See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/261203134

Role of de Broglie waves on origination of non-linear phenomena in torsion field

and spin-to-spin interaction experiments

Conference Paper · May 2013

DOI: 10.1109/LISAT.2013.6578248

CITATIONS READS

3 526

2 authors, including:

Mark Krinker
New York City College of Technology
34 PUBLICATIONS 52 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Mark Krinker on 28 January 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Role of de Broglie Waves
On Origination of Non-Linear Phenomena in Torsion Field
and Spin-to-Spin Interaction Experiments
Mark Krinker, Aron Goykadosh
New York City College of Technology
Department of Electrical and
Abstract— “Nature is reach in examples of nonlinear behavior. It
turns out that nonlinearity is the rule rather than the exception;
the world must be described mathematically by equations that
exhibit critical points and novel orders of behavior and cannot
always be analyzed or decomposed into simpler forms. F. David
Peat, SYNCRONICITY
Plenty of experimental facts of non-linear phenomena in the
experiments related to spinning/rotational processes have been
accumulated thus far. Universality of all spin–related
processes, disregarding the carrier of the process – either
mechanical, electrical or others, enable us to discuss them as
one group, based on Torsion Field Hypothesis, theoretically
introduced back in 20s of the past Century. Since 70’s there
have been a lot of experiments with non-electromagnetic fields
which revealed their specific nonlinear behavior.
In particular, a very strange property of these kinds of the
experiments has been noted - first measurements phenomena -
where the results of the first measurements look more
convincing than their repetitions. Another remarkable
manifestation of this class of phenomena was the Triad Effect
noted first in Russia in torsion-related experiments. The Triad
effect is: the observation of incoming non-electromagnetic
event can occur before the event itself was initiated as well
as some time after the real event took place.
The authors discuss the origination of this class of phenomena
with regards to quantum phenomena, including superposition
of de Broglie waves.
I. INTRODUCTION
Nonlinearity is encountered frequently in a macro-world.
Generally, nonlinearity is a property of events where cause and
effect are not proportional to each other. Water is a well-
known example of nonlinear behavior: even insignificant
additives or external events can provoke changes in its various
substructures and properties. This is due to universal spinning
processes, irrelevant of the carrier – mechanical, electrical…
the roots of this phenomenon is associated with Torsion Fields,
TF, as a universal agent of any rotation and spinning.
Although majority of scientists are still skeptical about TF, this
concept gradually is gaining more followers. TF detection
Telecommunication Engineering Technology
CUNY, New York
Agoykadosh@citytech.cuny.edu
employs special instruments, where features of nonlinearity
manifest themselves in the utmost way.
There is a new class of electromagnetic-based instruments
which have unusual capabilities to interact with traces of an
object which is not at a site of measurement, and communicate
to each other over distances where electromagnetic signal has a
noise level, as well as developing an object-correlated output
signal even before the object was activated or after its
activation is over, and demonstrate other phenomena
contradicting with a classical electromagnetic cause-effect
paradigm.
The operation of the instruments is based on non-linear
quantum phenomena as well as properties of Physical Vacuum
[1].
1. Role of De Broglie Waves in New Measurements
Technology
Back in 90’s, one of the first instruments of Geomagnetic
Anomalies Meter was developed by Russian inventor Yurij
Kravchenko [2], the instrument was called IGA-1 Indeed,
IGA-1 can measure fields over geo-faults, detect pipe-lines and
do other similar work. In addition, the instrument can register a
phantom of an object, and develop a signal which correlates
with celestial events like eclipses, full Moon and other events
of this type. Although the operation of the instrument within 5-
15 kHz band is based on measuring the point-to-point phase
shift of electric field induced by corresponding Earth field, the
same basis allows measuring non-linear quantum phenomena
like phantoms. This raised the question of what is being
measured by this class of instruments.
An important hint of this came when Y. Kravchenko noted
that polishing a metal sensor-electrode of his instrument
increases its sensitivity and stability of operation.
Another important moment was a report of V. Shkatov, who
established an unusual fact of elaboration of an object by his
series of instruments. He reported a speed of elaboration as 1-3
mm/s [3].
 The third important moment was experiments of L. Kish
who raised a question about possible variation of a mass of
information carriers depending on the volume of imprinted
information [19], however not firmly proved.
Speaking of Kravchenko’s finding, it has to be said that
polishing electrodes of electrometric high-impedance
instruments are known to reduce the leakage of nano-amps
currents. But in this case, the polishing revealed the clue to a
principally new effect.
This effect is definitely nonlinear at least due to the fact that
polishing is an attribute of the optical band, while the
instrument operates at kHz frequencies.
Combination of these factors allowed the author to suppose
that what is measured by all of these instruments is de
Broglie waves [4].
Indeed, the improvement of reflecting properties says about
~ 1mkm involved wave.
De Broglie wave is not a simple formality, but it is a
manifestation of some physical presence at its crests.
h h
Taking the de Broglie’s wavelength    into
p mv
consideration, with the speed v, known from Shkatov’s
experiments, an equivalent mass of the probing field can be
estimated. For   106 m , we get
mv  6.6  1028 kgms1 , at v  103 ms 1 , the mass
25
equals, m  6.6  10 kg . According to E  mc , such the
2
8
mass corresponds to 6.0  10 J of energy.
What can furnish such a value of the probing field?
It must be mentioned that human’s own electric field is
compatible to that produced by Earth. Contribution of each of
them into this model has to be estimated separately.
We can estimate just Earth’s field, while keeping in a mind
that human body can produce the qualitatively similar effect.
Let’s estimate the Earth’s field as a possible candidate for
a probe. Taking low frequency field as ~ 100V / m , we get
the field E density of w  107 J / m3 according to
w   0E 2 . The volume occupied by the probing field is
6.0  108 J / 107 J / m3  0.6m3 . This volume matches a
space, totally occupied by a measuring instrument, an object
and a human body. Conversely, this value matches the average
volume occupied by a human aura. Moreover, it supports the
Shkatov’s concept of Torsion field feedback loop: involvement
of an operator as an active component of a measuring system
as an object-operator-instrument-object loop. If we take
6.0  108 J calculated above as an energy accumulated in
one cubical meter of mutual operator-instrument-object space,
we get the calculated above on a base of the concept of de
Broglie wave and the speed of mutual interaction between
instrument and object as ~ 103 m / s (revealed by V.T .
Shkatov), then we get the field strength E  0.8  10 V / m .
2
Once again, this value of the field corresponds both to that of
Earth at low frequencies as well as produced by a human body.
We see that concept of de Broglie wave based on mentioned
above experimental findings brings to real physical values
involved in this class of measurement processes.
It has to be stressed here, that the discussed above de
Broglie wave is a wave of the combined object-operator-
instrument system.
2. Shkatov’s Triads and de Broglie’s waives. Role of
Corpuscular-Wave Dualism
Phenomenon of Triad was first noted few years ago in
experiments of Shkatov with his torsi-meters [6].
The essence of the triad is that some arbitrary event, generated
during and at certain time, gets two additional twin-readings,
shifted in time and space in a symmetrical way.
Therefore, there are both spatial and time manifestations of the
Triad.
The authors of the current publication believe that this
phenomenon is a superposition of de Broglie’s waves of the
studied object and the instrument with their interference,
the interference conception envisages having more than
three events. Their observation depends on sensitivity of
special measurement instruments.
Both forwarding and delayed action of the triad can be
explained in terms of interference.
Any originated object produces de Broglie’s wave which
occupy surrounding space.
It’s important to take into account that the distance
between maximums and minimums in interference fringe
can drastically exceed the original wavelength at large
distances of observation.
The de Broglie wave is described with the Schroedinger
equation. The probability-related wave function  actually
contains an interference-like paradigm in it. Its’ one-
dimensional presentation is
p E  p E 
x.t   cos x  t   i sin x  t   ei  px Et  / 
     
(1)
Here p, x and E are linear momentum, coordinate and the
energy of a free quazi-particle considered above. Having the
objects interacting, like in the object-operator-instrument-
object loop, we have the common wave function of the system
as a product of its initial wave functions:
system  12 3 (2)

As it follows from (1) this combined function (2) is relatively
complex and comprises their combined frequencies as sums
and differences of them. Model below explains origination of
the spatial triad.
Spatial Triads can be explained as interference of de
Broglie waves. The optical interference mechanism is
applicable here. Fig.1 illustrates Young’s fringes calculation
for monochromatic waves, which is an analog of superposition
of de Broglie waves in nonlinear phenomena.
Fig.1. On calculation of allocation of interference fringes as an
analog of superposition of
de Broglie waves in nonlinear phenomena
Variation of intensity I along Y direction on a screen can be
found as:
  2d   
I  y   2 I 0 1  cos   y   (3)
   l   
Slots S1 and S2 play the role of sources of de Broglie waves,
formula (3) shows that, in spite of very short , the distance
between maximums along y-direction can be considerable.
Fig.1 illustrates that at =1.0e-6 m, d=1.0e-3 m and l=1 m. We
don’t forget that de Broglie waves are also called matter
waves and their crests mean presence of a matter there. This
is some idealization of course, because in reality this is an
interference of unequal wavelengths and the picture will be
more blurry.
Fig.2. Illustration to explanation of space-Triad: distance
between extremes of interference fringe can drastically exceed
the original wavelength at large distance of observation. In this
example
=1.0e-6 m, d=1.0e-3 m and l=1 m according to Fig.1.
Therefore, the model above explains origination of Shkatov’s
spatial Triads as an interference of de Broglie waves on an
anthrop-compatible scale.
The time-Triads can be explained in the following way:
Any object manifests itself in the world with its de Broglie
wave and the related wave function since the moment the
object appears. Let suppose, we have two independent objects,
a receiver and a transmitter on a time axis, Fig.3. At the
moment “0” they start to interact with each other. Before “0”
moment they interact like waves: interference of their wave
functions and de Broglie waves like it’s shown above. Since
the moment “0” they are the whole system with a minimal
uncertainty t of time and that for x of space. So, since this
very moment they behave themselves like a particle. However,
the experimenters see their interaction as waves before the
energizing the transmitter. This is nothing but a signal of
interaction of their de Broglie waves, which exist irrelevant of
the transmitter being turned on or off . At the “0” moment the
direct communication begins, they behave themselves like a
particle and the receiver records the signal from the
transmitter. After de-energizing the transmitter they again
behave themselves like interfering de Broglie waves and the
receiver gets the third signal as a manifestation of interference
crest of their mutual wave function.
We have to stress here that the interference fringe of the
transmitter and receiver is not a stable picture because of
evolution of each of them, which results in variation of .
But, by this reason, the interference fringes become moving
in time, which is very important for our explanation.
Fig.3. Origination of the Time Triad on a base of Corpuscular-
Wave Dualism
3. Quantum Entanglement and Spin-to-Spin Interactions in
Nonlinear Processes
The Quantum Entanglement, QE, is a considerable
component in explanation of discussed phenomena. Question
on QE was raised in 1935 in EPR (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen)
thoughtful experiment. A. Aspect’s experiment with correlated
photons (1982) was one of the dramatic manifestations of QE
[7].
QE is not just a prerogative of micro objects. As [8] shows,
this behavior can be seen in macroscopic systems.
QE is a very important component of the coming new
technology: Torsion Field Communications.
This coming technology uses very unusual technique to
connect receiver and transmitter in non-electromagnetic way:
image-assisted addressing. This approach was declared in [5].
Participants of such experiments use at least one photographic
image let’s say the image of a transmitter located in immediate
vicinity of the receiver, next to its sensor.
It is believed that spin-to-spin interaction plays a
considerable role in this process due to QE phenomenon
between a transmitter and its image, carrying imprinted
information about the transmitter. Even remote image of an
object still has connections with the original due to spin-to-spin
interaction on a base of QE phenomenon.
The great contribution in studying spin-to-spin interaction
was done by Russian scientist A.V. Bobrov [9]. In particular,
he showed a possibility to record spin-to-spin interaction with
electric double layers [10]. Another great achievement of this
scientist is that he first discovered a non-electromagnetic
component in a laser and light-emitting diodes radiation [11].
The experiments with electric double layers as sensors of TF
were successfully repeated by other researcher in a rather
fundamental work [12]. As all similar studies, this research is
profuse with nonlinear effects.
In nonlinear manifestations, relation between the operator
and instrument on one side and the object on other side can be
explained due to the quantum entanglement. The pilot Torsion
Field communication sessions, TFC, practiced recently by
second-physics.ru group, are also prevailing examples of the
nonlinear processes.
4. Torsion Field Communication Sessions
Fig.4 shows first torsion communication session [13].
The torsion transmitter by V. Zamsha, Pert, Australia, sent a
special torsion signal at 13:30 GMT to Tomsk, Siberia, Russia
on 5.22.2011. Reception of the major signal is clearly seen at
13:30 GMT as an output signal of V.Shkatov’s torsion receiver
OREOL-1-1. After V. Zamsha’s transmitter was turned off at
15:00 GMT, we see kind of a “ghost” signal between 16:30-
17:30 GMT. This nonlinear phenomenon corresponds to
processes considered above.
Приём первой"торсионной посылки" из Австралии, 22.05.11. Приёмник ОРЕОЛ-1-1
7,5
Момент включения устройства В.Замши, 13:00:00 GMT
7
6,5
6
Величина, кГц
5,5
5
4,5
4
3,5
3
11 11, 12 12, 13 13, 14 14, 15 15, 16 16, 17 17, 18 18, 19 19, 20 20, 21 21, 22 22, 23 23, 24
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Время мировое, час
Fig.4 First “torsion parcel” from Australia, Pert, sent by V.
Zamsha to V. Shkatov, Russia, Tomsk on 5.22.2011. OREOL-
1-1 receiver, by V. Shkatov, recorded this session. Horizontal
axis- GMT, vertical axis – frequency kHz function of the
output. The original image was courteously furnished by V.
Shkatov and V. Zamsha.
The next TF communication session was conducted
between New York City, USA and city of Tomsk, Siberia,
Russia on 6.23.2011 [13,14]. The distance between them is
about 9300 km along the earth’s chord.
Two-cells spinning field transmitter, M. Krinker, New
York, is shown in Fig.5. The transmitter develops 3 MHz, 400
V/m spinning, having opposite sign in left and right cells.
Conception of spinning fields as field gyroscopes was
developed in [15,16]
Two very important moments of this session have to be
stressed:
1. AM modulated signal (1 kHz, 30%) was used in this
session in NY. Modulation develops a non-stationary
rotation, causing most profound space-time effects.
The conception of non-stationary rotation for
observation space-time effects was introduced by
N.A. Kozyrev for mechanical gyroscopes [17] and
transferred later by M. Krinker for the field
gyroscopes [15,16].
2. The long axis of spinning field generators, shown
above, was directed to Tomsk, along the Earth’s
chord, according to their geographic coordinates.
Reception of TF signal in city of Tomsk was performed by
V.T Shkatov with his torsion receiver OREOL-001-1 in
automated mode, in the sealed laboratory. The output of this
instrument is a frequency, related to torsion field at site of
reception.
The major detail of the protocol was that the image of the
NY transmitter was used for addressing: the picture was sent
(via Internet) to V.T. Shkatov, who directed a laser beam of the
probe of his receiver along a vertical axis on the image of the
transmitter. It has to be mentioned here that a non-
electromagnetic component of a laser beam was discovered
earlier by A.V. Bobrov and perhaps its torsion nature makes
this probing images possible.
Fig.5. Two-cells Torsion transmitter on a base of spinning
electric fields, employed in the in New York-Tomsk
communication session. Its image, placed next to the receiver
in Tomsk and probed with a laser probe, was used to entangle
wave functions of the transmitter and receiver for establishing
remote connection between them.
Fig.6. Panoramic record of New York-Tomsk TF
communication session. V. Shkatov’s TF receiver was turned
on before the experiment and left energized after the session,
marked with green, white and red dots. This allowed recording
some unexpected events before and after the session. The
black arrows show NY time when M. Krinker came and left
the laboratory. This exactly matches bends on the remote
diagram. The TF transmitter in New-York was de-energized at
that time. The original image was courteously furnished by
V.T Shkatov and edited in English by M. Krinker.
Fig.7. Correlated signal of New-York Tomsk communication
session. According to the initial protocol, TF transmitter had to
be turned on in New-York at 14:00 GMT. However, moved by
a worry about technical condition of the transmitter, M.
Krinker prematurely turned it on for few minutes somewhere
between 13:30-13:50 GMT. This event left an imprint on the
record. The original image was courteously furnished by V.T
Shkatov and edited in English by M. Krinker.
According to a mutual protocol of the session, Spinning Field
transmitter had to be turn on in New-York at 14:00 GMT, June
23, 2011. The sequence of the transmission: 14:00-14:10 –
right spinning cell, 14:10-14:20 –pause, 14:20-14:30 – left
spinning cell.
The protocol was partially violated by M. Krinker who,
moved by a worry about technical condition of the transmitter,
turned it on for a short time of 3 minutes somewhere between
13:30-13:50 to see an ellipse of the spinning on a screen of the
oscilloscope and then turned it off. Then everything was done
according to the protocol.
The record of the session was sent to M. Krinker by V.T.
Shkatov few days later.
The analysis of the diagram revealed very dramatic example of
nonlinear events in this communication session, Fig.6. The
bend at 11:45 GMT (7:45 NY) exactly corresponds to coming
M. Krinker to the office with the de-energized transmitter. The
second bend at and a spike at 13:30 GMT, Figs.6 and 7
correspond to premature powering the transmitter. An interval
between 14:00-14:30 GMT, marked between green and red
dots in Fig.6, exactly corresponds to the protocol of
communication. Detailed analysis of the output signal of
transmitter was done by V.T Shkatov in Fig.7. It clearly shows
a spike at 13:30 GMT (premature powering the transmitter). It
is also notable, that after the pause P, activating the left
spinning develops a new band on the diagram. At 13:30 GMT
the transmitter was off, but looking at Fig.6 we see that leaving
the office by the experimenter at 20:45 GMT (16:45 NY)
causes the new bend on the diagram.
From here we see some correlation of events related to de-
energized transmitter that looks pretty unrealistic. On the other
hand, experimental facts of stable remaining spinning after
removal torsion field generators were observed back in 2006
by one of the authors.
It has to be added, that experiments on Torsion
communication are in progress inside second-physics group,
www.second-physics.ru . New torsion sessions brought
convincing results of feasibility of this technology as well as
demonstrated a great potential of nonlinear effects. In
particular, experiments on torsion communication between
Australia and Russia, continued by V. Shkatov and V. Zamsha
demonstrated phenomenon of a distant psycho-kinesis,
performed on a base of image-assisted addressing with a light
wooden frame: rotation of the light frame in Tomsk was
controlled by the operator in Australia. They report rotation of
the frame in Tomsk up to 190 degrees for 230 seconds under
action from Australia [18]. The video of this experiment was
demonstrated on the Conference.
5. Torsion Reception and SEVA-Technology
Spinning Electric Vector Analyzer, SEVA, by M. Krinker,
was successfully employed as a receiver in TF communication
sessions in 2011. The results of employing SEVA as receiver
for TF communication are being processed and will be
published later.
SEVA is a first instrument where electric spinning was
declared as a major purpose of the measurement.
Based on relation of all spinning processes, electric spinning
is a good representative of TF processes. The experiments
show that spinning can seriously influence space-time
processes [20]. Electromagnetic spinning and related TF
always accompany cosmic processes. In particular, SEVA was
employed for observation of celestial events like Full Moon
and Lunar Eclipse [21].
In all SEVA-related publications, a role of modulation is
specially stressed.
The modulation is a way to develop non-stationary process.
Namely non-stationary was stressed by N.A. Kozyrev as a
major condition to achieve space-time variation effects. This is
applicable to field gyroscope. The modulation, being a
nonlinear process, develops origination of field gyroscopes,
causing a chain of considerable nonlinear effects. Fig.8. shows
electromagnetic spinning in vicinity of the antenna produced
by non-modulated RF-generator (left), and that for the same
carrier, amplitude-modulated (1 kHz, 30%). It has to be said,
that there actually was no difference between background
spinning in the room and that for non-modulated signal [22].
Fig.8. Left- Background electromagnetic spinning in a room.
Right - Modulation-developed electromagnetic spinning.
Conclusions
1. De Broglie waves, also known as matter waves, are
shown as a physical mechanism, explaining operation
of new class of nonlinear instruments, sensitive to
fundamental events.
References
[1] http://www.eioba.com/a/1tzs/torsion-fields-
theory-of-physical-vacuum-shipov-and-heim
[2] Andreev A.A., Zhigalov V.A., Kravchenko Y.P.,
Krinker M., What Do IGA-1 and Its Analogs
Detect? Effects and Hypotheses. Torsion Fields
2. Operation of this new class of instruments is
associated with Torsion Fields as a universal agent of
any spinning/rotational process, no matter what is a
physical nature of the carrier is: mechanical, electrical
and so on.
3. Triad phenomenon, discovered by V.T. Shkatov, has
its spatial and time manifestation. In the first case, the
instrument detects presence of the object at site of its
physical absence, usually measured by fraction of a
meter from the real object on both sides of it. For
time-Triads, the events manifest themselves 3 times:
before they really occur, at the time of real origination
and some time after they vanish. (This should not be
confused with particular case of Electric Precursors of
an earthquake however Triads are sensitive to them as
well).
4. The spatial-Triad is explained in this paper as an
interference of de Broglie waves. An observer, having
a special instrument, sees a phantom of the object on
its left and right.
5. The time-Triad is explained here on a base of
Corpuscular-Wave dualism: since the moment any
objects origin, they are interrelated with de Broglie
waves and both behave like a wave in their
interaction. The natural evolution of the wavelength
makes the interference fringe moving in time.
Receiver and transmitter are actually connected since
the moment they origin. The time uncertainty of their
interaction t is maximal. At the moment the
receiver is turned on, (while the transmitter is off), it
receives a wave signal of their earlier interaction like
a signal from future. This is a first element of time-
Triad. When the transmitter is turned on, no more
uncertainty t of time of their interaction, t=0,
and they are one particle since now on. The
transmitter receives a real signal, which is a second
element of the time-Triad. When the transmitter is
off again, (with the energized receiver), the systems is
a wave again, and this time the receiver gets one more
signal of their previous wave interaction –the third
element of Triad.
6. TF communication sessions were successfully
conducted between Australia and Russia and USA
and Russia. The session revealed nonlinear Triad
related effects.
7. Spin-to-spin interaction and quantum entanglement
take active participation in TF communication as a
base of image-assisted addressing. Both the spin-to-
spin interaction and the quantum entanglement can be
explained with interference of de Broglie waives.
and Informational Interactions-2010. International
Conference. The Collection, pp.50-69. Tambov,
2010. (Russian)
[3] Shkatov V.T. Letters to http:/www.second-
physics.ru
 [4] Krinker M., Role of de Broglie waves in our
measurements. Letters to www.second-physics.ru,
July 2010.
[5] Shkatov V.T., Russian Patent No. 22011333,
Priority of 09.30.1999.
[6] Shkatov V.T., Report to http:/www.second-
physics.ru , 2011.
[7] Goswami A., The Self-Aware Universe, p.117,
Penguin Putnam Inc, New York, 1993
[8] Vlatko Vedral, Quantifying Entanglement in
Macroscopic Systems, Nature, vol.453, June 19,
2008, pp.1004-1007.
[9] Bobrov A.V. Solenoid Magnetic Field Interaction
with Spin Fields of Material Objects, Torsion
Fields and Informational Interactions-2010.
International Conference. The Collection, pp.21-
25, Tambov, 2010. (Russian)
[10] Bobrov A.V. Properties of Informational Fields,
Bio-Field Interactions and Medical Technologies,
International Conference, Collection, Moscow
2008, pp. 102-106. (Russian)
[11] Bobrov A.V., Physical Base of Informational
Therapy Mechanisms, Bio-Field Interactions and
Medical Technologies, International Conference,
Collection, Moscow 2008, pp. 102-106. (Russian)
[12] Serge Kernbach, Replication Attempt: Measuring
Water Conductivity with Polarized Electrodes,
Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 27, No. 1,
pp. 69–105, 2013
[13] Gorokhov E., Zamsha V.,Krinker M., Shkatov V.,
About Possible Influence of External
Consciousness on Structure of Signals Received
with Technical Thin Field Receivers. New in
UFO-logy and Energy-Informational Interaction.
UFO-2011 International Conference. Moscow,
10.22.2011. (Russian)
View publication stats
[14] M. Krinker, V. Shkatov, Excerption on T-
Communication New-York Session of 6.23.2011,
Sent by V.T. Shkatov to www.second-physics.ru
[15] M. Krinker, Spinning Electric Vector Analyzer,
SEVA. Theory of Operation and Experimental
Test. Bio-Physical Method. International
Symposium. Moscow 2008, pp.5-31.
[16] M. Krinker, Spinning Electric Field as a Virtual
Gyroscope: On Possibility of Existence of
Kozyrev’s Effect in Spinning Fields. Radio-
Physics of Bio-active Radiations, Moscow 2006,
pp. 9-25.
[17] Kozyrev N.A. "On the possibility of experimental
investigation of the properties of time." //Time in
science and philosophy, Prague, 1971, p.111-132.
[18] Shkatov V., Zamsha V., Intercontinental Thin-
Field Communication and Control Experiments
Between Cities of Pert (Australia) and Tomsk
(Russia), Torsion Fields and Informational
Interactions-2012, Moscow, pp.115-125.
[19] L. B. Kish,
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0805/0805.4175.pdf
[20] Krinker M, Goykadosh A, Kitaichik F, Spinning-
Electric Field Induced Changes in Statistics of
Background Gamma-Radiation. Cumulative
Aftereffect in the Detector. Torsion Fields and
Informational Interactions-2010, International
Conference, Tambov, pp.90-94.
[21] M. Krinker, Spinning Process Based Info-Sensors,
Torsion Fields and Informational Interactions-
2012, International Conference, Moscow, pp.223-
228.
[22] M. Krinker. Modulation-Developed
Electromagnetic Spinning,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/124692863/Modulatio
n-Developed-Electromagnetic-Spinning