Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Foreign Policy of Pakistan - Jahangir's World Times
Foreign Policy of Pakistan - Jahangir's World Times
Foreign Policy of Pakistan - Jahangir's World Times
Pakistan’s first major foreign policy decision was obligated by India’s hostility,
manifest in refusal to respect the principles of the partition and transfer Pakistan’s
share of British India’s assets, including the ordnance stores that left Pakistan’s
Armed forces of 50,000 men without weapons for defence. In order to secure its
independence, the new born state was in need of funds. For that reason, the government
decided in October 1947 to move towards US for a loan of $ 2billion for defence
procurement and economic progress.
Quotes
No foreign policy — no matter how ingenious — has any chance of success if it is born in the minds of a
Henry A. Kissinger
“Foreign Policy is the use of political influence in order to induce other states to exercise their
lawmaking power in a manner desired by the states concerned: it is an interaction between forces
originating outside the country’s borders and those working within themâ€.
Prof. F. S. Northedge
“Idealistic in inspiration, Pakistan’s foreign policy had to quickly come to grips with the reality of the
Agha Shahi
“The foreign policy of a country is in a sense a projection of its internal policies, social, political and
economic.â€
Definitions
Oxford Dictionary
Encyclopaedia Britannica
General objectives that guide the activities and relationships of one state in its interactions with other
states.
Merriam Webster Dictionary
The policy of a sovereign state in its interaction with other sovereign states
General Definitions
1. Foreign policy dictates how a country will act with respect to other countries politically, socially,
economically, and militarily, and to a somewhat lesser extent, how it behaves towards non-state actors.
2. Foreign policy is the name of relations between sovereign states. It is reflection of domestic politics and
an interaction among sovereign states. It indicates the principles and preferences on which a country
Foreign policy makers follow the same five steps with which public policy gets made:
5. Evaluation: Officials and agencies judge whether the policy has been successful.
Diplomacy is the tool of foreign policy, and war, alliances, and international trade may all be
manifestations of it.
Kinds of Diplomacy
“Diplomacy is a game of chess in which the nations are checkmated.†(Karl Kraus)
Track 1 Diplomacy
Official discussions typically involving high-level political and military leaders and focusing on ceasefires,
Track 2 Diplomacy
Unofficial dialogue and problem-solving activities aimed at building relationships and encouraging new
thinking that can inform the official process. Track 2 activities typically involve influential academic,
religious, and NGO leaders and other civil society actors who can interact more freely than high-ranking
officials.
Track 3 Diplomacy
People-to-people diplomacy undertaken by individuals and private groups to encourage interaction and
understanding between hostile communities and involving awareness raising and empowerment within
these communities. Normally focused at the grassroots level, this type of diplomacy often involves
organizing meetings and conferences, generating media exposure, and political and legal advocacy for
Secret lines of communication held open between two adversaries. It is often communicated through an
Multitrack diplomacy
A term for operating on several tracks simultaneously, including official and unofficial conflict resolution
efforts, citizen and scientific exchanges, international business negotiations, international cultural and
There are few kinds of approaches of foreign policy, which help in understanding the foreign policy but
they are used in different period of history. These are Historical or Traditional Approaches. These
approaches have been adopted for the study of diplomatic events of a particular period with accuracy,
Legalistic Approach
This approach lays emphasis on the study of foreign policy in legalistic terms. Efforts are made to study
the external relations of the states in the light of international law, treaties, constitutional provisions etc.
Descriptive Approach
The scholars adopting this approach pick up some specific problems or conceptual framework, using their
This approach differs from all other approaches of study not only with regards to the method but also in
of international politics.
Comparative Approach
The comparative approach for the study of foreign policies is of relatively recent origin and draws
Ideological Approach
This approach tries to analyze foreign policy as an expression of the prevailing political, social or religious
beliefs. Thus, the policies are classified as democratic or authoritarian; liberal and socialistic, peace-loving
or aggressive. However, the study of foreign policy purely on ideological basis is not possible because
when there is clash between ideology and rational interests, the former is abandoned.
A country’s foreign policy is supposed to stay in lockstep with its political progression. By this yardstick,
Pakistan’s foreign policy has, indeed, kept as tortuous a course as its political meandering, stumbling
Pakistan’s Foreign Policy is determined by the inescapable facts of history and of geography and by
special influences which may be of transitory nature. A look back at the history of Pakistan’s foreign
policy reveals a continuity of aims as well as changing strategies. There have been shifts in policy from
time to time in the light of changes in the global and regional environment.
“Our foreign policy is one of the friendliness and goodwill towards all the nation of the world. We do
not cherish aggressive designs against any country or nation. We believe in the principle of honesty and
fair-play in national and international dealings, and are prepared to make our contribution to the
promotion of peace and prosperity among the nations of the world. Pakistan will never be found lacking in
extending its material and moral support to the oppressed and suppressed peoples of the world and in
based on Islamic unity, support the common interests of the peoples of Asia, Africa and Latin America,
promote international peace and security, foster goodwill and friendly relations among all nations and
2. Developing friendly relations with all countries of the world, especially major powers and immediate
neighbours.
6. Ensuring optimal utilization of national resources for regional and international cooperation.
Determinants
The following five factors are the main determinants of Pakistan’s foreign policy:
Islamic ideology is a very important factor in the determination of Pakistan’s foreign policy. The late
“Pakistan came into being as a result of the urge felt by the Muslims of this subcontinent to secure a
territory, however limited, where the Islamic ideology and way of life could be practiced and
(ii)Historical Legacy
Pakistan inherited from the British files of the India Office the fear of Russia. Pakistan’s foreign policy
makers always sought western assistance to stem the Russian advance towards their territory, though at
(iii)Geographical Location
When we look at Pakistan’s location, the statement that “the foreign policy of Pakistan largely
begins and ends at her borders, more particularly at the Indian border,†seems to be accurate. A
cursory look at the map of Pakistan indicates that roughly half of Pakistan’s land frontiers meet with
India, about one-third with Afghanistan, approximately one-sixth with Iran and a very small strip with
China. Russia is also very close to it through her former republic of Tajikistan.
Since independence, Pakistan’s national security is being threatened by the India because the British
left the Kashmir issue unresolved and three wars have been fought between both countries. As long as the
Kashmir issue is unresolved Pakistan has to formulate its foreign policy by keeping in view this constant
danger.
(v)Economic Compulsions
Pakistan as a developing country also needs to establish and maintain cordial relations with those states
with whom it can maximize its trade relations or from whom it can obtain maximum economic aid.
• Pro-West
• India-centric
• Security-oriented
• 1953-62 – alignment with the West (SEATO, CENTO, Mutual Cooperation Pact, US Foreign
Assistance Act)
• 1971-79 – bilateralism and non-alignment (introduced by Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto)
• 1980-88 – tilted non-alignment (Pro-US but still normal with socialists except Soviet Union)
• 1989-2000 – search for allies (oscillating relationship with US; issues-based foreign policy)
• 2000 – on wards frontline state in war on terror; allegations of double game
to respect the principles of the partition and transfer Pakistan’s share of British India’s assets,
including the ordnance stores that left Pakistan’s Armed forces of 50,000 men without weapons for
defence. In order to secure its independence, the new born state was in need of funds. For that reason,
the government decided in October 1947 to move towards US for a loan of $ 2billion for defence
2. The second major foreign policy decision was a consequence of US strategy for making a military
alliance in the Middle East for the defence of political stability and safeguard of access to the rich
petroleum resources of the Gulf region. In the mid-1950s, Pakistan had global, regional and domestic
raison d’être to join Western-sponsored military pacts (and Grasping the opportunity for defence,
Pakistani leaders decided to sign a defence agreement SEATO, 1954 and Baghdad Pact, 1955 which was
During 1954-62, Pakistan received $ 5 billion (about $ 20 billion in current prices) in economic aid and
arms supplies.
3. Third major foreign policy decision was seen when Pak-US relations with the United States came under
increasing strain. Ayub Khan (1958-69) is considered to be the architect of Pak-US defence relations and
therefore, he simultaneously offered India a “Joint Defence Pactâ€. Possibly under American
pressure and against the popular reaction at home, he defied the temptation to march into Kashmir in
1962 when India was all enmeshed with the Chinese in its North-East
4. The fourth turning point followed the defeat and disaster of 1971, as soon as Pakistan reversed its
policy of nuclear abstinence. When Bhutto came to power, the overall Indo-Pak power equation had
skewed towards India and Pakistan was no match for it. Bhutto initiated to stress Pakistan’s Middle-
Eastern character and asserted that Pakistan drew its purpose and identity principally from the sands of
the Arabian Peninsula. Consequently, Pakistan received much aid from the Shiekhs of Gulf and vowed to
5. The fifth turning point came after the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan in December 1979. The Super
power advanced to Pakistan’s border and exposed Pakistan to the nightmare of the Indo-Soviet
nutcracker. After an initial hesitation, Pakistan accepted US cooperation, assistance. In 1990, out of the
blue, this period of the revitalized alliance ended, when the US President Senior Bush (1989-93), invoked
6. Pakistan’s decision to “join world community in the war against terrorism brought it back into
the international mainstream and won it the revived and stronger support from major countries of the
world, which it very much required in order to fight Al Qaeda and the indigenous Taliban who unleashed a
The strategic environment around Pakistan is evolving and changing rapidly and it warrants an adjustment
of foreign policy to take advantage of the changes or at least remain in sync with them. Unfortunately, the
domestic scene does not support such an effort. Pakistan does not have a foreign minister and many
embassies still await ambassadors. The world is moving on and it is doing so without Pakistan on board.
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif while addressing an all-parties conference in early August, said that Pakistan
was becoming isolated and other than China, it had no real friends in the region. Clearly, an unstable
government can’t really focus on foreign policy, which in any case, is determined by the national
security doctrine set by the country’s powerful military. That the Chinese President visited India and
did not stop in Pakistan is a historical departure. Domestic turbulence in Pakistan may have contributed to
this, but the red-carpet treatment given to President Xi Jinping in India is a signal that must not be
underestimated. India is aggressively pursuing the strategy of its economic and business expansion, with
In today’s changed world, Pakistan needs internal stability and strength to pursue its foreign policy
interests. This is not the time to create internal instabilities. This is the time for internal harmony so that