AR 5 ● Successfully addresses all content 5 ● Ideas are structured logically 5 ● No vocabulary errors or very 5 ● No grammar errors or very few elements of the task throughout all paragraphs few vocabulary errors which do grammar errors which do not ● No irrelevant information ● Skillfully manages paragraphing not impede comprehension impede comprehension ● Presents a clear stance, and main ● Paragraphs and sentences are ● Uses a wide range of ● Punctuation is almost always ideas are expressed clearly with clearly linked using a variety of appropriate vocabulary to accurate. well supported examples and appropriate linkers, conjunctions, convey precise meanings ● Both simple and complex details and reference words ● Spelling and capitalization is grammatical forms are used almost almost always accurate always correctly
4 PERFORMANCE SHARES FEATURES OF
BANDS 3 AND 5 3 ● Addresses some content 3 ● Ideas are sometimes structured in 3 ● Some errors in vocabulary, but 3 ● Some errors in grammar, but elements of the task successfully a logical order they rarely impede they rarely impede ● Some irrelevant information ● Uses paragraphing, but not always comprehension comprehension ● Presents a clear stance and correctly ● Uses common and rare ● Some punctuation errors relevant main ideas, but some ● Paragraphs and sentences are vocabulary appropriately but ● Generally good control of simple parts may be inadequately sometimes clearly linked using with some inaccuracy grammatical forms but frequent developed or unclear or repetitive appropriate linkers, conjunctions, and ● Some spelling or/and capitalization errors with complex ones reference words though may be errors repetitive
2 PERFORMANCE SHARES FEATURES OF
BANDS 1 AND 3 1 ● Barely addresses content 1 ● Most ideas lack coherence and 1 ● Frequent vocabulary errors which 1 ● Most sentences contain grammar elements of the task do not progress logically impede comprehension mistakes that impede ● Mostly irrelevant information ● No paragraphing ● Uses only basic vocabulary which comprehension ● Fails to present a clear stance ● Sentences are not linked using may be repetitive or inappropriate ● Frequent punctuation errors and main ideas; there is no appropriate linkers, conjunctions, for the task ● Almost no control of simple and development and too much and reference words ● Frequent spelling and capitalization complex grammatical forms repetition errors • If a student's first draft is exceptionally strong, there is no need to require them to write a second draft. Simply grade the paper using the rubric and share the grade with the student. • If a student refuses to write the second draft, grade the first draft. Grade the paper using the rubric and deduct 10 points from the total grade. • If students refuse to correct their mistakes considering your feedback on their first drafts, and resubmit the same paper, grade the paper using the rubric and deduct 10 points from the total grade.