Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CH10
CH10
Concrete
Design
Chapter Ten
Footings
10-1 Introduction 10-6 Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Footings
10-4 Individual Reinforced Concrete Footings for Columns 10-9 Cantilever or Strap Footings
•Because it has bending in only one direction, it is generally designed in much the same manner
as a one-way slab, by considering a typical 12-in.-wide strip along the length of wall.
•A wall footing under concentric load behaves similarly to a cantilever beam, where the cantilever
extends out from the wall and is loaded in an upward direction by the soil pressure.
•From the ACI Code, Section 22.5, the nominal flexural design strength of a plain concrete cross
section is calculated from
• In a reinforced concrete wall footing, the behavior is identical to that just
described.
• For each type of wall, the critical section for shear in the footing may be taken
at a distance from the face of the wall equal to the effective depth of the
footing.
Problems
10-3 Wall Footings Under Light
Loads
•A relatively common situation is one in which a lightly
loaded wall is supported on average soil.
•In such a situation, experience has shown that for footings
carrying plain concrete or block masonry walls, the
minimum recommended dimensions shown in Figure 10-
8 should be used.
•The minimum depth or thickness of footing should be 8
in. but not less than the wall thickness.
•The minimum width of footing should equal twice the wall
thickness.
10-4 Individual Reinforced
Concrete Footings for Columns
•An individual reinforced concrete footing for a column, also termed
an isolated spread footing, is probably the most common, simplest,
and most economical of the various types of footings used for
structures.
•As in a beam or one-way slab, the shear strength provided by the footing concrete may be taken
as
Moment and Development of
Bars
•The size and spacing of the footing reinforcing steel is primarily a
function of the bending moment induced by the net upward soil
pressure.
•The bearing strength of the concrete contact area of supporting and supported member
cannot exceed ø(0.85f′cA1) as directed by the ACI Code, Section 10.14.1.
•Therefore, in no case can the design-bearing strength for the loaded area be in excess of
•Where a reinforced concrete column cannot transfer the load entirely by bearing, the excess load
must be transferred by reinforcement where the required
As = (excess load)/fy.
•To provide a positive connection between a reinforced concrete column
and footing (whether dowels are required or not), the ACI Code, Section
15.8.2.1, requires a minimum area of reinforcement crossing the
bearing surface of 0.005 of the column cross-sectional area.
•Where a column base detail is inadequate to transfer the total load,
adjustments may be made as follows:
1. Increase column base plate dimensions.
2. Use higher-strength concrete (f′c ) for the pedestal or footing.
3. Increase the supporting area with respect to the base plate area until
the ratio reaches the maximum allowed by the ACI Code.
It is also common practice to assume that the minimum tensile reinforcement for beams is
applicable to two-way footings for each of the two directions, unless the reinforcement provided is
one-third greater than required.
As discussed in Section 2-8 (and in the ACI Code, Section 10.5.1), the minimum tensile
reinforcement is determined from
10-6 Rectangular Reinforced
Concrete Footings
Rectangular footings are generally used where space limitations require it.
The design of these footings is very similar to that of the square column footing with the one
major exception that each direction must be investigated independently.
In rectangular footings, the distribution of the reinforcement is different than for square footings
(ACI Code, Section 15.4.4).
The portion of the total required steel that should go into this band is
Problems
Plan View
The footing thickness h was assumed to be
2.5 ft =30 in. Therefore the effective depth,
based on a 3-in. cover for bottom steel and
1-in.-diameter bars in each direction, will be Plan View
Checking the shear strength for two-way action
(with reference to Figure
Plan View
The shear strength of the concrete is taken as the smallest of
(a)
Load for shear one-way action
6’-8”
5-2 Development Length:
Tension Bars review
ld
ld
ld
• Of the two steel areas, the larger (14.07 in.^2) controls; therefore use 4
No. 11 bars (As = 14.00 in.^2). These bars will run in the long direction
and will be distributed uniformly across the 13 ft-8 in. width. They will be
placed in the bottom layer where they will have the advantage of slightly
greater effective depth.
• The development length must be checked for these bars. Assume
uncoated bars. This calculation for ld follows the eight-step procedure
presented in Chapter 5, Section 5-2, and is summarized as follows:
1. KD = 82.2
2. ψt = 1.0, ψe = 1.0, ψs = 1.0, λ = 1.0
3. ψt * ψe = 1.0 (O.K.)
4. cb = 3.5 in.
5. Ktr = 0
6. (cb + Ktr)/db = 3.16 Use 2.5
7. KER = 1.00
8. ld = 37.2 in. > 12 in. (O.K.)
LOOK AT 5-2 Development
Length: Tension Bars
Because the supporting surface is wider on all sides, the bearing strength
for the footing may be computed as follows:
dowels
4 #11 Bars
Design sketch
10-7 Eccentrically Loaded
Footings
•Where footings are subject to eccentric vertical loads or to moments transmitted by the supported
column, the design varies somewhat from that of the preceding sections.
•The soil pressure is no longer uniform across the footing width but may be assumed to vary
linearly.
•The resultant force should be within the middle one-third of the footing base to ensure a positive
contact surface between the footing and the soil.
10-8 Combined Footings
•Combined footings are footings that support more than one column or wall.
•Then, by substitution,
•Note that V acting downward on the strap beam also means that
V is an uplift force on the interior footing. Therefore
•and, by substitution,