Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presentation 3
Presentation 3
Samuel Oliver-Sherry
This presentation will take the form of two
short parts
PART 1: Biography
• Examining Joachim’s legacy within nineteenth century musical life
• Outlining his relationship with the Schumann’s and members of their
circle
PART 2: Music (N.B: this section will contain sound examples.)
• Showcasing the music written and dedicated to Joachim, both violin
and non-violin repertoire.
• Focusing on two short case studies of works dedicated to Joachim by
both Robert and Clara Schumann
Early Career
28.06.1831:
• Born to Julius and Fanny Joachim in Köpcsény, Hungary (now known as Kittsee, in Austria)
• Seventh of eight children
1836:
• Studies violin with Polish violinist Stanisław Serwaczyński, the concertmaster of the opera in Pest (where family moved three years earlier)
• Said to be the best violinist in Pest (Joachim’s parents told not to choose an ordinary teacher)
1839:
• Continued his studies at the Vienna Conservatory, most significantly with Joesph Bohm who introduces chamber music to him
1843:
• Taken by his cousin to live and study in Leipzig
• Début performance in the Gewandhaus: Joachim played the Otello Fantasy by Heinrich Wilhelm Ernst.
27.05.1844:
• Played the solo part in Beethoven's Violin Concerto with the Royal Philharmonic Society in London
• Philharmonic had a policy against performers so young, but Joachim’s clear maturity and talent granted exception
• Beethoven’s concerto had previously been seen as poor and second-rate, but Joachim is solely responsible for bringing it to public
popularity that it is known for today.
Members of Schumann’s circle before he meets them
Felix Mendelssohn: Franz Liszt:
• In the journal Neue Zeitschrift für Musik Robert Schumann • Liszt took residence in Weimar in 1848,
was highly enthusiastic about Felix Mendelssohn, who and was determined to re-establish the
had become director of the Leipzig Gewandhaus town's reputation as the Athens of
orchestra in 1835 Germany, particularly in a cultural sense.
• As Joachim moves to Leipzig in 1843, he became a protégé • Joachim was amongst the first of his young
of Mendelssohn, who arranged for him to study theory avant-garde disciples, vocally opposed to
and composition with Moritz Hauptmann and violin with the conservatism of the Leipzig circle. He
Ferdinand David. served as concertmaster, and embraced
• Mendelssohn conducted his first performance of the the new “psychological music”.
Beethoven Violin Concerto in London (1844), and • In 1852, however, he moved to Hanover,
expected great outcomes of the concert – he wrote of marking his dissociation from these
the "frenetic applause" as soon as Joachim stepped in musical ideals that now included
front of the orchestra, as well as how the "cheers of the composers like Berlioz and Wagner. His
audience accompanied every [...] part of the concerto.“ break with Liszt became final in 1857,
• Joachim had great respect for Mendelssohn also, calling when he wrote to him essentially saying
his violin concerto “the most inward, the heart's jewel” that he couldn’t sympathise with his
in describing four of the great Austro-German concertos style anymore.
(alongside Beethoven, Brahms and Bruch).
The Schumanns and Joachim
• In 1853, Joachim was invited to perform Beethoven’s violin • Their first recital tour together was October–November • Like Clara Schumann among pianists, he represented a
concerto at the Lower Rhine Music Festival, by a 1857, where they took to the German cities of Dresden, new species of ‘ascetic’ violinist, subordinating himself to
committee headed by Robert Schumann. He was very Leipzig, and Munich. the composer rather than glorying in his virtuoso
successful, heralded as the most renowned musician in • St. James's Hall, opened in 1858, hosted a series of technique. This philosophy drew him inevitably to
Germany, but left a lasting impression on Robert "Popular Concerts" of chamber music, of which chamber music.
Schumann and his wife Clara, who were deeply impressed programmes from 1867 through 1904 are preserved. 18 • Joachim's solo repertory remained relatively restricted. As
and formed a close connection with Joachim in the years of these feature Clara and Joachim, alongside other a soloist he concentrated on just a handful of works:
to come. esteemed musicians like J. B. Zerbini (viola) and Alfredo Bach’s solo sonatas, the violin concertos of Beethoven,
• In December 1854, Joachim became the first person who Piatti (cello). These concerts will have included works Mendelssohn, Brahms, Viotti, and Spohr, and his own
visited Robert at the Endenich asylum where he had been such as piano quartets and piano trios, but on occasions works.
since February. After Robert's mental breakdown in 1854 where Ferdinand Ries (violin) is listed, some string • It was Joachim who initiated entire recitals devoted to
and death in 1856, Joachim and Clara Schumann quartets without Clara will have been performed. string quartets, and in them he presented the entire
remained lifelong friends sharing musical views (such as • Over her career, Schumann gave over 238 concerts with classical repertory, from Haydn to Brahms.
expressing the music over the performer, for instance) Joachim in Germany and Britain, more than with any
and frequently performing together. other artist. The two were particularly noted for their
playing of Beethoven's violin sonatas.
1899:
• Joachim was invited to become president of the newly established Oxford & Cambridge Musical Club in London. He
remained club president until his death.
• He had already received an honorary Doctorate of Music from Cambridge University in 1877.
1903
• Joachim recorded five sides for The Gramophone & Typewriter Ltd (G&T), a fascinating and valuable source of information
about nineteenth century styles of violin playing to this day.
• These illustrations document his subtle command of rubato, his long-arched phrasing, and his sparing use of vibrato.
• He is the earliest violinist of distinction known to have recorded, followed by Pablo de Sarasate.
1907
• Dies at the age of 76, in Berlin
●
Concertos for violin ●
Works for violin and ●
Notable others
piano
●
R. Schumann: Violin ●
Various: F-A-E Sonata M. Bruch: Symphony No.2
Concerto in D Minor, WoO in F Minor, Op.36
23
●
M. Bruch: Violin Concerto ●
C. Schumann: Three R. Schumann: Symphony
No.1 in G Minor, Op.26 Romances, Op.22 No.4 in D Minor, Op.120
M. Bruch: Violin Concerto ●
P. de Sarasate: Spanish J. Brahms: Concerto for
No.3 in D Minor, Op.58 Dances, Op.21 Violin & Cello, Op.102
●
A. Dvorak: Violin Concerto ●
F. Ries: Suite No.1 for J. Brahms: Piano Sonata
in A Minor, Op.53 Violin and Piano, Op.26 No.1 in C Major, Op.1
●
J. Brahms: Violin Concerto ●
A. Rubenstein: Nine F. Liszt: Hungarian
in D Minor, Op.77 Salon Pieces, Op.11 Rhapsody No.12 in C#
Minor
M. Bruch: Damajanti, Op.78
• Joachim met Brahms for the first time earlier that year (1852) on a
tour in Göttingen.
• It is unclear as to exactly why this work is dedicated to Joachim, but
Why piano music? a few theories point towards:
• Its extreme virtuosity and brilliant character, akin to much
of Joachim’s showpieces.
• Beethoven’s heavy influence: Joachim was partly
responsible for maintaining his legacy though
rediscovering the Violin Concerto and championing the
string quartets
• The first movement of this piece heavily resembles the
Hammerklavier Sonata, both in terms of virtuosity and
texture.
• However, it is most likely that Brahms dedicated this piece to him as
he very much aided its publication. When he met the then-
unknown 20-year-old composer, Joachim instantly recommended
Johannes Brahms: Piano Sonata in C Major, Op.1 him to Schumann.
Peter Rosen, piano • As such, this piece (with his second sonata) was sent to Breitkopf &
Härtel with a letter of recommendation from Robert Schumann,
and this work shows signs of an effort to impress in its symphonic
grandeur, technical demands, and dramatic character
• Both Schumann and Joachim were the first to praise Brahms in the
enthusiastic manner that would greet his later music.
• Unlike the Brahms, however, there are several
reasons why Joesph Joachim is a good fit as a
dedication for Liszt’s twelfth Hungarian
Why piano music?
Rhapsody:
• Joachim was Hungarian! He would go on
arrange all 21 of Brahms’ Hungarian
Dances for violin and piano, as well as
this piece later (but not the others), and
up until that point Liszt had dedicated all
of his Hungarian Rhapsodies to different
important Hungarians in a vast array of
disciplines – the only non-Hungarian to
be dedicated was Hans von Bulow
(no.14).
• This is much more akin to the showpieces
and technical brilliance that Joachim
displayed in his own repertory and
compositions. Liszt’s Hungarian Franz Liszt: Hungarian Rhapsody No.12 in C# minor
Rhapsodies are very much capriccioso in Evgeny Kissin, piano
character, very much appealing to
nineteenth century performance standard
at the time, and the virtuosity of this
Clara Schumann: Three Romances, Op.22
Clara Schumann, Three Romances, Op.22 No.1 Robert Schumann, Violin Sonata, Op.105 Mov.1
Janine Jansen, violin (1:16) Ara Malikian, violin
Clara Schumann, Three Romances, Op.22 No.2 Clara Schumann, Three Romances, Op.22 No.3 Joesph Joachim, Drei Stucke, Op.2 No.1
Janine Jansen, violin (0:36) Clara-Jumi Kang, violin (3:10) Daniel Hope, violin (1:30; 4:00)
• The last two romances, however, are more nuanced when considering performative allusions to Joachim.
This time, however, it alludes to a performance of Clara Schumann with Joachim of Joachim, his own
Romance in B-Flat Major, Op. 2 No.1.
• In Op. 22 No. 2, bar 27, Schumann explores an expressive diminished-seventh leap, E ♭–F♯, which also features
prominently in Joachim’s romance.
• In No.3, while the key centre of B-Flat is shared among the two works, the final passages of both Romances present a
cascading line in quaver-notes from E♭–C–A–F–E ♭ in the high register of the violin, with only a minor difference of a
G♭ present in Schumann’s descent.
• These are merely ‘moments of familiarity’, an in-joke by performers performing these pieces back-to-
back. However, for us it highlights their close interaction in 1853 which evidently allowed a true
partnership to emerge.
●
182 ●
Robert Schumann, Romanze in F minor, fragment, for piano solo (Schumann, Thematisch-
9 Bibliographisches Werkverzeichnis F2)
183
Clara and Joesph’s goals in
●
●
Clara Wieck, Romance variée in C major, Op. 3, for piano solo
3
composing Op. 22 and Op. 2 seem to ●
183 ●
Robert, Romanze in B♭ major, Albumblätter, Op. 124 No. 11 (published 1854), for piano solo
5
be quite similar, in that both bypass ●
183 ●
Clara, Romanze in A♭ major, second movement of Piano Concerto in A minor, Op. 7
the most famous violin romance 5
●
183
model referenced in standard 6
●
Clara, Romance in B major, Pièces caractéristiques, Op. 5 No. 3, for piano solo
dictionaries: ●
183
8
●
Robert, Romanze in D minor, Scherzo, Gigue, Romanze und Fughette, Op. 32 No. 3 (published 1839)
• rondo form ●
183 ●
Robert, Romanze in G minor, Faschingsschwank aus Wien, Op. 26 No. 2
9
• pastoral and topical connotations ●
183 ●
Clara, Trois Romances in E♭ minor, G minor and A♭ major, Op. 11, for piano solo (published
9 1840);
• an orchestral accompaniment ●
183 ●
Robert, Drei Romanzen in B♭ minor, F♯ major and B major, Op. 28, for piano solo (published
9 1840)
Schumann and Joachim instead ●
184 ●
Robert, Symphony No. 4 in D minor, Op. 120, Romanze in A minor (revised 1851)
1
allowed the romance to be less ●
184 ●
Robert, Romanze in A minor, Fantasiestücke, Op. 88 No. 1, for violin, cello and piano (published
formally standardized, freer in its 2 1850)
●
184
harmonic language and rich in 8
●
Robert, Kleine Romanze in A minor, Album für die Jugend, Op. 68 No. 19, for piano