Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Download ebook pdf of ட ஜ ட டல கரன ச First Edition க ர த த க வ ல full chapter
Download ebook pdf of ட ஜ ட டல கரன ச First Edition க ர த த க வ ல full chapter
■■■
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookstep.com/download/ebook-47284558/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://ebookstep.com/product/notos-sayi-95-1st-edition-kolektif/
https://ebookstep.com/product/martin-luthers-95-thesen-nebst-dem-
sermon-von-ablass-und-gnade-1517-1st-edition-martin-luther-kurt-
aland/
https://ebookstep.com/product/martin-luthers-95-thesen-nebst-dem-
sermon-von-ablas-und-gnade-1517-sonderdruck-aus-der-
lutherausgabe-von-o-clemen-3rd-edition-claus-steinle/
https://ebookstep.com/product/95-strategi-mengajar-multiple-
intelligences-mengajar-sesuai-kerja-otak-dan-gaya-belajar-siswa-
alamsyah-said-s-pd-m-si-andi-budimanjaya-s-pd/
Una grammatica italiana per tutti 2 edizione aggiornata
2020 B2 B2 1st Edition Alessandra Latino Marida
Muscolino
https://ebookstep.com/product/una-grammatica-italiana-per-
tutti-2-edizione-aggiornata-2020-b2-b2-1st-edition-alessandra-
latino-marida-muscolino/
https://ebookstep.com/product/aula-internacional-plus-4-b2-1-1st-
edition-difusion/
https://ebookstep.com/product/edito-b2-4e-edition-4th-edition-
myriam-abou-samra/
https://ebookstep.com/product/l-eredita-b1-b2-primi-racconti-1st-
edition-luisa-brisi/
https://ebookstep.com/product/1000-questions-1000-answers-angol-
kozepfok-b2-nemethne-hock-ildiko/
st st
po po
st st
fir fir
https://t.me/timepasspdf e_ e_
Th Th
e/ e/
.m
//t t.m
s:
//
s:
tp
ht
tp
ht
st st
po po
st st
fir fir
e_ e_
ThTh
e/ e/
.m
//t t.m
s:
//
s:
tp
ht
tp
ht
st st
po po
st st
fir fir
e_ e_
ThTh
e/ e/
.m
//t t.m
s:
//
s:
tp
ht
tp
ht
st
https://t.me/timepasspdf
st
po po
st st
fir fir
e_ e_
ThTh
e/ e/
.m
//t t.m
s:
//
s:
tp
ht
tp
ht
st st
po po
st st
fir fir
e_ e_
ThTh
e/ e/
.m
//t t.m
s:
//
s:
tp
ht
tp
ht
st st
po po
st st
fir fir
e_ e_
ThTh
e/ e/
.m
//t t.m
s:
//
s:
tp
ht
tp
ht
st st
po po
st st
fir fir
e_ e_
ThTh
e/ e/
.m
//t t.m
s:
//
s:
tp
ht
tp
ht
st st
https://t.me/timepasspdf
po po
st st
fir fir
e_ e_
ThTh
e/ e/
.m
//t t.m
s:
//
s:
tp
ht
tp
ht
st st
po po
st st
fir fir
e_ e_
ThTh
e/ e/
.m
//t t.m
s:
//
s:
tp
ht
tp
ht
st st
po po
st st
fir fir
e_ e_
ThTh
e/ e/
.m
//t t.m
s:
//
s:
tp
ht
tp
ht
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
BEN JONSON.
CHAPTER CLXXVII.
CLXXVIII.
“There is no efficacy in numbers, said the wiser Philosophers; and very truly,”—saith
Bishop Hacket in repeating this sentence; but he continues,—“some numbers are apt
to enforce a reverent esteem towards them, by considering miraculous occurrences
which fell out in holy Scripture on such and such a number.—Non potest fortuitò fieri,
quod tam sæpe fit, says Maldonatus whom I never find superstitious in this matter. It
falls out too often to be called contingent; and the oftener it falls out, the more to be
attended.”
CHAPTER CLXXIX.
CHAPTER CLXXX.
CHAPTER CLXXXI.
“If thou beest not so handsome as thou wouldest have been thank God thou art not
more unhandsome than thou art. 'Tis His mercy thou art not the mark for passenger's
fingers to point at, an Heteroclite in nature, with some member defective or
redundant. Be glad that thy clay cottage hath all the necessary forms thereto
belonging, though the outside be not so fairly plaistered as some others.”
CHAPTER CLXXXII.
Res fisci est, ubicunque natat. Whatsoever swims upon any water, belongs to this
exchequer.
What is age
But the holy place of life, the chapel of ease
For all men's wearied miseries?
MASSINGER.
CHAPTER CLXXXIV.
FREEMAN'S SERMONS.
CHAPTER CLXXXV.
CHAPTER CLXXXVI.
OLD FORTUNATUS.
CHAPTER CLXXXVII.
Voilà mon conte.—Je ne sçay s'il est vray; mais, je l'ay ainsi ouy conter.—Possible
que cela est faux, possible que non.—Je m'en rapporte à ce qui en est. Il ne sera pas
damné qui le croira, ou décroira.
BRANTÔME.
INTERCHAPTER XX.
ARCH-CHAPTER.
CHAPTER CLXXXVIII.
FOLLY IN PRINT, REFERRED TO, BUT (N.B.) NOT EXEMPLIFIED. THE FAIR MAID
OF DONCASTER. DOUBTS CONCERNING THE AUTHENTICITY OF HER STORY.
THEVENARD, AND LOVE ON A NEW FOOTING. STARS AND GARTERS, A
MONITORY ANECDOTE FOR OUR SEX, AND A WHOLESOME NOVELTY IN
DRESS RECOMMENDED TO BOTH.
CHAPTER CLXXXIX.
CHAPTER CXC.
IL CORTEGIANO.
CHAPTER CXCI.
A SERIOUS WORD IN SAD APOLOGY FOR ONE OF THE MANY FOOLISH WAYS
IN WHICH TIME IS MIS-SPENT.
Time as he passes us, has a dove's wing,
Unsoil'd, and swift, and of a silken sound;
But the World's Time, is Time in masquerade!
Their's, should I paint him, has his pinions fledged,
With motley plumes; and where the peacock shews
His azure eyes, is tinctured black and red
With spots quadrangular of diamond form,
Ensanguined hearts, clubs typical of strife,
And spades, the emblem of untimely graves.
COWPER.
CHAPTER CXCII.
MORE OF THE DOCTOR'S PHILOSOPHY, WHICH WILL AND WILL NOT BE LIKED
BY THE LADIES, AND SOME OF THE AUTHOR'S WHICH WILL AND WILL NOT BY
THE GENTLEMEN. THE READER IS INTRODUCED TO COUNT CASTIGLIONE,
AND TO SIR JOHN CHEKE.
L'AUTEUR.
CHAPTER CXCIII.
MASTER THOMAS MACE, AND THE TWO HISTORIANS OF HIS SCIENCE, SIR
JOHN HAWKINS AND DR. BURNEY. SOME ACCOUNT OF THE OLD LUTANIST
AND OF HIS “MUSIC'S MONUMENT.”
CHAPTER CXCIV.
CHAPTER CXCV.
ANOTHER LESSON WITH THE STORY AND MANNER OF ITS PRODUCTION.
CHAPTER CXCVI.
CHAPTER CXCVII.
I find by experience that Writing is like Building, wherein the undertaker, to supply
some defect, or serve some convenience which at first he foresaw not, is usually
forced to exceed his first model and proposal, and many times to double the charge
and expence of it.
DR. JOHN SCOTT.
CHAPTER CXCVIII.
CHAPTER CXCIX.
CHAPTER CC.
A CHAPTER OF KINGS.
FIMBUL-FAMBI heitr
Sá er fatt kann segia,
That er ósnotvrs athal.
INTERCHAPTER XXI.
Le Plebe è bestia
Di cento teste, e non rinchiude in loro
Pur oncia di saper.
CHIABRERA.
INTERCHAPTER XXII.
VARIETY OF STILES.
No man is so foolish, but may give another good counsel sometimes; and no man is
so wise, but may easily err, if he will take no other counsel but his own.
BEN JONSON.
THE DOCTOR,
&c.
CHAPTER CLXXII.
Sir Kenelm Digby went to Holland for the purpose of conversing with
Descartes, who was then living in retirement at Egmont. Speculative
knowledge, Digby said to him, was no doubt a refined and agreeable
pursuit, but it was too uncertain and too useless to be made a man's
occupation, life being so short that one has scarcely time to acquire
well the knowledge of necessary things. It would be far more worthy
of a person like Descartes, he observed, who so well understood the
construction of the human frame, if he would apply himself to
discover means of prolonging its duration, rather than attach himself
to the mere speculation of philosophy. Descartes made answer that
this was a subject on which he had already meditated; that as for
rendering man immortal, it was what he would not venture to
promise, but that he was very sure he could prolong his life to the
standard of the Patriarchs.
This remarkable man was born about the middle of the seventeenth
century and bred to the Law in Lincoln's Inn under Mr. Eyre a very
eminent lawyer of those days. In 1698 he published a treatise with
this title—“Several assertions proved, in order to create another
species of money than Gold and Silver,” and also an “Essay on a
Registry for Titles of Lands.” Both subjects seem to denote that on
these points he was considerably advanced beyond his age. But the
whole strength of his mind was devoted to his profession, in which
he had so completely trammelled and drilled his intellectual powers
that he at length acquired a habit of looking at all subjects in a legal
point of view. He could find flaws in an hereditary title to the crown.
But it was not to seek flaws that he studied the Bible; he studied it to
see whether he could not claim under the Old and New Testament
something more than was considered to be his share. The result of
this examination was that in the year 1700 he published “An
Argument proving that according to the Covenant of Eternal Life
revealed in the Scriptures Man may be translated from hence into
that Eternal Life without passing through death, although the Human
Nature of Christ himself could not be thus translated till he had
passed through death.”
That, the old motto, (says he) worn upon tomb-stones, “Death is the
Gate of Life,” is a lie, by which men decoy one another into death,
taking it to be a thorough-fare into Eternal Life, whereas it is just so
far out of the way. For die when we will, and be buried where we will,
and lie in the grave as long as we will, we must all return from thence
and stand again upon the Earth before we can ascend into the
Heavens. “Hinc itur ad astra.” He admitted that “this custom of the
world to die hath gained such a prevalency over our minds by
prepossessing us of the necessity of death, that it stands ready to
swallow his argument whole without digesting it.” But the dominion of
death, he said, is supported by our fear of it, by which it hath bullied
the world to this day. Yet “the custom of the World to die is no
argument one way or other;” however, because he knew that custom
itself is admitted as an evidence of title, upon presumption that such
custom had once a reasonable commencement and that this reason
doth continue, it was incumbent upon him to answer this Custom by
shewing the time and reason of its commencement and that the
reason was determined.
“The religion of the World now is that Man is born to die. But from the
beginning it was not so, for Man was made to live. God made not
Death till Man brought it upon himself by his delinquency. Adam
stood as fair for Life as Death, and fairer too, because he was in the
actual possession of Life,—as Tenant thereof at the Will of God, and
had an opportunity to have made that title perpetual by the Tree of
Life, which stood before him with the Tree of Knowledge of Good
and Evil. And here 'tis observable how the same act of man is made
the condition both of his life and death: ‘put forth thy hand and pull
and eat and die,’ or ‘put forth thy hand and pull and eat and live for
ever.’ 'Tis not to be conceived that there was any physical virtues in
either of these Trees whereby to cause life or death; but God having
sanctified them by those two different names, he was obliged to
make good his own characters of them, by commanding the whole
Creation to act in such a manner as that Man should feel the effects
of this word, according to which of the Trees he first put forth his
hand. And it is yet more strange, that man having life and death set
before him at the same time and place, and both to be had upon the
same condition, that he should single out his own death and leave
the Tree of Life untouched. And what is further strange, even after
his election of death he had an interval of time before his expulsion
out of Paradise, to have retrieved his fate by putting forth his hand to
the Tree of Life; and yet he omitted this too!
“But by all this it is manifest that as the form or person of man in his
first creation was capable of eternal life without dying, so the fall of
man which happened to him after his creation hath not disabled his
person from that capacity of eternal life. And therefore durst Man
even then have broken through the Cherubim and flaming sword, or
could he now any way come at the Tree of Life, he must yet live for
ever, notwithstanding his sin committed in Paradise and his
expulsion out of it. But this Tree of Life now seems lost to Man; and
so he remains under the curse of that other Tree, ‘in the day that
thou eatest thereof thou shalt die.’ Which sentence of the Law is the
cause of the death of Man, and was the commencement of the
Custom of Death in the World, and by the force of this Law Death
has kept the possession (before admitted) to this day.
“By his act of delinquency and the sentence upon it, Adam stood
attainted and became a dead man in law, though he was not
executed till about nine hundred years afterwards.” Lawyer as Asgill
was, and legally as he conducts his whole extraordinary argument,
he yet offers a moral extenuation of Adam's offence. Eve after her
eating and Adam before his eating, were, he says, in two different
states, she in the state of Death, and he in the State of Life; and
thereby his was much the harder case. For she by her very creation
was so much a part of himself that he could not be happy while she
was miserable. The loss of her happiness so much affected him by
sympathy that all his other enjoyments could do him no good; and
therefore since he thought it impossible for her to return into the
same state with him, he chose, rather than be parted from her, to
hazard himself in the same state with her. Asgill then resumes his
legal view of the case: the offence he says was at last joint and
several; the sentence fell upon Mankind as descendants from these
our common ancestors, and so upon Christ himself. And this is the
reason why in the genealogy of our Saviour as set down by two
Evangelists his legal descent by Joseph is only counted upon,
“because all legal descents are accounted from the father.” As he
was born of a Virgin to preserve his nature from the defilement of
humanity, so was he of a Virgin espoused to derive upon himself the
curse of the Law by a legal father: for which purpose it was
necessary that the birth of Christ should, in the terms of the
Evangelist, be on this wise and no otherwise. And hence the
Genealogy of Christ is a fundamental part of Eternal Life.
The reader will soon perceive that technically as Asgill treated his
strange argument, he was sincerely and even religiously convinced
of its importance and its truth. “Having shewn,” he proceeds, “how
this Law fell upon Christ, it is next incumbent on me to shew that it is
taken away by his death, and consequently that the long possession
of Death over the World can be no longer a title against Life. But
when I say this Law is taken away, I don't mean that the words of it
are taken away; for they remain with us to this day and being matter
of Record must remain for ever; but that it is satisfied by other matter
of Record, by which the force of it is gone. Law satisfied is no Law,
as a debt satisfied is no debt. Now the specific demand of the Law
was Death; and of a man; and a man made under the Law. Christ
qualified himself to be so: and as such suffered under it, thus
undergoing the literal sentence. This he might have done and not
have given the Law satisfaction, for millions of men before him had
undergone it and yet the Law was nevertheless dissatisfied with
them and others, but He declared It is finished before he gave up the
ghost. By the dignity of his person he gave that satisfaction which it
was impossible for mankind to give.”
For the Law, he argues, was not such a civil contract that the breach
of it could be satisfied; it was a Law of Honour, the breach whereof
required personal satisfaction for the greatest affront and the highest
act of ingratitude to God, inasmuch as the slighter the thing
demanded is, the greater is the affront in refusing it. “Man by his very
creation entered into the labours of the Creator and became Lord of
the Universe which was adapted to his enjoyments. God left him in
possession of it upon his parole of honour, only that he would
acknowledge it to be held of Him, and as the token of this tenure that
he would only forbear from eating of one tree, withal telling him that if
he did eat of it, his life should go for it. If man had had more than his
life to give, God would have had it of him. This was rather a
resentment of the affront, than any satisfaction for it; and therefore to
signify the height of this resentment God raises man from the dead
to demand further satisfaction from him. Death is a commitment to
the prison of the Grave till the Judgement of the Great Day; and then
the grand Habeas Corpus will issue to the Earth and to the Sea, to
give up their dead: to remove the Bodies, with the cause of their
commitment.
“Yet was this a resentment without malice; for as God maintained his
resentment under all his love, so He maintained his love under all his
resentment. For his love being a love of kindness flowing from his
own nature, could not be diminished by any act of man; and yet his
honour being concerned to maintain the truth of his word, he could
not falsify that to gratify his own affection. And thus he bore the
passion of his own love, till he had found out a salvo for his honour
by that Son of Man who gave him satisfaction at once by the dignity
of his person. Personal satisfactions by the Laws of Honour are
esteemed sufficient or not, according to the equality or inequality
between the persons who give or take the affront. Therefore God to
vindicate his honour was obliged to find out a person for this purpose
equal to Himself: the invention of which is called the manifold
wisdom of God, the invention itself being the highest expression of
the deepest love, and the execution of it, in the death of Christ, the
deepest resentment of the highest affront.