Types of Alkanolamines For Acid Gas Treatment 1709355394

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Types of Alkanolamines for Acid Gas Treatment

 By Nasir Hussain
 May 23, 2022
Alkanolamines or amines are chemicals used for the removal of sour gases (H2S/CO2) from the
industrial gas streams. Amines used are basic in nature and react with acid gases to form salts.
This process of treatment of Acid gases with amines is called Amine Scrubbing, Acid Gas
Treatment, Amine Gas Treatment, Gas Sweetening, or Acid Gas removal. Amines have a
functional group that contains nitrogen. Primary amines arise when one of the three hydrogen
atoms in ammonia is replaced with an organic substituent. Secondary amines have two organic
components while tertiary amines have three organic substituents bonded with Nitrogen. The
choice of amine depends on pressure, temperature, gas flow rate, gas composition, and purity
requirements of the treated gas.
Many different amines are used in gas treating, major types are as follows;
 Monoethanolamine (MEA)
 Diethanolamine (DEA)
 Methyldiethanolamine (MDEA)
 Diisopropanolamine (DIPA)
 Aminoethoxyethanol (Diglycolamine) (DGA)
1. Monoethanolamine (MEA)
It is the primary, strongest, and the most basic amine among others. It can almost completely
remove the acid gases from the gas stream. Used in low-pressure natural gas treatment
applications required for stringent product gas specifications. These amines were used
extensively for many years for the treatment of acid gases but now are rapidly being replaced by
other efficient amines. It reacts with H2S and CO2 as follows;
2(RNH2) + H2S ↔ (RNH3)2S
(RNH3)2S + H2S ↔ 2(RNH3)HS
2(RNH2) + CO2 ↔ RNHCOONH3R
1.1. Disadvantages
 It irreversibly forms reaction products with carbonyl sulfide (COS) and carbon disulfide
(CS2), which results in excessive solution loss and an increase of solid products in the
circulating solution. These particles cause foaming in the amine solution.
 These are more corrosive in nature as compared to other amines, particularly if the
amine concentration exceeds 20 % or the solution is highly loaded with acid gas. So,
the high partial pressure of acid gas limits its capacity.
 Requires large circulation rates and high energy consumption.
 It bears relatively higher vapor pressure causing significant vapor losses.
 More prone to degradation during normal operation.
 It has a high heat of reaction with CO2/H2S and requires high energy for regeneration.

1.2. Applications
It is still preferred for gases having low concentrations of CO2/H2S and where carbonyl sulfide
(COS) and carbon disulfide (CS2) are not present. Further, when the gas stream is at low pressure
and maximum H2S/CO2 removal is required.
2. Diethanolamine (DEA)
Diethanolamine (DEA) has replaced Monoethanolamine (MEA) and becoming the most widely
used gas sweetening solvent because of its overwhelming advantages over Monoethanolamine
(MEA). It can treat gases in the presence of COS and CS2 and also can be regenerated when
reacts with carbonyl sulfide (COS) and carbon disulfide (CS2). Because of fewer corrosion
problems and the high efficiency of acidic gas removal, it is the predominant chemical being used
in refineries. It is a secondary amine with lower reactivity and corrosivity than Monoethanolamine
(MEA). The basic reactions with CO2 and H2S are the same as Monoethanolamine (MEA).
2R2NH + H2S ↔ (R2NH2)2S
(R2NH2)2S + H2S ↔ 2R2NH2SH
2R2NH + CO2 ↔R2NCOONH2R2
2.1. Advantages
 It has a lower vapor pressure so minor solution loss. It has lesser heat of reaction,
therefore, is easier to regenerate than MEA.
 Loading up to 0.65 mol of acid gas per mole of DEA can be achieved with fewer
operational problems than MEA because of the elimination of the degradation products.
 It is a weaker base and less reactive in comparison to MEA. Therefore, fewer corrosive
problems despite twice the solution strength of MEA.
 Foaming is reduced due to the absence of degradation and corrosion products.
 Do not degrade when in contact with H2S, CO2, or mercaptans.
 Lower circulation rates, reduced energy consumption, and resistance to degradation, as
opposed to MEA.
 Under normal operating conditions, DEA decomposition products can be removed quite
easily by filtration through activated carbon.
 DEA (Secondary Amine) is much less reactive with carbonyl sulfide (COS) and carbon
disulfide (CS2) than primary amines (MEA) and the reaction products are not corrosive.
Therefore, DEA is a better choice for the treatment of gas streams that contain carbon
disulfide (CS2)/CO2.
 It can be used equally for high and low-pressure applications.
2.2. Disadvantages
 DEA undergoes numerous irreversible reactions with CO2 that form corrosive
degradation products, therefore, DEA may not be the optimum choice for treating gases
with high CO2 content.
2.3. Applications
 DEA is used to treat natural gas, refinery off-gases, recycle gases of hydrotreating and
hydrocracking units, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and off-gases of the refinery before
being sent to the refinery fuel gas system.
 DEA process has been widely used for the treatment of high-pressure natural gases
with high concentrations of acidic components, especially if carbonyl sulfide (COS) and
carbon disulfide (CS2) is also present in a considerable quantity.
3. Methyldiethanolamine (MDEA)
MDEA is a good choice for the selective absorption of H2S in the presence of CO2. Reduced
weight percent solutions are typically used in low-pressure and selective gas applications.
Corrosion is much decreased even under high acid gas loadings. Its principal disadvantage is its
slow reaction to CO2. MDEA is used in the purification of non-hydrocarbon gases such as the
products from coal gasification processes and Claus plant tail gas treatment section.

3.1. Advantages
 The overwhelming advantage of MDEA is its high selectivity for H2S in the presence of
CO2.
 Other merits of MDEA include low vapor pressure, lesser heat of reaction, and higher
resistance to thermal and chemical degradation.
 Because of its low vapor pressure, MDEA can be used in concentrations up to 60 wt%
in aqueous solutions without considerable evaporation losses.
 It is essentially non-corrosive and has low specific heat and heat of reaction with H2S
and CO2.
3.2. Disadvantages
 In the presence of oxygen, MDEA forms corrosive acids which, if not removed can result
in an accumulation of iron sulfide in the system.
 Generally, MDEA reactivity is less reactive and may not meet treated product
specifications at low gas pressures.
 It is a tertiary type amine and cannot react directly with CO2. When CO2 is dissolved in
water, a Bi-carbonium ion is formed that reacts with MDEA. Therefore, less efficient to
remove CO2. MDEA is less reactive in comparison to DEA or MEA.
4. Diglycolamine (DGA)
The solvent comes in the category of primary amines. In many respects is similar to
monoethanolamine (MEA), except that its low vapor pressure permits its use in relatively high
concentrations (40~60 %). High concentration, results in lower circulation rates and steam
consumption in contrast to MEA. DGA has proven to be very effective for purifying large volumes
of low-pressure acid gases.
4.1. Advantages
 DGA can operate at high ambient temperatures and can treat acid gas at moderate
pressures.
 It has low capital and operating cost, as well as improved operation at relatively low
pressures as opposed to MEA.
 It can partially remove carbonyl sulfide (COS) and a sufficient portion of DGA can be
recovered by steam distillation, from the degradation products produced by the reaction
of DGA with CO and carbonyl sulfide (COS).
 Despite high concentrations, it does not cause corrosion in comparison to other amines.
 High concentration of solution, requires low rates, less steam requirement for
regeneration, and high acid gas loading as opposed to MEA.
5. Diisopropanolamine (DIPA)
DIPA is a secondary amine and has been used for the treatment of refinery and natural gas
streams. It is used most frequently in the ADIP process of acid gas treatment licensed by Shell.
At low pressure, DIPA is more selective towards H2S, and at higher pressures, it removes both
CO2 and H2S. With the right design, DIPA systems are also capable of moderate selectivity
toward H2S in the presence of CO2.

5.1. Advantages
 DIPA reacts with carbonyl sulfide (COS) and carbon disulfide (CS2) and the products
can easily be regenerated.
 It is non-corrosive and also requires less heat for the regeneration of rich amine.
 DIPA is very resistant to degradation. Carbon and particulate filtration are usually
sufficient to maintain a clean solution.
5.2. Applications
DIPA is used to treat Claus Sulfur Recovery Unit tail gas streams, refinery gases, and liquified
petroleum gas (LPG) streams, Mercaptans removal, especially when carbonyl sulfide (COS) is
present.
6. Mixed Amines
Mixed Amines are generally mixtures of MDEA and Diethanolamine (DEA) or Monoethanolamine
(MEA) and are used to enhance CO2 removal by MDEA. The addition of primary or secondary
amines, such as MEA and DEA, has been found to enhance the rate of CO2 absorption
significantly without declining MDEA’s many advantages. Such mixtures are called MDEA-based
amines. At lower MEA and DEA concentrations, the overall amine strength can be as high as
55% (wt), without causing corrosion problems.
Amine mixtures are particularly useful for low-pressure applications because MDEA becomes
less capable of CO2 removal. At higher pressures, amine mixtures appear to have little or no
advantage over MDEA. Another useful feature of mixed amine is that the formulation can be
varied to meet specific site requirements.
7. References
1. Petroleum and Gas Field Processing BY H. K. Albdel-Aal, Mohamed Aggour, M.A.
Fahim
2. Gas Purification by Arthur 1. Kohl Richard B. Nielsen, Fifth Edition

You might also like