Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FS2 EPISODE3 Done
FS2 EPISODE3 Done
Benjamin Bloom cited three (3) domains of knowledge – cognitive, psychomotor, and affective.
Kendall and Marzano also gave three (3) groups of learning- information (declarative knowledge),
metacognitive procedures (procedural knowledge) and psychomotor procedures (motor or physical
skills). This Episode will focus on these domains of knowledge and learning.
My Performance Criteria
My learning Essentials
2.Mental procedure- procedural Knowledge, e.g. Writings a term paper, reading map algorithms like
computing long division
3. Psychomotor/Physical Procedure/ Motor skills- Skills e.g. Playing basketball, building furniture.
Concrete examples:
Information:
Mental Procedures- Conducting proofs and figuring the length of the side of a right triangle.
Physical/Psychomotor Procedures/ Motor skills
Constructing a right triangle with a compass and ruler
Concrete examples
My MAP
My Learning Activities
I will make of Observation Sheets, analyze my observation by answering the given questions
then write down my reflections.
(lANGUAGE/Araling panlipunan/Science/Math)
2. Mental Procedures (Procedural) Teacher Marlin tells her pupils to write the
Knowledge)- e.g mental skills such as alphabet to their papers.
writing a paragraph
Domain of Learning
Activities
4. Affective- values, attitude I notice the values that can be attribute here is
more of persistence and diligence.
2. Mental Procedures (Procedural Their test of knowledge here is when the teacher
Knowledge)- e.g mental skills such as ask the students about the story and they will
writing a paragraph answer it.
2. Were the lessons focused on cognitive content only or psychomotor content only or
affective content only? Or were the lessons combinations of two or three? Explain
your answer.
It is a combination of the three of the most part. Usually, when there is only one content
emphasized for the whole duration, the class could either not learn anything or get
information overload.
3. What was the effect on learning when teaching was focused on only one domain?
From my experience focusing in one domain only can still produce a desired learning
outcome, but it doesn’t unlock all the learning has to offer. True, it is still part of the process
but not in it’s entirely.
4. Is really possible to teach only in one domain like Affective only or cognitive only or
psychomotor only? Or based on Kendall’s and Marzano’s taxonomy, information
only or mental procedures only or psychomotor procedures only? Explain your
answer.
As I mention, it is possible to teach only in one domain, however the desired outcome might
be quite far from expected. However, nothing not achievable even if you only focus on one
domain.
5. Do Kendall’s and Marzano’ a knowledge taxonomy and bloom’s taxonomy of
learning activities contradict each other? Explain your answer.
No, because the two taxonomy’s emphasis is with every domain that a student must augment
for their high-thinking skills.
My Reflection
Based on your observations in class and on your understanding of the domains of
knowledge and learning activities from bloom, Kendall and Marzano, how can you make your
teaching – learning activity more meaningful and more relevant? Is lesson more relevant when
you teach only in the cognitive or when you teach in the cognitive domain combined with the
affective or psychomotor Combined with the affective?
Answer:
Base on my observations the use of the three domains such as cognitive, affective and
psychomotor will promote the students’ engagement to the subject topic. Some of the learning
approaches that could be integrated in approach can include self-guided learning, mutual learning,
role playing, behavioral practice, peer education and parent connection.
1. Based on Kendall’s and Marzano’s new taxonomy, in what domains was Teacher Mila’s
lesson?
2. Which part of teacher Mila’s lesson consists of mental procedures (procedural knowledge)?
3. Based on bloom’s taxonomy, which part of teacher Mila’s lesson is in the psychomotor
domain
4. If Teacher Mila’s lesson objective intended learning outcome is ``to focus the
microscope correctly’’, could she have just shown the class how to do it without
explaining the parts of the microscope and their corresponding functions?
a. No
b. Yes,21stCenturystudentslearn skill very fast
c. Yes, but risky
d. No, it is basic for students to know the function of each part. This guides the students on how
to focus the microscope.
5. If explaining and demonstrating are necessary for Teacher Mila to realize her
lesson objective/intended learning outcome, what does this imply on lesson planning
and development for whole and meaningful learning.
COMMENT/S
_______________________________________ ____________
Signature of FS Teacher above Printed Name Date