RUBRIC 2 : RUBRICS FOR PRESENTATION SKILLS
CRITERIA
1. Reasoning and
Explanation
Ability to justify the
ideas and to communicate
the information regarding
the content in a way that is
appropriate for the
listener
(20%)
2. Creativity and
Imagination
Innovative/novel ideas
/materials/methods
formulated are novel,
striking, and highly
effective. Important
ideas/feelings are
highlighted in sophisticated
ways
(20 %)
Footnote:
PRESENTATION SKILLS – CLO 2 (A5, PLO5)
4 3
EXCELLENT
➢ The student presents
information, findings,
arguments and supporting
evidence in an extremely
interesting manner, concisely
and logically, and the audience
can easily follow the line of
reasoning.
➢ Selects information,
develops ideas and uses a style
appropriate to the purpose,
tasks and audience.
➢ Clearly and completely
addresses alternative or
opposing perspectives.
➢ Approaches/moves/directio
ns/ideas/perspectives were
used for an exemplary
understanding or effect for
the listener
➢ There is an effective blend of
personal style and technical
knowledge
➢ Familiar materials and ideas
have been combined in new
and imaginative ways
2 1 TOTAL
GOOD AVERAGE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
➢ The student presents ➢ The student presents ➢ The student needs to
information, findings, information, findings, arguments present information and
arguments and supporting and supporting evidence in a way findings concisely and
evidence clearly, concisely that is sometimes clear, concise logically; arguments lack
and logically; the line of and logical; the line of reasoning supporting evidence, and
reasoning is followed. is sometimes hard to follow. the audience cannot
➢ Selects information, ➢ Attempts to select information, follow the line of
develops ideas and uses a develop ideas and uses a style reasoning.
style appropriate to the appropriate to the purpose, tasks ➢ Selects information,
purpose, tasks and and audience. develops ideas and uses a
audience but needs to ➢ Attempts to address alternative style inappropriate to the
fully succeed. or opposing perspectives but not purpose, tasks and
➢ Addresses alternative or clearly or completely audience (maybe too
opposing perspectives much or too little
information or the wrong
approach).
➢ does not address
alternative or opposing
perspectives
➢ Approaches/moves/direct ➢ The approach is trite, and the ➢ Ideas may not be focused
ions/ideas/perspectives ideas are clichéd, leading to a or developed; the primary
were used but no impact flat and predictable purpose is not clear.
on audience performance. ➢ The work is uncreative.
➢ There are personal ➢ The work is not very creative. ➢ The performance
touches and technical ➢ There is little sense of the recreates someone else’s
knowledge scattered in student’s touch, voice, or style performance or relies
the work here. exclusively on the
➢ The work keeps the ➢ There is excessive and models/algorithms/move
audience mostly engaged incoherent use of different s/recipes/templates/direc
➢ There is a discernible and materials, techniques, ideas tions/materials provided.
interesting
Academic Office, Jan 23
Industry Rubric
 CRITERIA
3. Critical thinking
Ability to observe,
interrogate and
rationally evaluate
things that arise
during industrial training
(20%)
4. Interdisciplinarity
Ability to carry out
a teaching-learning
process combining
subjects from
the programme/discipline
and adopting a
broad perspective
(10%)
5. Communication:
Footnote:
PRESENTATION SKILLS – CLO 2 (A5, PLO5)
4 3
EXCELLENT
➢ The audience is highly
responsive to the work.
➢ The work is vivid through
careful attention to telling
details and deft, engaging
touches.
➢ A clear and confident voice
and style are present
➢ The student has a clear grasp
of the information.
➢ The explanation for the
analysis is logical and relevant.
➢ Clearly identifies the
challenge and subsidiary,
embedded, or implicit aspects.
➢ Speaking using outline or
note cards are used for
reference only.
➢ Shows a thorough
understanding of the
subjects/courses’ insights,
assumptions, and context.
➢ Relevant terms and concepts
are explained clearly.
➢ Critical analysis of the
strengths and weaknesses of
each disciplinary insight
concerning theories,
methods and assumptions
are explained in detail.
➢ Consistently good accent and
intonation.
GOOD
effect/focus/message/styl
e, with lapses in
execution.
➢ The work takes some risks
in terms of
methods/style/content.
➢ The student has a grasp of
the information.
➢ Supporting material may
lack originality.
➢ The student is at ease with
the expected answers to
all questions but fails to
elaborate.
➢ Over-dependence on
notes may be observed.
➢ Shows an understanding
of the subjects/courses’
insights, assumptions,
and context.
➢ Relevant terms and
concepts are used but
not explained clearly.
➢ Analysis of strengths and
weaknesses of the
theories, methods and
assumptions are
mentioned.
➢ Generally good
➢ Answers without
hesitation and extends
2 1
AVERAGE
➢ The student may have
confused great care and
precision with creativity – the
work is more polished than
imaginative or revealing.
➢ The student has a very
minimum grasp of the
information.
➢ Supporting material lack
originality.
➢ The student is at ease with
expected answers to all
questions but fails to
elaborate.
➢ Over-dependence on notes
may be observed.
➢ Uses the subjects/courses’
insights, assumptions, and
context randomly.
➢ Terms and concepts are used
with no explanation.
➢ The theories, methods and
assumptions are mentioned.
➢ Generally accurate, but some
inconsistency.
TOTAL
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
➢ The audience cannot
understand the
presentation because
there is no sequence of
information.
➢ The student does not
have a grasp of
information; the student
cannot answer questions
about the subject.
➢ Inaccurate, generalized,
or inappropriate
supporting material may
be used.
➢ Reading from the notes
may be observed.
➢ No subjects/courses’
insights, assumptions,
and context are used.
➢ Terms and concepts are
not used.
➢ The theories, methods
and assumptions are not
mentioned.
➢ Understandable, but
comprehension is
sometimes delayed.
Academic Office, Jan 23
Industry Rubric
 CRITERIA 4 3
EXCELLENT
Pronunciation and ➢ Responds readily and shows
Intonation, Interaction and initiative, conversation
Fluency. sustained at a reasonable
Range and Accuracy of speed; language expressed
Language fluently
(10%) ➢ A wide range of vocabulary,
complex structures and
various verb tenses.
➢ Errors usually appear in more
complex structures.
6. Enthusiasm/Audience ➢ Demonstrates strong
Awareness: enthusiasm about the topic
during the entire presentation. ➢ Raises audience
Ability to address the ➢ Significantly increases
audience without making audience understanding and
them lose interest and able knowledge of the topic.
to answer the questions. ➢ Convinces the audience to
(10%) recognize the validity and
importance of the topic
presented.
7. Adaptability: ➢ Effectively incorporates
feedback in different
Ability to adapt to situations.
any context, relationship or ➢ Positively handles praise,
situation in a positive way disappointments, and
criticism.
(10%) ➢ Understands, negotiates, and
balances diverse viewpoints
and beliefs to create effective
solutions, especially in multi-
cultural situations.
Footnote:
PRESENTATION SKILLS – CLO 2 (A5, PLO5)
2 1 TOTAL
GOOD AVERAGE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
responses beyond the ➢ Ready responses: some ➢ Some reaction.
minimum with evidence of an ability to Sometimes hesitant, little
some flow of language. sustain a conversation; little if natural flow of language.
➢ A range of vocabulary; any initiative. ➢ Very limited vocabulary;
some complex structures ➢ Limited vocabulary: sentences short, simple sentences.
and a variety of verb are generally simple but ➢ Errors are very frequent.
tenses occasionally more complex.
attempted, though not ➢ Errors are quite frequent, but
always well formed. the language is more accurate
➢ Some errors occur but than inaccurate.
the message is clear.
➢ Shows some enthusiastic ➢ Shows little or mixed feelings ➢ Shows no interest in the
feelings about the topic about the topic being presented topic presented
➢ Raises audience understanding ➢ Fails to increase
understanding and and knowledge of some points audience understanding
awareness of most points of knowledge of the
➢ Tries to convince the topic
audience of the importance
of the topic presented
➢ Incorporates feedback. ➢ Attempts to incorporate ➢ Never attempt to
➢ Handles praise, feedback. incorporate feedback.
disappointments, and ➢ Attempts to deal positively ➢ Never attempts to
criticism. with praise, setbacks and understand, negotiate
➢ Understands, negotiates criticism. diverse views and beliefs
and balances diverse ➢ Attempts to understand,
viewpoints and beliefs to negotiate diverse views and
create effective solutions. beliefs
Total = ----------- / 100 marks
Academic Office, Jan 23
Industry Rubric
 SUMMARY OF CLO, PLO AND RUBRICS
INDUSTRY
NO ASSESSMENT COMPONENT CLO PLO (MAJOR) WEIGHTAGE (%) RUBRIC
PLO8
1 EXTERNAL EVALUATION REPORT CLO1 (Leadership, Autonomy & 40% RUBRIC 1
Responsibility)
PRESENTATION SKILLS CLO2 PLO5
2 30% RUBRIC 2
(Communication Skill)
STUDENT INTERNSHIP REPORT, CLO3 PLO9
3 LOGBOOK & REFLECTION (LESSON (Personal Skills) 30% RUBRIC 3
PLANS)

Footnote:
PRESENTATION SKILLS – CLO 2 (A5, PLO5) Academic Office, Jan 23
Industry Rubric