Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Finance For Business...
Finance For Business...
This study looks at the risks and returns portfolio analysis of four different types of investments over
three years. These investments are the Goodman group (GMG.AX), the Origin Energy Limited
(ORG.AX), the Commonwealth bank (CBA.AX) and the Worly Limited (WOR.AX).
The investment in GMG.AX had small average monthly return of 1.55%, but it was riskier with a
standard deviation of 9.15%. This means there is a balance between money and taking on risks. The
second type of investment, the ORG.AX was more risky than GMG.AX with a standard deviation of
10.10%, but the average monthly return was 2.54%. So, it’s a critical situation to invest in these
stocks.
The third investment, the CBA.AX was less risky than first and second type of investment and much
better in terms of returns with 101.41%. Finally the fourth type, the WOR.AX has same level of risk
and return percentage as CBA.AX. It had an average monthly return of 101.76% and standard
deviation of 6.55%.
In summary, this research shows how important it is to think about risks and returns in investment.
It also highlights the need to choose investments that match the financial goals and how much risk
the investors can handle and also contribute to a better environment.
Introduction:
The risk-return and portfolio evaluation is a fundamental concept of finance, demonstrating a
positive relationship between risk and return. A portfolio composed of all equities presents both
higher risk and higher potential returns. The study covers four indices over a three year period (01-
01-2021 to 31-12-2023): Goodman group (GMG.AX), Origin energy limited (ORG.AX),
Commonwealth bank (CBA.AX), Worly limited (WOR.AX). Calculations include average returns and
standard deviations, variances, geometric means, annual returns, and holding period returns of each
indices to evaluate their historical performance.
In addition, the analysis of historical return relationships and correlations of these indices,
considering equally-weighted portfolios to assess risk-return trade-offs compared with each other
indices or stocks. This report also offers recommendations to investors to choose the best company
which provide profitable returns with manageable risks.
B
i. The monthly returns of the following companies:
Returns%
0.00%
21 21 21 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 22 22 23 23 23 23 23 23
-5.00%eb- pr- un- ug- ct- ec- eb- pr- un- ug- ct- ec- eb- pr- un- ug- ct- ec-
F A J A O D F A J A O D F A J A O D
-10.00%
-15.00%
-20.00%
-25.00%
Months
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3
b-2 r-2 n-2 g-2 ct-2 c-2 b-2 r-2 n-2 g-2 ct-2 c-2 b-2 r-2 n-2 g-2 ct-2 c-2
Fe Ap Ju Au O De Fe Ap Ju Au O De Fe Ap Ju Au O De
Months
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3
b-2 r-2 n-2 g-2 ct-2 c-2 b-2 r-2 n-2 g-2 ct-2 c-2 b-2 r-2 n-2 g-2 ct-2 c-2
Fe Ap Ju Au O De Fe Ap Ju Au O De Fe Ap Ju Au O De
Months
Line Chart of ORG:
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
Nov-23 Dec-23
-2.00%
Returns
-4.00%
-6.00%
-8.00%
-10.00%
-12.00%
Months
III. calculation of geometric mean of the monthly return for each stock:
Geometric mean:
Geometric mean provides the most accurate information to calculate the average growth
rates. It is commonly used to calculate the annual return on a financial portfolio of securities.
The geometric mean of GMG.AX is 1.14% and ORG.AX is 2.08% followed by 101.30% for
CBA.AX and 101.66% for WOR.AX respectively.
Here, the geometric mean of GMG.AX and ORG.AX is relatively low compared to CBA.AX and
WOR.AX.
GMG.ax has the lowest relative return, whereas the ORG.AX has a modest return.
CBA.AX and WOR.AX has the highest relative return compared to GMG.AX and ORG.AX
indicating substantial and consistent growth over the three years.
After reviewing these companies’ returns, the CBA.AX and WOR.AX stocks are profitable and
can give the best returns to investors with moderate risks.
GMG.AX Investment:
= $37,115
ORG.AX Investment:
= $30,786
= 37,115+30,786
= $67,901
VII.
Correlation of GMG and ORG are impossible because values are negative.
CORRELATION
Column 1 Column 2
Column 1 1
Column 2 0.381826 1
This value of correlation shows weak positive correlation between CBA and WOR.
VIII.
Correlation is impossible between GMD and ORG is impossible because some percentages
are negative. We calculate correlation between CBA and WOR the value of correlation is
0.3818. This value shows positive linear relationship between CBA and WOR. The strength
of relationship is positive but weak.
James Chen, Akhilesh Ganti and Patrice Williams, (2024) ‘ Risk-return tradeoff : how the investment
principle works’ p1(1). Available at :
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/riskreturntradeoff.asp#:~:text=At%20the%20portfolio
%20level%2C%20risk,than%2Ddesired%20potential%20for%20returns.