Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Ebook of Sexual Abuse and Education in Japan in The International Shadows First Edition Robert Omochain Online PDF All Chapter
Full Ebook of Sexual Abuse and Education in Japan in The International Shadows First Edition Robert Omochain Online PDF All Chapter
https://ebookmeta.com/product/sexual-abuse-and-the-sexual-
offender-1st-edition-barry-maletzky/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/sexual-violence-in-
australia-1970s-1980s-rape-and-child-sexual-abuse-1st-edition-
lisa-featherstone/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/thriving-after-sexual-abuse-denise-
bossarte/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/education-and-equality-in-japan-
william-k-cummings/
Paedophilia and Child Sexual Abuse in Drama and Theatre
1st Edition Daniel Meyer-Dinkgräfe
https://ebookmeta.com/product/paedophilia-and-child-sexual-abuse-
in-drama-and-theatre-1st-edition-daniel-meyer-dinkgrafe/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/education-in-tokugawa-japan-r-p-
dore/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/eating-disorders-and-child-sexual-
abuse-1st-edition-lisa-hodge/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-medicalization-of-incest-and-
abuse-biomedical-and-indigenous-perceptions-in-rural-bolivia-
carolina-borda-nino-wildman/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/fighters-in-the-shadows-a-new-
history-of-the-french-resistance-1st-edition-robert-gildea/
Sexual Abuse and Education
in Japan
Bringing together two voices, practice and theory, in a collaboration
that emerges from lived experience and structured reflection upon
that experience, O’Mochain and Ueno show how entrenched
discursive forces exert immense influence in Japanese society and
how they might be most effectively challenged.
With a psychosocial framework that draws insights from feminism,
sociology, international studies, and political psychology, the authors
pinpoint the motivations of the nativist right and reflect on the
change of conditions that is necessary to end cultures of impunity
for perpetrators of sexual abuse in Japan. Evaluating the value of the
#MeToo model of activism, the authors offer insights that will
encourage victims to come out of the shadows, pursue justice, and
help transform Japan’s sense of identity both at home and abroad.
Ueno, a female Japanese educator, and O’Mochain, a non-Japanese
male academic, examine the nature of sexual abuse problems both
in educational contexts and in society at large through the use of
surveys, interviews, and engagement with an eclectic range of
academic literature. They identify the groups within society who
offer the least support for women who pursue justice against
perpetrators of sexual abuse. They also ask if far-right ideological
extremists are fixated with proving that so-called “comfort women”
are higaisha-buru or “fake victims.” Japan would have much to gain
on the international stage were it to fully acknowledge historical
crimes of sexual violence, yet it continues to refuse to do so.
O’Mochain and Ueno shed light on this puzzling refusal through
recourse to the concepts of “international status anxiety” and “male
hysteria.”
An insightful read for scholars of Japanese society, especially those
concerned about its treatment of women.
Feminist approaches
In this work, one author (Ueno) adopts a broadly sociological
perspective, while the other (O’Mochain) applies an international
studies/political psychology framework. However, both share a
broadly feminist perspective which assumes that male subordination
of women is a significant problem facing global society in varied and
complex ways. Reasons for the lack of popularity of feminism in
Japan may include it being portrayed as a “Western” import and
because of a common perception that feminism can be equated with
a higaisha ishiki (victim mentality).8 This is problematic in a culture
that values self-reliance and individual endurance for the common
good (Dales, 2009, p. 92). However, it is still possible to adapt
feminist principles to Japanese culture and society in a way that is
empowering for all. This aim justifies recourse to tertiary sources of
data such as newspaper and magazine articles as they cover topical
cases that provide insights into the nature of abuse and harassment
in the lives of contemporary individuals who are often overlooked in
academic analysis. We also draw on shinsho, which are short,
relatively cheap books that are often written by academic scholars to
share their knowledge on a specific cultural, political, or social topic
with a broad audience. Shūkanshi, which are weekly newsmagazines
that are similar to tabloid press publications in some respects,
provided content for analysis as these magazines sometimes reflect
the views of powerful far-right factions while also enjoying a massive
readership. While this genre is often ignored by “serious
scholarship,” perhaps because of its association with sensationalist
content and pornographic imagery and because there is a great deal
of variation in ideological positionings and in the accuracy of news
reporting, shūkanshi remain the most influential opinion-shapers in
Japanese society and they merit greater academic attention (Gamble
& Watanabe, 2004). Interviews and informal conversations allowed
us to check that our interpretations of readings were plausible and,
more importantly, to deepen our understanding of how sexual abuse
affects people’s lives. The feminist movement negotiates a tension
between those who focus on the production of academic scholarship
grounded in theory and those who use broad-based activism for the
transformation of the attitudes of all members of society. They focus
on solidarity among women of all backgrounds, and many see texts
with excessive “academic jargon” as inaccessible and unhelpful for
most readers who try to engage with feminist thought (Itō, 2015).
The latter school of thought argues that if feminists seek to
incorporate the “masculine logic” of academic rigor, then connectivity
will be lost in the name of objectivity. This work compromises by
incorporating most academic conventions, but also departing from
them at times to maximize accessibility and possibilities for a fully
human reaction, simultaneously cognitive and emotional. Certainly, a
bias in male-dominated academic scholarship often prevents
women’s issues from receiving the attention that they deserve. Thus,
recourse to non-academic sources is justified when these sources
are evaluated from a critical perspective.
Japanese feminisms
Feminists in Japan have strenuously promoted non-hierarchical social
arrangements as well as problematizing the notion of legitimate
violence. Prominent feminist and sociologist Ueno Chizuko (2004, p.
178) asserts that feminism problematizes violence per se, especially
the notion that state-sponsored public violence can be normalized or
that the violence that goes on behind closed doors in domestic
settings is beyond society’s remit. Ayres, Friedman, and Leaper
(2009) found that women who identify as feminist are more likely
than women who do not make a feminist identification to confront
sexism when they experience it in their own lives. Rather than being
associated with a victim mentality, then, feminism should be
associated with those who refuse to silently accept and internalize a
victim mentality. This perspective is appropriate for an examination
of sexual abuse in Japanese society. Justice Ministry figures for
criminal cases of “forced obscenity” in 2018 showed that out of 5340
cases, 5152 victims (over 96%) were women and girls. Shibata
(2008, p. 5) clarifies that “forced obscenity” usually refers to acts of
coercive touching of a person’s sexual body parts or kissing a person
on the lips without their permission. While it is likely that many male
victims do not report the acts of unwanted sexual attention that they
have experienced, it remains clear that sexual assault is
disproportionately carried out by men and it is a problem that
disproportionately affects women. Feminists in Japan have provided
copious supports for the contention that men are still accorded
excessive status in their society. A focus on negative social
conditions in Japan does not imply that the country is being unfairly
singled out; most parts of the world have similar or worse
conditions. In 2020, a UN-sponsored global survey found that 90%
of people in the world have some form of bias against women
(Tackling Social Norms, 2020). The survey of over 80% of the
world’s population found that over 40% of respondents believed
that, in times of job scarcity, men have a greater right to jobs than
do women. This implies a danger that many women will be made to
feel as if they do not belong in particular workplaces and may be
subject to harassment. This is a danger in Japan, as a national
survey from 2012 indicated that only 20% of Japanese men fully
supported the right of married women to pursue their careers
(Norma, 2018, p. 3).
While it is more accurate to speak of Japanese feminisms in the
plural, as there have been, and still are, a large number of varying
backgrounds and perspectives (cf. Bullock, Kano, & Welker, 2018),
this work assumes that all feminists share the common objective of
trying to eliminate sexual abuse from every society. A feminist
theoretical framework prioritizes women’s rights as human rights and
equality of opportunity for all. It rejects social Darwinism models of
international or national society as these models promote hierarchies
of human beings and of citizens within a social climate of intense
rivalry, competition, and aggressive behaviors (Tickner, 2014; cf.
hooks, 2015). A feminist perspective is alert to practices of gender
subordination that fail to cherish the well-being and security of each
individual. It focuses on egalitarian human relations, and the
nurturing of societies without violence, whether that be violence
through the militarization of relations between states or acts of
violence in interpersonal relations (Enloe, 2017). While this
perspective appreciates cultural differences, it also notes that what
often passes for “valued cultural traditions” are in fact the will of a
sexist elite being imposed on a more progressive majority. Tokyo-
based journalist and lecturer, David McNeill (2001) identifies an elite
of this kind in Japan, and he challenges the claim that Japanese civil
society lacks open debate and frank discussion of difficult issues
because the culture highly esteems harmony and consensus. In fact,
the most powerful groups in society are discouraging or suppressing
free discussion and they impose their own will on others: “This
notion of consensus, reinforced through the education system and
other state apparatus, often boils down, in practice, to the
imposition of power over dissenting, minority, and sometimes even,
majority opinions.” Also, the culturally formed proclivity for social
harmony and consensus is a gendered phenomenon. With reference
to cultural factors in Japan that inhibit speaking out on issues of
sexual abuse, Muta (2015) notes the double standard by which men
are given much more leeway regarding the social norm of
consideration for others. Women and girls are often socialized into
submissive behaviors which include never confronting others about
their toxic behavior for fear of causing trouble or hurting others’
feelings. If progress is to be made regarding issues of gender and
sexuality in Japan, many unhelpful beliefs and norms that are widely
accepted as common sense need to be revealed as impositions by a
powerful minority, which can and should be called into question.
A critical feminist approach is alert to the ways in which processes
of economic class oppression and structures of patriarchy interact in
perpetuating social inequality. When social subjects have multiple
experiences of a gender inequality mindset that subordinates women
below men and single men below fathers, the term “patriarchy” can
be used.9 It refers to a society where adult, fully abled, heterosexual
males, especially fathers, are idealized as fully human and all others
as, at least partially, incomplete humans. While the majority of
Japanese may not hyper-idealize paternal masculinity in this way,
many influential citizens, have displayed such gender discrimination.
In recent years, regular citizens, who have been drawn into online
communities of ever-increasing extremist views, have been able to
spread the ideas of high-placed ideologues of patriarchy on social
networking service (SNS) platforms, and this has had a baneful
influence on society as a whole.
The denotation of Japan as a society of patriarchal influence forms
the basis of the feminist and emancipatory perspective that shapes
the selection and interpretation of data in this work. Analysis of
Japan as a patriarchal society risks creating or reinforcing a
stereotype of the country as a place where benighted women wallow
in subordinated roles. Steel (2019, p. 1) refers to one newspaper
headline that implied that the situation for women in Japan was
worse than that for women in Saudi Arabia. In fact, Steel’s edited
collection of works from a wide range of scholars argues that most
women in Japan, far from being perennial victims, are fulfilled
human beings with high levels of well-being who have found ways to
assert their agency. This point is well taken, but many female victims
of sexual abuse and gender harassment in Japan find it extremely
difficult to break their silence, and the reasons for this difficulty need
to be interrogated. While Japanese women have power in a number
of social contexts, that does not apply to the context of sexual abuse
victimhood. Men’s sexual violence during war has often been
reduced to biological essentialist explanations, which see “wartime
rape” as a marginal issue. The discursive power of these accounts
underlines the helpfulness of a feminist IS approach, which asserts
that the role of women in national life and in international relations,
though long confined to a shadowy existence, should be revealed
and appreciated for all its significance. Insights from the field shed
light on multiple aspects of sexual violence, including the reluctance
of women in Japan to speak out about their experiences of sexual
misconduct. Obviously, women need to be aware of the support that
is available to them if they are to come out of the shadows. Due to
the actions and public conversations of Japan’s nativist right factions
(Hall, 2021) that are delineated in Chapters 3 and 4, women who
fear that their evidence of non-consensual sexual activity will not be
believed are more likely to remain silent. The existence of public
conversations in Japan that elicit this fear of being labeled as a “fake
victim” is a problem which needs to be given more comprehensive
recognition. The following chapters provide such recognition by
adopting a feminist lens to unpack the implications of an
identification of the mutual interactions between three areas:
Inter(national) identity formation, “comfort women” issues, and male
hysterical subjectivity.