Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Co-Curricular Activities in Secondary Schools

in India and England

Name (s)

ES1 Assignment

EDUM074

International Perspectives on Education

Word count: 3500 words

 Table of Contents
Introduction................................................................................................................................3
Literature Review.......................................................................................................................4
Overview of the Co-Curricular Educational Context in India...................................................7
Overview of the Co-Curricular Educational Context in England..............................................9
Comparative Analysis..............................................................................................................12
Conclusion and Recommendations..........................................................................................15
References................................................................................................................................16

Page 2 of 18
 Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Co-Curricular Activities in Secondary Schools

in India and England

Introduction

Co-curricular activities refer to non-academic programmes and activities undertaken

by students that complement their educational experience. Such activities commonly include

sports, arts, cultural groups, leadership roles and community service opportunities. While

separate from mainstream curriculum learning, co-curricular participation plays a significant

role in students' holistic development during secondary education. These activities aim to

foster a wide range of skills beyond academic abilities. According to Annu and Sunita (2015,

p.53), research has linked involvement in areas like team sports, music and drama to

enhanced traits such as communication, time management, leadership and social skills. Co-

curriculars also promote values like citizenship, resilience and character building. Generally,

given these outcomes, most education systems now recognise co-curricular activities as

integral to providing a well-rounded education for adolescents.

In contemporary secondary schools in many countries, co-curricular activities

normally play a critical role in shaping the holistic development of student’s development by

helping foster diverse skills beyond the academic domain. Participation in such programmes

during the important transitional stage of secondary education allows young people to explore

diverse interests, gain valuable life experiences, build social capital and cultivate attributes

not readily addressed within formal classroom learning (Ghoshal, 2016, p.48). Through

involvement in sports, cultural pursuits, leadership initiatives and volunteer activities,

teenagers are able to boost their communication abilities, time management, resilience,

teamwork capacities and character values.

Given the emphasis currently placed on metrics like test scores, co-curricular

activities provide balanced avenues for well-rounded growth, equipping youth with

Page 3 of 18
competencies increasingly demanded by universities and employers alike. As such,

supporting co-curricular provision must be viewed as integral for education systems aiming

to deliver enriching, impactful schooling experiences (Syed and Akram, 2023, p.34).

However, approaches and levels of priority attributed to such provisions vary significantly

between countries. This essay compares and contrasts the impact of co-curricular activities in

secondary schools in India and England with particular focus on the diverse approaches to

and perceptions of co-curricular activities in secondary schools in the two countries.

Literature Review

Co-curricular activities encompass a wide variety of programmes that extend beyond

traditional academic lessons. Broad categories include sports, cultural groups, leadership

roles, community service initiatives and skills-based clubs. Sports activities range from

individual pursuits developing fitness, discipline and strategic skills like athletics or

swimming to team sports fostering values of cooperation, communication and sportsmanship

through football, cricket and basketball. Cultural clubs involve areas allowing students to

explore creative talents and build confidence through music, dance and drama performances

or develop public speaking, reasoning and research abilities in debating societies (Annu and

Sunita, 2015, p.55). Leadership roles consist of representative positions on student councils

or captaincy of sports teams and clubs to gain experience in organization, motivation and

role-modelling. Meanwhile, community service involves volunteer work assisting local

charities, schools, hospitals and other organizations to promote values of empathy, social

responsibility and civic participation.

Several theoretical frameworks underpin educational research on co-curricular

participation. Firstly, experiential learning theory postulates that hands-on learning

experiences gained outside of formal class time aid in more holistic development for students.

Kolb (1984, p.10) proposed learning is a continuous process whereby knowledge is created

Page 4 of 18
through transformation of experiences. Through activities like sports, clubs or volunteer

work, students are actively engaged in concrete experiences that form the basis of observation

and reflection. This observation then leads to the formation of abstract concepts informing

new implications for action, which are tested in future experiences. Rather than purely

theoretical or academic learning, the experiential aspect of co-curricular activities provides

multidimensional opportunities that develop both intellectual muscles and social-emotional

skills.

On the other hand, multiple intelligence theory suggests learning and development

can be enhanced by exposure to diverse opportunities that play to individuals’ varied

strengths and intelligences. Gardner (1983, p.78) theorized intelligence encompasses domains

beyond linguistic and logic-mathematical strengths typically addressed within traditional

schooling. Co-curricular participation allows students with strengths in areas like physical

coordination, musical-rhythmic abilities or interpersonal skills to engage through

corresponding avenues like sports, band or leadership roles. By catering to different interests,

students are motivated through activities aligning with their proclivities. This exposure helps

nurture talents that may otherwise go undeveloped but still contribute to overall growth and

success in disparate ways. Lastly, social capital theory recognizes the crucial role social

relationships and networks play in positive youth development. Extracurricular involvement

provides opportunities to form relationships with peers, mentors and community members

that form webs of contacts and information channels promoting both personal wellbeing and

upward mobility (Putnam, 2000). Participating in groups requires skills in teamwork and

collaboration that carry benefits reaching beyond individual experiences to society as a

whole.

A number of studies concur that national culture and socio-economic factors normally

present strong influences on co-curricular participation levels. In more collectivist societies

Page 5 of 18
that prioritize community and group effort such as India, activities involving teams, clubs and

volunteerism hold greater value as character-building compared to individual pursuits

(Hofstede, 2001, p.4). However, access barriers also exist that disadvantage certain

demographic groups. Lower-income students in both India and England face constraints

participating due to costs of equipment, transportation, and lost wages from informal jobs

(ASER, 2018). Additionally, international studies show girls and youth from disadvantaged

socioeconomic backgrounds tend to participate less frequently due to socio-cultural norms

discouraging activities for females and economic pressures preventing allocation of limited

resources (Cameron et al., 2019, p.67). These contextual factors must be acknowledged when

researching outcomes, as they shape both the nature and distribution of extracurricular

involvement opportunities across societies.

Moreover, a wealth of research has evaluated the outcomes of co-curricular

participation. Large-scale studies utilizing quantitative data have found involvement to be

associated with significant benefits to students' overall development. These include improved

physical health, psychological wellbeing, and socio-emotional skills such as self-efficacy,

teamwork and leadership (Awartani et al., 2019, p.4). However, the degree and specifics of

impact have varied depending on moderating factors such as the type of activity, duration and

intensity of involvement, as well as individual motivations for participating (OECD, 2017,

p.14). Additionally, in diverse educational contexts around the world, researchers have found

co-curricular engagement impacts domains such as academic achievement, employability

after graduation, and development of civic values and behaviours differently according to the

varying priorities within national education systems. Together, theory and findings highlight

the scope of co-curricular activities while underscoring the need to consider cultural and

structural influences when assessing effectiveness within individual national education

Page 6 of 18
settings thereby providing context for the present comparative analysis of approaches and

outcomes in India and England.

Overview of the Co-Curricular Educational Context in India

India has a large and diverse secondary education system that aims to provide

universal access to students aged 14-18. After primary schooling that typically ends around

age 10-12, students enter either state education boards overseen by individual state

governments or one of the national boards including the Central Board of Secondary

Education (CBSE) and the Indian Certificate of Secondary Education (ICSE). In these

secondary schools, students follow a curriculum studying core academic subjects like

English, mathematics, sciences, social sciences as well as one or two modern/regional

languages. Additionally, some Indian secondary schools offer electives allowing students to

pursue vocational or skill-based subjects according to their strengths and post-education goals

(Indian Policy Foundation, 2016, p.1).

Co-curricular activities, also commonly known as “student welfare activities” play an

important role in Indian secondary education. Popular activities that students regularly

participate in include sports, dance, music, theatre programs as well as volunteering through

initiatives like the National Cadet Corps (NCC) and National Service Scheme (NSS) that

promote national integration and community service. Cultural traditions and India's diverse

regional cultures have heavily influenced the choice of extracurricular activities in each state

and union territory. Classical Indian dance forms rooted in centuries-old regional styles like

Bharatanatyam from the south and Chhau from eastern states remain very common in school

dance programs. Additionally, India's strong passion for sports is reflected in the widespread

popularity of participation sports like cricket, football, field hockey and kabaddi at the inter-

school and national levels. Opportunities to explore both traditional art forms and modern

Page 7 of 18
sports have made co-curricular participation a vibrant part of the educational experience for

many secondary students across the country.

In India, deep-rooted cultural factors and traditions in parts of the country have

historically contributed to the prevalence of gender biases seen in co-curricular activity

participation among secondary students (Teimoornia et al.2021, p.1138). While overall

involvement of girls has been rising in recent decades due to progressive governmental

policies, certain activities remain more gender-stereotyped than others. Cultural perceptions

of femininity versus masculinity have meant activities like classical dance and theatre have

traditionally drawn greater proportions of female students, while male participation

dominates sports perceived as masculine areas like cricket.

Moreover, socio-economic status also presents barriers, as lower-income families that

struggle to afford basic amenities may be less able or willing to support children's

involvement in extracurricular activities that require significant financial resources or time

commitments. However, the Indian government has implemented various initiatives through

schemes like the Kanya Kelavni programs that aim to promote gender equity and remove

economic hurdles restricting disadvantaged students' access to the developmental benefits of

participating in a diverse range of co-curricular options (Indian Policy Foundation, 2016,

p.6).

Moreover, research on the educational outcomes of co-curricular participation in

Indian secondary schools has found various cognitive, academic, social-emotional, and

character benefits. Studies have shown improved leadership qualities, self-confidence,

communication abilities and teamwork skills develop through regular activities. Participation

in community service programs under NCC and NSS also helps instil important values like

societal responsibility and national unity among youth. Quantitative studies further point to a

positive correlation between extracurricular involvement and higher academic performance

Page 8 of 18
on exams, better attendance and punctuality in school, as well as reduced risky behaviours

among adolescents (Ofsted, 2015, p.45). However, challenges persist in maximizing these

outcomes consistently across the country due to issues like insufficient infrastructure support

for various activities, a shortage of trained instructors and coaches, and difficulties

monitoring longitudinal impact in India's vastly diverse education system encompassing

urban and rural regions with disparate resources. Addressing such implementation barriers

remains pivotal for realizing co-curricular programs' full developmental potential.

Overall, research on the educational outcomes of co-curricular participation in Indian

secondary schools has found various cognitive, academic, social-emotional, and character

benefits. Studies have shown improved leadership qualities, self-confidence, communication

abilities and teamwork skills develop through regular activities. Participation in community

service programs under NCC and NSS also helps instil important values like societal

responsibility and national unity among youth. Quantitative studies further point to a positive

correlation between extracurricular involvement and higher academic performance on exams,

better attendance and punctuality in school, as well as reduced risky behaviours among

adolescents. However, challenges persist in maximizing these outcomes consistently across

the country due to issues like insufficient infrastructure support for various activities, a

shortage of trained instructors and coaches, and difficulties monitoring longitudinal impact in

India's vastly diverse education system encompassing urban and rural regions with disparate

resources. Addressing such implementation barriers remains pivotal for realizing co-

curricular programs' full developmental potential.

Overview of the Co-Curricular Educational Context in England

England has a national curriculum guiding secondary education which is delivered

across key stages 3 and 4. The curriculum is mandated for all state schools for students ages

11 through 16 years old. During this period, which spans years 7 through 11, students

Page 9 of 18
undertake a balanced academic program focused around core subjects like English, maths and

sciences (Teimoornia et al.2021, p.1139). They also study additional disciplines such as

history, geography, modern foreign languages, art, music, physical education and

design/technology. The national curriculum framework aims to deliver a broad and balanced

set of learning opportunities during these foundational secondary school years, equipping

young people with skills across both core STEM fields as well as humanities, creative arts

and practical subjects. It forms the basis of students' formal educational experience before

they pursue qualifications like GCSEs and choice of pathways leading to further education,

employment or training.

English secondary schools offer students a wide variety of extracurricular

opportunities to engage in beyond the national curriculum. Common activities that many

participate in include competitive inter-school sports both for recreation as well as

representation, such as popular team sports like football, cricket and rowing (Annu and

Sunita, 2015, p.58). In addition, schools support creative outlets through art, drama and

musical clubs and ensembles. Academic enrichment is also provided through subject-specific

clubs where students can deeper their passions, along with opportunities to develop

leadership skills like debating societies.

Moreover, in addition to sports clubs and academic societies, many English secondary

schools offer students opportunities to volunteer through organized community service

programs that allow them to give back and develop leadership abilities outside the classroom.

Some schools also elect older pupils to serve as prefects or house captains where they take on

responsibilities like mentoring younger students. The broad selection of extracurricular

options found in schools aims to accommodate the wide range of talents, skills and interests

across the student population. Whether students wish to pursue sports, crafts, debates or

performances, there are structured platforms for supporting these diverse avenues of

Page 10 of 18
development. Cultural enrichment is also provided through long-standing traditions like

yearly school plays and concerts (Ghoshal, 2016, p.51). Consequently, the rich co-curricular

landscape provides both formal and informal spaces that flexibly allow young people to

explore their strengths, find companionship in shared activities, and grow in confidence

through experiences that complement their academic studies.

When compared to the co-curricular system prevalent in India, activities within

English secondary schools generally place a relatively higher emphasis on individual athletic

or scholarly pursuits as well as inter-school competitive sports fixtures. This contrast stems

partly from underlying cultural differences prioritizing more solo talents versus group

performances. Additionally, extracurricular clubs and societies within English schools

predominantly specialize around narrow academic disciplines or hobbies rather than take

broad forms encompassing diverse regional arts. The ample facilities and resources accessible

to many schools also enable participation in activities like Frisbee, golf and aquatic sports

that have less widespread popularity in India potentially due to differing regional

participation traditions and access to infrastructure (Fredricks, 2012, p.23). These

comparative distinctions are underpinned by diverse socio-cultural mind-sets shaping the

approaches taken towards developing young people's skills through extra-lesson experiences.

Studies conducted on the effects of involvement in co-curricular activities for English

secondary students have found numerous positive impacts. Research shows participation

helps develop students' inter-personal skills, leadership qualities, and mental resilience, all of

which aid career prospects and employability (Ghoshal, 2016, p.54). Quantitative data also

links extracurricular engagement to improved retention of pupils within the education system,

higher university attendance rates post-compulsory education, and advantageous long-term

occupational outcomes. Nonetheless, barriers persist that prevent equitable access to these

benefits, such as lower-income backgrounds limiting financial resources and rural isolation

Page 11 of 18
hampering availability of provisions. Disparities also emerge along gender lines, with

subject-specific clubs like engineering societies sometimes discouraging female participation

due to cultural narratives favouring male dominance in STEM over creative arts. Addressing

such impediments remains imperative to maximize the developmental impacts of the rich co-

curricular landscape.

Generally, while research into the educational impacts of extracurricular participation

in England has shown largely promising outcomes, systematically evaluating effects on a

national scale faces challenges. One key barrier is the lack of centralized tracking

mechanisms to uniformly gather data on patterns of involvement across diverse student

demographics. Measuring long-term benefits is also difficult. Additionally, infrastructure and

resource constraints mean opportunities are not always evenly distributed, with shortages

outside major urban hubs reducing provision quality and accessibility. Despite attempts to

promote inclusion through initiatives like means-tested bursaries, socioeconomic barriers and

geographical hurdles continue hampering equal access. As such, developing robust

monitoring systems and addressing structural inequalities remain important to optimize the

learning augmentation attained through the rich ecosystem of activities.

Comparative Analysis

There are several similarities and differences regarding the potential impacts of co-

curricular activities in Indian secondary schools and English secondary schools. Firstly, when

it comes to the similarities, both the Indian and English secondary education systems

acknowledge the importance of co-curricular and extracurricular programs, respectively, in

providing students with holistic development complementing traditional academic lessons. A

key similarity shared between the two countries is that both support a widely varied

assortment of activities at the national level across school environments (Ghoshal, 2016,

p.56). These diverse options aim to nurture growth in multiple domains beyond the

Page 12 of 18
classroom, incorporating academic enrichment through subject-focused clubs; cultural

exposure via music, art and theatre programs; and community spirit through volunteering

opportunities. By embracing academic, cultural and service-oriented activities, the co-

curricular frameworks in India and extracurricular landscapes in England similarly seek to

foster a breadth of skills like leadership, collaboration and civic participation that augment

students' learning experiences and prepare them for future careers and roles in society.

While both countries recognize the value of supplementary activities, key differences

arise due to divergent underlying cultural priorities that have helped shape distinct

approaches. India's co-curricular system generally places stronger emphasis on collaborative

group engagement through inclusive cultural programs celebrating traditional regional art

forms, reflecting the nation's priority on community and shared heritage. In contrast,

activities in England exhibit a relatively higher prioritization of competitiveness at both the

individual level through athletics as well as school-versus-school sporting matches,

demonstrating cultural norms favouring solo talents and competition. Additionally, Indian

programs exhibit a more harmonized structure encompassing diverse arts, whereas

extracurricular clubs in England tend to be more specialized and narrow in focus on specific

topics or hobbies, again influenced by differing preferences for generalization versus

specialization. These variations stem from dissimilar underlying social and historical

influences that have led each system down different developmental paths.

Educationally, while research has demonstrated significant educational advantages to

participation in co-curricular and extracurricular programs in both India and England, the

nature and measurement of outcomes is also culturally shaped. Across both nations,

involvement has been associated with enhanced academic achievement, social-emotional

competence, and overall health and wellness. However, cultural mindsets influence priority

outcomes. For example, statistical studies in England tend to quantitatively correlate activity

Page 13 of 18
engagement with elevated career prospects, university enrolment rates, and long-term

occupational attainment, aligned with that society placing strong emphasis on individual

success. Meanwhile in India, where community and character development take precedence,

qualitative investigations tend to emphasize co-curricular involvement strengthens moral

values and builds well-rounded personalities. This demonstrates how inherent cultural

worldviews not only mould program structures but also impact perceived indicators of

educational benefit, despite shared goal of holistically preparing young minds for life beyond

secondary school.

The differing terminology used in both countries is reflective of divergent underlying

cultural perspectives toward education systems. While England refers to supplemental

programs as "extracurricular", implying they fall outside the formal curriculum, India sees

equivalent activities as fully "co-curricular", indicative of their integral role within the

learning process. This linguistic variation demonstrates education has traditionally been

perceived more narrowly through an academic lens overseas, with supplementary activities

treated as additions rather than equal companions to classroom lessons. However, in India

cultural traditions uphold a holistic vision of education encompassing well-rounded societal

development beyond just exams. According to OECD (2016, p12), this progressive outlook is

mirrored in the Indian approach which views co-curricular involvement as interwoven with

scholastic learning, rather than separated from it. The contrasting terminology therefore stems

from dissimilar heritage views on the proper scope and balanced shaping of a child's

education experience and preparedness for life.

Moreover, while both countries grapple with ensuring equitable accessibility to

supplemental learning opportunities, the specific obstacles faced differ according to social

and infrastructural environments. In England, socioeconomic barriers like fees for certain

activities and rural isolation limiting transportation availability curb participation

Page 14 of 18
disproportionately for students from lower-income or remote backgrounds (Bloom, 1985,

p.3). Meanwhile in India, entrenched gender prejudices discouraging females in some fields

and uneven resource allocation between urban and rural schools create participation gaps.

Both nations have progressively introduced measures to counter such inequities hampering

educational benefits. England offers needs-based bursaries for example, while India promotes

gender sensitivity training. However, fully overcoming engrained disadvantages rooted in

socio-cultural traditions or lack of infrastructure proves an ongoing challenge. Recognising

different constraints limiting access across dissimilar contexts, both education systems strive

to design and implement targeted policy solutions promoting more inclusive opportunities for

all pupils.

Conclusion and Recommendations

In conclusion, while India and England share the goal of enhancing secondary

education through co-curricular and extracurricular programs respectively, differing cultural

traditions have led to divergent perceptions of impact. Generally, the key similarities lie in

nationwide provision of multi-domain options and recognition of holistic benefits. However,

priorities have moulded India's unified cultural focus versus England's specialised individual

pursuits. Measurement also varies due to dissimilar views of education and success. Both

contexts face participation barriers stemming from socioeconomic disparities and isolated

geographical constraints. Overcoming deep-rooted inequities presents an ongoing task.

Monitoring engagement quality poses challenges without centralized frameworks. Some of

the potential recommendations include

i. Establish national participation tracking for evidence-based reviews

ii. Strengthen rural/peripheral access through low-cost neighbourhood programming

iii. Foster cross-cultural exchange enriching shared and unique strengths

iv. Counter gender socialization influencing subject preferences from an early stage

Page 15 of 18
 References

Annu, S. and Sunita, M., 2015. Extracurricular activities and student’s performance in

secondary school of government and private schools. International Journal of

Sociology and Anthropology Research, 1(1), pp.53-61.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Annu-Singh-13/publication/330533880_EXTRA

CURRICULAR_ACTIVITIES_AND_STUDENT'S_PERFORMANCE_IN_SECON

DARY_SCHOOL_OF_GOVERNMENT_AND_PRIVATE_SCHOOLS/links/

618953c007be5f31b75902b7/EXTRACURRICULAR-ACTIVITIES-AND-

STUDENTS-PERFORMANCE-IN-SECONDARY-SCHOOL-OF-GOVERNMENT-

AND-PRIVATE-SCHOOLS.pdf

ASER. 2018. Annual status of education report. http://www.asercentre.org/downloads.php?

download=true&level=1&mailing=0&pkey=4zOGVBzTsgE%3D

Awartani, M., Whitman, C. V., & Gordon, J. 2019. Developing young people's well-being

through extra-curricular activities. British Educational Research Journal, 45(5), 863-

880. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3522

Fredricks, J. A. 2012. Extracurricular participation and academic outcomes: Testing the over-

scheduling hypothesis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 295-306.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9704-0

Ghoshal, T., 2016. A Study on Co-Curricular Activities at Secondary Level. International

Journal in Management & Social Science, 4(9), pp.46-54.

https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?

target=ijor:ijmss&volume=4&issue=9&article=006

Kolb, D. A.1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and

development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Page 16 of 18
Gardner, H. 1983. Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY:

Basic Books.

Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New

York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and

organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Indian Policy Foundation. 2016. Role of co-curricular activities in Indian education system.

https://www.indianpf.org/post/role-of-co-curricular-activities-in-indian-education-

system

Ofsted. (2015). Unseen children: Access and achievement 20 years on.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/unseen-children-access-and-

achievement-20-years-on

OECD. 2016. PISA 2015 results: Students’ well-being. Volume III.

https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-volume-iii-9789264273856-en.htm

Singh, A., 2017. Effect of co-curricular activities on academic achievement of students. IRA

International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(3), pp.241-254.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ananya-Singh-18/publication/315999019_Effect

_of_Co-Curricular_Activities_on_Academic_Achievement_of_Students/links/

5e81bfcb458515efa0b8b79d/Effect-of-Co-Curricular-Activities-on-Academic-

Achievement-of-Students.pdf

Syed, M.A. and Akram, U., 2023. Role of Co-Curricular Activities in Students’ Behavior

Formation at Secondary School Level: Role of Co-Curricular Activities in Students’

Behavior Formation. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Education, 1(1).

https://ijete.org.pk/index.php/ijete/article/view/3

Page 17 of 18
Teimoornia, M., Emamjomeh, S.M.R., Ahmadi, G.A. and Nasri, S., 2021. A Comparative

Study of the Features of Extracurricular Activities in Iran with England, India and

Malaysia. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 4(2), pp.1138-1158.

Page 18 of 18