SGPL - Gril - Behu 5 - 201+674 - Vup - 28.08.2023 - R0

PROJECT:
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF 4 LANE WITH PAVED SHOULDERS FROM
DESIGN CH. 182.300 TO DESIGN CH. 228.500 IN BELGAUM - HUNGUND
- RAICHUR SECTION OF NH748A (EXT. SH-20) IN THE STATE OF
KARNATAKA ON HYBRID ANNUITY MODE (PACKAGE-5)
STRUCTURE: VEHICULAR UNDERPASS
CHAINAGE: 201+674
SUBMITTED TO:
G R INFRAPROJECT LIMITED
2nd Floor, Novus Tower, Plot No 18,
Sector 18, Gurugram, Haryana-122015
Project No.: SGPL/GRIL/BEHU-5_201+674_VUP_28-08-2023_R0
PREPARED BY:
SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.

Address: Basement, commercial plot No. 1, Sadbhavana market,
Garhi Chaukhandi, Sector 121, Noida, U.P. - 201301
E-mail: spyrotechgeocon@gmail.com Mobile: +91-8858122999
Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of 4 Lane with Paved Shoulders from
Design Ch. 182.300 to Design Ch. 228.500 in Belgaum - Hungund - Raichur
Section of NH748A (Ext. SH-20) in the State of Karnataka on Hybrid Annuity
Mode (Package-5). Vehicular Underpass at Ch. 201+674
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................................................ 2
PURPOSE OF STUDY .................................................................................................................................................. 2
SCOPE OF WORK......................................................................................................................................................... 2
2.0 GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION OF THE REGION ........................................................................................... 4
GENERAL GEOLOGY OF THE AREA........................................................................................................................ 4

CLIMATE AND RAINFALL ............................................................................................................................................ 4
SIESMICITY .................................................................................................................................................................... 4
3.0 METHODOLOGY OF FIELD INVESTIGATION ............................................................................................... 5
BOREHOLES ................................................................................................................................................................. 5
STANDARD PENETRATION TESTS.......................................................................................................................... 5
S.P.T. VALUES............................................................................................................................................................... 6
DISTURBED SAMPLES................................................................................................................................................ 8
UNDISTURBED SOIL SAMPLES (UDS) .................................................................................................................... 8
ROCK CORE SAMPLES ............................................................................................................................................... 8
GROUND WATER TABLE .......................................................................................................................................... 10
4.0 LABORATORY TESTING ................................................................................................................................ 10
5.0 REFERENCE CODES ...................................................................................................................................... 11
6.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITION .......................................................................................................................... 12
VARIABILTY IN SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS....................................................................................................... 12
7.0 FOUNDATION SUPPORT................................................................................................................................ 13
ASSESSMENT OF LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL OF THE SITE......................................................................... 13

BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS FOR OPEN FOUNDATIONS IN SOIL ....................... 18
CAPACITY OF PILE BASED ON PILE SOIL ITERATION ...................................................................................... 21
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS: ................................................................................................................................... 23

Garhi Chaukhandi, Sector 121, Noida, U.P. - 201301, 1 of 24
1.0 INTRODUCTION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
M/s GR INFRAPROJECTS LIMITED has awarded the work of Geotechnical Investigation
for Construction of 4 Lane with Paved Shoulders from Design Ch. 182.300 to Design Ch.
228.500 in Belgaum - Hungund - Raichur Section of NH748A (Ext. SH-20) in the State of
Karnataka on Hybrid Annuity Mode (Package-5 to M/s SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD,
vide work order no. CO/WO/BEHU/02 and date 10/05/2023 This report presents the details of
Geotechnical investigations carried out and data obtained from various field and laboratory
tests, their presentation in graphical form.
PURPOSE OF STUDY
The overall purposes of this study are to conduct a geotechnical investigation to access
the stratigraphy and to develop geotechnical recommendations for foundation design for
the various structures planned along the alignment.
To accomplish these purposes, the study was conducted in the following phases:
i. Drilling boreholes at various structures locations to depths as specified or as per
instruction given at site in order to evaluate the stratigraphy at the site, and to collect
soil & water samples for laboratory testing.
ii. Testing selected soil samples in the laboratory to determine pertinent index and
engineering properties; and
iii. Analyzing all field and laboratory data to develop geotechnical recommendations for
foundations of the various structures to be constructed.
SCOPE OF WORK
a) Drilling bore holes by Rotary drilling up to the specified depth as per IS code of practice
and as per the direction of the Engineer-in-Charge. Beyond refusal strata drilling using
NX bit up to specified depth as per IS code of practice and as per the direction of the
Engineer-in- Charge.
b) Conducting Standard Penetration tests in the bore holes at regular intervals of 1.50m or
wherever possible as per IRC/IS Code of Practice.

c) Collecting undisturbed soil samples / core samples from the bore holes at regular
intervals or change of strata or wherever possible as per IRC/ IS Code of Practice.
d) Recording of water table level in the bore holes after completion of borehole.
Summary of Field Work at Chainage- 201+674
Borehole Span Co-ordinates Reduced Depth in Depth in Bore hole

Structure
No. Arrangement Easting, m Northing, m Level, m Soil, m Rock, m Depth, m
LBH-1 646021 1770559 541.031 2.50 12.00 14.50

Vehicular Underpass
LBH-2 646039 1770563 541.550 1.50 12.00 13.50

RBH-1 646028 1770541 540.768 4.50 9.00 13.50
RBH-2 1 x 20m 646050 1770545 541.572 3.00 12.00 15.00
BHRE-01 645905 1770557 540.885 4.50 10.50 15.00
BHRE-02 645977 1770539 540.827 3.00 12.00 15.00
BHRE-03 646092 1770569 542.301 1.50 13.50 15.00
Reference Codes (Field Investigation)

Sl.
Particulars of Properties Ref: IS Code
No.
1. Sub-Surface Investigations for Foundations IS: 1892-1979
2. Standard penetration Test IS: 2131-1981
3. Collection of Un-disturbed Samples IS: 2132-1986
4. Drilling equipment and procedure IS: 6926 – 1973
5. Presentation of drilling information and core description IS: 4464 – 1985
6. Rock quality designation IS: 11315 (Part 11) - 1985
7. Rock Core sample preservation in Core Box IS: 4078-1980

2.0 GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION OF THE REGION
GENERAL GEOLOGY OF THE AREA
The project site is located in Raichur District in the State of Karnataka.

Geomorphologically, Raichur district can be broadly classified into three major zones
viz, (a). The Northern rugged plateau, ii. (b) The Southern lower plains with inselbergs
and isolated hillocks and (c) Valley fills. Continuous range of hills are absent in the
district but a few cluster of hills are seen towards east, west, northwest, centre, and
southwest.
CLIMATE AND RAINFALL

The climate of the district can be termed as mild to severe, with mild winters and hot
summers. December is the coldest month with mean daily minimum of 17.7º C, while
May is the hottest month with mean daily maximum temperature of 39.8º C. The day
temperature in May often touches 45.0º C. Relative humidity of over 75% is common
during monsoon period. Wind speeds exceeding 15 km/h are common during the months
of June and July. The recorded annual potential evaporation is around 1950 mm with
May registering over 220 mm and December around 120 mm. The normal annual rainfall
of the district is 621 mm.
SIESMICITY
Seismicity in India is categorized in India into following four zones, Zone II: seismically
less active, zone III: moderately active, Zone IV: highly active, while the zone V
represents highest seismicity. The area under study and its surroundings are seismically
less active (mostly in seismic zone II). In seismic design zone factor, z of 0.10 is
recommended.

3.0 METHODOLOGY OF FIELD INVESTIGATION

All field work was carried out in accordance with the latest addition of the applicable code
of practice / procedures as laid down by the Bureau of Indian Standards.
Reference Codes (Field Investigation)
Sl. No. Particulars of Properties Ref: IS Code
1. Sub-Surface Investigations for Foundations IS: 1892-1979

2. Standard penetration Test IS: 2131-1981
3. Collection of Un-disturbed Samples IS: 2132-1986
4. Drilling equipment and procedure IS: 6926 – 1973
5. Presentation of drilling information and core description IS: 4464 – 1985
6. Rock quality designation IS: 11315 (Part 11) - 1985
7. Rock Core sample preservation in Core Box IS: 4078-1980
BOREHOLES
Bore-hole was selected by Engineer in charge in order to obtain comprehensive sub-soil

data for this site. Soil samples collected for different test at different levels. The sub-soil
exploration work at the proposed site was carried out manually / mechanically using 150
mm diameter shell and augur manual equipment in soft strata and power-driven
mechanical boring in hard strata using diamond cutter, as per IS: 1892- 1979.
STANDARD PENETRATION TESTS

Standard penetration test plays a major role in sub soil investigation termination of safe
bearing capacity of soil in non-cohesive type soil, particularly in non-cohesive granular
sandy soil and where the UDS could not be collected either due to high liquidity or non-
cohesive nature of soil. The SPT tests were conducted as per IS: 2131-1981
respectively. The SPT sampler was lower inside the borehole after drilling the required
level and is driven by a 63.50 kg Rammer with a free fall of 750 mm. driving 450 mm in
One stages 150 mm each and the number of blows for each 150mm penetration for 2nd
& 3rd 150 mm drive recorded as “N”. Refusal was considered for N>100. The details of
location of test and SPT value [N-value] as given in the bore-hole data sheet.

S.P.T. VALUES
Corrections – two different corrections are applied on Field SPT ‘N’ Value of Cohesion
less soil
i. Due to Over –Burden (N’) - The N value for cohesion less soil has been corrected for
overburden as: -
Fig.-1 of IS- 2131-1981

ii. Due to dilatancy (N”) - If the stratum consists of fine sand and silt below water table
for values of N’ greater than 15,
N” =15+ (N’-15)/2

CONSISTENCY / RELATIVE DENSITY OF SOIL WITH SPT VALUES:
Consistency of Cohesive Soils Density Condition of Granular Soils
SPT Value Consistency SPT Value Density Descriptor
0-2 Very Soft 0-4 Very Loose
2-4 Soft 4-10 Loose
4-8 Medium 10-30 Medium Dense
8-15 Stiff 30-50 Dense
15-30 Very Stiff >50 Very Dense
>30 Hard
Plastic Limit
Plasticity Liquid Limit
Low Plastic <35
Medium Plastic 35 to 50
High Plastic >50

DISTURBED SAMPLES
In all boreholes, disturbed soil samples were taken at every 1.50 m interval and at
significant change of stratum (or as per specified). Soil from cutting edge of undisturbed
samplers and from split spoon sampler used for standard penetration tests was taken as
disturbed samples by manually operated hammer. These samples were placed without
delay in adequately sealed polythene bags.
UNDISTURBED SOIL SAMPLES (UDS)

The UDS were collected from the boreholes at every 1.50 m interval & change of strata
as per sampling specifications, in thin-walled sampling tubes of 100 mm dia. and 450
mm length. These sampling tubes after retrieval from the boreholes were properly waxed
and sealed at both ends. These were carefully labeled and transported to the laboratory
for testing. UDS wherever slipped during lifting, were duly marked in the bore logs as
well in the soil profile.
ROCK CORE SAMPLES

Drilling was advanced by rotary core drilling method using double tube core barrels as
per the guidelines of IS: 6926-1996. A core barrel and Nx sized bits are used for drilling
and recovering rock cores. Recovered rock cores were numbered serially and preserved
in good quality sturdy wooden core boxes as specified in IS: 4078-1980. Rock core
recovery and Rock Quality Designation (RQD) were computed for every run length
drilled.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RQD AND IN-SITU ROCK QUALITY
RQD CLASSIFICATION RQD (%)
Excellent 90 to 100
Good 75 to 90
Fair 50 to 75
Poor 25 to 50
Very Poor 00 to <25

SCALE OF WEATHERING GRADES OF ROCK MASS
Descriptio Grad
Terms
n e
No visible sign of rock material weathering;
Fresh perhaps slight discoloration on major discontinuity I
surfaces.
Discoloration indicates weathering of rock material
Slightly and
Weathered discontinuity surfaces. All the rock material may be II
discoloured by weathering.
Less than half of the rock material is decomposed
or disintegrated to a soil. Fresh or discolored rock
Moderately is present either as a continuous framework or as III
Weathered corestones.
More than half of the rock material is decomposed
or disintegrated to a soil. Fresh or discolored rock
Highly is present either as a discontinuous framework or
Weathered as IV
corestones
All rock material is decomposed and / or
Completely
disintegrated to soil. The original mass structure is V
Weathered
still largely intact.
All rock material is converted to soil. The mass
structure and material fabric are destroyed. There
Residual is a large VI
Soil change in volume, but the soil has not been
significantly transported.
CLASSIFICATION OF ROCK WITH RESPECT TO COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE
ROCK TYPE STRENGTH
(UCS) in MPa
Extremely Strong > 200
Very Strong 100 to 200
Strong 50 to 100
Moderately
12.5 to 50
strong
Moderately Weak 5 to 12.5
Weak 1.25 to 5
Very Weak < 1.25

GROUND WATER TABLE
Water Table at the Site was not encountered up to 20.00 metre depth explored below
ground level on the day of soil investigation during the month of June 2023. However,
the existing water table may rise by some amount in the post-monsoon period. As per
CGWB report, the design water level shall be conservatively considered at 5.00m below
ground level.
4.0 LABORATORY TESTING

The following laboratory tests were conducted to determine the engineering
characteristics of sub-soils on selected soil samples from boreholes. Laboratory testing
was carried out in accordance with the latest addition of the applicable code of practice
or procedures as laid down by the Bureau of Indian Standards. List of applicable codes
are as below.
Laboratory Test IS Code Referred
Dry & Bulk Density IS: 2720 (Part-29)-1975, RA-2020
Natural Moisture content IS: 2720 (Part-2)-1973, RA-2020
Specific Gravity IS: 2720 (Part-3)-1980, RA-2021
Grain size analysis IS: 2720 (Part-4)-1985, RA-2020
Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit IS: 2720 (Part-5)-1985, RA-2020
Shrinkage Limit IS: 2720 (Part-6)-1972, RA-2021
Free swell Index IS: 2720 (Part-40)-1977, RA-2021
Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial shear Test IS: 2720 (Part-11)-1993, RA-2021
Direct Shear Test IS: 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2021
Consolidation Test IS: 2720 (Part-15)-1986, RA-2021

DEFINATION OF ACRONYMS
CH - Silty clay of High plasticity CI - Silty clay of medium plasticity
CL - Silty clay of Low plasticity MH - Clay silt of High plasticity
MI - Clay silt of medium plasticity ML - Clay silt of Low plasticity
ML - Sandy Silt SM - Silty Sand, SC - Clayey Sand
SW/SP - Well/Poorly graded sand SM-SP - Poorly graded sand-silt mixture
EGL - Existing ground level. BGL - below ground level
5.0 REFERENCE CODES

All field work/Laboratory tests were carried out in accordance with the latest addition of
the applicable code of practice / procedures as lay down by the Bureau of Indian
Standards. List of applicable codes are as below,
Sr. No. Ref: IS CODE PARTICULARS OF PROPERTIES
1 IS:1892-1979 Code of Practice for subsurface investigation for foundations
2 IRC: SP-114-2016 Guidelines for Seismic Design of Road Bridges
3 IS:1893(Part-1)-2016 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures
Code of Practice for determination of Bearing Capacity of

4 IS: 6403-1981
Shallow Foundations
Code of Practice for
5 IS: 8009(Part I)-1976
Calculation of Settlement of Foundations
Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road
6 IRC:78-2014
Bridges
7 IRC:78 PART 2-2020 Code of Practice on Limit State Design for Foundations
IS:2911(Part-1/Sec-2)- Design and Construction of Pile Foundations Code of

8
2010 Practice
Permissible Maximum Settlement, Differential Settlement and
9 IS: 1904-1986
Angular Distortion

6.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITION
GENERAL NATURE OF SOIL STRATA
Design Parameter
Bore Thickness, Observed ϒSat,
Strata Description C,
Hole No. m ‘N’ Value gm/cm3 Ø°
kg/cm2
LBH-1 0.00-2.50 Silty Sand ‘SM’ 56 1.85 0.00 30
LBH-2 0.00-1.50 Poorly graded gravel ‘GM-GP’ Ref 1.81 0.00 31
0.00-0.50 Silty Sand ‘SM’ - - - -
RBH-1 0.50-3.00 Silty Clay ‘CI’ 16 1.93 0.50 4
3.00-4.50 Sandy silt ‘ML’ 34-40 1.83 0.00 31
RBH-2 0.00-3.00 Silty Sand ‘SM’ 56-57 1.82 0.00 31
0.00-2.50 Silty Clay ‘CI’ 14 1.96 0.50 5
BHRE-1 2.50-4.00 Silty Clay ‘CI’ 17 1.94 0.45 7
4.00-4.50 Silty Sand ‘SM’ 20 1.81 0.00 31
0.00-1.45 Silty Clay ‘CH’ - 1.96 0.50 2
BHRE-2
1.45-3.00 Silty Clay ‘CI’ 23 1.94 0.50 6
0.00-0.50 Silty Sand ‘SM’ - - - -
BHRE-3
0.50-1.50 Poorly graded sand ‘SM-SP’ 50 1.79 0.00 30
VARIABILTY IN SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

Subsurface conditions encountered during construction may vary somewhat from the
conditions encountered during the site investigation. In case significant variations are
encountered during construction, we request to be notified so that our engineers may
review the recommendations in this report in light of these variations.

7.0 FOUNDATION SUPPORT
ASSESSMENT OF LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL OF THE SITE

 General
Condition of decrease in the shear strength and/or stiffness caused by the increase in
pore water pressures in saturated cohesion less materials during earthquake ground
motion is referred to as liquefaction. It gives rise to significant permanent deformations
or even to condition of near-zero effective stress in the soil.
 Consideration
The following information has been considered in the Liquefaction calculation
 Project Site lies in = Zone II
[IS-1893 Part-1: 2016 / Fig. 1]
 Peak Ground Acceleration =0.10
[IS-1893 Part-1: 2016 / table: 3]
 Magnitude of Earthquake = 6.00
[IS-1893 Part-1: 2016 / Annex: 1]
 Methodology
Liquefaction potential shall be evaluated by well-established methods of geotechnical
engineering, based on field correlations between in situ measurements and the critical
cyclic shear stresses known to have caused liquefaction during past earthquakes.
Liquefaction potential may be estimated by calculating the factor of safety (FOS),
This is given as,
Where, CRR = Cyclic resistance Ratio

CSR = Cyclic Stress Ratio
 The soil shall be considered as liquefiable if, FOS < 1
 Cyclic Resistance Ratio [CRR]
The cyclic resistance is to be calculated from measured blow count values of Standard
Penetration Testing (SPT), suitably modified with different correction factors.

The corrected SPT blow count is represented by N1(60) for hammer efficiency of 60
percent and is evaluated from the expression below
N1(60) = N C60 .CN
Where,
N = field SPT count
C60 = CE x CBD x CRL x CSS= Correction factors for SPT configuration
CN = Correction for Overburden pressure limited to 1.70
CN = (Pa/ ) 0.5
Pa = 1 Atmospheric pressure = 10t/sqm
= Vertical effective stress at the depth of SPT
CE = For SPT conducted as per IS 2131-1981, the energy delivered to the drill rod is
about 60 percent may be assumed as 1.
 The effect of borehole diameter is taken into account using factor CBD
Borehole Dimeter, mm Term Correction Factor

65 CBD 1.00
115 CBD 1.00
150 CBD 1.05
200 CBD 1.15
For different rod lengths, the rod length correction factor CRL
 Rod length (m) Correction Factor (CRL)
Rod Length, m Correction Factor (CRL)
<3 0.75
3-4 0.80
4-6 0.85
6-10 0.95
>10 1.00

 The correction factor CSS for different sampling methods is taken 1.1 for Sampler
without liners.
The presence of Fines Content (FC) in percent can also result in an increase of cyclic
resistance of soils. For the presence of fines, the SPT value is to be modified to
N1(60)cs as follows –
N1(60) cs=α+β*(N1(60))
For Fine Content<=5, α =0 and β =1
For (Fine Content>5 and <35), α = EXP ((1.76-(190/FC2)) and β = (0.99+ (FC1.5/1000)
For Fine Content>35, α =5 and β =1.2

Where, Fc = fineness content percentage
 CRR, for 7.5 magnitude earthquake, is to be evaluated from N1(60)cs using the
following Expression:
The above expression is valid only for earthquakes with magnitude of 7.5. For
earthquakes with different magnitudes, the calculated CRR 7.5 is to be corrected by
CRR = (CRR7.5). (MSF). K . Kα
Where,
Magnitude scaling Factor
The correction for high overburden stresses K is required when overburden pressure
is high (depth>15m) and using the following equation:
)(f-1)

Where, ’vo effective overburden pressure and Pa atmospheric pressure are measured
in the Same units and f is an exponent and its value depends on the relative density Dr.
for Dr =40%- 60%, f=0.8-0.7 and for Dr =60%-80%, f=0.7-0.6.
The correction for static shear stresses Kα is required only for sloping ground and shall
be assumed 1.0 otherwise.
 Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR)
The cyclic stress ratio at a particular depth can be calculated as
av =Average equivalent uniform shear stress generated by earthquake assumed to be
0.65 of the maximum induced stress,
a max = Peak ground acceleration (PGA), in terms of g

’vo= Initial effective vertical (overburden) stress at the depth
vo = Total overburden stress at the same depth,
g = Acceleration due to gravity
rd = Shear stress reduction coefficient to adjust for flexibility of the soil profile
 As per IRC 2017: Sp-114
The factor rd can be evaluated for any depth z from the following expression
rd = 1.0 - .00765z for z ≤ 9.15 m
rd= 1.174 – 0.0267z for 9.15m < z ≤ 20.00m
Where, z = depth below the ground surface in meters
To Evict the Depth limitation of 20.00m, we have calculated the Shear stress reduction
coefficient rd
As per – T. F. Blake (1996) approximated the value by the following equation-
rd

Where, z = depth beneath the ground surface in meters.

 The liquefaction hazards may be neglected when at least one of the following
conditions is fulfilled-
a) The sands have a clay content greater than 25% with Plasticity Index PI>10.
b) The sands have silt contents greater than 35% and corrected N value more than 20.
c) The sands are clean with corrected N value more than 30.
[Ref. IRC: SP-114-2018, Cl. No.-8.4.4]
Summary of Liquefiable Depth below EGL (m)
Calculated
Liquefaction Termination Depth
Sl. No. Borehole Number
Depth below EGL (m) of Borehole (m)
1 LBH-1 Not Found 14.50
2 LBH-2 Not Found 13.50
3 RBH-1 Not Found 13.50
4 RBH-2 Not Found 15.00
5 BHRE-01 Not Found 15.00

BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS FOR OPEN FOUNDATIONS

IN SOIL
Bearing capacity analysis was carried out based on the shear parameters (c- Ф), as
interpreted from field and laboratory tests to determine the safe net bearing capacity
(shear criterion).
The bearing capacity equation used is as follows:
QNet Ultimate = cNCSCDCIC+q(Nq-1)SqDqIq+(1/2) BϒNϒSϒDϒIϒW'
where:
QNet Ultimate = net Ultimate bearing capacity of soil, based on the shear failure
criterion.
c = cohesion intercept,
q = overburden pressure
ϒ = Total unit weight of soil
B = Width of Foundation
W' = Water table correction factor
NC, Nq, Nϒ = Bearing capacity factors which are a function of
Sc, Sq, Sϒ = Shape factors. For Strip footings, Sc = Sq = Sϒ = 1

For Square footing = Sc = 1.3, Sq = 1.2, Sϒ = 0.6
dc, dq, dϒ = Depth factors
For Ф< 10, dc = 1 + 0.2 tan (45 + Ф /2) D/B, dq = dϒ = 1

For Ф > 10, dq = dϒ = 1 + 0.1 tan (45 + Ф / 2) D/B
Appropriate values have been substituted into the bearing capacity equation given
above to compute the safe net bearing capacity. The values have been checked to
determine the settlement of the foundation under the safe bearing pressure. The
allowable bearing pressure has been taken as the lower of the two values computed
from the bearing capacity shear failure criterion as well as that computed from the
tolerable settlement criterion.

In predominantly granular soils, settlement analysis has been performed based on the
SPT values in accordance with Clause 9.1.4 of IS 8009 (Part 1) - 1976 Fig.9.
Where applicable (typically where substantial incremental stresses are anticipated in

cohesive strata below groundwater table), settlement analysis has been performed
based on classical theory; as the sum of elastic settlement and consolidation
settlements. The elastic settlement is calculated in accordance with Clause 9.2.3 of IS
8009 Part 1-1976. The consolidation settlement is computed in accordance with Clause
9.2.2 of IS 8009 (Part 1)-1976.
BEARING CAPACITY OF OPEN FOUNDATIONS ON ROCK
Analysis for allowable bearing capacity on rock has been done by the following
four methods.
a) Based on Classification of Rock as per Table-2 of IS: 12070: Satisfies both Shear
and Settlement Criterion (For preliminary assessment)
b) Based on rock mass rating (RMR value): Satisfies Settlement Criteria

c) Based on compressive strength of intact rock specimen using the procedure
given in IS: 12070: Satisfies Shear Criteria.
SAFE BEARING PRESSURE BASED ON CLASSIFICATION OF ROCK
Safe bearing Pressure based on classification of rock is given by IS: 12070 is

reproduced below
MATERIAL qns ( t/m2 )
Massive crystalline bedrock including granite, diorite, gneiss, trap rock 1000
Foliated rocks such as schist or slate in sound condition 400
Bedded limestone in sound condition 400
Sedimentary rock, including-hard shales and sandstones 250

SAFE BEARING PRESSURE FROM THE RMR SYSTEM
Analysis has been carried out using the RMR also known as Geo-mechanics
classification by considering various parameters such as uni-axial compressive strength,
RQD, spacing and condition of discontinuities and ground water condition. The
correlation between the RMR value and allowable pressure has been given in Table –3
IS: 12070. This will ensure settlement of raft foundation to be less than 12 mm
Classification No I II III IV V
Description of Rock Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor
RMR 100-81 80-61 60-41 40-21 20-0
Q ns (T/m2) 600-448 448-288 280-141 135 - 48 45-30
The RMR for use in Table should be the average within a depth below foundation level
equal to the width of foundation, provided the RMR is fairly uniform within the depth. If
the upper part of the rock, within a depth of about one fourth of the width of foundation, is
of lower quality the value of this part should be used or the inferior rock should be
removed. Since these values are based on limiting the settlement, they should not be
increased if the foundation is embedded into the rock.
SAFE BEARING CAPACITY OF OPEN FOUNDATION IN COMPLETELY TO

HIGHLY WEATHERED / HIGHLY FRACTURED ROCK
For Calculating SBC, Highly weathered / highly fractured rock (HWR) with low core
recoveries and almost Nil RQD shall be considered as Hard Soil as per IRC 78, Clause
706.3.1.1.2.

CAPACITY OF PILE BASED ON PILE SOIL INTERACTION

AXIAL CAPACITY OF PILES IN SOIL
Axial load carrying capacity of pile is initially determined by calculating resistance from
end bearing at toe/tip or wall friction/skin friction along pile surface or both. Based on
soil data, the ultimate load carrying capacity (Qu) is given by;
Qu = Ru + Rf
where;
Ru = Ultimate base resistance, Rf = Ultimate shaft resistance
Ru = Ap (1/2 D .Y. NY + Pd. Nq) = Ap Nc Cp
Ap = cross-sectional area of pile tip, in m2;
D = diameter of pile shaft, in m
Y = effective unit weight of the soil, in t/ m3
Nq & Ny= bearing capacity factors depending upon the angle of internal friction
Nc = bearing capacity factor, usually taken as 9
Cp = average cohesion at pile tip, in t/ m2
Pd = effective overburden pressure at pile tip in t/ m2
Rf = ∑(Ks.Pdi.tan δ)Asi +∑(α.c.As) Asi
Ks = coefficient of earth pressure

PDi = effective overburden pressure for the ith layer, in t/m2 along the embedment of pile
for the layer
δ = angle of wall friction between pile and soil in degrees. It may be taken equal to
angle of internal friction of soil
Asi = surface area of pile shaft in m2
α = adhesion factor
c = average cohesion in t/m2 throughout the embedded length of pile

UPLIFT CAPACITY OF PILES IN SOIL
The Ultimate uplift capacity may be calculated with the expression of shaft
resistance/skin friction only, of the static formulae for compression loads and applying a
reduction factor of 0.70 on the same. The weight of pile shall also be taken as acting
against uplift (Clause 709.3.6.2 of IRC: 78-2014).
LATERAL LOAD CAPACITY
The Lateral Load Capacity of Pile is computed in accordance with Clause 6.5.2 of
IS: 2911 (Part 1/Sec 2)-2010.
The unsupported length is calculated by considering the difference between the Cut-off
level and maximum Scour Level/Liquefiable level.

8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on soil design parameters, calculations attached in Annexure –I
OPEN FOUNDATION:
Depth of
Chainage, kM
Arrangement Base of
Size of Foundation
Net Allowable Bearing
Structure
Hole No.
Span
Bore
Foundation Capacity
Below NGL (T/m2)
(m) Length (m) Width (m)
2.50 13.50 3.50 39.00
3.00 13.50 3.50 45.00

LBH-1
3.50 13.50 3.50 45.00
4.00 13.50 3.50 45.00
2.50 13.50 3.50 50.00
3.00 13.50 3.50 50.00

LBH-2
3.50 13.50 3.50 50.00
Vehicular Underpass
4.00 13.50 3.50 50.00

201+674
1 x 20 m
2.50 13.50 3.50 14.00
3.00 13.50 3.50 30.00

RBH-1
3.50 13.50 3.50 30.00
4.00 13.50 3.50 30.00
2.50 13.50 3.50 30.00
3.00 13.50 3.50 35.00

RBH-2
3.50 13.50 3.50 35.00
4.00 13.50 3.50 35.00

Depth of
Chainage, kM
Base of Net Allowable
Structure
Hole No.
Width of RCC Strip
Bore
Foundation Bearing Capacity
(m)
Below NGL (T/m2)
(m)
1.00 0.75 15.00

BHRE-1
1.00 0.90 14.00
1.00 0.75
RE WALL
11.00
201+674
BHRE-2
1.00 0.90 10.00
1.00 0.75 20.00

BHRE-3
1.00 0.90 21.00
The above recommendations are based on the field investigation data results and the
laboratory tests results of the samples collected from the test locations and our
experience in this regard. If the actual sub-soil conditions during excavation for the
foundations differ from that has been reported, a reference should be made to us for
suggestions.
Er. Rahul Yadav

Spyrotech Geocon Pvt. Ltd.

Following details are attached in Annexure …..…
I. Bearing capacity calculations
II. Sub-surface profile
III. Drill-Log
IV. RMR Calculation Sheet
V. Borehole Location
VI. Core Box and Site photographs
ANNEXURE I

Estimation of Allowable Safe Bearing Capacity of "Open Foundation"
(As Per IS : 6403-1981)
Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of 4 Lane with Paved Shoulders from Design Ch. 182.300 to Design Ch. 228.500 in Belgaum - Hungund - Raichur Section of NH748A
Name of Project
(Ext. SH-20) in the State of Karnataka on Hybrid Annuity Mode (Package-5)
Chainage, Km 201+674 Borehole No. RBH-1 Water Table below borehole level, m Not-Met
Structure VUP Borehole Depth, m 15.00 Post monsoon rise (as per CGWB), m -
Reduced Level, m 540.768 Water table used for calculation ,m 5.00
Qnet=(1/FOS)*(cNCSCDCIC+q(Nq-1)SqDqIq+(1/2) BϒNϒSϒDϒIϒW')
Qnet = Safe Bearing Capacity c = cohesion intercept q = overburden pressure ϒ = Bulk density of soil below foundation level
NC, Nq, Nϒ = Bearing capacity factors DC, Dq, Dϒ = Depth factors SC, Sq, Sϒ = Shape factors W' = Water table correction factor
Density Above Density Below Angle of Shearing

Foundation Cohesion, kg/cm 2
Foundation Level Foundation Level Resistance,Φ ° Void Ratio
FOUNDATION SOIL Soil Layer
PARAMETER : (gm/cm 3) kN/m 3 (gm/cm 3) kN/m 3 GSF LSF GSF LSF
ML 1.93 18.93 1.93 18.93 0.500 0.333 4.00 2.68 0.612
Effective Surcharge, kN/m 2 = 47.32 Depth, m cohesion ø ϒbulk

Layer No.
2
Factor of Saftey = 2.50 From To kg/cm deg. gm/cm 3
1 0.00 3.00 0.50 4 1.93
2 3.00 4.50 0.00 31 1.83
STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS :
Type of Foundation : OPEN FOUNDATION Size of Foundation :
Shape of Foundation : RECTANGULAR Width, m 3.50
Depth of Base of Foundation below EGL, m : 2.50 Length, m 13.50
- -
Depth of Shear Zone Below Foundation Base,[ (1/2)B*tan(45+(Φ/2)], m : 1.88
Water Table Correction Factor, W' (IS : 6403 Cl. No. - 5.1.2.3): 0.86
BEARING CAPACITY FACTOR :

FOR GENERAL SHEAR FAILURE ;
NC = 6.15 Nq = 1.43 Nϒ = 0.34
FOR LOCAL SHEAR FAILURE ;
NC' = 5.77 Nq ' = 1.27 Nϒ ' = 0.21
SHAPE FACTORS :
SC = 1.05 Sq = 1.05 Sϒ = 0.90
DEPTH FACTORS :
DC = 1.15 Dq = 1.00 Dϒ = 1.00
DC' = 1.15 Dq ' = 1.00 Dϒ ' = 1.00
INCLINATION FACTOR :
IC = 1.00 Iq = 1.00 Iϒ = 1.00
FAILURE CRITERIA INTERMEDIATE SHEAR FAILURE
Ultimate Net Bearinng Capacity,

Foundation Dimension, m Net Safe Bearing
Depth of Foundation, m Shape of Foundation KN/m2
Capacity, KN/m2
Width, m Length, m GSF LSF ISF
3.50 13.50 2.50 RECTANGULAR 394.8369 246.94466 348.99 139.60
* GSF-General Shear Failure, LSF- Local Shear Failure, ISF- Intermediate Shear Failure
ANNEXURE I

(As Per IS : 6403-1981)
Name of Project
Chainage 201+674 Borehole RBH-1 Water Table below borehole level, m Not-Met
Qnet = Safe Bearing Capacity c = cohesion intercept q = overburden pressure ϒ = Bulkdensity of soil below foundation level
NC, Nq, Nϒ = Bearing capacity factors DC, Dq, Dϒ= Depth factors SC, Sq, Sϒ= Shape factors W' = Water table correction factor

Foundation Cohesion, kG/cm 2
PARAMETER : (gm/cm 3) kN/M3 (gm/cm 3) kN/M3 GSF LSF GSF LSF
ML 1.93 18.93 1.83 17.95 0.000 0.000 31.00 21.93 0.613

Layer No.
2
1 0.00 3.00 0.50 4 1.93
2 3.00 4.50 0.00 31 1.83
- -
Depth of Shear Zone Below Foundation Base,[ (1/2)B*tan(45+(Φ/2)], m 3.09

NC = 32.67 Nq = 20.63 Nϒ = 25.99
NC' = 16.82 Nq ' = 7.77 Nϒ ' = 7.06
SHAPE FACTORS :
SC = 1.05 Sq = 1.05 Sϒ = 0.90
DEPTH FACTORS :
DC = 1.3 Dq = 1.15 Dϒ = 1.15
DC' = 1.25 Dq ' = 1.13 Dϒ ' = 1.13
IC = 1.00 Iq = 1.00 Iϒ = 1.00

Foundation Dimension Net Safe Bearing
Capacity, KN/m2
3.50 13.50 3.00 RECTANGULAR 2009.3101 633.34694 1575.88 630.35
ANNEXURE I

(As Per IS : 6403-1981)
Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of 4 Lane with Paved Shoulders from Design Ch. 182.300 to Design Ch. 228.500 in Belgaum - Hungund - Raichur Section o
Name of Project
NH748A (Ext. SH-20) in the State of Karnataka on Hybrid Annuity Mode (Package-5)
Structure VUP Borehole Depth, m 15 Assumed post monsoon rise, m -
Qnet=(1/FOS)*(cNCSCDCIC+qNq-1SqDqIq+(1/2) BϒNϒSϒDϒIϒW')

ML 1.93 18.93 1.83 17.95 0.00 0.00 31 21.93 0.613

Layer No.
2
1 0.00 3.00 0.50 4 1.93
2 3.00 4.50 0.00 31 1.83
- -

NC = 32.67 Nq = 20.63 Nϒ = 25.99
NC' = 16.82 Nq ' = 7.77 Nϒ ' = 7.06
SHAPE FACTORS :
SC = 1.05 Sq = 1.05 Sϒ = 0.90
DEPTH FACTORS :
DC = 1.35 Dq = 1.18 Dϒ = 1.18
DC' = 1.3 Dq ' = 1.15 Dϒ ' = 1.15
IC = 1.00 Iq = 1.00 Iϒ = 1.00

Capacity, KN/m2
3.50 13.50 3.50 RECTANGULAR 2230.7936 705.78334 1750.42 700.17
ANNEXURE I

(As Per IS : 6403-1981)
Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of 4 Lane with Paved Shoulders from Design Ch. 182.300 to Design Ch. 228.500 in Belgaum - Hungund - Raichur Section o
Name of Project
NH748A (Ext. SH-20) in the State of Karnataka on Hybrid Annuity Mode (Package-5)
Structure VUP Borehole Depth, m 15 Assumed post monsoon rise, m -
Qnet=(1/FOS)*(cNCSCDCIC+qNq-1SqDqIq+(1/2) BϒNϒSϒDϒIϒW')

ML 1.93 18.93 1.83 17.95 0.00 0.00 31 21.93 0.613

Layer No.
2
1 0.00 3.00 0.50 4 1.93
2 3.00 4.50 0.00 31 1.83
- -

NC = 32.67 Nq = 20.63 Nϒ = 25.99
NC' = 16.82 Nq ' = 7.77 Nϒ ' = 7.06
SHAPE FACTORS :
SC = 1.05 Sq = 1.05 Sϒ = 0.90
DEPTH FACTORS :
DC = 1.4 Dq = 1.20 Dϒ = 1.20
DC' = 1.34 Dq ' = 1.17 Dϒ ' = 1.17
IC = 1.00 Iq = 1.00 Iϒ = 1.00

Capacity, KN/m2
3.50 13.50 4.00 RECTANGULAR 2440.2881 780.26605 1917.38 766.95
ANNEXURE I

(As Per IS : 6403-1981)
Name of Project
Chainage, Km 201+674 Borehole No. RBH-2 Water Table below borehole level, m Not-Met

Foundation Cohesion, kg/cm 2
PARAMETER : (gm/cm 3) kN/m 3 (gm/cm 3) kN/m 3 GSF LSF GSF LSF
SM 1.82 17.85 1.82 17.85 0.000 0.000 31.00 21.93 0.566

Layer No.
2
1 0.00 2.50 0.00 31 1.82
2 2.50 3.00 0.00 31 1.82
- -
Depth of Shear Zone Below Foundation Base,[ (1/2)B*tan(45+(Φ/2)], m : 3.09

NC = 32.67 Nq = 20.63 Nϒ = 25.99
NC' = 16.82 Nq ' = 7.77 Nϒ ' = 7.06
SHAPE FACTORS :
SC = 1.05 Sq = 1.05 Sϒ = 0.90
DEPTH FACTORS :
DC = 1.25 Dq = 1.13 Dϒ = 1.13
DC' = 1.21 Dq ' = 1.11 Dϒ ' = 1.11
IC = 1.00 Iq = 1.00 Iϒ = 1.00

Foundation Dimension, m Net Safe Bearing
Capacity, KN/m2
3.50 13.50 2.50 RECTANGULAR 1745.8272 540.74421 1649.42 659.77
ANNEXURE I
Estimation of Allowable Safe Bearing Capacity
(As Per IS : 6403-1981)
Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of 4 Lane with Paved Shoulders from Design Ch. 182.300 to Design Ch. 228.500 in Belgaum - Hungund - Raichur Section of
NAME OF PROJECT
NH748A (Ext. SH-20) in the State of Karnataka on Hybrid Annuity Mode (Package-5) SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.
BOREHOLE BHRE-1 Depth of borehole , m 15.00 Water table below borehole level (m) Not-met Factor of safety 2.50
Water table used for calculation (m) 5.00 Assumed post monsoon rise (m) -
Density Below Foundation Level,

Width of Annular Raft, m/Width
Angle of Shearing Resistance,

Density Including water effect,
Net Safe Bearing Capacity,

2
Density Above Foundation
Shape Factors
Effective Surcharge, kN/m
Outer Dia, m / Length, m
Bearing Capacity Factors Depth Factors

Inner Dia, m / Width, m/
Depth of Foundation, m
2
(For Local Shear )Ø'
2
General shear, kN/m
Intermediate, kN/m
2
Local shear, kN/m

Cohesion, Kg/cm
Level, (gm/cc)
Void Ratio, e
Diametre, m
of Strip, m
(kN/m )
(kN/m )
(gm/cc)
S. No.
2
Type of For General Shear For Local Shear For General Shear For Local Shear
kN/m
Ø'
foundation Failure Failure Failure Failure
Nc Nq Nγ Nc' Nq' Nγ' Sc Sq Sγ Dc Dq Dγ Dc' Dq' Dγ'
1 STRIP 1.00 - - 0.75 1.96 19.22 1.96 19.22 0.50 5 3.35 0.612 19.22 6.52 1.57 0.45 6.00 1.35 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.29 1.00 1.00 1.28 1.00 1.00 426.95 260.30 375.29 150.12
2 STRIP 1.00 - - 0.90 1.96 19.22 1.96 19.22 0.50 5 3.35 0.612 19.22 6.52 1.57 0.45 6.00 1.35 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.24 1.00 1.00 1.24 1.00 1.00 412.09 251.46 362.29 144.92
ANNEXURE I
(As Per IS : 6403-1981)
NAME OF PROJECT



2
Shape Factors

2
2
General shear, kN/m
Intermediate, kN/m
2
Local shear, kN/m

Cohesion, Kg/cm
Level, (gm/cc)
Void Ratio, e
Diametre, m
of Strip, m
(kN/m )
(kN/m )
(gm/cc)
S. No.
2
kN/m
Ø'
1 STRIP 1.00 - - 0.75 1.96 19.22 1.96 19.22 0.50 2 1.34 0.684 19.22 5.73 1.20 0.15 5.46 1.13 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.28 1.00 1.00 1.27 1.00 1.00 363.51 230.53 274.41 109.76
2 STRIP 1.00 - - 0.90 1.96 19.22 1.96 19.22 0.50 2 1.34 0.684 19.22 5.73 1.20 0.15 5.46 1.13 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.23 1.00 1.00 1.23 1.00 1.00 350.80 222.55 264.87 105.95
ANNEXURE I
(As Per IS : 6403-1981)
NAME OF PROJECT



2
Shape Factors

2
2
General shear, kN/m
Intermediate, kN/m
2
Local shear, kN/m

Cohesion, Kg/cm
Level, (gm/cc)
Void Ratio, e
Diametre, m
of Strip, m
(kN/m )
(kN/m )
(gm/cc)
S. No.
2
kN/m
Ø'
1 STRIP 1.00 - - 0.75 1.79 17.55 1.79 17.55 0.00 30 21.15 0.576 17.55 30.14 18.40 22.40 15.97 7.18 6.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.46 1.23 1.23 1.39 1.19 1.19 557.51 179.26 508.34 203.33
2 STRIP 1.00 - - 0.90 1.79 17.55 1.79 17.55 0.00 30 21.15 0.576 17.55 30.14 18.40 22.40 15.97 7.18 6.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.38 1.19 1.19 1.32 1.16 1.16 575.25 184.07 524.40 209.76
ANNEXURE I

Bearing Capacity Analysis for Open Foundation on Rocks
Analysis as per IS 12070-1987 RA 2020
Chainage, KM 201+674 Bore Hole No. LBH-1
Bearing Capacity Analysis for Open Foundations bearing on rock :

1) Presumptive Values of safe bearing capacity as per Clause 5.2 of IS 12070-1987
2) Based on RMR value as per Clause 5.3 of IS 12070-1987
3) Based on UCS value : Clause 6.2 of IS 12070 - 1987
Rock Type : MWR Foundation Depth = 2.50 m

(Below Founding Level) Length of Footing = 13.50 m
Width of Footing = 3.50 m
Net safe Bearing Pressure (qns) Based on Classification :
Material qnet safe, t/m2

Massive crystalline bed rock including granite, dioritr, gneiss, trap rock 1000
Foliated rocks such as schists or slate in sound condition 400
bedded lime stone in sound condition 400
sedimentary rock, including hard shales and sandstones 250
soft or broken bed rock (excluding shale) and soft limestone 100
soft shale 30
qns safe = 1000 t/m2
Net safe Bearing Pressure Based on RMR :
Class of rock I II III IV V

RMR 100-81 80-61 60-41 40-21 20-0
2
qnet safe (t/m ) 600-448 440-288 280-141 135-48 45-30
RMR value for design = 32
qns safe = 98.37 t/m2
Estimate of Safe Bearing Pressure from the Core Strength :

qs = qc Nj
qs = Safe Bearing capacity
qc = UCS of rock cores 31.9 MPa
Nj = Empirical cofficient depeding on Spacing of discontinuties
Point Load Index 1.45 MPa
NJ = 0.10 as per IS 12070 Table No. 4 (clause 6.2)
Factors Use For Calculation

1) Submerged Condition Under Water Table 0.50
2) cavities 0.50
3) slopi 0.50
qs = 39.88 t/m2
2
Recommended Safe Bearing Capacity = 39.88 t/m
ANNEXURE I


Rock Type : MWR Foundation Depth = 3.00m to 4.00m


2
Material qnet safe, t/m
soft shale 30
2
qns safe = 1000 t/m

RMR 100-81 80-61 60-41 40-21 20-0
2
qnet safe (t/m ) 600-448 440-288 280-141 135-48 45-30

qs = qc Nj

2) cavities 0.50
3) slopi 0.50
qs = 45.38 t/m2
2
ANNEXURE I


Rock Type : MWR Foundation Depth = 2.50 m to 4.00 m


2
Material qnet safe, t/m
soft shale 30
qns safe = 1000 t/m2

RMR 100-81 80-61 60-41 40-21 20-0
2
qnet safe (t/m ) 600-448 440-288 280-141 135-48 45-30

qs = qc Nj

2) cavities 0.50
3) slopi 0.50
qs = 52.80 t/m2
2
ANNEXURE I

SETTLEMENT CALCULATION AS PER IS 8009 (PART 1) : 1976
Bore Hole No. RBH-1 Shape of open foundation RECTANGULAR Settlement effective zone depth 1.5 x Width
2
Depth of Open Foundation, m 2.50 Applied Pressure, kN/m 139.60 Water Table depth for calculation, m 5.00
Width, m 3.50 Depth factor 0.91
Length, m 13.50 - - Rigidity factor 0.80
Consolidation settlement,
Water Correction factor,
Immediate settlement,
Compression Index, Cc
Layer Start depth, (m)
Layer End depth, (m)
Increment stress, ΔP
Layer Thickness, (m)
Settlement for Unit

Density, (gms/cm )
Effective stress, Pₒ
Corrected SPT, N''
3
Total settlement
Pressure, (mm)
Type of Layer
Void Raito, e
Layer No.
(kN/m )
(kN/m )
2
(mm)
(mm)
W'
1 CLAY 0.00 2.50 2.50 1.93 Depth of Foundation
2 CLAY 2.50 3.00 0.50 1.93 0.612 0.117 - 52.05 127.92 - - 19.553 - 20.11
3 SAND 3.00 4.50 1.50 1.83 - - 41.25 70.24 117.79 0.068 1.000 - 8.067
ANNEXURE I

Bore Hole No. BHRE-1 Shape of open foundation STRIP Settlement effective zone depth 1.5 x Width
2
Width of Strip, m 0.75 Depth factor 1.00
- - - - Rigidity factor 0.80
Settlement for Unit

Density, (gms/cm )
Corrected SPT, N''
3
Total settlement
Pressure, (mm)
Type of Layer
Void Raito, e
Layer No.
(kN/m )
(kN/m )
2
(mm)
(mm)
W'
38.94
2 CLAY 1.00 2.13 1.13 1.96 0.612 0.119 - 30.03 85.78 - - 48.680 -
ANNEXURE I

2
Settlement for Unit

Density, (gms/cm )
Corrected SPT, N''
3
Total settlement
Pressure, (mm)
Type of Layer
Void Raito, e
Layer No.
(kN/m )
(kN/m )
2
(mm)
(mm)
W'
44.08
2 CLAY 1.00 2.35 1.35 1.96 0.612 0.119 - 32.20 82.81 - - 55.103 -
ANNEXURE I

2
Settlement for Unit

Density, (gms/cm )
Corrected SPT, N''
3
Total settlement
Pressure, (mm)
Type of Layer
Void Raito, e
Layer No.
(kN/m )
(kN/m )
2
(mm)
(mm)
W'
34.02
2 CLAY 1.00 2.13 1.13 1.96 0.684 0.130 - 30.03 62.72 - - 42.531 -
ANNEXURE I

Depth of Open Foundation, m 1.00 Applied Pressure, kN/m2 105.95 Water Table depth for calculation, m 5.00
Settlement for Unit

Density, (gms/cm )
Corrected SPT, N''
3
Total settlement
Pressure, (mm)
Type of Layer
Void Raito, e
Layer No.
(kN/m )
(kN/m )
2
(mm)
(mm)
W'
38.31
2 CLAY 1.00 2.35 1.35 1.96 0.684 0.130 - 32.20 60.54 - - 47.883 -
ANNEXURE I

2
Settlement for Unit

Density, (gms/cm )
Corrected SPT, N''
3
Total settlement
Pressure, (mm)
Type of Layer
Void Raito, e
Layer No.
(kN/m )
(kN/m )
2
(mm)
(mm)
W'
1 SAND 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.79 Depth of Foundation
4.50
2 SAND 1.00 2.13 1.13 1.79 - - 60.00 27.43 116.19 0.028 1.000 - 5.620
ANNEXURE I

Depth of Open Foundation, m 1.00 Applied Pressure, kN/m2 209.76 Water Table depth for calculation, m 5.00
Settlement for Unit

Density, (gms/cm )
Corrected SPT, N''
3
Total settlement
Pressure, (mm)
Type of Layer
Void Raito, e
Layer No.
(kN/m )
(kN/m )
2
(mm)
(mm)
W'
1 SAND 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.79 Depth of Foundation
5.11
2 SAND 1.00 2.35 1.35 1.79 - - 60.00 29.40 119.86 0.030 1.000 - 6.392
ANNEXURE I
Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of 4 Lane with Paved Shoulders from Design Ch. 182.300 to Design Ch. 228.500 in Belgaum - Hungund - Raichur Section of NH748A (Ext. SH-20) in the State of Karnataka on
Name of Project :
Hybrid Annuity Mode (Package-5) SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.
Structure : VUP Chainage, kM 201+674 Reduced Level, m 541.031

Co-ordinates : 646021.000 E Bore Hole Depth , m 14.50 Ground Water Table, m Not-met
RESULT SHEET
1770559.000 N Borehole No. LBH-1
Dry Density / Dry Bulk Density,
Rock Quality Designation, %

Point Load strength Index, Mpa
SPT Value corrected due to

Uniaxial
Shear
SPT Value Recorded, N
Total Core Recovery, %

(as per IS: 1498- 1970)
Compression Index, CC
Sieve Analysis, (% Passing) Atterberg Limit Particle Size Analysis Compressive
Bulk Density, (gm/cm )
Moisture Content, (%)

3
Void Ratio RATIO, e0
Water Absorption, %
Parameter
Mean Diametre, dmm

Specific Gravity, Gm
Strength, kg/cm2
Depth of Sample
Type of Sample
Reduced Level
overburden, N'
Classification
dilatancy, N"
Type of Test
Water Table
Silt Factor, f
Penetration
Porosity, %
(gm/cm )
Plasticity Index, (%)
Cohesion (kg/cm )
Plastic Limit, (%)
Angle of Internal
Liquid Limit, (%)
Friction, (Ø°)
0.425, mm
0.075, mm
Unsoaked
Gravel, %
4.75, mm
2.00, mm
Sand %
Soaked
Clay %
Silt %
541.03 0.00 - 0.50 DS - - - SM 85 80 76 45 NON-PLASTIC - - - - - - - - - 15 40 43 2 0.890 1.660 - - - - - - -
1.00 - 1.45 DS - - - - SM 80 72 69 39 NON-PLASTIC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.45 - 1.90 SPT 30 56 80.23 80.23 SM 65 60 45 26 NON-PLASTIC 1.85 1.64 12.60 2.60 DST 0 30 0.585 - 35 39 24 2 1.429 2.104 - - - - - - -
538.03 2.50 - 3.00 NX - - - - MWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.45 - - 11.33 NILL
3.00 - 4.50 NX - - - - MWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.65 - - 36.60 NILL
4.50 - 6.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - 2.70 - 2.71 - - - - - - - - - 0.21 0.16 - 680.42 668.28 96.00 54.00
533.53 6.00 - 7.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 662.26 - 55.30 36.50
7.50 - 9.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 670.56 - 48.00 27.30
9.00 - 10.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 66.60 34.60
529.03 10.50 - 12.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.00 84.00
12.00 - 13.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.00 61.00
13.00 - 14.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 99.30 99.30

ANNEXURE I
Name of Project :

RESULT SHEET
1770563.000 N Borehole No. LBH-2


Uniaxial
Shear

(as per IS: 1498- 1970)

3
Water Absorption, %
Parameter
Mean Diametre, dmm

Strength, kg/cm2
Depth of Sample
Type of Sample
Reduced Level
overburden, N'
Classification
dilatancy, N"
Type of Test
Water Table
Silt Factor, f
Penetration
Porosity, %
(gm/cm )
Cohesion (kg/cm )
Plastic Limit, (%)
Angle of Internal
Liquid Limit, (%)
Friction, (Ø°)
0.425, mm
0.075, mm
Unsoaked
Gravel, %
4.75, mm
2.00, mm
Sand %
Soaked
Clay %
Silt %
541.55 0.00 - 0.50 DS - - - GM-GP 45 30 20 10 NON-PLASTIC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.00 - 1.45 DS - - - - GM-GP 50 46 29 8 NON-PLASTIC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.45 - 1.90 SPT - Ref - - GM-GP 48 35 18 8 NON-PLASTIC 1.81 1.65 9.60 2.60 DST 0 31 0.576 - 52 40 6 2 1.891 2.42 - - - - - - -
1.50 - 3.00 NX - - - MWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16.60 NILL
537.05 3.00 - 4.50 NX - - - MWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.92 - - 27.30 14.00
4.50 - 6.00 NX - - - MWR - - - - - - - - 2.69 - 2.70 - - - - - - - - - 0.21 0.17 - 648.45 632.73 48.60 34.00
6.00 - 7.50 NX - - - MWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 656.78 - 47.30 24.60
532.55 7.50 - 9.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 661.48 - 83.30 40.60
9.00 - 10.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 33.30 6.60
10.50 - 12.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 61.30 32.00
528.05 12.00 - 13.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 92.60 76.60

ANNEXURE I
Name of Project :

RESULT SHEET
1770541.000 N Borehole No. RBH-1


Uniaxial
Shear

(as per IS: 1498- 1970)

3
Water Absorption, %
Parameter
Mean Diametre, dmm

Strength, kg/cm2
Depth of Sample
Type of Sample
Reduced Level
overburden, N'
Classification
dilatancy, N"
Type of Test
Water Table
Silt Factor, f
Penetration
Porosity, %
(gm/cm )
Cohesion (kg/cm )
Plastic Limit, (%)
Angle of Internal
Liquid Limit, (%)
Friction, (Ø°)
0.425, mm
0.075, mm
Unsoaked
Gravel, %
4.75, mm
2.00, mm
Sand %
Soaked
Clay %
Silt %
540.77 0.00 - 0.50 DS - - - SM 85 80 76 45 NON-PLASTIC - - - - - - - - - 15 40 42 3 - - - - - - -
1.00 - 1.45 UD - - - - CI 95 92 90 88 45 23 22 1.93 1.65 17.20 2.66 UU 0.50 4 0.612 0.117 5 7 57 31 - 2.99 - - - - - - -
1.45 - 1.90 SPT 30 16 22.68 22.68 CI 91 85 81 80 39 22 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2.50 - 2.95 UD - - - CI 93 90 80 78 39 22 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
537.37 2.95 - 3.40 SPT 30 34 40.43 40.43 ML 80 65 60 55 NON-PLASTIC 1.83 1.60 14.10 2.58 DST 0.00 31 0.613 - 20 25 31 24 1.126 1.868 - - - - - - -
4.00 - 4.45 DS - - - ML 80 76 45 42 NON-PLASTIC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4.45 - 4.50 SPT 30 40 42.07 42.07 ML 81 72 38 35 NON-PLASTIC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
534.77 4.50 - 6.00 NX - - - MWR - - - - - - - - - - 2.69 - - - - - - - - - 0.26 0.18 - 610.26 592.65 68.00 30.00
6.00 - 7.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 593.48 - 36.00 28.66
7.50 - 9.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 52.66 18.66
530.27 9.00 - 10.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 602.46 - 66.66 46.66
10.50 - 12.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 88.66 88.00
12.00 - 13.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.00 100.00

ANNEXURE I
Name of Project :

RESULT SHEET
1770545.000 N Borehole No. RBH-2


Uniaxial
Shear

(as per IS: 1498- 1970)

3
Water Absorption, %
Parameter
Mean Diametre, dmm

Strength, kg/cm2
Depth of Sample
Type of Sample
Reduced Level
overburden, N'
Classification
dilatancy, N"
Type of Test
Water Table
Silt Factor, f
Penetration
Porosity, %
(gm/cm )
Cohesion (kg/cm )
Plastic Limit, (%)
Angle of Internal
Liquid Limit, (%)
Friction, (Ø°)
0.425, mm
0.075, mm
Unsoaked
Gravel, %
4.75, mm
2.00, mm
Sand %
Soaked
Clay %
Silt %
541.57 0.00 - 0.50 DS - - - SM 95 90 80 40 NON-PLASTIC - - - - - - - - - 5 55 37 3 0.277 0.926 - - - - - - -
1.00 - 1.45 DS - - - - SM 75 60 30 26 NON-PLASTIC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.45 - 1.90 SPT 30 56 80.55 80.55 SM 65 58 30 23 NON-PLASTIC 1.82 1.65 10.00 2.60 DST 0 31 0.576 - 35 42 22 1 1.563 2.200 - - - - - - -
2.50 - 2.95 DS - - - - SM 80 71 58 25 NON-PLASTIC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
538.17 2.95 - 3.40 SPT 30 57 68.4 68.4 SM 72 68 45 26 NON-PLASTIC 1.82 1.66 9.90 2.60 DST 0 31 0.566 - 28 46 26 0 1.273 1.986 - - - - - - -
3.00 - 4.50 NX - - - MWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26.66 NILL
4.50 - 6.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - 2.70 - 2.71 - - - - - - - - - 0.25 0.19 - 626.28 605.27 70.66 42.00
534.07 6.00 - 7.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 62.66 36.00
7.50 - 9.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 636.47 - 76.66 65.33
9.00 - 10.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 67.33 42.66
529.57 10.50 - 12.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 653.49 - 79.33 65.33
12.00 - 13.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 76.66 76.66
13.50 - 15.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 98.66 82.00

ANNEXURE I
Name of Project :

RESULT SHEET
1770557.000 N Borehole No. BHRE-01


Uniaxial
Shear

(as per IS: 1498- 1970)

3
Water Absorption, %
Parameter
Mean Diametre, dmm

Strength, kg/cm2
Depth of Sample
Type of Sample
Reduced Level
overburden, N'
Classification
dilatancy, N"
Type of Test
Water Table
Silt Factor, f
Penetration
Porosity, %
(gm/cm )
Cohesion (kg/cm )
Plastic Limit, (%)
Angle of Internal
Liquid Limit, (%)
Friction, (Ø°)
0.425, mm
0.075, mm
Unsoaked
Gravel, %
4.75, mm
2.00, mm
Sand %
Soaked
Clay %
Silt %
540.89 0.00 - 0.50 DS - - - CI 95 93 92 90 48 24 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.00 - 1.45 UDS - - - - CI 92 90 88 85 48 24 24 1.96 1.65 18.60 2.66 UU 0.5 5 0.612 0.119 8 7 53 32 - 2.99 - - - - - - -
1.45 - 1.90 SPT 30 14 19.79 19.79 CI 96 93 91 89 45 22 23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2.50 - 2.95 UDS - - - - CI 95 94 92 78 38 20 18 1.94 1.67 16.20 2.66 UU 0.45 7 0.593 0.117 5 17 52 26 - 2.92 - - - - - - -
537.49 2.95 - 3.40 SPT 30 17 20.01 20.01 CI 89 78 75 72 38 20 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4.00 - 4.45 DS - - - - SM 85 76 72 42 NON-PLASTIC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4.45 - 4.95 SPT 30 21 22.01 22.01 SM 90 80 68 36 NON-PLASTIC 1.81 1.59 13.60 2.59 DST 0 31 - - 10 54 34 2 0.692 1.464 - - - - -
534.89 4.50 - 6.00 NX - MWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.65 - - 30.00 8.00
6.00 - 7.50 NX MWR - - - - - - - - - 2.68 2.69 - - - - - - - - - 0.27 0.22 - 561.24 545.23 56.00 35.30
7.50 - 9.00 NX MWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 46.60 20.60
530.39 9.00 - 10.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 549.11 - 43.30 34.00
10.50 - 12.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 81.30 73.30
12.00 - 13.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 78.60 78.60
13.50 - 15.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 52.00 40.60

ANNEXURE I
Name of Project :

RESULT SHEET


Uniaxial
Shear

(as per IS: 1498- 1970)

3
Water Absorption, %
Parameter
Mean Diametre, dmm

Strength, kg/cm2
Depth of Sample
Type of Sample
Reduced Level
overburden, N'
Classification
dilatancy, N"
Type of Test
Water Table
Silt Factor, f
Penetration
Porosity, %
(gm/cm )
Cohesion (kg/cm )
Plastic Limit, (%)
Angle of Internal
Liquid Limit, (%)
Friction, (Ø°)
0.425, mm
0.075, mm
Unsoaked
Gravel, %
4.75, mm
2.00, mm
Sand %
Soaked
Clay %
Silt %
540.83 0.00 - 0.50 DS - - - CH 95 94 92 90 51 24 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.00 - 1.45 UD - - - CH 92 91 90 88 51 24 24 1.96 1.58 24.20 2.66 UU 0.50 2 0.684 0.130 8 4 51 37 - 2.99 - - - - - - -
1.45 - 1.90 SPT - - - CI 96 94 93 90 48 23 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2.50 - 2.95 UD - - - CI 95 92 90 88 48 23 24 1.94 1.65 17.60 2.65 UU 0.50 6 0.606 0.117 5 7 53 35 - 2.99 - - - - - - -
537.43 2.95 - 3.40 SPT 30 23 27.06 27.06 CI 90 88 85 81 48 23 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3.00 - 4.50 NX - - - HWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6.66 NILL
4.50 - 6.00 NX - - - HWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6.00 NILL
533.33 6.00 - 7.50 NX - - - HWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.85 - - 26.00 NILL
7.50 - 9.00 NX - - - MWR - - - - - - - 2.71 - 2.72 - - - - - - - - - - 0.34 0.26 - 563.33 547.88 34.00 24.66
9.00 - 10.50 NX - - - MWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14.66 8.00
528.83 10.50 - 12.00 NX - - - MWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12.66 7.33
12.00 - 13.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 571.56 - 24.66 20.00
13.50 - 15.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 38.66 38.66

ANNEXURE I
Name of Project :

RESULT SHEET


Uniaxial
Shear

(as per IS: 1498- 1970)

3
Water Absorption, %
Parameter
Mean Diametre, dmm

Strength, kg/cm2
Depth of Sample
Type of Sample
Reduced Level
overburden, N'
Classification
dilatancy, N"
Type of Test
Water Table
Silt Factor, f
Penetration
Porosity, %
(gm/cm )
Cohesion (kg/cm )
Plastic Limit, (%)
Angle of Internal
Liquid Limit, (%)
Friction, (Ø°)
0.425, mm
0.075, mm
Unsoaked
Gravel, %
4.75, mm
2.00, mm
Sand %
Soaked
Clay %
Silt %
542.30 0.00 - 0.50 DS - - - SM 90 76 60 38 NON-PLASTIC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.00 - 1.45 UD - - - SM-SP 85 70 58 10 NON-PLASTIC 1.79 1.65 8.60 2.60 DST 0 30 0.576 - 15 75 10 0 0.713 1.486 - - - - - - -
1.45 - 1.90 SPT 30 50 72.14 72.14 SM-SP 89 67 56 8 NON-PLASTIC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.50 - 3.00 NX - - - HWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.87 - - 20.00 20.00
537.80 3.00 - 4.50 NX - - - HWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10.00 7.33
4.50 - 6.00 NX - - - MWR - - - - - - - - 2.69 - 2.70 - - - - - - - - - 0.36 0.27 - 542.48 520.11 54.66 20.66
6.00 - 7.50 NX - - - MWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 511.61 - 46.66 16.66
533.30 7.50 - 9.00 NX - - - HWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24.66 NILL
9.00 - 10.50 NX - - - HWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 34.66 NILL
10.50 - 12.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 561.28 - 48.00 26.66
528.80 12.00 - 13.50 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44.00 38.00
13.50 - 15.00 NX - - - SWR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 52.00 46.00

ANNEXURE III
GEOLOGICAL LOG OF DRILL HOLE SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.
Name of Project: Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of 4 Lane with Paved Shoulders from Design Ch. 182.300 to Design Ch. 228.500 in Belgaum - Hungund - Raichur Section of NH748A (Ext. SH-20) in the State of Karnataka on Hybrid Annuity Mode (Package-5)
Bore Hole No. LBH-1 Easting, m 646021.00 Depth of Water Level (m) Not-met
Depth of Bore Hole 14.50 Northing, m 1770559.00
Chainage, Km 201+674 Elevation 541.031
Depth of Thickness of Representation of Description of Soil/Rock Rock Quality

Reduced Level Drill Core Length Core Recovery Size of hole Length of Casing Water Colour Water Loss Penetration Rate
Bore Hole, m strata Soil/Rock symbolic (Lithology) Designation
metre metre metre metre (%) (%) metre (mm/min)
0.00 541.031 __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
Silty Sand
2.50 538.531 2.50 __ 2.50 __ __ __ __ __ __ __
3.00 538.031 0.50 0.50 11.33 NILL NX __ __ __ __

Grey ,Medium to Coarse grain ,Highly
Weathered Rock.Rich quartz and
feldspar, Granite Rock
4.50 536.531 1.50 1.50 36.6 NILL NX __ __ __ __
6.00 535.031 1.50 1.50 96 54 NX __ __ __ __
Grey ,Medium to Coarse grain ,Moderately

7.50 533.531 1.50 to Slightly Weathered Rock.Rich quartz 1.50 55.3 36.5 NX __ __ __ __
and feldspar, Granite Rock
9.00 532.031 1.50 1.50 48 27.3 NX __ __ __ __
10.50 530.531 1.50 1.50 66.6 34.6 NX __ __ __ __
12.00 529.031 1.50 1.50 100 84 NX __ __ __ __

Grey ,Medium to Coarse grain , Slightly
13.00 528.031 1.00 1.00 100 61 NX __ __ __ __
14.50 526.531 1.50 1.50 99.3 99.3 NX __ __ __ __

ANNEXURE III
Bore Hole No. LBH-2 Easting, m 646039.00 Depth of Water Level (m) Not-met

0.00 541.550 __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
Silty Gravels
1.50 540.050 1.50 __ 1.50 __ __ __ __ __ __ __
3.00 538.550 1.50 1.50 16.6 NILL NX __ __ __ __
4.50 537.050 1.50 1.50 27.3 14 NX __ __ __ __

to Slightly Weathered Rock.Rich quartz
6.00 535.550 1.50 1.50 48.6 34 NX __ __ __ __
7.50 534.050 1.50 1.50 47.3 24.6 NX __ __ __ __
9.00 532.550 1.50 1.50 83.3 40.6 NX __ __ __ __
10.50 531.050 1.50 1.50 33.3 6.6 NX __ __ __ __

_Grey ,Medium to Coarse grain , Slightly
12.00 529.550 1.50 1.50 61.3 32 NX __ __ __ __
13.50 528.050 1.50 1.50 92.6 76.6 NX __ __ __ __

ANNEXURE III
Bore Hole No. RBH-1 Easting, m 646028.00 Depth of Water Level (m) Not-met

0.00 540.768 __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
Silty Sand
0.50 540.268 0.50 __ 0.50 __ __ __ __ __ __ __
3.00 537.768 2.50 Silty Clay Medium Compressibility 2.50 __ __ __ __ __ __
4.50 536.268 1.50 Clayey Silty with none to Low Plasticity. 1.50 __ __ __ __ __ __
6.00 534.768 1.50 1.50 68 30 NX __ __ __ __

7.50 533.268 1.50 to Slightly Weathered Rock.Rich quartz 1.50 36 28.66 NX __ __ __ __
9.00 531.768 1.50 1.50 52.66 18.66 NX __ __ __ __
10.50 530.268 1.50 1.50 66.66 46.66 NX __ __ __ __
12.00 528.768 1.50 1.50 88.66 88.66 NX __ __ __ __

_Grey ,Medium to Coarse grain , Slightly
13.50 527.268 1.50 1.50 100 100 NX __ __ __ __
15.00 525.768 1.50 1.50 90.66 82.66 NX __ __ __ __

ANNEXURE III
Bore Hole No. RBH-2 Easting, m 646050.00 Depth of Water Level (m) Not-met

0.00 541.572 __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
Silty Sand
3.00 538.572 3.00 __ 3.00 __ __ __ __ __ __ __
4.50 537.072 1.50 1.50 26.66 NILL NX __ __ __ __

6.00 535.572 1.50 to Slightly Weathered Rock.Rich quartz 1.50 70.66 42 NX __ __ __ __
7.50 534.072 1.50 1.50 62.66 36 NX __ __ __ __
9.00 532.572 1.50 1.50 76.66 65.33 NX __ __ __ __
10.50 531.072 1.50 1.50 67.33 42.66 NX __ __ __ __

12.00 529.572 1.50 Weathered Rock.Rich quartz and 1.50 79.33 65.33 NX __ __ __ __
13.50 528.072 1.50 1.50 76.66 76.66 NX __ __ __ __
15.00 526.572 1.50 1.50 98.66 82 NX __ __ __ __

ANNEXURE III
Bore Hole No. BHRE-1 Easting, m 645905.00 Depth of Water Level (m) Not-met
Chainage, Km Elevation 540.885

0.00 540.885 __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
_Silty Clay Medium Compressibility
3.50 537.385 3.50 __ 3.50 __ __ __ __ __ __ __
4.50 536.385 1.00 __ Silty Sand 1.00 __ __ __ __ __ __ __
6.00 534.885 1.50 1.50 30 8 NX __ __ __ __
Grey ,Medium to Coarse grain ,Highly to

7.50 533.385 1.50 Moderately Weathered Rock.Rich quartz 1.50 56 35.3 NX __ __ __ __
9.00 531.885 1.50 1.50 46.6 20.6 NX __ __ __ __
10.50 530.385 1.50 1.50 43.3 34 NX __ __ __ __
12.00 528.885 1.50 1.50 81.3 73.3 NX __ __ __ __

to Slightly Weathered Rock.Rich quartz
13.50 527.385 1.50 1.50 78.6 78.6 NX __ __ __ __
15.00 525.885 1.50 1.50 52 40.6 NX __ __ __ __

ANNEXURE III

0.00 540.827 __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
Clay with High Compressibility
1.50 539.327 1.50 __ 1.50 __ __ __ __ __ __ __
3.00 537.827 1.50 Silty Clay with Medium Compressibility 1.50 __ __ NX __ __ __ __
4.50 536.327 1.50 1.50 6.66 NILL NX __ __ __ __
Grey ,Medium to Coarse grain ,

Completely to Highly Weathered
6.00 534.827 1.50 1.50 6 NILL NX __ __ __ __
Rock.Rich quartz and feldspar, Granite
Rock
7.50 533.327 1.50 1.50 26 NILL NX __ __ __ __
9.00 531.827 1.50 1.50 34 24.66 NX __ __ __ __
10.50 530.327 1.50 1.50 14.66 8.00 NX __ __ __ __

12.00 528.827 1.50 to Slightly Weathered Rock.Rich quartz 1.50 12.66 7.33 NX __ __ __ __
13.50 527.327 1.50 1.50 24.66 20 NX __ __ __ __
15.00 525.827 1.50 1.50 38.66 38.66 NX __ __ __ __

ANNEXURE III

0.00 542.301 __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
Silty Sand
0.50 541.801 0.50 __ 0.50 __ __ __ __ __ __ __
1.50 540.801 1.00 Poorly Graded Sand 1.00 __ __ __ __ __ __ __
3.00 539.301 1.50 1.50 20 20 NX __ __ __ __
4.50 537.801 1.50 1.50 10 7.33 NX __ __ __ __

Grey ,Medium to Coarse grain , Highly to
Moderately Weathered Rock.Rich quartz
6.00 536.301 1.50 1.50 54.66 20.66 NX __ __ __ __
7.50 534.801 1.50 1.50 46.66 16.66 NX __ __ __ __
9.00 533.301 1.50 1.50 24.66 Nill NX __ __ __ __

Grey ,Medium to Coarse grain , Highly
10.50 531.801 1.50 1.50 34.66 Nill NX __ __ __ __
12.00 530.301 1.50 1.50 48 26.66 NX __ __ __ __

13.50 528.801 1.50 Weathered Rock.Rich quartz and 1.50 44 38 NX __ __ __ __
15.00 527.301 1.50 1.50 52 46 NX __ __ __ __

ANNEXURE IV
SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD. ROCK MASS RATING (RMR) CALCULATION

Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of 4 Lane with Paved Shoulders from Design Ch. 182.300 to Design Ch. 228.500 in Belgaum -
Name of Project:
Hungund - Raichur Section of NH748A (Ext. SH-20) in the State of Karnataka on Hybrid Annuity Mode (Package-5)
Bore Hole No. LBH-1 Chainage, Km 201+674
Depth of Bore Hole 14.50 Depth of Water Level (m) Not-Met
UCS
RQD Spacing of Condition of Joint Ground Water Strike & Dip Orientation
Depth of Bore Hole, m Rating\Point RMR Class No. Description of Rock
Rating Discontinuities Rating Rating Rating of Joints
Load
0.00 - 2.50 SOIL
2.50 - 3.00 4 3 5 20 7 -7 32 IV Poor Rock
3.00 - 4.50 4 3 5 20 7 -7 32 IV Poor Rock
4.50 - 6.00 7 13 8 25 7 -7 53 III Fair Rock
6.00 - 7.50 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
7.50 - 9.00 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
9.00 - 10.50 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
10.50 - 12.00 7 17 10 25 7 -7 59 III Fair Rock
12.00 - 13.00 7 13 10 25 7 -7 55 III Fair Rock
13.00 - 14.50 7 20 10 25 7 -7 62 II Good Rock

ANNEXURE IV

Name of Project:
Bore Hole No. LBH-2 Chainage, Km 201+674
Depth of Bore Hole 13.5 Depth of Water Level (m) Not-Met
UCS
Load
0.00 - 1.50 SOIL
1.50 - 3.00 4 3 5 20 7 -7 32 IV Poor Rock
3.00 - 4.50 4 3 5 25 7 -7 37 IV Poor Rock
4.50 - 6.00 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
6.00 - 7.50 7 3 8 25 7 -7 43 III Fair Rock
7.50 - 9.00 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
9.00 - 10.50 7 3 8 25 7 -7 43 III Fair Rock
10.50 - 12.00 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
12.00 - 13.50 7 17 10 25 7 -7 59 III Fair Rock

ANNEXURE IV

Name of Project:
Bore Hole No. RBH-1 Chainage, Km 201+674
Depth of Bore Hole 15 Depth of Water Level (m) Not-Met
UCS
Load
0.00 - 4.50 SOIL
4.50 - 6.00 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
6.00 - 7.50 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
7.50 - 9.00 7 3 8 25 7 -7 43 III Fair Rock
9.00 - 10.50 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
10.50 - 12.00 12 17 10 25 7 -7 64 II Good Rock
12.00 - 13.50 12 20 10 25 7 -7 67 II Good Rock
13.50 - 15.00 12 17 10 25 7 -7 64 II Good Rock

ANNEXURE IV

Name of Project:
Bore Hole No. RBH-2 Chainage, Km 201+674
UCS
Load
0.00 - 3.00 SOIL
3.00 - 4.50 4 3 5 20 7 -7 32 IV Poor Rock
4.50 - 6.00 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
6.00 - 7.50 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
7.50 - 9.00 7 13 8 25 7 -7 53 III Fair Rock
9.00 - 10.50 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
10.50 - 12.00 7 13 8 25 7 -7 53 III Fair Rock
12.00 - 13.50 7 17 10 25 7 -7 59 III Fair Rock
13.50 - 15.00 12 17 10 25 7 -7 64 II Good Rock

ANNEXURE IV

Name of Project:
Bore Hole No. BHRE-1 Chainage, Km 201+674
UCS
Load
0.00 - 4.00 SOIL
4.50 - 6.00 4 3 5 20 7 -7 32 IV Poor Rock
6.00 - 7.50 4 8 5 20 7 -7 37 IV Poor Rock
7.50 - 9.00 4 3 5 20 7 -7 32 IV Poor Rock
9.00 - 10.50 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
10.50 - 12.00 7 17 8 25 7 -7 57 III Fair Rock
12.00 - 13.50 7 17 8 25 7 -7 57 III Fair Rock
13.50 - 15.00 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock

ANNEXURE IV

Name of Project:
UCS
Load
0.00 - 3.00 SOIL
3.00 - 4.50 4 3 5 20 7 -7 32 IV Poor Rock
4.50 - 6.00 4 3 5 20 7 -7 32 IV Poor Rock
6.00 - 7.50 4 3 5 20 7 -7 32 IV Poor Rock
7.50 - 9.00 4 3 8 25 7 -7 40 IV Poor Rock
9.00 - 10.50 7 3 8 25 7 -7 43 III Fair Rock
10.50 - 12.00 7 3 8 25 7 -7 43 III Fair Rock
12.00 - 13.50 7 3 8 25 7 -7 43 III Fair Rock
13.50 - 15.00 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock

ANNEXURE IV

Name of Project:
UCS
Load
0.00 - 1.50 SOIL
1.50 - 3.00 4 3 5 20 7 -7 32 IV Poor Rock
3.00 - 4.50 4 3 5 20 7 -7 32 IV Poor Rock
4.50 - 6.00 7 3 5 25 7 -7 40 IV Poor Rock
6.00 - 7.50 7 3 5 25 7 -7 40 IV Poor Rock
7.50 - 9.00 7 3 5 25 7 -7 40 IV Poor Rock
9.00 - 10.50 7 3 5 25 7 -7 40 IV Poor Rock
10.50 - 12.00 7 3 8 25 7 -7 43 III Fair Rock
12.00 - 13.50 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock
13.50 - 15.00 7 8 8 25 7 -7 48 III Fair Rock

SGPL - Gril - Behu 5 - 201+674 - Vup - 28.08.2023 - R0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

SGPL - Gril - Behu 5 - 201+674 - Vup - 28.08.2023 - R0

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SGPL - Gril - Behu 5 - 201+674 - Vup - 28.08.2023 - R0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PROJECT:

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

Project No.: SGPL/GRIL/BEHU-5_201+674_VUP_28-08-2023_R0

SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.

1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 2

2.0 GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION OF THE REGION ........................................................................................... 4

GENERAL GEOLOGY OF THE AREA........................................................................................................................ 4

3.0 METHODOLOGY OF FIELD INVESTIGATION ............................................................................................... 5

4.0 LABORATORY TESTING ................................................................................................................................ 10

5.0 REFERENCE CODES ...................................................................................................................................... 11

6.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITION .......................................................................................................................... 12

VARIABILTY IN SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS....................................................................................................... 12

7.0 FOUNDATION SUPPORT................................................................................................................................ 13

ASSESSMENT OF LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL OF THE SITE......................................................................... 13

8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS: ................................................................................................................................... 23

SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.

SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.

Borehole Span Co-ordinates Reduced Depth in Depth in Bore hole

LBH-1 646021 1770559 541.031 2.50 12.00 14.50

LBH-2 646039 1770563 541.550 1.50 12.00 13.50

Reference Codes (Field Investigation)

SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.

2.0 GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION OF THE REGION

GENERAL GEOLOGY OF THE AREA

The project site is located in Raichur District in the State of Karnataka.

CLIMATE AND RAINFALL

SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.

3.0 METHODOLOGY OF FIELD INVESTIGATION

Sl. No. Particulars of Properties Ref: IS Code

1. Sub-Surface Investigations for Foundations IS: 1892-1979

Bore-hole was selected by Engineer in charge in order to obtain comprehensive sub-soil

STANDARD PENETRATION TESTS

SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.

Fig.-1 of IS- 2131-1981

for values of N’ greater than 15,

SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.

CONSISTENCY / RELATIVE DENSITY OF SOIL WITH SPT VALUES:

Consistency of Cohesive Soils Density Condition of Granular Soils

SPT Value Consistency SPT Value Density Descriptor

0-2 Very Soft 0-4 Very Loose

2-4 Soft 4-10 Loose

4-8 Medium 10-30 Medium Dense

8-15 Stiff 30-50 Dense

15-30 Very Stiff >50 Very Dense

Plasticity Liquid Limit

Low Plastic <35

High Plastic >50

SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.

UNDISTURBED SOIL SAMPLES (UDS)

ROCK CORE SAMPLES

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RQD AND IN-SITU ROCK QUALITY

RQD CLASSIFICATION RQD (%)

Very Poor 00 to <25

SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.

SCALE OF WEATHERING GRADES OF ROCK MASS

CLASSIFICATION OF ROCK WITH RESPECT TO COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH

SPYROTECH GEOCON PVT. LTD.

GROUND WATER TABLE