Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Executive Summary Akib
Executive Summary Akib
PROJECT
Submitted to Submitted by
Throughout the design process, we faced several challenges. The power screw design required
ensuring it could lift 10,630 N with a safe margin, adjusting to a 60° constraint angle for stress
management, and determining the correct diameter of the power screw while ensuring it met
market standards. For the arms and links, we focused on preventing buckling while maintaining
a factor of safety and iteratively adjusted their height and width. The crankshaft and handle
analysis involved ensuring dimensional precision to withstand lifting forces and applying
distortion energy theory for durability.
Material constraints were another significant challenge. We opted to use carbon steel
throughout the design, despite potential benefits from stronger materials, and adjusted
dimensions to compensate for these limitations. Balancing safety factors with economic
feasibility required iterative refinement to meet safety standards without exceeding the budget.
Visualization and modeling were also crucial, involving the creation of a SolidWorks model for
visual representation and collaborative assembly of individual parts for final product
visualization. Additionally, iterative calculations were necessary to ensure dimensional accuracy
and optimization.
This design offers enhanced load distribution, ergonomic operation, robust construction, and a
versatile base plate. It stands as a testament to our commitment to safety, reliability, and user-
friendly operation, making it a dependable tool for both professional and personal automotive
maintenance needs.
Discussion
The development of our car lifting screw jack presented a variety of technical challenges that
required innovative solutions and meticulous planning. Key among these was the power screw
design, which needed to lift 10,630 N safely. We addressed this by selecting an M20 screw,
adjusting the angle constraints to 60° for optimal stress management, and ensuring the screw's
diameter met industry standards. The design of the arms and links was equally critical; we
focused on preventing buckling by carefully calculating and adjusting their dimensions, ensuring
a high factor of safety. The crankshaft and handle required precise dimensional analysis to
endure lifting forces, employing distortion energy theory to enhance durability.
Material selection posed another challenge, as we opted for carbon steel to balance strength
and cost-effectiveness. This necessitated dimension adjustments to compensate for any
material limitations. Additionally, we faced the need to balance safety and economic
considerations, refining our design iteratively to meet stringent safety standards without
exceeding budget constraints. Visualization played a crucial role in our process, with SolidWorks
models helping us to assemble and visualize the final product comprehensively. Through
iterative calculations and collaborative efforts, we achieved a design that is robust, reliable, and
user-friendly, ensuring it meets both professional and personal automotive maintenance needs
effectively.
Conclusion
The designing process of this mechanism involved critical decision making and methodological
approach. By continuous development process, the calculations of the fundamental parts of the
car lifting mechanism were revised. Insights of load distribution, material constraints,
adjustment of dimensions to meet necessary requirements, utilization of CAD software etc.
were furnished among all the team members. The final mechanism i.e. screw jack was proved to
be reliable and safe. The project provided us with ample opportunity to learn and execute the
steps of a mechanical design process and improvement of our industrial knowledge.