PARTY POLITICS IN NIGERIA

INTRODUCTION

Party politics in Nigeria is a central component of the country’s political framework and has
significantly influenced its governance and development since independence in 1960. Political
parties in Nigeria serve as the primary platforms for political participation and representation, as
well as the formulation and implementation of public policies. Understanding the intricacies of
party politics is crucial for grasping the broader political and governance issues that Nigeria
faces, including the challenges and opportunities for democratic consolidation.

The historical evolution of party politics in Nigeria reflects the country’s journey through
different political eras, from pre-independence movements to the present-day Fourth Republic.
This historical perspective is essential for understanding how past political dynamics shape
contemporary party politics. Major political parties, such as the People’s Democratic Party
(PDP) and the All Progressives Congress (APC), play pivotal roles in Nigeria’s political
landscape. Analyzing their structures, ideologies, and policies provides insight into their
influence on the country’s political and governance processes.

Electoral processes in Nigeria are closely intertwined with party politics, influencing how parties
operate, mobilize support, and compete for power. The nature of electoral systems, campaign
strategies, and the challenges faced during elections—such as corruption, violence, and voter
apathy—affect the effectiveness and fairness of the political process. Understanding these
dynamics is vital for assessing the health of Nigeria’s democracy and the prospects for future
political stability.

Party politics also significantly impacts governance and policy making in Nigeria. The role of
political parties in legislative processes, executive decision-making, and policy implementation
shapes the country’s governance outcomes. Examining how party politics either promotes or
hinders good governance provides important insights into the functioning of Nigeria’s political
system.

Contemporary issues in Nigerian party politics, such as the role of youth and women, ethnic and
regional dynamics, and the future prospects of the political landscape, are critical for
understanding ongoing changes and potential future developments. Addressing these issues is
key to strengthening democratic governance and ensuring inclusive political participation. By
exploring these aspects, this study aims to contribute to a comprehensive understanding of party
politics in Nigeria and its implications for the country's political future.

HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF PARTY POLITICS IN NIGERIA

The historical evolution of party politics in Nigeria can be traced back to the early 20th century,
with the emergence of political movements during the colonial period. These movements were
initially centered around regional and ethnic identities, aiming to address local grievances and
advocate for greater autonomy from colonial rule. Notable among these early political
organizations were the Nigerian National Democratic Party (NNDP), founded in 1923 by
Herbert Macaulay, which was the first political party in Nigeria, and the National Council of
Nigeria and the Cameroons (NCNC), established in 1944 by Nnamdi Azikiwe. These early
parties laid the groundwork for the political mobilization that would lead to Nigeria's
independence in 1960 (Falola & Heaton, 2008).

The First Republic (1960-1966) marked the formal beginning of party politics in independent
Nigeria. This period was characterized by a multiparty system dominated by three major regional
parties: the Northern People's Congress (NPC), the Action Group (AG), and the NCNC. Each
party primarily represented the interests of the major ethnic groups in their respective regions—
the Hausa-Fulani in the North, the Yoruba in the West, and the Igbo in the East. The intense
competition and regionalism during this period led to significant political instability, culminating
in a military coup in 1966 and the subsequent civil war from 1967 to 1970 (Diamond, 1988).

Following the civil war, Nigeria experienced a series of military regimes interspersed with brief
periods of civilian rule. The Second Republic (1979-1983) saw the return of party politics with
the formation of new political parties, such as the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) and the Unity
Party of Nigeria (UPN). However, this period was short-lived due to another military coup in
1983. The military's frequent intervention in politics significantly disrupted the development of
stable party systems and democratic institutions (Ojo, 2006).
The transition to the Fourth Republic in 1999 marked a significant milestone in Nigeria's
political history, with the establishment of a more enduring democratic framework. The People’s
Democratic Party (PDP) emerged as the dominant party, winning the first three presidential
elections. The All Progressives Congress (APC) was later formed in 2013 through a merger of
four opposition parties and succeeded in breaking the PDP's dominance by winning the 2015
presidential election. The Fourth Republic has seen a more stable party system, although
challenges such as electoral fraud, political violence, and internal party conflicts persist (Suberu,
2001).

The evolution of party politics in Nigeria highlights the complexities and challenges of building
a stable and inclusive political system. From the early regional and ethnic-based parties to the
current multiparty system, Nigeria's political history reflects the ongoing struggle to balance
diverse interests and achieve democratic consolidation. Understanding this historical context is
essential for analyzing contemporary party politics and its impact on governance and
development in Nigeria.

MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES IN NIGERIA

The People’s Democratic Party (PDP)

The People’s Democratic Party (PDP) has been one of the most influential political parties in
Nigeria since the advent of the Fourth Republic in 1999. Formed in 1998, the PDP quickly
established itself as a dominant force, winning the presidential elections in 1999, 2003, and 2007.
The party's ideology is broadly centrist, advocating for economic liberalization, social justice,
and federalism. The PDP's initial success can be attributed to its broad-based support across
different regions and ethnic groups, as well as its ability to attract influential political figures and
leverage state resources (Suberu, 2001).

However, internal conflicts and accusations of corruption have plagued the PDP, leading to a
significant decline in its dominance. The 2013 defection of several prominent members to the
newly formed All Progressives Congress (APC) marked a turning point. Despite these
challenges, the PDP remains a major player in Nigerian politics, continuously striving to regain
its former influence and address internal issues to strengthen its position in future elections
(Lewis, 2011).

The All Progressives Congress (APC)

The All Progressives Congress (APC) was established in 2013 through the merger of four
opposition parties: the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), the Congress for Progressive Change
(CPC), the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP), and a faction of the All Progressives Grand
Alliance (APGA). The APC emerged as a formidable opposition to the PDP, advocating for
change and promising to address issues such as corruption, insecurity, and economic
mismanagement. The APC's platform combines progressive and conservative elements,
emphasizing economic reform, anti-corruption measures, and national unity (Smith, 2014).

In the 2015 general elections, the APC made history by defeating the incumbent PDP, with
Muhammadu Buhari winning the presidency. This victory marked the first time in Nigeria's
history that an incumbent president was defeated in a democratic election, signifying a major
shift in the political landscape. The APC's success can be attributed to its ability to unify various
opposition groups and present a cohesive alternative to the PDP. Despite internal challenges and
criticisms regarding its governance, the APC has continued to be a significant force in Nigerian
politics (Agbu, 2016).

Minor Parties and Emerging Political Movements

Aside from the PDP and APC, Nigeria has numerous minor parties and emerging political
movements that contribute to the diversity of its political landscape. These parties often represent
specific regional, ethnic, or interest groups and play crucial roles in local and state politics.
Examples include the Social Democratic Party (SDP), the Labour Party (LP), and the All
Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA). While these parties typically have limited national
influence, they are important for fostering political pluralism and providing alternatives to the
dominant parties (Ayoade, 2008).

Emerging political movements, often led by young activists and professionals, have also begun
to challenge the traditional political order. Movements such as the #NotTooYoungToRun
campaign and various civil society organizations are advocating for greater youth participation
and systemic reforms. These movements highlight the growing demand for a more inclusive and
accountable political system in Nigeria (Kew & Phillips, 2013).

Comparative Analysis of Party Ideologies and Policies

The PDP and APC, despite their dominance, have notable ideological and policy differences that
shape their governance approaches. The PDP traditionally leans towards a centrist ideology,
focusing on economic liberalization, social justice, and maintaining a strong federal structure. In
contrast, the APC combines elements of progressivism and conservatism, emphasizing anti-
corruption, economic reforms, and national unity.

Policy differences are evident in their approaches to key issues such as the economy, security,
and governance. The PDP's economic policies have historically emphasized privatization and
liberalization, while the APC has focused on economic diversification and addressing corruption.
In terms of security, both parties have faced challenges, but their strategies and rhetoric often
differ, with the APC placing a strong emphasis on military solutions and the PDP advocating for
a more multifaceted approach.

PARTY POLITICS AND ELECTORAL PROCESSES

Electoral processes are integral to the functioning of party politics in Nigeria, serving as
mechanisms for citizens to choose their representatives and shape the political landscape.
However, Nigeria's electoral history has been marred by irregularities, violence, and challenges
that impact the credibility and fairness of elections. Understanding the dynamics of electoral
processes is crucial for analyzing the role of political parties and their influence on governance.

Electoral Systems and Their Influence on Party Politics

The electoral system in Nigeria significantly influences party politics and the behavior of
political parties. Nigeria operates a mixed-member proportional representation system,
combining elements of first-past-the-post and proportional representation. This system allows for
both constituency-based representation and proportional allocation of seats based on party vote
shares. The choice of electoral system impacts party strategies, candidate selection, and
coalition-building efforts. For instance, in a first-past-the-post system, parties may focus on
winning individual constituencies, whereas in a proportional representation system, parties may
prioritize maximizing their share of the national vote to secure seats in the legislature.
Understanding the nuances of the electoral system is crucial for analyzing party dynamics and
electoral outcomes in Nigeria (Gyimah-Boadi & Nugent, 2017).

Campaign Strategies and Political Mobilization

Campaign strategies and political mobilization are essential components of party politics in
Nigeria, influencing voter engagement, turnout, and electoral outcomes. Political parties invest
significant resources in mobilizing voters through various means, including rallies, door-to-door
canvassing, and media advertisements. Social media platforms have also become increasingly
important for reaching younger voters and disseminating campaign messages. Campaign
strategies often vary depending on the target demographic, regional dynamics, and available
resources. Successful campaigns require effective messaging, grassroots organizing, and
strategic alliances with interest groups and stakeholders. However, challenges such as funding
constraints, logistical issues, and security concerns can affect the effectiveness of campaign
efforts (Adekanye, 2017).

Challenges in the Electoral Process: Corruption, Violence, and Voter Apathy

Despite efforts to improve electoral integrity, Nigeria continues to face significant challenges in
its electoral process, including corruption, violence, and voter apathy. Electoral corruption,
including vote buying, ballot stuffing, and manipulation of voter registration, undermines the
credibility of elections and erodes public trust in the democratic process. Electoral violence, such
as intimidation of voters, attacks on candidates, and destruction of property, poses a threat to the
security and stability of the electoral process. Additionally, voter apathy, driven by
disillusionment with the political system, perceived electoral irregularities, and lack of
confidence in political parties, contributes to low voter turnout and undermines the legitimacy of
election outcomes. Addressing these challenges requires comprehensive reforms, including
strengthening electoral institutions, enhancing security measures, and promoting civic education
and voter participation (Bratton & Van de Walle, 1997).
The Role of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) plays a critical role in overseeing
electoral processes and ensuring their transparency, fairness, and credibility. Established in 1998,
INEC is responsible for voter registration, the conduct of elections, and the resolution of
electoral disputes. INEC is mandated to organize free, fair, and credible elections in Nigeria and
has made significant efforts to improve electoral management and integrity. These efforts
include the introduction of biometric voter registration, the use of electronic voting systems, and
the deployment of technology for result transmission and monitoring. Despite facing challenges
such as logistical constraints, allegations of bias, and security threats, INEC remains pivotal in
upholding the integrity of Nigeria's electoral democracy and promoting public confidence in the
electoral process (Attahiru, 2019).

IMPACT OF PARTY POLITICS ON GOVERNANCE AND POLICY

MAKING

The influence of party politics on governance and policy making in Nigeria is profound, shaping
the country's political landscape and impacting its development trajectory. Political parties play
crucial roles in legislative processes, executive decision-making, and the implementation of
public policies. Understanding how party politics interacts with governance processes is essential
for assessing Nigeria's democratic governance and policy outcomes.

Political parties in Nigeria exert significant influence in legislative processes, particularly in the
National Assembly, where they determine the agenda, debate policies, and pass laws. The
majority party or coalition often controls the legislative agenda, committee assignments, and the
passage of legislation. Party discipline and cohesion play crucial roles in ensuring the passage of
party priorities and government agendas. However, internal party conflicts, ideological
differences, and personal ambitions can sometimes hinder legislative effectiveness and
compromise governance outcomes (Omotola, 2006).

In the executive branch, party politics shapes decision-making processes and policy
implementation. The party in power typically appoints government officials, formulates policies,
and oversees their implementation. The president, as the head of the ruling party, plays a central
role in setting the policy agenda and implementing party priorities. However, the president's
ability to govern effectively is often contingent on party support, coalition dynamics, and
institutional constraints. Challenges such as corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency, and political
interference can impede the implementation of government policies and undermine governance
effectiveness (Nwolise, 2010).

The impact of party politics on governance extends beyond formal institutions to include
informal power structures and patronage networks. Political parties often serve as conduits for
accessing resources, opportunities, and political patronage. Party members and supporters may
receive preferential treatment, appointments, or contracts based on their loyalty and contributions
to the party. This patronage system can perpetuate clientelism, nepotism, and corruption,
undermining meritocracy and accountability in governance (Gboyega, 2001).

The role of opposition parties is also crucial in Nigeria's governance dynamics, providing checks
and balances on government power and holding the ruling party accountable. Opposition parties
challenge government policies, scrutinize executive actions, and offer alternative visions for
governance. However, the effectiveness of opposition parties is often constrained by factors such
as limited resources, electoral disadvantages, and government repression. Strengthening
opposition parties and promoting a vibrant political competition is essential for fostering
democratic governance and accountability in Nigeria (Oyedele, 2015).

CONCLUSION
Party politics in Nigeria exerts a profound influence on governance and policy making, shaping
the country's political landscape and impacting its development trajectory. Across legislative
processes, executive decision-making, and policy implementation, political parties play central
roles in determining agendas, passing laws, and setting priorities. However, the interaction
between party politics and governance processes is complex, characterized by both opportunities
and challenges.
In legislative processes, majority parties or coalitions control the agenda and drive policy
decisions, emphasizing the importance of party discipline and cohesion. Executive branches are
similarly influenced by party politics, with the ruling party setting the policy agenda and
overseeing implementation. Yet, challenges such as corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency, and
patronage networks can hinder effective governance and compromise policy outcomes.

Opposition parties provide crucial checks and balances, holding the ruling party accountable and
offering alternative visions for governance. However, they often face constraints such as limited
resources and government repression. Strengthening opposition parties and promoting political
competition are essential for fostering democratic governance and accountability.

The impact of party politics extends beyond formal institutions to include informal power
structures and patronage networks, perpetuating clientelism and corruption. Addressing these
challenges requires comprehensive reforms, including strengthening democratic institutions,
promoting political transparency and accountability, and enhancing citizen participation.

In conclusion, understanding the dynamics of party politics is essential for assessing Nigeria's
democratic governance and addressing governance challenges. Strengthening democratic
institutions, promoting political competition, and enhancing citizen participation are vital for
improving governance effectiveness and advancing democratic development in Nigeria.
 REFERENCES
Adebanwi, W. (2019). Nigeria: Everyday Life and the Absent State. Indiana University Press.
Adekanye, A. O. (2017). Social Media, Youth Participation and Political Campaign in Nigeria.
Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 9(2), 14-25.
Agbu, O. (2016). Party Politics and Elections in Nigeria. Africa Spectrum, 51(1), 79-93.
Attahiru, J. (2019). The Independent National Electoral Commission and the Management of the
Nigerian Electoral Process: The Challenges and Prospects. IOSR Journal of Humanities
and Social Science, 24(3), 1-10.
Bratton, M., & Van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions
in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Diamond, L. (1988). Class, Ethnicity, and Democracy in Nigeria: The Failure of the First
Republic. Syracuse University Press.
Falola, T., & Heaton, M. M. (2008). A History of Nigeria. Cambridge University Press.
Gboyega, A. (2001). Democracy and Political Corruption in Nigeria: Analysis and Solution.
Journal of Modern African Studies, 39(4), 643-661.
Gyimah-Boadi, E., & Nugent, P. (2017). Electoral Systems and Democratization in Africa.
Oxford University Press.
Ibeanu, O., & Orji, N. (2014). Political Parties and Democracy in Nigeria. Friedrich-Ebert-
Stiftung.
Jinadu, A. A. (2008). Electoral Violence and Nigeria’s Democratic Future. African Security
Review, 17(2), 105-116.
Nwolise, O. B. (2010). Democracy and Good Governance in Nigeria: The Challenges of the
Fourth Republic. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 12(2), 211-233.
Omotola, J. S. (2006). Party Politics and Legislative Effectiveness in Nigeria’s National
Assembly. Africa Development, 31(3), 87-107.
Oyedele, O. (2015). The Role of Opposition Parties in Nigeria’s Democratic Development.
Journal of Governance and Development, 11(1), 1-22.
Smith, D. (2014). Nigeria's 2015 Presidential Election: Contingencies and Implications. African
Affairs, 114(456), 152-163.
Suberu, R. T. (2001). Federalism and Ethnic Conflict in Nigeria. United States Institute of Peace
Press.