Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos, while others think that zoos

are both entertaining and ecologically important. Discuss both views.

There are diffirent view about whether people should keep animal in zoos. While some believe
that this action could be wrong and bring negative effects, others think that zoos can be served
for entertainment and ecological purposes. I am going to discuss these views and give my own
opinions.

Body 1. this action could be wrong and bring negative effects

-being kept for a long time in the artificate natural could lead to a lack of basic skills and habits
in the wild animals. Carnivores, for example, used to hunt prays to eat and fight whit each other
to find the leader, but being in the zoo makes them forgets these things. They do not have
chances to experience normal life with fresh air and large area. This could also result in some
deseases due to being isolated and limited movements.

Body 2. zoos can be served for entertainment and ecological purposes.

There is an irrefutable fact that several types of animals are being extinted and keeping them in
zoos is one of the ways to preserve these species. Besides, wild animals are also neccesary in
study and research. By doing this, scientists could find way to reserve genes of these species or
create medicines suitable for them. Not only for ecological purposes, caging them can also
contribute to entertain people. Not all children have opportunities to get close to the nature and
see wild animal in real life, so zoos can help them to do it. To some extent, it is also about
education purposes.

Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can
governments do to address these problems? What can individuals do to help?

Nowadays, humankind is suffering from catastrophic natural disasters, and human impacts are
the reasons that affect directly this phenomenon. Several solutions should be adopted by the
governments and individuals to improve the situation.

There are two main ways that people are damaging the environment. First, people used to use
plastic products and throw them away instead of recycling or reusing which is one of the causes
of climate change. In some research, scientists found that it takes more than 500 to 1000 years
to decompose plastics. Another research also estimated that each year, about 300 million
tonnes of plastic waste are dumped into the environment. And, undoubtedly, if this phenomenon
continues without any prevention, the earth will no longer become a huge landfill. Second, due
to accommodation shortages and the need for wood products, more and more forests have
been destroyed to build houses and exploit wood. This not only threatens natural habitats but
also increases the risk of air pollution. For example, the Amazon rainforest is affected
significantly by deforestation and the result remains nowadays.

Some solutions should be taken to tackle this problem. The government should organize more
campaigns to raise individual awareness of environmental issues and create laws to encourage
residents to practice the 3Rs: Reduce, reuse, and recycle. Additionally, laws about logging trees
need to be implemented strictly to prevent illegal exploitation. Individuals, have to take
responsibility for their actions, and their behaviors that are related to nature. Finally, inhabitants
could also take part in volunteer works like picking trash on the beach or planting trees that can
bring positive to the community and the environment.
In conclusion, although some of the ways people do are negatively impact on the environment,
the government and individuals should take steps to mitigate potential problems.

Mỗi môn nên có số lg hs nam nữ = nhau. Đồng ý?

Imposible, unrealistic: it is impractical to have the equal number of boy and girl not only in any
subject but also in the school. Since the proportion of gender is depended on the number of
applications that school received. If school tries to fill their courses with the equal number of
male and female, it would need to have enough applications of each gender. But in reality, there
are several university subjects that attact more students in one gender than the other, so it is
imposible to have the same proportion of two genders. Nursing courses, for example, tends to
be more popular with females than males, so it would be difficult to balance the number of
students with boys accounting for 50%.

Besides, it is also unfair to base admission on gender but not merit. As insitutions should still
take into considerable the acedemic performance of students to recruit them instead of to fullfill
the gender proportion. Therefore, they can have the same education opportunities and know
what subject is the best choice for them. Whether one male is the best candidate at one course
but his place is taken for another female with lower grades or fewer certificates.

We can not help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned
with our own communities and countries. Agree?

In these days and ages, there are many people in the world who are in difficulty and need help.
And because we can not help all of them, we should only play our part in looking after our own
communities and countries. I agree that we should focus on improve our countries situation, but
I do think that we could try to help people from other nations as much as possible.

On the one hand, I understand why many people want to deal with their own problems first. it is
an irrefutable fact that most countries in the world have their own issues that need to be tackled,
from poor contries to rich ones. So they want to concentrate on developing countries before
helping others. Besides, if the problems are solved, it will not only benefit for the community as
a whole but individuals are also profitable. For example, if the government could deal with a
high umemployed rate, inhabitant’s standard of living could be enhanced, the number of
homeless and porverty could also be decreased. Additionally, the problems are on our doorstep,
so we can not ignore or overlook, but to find solutions and help our fellow citizens.

On the other hand, we should put our effort into helping foreign people. Most people have a
thought that due to national boundaries between each country, it would be impossible to help
other people. In reality, there are some issues from oversea that would be difficult for them to
solve but it would easier for us. Underdeveloped countries, for instance, are tend to face with
impoverish and food shortage issues, that could make thousands of people dye. But this
problem seems easy for developed and developing nations to help by donating to an
international charity. Just a small action of invididuals could have a huge impact on these poor
countries and save lives of many people in dificulty.
Cycling is more environmentally-friendly than other forms of transport. Why is is not
popular in many places? How to increases its popularity?

There is an irrefutable fact that unlike other vehicles emitting exhaust fumes, bicycles are more
environmentally-friendly. Although they could contribute to protecting the environment, cycling is
not a popular activity in many areas, and some steps would be taken to encourage people to
ride a bike.

There are several reasons for the low popularity of people riding bikes. First, using a motorcycle
or car is much more convenient for inhabitants as it could go with high speech and riders do not
need to use any physical strength. Meanwhile, riding a bike tends to make people exhausted,
especially in extreme weather, besides, this vehicle could not be fast as other forms of transport
so if people want to be on time, they have to depart earlier. Second, the spaces are limited
which would be difficult to carry goods or personal items like bags, documents, or even people.
For example, my mother who has to take me and my sister to school every day could find it is
impossible to carry two people with lots of books and bags besides.

Several solutions could encourage inhabitants to ride a bicycle. First, the government can raise
the price of petro or increase the tax on vehicles like cars or motorbikes. By doing this, the
resident would find it hard to pay for the high price of these vehicles and then turn to using bikes
instead. Second, more land should be built only for bikes which would help people travel faster
when they use them. Finally, more campaigns could be organized to raise individual awareness
of the harmful effects that vehicles emitting exhaust fumes bring to the environment so that they
tend to know their responsibility of protecting their places.

In conclusion, although cycling is not a prevalant activity in some places, methods should be
implemented to mitigate this problem and increase its popularity.

The internet has become so efficient and popular that many people rely on it for
learning. Some suggest that it could replace the use of books as the main source of
knowledge for education. Do you support or oppose the opinion? Explain your position.

There is an irrefutable fact that more and more people rely on the internet serving their learning
purpose due to its effectiveness and popularity. Therefore, some think that it could replace
traditional sources like books and become the main tool of knowledge for education. I do agree
with this view and also suppose that cyberspace has better opportunities to be the primary tool
for studying.
It seems undeniable that the internet has a variety of information that provide learners with
useful and latest knowledge. This information is usually updated and changed to be suitable for
learners, while several books are more likely to be published for a long time and lack reprinting
or modification. This could result in misunderstanding or out-of-date knowledge in learners.
Some old nutrition books, for example, said that mixing garlic and egg in one meal could bring
food poisoning, indeed, the combination of these ingredients only makes dyspepsia in humans.
Moreover, with a smartphone connecting to the internet, people can look up information almost
everywhere and every time they want. Its convenience is the most difference between modern
tools and traditional sources, between the internet and book in general. Because of its small and
compact design, instead of carrying a myriad of books, people just need a phone and they have
the same number of information as books have. Additionally, the way cyberspace provides
materials for learners is also different from the way book does. While information could be
provided by illustrations, tutorial videos, or even online courses, books are just filled with words
and sometimes pictures, which would be harder for learners to imagine or have a deep
understanding of something.
In conclusion, the internet brings several pre-dominant advantages that traditional sources can
not do, so its could be the primary tool helping learners in their education path.
Modern trends in early education focus on an array of practical school projects rather than
developing traditional skills through maths, science and similar subjects. Which do you consider the
better approach and why? Explain your choice, using specific reasons and details.
In these days and ages, early education is more likely to concentrate on teaching students
practical school projects instead of improving traditional skills through maths, science and so on.
In my opinion, while I support that teaching school projects is the better approach, I also
suppose traditional skills should not be overlooked.
On the one hand, unlike traditional subjects, reality projects usually develop communication
skills like how to cooperate with their peers and give their presentations to a crowd which could
be useful for them in their career path. Additionally, it could also boost their confidence – an
important personality that many children lack. Second, youngsters, especially urban kids, do not
have many chances to join practical activities or social experiments, so practical projects
organized by school would broaden the young’s horizons and help them have a deeper
understanding of the practicality of knowledge they have learned at class.
On the other hand, children need to approach traditional skills as these are necessary
foundations that help them have certain knowledge to utilize in their projects. Besides, these
skills are related to higher education knowledge, without these things, students would find it
difficult to get along with their peers, and affects their performance at school. For example,
children who have lacks simple arithmetics in maths or do not understand clearly some real
phenomena in science tend not to mature like others.
In conclusion, although practical school projects could be the main approach for children, I still
believe that traditional skills are indispensable foundations that promote their studying

national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010.
 2005: internati
service increas
300$, replacin
and becoming
sectors./ surpa

It is clear that while the yearly spending on mobile phones increased significantly, the opposite was true
for national landline phone expenditure. Also, the figure for international fixed-line services was lowest
during the period.
In 2001, there was an average of nearly $700 spent on national landline phone services by US residents,
in comparison with only around $200 each on mobile phone and international landline services. Over the
next five years, the average amount spent on national fixed-line phone services fell by approximately
$200. By contrast, yearly spending on cell phone services witnessed a significant increase of roughly
$300. At the same time, the figure for overseas landline services fluctuated slightly below $300.
In 2006, US consumers spent the same amount of money on mobile and national fixed-line services, with
just over $500 on each. From the year 2006 onwards, it can be seen that the average yearly expenditure on
mobile phone services surpassed that of national fixed-line phone services and became the most common
means of telecommunication. To be more specific, yearly spending on mobile phone services increased to
nearly $750 in the final year, while the figure for national landline phone services decreased to about
$400 by the end of the period. During the same period, there was stability in the figure for overseas phone
services.

The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular
physical activity
 do regular physical activity
= exercise on a regular basis
= exercise regularly

The bar chart gives information about the proportion of Australian people who did a regular physical
activity in the year 2010, according to age and gender.
Overall, females did more physical activity than males during the period shown. It is also noticeable that
men between 15 and 24 years old were the only group that had a higher percentage of people
exercising regularly than women in the same age group.
The highest figures were seen in 35-to-64-year-old women, ranging from 52.5 to 53.3%, which is
remarkably higher than these of men in the same age group, ranging from 39.5 to 45.1%. In contrast,
males aged 15 to 24 account for 52.8%, the highest among all ages in males, while the percentage of the
opposite sex who exercise regularly at the same age was only 47.7%.
Turning to the two remaining groups, the proportion of women and men between 25 and 34 years old
taking regular exercise were 48.9 and 42.2 respectively. Besides, the figure for males and females aged
65 or older account for a similar percentage, at about 47%.

The bar chart compares the proportion of people in Australia who exercised on a regular basis in
2010, according to age and gender.

Overall, women exercised more than men. It is also noticeable that boys aged 15 to 24 and
women aged 45 to 54 accounted for the highest percentage of the total people who did regular
exercise.

In 2010, over 50% of women aged 35 to 64 exercised regularly, while the figures for men in the
same age groups were much lower, ranging from 39.5% to 45.1%. The 15 to 24 age group was
the only group in which the proportion of males taking regular exercise was higher than that of
females, 52% and 47.7% respectively.

Turning to the two remaining groups, 48.9% women at the age between 25 and 34 exercised on a
regular basis, whereas the figure for the opposite sex in the same age group was only 42.2%.
Men and women aged 65 or older who did regular physical activity accounted for a similar
percentage, at around 47%.
 Thehttps://zim.vn/pie-chart-ielts pie chart below show the comparison of different kinds of energy
production in France in two years.

remained the highest figure in

the chart
Product

= generate

The pie chart compared the proportion of different kinds of energy producted in france in 1995 and
2005.

It is noticeable that gas and coal were the main productions of energy during the research period.
Additionally, while the figure for petrol decreased remarkably, the proportion of the rest energy
resources witnessed an opposite trend.

In the year 1995, energy prodected by coal accounted for the highest proportion, at 29.80% of the total
energy production in france, following by the percentages of energy generated by gas and petro with
29.63% and 29.27% respectively. Meanwhile, petrol generated only 6.40% of the total energy
production, and the lowest figure can be seen in the percentage of energy producted by other sources

10 years later, the proportion of energy generated by coal and gas increased slightly to 30.93% and
30.31% in the order given. In contrast, petrol reduded its energy production from 29.27% to 19.55%.
there was also an increase in the percentage of energy generated by nuclear by 3.70% but the highest
rise was witnessed in the figure for other materials by 4.20%.

(In 2005, the percentage of energy from Coal went up insignificantly but remained the highest figure in
the chart, at 30.93%. The figure for Gas rose slowly to 30.31%, while that for Petrol experienced a
dramatic fall of nearly 10%. There were sharp increases to 10.10% and 9.10% in the figures for Nuclear
and Other sources respectively.)

be Take up constitute Account for comprise occupy

As oppose Compare to

The pie charts show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The pie charts compare two countries in terms of the average household expenditures in 2010.

It is clear from the chart that housing and other goods and services account for the highest percentage
of average spending in Malaysia and Japan respectively. Meanwhile, people in both countries spent the
lowest proportion of their income on health care.

Japanese people allocated most of their budget for other goods and services, which account for 29%,
compared to 26% of that of Malaysian people. In contrast, the highest percentage of household
expenditures in Malaysia was seen in the figure for health care, at nearly 35%, which was remarkably
higher than that of Japan.

Turing to three remaining categories, two countries experimented with the correspondent proportion of
money spent on food, ranging from 24% to 27%. Additionally, the figures for transport and healthcare in
japan were respectively 20% and 6%, which were twice as much as the figures for Malaysia.

The chart illustrates the proportion of spending on different goods and services of households in two
different countries in 2010.
Overall, it is clear that people in both countries spent the largest proportion of their income on housing
and food, while Healthcare was the service receiving the lowest share of expenditure.
The proportion of spending on Housing was highest in Malaysia, at 34% while Japanese families
allocated just 21% of their budget for this category. In terms of food, the figures for both nations were
similar, at 24% and 27% for Malaysia and Japan respectively.
Regarding the remaining categories, Transport accounted for exactly a fifth of total expenditure in Japan,
twice as much as the figure for Malaysia. Healthcare received the least amount of money in two countries
while the percentage of money spent on other goods and services were quite significant, at over a quarter
in each country.
The pie chart compares visitors of diffirent groups age who went to the local cinema in
the year 2000.

It is clear that people aged 55 and over accounted for the largest proportion during the
period shown, while the lowest percentage was seen in the figure for visitors between
31 and 45 years old.

The percentage of people aged 55 and over showed the most interest in this activity
and occupied more than half of total cinema-visitor, which was significantly higher than
that of people in the age range of 31 to 45, at only 5%.

Regarding the three remaning age groups, about two fifths of people in the youngest
group spending time go to the local cinema. Meanwhile, the figure for the 16-20 age
group was nearly twice as much as that of the 21-to 30-year-olds, at 15% and 8%
respectively.

The bar chart below shows the expenditure that people in two different countries spent
on consumer goods in 2010.
 People in the UK

=British people

The bar chart compares France and The UK in terms of consumer goods expenditures in the year 2010.

It is clear that people in both nations spent the highest amount of their income on cars. In contrast, the
figure for perfume received the least amount of money from people in the UK, and France witnessed the
lowest amount of money spent on cameras.

In terms of cameras, people in the UK spent about 350 000 pounds on them, which was more than twice
the figure for France. Additionally, the expenditure of people in the UK on books was higher than that of
France, at 400.000 pounds and 300 000 pounds respectively. Similarly, people in the UK allocated more
of their budget to cars, at 450 000 pounds, as opposed to the figure for France at 400 000 pounds.

regarding the two remaining categories, both countries experimented a similar amount of money spent
on computers, at around 350 000 pounds and more. Perfume received the lowest share of expenditure,
at 200 000 pounds in France and nearly 150 pounds in THE UK.

The chart illustrates the amount of money spent on five consumer goods in France and
the UK in 2010. Units are measured in pounds sterling.

Overall, the UK spent more money on consumer goods than France in the period given.
Both the British and the French spent most of their money on cars, whereas the least
amount of money was spent on perfume in the UK and on cameras in France.

In terms of cars, people in the UK spent about £450,000 on this as opposed to the
French at £400,000. Similarly, the British expenditure was higher on books than the
French (around £400,000 and £300,000 respectively). In the UK, expenditure on
cameras (just over £350,000) was over double that of France, which was
only £150,000.

On the other hand, the amount of money paid out on the remaining goods was higher in
France. Above £350,000 was spent by the French on computers, which was slightly
more than the British who spent exactly £350,000. Neither if the countries spent much
on perfume which accounted for £200,000 of expenditure in France but under £150,000
in the UK.

The chart compares five countries in terms of the proportion of money spent on food, housing,
transportation, health care and clothing in 2009.

Overall, five nations spent most of their money on housing, while the figure for clothing received the
lowest share of their expenditure, followed by the percentage of money spent on clothing.

People in the US allocated 26% of their budget for housing, which was remarkably higher than that of
the figure for food in this nation, at only 14%. Meanwhile, Japanese people spent the largest proportion
of their income on the figure for food. Additionally, Canada and UK witnessed 15% and exactly 20% of
the percentage of money spent on that category respectively. In terms of housing, these countries also
experimented the similar expenditure at around 22%.

Regarding the three remaining sectors, the percentage of money paid out on transportation was the
highest in Canada, at 20%, which was twice as much as the figure for Japan. Moreover, while the US
comprised the highest proportion of money spent on healthcare, at above 7%, this nation allocated the
lowest percentage of its budget on clothing, at only 3%. In this term, Canada and UK continually were
the correspondent proportions, at about 5%.