title TL;DR ResultsMethods Used Limitations ModelsFactors Used impactFutures model works weakness Frameworks Used

- Challenges - Challenges
include organizational
- Literature
include recruiter
- search
Recruiters
difficulties,
conducted
equipoise,
- often
Strategies
lackstruggle
of
patient
using
time,
- include
Effective
Medline,
with
preferences,
andtelephone
patient
uncertainty
strategies
- Research
Embase,factors.
and
reminders,
include
-could
and
between
lack
Difficulty
CINAHL
of
explore
telephone
time.
financial
trial
-inQuinteT
databases.
maintaining
specific
arms. reminders,
incentives,
Recruitment
communication
equipoise
financial
and Interv
open-
and in
t
Understand-- Interventions
-
Validation- of Studies
like
Thethe QuinteT
explore
model -
model Studies
- aims Recruitment
recruitment
with
-
Problem-oriented
andtotemplateLack
qualitative
standardizeof
- Template issues
help
time -
is essential
conceptualIn-depth
address
for
methods
enterprisein
-validation single
research
Problem-oriented interviews,
-
formodel recruitment
Need
RCTs
focusing
activities
recruitment
future
-needed for
or
Recruitment across
more
developed-audio
on
Investigate
obstacles
improvements.
for
conceptualis
recruitment
a
robust
- updates
Future multiple
recordings,
forsystemcommon
optimal
to work- in
Patients'
address
and
modelstrategies
designs
real-time.
trials.
activity
- components,barrier.
Complexity
results.
new data
focuses
for to
strong
-
recruitmentTraining
elements.to
analysis,
support
of
enterprise
- on improve
clinicians
treatment
Enterprise programs
recruiters
and
ofarchitectural
implementing
ERAsystem recruiter-patien
elements included.
rapid
recruitment preferences
recruitment were
effective
reportin
elements.
elements,
enterprise
andarchite cre
relati
arch a
Top Main r-- Addresses
Focused on --stakeholders'
Future
Developed
definingwork
-recruitment
-Validation
afocuses
interests
Design --on
of
Inability
and
problem-oriented
science implementing
theresearch
concerns
model
Difficulty
problems to--inconceptual
Enterprise
comprehensively
POCM through
inenterprise
isbuilding
comprehensively
representing
approach --Applicant
recruitment
case
abstract recruitment
External
model
with
andstudies
recruitment
address
and
for
and
five--perspectives,
Validation
template
in be
understanding
factors
better
can
Futurethe
ERA
ontology
defined systems.
likepatterns
recruitment
complexity
-social,
of
The
forjob
understanding.
instantiated
works the
activities.
for recruitment
characteristics,
and
template
real-world --in
e-recruitment.
may economic,domain.
validating
Recruitment
include
at oneSystems
Soft is
methodology
system
model.
different needed
recruitment them.
organizational
expanding
political, patterns
components
levels. to improve
incorpo
Methodology
problem.
and
research
legalwith in
con
on m
da
Problem Or-- Literature -- review
Aims to enhance Comprehensive
Developedguided
--Analysis
understandinginvestigation
Design coverage
Ontology of--for
Difficulty
scienceempirical
and of of
Zachman'sknowledge
research
Recruitment
analysis
research -in-data
Shared
transforming
from gaps
and
in-three
Problem-Oriented
framework
ofmethod.
recruitment
Problem -the
Problem
sector-independent
inrecruitment
problem
recruitment
real
Recruitment
lacks
Definitionrepresentation
-recruitment
problems-Further
step-by-stepdomain
Conceptual
Future problem
domain.
partner
(Onto-RPD) -knowledge
studiesThe
POCM
case
systematically.
works
process
Model rese
approaches
domain.
could
studies.
decisions, and
include
for
(POCM)
for -- enterprise
Enterprise
focus
into
Onto-RPD
e-recruitment include
external
Ontologye-recruitment
refining onfactors,
enhancing
the
forArchitecture
artefacts.
goal modeling
engineering.
solutions.
POCM
Recruitment
and specifica
recruitm
and (EA
proble
Ont Pa
preprints2 -- Focuses on--Evaluated
Recommendations closing the
Actionable - POCM
Action-Research
gap between
encourage and - Framework
recommendationsOnto-RPD
recruitment
stakeholders Method -- in
for Ontology
isclinical
Tools
to focus
aactively
for
structure,
preferences
for spiral
group
--for
trial Comprehensive
decision Recruitment
process.
study
not
Recruitment
seek and
a--with
recruitment
solutionstransformation
making,Potential
reality.
positive
Problem
Researchevaluation
communication
planning
for
monitoring-- Lack
future
recruitment
could of
outcomes.
Definition
process.
research
confirms
Recruitment
were
explore -challenges.
-Checkland's
recruitment,
planning (Onto-RPD)
developed.
CTTI areas
completeness
patient
challenges involve
Framework
andand Soft
engagement
stakeholder
qualitySystems
enhancing
persist ofimprove
for thein PO
Strateg
despit
engaM
cli
Clinical tr - Limited data- Tools - Literatu
on overcoming
to facilitate --Challenges
No singlebarriers
recruitment
collaborations --Recommendations
were
Various provided.
and
with documentation --successful
Participant
modelling for
--strategies.
Threats techniques
to Further
contact,
efficient
access
Apply
job vacancystudies
ERBP
and convenience,
--clinical
Trials
based may
often
Difficulty, trial
confidentiality
in
filling,
various
on -investigate
uses Framework
recruitment
fail
incentives,
undesired
-time, to
Zachman reach
recruitment
and in
money strategies
developed
and
planning.
recruitment
capabilities.
military
outcomes,
Framework
demands human
contexts
research. for
stakehobyred
for
into fac
go
C
app
va
be
1. Main re -- Paper
Evaluate -
presents Evaluati
- POCM POCM - Inductiv
and Onto-RPD
and Onto-RPD- Time-consuming
- Difficulty
valuable -
for enterprise
-in No
inOntologysingle
permissions
understanding - existing
scopinge-recruitment Problem
for
recruitment
- Recruitment modelling
and
Recruitment conceptual
- Design
recruitment restrictions
- Ensure
problem,
problem
actors'technique
a
Problem methodology
-models,
Lack
artefacts
problem on of
perceptionsresearch
representing
analysis. captures
institutional
problem
Definition -
complexity.Design
are precise,using
- Soft documentation
all
analysis
ERM
science
aspects
ofreal-world
(Onto-RPD) commitment
recruitware,
Systems
abstractfor techniques,
framework
defining
of complex
recruitment
Methodologyin
granular,
informationmilita
and
and
pr
antf
1. Main re --Aims to inform
Proposes Developed -- Design
--Problem-Oriented
Experts
RE process
agreedDesignon sscience
forConceptual
common
e-recruitment
incrementally --Lack of terms
Difficulty
using step-by-step
research
Model-action-research
-inRynes
solutions
and accurate
andOntology
Problem-Oriented
scoping
approach
and --and
method
Problem
Cable's
systematically.
Goalwithdefinitions
to
model,
context,
--define
representing
on
modeling
three
five
for Define
Conceptual
FutureSaks's
e-recruitment.
defined
real
and case
works-problem.
inreal-world
the
domain, Weakness
comprehensive
the dual-stage
problemmodels.
activities.
Model and
studies.
may (POCM) stakeholder
- Design
recruitment
frames
includemodel,
andare generic
science
Breaugh
refining
key perspectives
problems. requirements
method
and
representation
the POCM Starke
fram
are
and a
1. Main re - Addresses- challenges
Evaluated- in Action-research
inaunderstanding
focus -groupChallenges
study
method
recruitment
- Onto-RPD
in
against
transforming
emphasizing
aproblems
-set
artefacts
Enterprise
of collaboration
criteria.
recruitment
for
for
- Further
Architecture
e-recruitment
enterprise - The
problem
research
between rese
e-recruitment.
addresses
success.
knowledge
could - Goal
researchersfocus modelling,
complexity
into
on
and andproblem
enhancing
e-recruitment
practitioners.
change e-recr fr
so
in
meworks Used
- QuinteT Recruitment Intervention was developed to address recruitment obstacles.
-- Training programs
Enterprise werearchitectures
recruitment created based on qualitative research findings.
(ERAs)
--Recruitment
Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) inspired theand
patterns with defined templates elements framework.
methodological
-- Enterprise
Ontology forArchitecture
Recruitment (EA) reference
Problem frameworks
Definition like Zachman Framework were considered.
(Onto-RPD)
--Checkland's Soft Systems
CTTI Framework Methodology
for Strategic (SSM)
Recruitment Planning delineates trial design, feasibility, communication.
--Framework developed by CTTI focuses on
Zachman Framework for better visualization and trial planning and execution.
understanding of enterprise components.
--Design science framework for structured development of
Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) for problem-oriented worldviews. artifacts.
- Design science method framework for artefact creation.
- Goal modelling, problem frames, and Enterprise Architecture frameworks were utilized.