SCIENTIFIC WRITING GROUP WORK

Receptive skill - Listening

Topic - The importance of listening to the voice of the learner

Key words - Student perspective, Learner-centered approach, Student voice, Educational

assessment, Student engagement, Teaching effectiveness, Pedagogical research.

PDF Link - https://wje.org.nz/index.php/WJE/article/view/334

The general reasons why the article is a scientific piece of writing. Is it the result of a
scientific research?

The article is a scientific text because it presents the results of research that examined
primary school children's perceptions of their learning in health education. Among the
general reasons is that the text is registered to be published, it is published in a scientific
journal, and it follows a standard format.

It is a scientific investigation because it presents a typical structure of a scientific

research report, which includes an introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and
conclusions.

Does the article fulfill the characteristics of a scientific text? Why?

Yes, the article meets several characteristics of a scientific text. Firstly, it is clear and
concise, as it presents the results of a research study on primary school children's
perceptions of health education in an organized and structured manner. Additionally, it is
objective, as it is based on collected data and presents the children's opinions without
distortion. It is also easy to read and understand; the article uses clear and accessible
language, making it easier for the reader to comprehend the results and conclusions.

Does the article have the characteristics of a good or successful paper? Support you
answer.

Yes, this scientific article possesses the characteristics of a good or successful paper
because:

- Presents an accurate account of the investigation: The article offers a comprehensive

overview of the research study, encompassing its objectives, methodology, findings, and
implications. It faithfully represents the data collected and analyzed during the study.

- Has logical flow, is clearly written and easily understandable: The article follows a
coherent structure, with sections devoted to the introduction, methodology, findings,
discussion, and conclusion. The language employed is clear and accessible, aiding reader
comprehension.

- Follows a particular style of discipline: The paper adheres to the stylistic norms typical of
academic research articles in the fields of education and health sciences. It employs
appropriate terminology and references relevant literature to contextualize the study
within existing scholarship.
- Is free from popular jargon and local slang, instead uses scientific terms: The language
utilized in the article is scholarly and eschews popular jargon or slang. It em ploys
scientific terminology pertinent to the subject matter of health education research.

-Has appropriate and adequate illustrations: The article incorporates suitable illustrations
in the form of tables and figures to complement the text. These visuals aid in conveying
key findings and enhancing presentation clarity.

- Does not contain plagiarized information: There is no indication of plagiarized content in

the article. The author appropriately cites sources and references existing literature in
accordance with academic integrity standards.

- Contains original results: The findings presented in the article are original and derive
from the data gathered through the author's research study. The paper offers novel
insights into children's perspectives on health education, showcasing the research's
originality.

Find examples of the principles of scientific writing. Explain them.

Objectivity: The author maintains objectivity throughout the text by presenting the
research findings and interpretations without bias. For example, when discussing
children's sources of health knowledge, the author cites statistics without injecting
personal opinions or emotions into the narrative.

Precision: The author uses precise language to convey specific information, such as when
describing the methodology used in the study. Terms like "mixed methods" and
"participatory techniques" are clearly defined, ensuring the reader understands the
research approach.

Clarity: The writing is clear and organized, making it easy for the reader to follow the flow
of ideas. Each section, from the introduction to the discussion, is clearly delineated, and
subheadings help to break down complex topics into manageable sections.

Efficiency: The text efficiently communicates the key findings and implications of the
research. Rather than being verbose, the author concisely summarizes the main themes
and conclusions, allowing the reader to grasp the essential points without unnecessary
repetition or elaboration.

Find five examples of scientific vocabulary.

Curriculum design

Societal knowledge

Competent reporters

Sophisticated knowledge

Consultative processes
Which is the most useful information you found in the article?

The most useful information found in the article is the emphasis on the importance of
listening to children's voices and perspectives regarding their own learning and health
education. The study highlights how children possess valuable insights and opinions
about health issues that should be taken into consideration when designing health
education programs. This includes understanding where children acquire their health
knowledge, their concerns about health, and what they believe they should be learning in
health education. By actively listening to children and involving them in the curriculum
development process, educators can create more relevant and effective health education
programs that address the real needs and interests of children.

Is there anything new, different from previous papers?

Emphasis on Children's Voices: The paper underscores the importance of listening to

children's perspectives on health education, challenging historical notions that
positioned children as passive recipients of adult knowledge. This emphasis on children's
voices reflects a shift in paradigms, acknowledging children as competent reporters of
their own experiences.

Desired Areas of Learning: Both younger and older children express a desire to learn more
about drugs, alcohol, smoking, body image, sexual health, and emotional well-being.
Their preferences highlight the need for comprehensive health education that addresses
diverse topics relevant to children's lives.

Could you use this article for the theoretical foundations of a research of your own?
Why?

Yes, this article could serve as a valuable theoretical foundation for a research project. It
provides insights into the perceptions and knowledge of primary school-aged children
regarding health education. The study discussed in the article utilized mixed methods to
gather data. Furthermore, the findings of the study suggest several potential research
directions. For example, exploring the effectiveness of different health education
approaches based on children's feedback, investigating the sources of health knowledge
among children in different cultural contexts, or examining the impact of age and maturity
on children's understanding of health issues.

How could you refer to this article? Write an example paragraph.

This article delves into the significance of listening to the voices of primary school-aged
children regarding health education. Historically, children were seen as passive recipients
of adult knowledge, but this study highlights the importance of acknowledging children as
competent individuals with valuable insights. This study reveals children's existing health
knowledge, concerns, and preferences for health education content. Through this
research, it becomes evident that children possess substantial knowledge about health
issues and deserve a participatory role in shaping their learning experiences.