conducting, and analyzing measurements on a three-phase salient pole
synchronous generator. This reinforces the theoretical concepts learned in coursework
and provides a practical understanding of the machine's operation.
DINOY, MAX
MONTANTE,
MENDARO, DARYLLE REIGN O. TYRON
NAVOR, MAUI
VALENZUELA, PHOL
XYREIA M.
ANDERSON
ZAPANTA, JIRAH
TUP-COE-EE-001
Revision Status Date: March 2023
Non compliance Lacks some components Followed some standards Compliant Full Compliance SCORE
Criteria
1 2 3 4 5
1. Activity Member does not follow Member follows good and Member follows good and safe Member follows good and safe Member follows good and safe
Conduct / good and safe laboratory safe laboratory practice some laboratory practice most of the time laboratory practice at all times laboratory practice at all times in
Safety of practice in the conduct of of the time in the conduct of in the conduct of activity. in the conduct of activity. the conduct of activity and
students & the activity. activity. encourages others to do the
equipment same.
2. Equipment Member is unable to Member is able to operate Member is able to operate Member is able to operate Member is able to operate
Operation and operate the equipment equipment and instrument equipment and instrument with equipment and instrument with equipment and instrument with
Material and instruments. with much supervision. supervision. ease and minimum supervision. ease and without supervision.
Handling
3. Data The group has presented The group has presented The group has presented partially The group has presented The group has presented
Collection mostly irrelevant data. relevant but incomplete and relevant and accurate, relevant relevant and almost complete relevant complete and accurate
inaccurate data. data. and accurate data. data.
4. Data There are many There are some inaccuracies Analysis is partially correct. The Analysis is correct. The group Analysis is correct. The group
Analysis and inaccuracies in analysis. in analysis. The group did group recognized some errors and recognized some errors and recognized some errors and links
Evaluation The group did not attempt attempt to make some links inaccuracies in the processed, links to prior knowledge to prior knowledge inaccuracies
(DISCUSSION) to make some links to prior to prior knowledge. manipulated and presented data. inaccuracies in the processed, in the processed, manipulated
knowledge. The group is able to make some manipulated and presented and presented data. The group is
links to prior knowledge. data. The group is able to make able to relate presented data to
some links to prior knowledge. other knowledge.
5. Results The group has no The group has vague The group has clear and logical The group has clear and logical The group has clear and logical
Interpretation interpretation of data and interpretation of data and interpretation of data and attempts interpretation of data and is interpretation of data and is able
(CONCLUSION has invalid conclusion. conclusion is fundamentally to identify trends from the data. able to draw some conclusions to draw suitable accurate
) flawed. from the data. conclusions from the data.
Total Score
Mean Score = (Total Score / 5)
Percentage Score = (Total Score / 25) * 100%
Other Comments / Observations
Evaluated By:
______________________________________ _________________________
Printed Name and Signature of Faculty Member Date