Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IEEE Template - Part6
IEEE Template - Part6
1 Article
4 1
lionel.orama@ece.edu
5 2
fernando.lozano@ece.edu
6 * Electrical and computer Engineering Department, University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez Campus, Puerto
7 Rico/US.
8 Abstract: This research has been developed in response to frequent and prolonged power outages
9 by the utility owing to lightning, hurricanes, earthquakes, including continuous faults affecting
10 the University Puerto Rico at Mayagüez (UPRM). Outages are due in part to outdated electrical
11 infrastructure. To deal with the situation the installation of two cogenators, 2 megawatts (MW) in
12 total capacity, has been proposed. This will be considered a distributed energy resource (DERs).
13 The UPRM electrical distribution system can become a feasible microgrid system model that, if
14 implemented, can mitigate the effects of future power outages. To attain this objective, this
15 research focused on using modern technology equipment within the UPRM electrical distribution.
16 A model of a microgrid architecture in DigSilent software was implemented, which could operate
17 in grid isolated mode, and parallel with the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA). Each
18 operation mode is related to over-current protection settings and dynamic protection setting
19 schemes to mitigate abnormal conditions and increase the level of resilience and security. Results
20 show that the adaptive protection program designed for the campus-wide microgrid is efficient
21 and that maintains a balance among both power generation and its demand when the utility
22 Citation: Citation: Orama, L. An service is missing.
Examination of Households’
23 Attitudes towards Renewable Keywords: Microgrid Control System, Intelligent Device Electronic and System Control and
24 Energy Source Investments in Lower Acquisition Data.
25 Silesian Voivodeship. Energies 2023,
16, 7100.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16207100
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
32 part of the existing power system infrastructure, generally located downstream of the
33 substation stepdown transformer.
34 Conventional power systems are being impacted by the penetration of DER or
35 Distributed Generation (DG). Enhancing resilience and reliability of power systems by
36 insertion of DERs, decreases transmission line losses. For these reasons, microgrid
37 systems create new issues with their interoperability with utilities, for instance the
38 conventional protection systems are not able to detect several rated fault current
39 contributions by DERs and the utility grid cannot address such current faults. This
40 happens when interconnecting operation changes to grid-islanded operation within a
41 microgrid. Recall that the rated fault current depends on the impedance from the utility
42 grid or external source (Zs) and impedance from DERs (Zg).
43 A fairly accurate representation is engaged herein, where the effects of microgrid
44 protection, Figure 1., presents DGs on fault current contribution, according to [1] and [2].
45
46 Figure 1. Contribution of fault current due to three-phase faults in the utmost of feeder.(Adapted from
47 [12])
48 A fault in the feeder downstream has two fault current contributions: the utility
49 grid and the DG. For which, it is necessary to convert the circuit shown into an
50 equivalent circuit for the analysis of the rated fault current.
51 In this regard, the impedance is defined by a distance parameter due to DG location
52 and the total length from the Point of Common Coupling (PCC) to feeders or buses.
53
d
l=
d tot
54
( 1)
55
56 Where, d is a distance between PCC and adjacent feeder, and also dtot is an entire
57 length of the feeder. The equivalent network of Figure 1 can be represented by the
58 simplified circuit in Figure 2.
6
7 Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 15
8
59 ZL is total line impedance, also I1 and I2 are the mesh currents from the utility and
60 from the DG, respectively. On the other hand, Us is the utility grid's Thevenin
61 equivalent voltage Ug is the DG's voltage. Then, to compute I1 and I2:
62
[ ][
Us
Ug
=
Z s+ Z L ( 1−l )∗Z L I
][ ]
. 1
( 1−l )∗Z L Z g+ ( 1−l )∗Z L I 2
( 2)
63
65 In equation (2), I1 is provided by the utility grid fault current Ik_grid, and I2 are
66 provided by the DGs fault current contribution Ik_gen. Thus, to compute Thevenin
67 impedance it is necessary to convert the circuit in Figure 2 into an equivalent circuit
68 shown in Figure 3.
69
71
72 Therefore, the Thevenin impedance is:
73
( Z s +l. Z L ) . Z g
Z th= + (1−l ) . Z L
Z S+ l. Z L + Z g
74
( 3)
75
9
10 Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 15
11
12
13 Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 15
14
107 when the circuit shall be isolated by the circuit breaker in the faulted area within the
108 microgrid protection zones (see [3] and [4]).
109 The circuit with the fault is isolated because the consequences such as between the
110 phase-conductor failures can cause severe damage to the circuit, also an arc blast or fire
111 cand destroy the equipment of a grid system, it can also cause burn or/and electrical shock
112 on the maintenance personnel working around the equipment.
113 The protection apparatus should receive a signal that includes fault data from the
114 system sensor. By ensuring the stability of the microgrid system with appropriate
115 programming by the MGCCS is essential, permitting the microgrid system restoration
116 when its system operates in island mode [10].
117 The faults are classified in power protection systems as symmetrical or
118 unsymmetrical faults. A balanced system, on the one hand, requires three-phase
119 voltages with a phase shift 120 degrees between them due to balanced voltage sources or
120 balanced load, and a fault duty in this system will cause symmetrical faults. In contrast,
121 an imbalanced system, on the other hand, is caused due to their different load ranges,
122 and a fault duty in this system will cause in unsymmetrical faults.
123 Moreover, potential short circuit fault conditions include three phases to earth,
124 three phases clear of the earth, phase to phase, single phase to earth, two phases to earth,
125 and phase to phase plus single phase to earth. Ground faults only involve a phase
126 conductor to the ground and phase faults involve two or more phase conductors with or
127 without ground in a conventional distribution system. However, in most cases where a
128 distribution system is underground the most common type of failure is single-phase to
129 ground.
130 However, for microgrid protection the most common type of failure has been given
131 in twos scenarios. On the one hand, Protection Blinding or Under-reach that is based on
132 a topology duly presented in Figure 2{5, for a fault at bus 2 near Load 2 (L2), DG1
133 provides a fraction of the fault current (Ik;gen). The relay R1 might not operate owing to
134 the fault current contribution from the utility grid ( Ik;grid) that is feeding to the fault,
135 since DG1 is connected close to the fault location, reducing the fault current supplied by
136 the utility that is measured by relay R1.
137
138
139 Figure 4. Circuit of protection blinding due to 3-phase fault into bus2.
15
16 Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 15
17
140 On the other hand, Bidirectional Current Flow Protection For the circuit provided in
141 Figure 2{6, which presents two cases first, when a fault occurs in Bus 2, the fault current
142 always shows downstream, as in the previous case, toward the fault location. On the
143 other hand, whether the fault occurs close to PCC, hence the location of the fault current
144 changes due to fault current contribution by DG1. Relay R1 ought to discriminate the
145 direction of fault current because the phenomenon and etc., the coordination and causes
146 selectivity problems in the traditional overcurrent protection.
147
148
149 Figure 5. Bidirectional Circuit with bidirectional fault current of both the bus PCC and Bus2.
150 A case of study has been developed in this research addressed for the University of
151 Puerto Rico UPRM as potential microgrid system. The modeling was developed under
152 two electrical software (DigSilent Power Factory & Matlab) in creating a program that
153 works under the criteria of a moder devices of the protection system.
154
18
19 Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 15
20
162
163 Figure 6. The left picture is the UPRM aerial snapshot; and the right picture is the central Chiller (yellow
164 block), micro turbines (while block), the university substation (red block).
165
166 The electrical schemes along with pint of coupling PCC have been set so that it can
167 be able to support a digital programming under layers from Digsilent Power Factory as
168 can be saw in the next figure.
169
170
21
22 Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 15
23
172
173 Adaptive protection under a microgrid control system MGCCS has been entered
174 on electrical software in forming a co-simulation between Matlab and DigSilent power
175 factory.
176
24
25 Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 15
26
206
207 The upgrading at existing UPRM substation was developed to become a Microgrid
208 system, only changing their protective relays from an update relay to modern relays,
209 including their electrical cabinets. Furthermore, in this university have purchase a new
210 cogenators for enhancing its reliability when an unnatural phenomenon occurs in site.
211 By installing Digital Multifunctional Relays (DMFR) duly installed inside UPRM
212 substation for operating as microgrid control system the dynamic protection schemes
213 under adaptive protection was developed to verify if the protection schemes for
214 microgrid system are changing when the co-generators are connected in parallel mode
215 to the utility, disconnected from utility and during its transition mode. The
216 configuration of the relay setting was done to passing the transition scenario without
217 lose the providing electricity to the UPRM potential microgrid system.
27
28 Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 15
29
218
227
228 The short circuit current when the DER is operating in parallel mode was computed
229 in the low voltage side from distribution transformer.
30
31 Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 15
32
230
231 When a power outage occurs, the Luma utility is turn off and appear a transition
232 mode that start when the power outages occurs and finish when the cogeneration is
233 proving electricity for the critical infrastructure inside the UPRM. The transition mode
234 consists with a ramp, where the active power and reactive power is losing due to power
235 outages. Given the cogenators comprises its own active and reactive level, it will not
236 provide electricity to whole UPRM system. However, the microgrid control system shall
237 select the critical loads and turn on to them, so that the system can lose its stability.
238
33
34 Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 15
35
239
240 The final transition comprises when finish successfully transition mode and the
241 new distribution system is on operation condition.
242
243
244
36
37 Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 15
38
245
246
247 The above figure show that the scheme protective for a microgrid operating on
248 island mode is absolutely minor that when the distribution system have been
249 interconnected to the utility.
250 5. Conclusions
251 This work has been devoted to the modeling of a stand-alone microgrid system
252 based on ungrounded distribution system type of the UPRM inside DigSilent by way of
253 the implementation of modern protection equipment according to suitable
254 communication system, strategically. In this manner, this distribution system can
255 become in a standalone microgrid system via the Microgrid Central Control System
256 installed, which is achieved placing in university substation of UPRM campus.
257 Microgrid protection, resilience, reliability, and sustainability must be considered,
258 including the traditional concept of selectivity because these concepts are of utmost
259 importance. In that sense, an accurate protection scheme is created for the microgrid
260 with the implementation of modern protection equipment. Therefore, we conclude that
261 the UPRM requires to be upgraded its protection system must be based on microgrid
262 protection zones and modern technologies integration. The single-line distribution
39
40 Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 14 of 15
41
263 system schematic provided by the UPRM electrical personnel and was updated to
264 accomplish a model in DigSilent software.
265
266 Funding: This research was funded by University of Puerto Rico under Dotal Founds.
267 Data Availability Statement: All statistical, financial, and non-financial statement data can be
268 found with the author. Available upon request.
269 Acknowledgments: I acknowledge the Electrical and computer Engineering Department,
270 University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez Campus by permit me using the available data of the UPRM
271 Distribution system.
272 Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the
273 design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the
274 manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.”.
275 Abbreviations
42
43 Energies 2023, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 15 of 15
44
315 References
316
317 1. B. Kruimer E. J. Coster, J. M. A. Myrzik and W. L. Kling. Integration issues of distributed generation in distribution grids.
318 IEEE The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 99, 2011.
319 2. J. Myrzik E. J. Coster and W. Kling. E ect of dg on distribution grid protection in distributed generation. IEEE The Institute of
320 Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2010.
321 3. Saeed Aminifar F. Teimourzadeh and Mahdi Shahidehpour M. Davarpanah. An adaptive reclosing scheme for preserving
322 dynamic security in low-inertia microgrids. IEEE The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Smart grid, 10:6228
323 6236, 2019.
324 4. J.C. DAS. Power Systems Handbook Short-Circuits in AC and DC Systems. CRC Press Taylor, Francis Group, 1ed edition,
325 2018.
326 Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
327 author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury
328 to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions, or products referred to in the content.
45