Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Special Penal Law
Special Penal Law
Special Penal Law
LAWS
Criminal Law
III. SPECIAL PENAL LAWS NEW ANTI-CARNAPPING ACT OF 2016
I. Elements
TOPIC OUTLINE UNDER THE SYLLABUS: Elements of carnapping
1. Taking, with intent to gain;
III. SPECIAL PENAL LAWS 2. A motor vehicle belonging to another;
A. NEW ANTI-CARNAPPING ACT OF 2016 3. Without the latter’s consent;
(RA 10883) 4. By means of violence against or intimidation
1. Elements of persons; or by using force upon things.
(Sec. 3)
2. Punishable acts; Penalty
Definition of motor vehicle
3. Aggravating circumstances resulting It refers to any vehicle propelled by any power
todenial of bail other than muscular power using the public
highways, EXCEPT for the following:
4. Other relevant rules 1. road rollers, trolley cars, street sweepers,
A. sprinklers, lawn mowers, bulldozers,graders,
forklifts, amphibian trucks, and cranes if not
used on public highways;
2. vehicles which run only on rails or tracks;
and,
3. tractors, trailers and traction engines of all
kinds used exclusively for agricultural
purposes.
e. The presence in any part of the building or a. the immediate disconnection by the electric
its premises which is subject to the control utility to such person after due notice;
ofthe consumer or on the electric meter, of
a current reversing transformer, jumper, b. the holding of a preliminary investigation by
shorting and/or shunting wire, and/or loop the prosecutor and the subsequent filing in
connection or any other similar device; court of the pertinent information; and
We hold the view, however, that the inclusion of a. The private electric utility or rural electric
the phrase ‘by the consumer concerned’ in cooperative concerned shall have the right
the IRR is invalid because it is in excess of what and authority to disconnect immediately
the law being implemented provides. the electric service after serving a written
As RA 7832 stands, only the presence of an notice or warning to that effect, without the
authorized government agent, either an officer need of a court or administrative order, and
ofthe law or an authorized representative of the deny restoration of the same, when the
ERB, during the MERALCO inspection would owner of the house or establishment
allow any of the circumstances enumerated in concerned or someone acting in his behalf
Section 4 of RA 7832 to be considered prima shall have been caught en flagrante delicto
facie evidence of illegal use of electricity by the doing any of the acts enumerated in Section
benefited party. The law does not include the 4(a) hereof, or when any of the
consumer or the consumer's representative in circumstances so enumerated shall have
this enumeration. (Manila Electric Co. v. Spouses been discovered for the second time.
Chua, G.R. No. 160422, 2010)
1. Punishable acts (Sec. 17, RA 10654) c. Failure to secure fishing permit prior to
engaging in distant water fishing
i. To fish in the high seas, in the territorial
seas, archipelagic waters, and
C. FISHERIES CODE (RA 8550, AS
Exclusive Economic Zones of other
AMENDED BY RA 10654)
states using a Philippine flagged
I. Punishable acts fishing vessel without first securing a
fishing permit from the Department
a. Unauthorized fishing
and authorization from the coastal
i. To capture or gather or to cause the
state.
capture or gathering of fish, fry or
The discovery of any person in
fingerlings of any fishery species or
possession of a fishing gear or
fishery products without license or
operating a fishing vessel in the
permitfrom the Department or LGU;
abovementioned areas without a fishing
ii. Any commercial fishing vessel to fish in
permit from the Department or
municipal waters, except in cases
authorization from the coastal state
specified under this Code; and,
shall constitute a prima facie
iii. Any person not listed in the registry of
presumption that the person is in
municipal fisherfolk to engage in any
violation of this provision.
commercial fishing activity in municipal
waters.
ii. An owner or operator, and the three
(3) highest officers, of a commercial
The discovery of any person in possession
fishing vessel to commit acts that
of a fishing gear or operating a fishing
arein contravention of the terms and
vessel in a fishing area where he has no
conditions stated in the fishing
license or permit shall constitute prima
permit or as may be promulgated by
facie presumption that the person is
the Department. (Sec. 88)
engaged in unauthorized fishing:
Provided, That fishing for daily food
d. Unreported fishing – To engage in
sustenance or for leisure which is not for
unreported fishing or to fail to comply with
commercial, occupation or livelihood
the reportorial requirements in Section 38
purposes may be allowed. (Sec. 86)
ofthis Code. (Sec. 89)
e. Unregulated fishing – To engage in
b. Engaging in unauthorized fisheries activities
unregulated fishing in waters within and
– To exploit, occupy, produce, breed or
beyond national jurisdiction. (Sec. 90)
culture fish, fry or fingerlings of any
f. Poaching in Philippine Waters - Any foreign
fishery species or fishery products or
person, corporation or entity to fish or
construct and operate fish corrals, fish
operate any fishing vessel in Philippine
traps, fish pens and fish cages or
waters.
fishponds without a license, lease or
permit.
The entry of any foreign fishing vessel in
Philippine waters shall constitute a prima facie
The following are possible defenses against Distinguishing estafa through issuance of a
liability under BP 22: check under the RPC and BP 22
a. The check was issued as payment of a ESTAFA THROUGH
warranty deposit paid by an ISSUANCE OF A
BP 22
accommodating party (respondent/private CHECK UNDER THE
complainant) as required under the lease- RPC
purchase agreement. Unknown to the The check is issued
The check can be
petitioner, the Vice President of the concurrently and
issued even in
company that distributed the equipment to reciprocally in
payment for a pre-
be bought. The lease-purchase agreement payment, never for a
existing obligation.
did not ripen intoa purchase but remained a pre-existing obligation.
lease with rentals. To charge the accused for Damage and deceit
Damage and deceit
the refund of a "warranty deposit" which he are elements of the
are immaterial.
did not withdraw as it was not his own crime.
account, it having remained with LS Finance, Crime against public
is to evenmake him pay an unjust "debt", to interest (Causes
Crime against
say the least, since petitioner (accused) did prejudice to the
property
not receive the amount in question. (Magno economy and banking
v. CA, G.R. No. 96132, 1992) system)
b. The required notice of dishonor has not been BOTH DRAWER AND ONLY THE DRAWER
given. The drawer should be given a notice INDORSER are liable. is liable.
of dishonor to give him the opportunity to Drawer has 3 days Drawer has 5 days
make good the value of the check within 5 from notice of from notice of
banking days. dishonor to make dishonorto make good
c. The dishonor of the check was not due to good the check the check
insufficiency of funds. If the reason for Malum in se Malum prohibitum
dishonor is other than insufficiency of
funds,such as failure of consideration, BP 22
is notviolated.
d.
b. Overseas Filipinos
3. Prohibited acts (Sec. 5, RA 10022)
It refers to dependents of migrant workers and
4. Penalties (Sec. 6, RA 10022) other Filipino nationals abroad who are in
distress. (Sec. 3, RA 8042)
5. Prescription (Sec. 12, RA 8042)
c. Illegal recruitment
6. Other relevant rules
It refers to any act of canvassing, enlisting,
contracting, transporting, utilizing, hiring, or
procuring workers and includes referring, contract
services, promising or advertising for
employment abroad, whether for profit or not,
when undertaken by a non-licensee or non-
holder of authority contemplated under Article
13(f) of Presidential Decree No. 442, as
amended, otherwise known as the Labor Code of
the Philippines.
h.
5. Registered firearms in the possession of an The penalty of prision mayor in its minimum to
individual other than the licensee; and prision mayor in its medium period shall be
imposed upon the owner, president, manager,
6. Those with revoked licenses.
director or other responsible officer of any
Considered an aggravating circumstance juridical entity who shall willfully or knowingly
allow any of the firearms owned by such to be
The use of a loose firearm, when inherent in the used by any person or persons found guilty of
commission of a crime punishable under the violating the provisions of the preceding
Revised Penal Code or other special laws, shall section, or willfully or knowingly allow any of
be considered as an aggravating circumstance. them to use unregistered firearms without any
legal authority to be carried outside of their
If penalty for crime charged is lower than the residence in the course of their employment.
penalty for illegal possession of firearms
c. Other prohibited acts
If the crime committed with the use of a loose
firearm is penalized by the law with a maximum 1. Unlawful manufacture, importation, sale or
penalty which is lower than the penalty imposed disposition of a firearm or ammunition, or a
for illegal possession of firearms, the penalty for major part thereof, or machinery, tool or
illegal possession of firearm shall be imposedin instrument used or intended to be used by
lieu of the penalty for the crime charged. the same person in the manufacture of a
firearm, ammunition, or a major part thereof
If penalty for crime charged is equal to the (Sec. 32);
penalty for illegal possession of firearms
Organization
a. Accused was not present during the l. No photographs of the seized items were
photography of the seized items (People v. taken (People v. Mercader, G.R. No. 233480,
Cordova, 231130, 2018) 2018)
b. A representative of either the National Links that the prosecution must endeavor to
Prosecution Service or the media was establish with respect to the chain of custodyin
absent during the photography and a buy-bust operation
inventory of the seized items (People v.
Cordova, G.R. No. 231130, 2018) The following links must be established:
c. Three days had passed since the items were a. Seizure and marking of the illegal drug
seized from the accused (People v. Cordova, recovered from the accused by the
G.R. No. 231130, 2018) apprehending officer;
d. Two separate inventories were conducted b. Turnover of the illegal drug seized by the
which were attended by different witnesses apprehending officer to the investigating
(People v. Cabrellos, G.R. No. 229826, 2018) officer;
e. The drugs were turned over to the crime c. Turn over by the investigating officer of the
laboratory 10 days after seizure (People v. illegal drug to the forensic chemist for
Ching, G.R. No. 223556, 2017) laboratory examination; and,
f. The drugs were turned over immediately to d. Turnover and submission of the marked
the crime laboratory, without it being first illegal drug seized by the forensic
delivered to an investigating officer (People chemist to the court. (People v.
v. Calibod, G.R. No. 230230, 2017) Watamama, G.R. No. 18871, 2014)
g. The drugs were not directly turned over to IV. Plea bargaining
the forensic chemist. Instead, it was only
While Section 23 of the Dangerous Drugs Act
left within the premises of the crime
provides that “any person charged under any
laboratory (People v. Calibod, G.R. No.
provision of this Act regardless of the imposable
230230, 2017)
penalty shall not be allowed to avail of the
h. There were discrepancies in the labels of the provision on plea-bargaining,” this provision has
seized items (People v. Alvaro, G.R. No. been stricken down as unconstitutional in
225596, 2018) Estipona v. Hon. Lobrigo (G.R. 226679, 2017) for
being contrary to the rule-making authority of the
i.
Public Officials
It includes elective and appointive officials and
employees, permanent or temporary, whether in
the career or non-career service, including
military and police personnel, whether or not they
receive compensation, regardless of amount.
Gift
It refers to a thing or a right to dispose of
gratuitously, or any act or liberality, in favor of
another who accepts it, and shall include a
simulated sale or an ostensibly onerous
disposition thereof. It shall not include an
unsolicited gift of nominal or insignificant value
not given in anticipation of, or in exchange for, a
favor from a public official or employee.
Loan
It covers both simple loan and commodatum as
well as guarantees, financing arrangements or
accommodations intended to ensure its approval.
Substantial stockholder
It means any person who owns, directly or
indirectly, shares of stock sufficient to elect a
director of a corporation. This term shall also
apply to the parties to a voting trust.
Person
It includes natural and juridical persons,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
Conflict of interest
It arises when a public official or employee
is a member of a board, an officer, or a
substantial stockholder of a private
corporation or owner or has a substantial
interest in a business, and the interest of
such corporation or business, or his rights
or duties therein, may be opposed to or
affected by the faithful performance of
officialduty.
Divestment
It is the transfer of title or disposal of
interest in property by voluntarily,
completely and actually depriving or
dispossessing oneself of his right or title
to it in favor of a person or persons other
thanhis spouse and relatives as defined in
this Act.
Relatives
It refers to any and all persons related to a
publicofficial or employee within the fourth
civil degree of consanguinity or affinity,
including bilas, inso and balae. (Sec. 3)
a. Any and all statements filed under this Act, VII. Other relevant rules
shall be made available for inspection at To warrant dismissal from the service, the
reasonable hours. misconduct must be grave, serious, important,
b. Such statements shall be made available for weighty, momentous, and not trifling. The
copying or reproduction after ten (10) misconduct must imply wrongful intention and
working days from the time they are filed as not a mere error of judgment. Corruption as an
required by law. element of grave misconduct consists in the act
c. Any person requesting a copy of a statement of an official or employee who unlawfully or
shall be required to pay a reasonable fee to wrongfully uses her station or character to
cover the cost of reproduction and mailing procure some benefit for herself or for another,
of such statement, as well as the cost of at the expense of the rights of others.
certification. Nonetheless, "a person charged with grave
d. Any statement filed under this Act shall be misconduct may be held liable for simple
available to the public for a period of ten (10) misconduct if the misconduct does not involve
years after receipt of the statement. After any of the additional elements to qualify the
such period, the statement may be misconduct as grave. Grave misconduct
destroyed unless needed in an ongoing necessarily includes the lesseroffense of simple
investigation. misconduct." (GSIS v. Mayordomo, G.R. No.
191218, 2011)
d. Prohibited acts
It shall be unlawful for any person to obtain or use A gift is covered by the prohibition, so long as it
any statement filed under this Act for: has more than nominal monetary value. It is not
necessary for the solicitation to be for a fund-
a. any purpose contrary to morals or public
raising project. The mere fact that the gift
policy; or
received was unsolicited cannot, by itself,
b. suffice to exonerate the recipient. It would only
suffice to exonerate the recipient if the
unsolicited gift is
Page 286 of 354
also nominal in value and not given in anticipation on criminal complaints against public officials
of, or in exchange for, a favor. In such a situation, and government employees. The rule on non-
the gift would fall outside the purview of RA 6713, interference is based on the "respect for the
which expressly provides that the term "gift" does investigatory and prosecutory powers granted by
"not include an unsolicited gift of nominal or the Constitution to the Office of the Ombudsman.
insignificant value[;] not given in anticipation of, or As an independent constitutional body, it has the
in exchange for, a favor from a public official or sole power to determine whether there is
employee. (Mabini v. Raga, A.M. No. P-06-2150, probably cause to warrant the filing of a criminal
2006) case against an accused; this function is
executive in nature. Further, the public prosecutor
Cases is not bound by the technical rules on evidence.
Dichaves v. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. The executive finding of probable cause requires
206310-11, 2016 only substantial evidence, not absolute certainty
On August 26, 1999, a person opened a Savings of guilt. As the Office of the Ombudsman's
Account with the Equitable Banking Corporation conclusion is based on a belief or an opinion, the
and Equitable-PCI Bank, under a fictitious name technical rules on evidence cannot be made to
“Jose Velarde”. Aside from these, a Current apply to it. This Court finds no reason to violate
Account and Investment Management Trust the policy of non-interference in the exercise of
Account were opened as well. On February 4, the Ombudsman's constitutionally mandated
2000, a P500 million was withdrawn from the powers. The Ombudsman's ruling must be
Savings Account by former President X. Y claims respected.
ownership of the said accounts, asserting that he
used the alias “Jose Velarde” for security Office of the Ombudsman v. Regalado, G.R.
purposes. In the first complaint, Y was accused of 208481-82, 2018
direct bribery, indirect bribery, corruption of public Respondent X is an immigration officer in the
officials, and violations of PD 46. In another Davao Office of the Bureau of Immigration
complaint, Y is accused of violating RA 6713, RA wherein complainant Y was requesting for an
3019 or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, accreditation for admission of foreign student’s
and plunder under RA 8080. On September 12, in her preparatory school. X claims that a
2007, X was found guilty beyond reasonable processing fee of Php 50,000 was necessary plus
doubt of the crime of plunder. The honorariums for the accreditors since they will
Sandiganbayan ruled that X was the real and come from outside Mindanao. X was then found
beneficial owner of the "Jose Velarde" account. guilty by the lower courts for violating Section 7(d)
The Ombudsman commenced the preliminary of R.A. 6713 (CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICAL
investigation in 2011, and found probable cause STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC
to charge him with plunder in 2012. Y was OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES) for solicitations of
indicted for conspiring with the former President any gift, gratuity, loan or anything of monetary
in amassing ill-gotten wealth. Did the Office of the value since it was discovered that the actual
Ombudsman gravely abuse its discretion in processing fee was only Php 10,000 pesos no
finding probably cause against X to charge him of more no less. The excess amount being asked for
plunder, by incorrectly considering pieces of was admittedly for red tape or bribe purposes.
evidence allegedly not presented during the The court of appeals however, instead of
preliminary investigation? dismissing her from service, applied a mitigating
circumstances of her “good work performance”
No. As a general rule, this Court does not interfere and being a first time offender which they
with the Office of the Ombudsman's exercise of rendered a judgment of only 1 year suspension
its constitutional mandate. Both the Constitution without pay. Is X guilty for violating Article 7(d)
and Republic Act No. 6770 (The Ombudsman Act of
of 1989) give the Ombudsman wide latitude to act R.A. 6713 and is it possible to lower the penalty
through a mitigating circumstance?
a. In the office of the corresponding The prosecution of any offense or violation under
Department Head, or the AMLA shall proceed independently of any
proceeding relating to the unlawful activity.
b. in the case of a Head of Department or chief
(Section 6 (b), R.A. No. 10365 amending RA
of an independent office, with the Office of
9160, as amended).
the President, or
————- end of topic ————-
c. In the case of members of the Congress and
the officials and employees thereof, with
TOPIC OUTLINE UNDER THE SYLLABUS:
the Office of the Secretary of the
correspondingHouse (Sec. 7)
III. SPECIAL PENAL LAWS
V. Dismissal due to unexplained wealth
N. ANTI-PLUNDER ACT (RA 7080, AS
The following are prima facie evidence of and AMENDED BY RA 7659)
grounds for dismissal due to unexplained wealth
if any public official is found: 1. Definition of terms
Competent court
Sandiganbayan
Pre-suspension hearing
Accessory to terrorism
S. TERRORISM FINANCING
PREVENTIONAND SUPPRESSION ACT OF
2012 (RA 10168)
Child pornography
It refers any representation of a child engaged or
involved in real or simulated explicit sexual
activities.
iii. The use, procuring or offering of a child b. Executing, for a consideration, an affidavit of
for the production and trafficking of drugs; consent or a written consent for adoption;
and
c. Recruiting a woman to bear a child for the
iv. The use, procuring or offering of a child purpose of selling the child;
for illegal activities or work which, by its
nature or the circumstances in which it d. Simulating a birth for the purpose of selling
is carried out, is likely to harm their the child; and
health, safety or morals; and
e. Soliciting a child and acquiring the custody
l. To organize or direct other persons to thereof through any means from among
commit the offenses defined as acts of hospitals, clinics, nurseries, daycarecenters,
trafficking under this Act. (Sec. 4) refugee or evacuation centers, and low-
income families, for the purpose of selling
Penalty the child. (Sec. 4-A)
Penalty
Case
Other acts of neglect, abuse, cruelty or People v. Udang, Sr. y Sevilla, G.R. No. 210161,
exploitation and other conditions prejudicial to 2018
the child's development
X was charged with two counts of rape against Y,
a. Any person who shall commit any other acts who at the time was a minor, in Violation of Article
of child abuse, cruelty or exploitation or to be 266-A in relation to Sec. 5 (b) of R.A. 7610. X
responsible for other conditions prejudicial raped 13-year-old Y in his house while Y was
to the child's development including those intoxicated, once in Sept 2003 and again on
covered by Article 59 of Presidential Decree December 2003. The RTC and CA convicted X of
No. 603, as amended, but not covered by the rape under Article 266-A(1) of the Revised Penal
Revised Penal Code, as amended Code, instead of sexual abuse under Section 5(b)
of Republic Act No. 7610. It ratiocinated that
b. Any person who shall keep or have in his while the allegations in the first and second
company a minor, twelve (12) years or under Informations satisfied the elements of rape
or who in ten (10) years or more his junior in underthe first and third paragraphs of Article 266
any public or private place, hotel, motel, beer -A, respectively, the charges can only be one (1)
joint, discotheque, cabaret, pension house, for rape under the first paragraph of Article 266-
sauna or massage parlor, beach and/or A because an accused cannot be prosecuted
other tourist resort or similar places. twice for a single criminal act. Was X correctly
This provision shall not apply to any person who convicted of rape punished under the first
is related within the fourth degree of paragraph of Article 266-A of the Revised Penal
consanguinity or affinity or any bond Code?
recognized by law, local custom and tradition
or acts in the performance of a social, No, X was charged and convicted for
moralor legal duty. violation of Section 5 (b), Article III of RA
7610, not rape. The offense for which he
c. Any person who shall induce, deliver or offer was convicted is punished by a special
a minor to any one prohibited by this Act to law while rape is a felony under the
keep or have in his company a minor as Revised Penal Code. They have different
provided in the preceding paragraph. elements. The two are separate and
d. Any person, owner, manager or one distinct crimes. Thus, X can be held liable
entrusted with the operation of any public for violation of Section 5 (b), Article III of
orprivate place of accommodation, whether RA 7610 despite a finding that he did not
for occupancy, food, drink or otherwise, commit rape. Unlike rape, consent is
including residential places, who allows any immaterial in cases involving violation of
person to take along with him to such place Section 5, Article III of RA 7610.
or places any minor herein described.
e. Any person who shall use, coerce, force or
intimidate a street child or any other child to;
1.
Page 344 of 354
Perez v. People, G.R. No. 201414, 2018
Age of Victim
Under 12 years old or 12 years old or below 18, or 18 years old
Crime Committed demented 18 under special and above
circumstances
Rape under Article 266-A Rape under Article 266-A (1) in Rape under
(1) in relation to Art. 266-B relation to Art. 266-B of the Article 266-A
of the RPC: reclusion RPC: reclusion perpetua (1) of the
Rape by carnal
perpetua, except when RPC: reclusion
knowledge
the victim is below 7 years perpetua
old in which case death
penalty shall be imposed
Employer
A person who exercises control over an employee
Gender
It is a set of socially ascribed characteristics,
norms, roles, attitudes, values and expectations
identifying the social behavior of men and
women, and the relations between them;
II. Gender-based streets and public spaces III. Gender-based online sexual harassment
sexual harassment
Acts that use information and communications
The following acts are unlawful and shall be technology in terrorizing and intimidating victims
penalized as follows: through the following:
a. For acts such as cursing, wolf-whistling, a. physical, psychological, and emotional
catcalling, leering and intrusive gazing, threats, unwanted sexual misogynistic,
taunting, pursing, unwanted invitations, transphobic, homophobic and sexist
misogynistic, transphobic, homophobic, and remarks and comments online whether
sexist slurs, persistent unwanted publicly or through direct and private
comments on one’s appearance, relentless messages,
requests for one’s personal details such as b. invasion of victim’s privacy through
name, contact and social media details or cyberstalking and incessant messaging;
destination, the use of words, gestures or c. uploading and sharing without the consent of
actions that ridicule on the basis of sex, the victim, any form of media that contains
gender or sexual orientation, identity and/or photos, voice, or video with sexual content,
expression including sexist, homophobic, any unauthorized recording and sharing of
and transphobic statements and slurs, the any of the victim’s photos, videos, or any
persistent telling of sexual jokes, use of information online; or,
sexual names, comments and demands, d. impersonating identities of victims online or
and any statement that has made an posting lies about victims to harm their
invasion on a person’s personal space or reputation, or filing, false abuse reports to
threatens the person’s sense of personal online platforms to silence victims.
safety;
b.
g. Granted with conditional pardon by the The Board may limit his residence and change it
President, but violated the terms thereof; from time to time.
h. Maximum term of imprisonment actually The final certificate of release shall issue ONLYif
imposed does not exceed one (1) year; during the period of surveillance, the paroled
i. When penalty is other than prison sentence prisoner successfully satisfies items (b) and (c)
(e.g., destierro or suspension only) ofhis duties above-mentioned.
6. Arrest of probationer
7. Termination of probation
b. Report to his probation officer at least once i. If placing the offender on probation will
a month at such time and place as NOT serve the end of justice or the best
specifiedby said officer; and, interest of the society and the offender
himself;
c. Other additional conditions that the court
may require as listed in Section 10 of PD j. Those guilty of malicious reporting of
968. money laundering under RA 9160, as
amended; and,
Grounds for denial of application for
probation k. In order not to depreciate the crime of
torture(RA 9745).
Application for probation shall be denied upon the
finding of the court that: V. Period of probation
a. Probation will depreciate the seriousness of Period of imprisonment and period of probation
the offense committed; TERM OF
DURATION
IMPRISONMENT
b. There is undue risk of committing another Penalty for crime is not Probation shall not
crime during the probation period; or more than 1 year exceed 2 years
Penalty for crime is Probation shall not
c. The offender is in need of correctional more than 1 year exceed 6 years
treatment that can be provided effectively When penalty is a fine Probation shall be
byhis commitment to an institution. only and offender is twice the total
made to serve number of days of
IV. Disqualified offenders
subsidiary subsidiary
The benefits of the Probation Law shall not be imprisonment imprisonment
extended to the following persons:
TOPIC OUTLINE UNDER THE SYLLABUS: a. being abused by any person through sexual,
physical, psychological, mental, economic or
III. SPECIAL PENAL LAWS any other means and the parents or
guardian refuse, are unwilling, or unable to
Note: This topic is included in the List of provide protection for the child;
Relevant Materials for Special Penal Laws, but
not expressly included under the syllabus for b. being exploited including sexually or
the said subject. economically;
FF. JUVENILE JUSTICE AND WELFARE ACT(RA c. being abandoned or neglected, and after
9344, AS AMENDED BY RA 10630) diligent search and inquiry, the parent or
guardian cannot be found;
1. Definition of terms (Sec. 4)
d. coming from a dysfunctional or broken
2. Rights of the child in conflict with the familyor without a parent or guardian;
law(Sec. 5)
3. Minimum age of criminal e. being out of school;
responsibility(Sec. 6)
f. being a streetchild;
4. Prohibited acts (Secs. 60 and 61)
5.
Bahay Pag-asa
Multi-disciplinary team
Diversion
Intervention
Recognizance
Restorative justice
Status offenses
Factors in determining the diversion program Persons below eighteen (18) years of age shall
be exempt from prosecution for the following
In determining whether diversion is appropriate crimes:
and desirable, the following factors shall be taken
into consideration: a. Vagrancy and prostitution under Section 202
of the Revised Penal Code;
a. The nature and circumstances of the
offensecharged; b. Mendicancy under Presidential Decree No.
1563; and
b. The frequency and the severity of the act;
c. Sniffing of rugby under Presidential Decree
c. The circumstances of the child (e.g. age, No. 1619. (Sec. 58)
maturity, intelligence, etc.);
Exemption from the application of death
d. The influence of the family and penalty
environmenton the growth of the child;
The provisions of the Revised Penal Code, as
e. The reparation of injury to the victim; amended, Republic Act No. 9165, otherwise
known as the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs
f. The weight of the evidence against the child; Act of 2002, and other special laws
notwithstanding, no death penalty shall be
g. The safety of the community; and,
imposed upon children in conflict with the law.
h. The best interest of the child (Sec. 29)
Exploitation of children for commission of
crimes